Abramowitz, M. and Stegun, I. A.. Handbook of Mathematical Functions. Dover, 9th edition, New York, 1972.Google Scholar

Abzug, M. J. and Larrabee, E. E.. Airplane Stability and Control, A History of the Technologies That Made Aviation Possible. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2nd edition, 2002.Google Scholar

Afonso, F., Vale, J., Oliveira, E., Lau, F., and Suleman, A.. A review on non-linear aeroelasticity of high aspect-ratio wings. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 89(3):40–57, February 2017. doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2016.12.004.Google Scholar

Ahmad, N. and Proctor, F.. Mesoscale simulation data for initializing fast-time wake transport and decay models. In 51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Grapevine, Texas, USA, January 2013. doi:10.2514/6.2013-510.Google Scholar

Albano, E. and Rodden, W. P.. A doublet-lattice method for calculating lift distributions on oscillating surfaces in subsonic flow. AIAA Journal, 7(2):279–285, 1969. doi:10.2514/3.5086.Google Scholar

Anderson, B. D. O. and Moore, J. B.. Optimal Filtering. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA, 1979.Google Scholar

Anderson, B. D. O. and Moore, J. B.. Optimal Control. Dover Publications, Mineola, New York, USA, 1990.Google Scholar

Anon. Aeroelastic effects from a flight mechanics standpoint. In 34th Meeting of the AGARD Flight Mechanics Panel, Marseille, France, 21–25 April 1969. NATO Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development.Google Scholar

Antoulas, A.C. Approximation of Large-Scale Dynamical Systems. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2005. doi:10.1137/1.9780898718713.Google Scholar

Argentina, M., Skotheim, J., and Mahadevan, L.. Settling and swimming of flexible fluid-lubricated foils. Physical Review Letters, 99(22):224503–4, 2007. doi:10.1103/Phys-RevLett.99.224503.Google Scholar

Argyris, J. An excursion into large rotations. Computers Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 32:85–155, 1982. doi:10.1016/0045-7825(82)90069-X.Google Scholar

Artola, M., Goizueta, N., Wynn, A., and Palacios, R.. Aeroelastic control and estimation with a minimal nonlinear modal description. AIAA Journal, 59(7):2697–2713, 2021a. doi:10.2514/1.J060018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Artola, M., Goizueta, N., Wynn, A., and Palacios, R.. Proof of concept for a hardware-in-the-loop nonlinear control framework for very flexible aircraft. In AIAA Science and Technology Forum and Exposition, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, 4–8 January 2021b. doi:10.2514/6.2021-1392.Google Scholar

Artola, M., Wynn, A., and Palacios, R.. A generalised Kelvin-Voigt damping model for geometrically-nonlinear beams. AIAA Journal, 59(1):356–365, 2021c. doi:10.2514/1.J059767.Google Scholar

Artola, M., Wynn, A, and Palacios, R.. Modal-based nonlinear model predictive control for 3D very flexible structures. IEEE Transactions in Automatic Control, 2022. doi:10.1109/TAC.2021.3071326.Google Scholar

Ashley, H. H. Engineering Analysis of Flight Vehicles. Addison-Wesley Aerospace Series. Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, Massachusetts, USA, 1974.Google Scholar

Avin, O., Raveh, D. E., Drachinsky, A., Ben-Shmuel, Y., and Tur, M.. Experimental aeroe-lastic benchmark of a very flexible wing. AIAA Journal, 60(3):1745–1768, 2022. doi:10.2514/1.J060621.Google Scholar

Bairstow, L. and Fage, A.. Oscillations of the tail plane and body of an aeroplane in flight. Reports and Memoranda 276, Part II, British Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1916.Google Scholar

Bairstow, L., Jones, B. M, and Thomson, A. W. H.. Investigation into the stability of an aeroplane, with an examination into the conditions necessary in order that the symmetric and antisymmetric oscillations can be considered independently. Reports and Memoranda 7, British Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1913.Google Scholar

Baker, M. L., Mingori, D. L., and Goggin, P. J.. Approximate subspace iteration for constructing internally balanced reduced order models of unsteady aerodynamic systems. In 37th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, 15–17 April 1996. doi:10.2514/6.1996-1441.Google Scholar

Balachandran, B. and Magrab, E. B.. Vibrations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 3rd edition, 2018.Google Scholar

Baldelli, D. H., Chen, P. C., and Panza, J.. Unified aeroelastic and flight dynamic formulation via rational function approximations. Journal of Aircraft, 43(3):763–772, 2006. doi:10.2514/1.16620.Google Scholar

Ballhaus, W. F. and Goorjian, P. M.. Computation of unsteady transonic flows by the indicial method. AIAA Journal, 16(2):117–124, 1978. doi:10.2514/3.60868.Google Scholar

Bartley-Cho, J. D. and Henderson, A.. Design and analysis of HiLDA/AEI aeroelastic wind tunnel model. In AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, 18–21 August 2008. doi:10.2514/6.2008-7191.Google Scholar

Barzgaran, B., Quenzer, J. D., Mesbahi, M., Morgansen, K. A., and Livne, E.. Real-time model predictive control for gust load alleviation on an aeroelastic wind tunnel test article. In AIAA Science and Technology Forum and Exposition, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, 4–8 January 2021. doi:10.2514/6.2021-0500.Google Scholar

Batchelor, G. K. The Theory of Homogeneous Turbulence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1953.Google Scholar

Bauchau, O. A., Epple, A., and Heo, S.. Interpolation of finite rotations in flexible multi-body dynamics simulations. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part K: Journal of Multi-body Dynamics, 222(4):353–366, 2008. doi:10.1243/14644193JMBD155.Google Scholar

Bauchau, O. A. Flexible Multibody Dynamics, volume 176 of Solid Mechanics and Its Applications. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2011. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-0335-3.Google Scholar

Bazilevs, Y., Takizawa, K, and Tezduyar, T. E.. Computational Fluid-Structure Interaction: Methods and Applications. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 2013.Google Scholar

Beal, T. R. Digital simulation of atmospheric turbulence for Dryden and von Kármán models. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 16(1):132–138, 1993. doi:10.2514/3.11437.Google Scholar

Beck, M. S. Correlation in instruments: cross correlation flowmeters. Journal of Physics E: Scientific Instruments, 14(1):7–19, 1981. doi:10.1088/0022-3735/14/1/001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bell, T. M., Klein, P. M., K. Lundquist, J., and Waugh, S.. Remote sensing and radiosonde datasets collected in the San Luis Valley during the LAPSE-RATE campaign. Earth System Science Data, 13(3):1041–1051, March 2021. doi:10.5194/ essd-13-1041-2021.Google Scholar

Bendiksen, O. O. Transonic limit cycle flutter of high-aspect-ratio swept wings. In 47th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Newport, Rhode Island, USA, 1–4 May 2006. doi:10.2514/1.29547.Google Scholar

Benner, P., Kürschner, P., and Saak, J.. Frequency-limited balanced truncation with low-rank approximations. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 38(1):A471–A499, 2016. doi:10.1137/15M1030911.Google Scholar

Beran, P. S., Khot, N. S., E. Eastep, F., Snyder, R. D., and Zweber, J. V.. Numerical analysis of store-induced limit-cycle oscillation. Journal of Aircraft, 41(6):1315–1326, 2004.Google Scholar

Beranek, J., L. Nicolai, M. Buonanno, E. Burnett, C. Atkinson, B. Holm-Hansen, and Flick, P. M.. Conceptual design of a multi-utility aeroelastic demonstrator. In 13th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis Optimization Conference, Fort Worth, Texas, USA, 13–15 September 2010. doi:10.2514/6.2010-9350.Google Scholar

Bhardwaj, M. K., Kapania, R. K., Y. Reichenbach, E., and Guruswamy, G. P.. Computational fluid dynamics/computational structural dynamics interaction methodology for aircraft wings. AIAA Journal, 36(12):2179–2186, 1998.Google Scholar

Bieniek, D. and Luckner, R.. Simulation of aircraft encounters with perturbed vortices considering unsteady aerodynamic effects. Journal of Aircraft, 51(3):705–718, 2014. doi:10.2514/1.C032383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Birnbaum, W. Die tragende Wirbelfläche als Hilfsmittel zur Behandlung des ebenen Problems der Tragflügeltheorie. ZAMM, 3(4):290–297, 1923.Google Scholar

Birnbaum, W. Das ebene Problem des schlagenden Flügels (The Plane Problem of the Flapping Wing–also NACA TM 1364, 1954). ZAMM, 4:277–298, 1924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bisplinghoff, R. L., Ashley, H., and Halfman, R. L.. Aeroelasticity. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, USA, 1955.Google Scholar

Blair, M. A compilation of the mathematics leading to the doublet-lattice method. Report 9227812, Air Force Research Laboratories, Dayton, Ohio, USA, March 1992.Google Scholar

Blaylock, M., Chow, R., Cooperman, A., and van Dam, C. P.. Comparison of pneumatic jets and tabs for active aerodynamic load control. Wind Energy, 17(9):1365–1384, 2014. doi:10.1002/we.1638.Google Scholar

Block, J. J. and Strganac, T. W.. Applied active control for a nonlinear aeroelastic structure. Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 21(6), 1998.Google Scholar

Bock, H. G. and Krämer-Eis, P.. A multiple shooting method for numerical computation of open and closed loop controls in nonlinear systems. IFAC Proceedings, 17(2):411–415, July 1984. doi:10.1016/S1474-6670(17)61005-X.Google Scholar

Böswald, M., Govers, Y., Vollan, A., and Basien, M.. Solar Impulse – How to validate the numerical model of a superlight aircraft with A340 dimensions! In Proceedings of ISMA 2010–International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, 2010, pp. 2451–2466.Google Scholar

Boyd, S. and Vandenberghe, L. Convex Optimization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2004.Google Scholar

Brandt, S. A., Bertin, J. J., Stiles, R. J., and Whitford, R. Introduction to Aeronautics. AIAA Educational Series, Reston, Virginia, USA, 2nd edition, 2006. doi:10.2514/4.862007.Google Scholar

