Agricola, Johann and Friedrich, Johann. Drey hundert gemeyner Sprichwörtter: der wir Deutschen uns gebrauchen, und doch nicht wyssen wo her sie kommen. Nuremberg: F. Peypůs, 1529.Google Scholar

Anglicus, Bartholomaeus. Van den Proprieteyten der Dinghen. Haarlem: Jacobus Bellaert, 1485.Google Scholar

Apian, Peter. Cosmographia, Additis de Eadem Re Libelllis, ut Sequens Pagina Docet. Ed. Frisius, Rainer Gemma. Antwerp: Birckman, 1539.Google Scholar

Apian, Peter. Cosmographiae Introductio: Cum Quibusdam Geo-Metriae ac Astronomiae Prin=‖cipijs ad eam Rem Necessarijs.‖. Ingolstadt: Peter and Georg Apian, 1529.Google Scholar

Apian, Peter. Cosmographie, Oft Beschrijvinghe der Geheelder Werelt van Petrus Apianus. 3. Werk, Nu Ghecorrigeert van Gemma Frisio. Metten Zeecompasse Ende Anderen Boecxkens Byden Selven Gemma Daer Toegedaen. Ed. Frisius, Rainer Gemma. Antwerp: de Bonte, 1553.Google Scholar

Apian, Peter. Instrument-Buch Durch Petrum Apianum erst von new beschriben. Zum Ersten ist darinne begriffen ein newer Quadrant, dardurch Tag vnd Nacht, bey der Sonnen, Mon vnnd andern Planeten, auch durch ettliche Gestirn die Stunden vnd ander nutzung Gefunden werden. Zum Andern, wie man die höch der Thuern vnd anderer gebew … messen soll. Zum Dritten wie man das wasser absehen oder abwegen soll … vnd wie man die Bruenne suchen soll. … Ingolstadt: Apian, 1533.Google Scholar

Apian, Peter. Practica Auff Das 1532 Jar Zu Eeren den Durchleutchtigen Hochgebornen Fürsten und HH Hern Wilhelmen und Hernn Ludwigen Pfalz Bei Rehyn Herzogen in Obern und Nider Bayern … Durch Petrum Apianum der Loblichen Hohennschul zu Ingelstat Mathematicum nach Rechter Kunst und Art der Astronomei Practiciert. Auch Wird Nachvolgenden von dem naeschst Erschinen Cometen/ Wie unnd in was Gestalt in Gemelter Apianus Observiert hat und Welhe Biß Her Dero Vil Sindt in Irem Schreiben Irrig Gefunden Bewerlich Angezaygt. Landshut: Georg Apian, 1532.Google Scholar

Aristotle, and Scotus, Michael, eds. In disem Biechlin wirt erfunden von Complexion der Menschen: zuerlernen leibliche unnd menschliche Natur ir Siten, Geberden und Nayglichayt zuerkennen und urtaylen. Strasbourg: Mathis Hüpfuff, 1511.Google Scholar

Brabant. Van Brabant die excellente Cronike … totten iare M. CCCCC. ende XXX in Junio. Antwerp: J. van Doesborch, 1530.Google Scholar

Brolesse, Hans. Hierin Begriffne Pis/ Zaygen Klaær=‖lich an/ Wie Ain Yedes Roß/ Jung vñ Alt Sol Gezämbt/‖ Dadurch Jme/ Angenomene Pœse Gewonheit/ Vbelstandt/ Vnd Vntugent/‖ Benomen/ Vnd Abgewent Werden Mag‖. Regensburg: Hans Kohl, 1539.Google Scholar

Cocles [Bartolommeo della Rocca], . Barptolomaei Coclitis Bononiensis, Naturalis Philosophiæ ac Medicinæ Doctoris, Physiognomiæ et Chiromantiæ Compendium. Argentorati: Albertus, 1536.Google Scholar

Cocles [Bartolommeo della Rocca], . Complexion/ Natur ‖ vnd eigenschafft eines yeden menschen ‖ zu erfaren/ auch seiner geburt stund vnnd zeychen/‖ dardurch jm all sein glück vnnd vnfal/ so jm in ‖ der zeyt seyns lebens begegnen wirt/ er-‖öffnet mag werden/ … ‖ Der sieben Planeten sampt den zwölff heimli=‖schen zeichen wirckung in des menschen geburt/‖ clerlich beschrieben.‖. Mainz: Peter Jordan, 1534.Google Scholar

Cocles [Bartolommeo della Rocca], . Der schapherders ‖ Kalender. Eyn sere schone vnde nutthe ‖ boek/ myt velen fruchtbaren mate=‖rien … ‖ Jtem tho ende dusses bokes vyndeth ‖ men de Kleyne Physonomye/ vth welkere/‖ des mynschen Complexie vnde tone=‖gynghe der natuer klärlyck to ‖ erkennen werth. Rostock: Ludwig Dietz, 1523.Google Scholar

Cocles [Bartolommeo della Rocca], . In Disem Büechlin Wirt Erfunden von Complexion der Menschen. Augsburg: Hans Schönsperger, 1515.Google Scholar

Cocles [Bartolommeo della Rocca], . Phisonomei: Complexio und Art eins ieden Menschen, ausz Gestalt und Form des Angesichts, Glider unnd allen geberden zu erlernen. Strasbourg: Egenolff, 1529.Google Scholar

Cocles [Bartolommeo della Rocca], . Phisonomei: Eins jeden menschen Art, Natur und Complexion. Strasbourg: Egenolff, 1530.Google Scholar

Cocles [Bartolommeo della Rocca], . Phisionomi vnd ‖ Chiromanci.‖ Eyn newß Complexion Büch=‖lein/ Der Menschen Geburt/ Sitten/ Geberden vnd Neyg=‖ligkeyten/ Auß der Phisionomi/ Chiromanci/ Den Siben ‖ Planeten/ Zwölff Zeichen/ Vnnd den XXXvj. Bildern ‖ Deß Himels/ … Quarto. Strasbourg: Jakob Cammerlander, 1540.Google Scholar

Copp, Johann. Erklärung unnd grüntliche Underweysung, alles nutzes, so in dem edlen Instrument, Astrolabium genannt, begriffen, und erfunden würt/ denen so der lateinischen Sprach unverstendig/ doch liebhaber der Kunst/ erkannt trewlich verteütscht/ unnd durch den Truck außgegangen. Augsburg: Otmar, 1525.Google Scholar

Dryander, Johann. SPHERAE MATERIALIS.‖ Siue globi coelestis. <Das ist>‖ Des Hymels lauff gründtliche außle=‖gung/ so vil zur anleytung der Astro‖nomie dienet/ mit vilen nützlichen regeln verfast/‖ durch IOHAN DRYANDERN/ genent ‖ Eychman/ ordinarien Medicum, der löblichen Vni=‖uersiteten Marpurg/ von newem ver=‖deütscht vnnd ann tag bracht.‖. Marburg: Johannis Dryander and Christian Egenolff d.Ä., 1539.Google Scholar

Fabri, Johannes and Fabri, Wenceslaus. Opus sphericum Johannis de sacro busto: figuris et p[er]utili co[m]mento illustratu[m]. Agrippine: Per Henricum Quentell, 1501.Google Scholar

Gersdorff, Hans von. Stat vnd Feldtbůch ‖ Bewerter Wundtartznei. New ‖ Widerumb Ersehen. Zusampt dem Antidotari/‖ Fürsorg vnd Vorrath der Chirurgei. Beschriben ‖ von Herrn Vualthero Riuio, Medico.‖. Zů Franckenfurt. Bei Christian Egenolff.‖(M.D.LI.‖). Frankfurt: Christian Egenolff d.Ä., 1551.Google Scholar

Gersdorff, Hans von and Indagine, Johannes. Feldtbůch der Wund-Artzney: sampt vilen Instrumenten der Chirurgey; vß dem Albucasi contrafayt. Chiromantia Jo. Jndagine. das Ist, die Kunst der Handtbesehung. Natürliche Astrologey, … Physiognomey, … Complexion Buch. … Canones, oder Regelen eins Yeden Kranckheyt Warlich zu Erkündigen … Strasbourg: Schott, 1540.Google Scholar

Gratarolo, Pomponio and Gratarolo, Guglielmo. Introductiones apotelesmaticae in physiognomiam, astrologiam naturalem, complexiones hominum, naturas planetarum. Cum periaxiomatibus de faciebus signorum … Quibus … accessit Gulielmi Grataroli … opuscula De memoria reparanda, augenda, conservanda; De praedictione morum naturarumque hominum; De mutatione temporum … et Pomponii Gaurici … tractatus De symmetriis, lineamentis & physiognomia, ejusque speciebus, etc. Ursellis: Apud Cornelium Sutorium, impensis Lazari Zetzneri, 1603.Google Scholar

Gratarolo, Pomponio and Gratarolo, Guglielmo. Hier Inn Begriffne Pis, Zaigen Clärlich an, Wie Ain Yedess Roß, Iüng und Alt Soll Gezämbt, Dadurch Ime, Angenomene Pöse Gewonhait Ubelstandt, … Benomen … Werden Mag. VD 16 G 592. Augsburg[?], 1530.Google Scholar

Indagine, Joannes ab and Berntsz, Jan. Chyromantia … Enn Dit Boec Leert van Drie Naturlike Consten Als Phisiognomia, Astrologia Naturalis, Chiromantia. Utrecht: Jan Berntsz, 1536.Google Scholar

Indagine, Ioannes ab and Schott, Johannes. Introdvctiones Apoteles‖maticæ elegantes, in Chyromantiam, Physiognomiam, ‖ Astrologiam naturalem, Complexiones hominum, ‖ Naturas planetarum. Cum periaxiomatibus de‖ faciebus Signorum, & canonib. de ægritu-‖dinibus, nusqua[m] fere simili tractata‖ compendio. Strasbourg: Schott, 1522.Google Scholar

Indagine, Johannes ab et al. Die Kunst der Chiromantzey: vsz Besehung der Hend. Physiognomey / vsz Anblick des Menschens. Natürlichen Astrologey noch dem Lauff der Soñen. Complexion eins yegklichen Menschens. Natürlichen Ynflüssz der Planeten. der zwolff Zeichen Angesychten. Ettliche Canones / zu Erkantnüsz der Menschen Kranckheiten / solicher weisz vormals nye beschriben oder gedruckt. Zusamen verordnet / vnd verteütscht durch … Strasbourg: Schott, 1523.Google Scholar

Jordan, Peter. Geomantia.‖ Kuenstlicher vnd rechtschaffner gebrauch ‖ der alten kleynen Geomancey/ mit welcher durch hilff der ‖ Rechnung vnd des menschen Tauffnamens/ sampt der ‖ Planeten wirckung/ in jren stunden/ allen Adams ‖ Kindern/ künfftiger zůfall des gůtten vnd ‖ bœsen glücks erœffnet wirt.‖ Zů sampt andern fünff … ‖ Tafeln … ‖ Mit beygesetztem kuenstlichen Jnstrument vñ regeln/‖ … ‖. Mainz: Peter Jordan, 1534.Google Scholar

Megenberg, Conradus. Hye Nach Volget das Puch der Natur das Innhaltet zu dem Ersten von Eygenschafft und Natur des Menschen, Darnach von der Natur und Eygenschafft des Himels, der Tier des Gefügels[!], der Kreuter, der Steyn und von Vil Ander Natürlichen Dingen. Augsburg: Baemler, 1475.Google Scholar

