Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T22:08:22.750Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - The body in action

the impact of self-produced action on infants’ action perception and understanding

from Part III - Bodily correspondences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2011

Virginia Slaughter
Affiliation:
University of Queensland
Celia A. Brownell
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Get access

Summary

Perceiving, representing, and reasoning about the human body is an incredibly difficult task; the fact that we traffic in this ability with such ease is no mean feat. After all, bodies are more than complex objects. They are more than a collection of parts that co-articulate, more than things that can be acted on, more than entities that are in the world and of the world. Rather, bodies act on the world. Bodies, by definition, are bodies in action: limbs move, joints articulate, digits bend and curl. Critically, many of these actions convey meaning: they are about the world. And it is precisely this meaningfulness of the human body in relation to the world that makes the task of perceiving, representing and reasoning about the human body both so complex and so critical.

Among other things, understanding the human body is central to our everyday social reasoning and social interactions: we perceive the body to read the mind. Goals and intentions, in particular, while generated by the mind, are instantiated in bodily acts. An event in which an arm moves at a 45-degree trajectory, and a rate of 15 centimeters a second, culminating in contact with a wine glass, is more than the collection of its surface features. It signifies an actor’s goal (obtaining the wine glass), reveals the actor’s underlying intention (getting a drink of wine), and can be a window into the actor’s proclivities and dispositions (liking wine).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baldwin, D. A.Baird, J. A.Saylor, M. M.Clark, M. A. 2001 Infants parse dynamic actionChild Development 72 708CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brand, R. J.Shallcross, W. L.Sabatos, M. G.Massie, K. P. 2007 Fine-grained analysis of motionese: Eye gaze, object exchanges, and action units in infant-versus adult-directed actionInfancy 11 203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clifton, R. K.Rochat, P.Litovsky, R. Y.Perris, E. E. 1991 Object representation guides infants’ reaching in the darkJournal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 17 323Google Scholar
Csibra, G.Gergely, G. 2009 Natural pedagogyTrends in Cognitive Sciences 13 148CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flack-Ytter, T.Gredebäck, G.von Hofsten, C. 2006 Infants predict other people’s action goalsNature Neuroscience 9 878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frye, D. 1991 The origins of intention in infancyFrye, D.Moore, C.Children’s Theories of Mind: Mental States and Social UnderstandingHillsdale, NJLawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
Gallese, V. 2009 Motor abstraction: A neuroscientific account of how action goals and intentions are mapped and understoodPsychological Research 73 486CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, E. J.Pick, A. D. 2000 An Ecological Approach to Perceptual Learning and DevelopmentOxfordOxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Hauf, P.Elsner, B.Aschersleben, G. 2004 The role of action effects in infants’ action controlPsychological Research 68 115CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Longo, M. R.Bertenthal, B. I. 2007 Common coding of observation and execution of action in 9-month-old infantsInfancy 10 43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meltzoff, A. N. 2005 Imitation and other minds: The “like me” hypothesisHurley, S.Chater, N.Perspectives on Imitation: From Neuroscience to Social Science, Vol. II: Imitation, Human Development, and CultureCambridge, MAMIT PressGoogle Scholar
Meltzoff, A. N.Moore, M. K. 1995 Infants’ understanding of people and things: From body imitation to folk psychologyBermúdez, J.Eilan, N.The Body and the SelfCambridge, MAMIT PressGoogle Scholar
Moll, H.Carpenter, M.Tomasello, M. 2007 Fourteen-month-olds know what others experience only in joint engagementDevelopmental Science 10 826CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nystrom, P. 2008 The infant mirror neuron system studied with high density EEGSocial Neuroscience 3 334CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piaget, J. 1953 The Origins of Intelligence in the ChildLondonRoutledge and Kegan PaulGoogle Scholar
Rizzolatti, G.Sinigaglia, C. 2010 The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: Interpretations and misinterpretationsNature Reviews Neuroscience 11 264CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robin, D. J.Berthier, N. E.Clifton, R. K. 1996 Infants’ predictive reaching for moving objects in the darkDevelopmental Psychology 32 824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommerville, J. A.Crane, C. C. 2009 Ten-month-old infants use prior information to identify an actor’s goalDevelopmental Science 12 314CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sommerville, J. A.Decety, J. 2006 Weaving the fabric of social interaction: Articulating developmental psychology and cognitive neuroscience in the domain of motor cognitionPsychonomic Bulletin and Review 13 179CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sommerville, J. A.Hammond, A. J. 2007 Treating another’s actions as one’s own: Children’s memory of and learning from joint activityDevelopmental Psychology 43 1,003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sommerville, J. A.Woodward, A. L. 2005 Pulling out the intentional structure of action: The relation between action processing and action production in infancyCognition 95 1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sommerville, J. A.Crane, C. C.Yun, J. E.
Sommerville, J. A.Hildebrand, E. A.Crane, C. C. 2008 Experience matters: The impact of doing versus watching on infants’ subsequent perception of tool use eventsDevelopmental Psychology 44 1,249CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sommerville, J. A.Feldman, E.Dillon, A.
Sommerville, J. A.Woodward, A. L.Needham, A. N. 2005 Action experience alters 3-month-old infants’ perception of other’s actionsCognition 96 B1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. 1999 Having intentions, understanding intentions and understanding communicative intentionsZelazo, P. D.Astington, J. W.Olson, D. R.Developing Theories of Intention: Social Understanding and Self-controlMahwah, NJLawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
von Hofsten, C.Ronnqvist, L. 1988 Preparation for grasping an object: A developmental studyJournal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 14 610Google ScholarPubMed
Want, S. C.Harris, P. L. 2001 Learning from other people’s mistakes: Causal understanding in learning to use a toolChild Development 72 431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, M.Knoblich, G. 2005 The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecificsPsychological Bulletin 131 460CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woodward, A. L. 1998 Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor’s reachCognition 69 1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woodward, A. L. 2003 Infants’ developing understanding of the link between looker and objectDevelopmental Science 6 297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, A. L.Guajardo, J. J. 2002 Infants’ understanding of the point gesture as an object-directed actionCognitive Development 17 1,061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, A. L.Sommerville, J. A. 2000 Twelve-month-old infants interpret action in contextPsychological Science 11 73CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yonas, A.Hartman, B. 1993 Perceiving the affordance of contact in four- and five-month-old infantsChild Development 64 298Google ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×