Breitsamter, C. Wake vortex characteristics of transport aircraft. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 47(2):89–134, 2011. doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2010.09.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Britt, R. T., Jacobson, S. B., and Arthurs, T. D.. Aeroservoelastic analysis of the B-2 bomber. Journal of Aircraft, 37(5):745–752, 2000. doi:10.2514/2.2674.Google Scholar

Brown, S. A. Displacement extrapolations for CFD + CSM aeroelastic analysis. In 38th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Kissimmee, Florida, USA, 07–10 April 1997.Google Scholar

Broyden, C. G. A class of methods for solving nonlinear simultaneous equations. Mathematics of Computation, 19(92):577–593, 1965.Google Scholar

Brunton, S. L. and Kutz, J. N.. Data-Driven Science and Engineering. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2019. doi:10.1017/9781108380690.Google Scholar

Brunton, S. L. and Rowley, C. W.. Empirical state-space representations for Theodorsen’s lift model. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 38:174–186, 2013.Google Scholar

Bryan, G. H. Stability in Aviation. MacMillian, London, UK, 1911.Google Scholar

Bryan, G. H. and Williams, W. E.. The longitudinal stability of aerial gliders. In Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A, volume 73, London, UK, 1904.Google Scholar

Bryant, L. W. and Pugsley, A. G.. The lateral stability of highly loaded aeroplanes. Reports and Memoranda 1840, British Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1936.Google Scholar

Bryson, A. E. and Ho, Y. C.. Applied Optimal Control: Optimization, Estimation, and Control. Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, London, UK, 1979.Google Scholar

Buck, B. K. and Newman, B. A.. Aircraft acceleration prediction due to atmospheric disturbances with flight data validation. Journal of Aircraft, 43(1):72–81, 2006. doi:10.2514/1.12074.Google Scholar

Burl, J. B. Linear Optimal Control – H2 and Methods. Addison-Wesley, Menlo Park, California, USA, 1999.Google Scholar

Burnett, E. L., Beranek, J. A., T. Holm-Hansen, B., Atkinson, C. J., and Flick, P. M.. Design and flight test of active flutter suppression on the X-56A multi-utility technology test-bed aircraft. The Aeronautical Journal, 120(1228):893–909, 2016. doi:10.1017/aer.2016.41.Google Scholar

Burnham, D. C. and Hallock, J. N.. Chicago monostatic acoustic vortex sensing system. Technical report, National Information Service, Springfield, Virginia, USA, 1982.Google Scholar

Burris, P. M. and Bender, M. A.. Aircraft load alleviation and mode stabilization (LAMS) -B-52 systems analysis, synthesis, and design. Technical report AFFDL-TR-68-161, Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, USA, November 1969.Google Scholar

Campbell, C. W. Monte Carlo turbulence simulation using rational approximations to von Kármán spectra. AIAA Journal, 24(1):62–66, 1986. doi:10.2514/3.9223.Google Scholar

Castrichini, A., T. Wilson, F. Saltari, F. Mastroddi, N. Viceconti, and Cooper, J. E.. Aeroelastics flight dynamics coupling effects of the semi-aeroelastic hinge device. Journal of Aircraft, 57(2):1–9, 2020. doi:10.2514/1.C035602.Google Scholar

Cea, A. and Palacios, R.. A non-intrusive geometrically nonlinear augmentation to generic linear aeroelastic models. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 101:103222, 2021. doi:10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2021.103222.Google Scholar

Cea, A. and Palacios, R.. Assessment of geometrically nonlinear effects on the aeroelastic response of a transport aircraft configuration. Journal of Aircraft, 60(1):205–220, January 2023. doi:10.2514/1.C036740.Google Scholar

Cesnik, C. E. S., Aeroelasticity of very flexible aircraft: Prof. Dewey Hodges’ three-decade contributions to the field. In Proc. AIAA Science and Technology Forum and Exposition (SciTech2023), National Harbor, Maryland, USA, 23–27 January 2023.Google Scholar

Cesnik, C. E. S. and Brown, E. L.. Modeling of high aspect ratio active flexible wings for roll control. In 43rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Denver, Colorado, USA, 22–25 April 2002. doi:10.2514/6.2002-1719.Google Scholar

Cesnik, C. E. S. and Brown, E. L.. Active warping control of a joined-wing airplane configuration. In 44th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Norfolk, Virginia, USA, 7–10 April 2003. doi:10.2514/6.2003-1715.Google Scholar

Cesnik, C. E. S. and Su., W. Nonlinear aeroelastic modeling and analysis of fully flexible aircraft. In 46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Austin, Texas, 18–21 April 2005. doi:10.2514/6.2005-2169.Google Scholar

Cesnik, C. E. S. and Hodges, D. H.. VABS: A new concept for composite rotor blade cross-sectional modeling. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 42(1):27–38, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cesnik, C. E. S., Hodges, D. H., and Sutyrin, V. G.. Cross-sectional analysis of composite beams including large initial twist and curvature effects. AIAA Journal, 34(9):1913–1920, 1996.Google Scholar

Cesnik, C. E. S., Senatore, P. J., Su, W., Atkins, E. M., and Shearer, C. M.. X-HALE: A very flexible unmanned aerial vehicle for nonlinear aeroelastic tests. AIAA Journal, 50(12):2820–2833, 2012. doi:10.2514/1.J051392.Google Scholar

Cesnik, C. E. S., Palacios, R, and Reichenbach, E. Y.. Re-examined structural design procedures for very flexible aircraft. Journal of Aircraft, 51(5):1580–1591, 2014. doi:10.2514/1.C032464.Google Scholar

Chevalier, H. L., Dornfeld, G. M., and Schwanz, R. C.. An analytical method for predicting the stability and control characteristics of large elastic airplanes at subsonic and supersonic speeds, Part II - Application. In 34th Meeting of the AGARD Flight Mechanics Panel, Marseille, France, 21–25 April 1969. NATO Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development.Google Scholar

Christhilf, D. M., Moulin, B., Ritz, E., C. Chen, P., Roughen, K. M., and Perry III, B.. Characteristics of control laws tested on the semi-span supersonic transport (S4T) windtunnel model. In 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Waikiki, Hawaii, 23–26 April 2012. doi:10.2514/6.2012-1555.Google Scholar

Cicala, P. Aerodynamic forces on an oscillating proile in uniform stream. Memorie della Reale Accademia delle Scienze, II-68:73–98, 1935.Google Scholar

Claverias, S., Cerezo, J., Torralba, M. A., Reyes, M., Climent, H., and Karpel, M.. Wake vortex encounter loads numerical simulation. In International Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics, Bristol, UK, June 2013.Google Scholar

Collar, A. R. The expanding domain of aeroelasticity, The Journal ofthe Royal Aeronautical Society, 50(428):613–636, August 1946. doi:10.1017/S0368393100120358.Google Scholar

Collar, A. R. The Second Lanchester Memorial Lecture: Aeroelasticity, retrospect and prospect. The Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, 63(577):1–15, 1959. doi:10.1017/ S0368393100070450.Google Scholar

Collar, A. R. The irst ifty years of aeroelasticity. Aerospace, 5(2):12–20, 1978.Google Scholar

Connolly, J. W., Kopasakis, G., Chwalowski, P., Carlson, J.R., Sanetrik, M. D., Silva, W. A., and McNamara, J.. Aero-propulso-elastic analysis of a supersonic transport. Journal of Aircraft, 57(4):569–585, July 2020. ISSN 1533-3868. doi:10.2514/1.C035531.Google Scholar

Cook, M. V. Flight Dynamics Principles: A Linear Systems Approach to Aircraft Stability and Control. Butterworth-Heinemann, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA, 3rd edition, 2013.Google Scholar

Cook, R. G., Palacios, R., and Goulart, P. J.. Robust gust alleviation and stabilization of very flexible aircraft. AIAA Journal, 51(2):330–340, 2013. doi:10.2514/1.j051697.Google Scholar

Cook, W. H. The Road to the 707. TYC Publishing Co., Bellevue, Washington, USA, 1991.Google Scholar

Cornman, L. B., Morse, C. S., and Cunning, G.. Real-time estimation of atmospheric turbulence severity from in-situ aircraft measurements. Journal of Aircraft, 31(1):171–177, 1995. doi:10.2514/3.46697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cottet, G.-H. and Koumoutsakos, P. D.. Vortex Methods: Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2000.Google Scholar

Cox, H. R. and Pugsley, A. G.. Theory of loss of lateral control due to wing twisting. Reports and Memoranda 1506, British Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1932.Google Scholar

Crisfield, M. A. and Jelenic, G.. Objectivity of strain measures in the geometrically exact three-dimensional beam theory and its finite-element implementation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 455(1983): 1125–1147, 1999. doi:10.1098/rspa.1999.0352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ronch, Da, McCracken, A., A. J., Badcock, K. J., Widhalm, M., and Campobasso, M. S.. Linear frequency domain and harmonic balance predictions of dynamic derivatives. Journal of Aircraft, 50(3):694–707, 2013. doi:10.2514/1.C031674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dawson, S. T. M. and Brunton, S. L.. Improved approximations to Wagner function using sparse identification of nonlinear dynamics. AIAA Journal, 60(3):1–17, 2021. doi:10.2514/1.j060863.Google Scholar