More, Thomas. Libellus vere aureus nec Minvs Salvtaris Qvam Festiuus de optimo reip. statu, deq[ue] noua Insula Vtopia authore clarissimo viro Thoma Moro inclytæ ciuitatis Londinensis ciue & vicecomite cura M. Petri Aegidii Antuerpie[n]sis, & arte Theodorici Martini Alustensis, Typographi almæ Louaniensium Academiæ nunc primum accuratissime editus. Louvain: Martini, 1516.Google Scholar

Münster, Sebastian. Organum Uranicum: Habes in hoc Libro Amice Lector, Explicatas Theoricas Omnium planetaru[m], atq[ue] eorunde[m] varios, singulos & quotidianos ad annos usq[ue] & ultra expressos motus, Lunæ quoq[ue] in lumine crescentis, senesce[n]tis & per eclipsim deficientis, & item Solis deliquiu[m] patientis, omne[s] varietate[s] quibus omnibus comodi adiecti sunt canones. Basel: Petri, 1536.Google Scholar

Ovidius Naso, Publius. P. Ouidii Nasonis Metamorphoseon Libri XV. Index Repertorius, Omniu[m] Fabularum, Ad Numerum Chartarum, & Seriem Alphabeti, Illis [a]Ppositus Est. Strasbourg: Schott, 1515.Google Scholar

Pelerin, Jean. Von der Kunst Perspectiva. Nuremberg: Georg Glockendon, 1509.Google Scholar

Regiomontanus, Johannes. Calendarium… Dvctv Ioannis De Monteregio. Nuremberg: Johannes Regiomontanus, 1474.Google Scholar

Regiomontanus, Johannes. Kalendarius Johannis Künigspergers: News und Volmon … Eyn schön Vergleichung der Astronomi mit der Artznei. Strasbourg: Cammerlander, 1532.Google Scholar

Regiomontanus, Johannes and Schöner, Johannes. Scripta clarissimi mathematici M. Ioannis Regiomontani, de torqueto, astrolabio armillari, regula magna ptolemaica, baculo[que] astronomico, &amp; observationibus cometarum, aucta necessariis, Ioannis Schoneri … additionibus. Item observationes motuum solis, ac stellarum tam fixarum [qua …] erraticarum. Item libellus M. Georgii Purbachii de quadrato geometrico. Nuremberg: Joannis Montanus and Ulricus Neuber, 1544.Google Scholar

Reisch, Gregorius. Margarita Philosophica. Strasbourg: Johannes Schott, 1504.Google Scholar

Rößlin, d.J., Eucharius. Kalender mit allen As=‖stronomischen haltungen. Von natürlichem Jnfluß der Gestirrn/‖ Planeten vnd Zeychen … ‖ ASTROLABIVM TETRAGONON.‖ Ein gar kunstlich Astrolabium/ Alle wirck‖ungen des Firmaments … zefindenn. Durch … ‖ D.Eucharium Rößlin/ Statartzt zů Franck‖furt am Meyn/ New añ tag geben.‖ Register … zů end des Kalenders. Ed. Stöffler, Johannes. Frankfurt: Christian Egenolff d.Ä., 1533.Google Scholar

Sacrobosco, Johannes de. Ioannis De Sacrobusto Libellus, De Sphaera: Eiusdem Autoris Libellus, Cuius Titulus Est Computus, Eruditißimam Anni & Mensium Descriptionem Continens. Ed. Melanchthon, Philipp. Wittenberg: Jospeh Clug, 1538.Google Scholar

Sacrobosco, Johannes de. Sphaera Mundi: Eyn Anfang und Fundament der Astronomi/ Aus den Alten Astronomis dur Johannem de Sacro Busto ins Latin Zusamen Gesetzt und Nachmals Durch M. Cunrad Heynfogel von Nuremberg Verteutscht/ Unnd in Vier Teyl Getylt/ Deß Himmels Lauff Sampt Allem Gestirn/ Leichtlicher auß den bei Gesatzten Figuren Zuerlernen. Ed. Heinfogel, Conrad. Strasbourg: Cammerlander, 1539.Google Scholar

Sacrobosco, Johannes de. Sphera Materialis: Eyn Anfang und Fundanment der Astronomi. Ed. Cammerlander, Jakob and Heinfogel, Conrad. Strasbourg: Cammerlander, 1533.Google Scholar

Sacrobosco, Johannes de and Apian, Peter. Sphaera Iani de Sacrobusto astronomiae ac cosmographiae candidatis scitu apprime necessaria. Ingoldstadt: Peter and Georg Apian, 1526.Google Scholar

Sacrobosco, Johannes Regiomontanus and von Peuerbach, Georg. Spaerae Mvndi Co[m]pendiu[m] Foeliciter Inchoat.: Daran: Regiomontanus, Johannes: Disputationes contra Cremonensia in planetarum theoricas deliramenta. Mit Widmungsvorrede des Autors an die Gelehrten. – Peuerbach, Georg: Theoricae novae planetarum. Mit Gedicht auf die Drucker’Uranie quantum quantum … Venice: Johannes Lucilius Santritter and Hieronymus de Sanctis, 1488.Google Scholar

Solinus, Caius Julius, Camers, Joannes, and Singriener, Johann. Joannis Camertis … in C Julii Solini Polyistora Enarrationes. Additus Eiusdem Camertis Index. Vienna: Alantse, 1520.Google Scholar

Stelluti, Francesco. Della Fisonomia di Tvtto il Corpo Hvmano del S. Gio. Batta Della Porta. Acc. Linceo Libri Quattro Ne’ Quali Si Tratta di Quanto Intorno a Questa Materia n’ Hanno i Greci, Latini,e gli Arabi Schritto: Hora Bruemente in Tauole Sinottiche Ridotta et Ordinata. Rome: Mascardi, 1637.Google Scholar

Tannstetter, Georg, Apian, Petrus, and Witelo, . Vitellionis Ma/‖thematici Doctissimi Peri Optikēs,‖ Id Est de Natura, Ratione, & Proiectione Radiorum Uisus, Lu=‖minum, Colorum At# Formarum, Quam Uul=‖go Perspectiuam Uocant,‖ LIBRI X.‖ … Omnia Ab Hoc Autore … ‖ Diligentissime Tradita … ‖ Nunc Primum Opera Mathematico# Praestantiss.Dd.Ge-‖orgij Tanstetter & Petri Apiani in Lucem Aedita.‖. Nuremberg: Johann Petreius, 1535.Google Scholar

Vogtherr, Heinrich. Ein Frembds und wunderbars Kunstbüchlin allen Molern, Bildschnitzern, Goldschmiden, Steinmetzen, Schreinern, Platnern, Waffen und Messerschmiden hochnutzlich zu gebrauchen. Strasbourg: Vogtherr, 1537.Google Scholar

Vogtherr, Heinrich. Ein newes hochnutzlichs Büchlin von Erkantnüs der Kranckeyten der Augen sampt einer Figur oder Anothomia eines Augs: wie es innwendig gestaltet, volget in der andern Colum: auch Erklärung der selbigen mit Anzeigung viler nutzlicher undbewerter Hülff als Purgation, Pflaster, Collirien, Sieff, Pulver, Salben und Augenwassern wie mans machen und gebrauchen soll, einem jeden Hausshalt nutzlich. Strasbourg: Heinrichen Vogtherr, 1538.Google Scholar

Vogtherr, Heinrich. Ein Wolgegrindtes Kunstreichs Sumari Büchlin Aller Sonnen Uur Uff Acht Oder Viereckette Stecklen, Innbuchsen, Zylinder u. Guldine Ring, Auch Uff Glaß, Alle Mauren Schreg Oder Unschreg Zu Machen … Strasbourg: Vogtherr, 1539.Google Scholar

Alpers, Svetlana. The Art of Describing: Dutch Art in the Seventeenth Century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Andrews, Noam. “Albrecht Dürer’s Personal Underweysung der Messung.” Word & Image 32, no. 4 (2016): 409–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andrews, Noam. The Polyhedrists: Art and Geometry in the Long Sixteenth Century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2022.Google Scholar

Areford, David S. The Viewer and the Printed Image in Late Medieval Europe. Farnham and Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2010.Google Scholar

Areford, David S. and Rowe, Nina A., eds. Excavating the Medieval Image. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004.Google Scholar

Ashcroft, Jeffrey. “Black Arts: Renaissance and Printing Press in Nuremberg, 1493–1528.” Forum for Modern Language Studies 45, no. 1 (2008): 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baigrie, Brian Scott, ed. Picturing Knowledge: Historical and Philosophical Problems Concerning the Use of Art in Science. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baldasso, Renzo. “Illustrating the Book of Nature in the Renaissance: Drawing, Painting, and Printing Geometric Diagrams and Scientific Figures.” PhD dissertation, Columbia University, 2007.Google Scholar

Baldasso, Renzo. “The Role of Visual Representation in the Scientific Revolution: A Historiographic Inquiry.” Centaurus 48 (2006): 69–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Balfe, Thomas, Woodall, Joanna, and Zittel, Claus. Ad Vivum?: Visual Materials and the Vocabulary of Life-Likeness in Europe before 1800. Leiden: Brill, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnes, Robin Bruce. Astrology and Reformation. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Bauer, Barbara. “Die Rolle des Hofastrologen und Hofmathematicus als fürstlicher Berater.” In Buck, August, ed., Höfischer Humanismus. Weinheim: Acta Humaniora, 1989.Google Scholar

Baxandall, Michael. The Limewood Sculptors of Renaissance Germany. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Baxandall, Michael. Painting and Experience in Fifteenth Century Italy: A Primer in the Social History of Pictorial Style. 2nd edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Bennett, Jim. “Practical Geometry and Operative Knowledge.” Configurations: A Journal of Literature, Science and Technology 6 (1998): 195–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Besse, Jean-Marc. “Cosmography and Geography in the Sixteenth Century: The Position of Oronce Fine between Mathematics and History.” In Marr, Alexander, ed., The Worlds of Oronce Fine: Mathematics, Instruments and Print in Renaissance France. Donington: Shaun Tyas, 2009.Google Scholar

Besse, Jean-Marc. “Mapping, Constructing, Inventing: On the Notion of Project and Its Epistemology.” First published in Le Gout du monde: Exercises de paysage. Arles: Actes Sud/ENSP, 2009.Google Scholar

Bishop, Malcom. “Ambrosius Holbein’s Memento Mori Map for Sir Thomas More’s Utopia: The Meanings of a Masterpiece of Early Sixteenth Century Graphic Art.” British Dental Journal 199, no. 2 (2005): 107–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blair, Ann. “Humanist Methods in Natural Philosophy: The Commonplace Book.” Journal of the History of Ideas 53, no. 4 (1992): 541–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blair, Ann. Too Much to Know: Managing Scholarly Information before the Modern Age. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Blanchard, Donald L. “Vogtherr’s Büchlin.” Documenta Ophthalmologica 93 (1997): 73–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bleichmar, Daniela. Visible Empire: Botanical Expeditions and Visual Culture in the Hispanic Enlightenment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boas, Marie. The Scientific Renaissance 1450–1630. New York: Harper and Row, 1962.Google Scholar

