Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T20:49:48.998Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Conclusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2015

Evelyn S. Rawski
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Get access

Summary

What would Chinese history look like if it were written from the perspective of the periphery and not the core? De-centering China entails focusing on interaction between the borderlands and the Central Plain as the dynamic engine behind the long-term development of China's imperial formation, and considering the long periods when China was divided or ruled by non-Han peoples, generally from its northern or northeastern frontiers, rather than concentrating attention on periods of unified rule. De-centering China also requires us to study texts produced by borderland peoples, and to contemplate events in which the Chinese heartland was encompassed in historical movements of regional or global dimensions.

Why de-center China? Orthodox historians neglect the story of how peoples from the borderlands interacted, formed states, and challenged Central Plain regimes. To justify this oversight, they rely on the traditional generalization that the horse-riding nomads had to dismount in order to rule, i.e. that they had to learn Chinese ways in order to govern the Central Plain. Despite scholarship that shows northeast regimes rather quickly developed bureaucratic modes of governance and political rhetoric through long contact with Chinese states, the notion that frontiersmen might conquer China, but would then find themselves enveloped by Chinese culture, persists. The traditional framework of dynastic cycles, along with officially commissioned dynastic histories that perpetuate this idealized and distorted vision of a unified China that exaggerates continuity, downplays the distinctiveness of each ruling house, and thus its special historical contribution.

The gap between image and reality is especially significant with regard to the many centuries when non-Han rulers – including the Tang, Yuan, and Qing – governed the Chinese heartland. For example, although the Tang era has been described as a “golden age” of Chinese history, its frontier origins played virtually no role in analyses of its historical contributions outside the military sphere.

Type
Chapter
Information
Early Modern China and Northeast Asia
Cross-Border Perspectives
, pp. 225 - 234
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Conclusion
  • Evelyn S. Rawski, University of Pittsburgh
  • Book: Early Modern China and Northeast Asia
  • Online publication: 05 June 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316144572.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Conclusion
  • Evelyn S. Rawski, University of Pittsburgh
  • Book: Early Modern China and Northeast Asia
  • Online publication: 05 June 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316144572.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Conclusion
  • Evelyn S. Rawski, University of Pittsburgh
  • Book: Early Modern China and Northeast Asia
  • Online publication: 05 June 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316144572.009
Available formats
×