De Marco, A., Duke, E, and Berndt, J.. A general solution to the aircraft trim problem. In AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference and Exhibit, Hilton Head, South Carolina, USA, 20–23 August 2007. doi:10.2514/6.2007-6703.Google Scholar

del Carre, A. and Palacios, R.. Low-altitude dynamics of very flexible aircraft. In AIAA Science and Technology Forum and Exposition, San Diego, California, USA, 7–11 January 2019. AIAA Paper No. 2019–2038.Google Scholar

del Carre, A. and Palacios, R.. Simulation and optimization of takeoff maneuvers of very flexible aircraft. Journal of Aircraft, 57(6):1097–1110, November 2020. doi:10.2514/1.C035901.Google Scholar

del Carre, A., Muñoz-Simón, A., Goizueta, N, and Palacios, R.. SHARPy: A dynamic aeroelastic simulation toolbox for very flexible aircraft and wind turbines. Journal of Open Source Software, 4(44):1885, December 2019a. doi:10.21105/joss.01885.Google Scholar

del Carre, A., Teixeira, P., Palacios, R., and Cesnik, C. E. S.. Nonlinear response of a very flexible aircraft under lateral gust. In International Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics, Savannah, Georgia, USA, 10–13 June 2019b. IFASD Paper 2019-090.Google Scholar

Derkevorkian, A., Masri, S. F., Alvarenga, J., Boussalis, H., Bakalyar, J., and Richards, W. L.. Strain-based deformation shape-estimation algorithm for control and monitoring applications. AIAA Journal, 51(9):2231–2240, 2013. doi:10.2514/1.J052215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deskos, G., del Carre, A., and Palacios, R.. Assessment of low-altitude atmospheric turbulence models for aircraft aeroelasticity. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 95:102981, May 2020. doi:10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2020.102981.Google Scholar

Diehl, M., Magni, L, and De Nicolao, G.. Efficient NMPC of unstable periodic systems using approximate infinite horizon closed loop costing. Annual Reviews in Control, 28(1):37–45, January 2004. doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2004.01.011.Google Scholar

Dillsaver, M. J., E. S. Cesnik, C., and Kolmanovsky, I. V.. Gust load alleviation control for very flexible aircraft. In AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, Portland, Oregon, USA, August 2011. doi: 10.2514/6.2011-6368.Google Scholar

Dillsaver, M. J., E. S. Cesnik, C., and Kolmanovsky, I. V.. Gust response sensitivity characteristics of very flexible aircraft. In AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 08–11 August 2012. doi:10.2514/6.2012-4576.Google Scholar

Disney, T. E. The C-5A active load alleviation system. In AIAA Aircraft Systems and Technology Meeting, Los Angeles, California, USA, 4–7 August 1975. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. AIAA Paper 75-991.Google Scholar

Dizy, J., Palacios, R, and Pinho, S. T.. Homogenisation of slender periodic composite structures. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 50:1473–1481, May 2013. doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.01.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dowell, E. H., Dusto, A. R., and Hall, K. C.. Eigenmode analysis in unsteady aerodynamics: Reduced order models. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 50(6):371–387, 1997. doi:10.1115/1.3101718.Google Scholar

Dowell, E. H. and Tang, D. Dynamics of Very High Dimensional Systems. World Scientific Publishing Company, Singapore, 2003.Google Scholar

Dowell, E. H., Clark, R., Cox, D., Curtis Jr., H. C., Edwards, J. W., Hall, K. H., Peters, D. A., Scanlan, R., Simiu, E., Sisto, F, and Strganac, T. W.. A Modern Course in Aeroelasticity. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 4th edition, 2004.Google Scholar

Doyle, J. Guaranteed margins for LQG regulators. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control,23 (4):756–757, 1978. doi:10.1109/TAC.1978.1101812.Google Scholar

Drela, M. Integrated simulation model for preliminary aerodynamic, structural, and control-law design of aircraft. In 40th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Louis, St, Missouri, USA, 12–15 April 1999. doi:10.2514/6.1999-1394.Google Scholar

Drela, M. Flight Vehicle Aerodynamics. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, 2014.Google Scholar

Drewiacki, D., Silvestre, F. J., and Guimarães Neto, A. B.. Influence of airframe flexibility on pilot-induced oscillations. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 42(7):1537–1550, 2019. doi:10.2514/1.G004024.Google Scholar

Duessler, S., Goizueta, N., Muñoz-Simón, A., and Palacios, R.. Modelling and numerical enhancements on a UVLM for nonlinear aeroelastic simulation. In AIAA Science and Technology Forum and Exposition, San Diego, California, USA, 3–7 January 2022. doi:10.2514/6.2021-0363.Google Scholar

Dullerud, G. E. and Paganini, F. A Course in Robust Control Theory: A Convex Approach, volume 36. Springer Science & Business Media, New York, USA, 2013.Google Scholar

Duncan, W. J. A suggested investigation on wing flutter. A.R.C. Report 4281 (O.159), November 1939.Google Scholar

Duncan, W. J. and Collar, A. R.. Calculations of the resistance derivatives of flutter theory. Reports and Memoranda 1500, British Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1932.Google Scholar

Duncan, W. J. and McMillan, G. A.. Reversal of aileron control due to wing twist. Reports and Memoranda 1499, British Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1932.Google Scholar

Dusto, A. R. An analytical method for predicting the stability and control characteristics of large elastic airplanes at subsonic and supersonic speeds, part I - Analysis. In 34th Meeting of the AGARD Flight Mechanics Panel, Marseille, France, 21–25 April 1969. NATO Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development.Google Scholar

EASA. Certification Specifications for Large Aeroplanes (CS-25), 2017. European Aviation Safety Agency.Google Scholar

Eichenbaum, F. D. A general theory of aircraft response to three-dimensional turbulence. Journal of Aircraft, 8(5):353–360, 1971. doi:10.2514/3.59108.Google Scholar

Enns, D. F. Model reduction with balanced realization: An error bound and a frequency weighted generalization. In Proceedings of the 23rd Conference on Decision and Control, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, December 1984. doi:10.1109/CDC.1984.272286.Google Scholar

Erickson, A. L. and Mannes, R. L.. Wind-tunnel investigation on transonic aileron flutter. Technical report, National Advisory Commitee for Aeronautics, Moffett Field, California, USA, 1949. NACA-RM-A9B28.Google Scholar

Etkin, B. Dynamics of Atmospheric Flight. Addison-Wesly Aerospace Series. John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York, USA, 1972.Google Scholar

Etkin, B. Turbulent wind and its effect on flight. Journal of Aircraft, 18(5):327–345, 1981. doi:10.2514/3.57498.Google Scholar

Eversman, W. and Tewari, A.. Consistent rational-function approximation for unsteady aerodynamics. Journal of Aircraft, 28(9):545–552, September 1991. doi:10.2514/3.46062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

FAA. Airworthiness Standards: Transport Category Airplanes. U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, 14 CFR Part 25, Appendix G. Federal Aviation Administration, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, USA, 2011.Google Scholar

Farhat, C. CFD-based nonlinear computational aeroelasticity. In Stein, E., de Borst, R., and Hughes, T. J. R., editors, Encyclopedia of Computational Mechanics, chapter 13. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, England, UK, November 2004. doi:10.1002/0470091355.ecm063.Google Scholar

Farhat, C., van der Zee, K. G., and Geuzaine, P.. Provably second-order time-accurate loosely-coupled solution algorithms for transient nonlinear computational aeroelasticity. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 195(17–18):1973-2001, 2006. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2004.11.031.Google Scholar

Fellowes, A., Wilson, T., Kemble, G., Havill, C., and Wright, J.. Wing box non-linear structural damping. In International Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics, Paris, France, 27–29 June 2011. IFASD Paper 2011-11.Google Scholar

Fournier, H., Massioni, P., Tu, M. Pham, , Bako, L., Vernay, R., and Colombo, M.. Robust gust load alleviation of flexible aircraft equipped with LIDAR. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 45(1):58–72, 2022. doi:10.2514/1.G006084.Google Scholar

Franklin, G. F., Powell, J. D., and Workman, M. L.. Digital Control ofDynamic Systems. Addison-Wesley, Menlo Park, California, USA, 3rd edition, 1998.Google Scholar

Frazer, R. A. and Duncan, W. J.. The flutter of aeroplane wings. Reports and Memoranda 1155, British Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, August 1928.Google Scholar

Frederick, M., Kerrigan, E. C., and J. M. R. Graham. Gust alleviation using rapidly deployed trailing-edge flaps. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 98(12):712–723, 2010. doi:10.1016/j.jweia.2010.06.005.Google Scholar

Friedmann, P. P. The renaissance of aeroelasticity and its future. Journal of Aircraft, 36(1): 105–121, 1999.Google Scholar

Friswell, M. I. and Mottershead, J. E.. Finite Element Model Updating in Structural Dynamics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1995.Google Scholar

Fung, Y. C. An Introduction to the Theory of Aeroelasticity. Courier Dover Publications, Mineola, New York, USA, 2008.Google Scholar

Gage, S. Creating a unified graphical wind turbulence model from multiple specifications. In AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference and Exhibit, Austin, Texas, USA, August 2003. doi:10.2514/6.2003-5529.Google Scholar

Gangsaas, D., Ly, U, and Norman, D.. Practical gust load alleviation and flutter suppression control laws based on a LQG methodology. In 19th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, St Louis, Missouri, USA, January 1981. doi:10.2514/6.1981-21.Google Scholar

Garrick, I. E. On some reciprocal relations in the theory of nonstationary flows. Technical Note >TN 629, N.A.C.A., 1938.TN+629,+N.A.C.A.,+1938.>Google Scholar

Garrick, I. E. Nonsteady Wing Characteristics, Division F., Vol. VII High Speed Aerodynamics and Jet Propulsion; Aerodynamic Components of Aircraft at High Speeds, Eds. Donovan, AF and Lawrence, HR. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA, 1957.Google Scholar

Garrick, I. E. and Reed, W. H.. Historical development of aircraft flutter. Journal of Aircraft, 18 (11):897–912, 1981.Google Scholar

Gaunaa, M. Unsteady 2D potential-flow forces on a thin variable geometry airfoil undergoing arbitrary motion. Technical report Risø-R-1478(EN), Risø National Laboratory, Denmark, 2006.Google Scholar

Gawronski, W. K. Advanced Structural Dynamics and Active Control of Structures. Springer Verlag, New York, New York, USA, 2004.Google Scholar