Bontea, Adriana. “Montaigne’s On Physiognomy.” Renaissance Studies, 22, no. 1 (2008): 41–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boon, Karel G. “Frans Crabbe en de Monogrammist A.C.” In De Gulden Passer 52. Antwerp: Nederlandse Boekhandel, 1974.Google Scholar

Bredekamp, Horst. “A Neglected Tradition? Art History as Bildwissenschaft.” Critical Inquiry 29, no. 3 (2003): 418–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bredekamp, Horst. The Technical Image: A History of Styles in Scientific Imagery. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bredekamp, Horst and Schneider, Pablo. Visuelle Argumentationen: die Mysterien der Reprasentation und die Berechenbarkeit der Welt. Munich: Wilhelm Fink, 2006.Google Scholar

Bredekamp, Horst, Dünkel, Vera, and Schneider, Birgit. Das Technische Bild: Kompendium zu einer Stilgeschichte wissenschaftlicher Bilder. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2012.Google Scholar

Britton, Piers D. G. “The Signs of Faces: Leonardo on Physiognomic Science and the ‘Four Universal States of Man.’” Renaissance Studies 16, no. 2 (2002): 143–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brosseder, Claudia. Im Bann der Sterne: Caspar Peucer, Philipp Melanchthon und andere Wittenberger Astrologen. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brosseder, Claudia. “The Writing in the Wittenberg Sky: Astrology in Sixteenth-Century Germany.” Journal of the History of Ideas 66 (2005): 557–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Browne, Thomas. Religio medici. Ed. Denonian, Jean-Jacques. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1953.Google Scholar

Brunner, Horst, Löser, Freimut, and Klein, Dorothea, eds. Überlieferungsgeschichte transdisziplinär: neue Perspektiven auf ein germanistisches Forschungsparadigma. Wiesbaden: Dr. Ludwig Reichert Verlag, 2016.Google Scholar

Buck, Stephanie et al. Holbein, 1497–1543. Cologne: Könemann, 1999.Google Scholar

Buren, Anne H. van and Edmunds, Sheila. “Playing Cards and Manuscripts: Some Widely Disseminated Fifteenth-Century Model Sheets.” Art Bulletin 56, no. 1 (1974): 12–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burke, Peter. Eyewitnessing: The Uses of Images as Historical Evidence. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Paperbacks, 2008.Google Scholar

Burkhardt, Johannes and Häberlein, Mark, eds. Die Welser: Neue Forschungen zur Geschichte und Kultur des oberdeutschen Handelshauses. Berlin: Akademie, 2002.Google Scholar

Cashion, Debra Taylor, Luttikhuizen, Henry, and West, Ashley D., eds. The Primacy of the Image in Northern European Art, 1400–1700: Essays in Honor of Larry Silver. Leiden: Brill, 2017.Google Scholar

Catteneo, Angelo. “Map Projections and Perspective in the Renaissance.” In Shalev, Zur and Burnett, Charles, eds., Ptolemy’s Geography in the Renaissance. Warburg Institute Colloquia. London: Warburg Institute, 2011.Google Scholar

Challenger, Alexandra. “Printing the Cosmos: Images, Readers, and Mathematics in Peter Apian’s Instrumental Texts.” PhD dissertation, Florida State University, 2022.Google Scholar

Chojecka, Ewa. Bayerische Bild-Enzyklopädie: das Weltbild eines wissenschaftlich-magischen Hausbuches aus dem frühen 16. Jahrhundert. Studien zur Deutschen Kunstgeschichte, vol. 358. Baden-Baden: Verlag Valentin Koerner, 1982.Google Scholar

Chojecka, Ewa. “Zur Stellung des gedruckten Bildes im 15. und 16. Jahrhundert: Zwischen Kunstwerk und ‘Massenmedium.’” In Reform, Reformation, Revolution: Ausgewählte Beiträge einer wissenschaftlichen Konferenz in Leipzig am 10. und 11. Oktober 1977. Leipzig: Karl Marx Universität, 1980.Google Scholar

Chrisman, Miriam Usher. Lay Culture, Learned Culture: Books and Social Change in Strasbourg, 1480–1599. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, Stuart. Vanities of the Eye: Vision in Early Modern European Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Clayton, Martin. Leonardo da Vinci: The Divine and the Grotesque. London: Royal Collection, 2002.Google Scholar

Clayton, Martin. “Leonardo’s Gypsies, and the Wolf and the Eagle.” Apollo 155, no. 486 (2002): 27–33.Google Scholar

Clement, Taylor. “Moveable Types: The De-individuated Portrait in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction.” Renaissance Studies 31, no. 3 (2017): 383–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clod, Random. “Information on Information.” Text 5 (1991): 241–78.Google Scholar

Clough, Cecil. “Italian Renaissance Portraits and Printed Portrait Books.” In Reidy, Dennis V., ed., The Italian Book 1465–1800: Studies Presented to Dennis E. Rhodes on His 70th Birthday. London: British Library, 1993.Google Scholar

Colding Smith, Charlotte. Images of Islam, 1453–1600: Turks in Germany and Central Europe. London: Pickering and Chatto, 2014.Google Scholar

Coldiron, A. E. B. Printers Without Borders: Translation and Textuality in the Renaissance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coldiron, A. E. B. “Translation and Transformission; Or, Early Modernity in Motion.” Canadian Review of Comparative Literature / Revue Canadienne de Littérature Comparée 46, no. 2 (2019): 205–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Comisso, Giovanni, ed. Gli ambasciatori veneti, 1525–1792. Relazion di viaggio e di missione. Milan: Longanesi, 1985.Google Scholar

Conley, Tom. An Errant Eye: Poetry and Topography in Early Modern France. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conley, Tom. The Self-Made Map: Cartographic Writing in Early Modern France. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Conley, Tom. “A Topographer’s Eye: From Gilles Corrozet to Pieter Apian.” In Melion, Walter S. and Wandel, Lee Palmer, eds., Early Modern Eyes. Leiden: Brill, 2010.Google Scholar

Corbellini, Sabrina, Murano, Giovanna, and Signore, Giacomo. Collecting, Organizing and Transmitting Knowledge: Miscellanies in Late Medieval Europe. Turnhout: Brepols, 2018.Google Scholar

Cosgrove, Denis E. Apollo’s Eye: A Cartographic Genealogy of the Earth in the Western Imagination. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cosgrove, Denis E. “Images of Renaissance Cosmography.” In Woodward, David, ed., The History of Cartography. Volume 3: Cartography in the European Renaissance. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Cosgrove, Denis E. ed. Mappings. London: Reaktion Books, 1999.Google Scholar

Crisci, Edoardo and Pecere, Oronzo. Il codice miscellaneo: tipologie e funzioni: atti del convegno internazionale, Cassino 14–17 maggio 2003. Cassino: University of Cassino, 2004.Google Scholar

Crowther, Kathleen M. and Barker, Peter. “Training the Intelligent Eye: Understanding Illustrations in Early Modern Astronomy Texts.” Isis 104, no. 3 (2013): 429–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Crowther, Kathleen M., McCray, Ashley Nicole, McNeill, Leila, Rodgers, Amy, and Stein, Blair. “The Book Everybody Read: Vernacular Translations of Sacrobosco’s Sphere in the Sixteenth Century.” Journal for the History of Astronomy 46, no. 1 (2015): 4–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cuneo, Pia F. “Just a Bit of Control: The Historical Significance of Sixteenth- and Seventeenth-Century German Bit-Books.” In Raber, Karen, Tucker, Treva J., and Cuneo, Pia F., The Culture of the Horse: Status, Discipline, and Identity in the Early Modern World. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.Google Scholar

Cuneo, Pia F. and Stewart, Alison G., eds. Animals and Early Modern Identity. London: Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar

Cunningham, Andrew and Kusukawa, Sachiko. Natural Philosophy Epitomised: A Translation of Books 8–11 of Gregor Reisch’s Philosophical Pearl (1503). Farnham: Ashgate, 2010.Google Scholar

Dackerman, Susan. Prints and the Pursuit of Knowledge in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge, MA and New Haven, CT: Harvard Art Museums, 2011.Google Scholar

Damm, Heiko, Thimann, Michael, and Zittel, Claus, eds. The Artist as Reader: On Education and Non-Education of Early Modern Artists. Leiden and Boston, MA: Brill, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daston, Lorraine. “Epistemic Images.” In Payne, Alina Alexandra, Vision and Its Instruments: Art, Science, and Technology in Early Modern Europe. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Daston, Lorraine. “On Scientific Observation.” Isis 99, no. 1 (2008): 97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daston, Lorraine and Lunbeck, Elizabeth. Histories of Scientific Observation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Daston, Lorraine and Vidal, Fernando. The Moral Authority of Nature. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Daston, Lorraine and Galison, Peter. Objectivity. New York: Zone Books, 2007.Google Scholar

Davis, Natalie Zemon. The Return of Martin Guerre. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Dear, Peter Robert. Revolutionizing the Sciences: European Knowledge in Transition, 1500–1700. Oxford and London: Macmillan International Higher Education and Red Globe Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Dekker, Elly and Schmidt, Rudolf. “The Globes in Holbein’s Painting ‘The Ambassadors.’” Der Globusfreund: Bericht über das IX. Symposium der Internationalen Coronelli-Gesellschaft, Berlin, 3.–7. Oktober 1998 47–8 (1999): 19–52.Google Scholar

Deleuze, Gilles. “Postscript on the Societies of Control.” October (1992): 3–7.Google Scholar

Denucé, Jean. De Antwerpsche “Konstkamers”: Inventarissen van Kunstverzamelingen te Antwerpen in de 16e en 17e Eeuwen. Antwerp: De Sikkel, 1932.Google Scholar

Depuydt, Joost. “The Utopia Map by Abraham Ortelius: New Home – New Research.” De Gulden Passer: Tijdschrift voor Boek Wetenschap 97, no. 2 (2019): 242–6.Google Scholar

Desan, Philippe, ed. Humanism in Crisis: The Decline of the French Renaissance. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dodgson, Campbell. “Die Cäsarenköpfe, eine unbeschriebene Folge von Holzschnitten Hans Burgkmair d. Ä.” In Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Kunst, Bd. II. Augsburg: Benno Filser, 1928.Google Scholar

Draxler, Sonja and Lippitsch, Max E.. “Peter Apian and His Astronomicum Caesareum.” In Proceedings of the 2nd European History of Physics (EHoP) Conference. Pöllauberg: Living Edition, 2012.Google Scholar

Dupré, Sven, ed. Perspective as Practice: Renaissance Cultures of Optics. Turnhout: Brepols, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dupré, Sven, “Printing Practical Mathematics: Oronce Fine’s De speculo ustorio between Paper and Craft.” In Marr, Alexander, ed., The Worlds of Oronce Fine: Mathematics, Instruments, and Print in Renaissance France. Donington: Shaun Tyas, 2009.Google Scholar

Dupré, Sven, “Trading Luxury Glass, Picturing Collections and Consuming Objects of Knowledge in Early Seventeenth-Century Antwerp.” Intellectual History Review 20, no. 1 (2010): 53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dupré, Sven and Lüth, Christophery, eds. Silent Messengers: The Circulation of Material Objects of Knowledge in the Early Modern Low Countries. Berlin: Lit Verlag, 2012.Google Scholar

