Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:40:42.491Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - The role of group size in predator sensitive foraging decisions for wedge-capped capuchin monkeys (Cebus olivaceus)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2009

Lynne E. Miller
Affiliation:
MiraCosta College, Oceanside, California
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Primatologists have only recently begun to investigate the impact of predation on foraging strategies, and the many variables that might mediate this relationship. Traditionally, success in foraging and success in avoiding predators were treated as two independent phenomena. Both might depend upon group size, but the interaction was rarely considered (e.g., for capuchins, Miller 1992, de Ruiter 1986, Srikosamatara 1987). This study explores the extent to which group size influences perceived risk of predation and how this, in turn, affects food intake. Data come from an ongoing study of one population of wedge-capped capuchins (Cebus olivaceus), living at the Hato Piñero Biological Reserve in central Venezuela.

Previous studies with this population of capuchins revealed a strong link between group size and seasonality in food intake. Adult females living in larger groups maintain an essentially constant level of food intake throughout the year (approximately 1800 cm3 of food per female per day, on average). In contrast, those in smaller groups experience dramatic annual variation, consuming very little during the dry season (approx. 1100 cm3) but much more in the wet season (approx. 2900 cm3) (Miller 1996). This pattern is only partly the result of differences in foraging effort. During the wet season, small-group females devote significantly more time to feeding and foraging than do large-group females (68% and 55%, respectively, of their daily activity budgets) and so the disparity in food intake is predictable. However, during the dry season, foraging time is not significantly different (58% in larger groups and 54% in smaller groups) (Miller 1996).

Type
Chapter
Information
Eat or be Eaten
Predator Sensitive Foraging Among Primates
, pp. 95 - 106
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×