Gawronski, W. K. and Juang, J. N.. Model reduction in limited time and frequency intervals. International Journal of Systems Science, 21(2):349–376, 1990. doi:10.1080/00207729008910366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Géradin, M. and Cardona, A. Flexible Multibody Dynamics: A Finite Element Approach. Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, 2001.Google Scholar

Géradin, M. and Rixen, D. Mechanical Vibrations – Theory and Applications to Structural Dynamics. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK 2nd edition, 1997.Google Scholar

Glauert, H. Theoretical relationships for the lift and drag of an aerofoil structure. The Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, 27:512–518, 1923.Google Scholar

Glauert, H. The force and moment of an oscillating aerofoil. Reports and Memoranda 1242, British Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1929.Google Scholar

Goizueta, N., Wynn, A, and Palacios, R.. Parametric Krylov-based order reduction of aircraft aeroelastic models. In AIAA Science and Technology Forum and Exposition, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, 4–8 January 2021.Google Scholar

Goizueta, N., Wynn, A., Palacios, R., Drachinsky, A., and Raveh, D. E.. Flutter predictions for very flexible wing wind tunnel test. Journal of Aircraft, 59(4):1082–1097, July 2022, doi:10.2514/1.C036710.Google Scholar

Goland, M. The lutter of a uniform cantilever wing. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 12(4): 197–208, December 1945.Google Scholar

Goldstein, H., Poole, C. P., and Safko, J. Classical Mechanics. Pearson Education, Third Edition, 2014, London, UK, 2011.Google Scholar

Gonzalez-Salcedo, A., Aparicio-Sanchez, M., Munduate, X., Palacios, R., Graham, J. M. R., Pires, O., and Mendez, B.. A computationally-efficient panel code for unsteady airfoil modelling including dynamic stall. In 35th Wind Energy Symposium, Grapevine, Texas, USA, 9–13 January 2017. doi:10.2514/6.2017-2000.Google Scholar

Grauer, J. A. and Boucher, M.. System identification of flexible aircraft: lessons learned from the X-56A phase 1 flight tests. In AIAA Science and Technology Forum and Exposition, Orlando, Florida, USA, 6–10 January 2020. doi:10.2514/6.2020-1017.Google Scholar

Greenwood, D. T. Principles of Dynamics. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA, 1988.Google Scholar

Grouas, J. A very large aircraft, a challenging project for aeroelastics and loads. In International Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics, Madrid, Spain, 5–7 June 2001.Google Scholar

Gugercin, S. and Antoulas, A. C.. A survey of model reduction by balanced truncation and some new results. International Journal of Control, 77(8):748–766, 2004. doi:10.1080/00207170410001713448.Google Scholar

Guimarães Neto, A. B., G. A. Silva, R., Paglione, P., and Silvestre, F. J.. Formulation of the flight dynamics of flexible aircraft using general body axes. AIAA Journal, 54(11):3516–3534, 2016. doi:10.2514/1.j054752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haghighat, S., Liu, H. H. T. and Martins, J. R. R. A.. Model-predictive gust load alleviation controller for a highly lexible aircraft. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 35(6): 1751–1766, November 2012a. doi:10.2514/1.57013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haghighat, S., Martins, J. R. R. A., and Liu, H. H. T.. Aeroservoelastic design optimization of a flexible wing. Journal of Aircraft, 49(2):432–143, 2012b. doi:10.2514/1.C031344.Google Scholar

Hahn, K.-U. and König, R.. ATTAS flight test and simulation results of the advanced gust management system LARS. In AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, Hilton Head, South Carolina, USA, 10–12 August 1992, AIAA Paper 92-4343-CP.Google Scholar

Hahn, K.-W. and Schwarz, C.. Alleviation of atmospheric flow disturbance effects on aircraft response. In 26th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences (ICAS), Anchorage, Alaska, USA, 14–19 September 2008.Google Scholar

Hall, K. C. Eigenanalysis of unsteady flows about airfoils, cascades and wings. AIAA Journal, 32(12):2426–2432, December 1994. doi:10.2514/3.12309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halsey, S. A., Goodall, R. M., D. Caldwell, B., and Pearson, J. T.. Filtering structural modes in aircraft: Notch filters vs. Kalman filters. In 16th IFAC World Congress, 38(1):205–210, 2005. doi:10.3182/20050703-6-CZ-1902.00255.Google Scholar

Hansen, J. H., Duan, M., Kolmanovsky, I., and Cesnik, C. E. S.. Control allocation for maneuver and gust load alleviation of flexible aircraft. In AIAA Science and Technology Forum and Exposition, Orlando, Florida, USA, 6–10 January 2020. doi:10.2514/6.2020-1186.Google Scholar

Hariharan, N. and Leishman, J. G.. Unsteady aerodynamics of a lapped airfoil in subsonic low by indicial concepts. Journal of Aircraft, 33(5):855–868, 1996.Google Scholar

Hassard, B. D., N.D. Kazarinoff, and Wan, Y. H.. Theory and Applications of Hopf Bifurcation. Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1981.Google Scholar

Hassig, H. J. An approximate true damping solution of the flutter equation by determinant iteration. Journal of Aircraft, 8(11):885–889, 1971. doi:10.2514/3.44311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hesse, H. Consistent Aeroelastic Linearisation and Reduced-order Modelling in the Dynamics of Manoeuvring Flexible Aircraft. PhD thesis, Imperial College London, UK, 2013.Google Scholar

Hesse, H. and Palacios, R.. Consistent structural linearisation in lexible-body dynamics with large rigid-body motion. Computers & Structures, 110–111:1-14, November 2012. doi:10.1016/j.compstruc.2012.05.011.Google Scholar

Hesse, H. and Palacios, R.. Reduced-order aeroelastic models for dynamics of maneuvering flexible aircraft. AIAA Journal, 52(8):1717–1732, 2014. doi:10.2514/1.j052684.Google Scholar

Hesse, H. and Palacios, R.. Dynamic load alleviation in wake vortex encounters. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 39(4):801–813, 2016. doi:10.2514/1.G000715.Google Scholar

Hoadley, S. T. and Karpel, M.. Application of aeroservoelastic modeling using minimum-state unsteady aerodynamic approximations. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 14(6): 1267–1276, November 1991. doi:10.2514/3.20783.Google Scholar

Hoblit, F. M. Gust Loads on Aircraft: Concepts and Applications. AIAA Education Series, Reston, Virginia, USA, 1988.Google Scholar

Hodges, D. H. A mixed variational formulation based on exact intrinsic equations for dynamics of moving beams. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 26(11):1253–1273, 1990. doi:10.1016/0020-7683(90)90060-9.Google Scholar

Hodges, D. H. Nonlinear Composite Beam Theory. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, Virginia, USA, January 2006. doi:10.2514/4.866821.Google Scholar

Hodges, D. H. and Pierce, G. A.. Introduction to Structural Dynamics and Aeroelasticity. Cambridge University Press, New York, New York, USA, 2nd edition, 2014.Google Scholar

Hodges, D. H. Geometrically exact, intrinsic theory for dynamics of curved and twisted anisotropic beams. AIAA Journal, 41(6):1131–7, 2003. doi:10.2514/2.2054.Google Scholar

Hönlinger, H., H. Zimmermann, O. Sensburg, and Becker, J.. Structural aspects of active control technology. In AGARD-CP-560, Turin, Italy, 9–13 May 1994. NATO Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development.Google Scholar

Horn, R. A. and Johnson, C. R.. Matrix Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2012.Google Scholar

Houbolt, J. C. Atmospheric turbulence. AIAA Journal, 11(4):421–437, 1973.Google Scholar

Hsiao, K. M., Lin, J. Y., and Lin, W. Y.. A consistent co-rotational finite element formulation for geometrically nonlinear dynamic analysis of 3-D beams. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 169(1–2):1–18, 1999. doi:10.1016/S0045-7825(98)00152-2.Google Scholar

Hunsaker, J. C. and Wilson, E. B.. Report on behavior of aeroplanes in gusts. Technical report, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1917.Google Scholar

ICAO. Manual of the ICAO Standard Atmosphere, 3rd edition, 1993. International Civil Aviation Organization, Doc 7488-CD.Google Scholar

Jacobson, S., Britt, R. T., Freim, D., and Kelly, P.. Residual pitch oscillation (RPO) flight test and analysis on the B-2 bomber. In 39th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Long Beach, California, USA, 20–23 April 1998. doi:10.2514/6.1998-1805.Google Scholar

Johnson, W. Theory of Helicopter. Princeton University Press, Mineola, New York, USA, 1980.Google Scholar

Jones, J. G. Measured statistics of multicomponent gust patterns in atmospheric turbulence. Journal of Aircraft, 44(5):1559–1567, 2007.Google Scholar

Jones, J. R. and Cesnik, C. E. S.. Nonlinear aeroelastic analysis of the X-56A multiutility aeroelastic demonstrator. In 15th AIAA Dynamics Specialists Conference, San Diego, California, USA, 4–8 January 2016. doi:10.2514/6.2016-1799.Google Scholar

Jones, J. R. Development of a Very Flexible Testbed Aircraft for the Validation of Nonlinear Aeroelastic Codes. PhD thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA 2017.Google Scholar

Jones, J. R. and Cesnik, C. E. S.. Preliminary flight test correlations of the X-HALE aeroelastic experiment. Aeronautical Journal, 119(1217):855–870, 2015. doi:10.1017/S0001924000010952.Google Scholar

Jones, R. T. Operational treatment of the nonuniform lift theory to airplane dynamics. Technical Note 667, N.A.C.A., 1938.Google Scholar

Joseph, C. and Mohan, R.. Closed-form expressions of lift and moment coeficients for generalized camber using thin-airfoil theory. AIAA Journal, 59(10):1–7, 2021. doi:10.2514/1.j060859.Google Scholar

Joukowski, N. On the flight of birds (in Russian). Obshchestvo liubitelei estestvoznaniia, antropologit i etnografii, 73:29–43, 1891.Google Scholar