Dürer, Albrecht. The Painter’s Manual: A Manual of Measurement of Lines, Areas, and Solids by Means of Compass and Ruler Assembled by Albrecht Dürer for the Use of All Lovers of Art with Appropriate Illustrations Arranged to Be Printed in the Year MDXXV. The Literary Remains of Albrecht Dürer. New York: Abaris Books, 1977.Google Scholar

Dürer, Albrecht and Rupprich, Hans. Schriftlicher Nachlaß, vol. 2. Berlin: Deutscher Verein für Kunstwissenschaft, 1966.Google Scholar

Dürer, Albrecht, Hess, Daniel, and Eser, Thomas. Der frühe Dürer. Nuremberg: Verlag des Germanischen Nationalmuseums, 2012.Google Scholar

Dürer, Albrecht, Fuhse, Franz Louis, and Lange, Konrad. Dürers schriftlicher Nachlass auf Grund der Originalhandschriften und theilweise neu entdeckter alter Abschriften. Halle an der Saale: Niemeyer, 1893.Google Scholar

Eamon, William. Science and the Secrets of Nature: Books of Secrets in Medieval and Early Modern Culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Edgerton, Samuel Y. The Renaissance Rediscovery of Linear Perspective. New York: Basic Books, 1975.Google Scholar

Eisenstein, Elizabeth L. The Printing Press as an Agent of Change: Communications and Cultural Transformations in Early-Modern Europe. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Elkins, Jim. Visual Literacy. New York: Routledge, 2008.Google Scholar

Ellenbogen, Josh and Jolles, Adam. “Visual Literacy and 1960s Photography.” Critical Inquiry Critical Inquiry 47, no. 3 (2021): 565–91.Google Scholar

Emison, Patricia A. “Prolegomenon to the Study of Italian Renaissance Prints.” Word & Image 11, no. 1 (1995): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Enenkel, K. A. E. and Neuber, Wolfgang, eds. Cognition and the Book: Typologies of Formal Organisation of Knowledge in the Printed Book of the Early Modern Period. Leiden and Boston, MA: Brill, 2005.Google Scholar

Engammare, Max. Calendrier des bergers. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2008.Google Scholar

Eser, Thomas. “Ordnende Dinge in unordentlichen Zeiten die ‘kulturelle Gelegenheit’ des 16. Jahrhunderts.” In Eser, Thomas and Armer, Stephanie, eds., Luther, Kolumbus und die Folgen: Welt im Wandel 1500–1600. Nuremberg: Germanisches Nationalmuseum, 2017.Google Scholar

Eser, Thomas. Schiefe Bilder – die Zimmernsche Anamorphose und andere Augenspiele aus den Sammlungen des Germanischen Nationalmuseums. Nuremberg: Verlag des Germanischen Nationalmuseums, 1998.Google Scholar

Falk, Tilman, Lübbeke, Isolde, and Biedermann, Rolf. Hans Burgkmair: 1473–1973: Das Graphische Werk. Augsburg: Städtische Kunstsammlungen, 1973.Google Scholar

Farago, Claire J. Reframing the Renaissance: Visual Culture in Europe and Latin America, 1450–1650. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Farago, Claire J., Bell, Janis Callen, Vecce, Carlo, and Kemp, Martin. The Fabrication of Leonardo da Vinci’s Trattato della Pittura, with a Scholarly Edition of the Editio Princeps (1651) and an Annotated English Translation. Leiden and Boston, MA: Brill, 2018.Google Scholar

Ferckel, Christian. “Eine Bilderhandschrift v. J. 1524.” Mitteilungen zur Geschichte der Medizin und der Naturwissenschaften 12. Leipzig and Hamburg: Leopold Voss Verlag, 1913.Google Scholar

Ferrari, Michele C. Le monde en images: Deux encyclopédies manuscrites à Erlangen et à Cracovie. Art de l’enluminure 76. Dijon: Éditions Faton, 2021.Google Scholar

Findlen, Paula. Possessing Nature: Museums, Collecting, and Scientific Culture in Early Modern Italy. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel et al. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France 1978–79. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Vintage Books, 1994.Google Scholar

Fransen, Sietske. “Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, His Images and Draughtsmen.” Perspectives on Science 27, no. 3 (2019): 485–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freedberg, David. The Eye of the Lynx: Galileo, His Friends, and the Beginnings of Modern Natural History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedländer, M. “Nicolas Hogenberg und Frans Crabbe die Maler von Mechelen.” Jahrbuch der Preuszischen Kunstsammlungen 42, no. 4 (1921): 161–8.Google Scholar

Friedrich, Michael and Schwarke, Cosima. One-Volume Libraries: Composite and Multiple-Text Manuscripts. Berlin and Boston, MA: De Gruyter, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Funke, Jutta. “Beiträge zum graphischen Werk Heinrich Vogtherrs d.Ä.” Dissertation, Freie Universität, Berlin, 1967.Google Scholar

Gagel, Hanna, ed., Der Mensch um 1500: Werke aus Kirchen und Kunstkammern, 2nd edition. Berlin: Felgentreff & Goebel, 1977.Google Scholar

Gaida, Margaret. “Reading Cosmographia: Peter Apian’s Book-Instrument Hybrid and the Rise of the Mathematical Amateur in the Sixteenth Century.” Early Science and Medicine 21, no. 4 (2016): 277–302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gastel, Joris van, Hadjinicolaou, Tannis, and Rath, Markus, eds. Paragone als Mitstreit. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2014.Google Scholar

Gaudio, Michael. The Bible and the Printed Image in Early Modern England: Little Gidding and the Pursuit of Scriptural Harmony. New York: Routledge, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gaudio, Michael. Engraving the Savage: The New World and Techniques of Civilization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Gelfand, Laura Deborah and Blick, Sarah, eds. Push Me, Pull You: Physical and Spatial Interaction in Late Medieval and Renaissance Art. Leiden and Boston, MA: Brill, 2011.Google Scholar

Gessner, Samuel. “The Perspective of the Instrument Maker: The Planispheric Projection with Gemma Frisius and the Arsenius Workshop at Louvain.” In Dupré, Sven, ed., Perspective as Practice: Renaissance Cultures of Optics. Turnhout: Brepols, 2019.Google Scholar

Gessner, Samuel. “The Use of Printed Images for Instrument-Making at the Arsenius Workshop.” In Jardine, Nicholas and Fay, Isla, Observing the World through Images: Diagrams and Figures in the Early-Modern Arts and Sciences. Leiden and Boston, MA: Brill, 2014.Google Scholar

Gingerich, Owen. “Astronomical Paper Instruments with Moving Parts.” In Anderson, Robert, Bennett, Jim, and Ryan, W. F., eds., Making Instruments Count: Essays on Historical Scientific Instruments Presented to Gerard L’Estrange Turner. Aldershot: Variorum, 1993.Google Scholar

Gingerich, Owen. “Sacrobosco as a Textbook.” Journal for the History of Astronomy 19, no. 4 (1988): 269–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gordon, Andrew and Klein, Bernhard. Literature, Mapping, and the Politics of Space in Early Modern Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Grafton, Anthony. Commerce with the Classics: Ancient Books and Renaissance Readers. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grafton, Anthony. “Some Uses of Eclipses in Early Modern Chronology.” Journal of the History of Ideas 64, no. 2 (2003): 213–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Green, Jonathan. Printing and Prophecy: Prognostication and Media Change 1450–1550. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Greenblatt, Stephen Jay. Renaissance Self-Fashioning from More to Shakespeare. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grimm, Melanie, Kleine-Tebbe, Claudia, and Stijnman, Ad. Lichtspiel und Farbenpracht: Entwicklungen des Farbdrucks 1500–1800: aus den Beständen der Herzog-August-Bibliothek. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2011.Google Scholar

Groebner, Valentin. “Complexio/Complexion: Categorizing Individual Natures, 1250–1600.” In Daston, Lorraine and Vidal, Fernando, The Moral Authority of Nature. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Grotefend, H. Christian Egenolff der erste ständige Buchdrucker zu Frankfurt a. M. Frankfurt: K. T. Völcker’s Verlag, 1881.Google Scholar

Haag, Sabine et al., eds. Die Kunstkammer: die Schätze der Habsburger. Vienna: Brandstätter Verlag, 2012.Google Scholar

Hall, Bert S. “Der Meister sol auch kennen schreiben und lesen: Writings about Technology ca. 1400–ca. 1600 AD and Their Cultural Implication.” In Schmandt-Besserat, Denise, Early Technologies. Malibu, CA: Undena Publications, 1979.Google Scholar

Hamel, Jürgen. Studien zur “Sphaera” des Johannes de Sacrobosco. Leipzig: Akademische Verlagsanstalt, 2014.Google Scholar

Hardman, Phillipa and Bradbury, Nicola. Medieval and Early Modern Miscellanies and Anthologies.The Yearbook of English Studies, vol. 33. Leeds: Maney Publishing for the Modern Humanities Research Association, 2003.Google Scholar

Haskell, Francis. History and Its Images: Art and the Interpretation of the Past. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Hayton, Darin. The Crown and the Cosmos. Astrology and the Politics of Maximilian I. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heesen, Anke te. The World in a Box: The Story of an Eighteenth-Century Picture Encyclopedia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Heitzmann, Christian. Die Sterne Lügen Nicht: Astrologie und Astronomie im Mittelalter und in der Frühen Neuzeit. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2008.Google Scholar

Henry, Chriscinda. “Leonardo da Vinci, Parody, and Pictorial Magic.” In Levy, Allison M., ed., Playthings in Early Modernity: Party Games, Word Games, Mind Games. Kalamazoo: Medieval Institute Publications, Western Michigan University, 2017.Google Scholar

Herrmann, F. “Der Astrolog Johannes Indagine, Pfarrer zu Steinheim a.M., und die Frankfurter Kaiserwahl des Jahres 1519.” Archiv für Hessische Geschichte und Alterthumskunde 18 (1934): 274–91.Google Scholar

Hindman, Sandra. The Early Illustrated Book Essays in Honor of Lessing Julius Rosenwald. Washington, DC: Library of Congress, 1982.Google Scholar

Hofmann, Werner. Köpfe der Lutherzeit. Munich: Prestel, 1983.Google Scholar

Holländer, Hans, ed. Erkenntnis, Erfindung, Konstruktion: Studien zur Bildgeschichte von Naturwissenschaften und Technik von 16. bis zum 19. Jahrhundert. Berlin: Gebr. Mann, 2000.Google Scholar

Hollstein, F. W. H. et al. Hollstein’s German Engravings Etchings and Woodcuts 1400–1700, vol. 30. Amsterdam: M. Hertzberger, 1991.Google Scholar

Hoogstede, Luuk et al. Hieronymus Bosch, Painter and Draughtsman: Technical Studies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Hoskin, Michael, ed. The Cambridge Concise History of Astronomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Ivins, William Mills. Prints and Visual Communication. New York: Da Capo Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Jardine, Nicholas and Fay, Isla. Observing the World through Images: Diagrams and Figures in the Early-Modern Arts and Sciences. Leiden and Boston, MA: Brill, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jaumann, Herbert. Handbuch Gelehrtenkultur der frühen Neuzeit. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2004.Google Scholar