Juang, J. N. and Pappa, R. S.. An eigensystem realization algorithm for modal parameter iden-tiication and model reduction. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 8(5):620–627, 1985.doi:10.2514/3.20031.Google Scholar

Kaimal, J. C., Wyngaard, J. C., Izumi, Y., and Coté, O. R.. Spectral characteristics of surface-layer turbulence. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 98(417):563–589, 1972. doi:10.1002/qj.49709841707.Google Scholar

Kang, L. H., Kim, D. K., and Han, J. H.. Estimation of dynamic structural displacements using iber Bragg grating strain sensors. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 305(3):534–542, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karpel, M. Design for active flutter suppression and gust alleviation using state-space aeroelastic modeling. Journal of Aircraft, 19(3):221–227, 1982. doi:10.2514/3.57379.Google Scholar

Karpel, M. Time-domain aeroservoelasticity modeling using weighted unsteady aerodynamic forces. Journal of Guidance, Navigation and Control, 13(1):30–37, January 1990.Google Scholar

Karpel, M. Procedures and models for aeroservoelastic analysis and design. Zeitschrift fur Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik, 81(9):579–92, 2001. doi:10.1002/1521-4001(200109)81:9<579::AID-ZAMM579>3.0.CO;2-Z.Google Scholar

Karpel, M. and Brainin, L.. Stress considerations in reduced-size aeroelastic optimization. AIAA Journal, 33(4):716–722, 1995. doi:10.2514/3.12447.Google Scholar

Karpel, M. and Sheena, Z.. Structural optimization for aeroelastic control effectiveness. Journal of Aircraft, 26(5):493–495, May 1989. doi:10.2514/3.45791.Google Scholar

Karpel, M., Yaniv, S, and Livshits, D. S.. Integrated solution for computational static aeroelastic problems. In AIAA, NASA, and ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Bellevue, Washington, USA, 1996. doi:10.2514/6.1996-4012.Google Scholar

Karpel, M., B. Moulin, E. Presente, L. AnguitaMaderuelo, C., and Climent, H.. Dynamic gust loads analysis for transport aircraft with nonlinear control effects. In 49th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Schaumburg, Illinois, USA, 7–10 April 2008. doi:10.2514/6.2008-1994.Google Scholar

Katz, J. and Plotkin, A. Low-Speed Aerodynamics. Cambridge Aerospace Series. Cambridge University Press, New York, New York, USA, 2nd edition, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kayran, A. Küssner’s function in the sharp-edged gust problem-A correction. Journal of Aircraft, 43(5):1596–1598, 2006. doi:10.2514/1.2029.Google Scholar

Kehoe, M. W. A historical overview of flight flutter testing. Technical Memorandum TM-4720, NASA, 1995.Google Scholar

Kelley, N. D. and Jonkman, B. J.. Overview of the TurbSim stochastic inflow turbulence simulator. Technical report NREL/TP-500-41137, National Renewable Energy Laboratory 2007.Google Scholar

Kennedy, G. J., K. W. Kenway, G., and Martins, J. R. R. A.. High aspect ratio wing design: Optimal aerostructural tradeoffs for the next generation of materials. In AIAA Science and Technology Forum and Exposition, National Harbor, Maryland, USA, 13–17 January 2014. doi:10.2514/6.2014-0596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kier, T. M. An integrated loads analysis model including unsteady aerodynamic effects for position and attitude dependent gust fields. In International Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics, Paris, France, 27–29 June 2011. IFASD Paper 2011-052.Google Scholar

Kier, T. M. An integrated loads analysis model for wake vortex encounters. In International Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics, Bristol, UK, 24–26 June 2013.Google Scholar

Kim, K. and Strganac, T. W.. Nonlinear responses of a cantilever wing with a external store. In 44th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Norfolk, Virginia, USA, 7–10 April 2003. doi:10.2514/6.2003-1708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirk, D. E. Optimal Control Theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA, 1970.Google Scholar

Kitson, R. C., Lupp, C. A., and Cesnik, C. E. S.. Modeling and simulation of flexible jet transport aircraft with high-aspect-ratio wings. In 15th Dynamics Specialists Conference, San Diego, California, USA, 4–8 January 2016. doi:10.2514/6.2016-2046.Google Scholar

Klöckner, A., M. LeitnerSchlabe, D., and Looye, G.. Integrated modelling of an unmanned high-altitude solar-powered aircraft for control law design analysis. In 2nd CEAS Specialist Conference on Guidance, Navigation & Control, The Netherlands, 12–14 April 2013.Google Scholar

Ko, J., Strganac, T. W., and Kurdila, A. J.. Stability and control of a structurally nonlinear aeroelastic system. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 21(5):718–725, 1998.Google Scholar

Kopf, M., Bullinger, E., Giesseler, H. G., Adden, S., and Findeisen, R.. Model predictive control for aircraft load alleviation: Opportunities and challenges. In 2018 Annual American Control Conference, pages 2417–2424, Milwaukee, Minnesota, USA, 27-29 June 2018. doi:10.23919/ACC.2018.8430956.Google Scholar

KraftJr, C. C. Initial results of a flight investigation on a gust-alleviation system. N.A.C.A. Technical Note 3612, Washington, DC, USA, April 1956.Google Scholar

Kroll, N., M. Abu-Zurayk, D. Dimitrov, T. Franz, T. Führer, T. Gerhold, S. Görtz, R. Heinrich, C. Ilic, J. Jepsen, J. Jägersküpper, M. Kruse, A. Krumbein, S. Langer, D. Liu, R. Lie-pelt, L. Reimer, M. Ritter, A. Schwöppe, J. Scherer, F. Spiering, R. Thormann, V. Togiti,Google Scholar

Vollmer, D., and Wendisch, J. H.. DLR project Digital-X: Towards virtual aircraft design and flight testing based on high-fidelity methods. CEAS Aeronautical Journal, 7(1):3–27, 2016. doi:10.1007/sl3272-015-0179-7.Google Scholar

Krzysiak, A. and Narkiewicz, J.. Aerodynamic loads on airfoil with trailing-edge flap pitching with different frequencies. Journal of Aircraft, 43(2):407–418, 2006.Google Scholar

Kuchemann, D. A simple method for calculating the span and chordwise loading on straight and swept wings of any given aspect ratio at subsonic speeds. Technical report, Aeronautical Research Council, 1952. R.A.E. Report No. 2476.Google Scholar

Kumar, D. and Cesnik, C. E. S.. Performance enhancement in dynamic stall condition using active camber deformation. Journal of American Helicopter Society, 60(2):1–12, 2015. doi:10.4050/JAHS.60.022001.Google Scholar

Küssner, H. G. Schwingungen von Flugzeugflugeln (Flutter of aircraft wings). Luftfahrtforschung, 4:41–62, June 1929.Google Scholar

Küssner, H. G. Zusammenfassender Bericht Über den instationären Auftrieb von Flügeln (Comprehensive report on the non-stationary lift of wings). Luftfahrtforschung, 13(12):410–424, 1936.Google Scholar

Kwakernaak, H. and Sivan, R. Linear Optimal Control Systems. John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York, USA, 1972.Google Scholar

Lahooti, M., Palacios, R, and Sherwin, S. J.. Thick strip method for efficient large-eddy simulations of flexible wings in stall. In AIAA Science and Technology Forum and Exposition, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, 4–8 January 2021. doi:10.2514/6.2021-0363.Google Scholar

Lanchester, F. W. Aerodonetics. Archibald Constable & Co. Ltd., London, 1908.Google Scholar

Lanchester, F. W. Torsional vibrations of the tail of aeroplane. Reports and Memoranda 276, British Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1916.Google Scholar

Lavretsky, E. and Wise, K. A.. Robust and Adaptive Control. Advanced Textbooks in Control and Signal Processing. Springer London, London, UK 2013. doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-4396-3.Google Scholar

Le, K. C. Vibrations of Shells and Rods. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany 1999.Google Scholar

Lee, T. and Basu, S.. Measurement of unsteady boundary layer developed on an oscillating airfoil using multiple hot-film sensors. Experiments in Fluids, 25(2):108–117, 1998. doi:10.1007/s003480050214.Google Scholar

Leishman, J. G. Principles of Helicopter Aerodynamics. Cambridge Aerospace Series. Cambridge University Press, New York, New York USA, 2nd edition, 2006.Google Scholar

Levien, R. The elastica: A mathematical history. Technical report UCB/EECS-2008-103, EECS Department, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA August 2008.Google Scholar

Lewis, F. L., Xie, L., and Popa, D. Optimal and Robust Estimation: With an Introduction to Stochastic Control Theory. Automation and Control Engineering. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, Florida, USA 2nd edition, 2008.Google Scholar

Li, D., Guo, S, and Xiang, J.. Aeroelastic dynamic response and control of an airfoil section with control surface nonlinearities. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 329(22):4756–4771, 2010. doi:10.1016/j.jsv.2010.06.006.Google Scholar

Li, H. and Ekici, K.. A novel approach for lutter prediction of pitch-plunge airfoils using an efficient one-shot method. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 82:651–671, 2018. doi:10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2018.08.012.Google Scholar

Li, H. and Ekici, K.. Aeroelastic modeling of the AGARD 445.6 wing using the harmonic-balance-based one-shot method. AIAA Journal, 57(11):4885–4902, 2019. doi:10.2514/ 1.J058363.Google Scholar

Lind, R. and Brenner, M. Robust Aeroservoelastic Stability Analysis: Flight Test Applications. Advances in Industrial Control. Springer-Verlag, London, UK, 2012.Google Scholar

Livne, E. Aircraft active flutter suppression: State of the art and technology maturation needs. Journal of Aircraft, 55(1):410–452, 2018. doi:10.2514/1.C034442.Google Scholar

Livne, E. and Weisshaar, T.. Aeroelasticity of nonconventional airplane configurations-Past and future. Journal of Aircraft, 40(6):1047–1065, 2003. doi:10.2514/2.7217.Google Scholar

Lockyer, A. J., Drake, A., Bartley-Cho, J., Vartio, E., Solomon, D., and Shimko, T.. High lift over drag active (HiLDA) wing. Technical report, U.S. Air Force Research Laboratories, Wright Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, USA 2005. AFRL-VA-WP-TR-2005-3066.Google Scholar

Lomax, T. L. Structural Loads Analysis for Commercial Transport Aircraft: Theory and Practice. AIAA Education Series. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, Virginia, USA, 1996.Google Scholar

Love, A.E.H. A Treatise on the Mathematical Theory of Elasticity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1927.Google Scholar

Love, M. H., Zink, P. S., A. Wieselmann, P., and Youngren, H.. Body freedom flutter of high aspect ratio flying wings. In 46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Austin, Texas, USA, 18–21 April 2005. doi:10.2514/6.2005-1947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lu, K. J. and Kota, S.. Design of compliant mechanisms for morphing structural shapes. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 14(6):379–391, 2003. doi:10.1177/1045389X03035563.Google Scholar

Lucia, D. J. The SensorCraft configurations: A non-linear aeroservoelastic challenge for aviation. In 46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, pages 1768–1774, Austin, Texas, USA, 18-21 April 2005. AIAA Paper 2005–1943.Google Scholar

Lupp, C. A. and Cesnik, C. E. S.. A gradient-based lutter constraint including geometrically nonlinear deformations. In AIAA Science and Technology Forum and Exposition, San Diego, California, USA, 7–11 April 2019. doi:10.2514/6.2019-1212.Google Scholar

MacNeal, R. H. and McCormick, C. W.. The NASTRAN computer program for structural analysis. Computers & Structures, 1:389–112, 1972.Google Scholar

Magni, L., Raimondo, D. M., and Allgower, F, editors. Nonlinear Model Predictive Control,volume 384 of Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences. Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2009. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-01094-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mann, J. The spatial structure of neutral atmospheric surface-layer turbulence. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 273:141–168, 1994. doi:10.1017/S0022112094001886.Google Scholar

Mann, J. Wind field simulation. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 13(4):269–282, 1998. doi:10.1016/S0266-8920(97)00036-2.Google Scholar

Manwell, J. F., McGowan, J. G., and Anthony, L. Wind Energy Explained: Theory, Design and Application. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 2nd edition, 2009.Google Scholar

Maraniello, S. and Palacios, R.. Optimal rolling maneuvers with very lexible wings. AIAA Journal, 55(9):2964–2979, 2017. doi:10.2514/1.J055721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maraniello, S. and Palacios, R.. State-space realizations and internal balancing in potential-flow aerodynamics with arbitrary kinematics. AIAA Journal, 57(6):2308–2321, 2019. doi:10.2514/1.J058153.Google Scholar

Maraniello, S. and Palacios, R.. Parametric reduced-order modeling of the unsteady vortex-lattice method. AIAA Journal, 58(5):2206–2220, 2020. doi:10.2514/1.j058894.Google Scholar

Marsden, J. E. and Hughes, T. J. R.. Mathematical Foundations of Elasticity. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA, 1983Google Scholar

Martinez, J. R., Flick, P. M., Perdzock, J., Dale, G., and Davis, M. B.. An overview of SensorCraft capabilities and key enabling technologies. In AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, August 2008. doi:10.2514/6.2008-7185.Google Scholar

Matsuzaki, Y., T. UedaMiyazawa, Y., and Matsushita, H.. Gust load alleviation of a transport-type wing: Test and analysis. Journal of Aircraft, 26(4):322–327, 1989. doi:10.2514/3.45763.Google Scholar

Mayo, A. J. and Antoulas, A. C.. A framework for the solution of the generalized realization problem. Linear Algebra and Its Applications, 425(2-3):634–662, 2007. doi:10.1016/j.laa.2007.03.008.Google Scholar

McCroskey, W. J. Unsteady airfoils. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 14(1):285–311, 1982.Google Scholar

Meirovitch, L. Hybrid state equations of motion for flexible bodies in terms of quasicoordinates. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 14(5):1008–1013, 1991. doi:10.2514/3.20743.Google Scholar

Meirovitch, L. and Tuzcu, I.. Unified theory for the dynamics and control of maneuvering flexible aircraft. AIAA Journal, 42(4):714–727, April 2004. doi:10.2514/1.1489. MIL-HDBK-1797. Flying Qualities of Piloted Aircraft. U.S. Department of Defense, December 1997.Google Scholar

MIL-HDBK-516B. Airworthiness Certification Criteria. U.S. Department of Defense, 2005.Google Scholar

MIL-STD-1540C. Test Requirements for Launch, Upper-Stage, and Space Vehicles. U.S. Department of Defense, September 1994.Google Scholar

Millikan, W. F. Progress in dynamic stability and control research. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, 14(9):493–519, 1947. doi:10.2514/8.1434.Google Scholar

Milne, R. D. Dynamics of the deformable aeroplane, Parts I and II. Report 3345, Aeronautical Research Council, London, UK 1962.Google Scholar

Milne, R. D. Some remarks on the dynamics of deformable bodies. AIAA Journal, 6(3):556–558, 1968.Google Scholar

Moore, B. Principal component analysis in linear systems: Controllability, observability, and model reduction. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 26(1):17–32, 1981. doi:10.1109/TAC.1981.1102568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morino, L. and Bernardini, G.. Singularities in BIEs for the Laplace equation; Joukowski trailing-edge conjecture revisited. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 25(9): 805–818, October 2001. doi:10.1016/S0955-7997(01)00063-7.Google Scholar

Mouyon, P. and Imbert, N.. Identification of a 2D turbulent wind spectrum. Aerospace Science and Technology, 6(8):599–605, 2002. doi:10.1016/S1270-9638(02)01198-7.Google Scholar

Muñoz Simón, A., Palacios, R, and Wynn, A.. Some modelling improvements for prediction of wind turbine rotor loads in turbulent wind. Wind Energy, 22(2):333–353, 2022. doi:10.1002/we.2675.Google Scholar

Munk, M. M. General theory of thin wing sections. N.A.C.A. Report No. 142, 1922.Google Scholar

Muñoz-Esparza, D., B. Kosovicvan Beeck, J., and Mirocha, J.. A stochastic perturbation method to generate inflow turbulence in large-eddy simulation models: Application to neutrally stratified atmospheric boundary layers. Physics of Fluids, 27(3):035102, 2015. doi:10.1063/1.4913572.Google Scholar

Murrow, H. N., Pratt, K. M., and Houbolt, J. C.. N.A.C.A./NASA research related to evolution of U.S. gust design criteria. In 30th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Mobile, Alabama, USA, 03–05 April 1989. doi:10.2514/6.1989-1373.Google Scholar

Murua, J., Palacios, R, and Peiro, J.. Camber effects in the dynamic aeroelasticity of compliant airfoils. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 26:527–543, 2010. doi:10.1016/j. jfluidstructs.2010.01.009.Google Scholar

Murua, J., Palacios, R, and Graham, J. M. R.. Applications of the unsteady vortex-lattice method in aircraft aeroelasticity and flight dynamics. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 55:46–72, November 2012. doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2012.06.001.Google Scholar

Murua, J., P. Martinez, H. Climentvan Zyl, L. H., and Palacios, R.. T-tail flutter: Potential-flow modelling, experimental validation and flight tests. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 71: 54–84, November 2014. doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2014.07.002.Google Scholar

Nelson, R. C. Flight Stability and Automatic Control. McGraw-Hill, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, 2nd edition, 1998.Google Scholar

Ng, B. F., Palacios, R., Kerrigan, E. C., M. R. Graham, J., and Hesse, H.. Aerodynamic load control in horizontal axis wind turbines with combined aeroelastic tailoring and trailing-edge flaps. WindEnergy, 19(2):243–263, 2015. doi:10.1002/we.1830.Google Scholar

Ng, B. F., Palacios, R., and Graham, J. M. R.. Model-based aeroelastic analysis and blade load alleviation of offshore wind turbines. International Journal of Control, 90(1):15–36, 2017. doi:10.1080/00207179.2015.1068456.Google Scholar

Nguyen, N., K. TrinhNguyen, D., and Tuzcu, I.. Nonlinear aeroelasticity of flexible wing structure coupled with aircraft flight dynamics. In 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, 23–26 April 2012. doi:10.2514/6.2012-1792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nguyen, N., J. FugateXiong, J., and Kaul, U.. Flutter analysis of the transonic truss-braced wing aircraft using transonic correction. In AIAA Science and Technology Forum and Exposition, San Diego, California, USA, 7–11 January 2019. doi:10.2514/6.2019-0217.Google Scholar

Nickel, K. and Wohlfahrt, M. Tailless Aircraft in Theory and Practice. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, England, 1994.Google Scholar

Niu, M. C. Y. Airframe Structural Design: Practical Design Information. Hong Kong Conmilit Press, Hong Kong, 2nd edition, 1999.Google Scholar

Nocedal, J. and Wright, S. J.. Numerical Optimization. Springer, New York, New York, USA, 2nd edition, 2006.Google Scholar

Noll, T. E., M Brown, J., E Perez-Davis, M., D Ishmael, S., Tiffany, G. C, and Gaier, M.. Investigation of the Helios prototype aircraft mishap. Mishap Report: Volume 1, NASA, January 2004.Google Scholar

Norris, G. and Wagner, M. Boeing 787 Dreamliner. Zenith Press, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, 2009.Google Scholar

Oliver, M., J. Rodriguez Ahlquist, J. M. Carreno, H. ClimentDe Diego, R., and De Alba, J.. A400M GVT: The challenge of nonlinear modes in very large GVT. In International Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics, Seattle, Washington, USA, June 22–25 2009.Google Scholar

Ouellette, J. A. and Valdez, F. D.. Generation and calibration of linear models of aircraft with highly coupled aeroelastic and flight dynamics. In AIAA Science and Technology Forum and Exposition, Orlando, Florida, USA, 6–10 January 2020. doi:10.2514/6.2020-1016.Google Scholar