Johns, Adrian. The Nature of the Book: Print and Knowledge in the Making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Johns, Adrian. “The Uses of Print in the History of Science.” Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 107, no. 4 (2013): 393–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, Christine R. The German Discovery of the World: Renaissance Encounters with the Strange and Marvelous. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Johnston, Sky Michael. “Printing the Weather: Knowledge, Nature, and Popular Culture in Two Sixteenth-Century German Weather Books.” Renaissance Quarterly 73, no. 2 (2020): 391–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, Alexander. Ptolemy in Perspective: Use and Criticism of His Work from Antiquity to the Nineteenth Century. Dordrecht: Springer, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karr Schmidt, Suzanne Kathleen. “Art – A User’s Guide: Interactive and Sculptural Printmaking in the Renaissance.” PhD dissertation, Yale University, 2006.Google Scholar

Karr Schmidt, Suzanne Kathleen. Interactive and Sculptural Printmaking in the Renaissance. Leiden and Boston, MA: Brill, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karr Schmidt, Suzanne Kathleen. “Memento Mori: The Deadly Art of Interaction.” In Gelfand, Laura Deborah and Blick, Sarah, eds., Push Me, Pull You: Imaginative and Emotional Interaction in Late Medieval and Renaissance Art. Leiden and Boston, MA: Brill, 2011.Google Scholar

Karr Schmidt, Suzanne and Nichols, Kimberly. Altered and Adorned: Using Renaissance Prints in Daily Life. Chicago and New Haven, CT: Art Institute of Chicago, distributed by Yale University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Karr Schmidt, Suzanne Kathleen and Wouk, Edward H.. Prints in Translation, 1450–1750: Image, Materiality, Space. Abingdon: Routledge, 2017.Google Scholar

Kaune, Daniel. “Vom Grenzstein zum Augenschein: von der Essenz und Relevanz eines Kartentypus.” BA/MA thesis, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universität, Hannover, n.d.Google Scholar

Kemp, Martin. “Temples of the Body and Temples of the Cosmos: Vision and Visualization in the Vesalian and Copernican Revolutions.” In Baigrie, Brian Scott, ed., Picturing Knowledge: Historical and Philosophical Problems Concerning the Use of Art in Science. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Kinsman, Robert Starr. The Darker Vision of the Renaissance: Beyond the Fields of Reason. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kinsman, Robert Starr. “Folly, Melancholy, and Madness: A Study in the Shifting Styles of Medical Analysis and Treatment, 1450–1675.” In Kinsman, Robert Starr, The Darker Vision of the Renaissance: Beyond the Fields of Reason. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klein, Alice. “Hans Wechtlin and the Production of German Colour Woodcuts.” In Stijnman, Ad and Savage, Elizabeth, eds., Printing Colour 1400–1700: History, Techniques, Functions and Receptions. Leiden: Brill, 2015.Google Scholar

Klein, Alice. “Hans Wechtlin, peintre à Strasbourg à la veille de la Réforme.” PhD dissertation, Université Paris-Sorbonne, 2014.Google Scholar

Klein, M. “Les Physiognomistes haut-rhénans du XVIe siècle.” In Atti del XIV Congresso internazionale di storia della medicina sotto l’Alto Patronato del Presidente della Repubblica, Roma – Salerno, 13–20 settembre 1954. Rome: Guerra & Belli, 1960.Google Scholar

Klibansky, Raymond, Panofsky, Erwin, and Saxl, Fritz. Saturn and Melancholy: Studies in the History of Natural Philosophy, Religion, and Art. New York: Basic Books, 1964.Google Scholar

Klinger Aleci, Linda. “Images of Identity: Italian Portrait Collections of the Fifteenth and Sixteenth Centuries.” In Mann, Nicholas and Syson, Luke, eds., The Image of the Individual: Portraits in the Renaissance. London: British Museum Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Klinger, Linda Susan. The Portrait Collection of Paolo Giovio. Ann Arbor: UMI Dissertation Services, 2003.Google Scholar

Koerner, Joseph Leo. The Moment of Self-Portraiture in German Renaissance Art. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Kohl, Jeanette and Olariu, Dominic. “En face: seven essays on the human face.” In Kritische Berichte: Zeitschrift für Kunst- und Kulturwissenschaften 40. Marburg: Jonas Verlag, 2012.Google Scholar

Korner, Hans. Der früheste deutsche Einblattholzschnitt. Munich: Mäander Kunstverlag, 1979.Google Scholar

Kremer, Richard L. “Incunable Almanacs and Practica as Practical Knowledge Produced in Trading Zones.” In Valleriani, Matteo, ed., The Structures of Practical Knowledge. Cham: Springer, 2017.Google Scholar

Kremer, Richard L. “Playing with Geometrical Tools: Johannes Stabius’s Astrolabium Imperatorium (1515) and Its Successors.” CNT Centaurus 58, nos. 1–2 (2016): 104–34.Google Scholar

Kruyfhooft, Cécile. “A Recent Discovery: Utopia by Abraham Ortelius.” Map Collector 16 (1981): 10–14.Google Scholar

Küchler, Susanne and Melion, Walter S.. Images of Memory: On Remembering and Representation. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Kuhoff, Wolfgang. “Markus Welser als Erforscher des römischen Augsburg.” In Burkhardt, Johannes and Häberlein, Mark, eds., Die Welser: Neue Forschungen zur Geschichte und Kultur des oberdeutschen Handelshauses. Berlin: Akademie, 2002.Google Scholar

Kusukawa, Sachiko. “Leonhart Fuchs on the Importance of Pictures.” Journal of the History of Ideas 58, no. 3 (1997): 403–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kusukawa, Sachiko. Picturing the Book of Nature: Image, Text, and Argument in Sixteenth-Century Human Anatomy and Medical Botany. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Kusukawa, Sachiko. The Transformation of Natural Philosophy: The Case of Philip Melanchthon. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kusukawa, Sachiko and Maclean, Ian. Transmitting Knowledge: Words, Images, and Instruments in Early Modern Europe. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Kwakkelstein, Michael W. Leonardo da Vinci as a Physiognomist: Theory and Drawing Practice. Leiden: Primavers Pers, 2014.Google Scholar

Kwakkelstein, Michael W. “Leonardo da Vinci’s Recurrent Use of Patterns of Individual Limbs, Stock Poses and Facial Stereotypes.” In Ciulisova, I., ed., Artistic Innovations and Cultural Zones. Spectrum Slovakia 7. Berlin: Peter Lang, 2015.Google Scholar

Kwakkelstein, Michael W. “The Lost Book on ‘Moti Mentali.’” In Farago, Claire J., Leonardo’s Writings and Theory of Art. New York: Garland, 1999.Google Scholar

Landau, David and Parshall, Peter W.. The Renaissance Print, 1470–1550. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Lattis, James M. “Christopher Clavius and the ‘Sphere’ of Sacrobosco: The Roots of Jesuit Astronomy on the Eve of the Copernican Revolution.” PhD dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1989.Google Scholar

Laube, Reinhard and Zäh, Helmut, eds. Gesammeltes Gedächtnis: Konrad Peutinger und die kulturelle Überlieferung im 16. Jahrhundert. Lucerne: Quaternio Verlag, 2016.Google Scholar

Lefèvre, Wolfgang, ed. Picturing Machines, 1400–1700. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leibsohn, Dana and Peterson, Jeanette Favrot, eds. Seeing across Cultures in the Early Modern World. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2012.Google Scholar

Leitch, Stephanie. “Dürer’s Rhinoceros Underway: The Epistemology of the Copy in the Early Modern Print.” In Cashion, Debra Taylor, Luttikhuizen, Henry, and West, Ashley D., eds., The Primacy of the Image in Northern European Art, 1400–1700: Essays in Honor of Larry Silver. Leiden: Brill, 2017.Google Scholar

Leitch, Stephanie. Mapping Ethnography in Early Modern Germany: New Worlds in Print Culture. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leitch, Stephanie. “Visual Acuity and the Physiognomer’s Art of Observation.” Oxford Art Journal 38, no. 2 (2015): 187–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lester, Toby. The Fourth Part of the World: An Astonishing Epic of Global Discovery, Imperial Ambition and the Birth of America. New York: Free Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Lestringant, Frank. “The Crisis of Cosmography at the End of the Renaissance.” In Desan, Philippe, ed., Humanism in Crisis: The Decline of the French Renaissance. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Levy, Allison M., ed. Playthings in Early Modernity: Party Games, Word Games, Mind Games. Kalamazoo: Medieval Institute Publications, Western Michigan University, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lindberg, David Charles. “Alhazen’s Theory of Vision and Its Reception in the West.” Isis 58, no. 3 (1967): 321–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Loh, Maria H. “Renaissance Faciality.” Oxford Art Journal 32, no. 3 (2009): 341–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Long, Pamela O., McGee, David, and Stahl, Alan M., eds. The Book of Michael of Rhodes: A Fifteenth-Century Maritime Manuscript. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Lowe, Dunstan. “Suspending Disbelief Magnetic and Miraculous Levitation from Antiquity to the Middle Ages.” Classical Antiquity 35, no. 2 (2016): 247–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luther, Martin and de Wette, Wilhelm Martin Leberecht. Dr. Martin Luthers Briefe, Sendschreiben und Bedenken … Gesammelt, Kritisch und Historisch Bearbeitet von Dr W. M. L. de Wette. Berlin: Reimer, 1825.Google Scholar

Lüthy, Christoph and Smets, Alexis. “Words, Lines, Diagrams, Images: Towards a History of Scientific Imagery.” Early Science and Medicine 14 (2009): 398–439.Google Scholar

Lutze, Eberhard. Die Bilderhandschriften der Universitätsbibliothek Erlangen. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz, 1971.Google Scholar

MacDonald, Katherine. “Humanistic Self-Representation in Giovan Battista Della Porta’s ‘Della Fisonomia dell’Uomo’: Antecedents and Innovation.” Sixteenth Century Journal 36, no. 2 (2005): 397–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Machilek, Franz. “Astronomie und Astrologie: Sternforschung und Sternglaube im Verständnis von Johannes Regiomontanus und Benedikt Ellwanger.” Astronomie und Astrologie in der Frühen Neuzeit: Akten des Interdisziplinären Symposions 21, no. 22 (1990): 11–32.Google Scholar

Maier, Jessica. Rome Measured and Imagined: Early Modern Maps of the Eternal City. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maniaci, Marilena. “Miscellaneous Reflections on the Complexity of the Medieval Manuscripts.” In Corbellini, Sabrina, Murano, Giovanna, and Signore, Giacomo, Collecting, Organizing and Transmitting Knowledge: Miscellanies in Late Medieval Europe. Turnhout: Brepols, 2018.Google Scholar

Mann, Heinz Herbert. “Optische Instrumente.” In Holländer, Hans, ed., Erkenntnis, Erfindung, Konstruktion: Studien zur Bildgeschichte von Naturwissenschaften und Technik von 16. bis zum 19. Jahrhundert. Berlin: Gebr. Mann, 2000.Google Scholar

Marr, Alexander. “Copying, Commonplaces and Technical Knowledge: The Architect-Engineer as Reader.” In Damm, Heiko, Thimann, Michael, and Zittel, Claus, eds., The Artist as Reader: On Education and Non-Education of Early Modern Artists. Leiden and Boston, MA: Brill, 2013.Google Scholar