Pak, C. and Truong, S.. Creating a test-validated finite-element model of the X-56A aircraft structure. Journal of Aircraft, 52(5):1644–1667, 2015. doi:10.2514/1.C033043.Google Scholar

Palacios, R. Nonlinear normal modes in an intrinsic theory of anisotropic beams. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 330(8):1772–1792, 2011.Google Scholar

Palacios, R. and Cea, A.. Nonlinear modal condensation of large finite element models: Application of Hodges’s intrinsic theory. AIAA Journal, 57(10):4255–4268, 2019. doi:10.2514/1.J057556.Google Scholar

Palacios, R. and Cesnik, C. E. S.. Cross-sectional analysis of non-homogeneous anisotropic active slender structures. AIAA Journal, 43(12):2624–2638, 2005.Google Scholar

Palacios, R., H. ClimentKarlsson, A., and Winzell, B.. Assessment of strategies for correcting linear unsteady aerodynamics using CFD or experimental results. In International Forum on Aeroelasiticy and Structural Dynamics, Madrid, Spain, 5–7 June 2001.Google Scholar

Palacios, R., Murua, J, and Cook, R.. Structural and aerodynamic models in the nonlinear flight dynamics of very flexible aircraft. AIAA Journal, 48(11):2648–2659, November 2010. doi:10.2514/1.J050513.Google Scholar

Panchal, J. and Benaroya, H.. Review of control surface freeplay. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 127:100729, November 2021. doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2021.100729.Google Scholar

Pankonien, A. M., Suh, P. M., R. Schaefer, J., and Mitchell, R. M.. Deadbands tell no tails: X-56A dynamic actuation requirements. In ASME 2020 Conference on Smart Materials, Adaptive Structures and Intelligent Systems, Virtual conference, 15 September 2020. doi:10.1115/smasis2020-2427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parenteau, M. and Laurendeau, E.. A general modal frequency-domain vortex lattice method for aeroelastic analyses. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 99:103146, 2020. doi:10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2020.103146.Google Scholar

Pasinetti, G. and Mantegazza, P.. Single finite states modeling of aerodynamic forces related to structural motions and gusts. AIAA Journal, 37(5):604–612, 1999. doi:10.2514/2.760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Patil, M. J. From fluttering wings to flapping flight: The energy connection. Journal of Aircraft, 40(2):270–276, 2003. doi:10.2514/2.3119.Google Scholar

Patil, M. J. and Hodges, D. H.. Flight dynamics of highly flexible flying wings. Journal of Aircraft, 43(6):1790–1798, 2006. doi:10.2514/1.17640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Patil, M. J., Hodges, D. H., and Cesnik, C. E. S.. Nonlinear aeroelastic analysis of aircraft with high-aspect-ratio wings. In 39th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Long Beach, California, USA, 20–23 April 1998. doi:10.2514/6.1998-1955.Google Scholar

Patil, M. J., Hodges, D. H., and Cesnik, C. E. S.. Nonlinear aeroelasticity and flight dynamics of high-altitude long-endurance aircraft. Journal of Aircraft, 38(1):88–94, 2001. doi:10.2514/2.2738.Google Scholar

Payne, C. B. A flight investigation of some effects of automatic control on gust loads. N.A.C.A.Google Scholar

Research Memorandum L53E14a, Washington, DC, USA, July 1953.Google Scholar

Penzl, T. Numerical solution of generalized Lyapunov equations. Advances in Computational Mathematics, 8(1):33–18, 1998. doi:10.1023/A:1018979826766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Penzl, T. Algorithms for model reduction of large dynamical systems. Linear Algebra and Its Applications, 415(2-3):322–343, 2006. doi:10.1016/j.laa.2006.01.007.Google Scholar

Pereira, M. F. V., Kolmanovsky, I., Cesnik, C. E. S., and Vetrano, F.. Model predictive control for maneuver load alleviation in flexible airliners. In International Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics, Savannah, Georgia, USA, 9–13 June 2019a. IFASD Paper No 2019-018.Google Scholar

Pereira, M. F. V., Kolmanovsky, I., Cesnik, C. E. S., and Vetrano, F.. Model predictive control architectures for maneuver load alleviation in very flexible aircraft. In AIAA Science and Technology Forum and Exposition, San Diego, California, USA, 7–11 January 2019b. doi:10.2514/6.2019-159.Google Scholar

Pereira, M. F. V., Kolmanovsky, I., Cesnik, C. E. S., and Vetrano, F.. Time-distributed scenario-based model predictive control approach for flexible aircraft. In AIAA Science and Technology Forum and Exposition, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, 4–8 January 2021. doi:10.2514/6.2021-0502.Google Scholar

Pereira, M. F. V., Kolmanovsky, I, and C. E. S. Cesnik. Nonlinear model predictive control with aggregated constraints, Automatica, 146:1106–1149, December 2022a. doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2022.110649.Google Scholar

Pereira, M. F. V., M. Duan, C. E. S. Cesnik, , Kolmanovsky, I., and Vetrano, F.. Model predictive control for very flexible aircraft based on linear parameter varying reduced-order models, In International Forum on Structural Dynamics and Aeroelasticity, Madrid, Spain, 13–17 June 2022b.Google Scholar

Pereira, M. F. V., G. B. Chaves, R. M. Bertolin, I. Kolmanovsky, and Cesnik, C. E. S.. Experimental validation of model predictive controllers for load alleviation in very flexible aircraft, In International Forum on Structural Dynamics and Aeroelasticity, Madrid, Spain, 13–17 June 2022c.Google Scholar

Perkins, C. D. Development of airplane stability and control technology. Journal of Aircraft,7 (4):290–301, 1970. doi:10.2514/3.44167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pesmajoglou, S. D. and Graham, J. M. R.. Prediction of aerodynamic forces on horizontal axis wind turbines in free yaw and turbulence. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 86(1):1–14, 2000. doi:10.1016/S0167-6105(99)00125-7.Google Scholar

Peters, D. A. and M. J. Johnson. Finite-state airloads for deformable airfoils on fixed and rotating wings. In ASME Symposium on Aeroelasticity and Fluid-Structure Interaction, volume 44, page 1–28, Fairfield, New Jersey, USA, November 1994.Google Scholar

Phillips, W. B. Loads implications of gust-alleviation systems. N.A.C.A. Technical Note 4056, Washington, DC, USA, June 1957.Google Scholar

Pope, S. B. Turbulent Flows. Cambridge University Press, New York, New York, USA, 2000.Google Scholar

Possio, C. L’azione aerodinamica sul profilo oscillante in un fluido compressibile a velocita iposonora. L’Aerotecnica, 18(4):441–458, 1938.Google Scholar

Pratt, K. G. A revised formula for the calculation of gust loads. Technical Note 2964, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Langley Aeronautical Laboratory, 1953.Google Scholar

Press, H., Meadows, M. T., and Hadlock, I.. Estimates of probability distribution of root-mean- square gust velocity of atmospheric turbulence from operational gust-load data by random- process theory. Technical Note 3362, N.A.C.A. 1955.Google Scholar

Preumont, A. Vibration Control of Active Structures: An Introduction. Springer International Publishing, Berlin, Germany, 4th edition, 2018.Google Scholar

Pugsley, A. G. The influence of wing elasticity upon longitudinal stability. Reports and Memoranda 1548, British Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, January 1933.Google Scholar

Quero, D., Vuillemin, P, and Poussot-Vassal, C.. A generalized state-space aeroservoe-lastic model based on tangential interpolation. Aerospace, 6(1):9, 2019. doi:10.3390/ aerospace6010009.Google Scholar

Quero, D., Vuillemin, P, and Poussot-Vassal, C.. A generalized eigenvalue solution to the flutter stability problem with true damping: The p-L method. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 103: 103266, 2021. doi:10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2021.103266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rabadan, G. J., Schmitt, N. P., Pistner, T., and Rehm, W.. Airborne LIDAR for automatic feedforward control of turbulent in-flight phenomena. Journal of Aircraft, 47(2):392–403, March-April 2010.Google Scholar

Ramesh, K., A. Gopalarathnam, K. Granlund, M. V. Ol, and Edwards, J. R.. Discrete-vortex method with novel shedding criterion for unsteady aerofoil flows with intermittent leading-edge vortex shedding. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 751:500–538, 2014. doi:10.1017/jfm.2014.297.Google Scholar

Raveh, D. E., Levy, Y., and Karpel, M.. Efficient aeroelastic analysis using computational unsteady aerodynamics. Journal of Aircraft, 38(3):547–556, 2001. doi:10.2514/2.2795.Google Scholar

Rawlings, J. B., Mayne, D. Q., and Diehl, M. Model Predictive Control: Theory, Computation, and Design. Nob Hill Publishing, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, 2017.Google Scholar

Rea, J. B. Aeroelasticity and stability and control. Wright Air Development Center, WADC TR 55–173, Ohio, USA, 1957.Google Scholar

Reddy,J.N. Energy Principles and Variational Methods in Applied Mechanics. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, USA, 2nd edition, 2002.Google Scholar

Reeh, A. D. and Tropea, C.. Behaviour of a natural laminar flow aerofoil in flight through atmospheric turbulence. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 767:394–429, 2015. doi:10.1017/jfm.2015.49.Google Scholar

Regan, C. D. and Jutte, C. V.. Survey of applications of active control technology for gust alleviation and new challenges for lighter-weight aircraft. Technical report, NASA Dryden Flight Research Center, Edwards, California, USA, April 2012.Google Scholar

Reimer, L., Ritter, M., Heinrich, R., and Krüger, W. R.. CFD-based gust load analysis for a free-flying flexible passenger aircraft in comparison to a DLM-based approach. In 22nd AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Dallas, Texas, USA, June 2015. doi:10.2514/6.2015-2455.Google Scholar

Reissner, E. On one-dimensional large-displacement finite-strain beam theory. Studies in Applied Mathematics, 52(2):87–95, June 1973.Google Scholar