Marr, Alexander. “Ingenuity in Nuremberg: Dürer and Stabius’s Instrument Prints.” Art Bulletin 100, no. 3 (2018): 48–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marr, Alexander. “Knowing Images: A Review Essay.” Renaissance Quarterly 69, no. 3 (2016): 1000–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marr, Alexander. “Walther Ryff, Plagiarism and Imitation in Sixteenth Century Germany.” Print Quarterly 31, no. 2 (2014): 131–43.Google Scholar

Marr, Alexander. ed. The Worlds of Oronce Fine: Mathematics, Instruments, and Print in Renaissance France. Donington: Shaun Tyas, 2009.Google Scholar

Marr, Alexander and Heuer, Christopher P. “Introduction: The Uncertainty of Epistemic Images.” 21: Inquiries into Art, History, and the Visual 1, no. 2 (2020): 251–5.Google Scholar

Massey, Lyle. Picturing Space, Displacing Bodies: Anamorphosis in Early Modern Theories of Perspective. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

McDonald, Mark P. The Paper Museum of Cassiano dal Pozzo: A Catalogue Raisonné: Drawings and Prints in the Royal Library at Windsor Castle, the British Museum, the Institut de France and Others Collections. Series C – Prints Part One: Ceremonies, Costumes, Portraits and Genre. London: Harvey Miller, 2017.Google Scholar

McDonald, Mark P. The Print Collection of Ferdinand Columbus: 1488–1539: A Renaissance Collector in Seville. London: British Museum Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Melion, Walter and Wandel, Lee Palmer, eds. Early Modern Eyes. Leiden: Brill, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merback, Mitchell B. Perfection’s Therapy: An Essay on Albrecht Dürer’s Melencolia I. New York: Zone Books, 2017.Google Scholar

Merback, Mitchell B. “Recognitions: Theme and Metatheme in Hans Burgkmair the Elder’s Santa Croce in Gerusalemme of 1504.” Art Bulletin 96, no. 3 (2014): 288–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mertens, Sabine, Purpus, Elke, and Schneider, Cornelia. Blockbücher des Mittelalters: Bilderfolgen als Lektüre: Gutenberg-Museum, Mainz, 22. Juni 1991 bis 1. September 1991. Mainz am Rhein: von Zabern, 1991.Google Scholar

Metzger, Christoph. “‘Wie man den Menschen erkennen soll’: Neue Überlegungen zu den Charakterstudien Hans Schäufelins, mit einem Technologischen Anhang von Monika Strolz.” Jahrbuch des Kunsthistorischen Museums Wien 12 (2010): 8–39.Google Scholar

Meurer, Peter. “Cartography in the German Lands, 1450–1650.” In Woodward, David, ed., The History of Cartography. Volume 3: Cartography in the European Renaissance. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Miller, Clarence et al. Utopia. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Mitchell, W. J. Thomas. Picture Theory: Essays on Verbal and Visual Representation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Montaigne, . The Essays of Michel de Montaigne. Trans. and ed. Screech, M. A.. London: Allen Lane, 1991.Google Scholar

Morrison, James E. The Astrolabe. Rehoboth Beach, DE: Janus, 2007.Google Scholar

Mosley, Adam. “The Cosmographer’s Role in the Sixteenth Century: A Preliminary Study.” Archives Internationales d’Histoire des Sciences 59 (2009): 424–39.Google Scholar

Mosley, Adam. “Early Modern Cosmography: Fine’s Sphaera Mundi in Content and Context.” In Marr, Alexander, ed., The Worlds of Oronce Fine: Mathematics, Instruments, and Print in Renaissance France. Donington: Shaun Tyas, 2009.Google Scholar

Moss, Ann. “Locating Knowledge.” In Enenkel, K. A. E. and Neuber, Wolfgang, eds., Cognition and the Book: Typologies of Formal Organisation of Knowledge in the Printed Book of the Early Modern Period. Leiden and Boston, MA: Brill, 2005.Google Scholar

Moss, Ann. Printed Commonplace-Books and the Structuring of Renaissance Thought. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Müller, Christian et al. Dürer, Holbein, Grünewald: Meisterzeichnungen der Deutschen Renaissance aus Berlin und Basel. Basel and Berlin: Offentliche Kunstsammlung, Staatlichen Museen, and Preussischer Kulturbesitz, 1997.Google Scholar

Müller, Christian Hans Holbein the Younger: The Basel Years, 1515–1532. Munich: Prestel, 2006.Google Scholar

Muller, Frank. Heinrich Vogtherr l’Ancien: un artiste entre Renaissance et Réforme. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1997.Google Scholar

Müller, Jan-Dirk. “Evidentia und Medialität. Zur Ausdifferenzierung von Evidenz in der Frühen-Neuzeit.” In Wimböck, Gabriele et al., eds., Evidentia. Reichweiten visueller Wahrnehmung in der Frühen Neuzeit. Berlin: Lit Verlag, 2007.Google Scholar

Müller-Jahncke, Wolf Dieter. “Melanchton und die Astrologie: Theoretisches und Mantisches.” In Günter, Frank and Rhein, Stefan, eds., Melanchthon und die Naturwissenschaften Seiner Zeit. Sigmaringen: Jan Thorbecke, 1998.Google Scholar

Mundy, Barbara E. The Mapping of New Spain: Indigenous Cartography and the Maps of the Relaciones Geográficas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Münkner, Jörn. Eingreifen und Begreifen: Handhabungen und Visualisierungen in Flugblättern der Frühen Neuzeit. Berlin: Erich Schmidt, 2008.Google Scholar

Nelson, Jennifer. “Directed Leering: Social Perspective in Erhard Schön’s Anamorphic Woodcuts.” Source: Notes in the History of Art 34, no. 4 (2015): 17–22.Google Scholar

Nelson, Jennifer. Disharmony of the Spheres: The Europe of Holbein’s Ambassadors. University Park: Pennsylvania State University, 2019.Google Scholar

Nichols, Stephen G. and Wenzel, Siegfried. The Whole Book: Cultural Perspectives on the Medieval Miscellany. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

North, John David. The Ambassadors’ Secret: Holbein and the World of the Renaissance. London: Phoenix, 2004.Google Scholar

Noyes, Ruth S. “Mattheus Greuter’s Sunspot Etchings for Galileo Galilei’s Macchie Solari (1613).” Art Bulletin 98, no. 4 (2016): 466–87.Google Scholar

Noyes, Ruth S. ed. Reassessing Epistemic Images in the Early Modern World. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2022.Google Scholar

Nuti, Lucia. “Mapping Places: Chorography and Vision in the Renaissance.” In Cosgrove, Denis E., ed., Mappings. London: Reaktion Books, 1999.Google Scholar

Ogilvie, Brian W. The Science of Describing: Natural History in Renaissance Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olariu, Dominic. “Herbs under Pressure: Plant Illustrations and Nature Printing in the First Half of the Fifteenth Century.” In Felfe, Robert and Saß, Maurice, Naturalismen. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2019.Google Scholar

Olariu, Dominic. The Misfortune of Philippus de Lignamine’s Herbal or New Research Perspectives in Herbal Illustrations from an Iconological Point of View. Berlin: Max-Planck-Institut für Wissenschaftsgeschichte, 2015.Google Scholar

Oldenbourg, Maria C. Die Buchholzschnitte des Hans Baldung Grien: Ein Bibliographisches Verzeichnis ihrer Verwendungen. Baden-Baden: Verlag Heitz, 1962.Google Scholar

Olson, Todd. “Markers: Le Moyne de Morgues in Sixteenth-Century Florida.” In Leibsohn, Dana and Peterson, Jeanette Favrot, eds., Seeing across Cultures in the Early Modern World. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2012.Google Scholar

Oosterhoff, Richard J. “A Book, a Pen, and the Sphere: Reading Sacrobosco in the Renaissance.” History of Universities 28, no. 2 (2015): 1–54.Google Scholar

Ortroy, Fernand van. Bibliographie de l’oeuvre de Pierre Apian. Amsterdam: Meridian, 1963.Google Scholar

Padron, Riccardo. “Mapping Imaginary Worlds.” In Ackerman, James et al., eds., Maps: Finding Our Place in the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Panofsky, Erwin. Life and Art of Albrecht Dürer. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995 [1943].Google Scholar

Panofsky, Erwin. Perspective as Symbolic Form. Trans. Christopher S. Wood. New York: Zone Books, 1991.Google Scholar

Panse, Melanie. Hans von Gersdorffs “Feldbuch der Wundarznei”: Produktion, Präsentation und Rezeption von Wissen. Wiesbaden: Reichert, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Park, Katherine. “Observation in the Margins, 500–1500.” In Daston, Lorraine and Lunbeck, Elizabeth, Histories of Scientific Observation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Parker, K. T. The Drawings of Hans Holbein in the Collection of His Majesty the King at Windsor Castle. Oxford: Phaidon Press, 1945.Google Scholar

Parshall, Peter. “The Art of Memory and the Passion.” Art Bulletin 81 (1999): 456–72.Google Scholar

Parshall, Peter. “Graphic Knowledge: Albrecht Dürer and the Imagination.” Art Bulletin 95, no. 3 (2013): 395–410.Google Scholar

Parshall, Peter. “Imago Contrafacta: Images and Facts in the Northern Renaissance.” Art History 16, no. 4 (1993): 554–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parshall, Peter. “Prints as Objects of Consumption in Early Modern Europe.” Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies 28, no. 1 (1998): 19–36.Google Scholar

Parshall, Peter. “The Print Collection of Ferdinand, Archduke of Tyrol.” Jahrbuch der Kunsthistorischen Sammlungen in Wien (1982): 139–90.Google Scholar

Parshall, Peter and Landau, David. The Renaissance Print 1470–1550. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Parshall, Peter and Schoch, Rainer. Origins of European Printmaking: Fifteenth-Century Woodcuts and Their Public. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Payne, Alina Alexandra. Vision and Its Instruments: Art, Science, and Technology in Early Modern Europe. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Pericolo, Lorenzo. “Knowing through the Eye: Leonardo da Vinci’s Imprensiva and Alhazen’s Intuitio.” Römisches Jahrbuch der Bibliotheca Hertziana 44 (2019–20): 205–61.Google Scholar

Perkinson, Stephen. “From an ‘Art de Memoire’ to the Art of Portraiture: Printed Effigy Books of the Sixteenth Century.” Sixteenth Century Journal 33, no. 3 (2002): 687–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perkinson, Stephen. “Likeness.” Studies in Iconography 33 (2012): 15–28.Google Scholar

Perkinson, Stephen. The Likeness of the King: A Prehistory of Portraiture in Late Medieval France. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perkinson, Stephen. “Portraits and Counterfeits: Villard de Honnecourt and Thirteenth-Century Theories of Representation.” In Areford, David S. and Rowe, Nina A., eds., Excavating the Medieval Image. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004.Google Scholar

Pfisterer, Ulrich. “Apelles im Norden: Ausnahme Künstler, Selbstbildnisse und die Gunst der Mächtigen um 1500.” In Müller, Matthias, ed., Apelles am Fürstenhof. Berlin: Coburger Landesstiftung, 2010.Google Scholar

Pinto, John A. “Origins and Development of the Ichnographic City Plan.” Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 35, no. 1 (1976): 35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pomata, Gianna. “Observation Rising: Birth of an Epistemic Genre, 1500–1650.” In Daston, Lorraine and Lunbeck, Elizabeth, Histories of Scientific Observation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Pon, Lisa. A Printed Icon: Forlì’s Madonna of the Fire. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Popplow, Marcus. “Why Draw Pictures of Machines?: The Social Contexts of Early Modern Machine Drawings.” In Lefèvre, Wolfgang, ed., Picturing Machines, 1400–1700. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Porras, Stephanie. “‘Ein freie hant’: Autonomy, Drawing and the Young Dürer.” In Dürer, Albrecht, Hess, Daniel, and Eser, Thomas, Der frühe Dürer. Nuremberg: Verlag des Germanischen Nationalmuseums, 2012.Google Scholar

Porter, Martin. Windows of the Soul Physiognomy in European Culture 1470–1780. Oxford: Clarendon Press and Oxford University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Price, David. In the Beginning Was the Image: Art and the Reformation Bible. New York: Oxford University Press, 2021.Google Scholar

Ptolemaeus, Claudius. Ptolemy’s Geography: An Annotated Translation of the Theoretical Chapters. Ed. Berggren, John L. and Jones, Alexander. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quicchelberg, Samuel, Meadow, Mark A., and Robertson, Bruce. The First Treatise on Museums: Samuel Quiccheberg’s Inscriptiones, 1565. Los Angeles: Getty Research Institute, 2013.Google Scholar

Raber, Karen, Tucker, Treva J., and Cuneo, Pia F.. The Culture of the Horse: Status, Discipline, and Identity in the Early Modern World. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ramachandran, Ayesha. The Worldmakers: Global Imagining in Early Modern Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rath, Markus. “Manipulation: Modellformung, Bildrelief und kubische Denkfigur als Moment des Mitstreits.” In Gastel, Joris van, Hadjinicolaou, Tannis, and Rath, Markus, eds., Paragone als Mitstreit. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2014.Google Scholar

Reeves, Eileen. Painting the Heavens: Art and Science in the Age of Galileo. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Reidy, Dennis V., ed. The Italian Book 1465–1800: Studies Presented to Dennis E. Rhodes on His 70th Birthday. London: British Library, 1993.Google Scholar

Reisser, Ulrich. “Physiognomik und Ausdruckstheorie der Renaissance: der Einfluss charakterologischer Lehren auf Kunst und Kunsttheorie des 15. und 16. Jahrhunderts.” Munich: Scaneg, 1997.Google Scholar

Remmert, Volker R. Picturing the Scientific Revolution. Philadelphia: Saint Joseph’s University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Remond, Jaya. “Artful Instruction: Pictorializing and Printing Artistic Knowledge in Early Modern Germany.” Word & Image 36, no. 2 (2020): 101–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Remond, Jaya. “Bodies of Knowledge: Movement, Variety and Imagination in a German Renaissance Art Primer.” In Beyer, Andreas and Cassegrain, Guillaume, eds., Mouvement. Bewegung. Berlin: Deutscher Kunstverlag, 2015.Google Scholar

Remond, Jaya. “The Kunstbüchlein: Printed Artists’ Manuals and the Transmission of Craft in Renaissance Germany.” PhD dissertation, Harvard University, 2014.Google Scholar

Rhodes, Neil and Sawday, Jonathan. The Renaissance Computer: Knowledge Technology in the First Age of Print. London and New York: Routledge, 2000.Google Scholar

Richter Sherman, Claire et al. Writing on Hands: Memory and Knowledge in Early Modern Europe. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Riello, Giorgio. “The World in a Book: The Creation of the Global in Sixteenth-Century European Costume Books.” Past & Present 242, no. 14 (2019): 281–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ritter, François. Histoire de l’imprimerie alsacienne aux 15e et 16e siècles. Strasbourg: Institut des Hautes Études Alsaciennes, 1955.Google Scholar

Roberts, Jane et al. Drawings by Holbein from the Court of Henry VIII: Fifty Drawings from the Collection of Her Majesty the Queen, Windsor Castle. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1988.Google Scholar

Ronsin, Albert, Monat, Pierre, and Vespucci, Amerigo. La fortune d’un nom: America: le baptême du Nouveau Monde à Saint-Dié-des-Vosges. Grenoble: J. Millon, 1991.Google Scholar

Roper, Lyndal. “‘The Common Man’, ‘The Common Good’, ‘Common Women’: Gender and Meaning in the German Reformation Commune.” In Wiesner, Merry E., Women and Gender in the Early Modern World: Critical Concepts in Women’s History. London: Routledge, 2016.Google Scholar

Rosen, Edward. Copernicus and His Successors. London: Hambledon Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Roth, Michael et al. Dürers Mutter: Schönheit, Alter und Tod im Bild der Renaissance. Berlin: Staatliche Museen zu Berlin and Nicolai, 2006.Google Scholar

Röttel, Karl. Peter Apian: Astronomie, Kosmographie und Mathematik am Beginn der Neuzeit: Mit Ausstellungskatalog. Buxheim: Polygon-Verlag, 1995.Google Scholar

Röttinger, Heinrich. “Hans Wechtlin.” Jahrbuch der Kunsthistorischen Sammlung der Allerhöchsten Kaiserhauses 27 (1907–9).Google Scholar

Röttinger, Heinrich. “Die Holzschnitte der Druckerei des Jakob Cammerlander in Straßburg.” Gutenberg-Jahrbuch 11 (1936): 125–40.Google Scholar

Rubiés, Joan-Pau. “Instructions for Travellers: Teaching the Eye to See.” In Rubiés, Joan-Pau, Travellers and Cosmographers: Studies in the History of Early Modern Travel and Ethnology. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007.Google Scholar

Rudolph, Pia. “Hausbücher. Bayerische Bild-Enzyklopädien.” In Bodemann, Ulrike et al. (eds.), Katalog der deutschsprachigen illustrierten Handschriften des Mittelalters (KdiH). Munich: C. H. Beck, 2015.Google Scholar

Rudy, Kathryn M. Rubrics, Images and Indulgences in Late Medieval Netherlandish Manuscripts. Leiden: Brill, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rupprich, Hans and Dürer, Albrecht. Schriftlicher Nachlass, vol. 1. Berlin: Deutscher Verein für Kunstwissenschaft, 1956.Google Scholar

Ryan, W. F. and Schmitt, Charles B.. Pseudo-Aristotle, the Secret of Secrets: Sources and Influences. London: Warburg Institute, University of London, 1982.Google Scholar

Sacré, Dirk, de Bom, Erik, Verbeke, Demmy, and Tournoy, Gilbert. Utopia & More: Thomas More, de Nederlanden en de utopische traditie: catalogus bij de tentoonstelling in de Leuvense Universiteitsbibliotheek, 20 oktober 2016–17 januari 2017. Louvain: Leuven University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

San Juan, Rose Marie. Vertiginous Mirrors: The Animation of the Visual Image and Early Modern Travel. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Sarton, George. The Appreciation of Ancient and Medieval Science during the Renaissance (1450–1600). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sauter, Michael J. The Spatial Reformation: Euclid between Man, Cosmos, and God. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sawday, Jonathan. The Machine Mind: Technology and Culture in the European Renaissance. London: Routledge, 2007.Google Scholar

Schauerte, Thomas Ulrich, ed. Deutschlands Auge & Ohr: Nürnberg als Medienzentrum der Reformationszeit. Nuremberg: Tümmel Verlag, 2015.Google Scholar

Scheller, Robert. A Survey of Medieval Model Books. Haarlem: De Erven F. Bohn, 1963.Google Scholar

Schenda, Rudolf. “Der ‘gemeine Mann’ und sein medikales Verhalten im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert.” In Telle, Joachim, ed., Pharmazie und der gemeine Mann: Hausarznei und Apotheke in der frühen Neuzeit: erläutert anhand deutscher Fachschriften der Herzog-August-Bibliothek Wolfenbüttel und pharmazeutischer Geräte des Deutschen Apotheken-Museums Heidelberg. Weinheim: VCH, Acta Humaniora, 1988.Google Scholar

Scher, Stephen K. The Currency of Fame: Portrait Medals of the Renaissance. New York: Abrams, 1994.Google Scholar

Scher, Stephen K. ed. Perspectives on the Renaissance Medal. New York: Garland Publishing and American Numismatic Society, 2000.Google Scholar

Schmandt-Besserat, Denise. Early Technologies. Malibu, CA: Undena Publications, 1979.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Jean-Claude. “Enzyklopädismus und Bild-Enzyklopädien im Mittelalter.” In the proceedings of Die Welt im Bild. Bildenzykopädien um 1500. Conference at Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen, July 13–15, 2022.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Jean-Claude. L’Histoire en lignes et en rondelles: les figures du temps chretien au Moyen Age. Wiesbaden: Reichert Verlag, 2015.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Jean-Claude. Penser par figure: du compas divin aux diagrammes magiques. Paris: Arkhê, 2019.Google Scholar

Schön, Erhard, Baer, Leo, and Zell, Christoph. Unterweisung der Proportion und Stellung der Possen, Nürnberg 1542. Frankfurt: J. Baer & Co., 1920.Google Scholar

Schöner, Christoph. Mathematik und Astronomie an der Universität Ingolstadt im 15. und 16. Jahrhundert. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schottenloher, Karl. “Die Druckprivilegien des 16. jahrhunderts.” Gutenberg Jahrbuch (1933): 89–110.Google Scholar

Schottenloher, Karl. Die Landshuter Buchdrucker des 16. Jahrhunderts. Nieuwkoop: B. de Graaf, 1967.Google Scholar

Scodel, Joshua. “The Affirmation of Paradox: A Reading of Montaigne’s ‘De La Phisionomie’ (III:12).” Yale French Studies 64 (1983): 209–37.Google Scholar

Shalev, Zur and Burnett, Charles, eds. Ptolemy’s Geography in the Renaissance. Warburg Institute Colloquia. London: Warburg Institute, 2011.Google Scholar

Shapin, Steven. Scientific Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Sherman, Claire Richter and Copenhaver, Brian P.. Writing on Hands: Memory and Knowledge in Early Modern Europe. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Shirley, John W. and Hoeniger, F. David, eds. Science and the Arts in the Renaissance. Washington, DC and London: Folger Shakespeare Library and Associated University Presses, 1985.Google Scholar

Shirley, Rodney W. The Mapping of the World: Early Printed World Maps, 1472–1700. Riverside, CT: Early World Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Silver, Larry. Art and Dis-Illusion in the Long Sixteenth Century. Leiden: Brill, 2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silver, Larry. “The Face Is Familiar: German Renaissance Portrait Multiples in Print and Medals.” Word & Image 19, no. 1 (2003): 6–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silver, Larry. “World of Wonders: Exotic Animals in European Imagery, 1515–1650.” In Cuneo, Pia F. and Stewart, Alison G., eds., Animals and Early Modern Identity. London: Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar

Smith, Bruce R. The Key of Green: Passion and Perception in Renaissance Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Smith, Jeffrey Chipps. “A Creative Moment: Thoughts on the Genesis of the German Portrait Medal.” In Scher, Stephen, ed., Perspectives on the Renaissance Medal. New York: Garland Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Smith, Jeffrey Chipps. ed. Visual Acuity and the Arts of Communication in Early Modern Germany. Abingdon: Routledge, 2018.Google Scholar

Smith, Pamela H. The Body of the Artisan: Art and Experience in the Scientific Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Smith, Pamela H. “Making as Knowing: Craft as Natural Philosophy.” In Smith, Pamela H., Meyers, Amy R. W., and Cook, Harold J., Ways of Making and Knowing: The Material Culture of Empirical Knowledge. New York: Bard Graduate Center, 2017.Google Scholar

Smith, Pamela H., Meyers, Amy R. W., and Cook, Harold J.. Ways of Making and Knowing: The Material Culture of Empirical Knowledge. New York: Bard Graduate Center, 2017.Google Scholar

Snyder, John P. “Map Projections in the Renaissance.” In Woodward, David, ed., The History of Cartography. Volume 3: Cartography in the European Renaissance. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Söll-Tauchert, Sabine. Hans Baldung Grien (1484/85–1545): Selbstbildnis und Selbstinszenierung. Cologne: Böhlau, 2010.Google Scholar

Sorce, Francesco. “Metafore in bianco e nero: Propaganda antiturca nelle stampe di Nicolò Nelli.” In Sorce, Francesco, ed., En Blanc et Noir: Studi in onore di Silvana Macchioni. Rome: Campisano Editore, 2007.Google Scholar

Spiller, Elizabeth. Science, Reading, and Renaissance Literature: The Art of Making Knowledge, 1580–1670. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Stafford, Barbara Maria. Artful Science: Enlightenment, Entertainment, and the Eclipse of Visual Education. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Stafford, Barbara MariaBody Criticism: Imaging the Unseen in Enlightenment Art and Medicine. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Stemmler, Joan K. “The Physiognomical Portraits of Johann Caspar Lavater.” Art Bulletin 75 (1993): 151–68.Google Scholar

Stephenson, Bruce, Bolt, Marvin, and Friedman, Anna Felicity. The Universe Unveiled: Instruments and Images through History. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Stewart, Alison G. Before Bruegel: Sebald Beham and the Origins of Peasant Festival Imaginery. Hampshire: Ashgate, 2008.Google Scholar

Stijnman, Ad and Savage, Elizabeth. Printing Colour 1400–1700: History, Techniques, Functions and Receptions. Boston, MA: Brill, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stock, Jan Van der, ed. In Search of Utopia: Art and Science in the Era of Thomas More. Leuven and Amsterdam: Davidsfonds Uitgeverij and Amsterdam University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Stoichita, Victor, Glasheen, Anne-Marie, and Pericolo, Lorenzo. The Self-Aware Image: An Insight into Early Modern Metapainting. London: Harvey Miller, 2015.Google Scholar

Stopp, Frederick J. The Emblems of the Altdorf Academy: Medals and Medal Orations, 1577–1626. London: Modern Humanities Research Association, 1974.Google Scholar

Strauss, Walter L. The Complete Drawings of Albrecht Dürer. Volume 3: 1510–1519. New York: Abaris, 1974.Google Scholar

Strauss, Walter L. The Human Figure by Albrecht Dürer: The Complete “Dresden Sketchbook.” New York: Dover Publications, 1972.Google Scholar

Stubbe, Wolf. “Unbekannte Zeichnungen altdeutscher Meister.” In Stubbe, Wolf et al., eds., Museum und Kunst: Beiträge für Alfred Hentzen. Hamburg: Christians, 1970.Google Scholar

Taape, Tillmann. “Common Medicine for the Common Man: Picturing the ‘Striped Layman’ in Early Vernacular Print.” Renaissance Quarterly 74 (2021): 1–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Talbot, Charles. “Topography as Landscape in Early Printed Books.” In Hindman, Sandra, The Early Illustrated Book Essays in Honor of Lessing Julius Rosenwald. Washington, DC: Library of Congress, 1982.Google Scholar

Telle, Joachim, ed. Pharmazie und der gemeine Mann: Hausarznei und Apotheke in der frühen Neuzeit: erläutert anhand deutscher Fachschriften der Herzog-August-Bibliothek Wolfenbüttel und pharmazeutischer Geräte des Deutschen Apotheken-Museums Heidelberg. Weinheim: VCH, Acta Humaniora, 1988.Google Scholar

Tessicini, Dario. “Definitions of ‘Cosmography’ and ‘Geography’ in the Wake of 15th and 16th Century Translations and Editions of Ptolemy’s Geography.” In Shalev, Zur and Burnett, Charles, eds., Ptolemy’s Geography in the Renaissance. Warburg Institute Colloquia. London: Warburg Institute, 2011.Google Scholar

Thorndike, Lynn. A History of Magic and Experimental Science. New York: Columbia University Press, 1941.Google Scholar

Thorndike, Lynn. “The Problem of the Composite Manuscript.” In Giovanni Mercati: Miscellanea Giovanni Mercati. Vatican City: Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, 1946.Google Scholar

Thorndike, Lynn and Bosco, Joannes de Sacro, eds. The Sphere of Sacrobosco and Its Commentators. Corpus of Mediaeval Scientific Texts: Volume 2. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1949.Google Scholar

Turner, Anthony John. Early Scientific Instruments: Europe 1400–1800. London: Sotheby’s Publications, 1987.Google Scholar

Valleriani, Matteo, ed. De Sphaera of Johannes de Sacrobosco in the Early Modern Period: The Authors of the Commentaries. Cham: Springer, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Valleriani, Matteo, The Structures of Practical Knowledge. Cham: Springer, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

van Buren, Anne H. and Edmunds, Sheila. “Playing Cards and Manuscripts: Some Widely Disseminated Fifteenth-Century Model Sheets.” Art Bulletin 56, no. 1 (1974): 12–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

vanden Broecke, Steven. The Limits of Influence: Pico, Louvain and the Crisis of Renaissance Astrology. Leiden and Boston, MA: Brill, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

vanden Broecke, Steven. “The Use of Visual Media in Renaissance Cosmography: The Cosmography of Peter Apian and Gemma Frisius.” Paedagogica Historica 36, no. 1 (2000): 130–50.Google Scholar

Van der Stock, Jan. In Search of Utopia: Art and Science in the Era of Thomas More. Leuven: Davidsfonds Uitgeverij, 2016.Google Scholar

Van Duzer, Chet. “Johann Schöner’s Globe of 1515: Transcription and Study.” Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 100, no. 5 (2010): 1–217.Google Scholar

van Gastel, Joris, Hadjinicolaou, Tannis, and Rath, Markus, eds. Paragone als Mitstreit. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2014.Google Scholar

Van Leerdam, Andrea. “Talking Heads. The Visual Rhetoric of Recurring Scholar Woodcuts in a Sixteenth-Century Handbook on Chiromancy.” Jaarboek voor Nederlandse Boekgeschiedenis 26 (2019): 11–29.Google Scholar

van Ortroy, Fernand. Bibliographie de l’oeuvre de Pierre Apian. Amsterdam: Meridian, 1963.Google Scholar

Van Putten, Jasper. Networked Nation: Mapping German Cities in Sebastian Münster’s “Cosmographia.” Leiden: Brill, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Veltman, Kim H. “Ptolemy and the Origins of Linear Perspective.” In Atti del Convegno Internazionale di Studi Tenutosi al Castello Sforzesco, Civiche Raccolte d’Arte di Milano, dall’11 al 15 Ottobre del 1977. Florence: Centro Di, 1980.Google Scholar

Vogtherr, Heinrich. “Heinrich Vogtherr: Ein frembds und wunderbars Kunstbüchlin allen Molern/ Bildschnitzern/ Goldschmiden/ Steinmetzen/ Schreinern/ Platnern/ Waffen und Messerschmiden hochnutzlich zu gebrauchen (Straßburg 1538/1572) herausgegeben und kommentiert von Maria Heilmann.” Ed. Maria Heilmann, FONTES 61 (2011).Google Scholar

Voigt, Lisa and Brancaforte, Elio. “The Traveling Illustrations of Sixteenth-Century Travel Narratives.” PMLA 129, no. 3 (2014): 365–98.Google Scholar

Vorholt, Hanna. Shaping Knowledge: The Transmission of the Liber Floridus. London: Warburg Institute, 2017.Google Scholar

Wade, Mara. “The Emblems of the Altdorf Academy: Emblematic Pedagogy and Nuremberg Civic Culture.” Histories of Universities XXXIV, no. 2 (2021): 137–70.Google Scholar

Walsby, Malcolm and Kemp, Graeme. The Book Triumphant: Print in Transition in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries. Leiden and Boston, MA: Brill, 2011.Google Scholar

West, Ashley. “Conrad Peutinger and the Visual Arts: Collaborating with Hans Burgkmair the Elder.” In Laube, Reinhard and Zäh, Helmut, eds., Gesammeltes Gedächtnis: Konrad Peutinger und die kulturelle Überlieferung im 16. Jahrhundert. Lucerne: Quaternio Verlag, 2016.Google Scholar

Westman, Robert S. “The Astronomer’s Role in the Sixteenth Century: A Preliminary Study.” History of Science 18 (1980): 105–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wetter, Evelin, Scholten, Frits, and Smith, Jeffrey Chipps. Prayer-Nuts, Private Devotion and Early Modern Art Collecting. Riggisberg: Abegg-Stiftung, 2017.Google Scholar

Williams, Steven J. “Roger Bacon and the Secret of Secrets.” In Hackett, Jeremiah, ed., Roger Bacon and the Sciences. Leiden: Brill, 1997.Google Scholar

Williams, Steven J. The Secret of Secrets: The Scholarly Career of a Pseudo-Aristotelian Text in the Late Middle Ages. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilson, Bronwen. “Learning How to Read: Giovanni Battista Della Porta, Physiognomy, and Printed Portrait-Books.” Paper delivered at Visual Knowledges Conference, University of Edinburgh, 17–20 September 2003.Google Scholar

Wilson, Bronwen. “Reflecting on the Turk in Late Sixteenth-Century Venetian Portrait Books.” Word & Image 19, no. 1 (2003): 38–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilson, Bronwen. The World in Venice: Print, the City and Early Modern Identity. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Winkler, Friedrich. Die Zeichnungen Albrecht Dürers. Berlin: Deutscher Verein für Kunstwissenschaft, 1938.Google Scholar

Wood, Christopher S. Forgery, Replica, Fiction: Temporalities of German Renaissance Art. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Woodward, David, ed. The History of Cartography. Volume 3: Cartography in the European Renaissance. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Yanni, Carla. Nature’s Museums. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Architectural Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Zagorin, Perez. Ways of Lying. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Zelen, Joyce. Blinded by Curiosity: The Collector-Dealer Hadriaan Beverland (1650–1716). Leiden: Primavera Pers, 2022.Google Scholar

Ziegeler, Joseph, “Philosophers and Physicians on the Scientific Validity of Latin Physiognomy, 1200–1500.” Early Science and Medicine 12, no. 3 (2007): 285–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zinner, Ernst. Deutsche und niederländische astronomische Instrumente des 11.–18. Jahrhunderts. 2nd ed. Munich: Beck, 1967.Google Scholar

Zinner, Ernst. Regiomontanus: His Life and Work. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1990.Google Scholar