Reissner, H. Neurere probleme aus der flugzeugstatik. Zeitschrift für Flugtechnik und Motorluftschiffahrt, 17:137–146, April 1926.Google Scholar

Ricci, S., Marchetti, L., Riccobene, L., De Gaspari, A., Toffol, F., Fonte, F., Mantegazza, P., Berg, J., Morgansen, K. A., and Livne, E.. An active flutter suppression (AFS) project: Overview, results and lessons learned. In AIAA Science and Technology Forum and Exposition, Virtual Event, 11–21 January 2021. doi:10.2514/6.2021-0908.Google Scholar

Ricciardi, A. P., Patil, M. J., A. Canfield, R., and Lindsley, N.. Evaluation of quasi-static gust loads certification methods for high-altitude long-endurance aircraft. Journal of Aircraft, 50 (2):457–468, 2013. doi:10.2514/1.C031872.Google Scholar

Richardson, J. R., Atkins, E. M., T. Kabamba, P., and Girard, A. R.. Envelopes for flight through stochastic gusts. Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics, 36(5):1464–1476, 2013.doi:10.2514/1.57849.Google Scholar

Ripepi, M. and Mantegazza, P.. Improved matrix fraction approximation of aerodynamic transfer matrices. AIAA Journal, 51(5):1156–1173, 2013. doi:10.2514/1.J052009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Riso, C. and Cesnik, C. E. S.. Correlations between UM/NAST nonlinear aeroelastic simulations and the pre-Pazy wing experiment. In AIAA Science and Technology Forum and Exposition, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, 4–8 January 2021. doi:10.2514/6.2021-1712.Google Scholar

Riso, C. and Cesnik, C. E. S.. Investigation of geometrically nonlinear effects in the aeroelastic behavior of a very flexible wing, In AIAA Science and Technology Forum and Exposition (SciTech2023), National Harbor, Maryland, USA, 23–27 January 2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Riso, C., Sanghi, D., Cesnik, C. E. S., Vetrano, F., and Teufel, P.. Parametric roll maneuverability analysis of a high-aspect-ratio-wing civil transport aircraft, In AIAA Science and Technology Forum and Exposition (SciTech2020), 61st AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, StructuralDynamics, and Materials Conference, Orlando, Florida, USA, 6–10 January 2020. AIAA-2020-1191. doi:10.2514/6.2020-1191.Google Scholar

Rodden, W. P. The development of the doublet-lattice method. In International Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics, Rome, Italy, 17–20 June 1997.Google Scholar

Ahlquist, Rodriguez, , J., Carreno, J. M., Climent, H., De Diego, R., and De Alba, J.. Assessment of nonlinear structural response in A400M GVT. In 28th International Modal Analysis Conference (IMAC 28), Jacksonville, Florida, USA, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roesler, B. T. and Epps, B. P.. Discretization requirements for vortex lattice methods to match unsteady aerodynamics theory. AIAA Journal, 56(6):2478–2483, 2018. doi:10.2514/ 1.j056400.Google Scholar

Roger, K. L. Airplane math modelling and active aeroelastic control design. In AGARD Structures and Materials Panel, Loughton, Essex, UK, 1977. AGARD-CP-228.Google Scholar

Roger, K. L. and Hodges, G. E.. Active flutter suppression-A flight test demonstration. Journal of Aircraft, 12(6):410–450, June 1975.Google Scholar

Routh, E. J. A Treatise on the Stability of a Given State of Motion, Particularly Steady Motion. MacMillian, London, UK, 1877.Google Scholar

Rule, J. A., Cox, D. E., and Clark, R. L.. Aerodynamic model reduction through balanced realization. AIAA Journal, 42(5):1045–1048, May 2004. doi:10.2514/1.9596.Google Scholar

Ryan, J. J., Bosworth, J. T., J. Burken, J., and Suh, P. M.. Current and future research in active control of lightweight, flexible structures using the X-56 aircraft. In 52nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting, National Harbor, Maryland, USA, 13–17 January 2014. doi:10.2514/6.2014-0597.Google Scholar

Sahoo, D. and C. E. S. Cesnik. Roll maneuver control of UCAV wing using anisotropic piezoelectric actuators. In 43rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Denver, Colorado, USA, 22–25 April 2002. doi:10.2514/6.2002-1720.Google Scholar

Saltari, F., Riso, C., Matteis, G., and Mastroddi, F.. Finite-element-based modeling for flight dynamics and aeroelasticity of flexible aircraft. Journal of Aircraft, 54(6):2350–2366, 2017. doi:10.2514/1.c034159.Google Scholar

Sanghi, D., Riso, C, and Cesnik, C. E. S.. Conventional and unconventional control effectors for load alleviation in high-aspect-ratio-wing aircraft, In AIAA Science and Technology Forum and Exposition (SciTech2022), San Diego, California, USA, 3–7 January 2022.Google Scholar

Sanghi, D., C. Cesnik, E. S., and Riso, C.. Roll maneuvers of very flexible aircraft with flared folding wingtips, In AIAA Science and Technology Forum and Exposition (SciTech2023), National Harbor, Maryland, USA, 23–27 January 2023.Google Scholar

Sarpkaya, T., Robins, R. E., and Delisi, D. P.. Wake-vortex eddy-dissipation model predictions compared with observations. Journal of Aircraft, 38(4):687–692, July 2001. doi:10.2514/ 2.2820.Google Scholar

Schmidt, D. K. Modern Flight Dynamics. Mc-Graw Hill, New York, New York, USA, 2012.Google Scholar

Schmidt, D. K. Discussion: “The Lure of the Mean Axes” (Meirovitch, L., and Tuzcu, I., ASME J. Appl. Mech., 74(3), pp. 497–504). Journal of Applied Mechanics, 82(12):125501, December 2015. doi:10.1115/1.4031567.Google Scholar

Scott, R. C., Castelluccio, M. A., A. Coulson, D., and Heeg, J.. Aeroservoelastic wind-tunnel tests of a free-flying, joined-wing SensorCraft model for gust load alleviation. In 52nd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, pages 1–36, Denver, Colorado, USA, 4-7 April 2011. doi:10.2514/6.2011-1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scott, R. C., Vetter, T. K., B. Penning, K., Coulson, D. A., and J. Heeg. Aeroservoelastic testing of a sidewall mounted free flying wind-tunnel model. In AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, 18–21 August 2008. doi:10.2514/6.2008-7186.Google Scholar

Sears, W. R. Some aspects of non-stationary airfoil theory and its practical application. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, 8(3):104–108, 1941.Google Scholar

Sears, W. R. Stories from a 20th Century Life. Parabolic Press Ltd, Stanford, California, USA, 1994.Google Scholar

Sears, W. R. and von Kármán, T.. Airfoil theory for non-uniform motion. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, 5:379–390, 1938.Google Scholar

Shabana, A. A. Theory of Vibration. Volume II: Discrete and Continuous Systems. Mechanical Engineering Series. Springer US, New York, New York, USA, 1991a. doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-0380-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shabana, A. A. Theory of Vibration. Volume I: Introduction. Mechanical Engineering Series. Springer US, New York, New York, USA, 1991b. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-94271-1.Google Scholar

Shabana, A. A. Flexible multibody dynamics: Review of past and recent developments. Multibody System Dynamics, 1(2):189–222, 1997. doi:10.1023/A:1009773505418.Google Scholar

Sharman, R. D., Trier, S. B., P. Lane, L., and Doyle, J. D.. Sources and dynamics of turbulence in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere: A review. Geophysical Research Letters, 39, 2012. doi:10.1029/2012GL051996.Google Scholar

Sharqi, B. and Cesnik, C. E. S.. Ground vibration testing on very flexible aircraft, In AIAA Science and Technology Forum and Exposition (SciTech2020), 61st AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Orlando, Florida, USA, 6–10 January 2020.Google Scholar

Sharqi, B. and Cesnik, C. E. S.. Finite element model updating for very flexible aircraft, Journal of Aircraft, 14 pages, October 2022. doi:10.2514/1.C036894Google Scholar

Shearer, C. M. Coupled Nonlinear Flight Dynamics, Aeroelasticity, and Control of Very Flexible Aircraft. PhD thesis, Aerospace Engineering, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, 2006.Google Scholar

Shearer, C. M. and C. E. S. Cesnik. Nonlinear flight dynamics of very flexible aircraft. Journal of Aircraft, 44(5):1528–1545, 2007. doi:10.2514/1.27606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shearer, C. M. and Cesnik, C. E. S.. Trajectory control for very flexible aircraft. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 31(2):340–357, March-April 2008. doi:10.2514/1.29335.Google Scholar

Silva, W. A. Identification of linear and nonlinear aerodynamic impulse responses using digital filter techniques. In 22nd AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, August 1997. doi:10.2514/6.1997-3712.Google Scholar

Silva, W. A. Simultaneous excitation of multiple-input/multiple-output CFD-based unsteady aerodynamic systems. Journal of Aircraft, 45(4):1267–1274, 2008. doi:10.2514/1.34328.Google Scholar

Silva, W. A. and Bartels, R. E.. Development of reduced-order models for aeroelastic analysis and flutter prediction using the CFL3Dv6.0 code. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 19(6): 729–745, 2004. doi:10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2004.03.004.Google Scholar

Silva, W. A. and Dunn, S.. Higher-order spectral analysis of F-18 flight flutter data. In 45th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Austin, Texas, USA, 18–21 April 2005. doi:10.2514/6.2005-2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silva, W. A., Beran, P. S., E. S. Cesnik, C., Guendel, R. E., Kurdila, A., and Prazenica, R. J.. Reduced-order modeling: Cooperative research and development at NASA Lan- gley Research Center. In International Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics, Madrid, Spain, 5–7 June 2001.Google Scholar

Simiriotis, N., and Palacios, R.. A numerical investigation on direct and data-driven flutter prediction methods. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 117:103835, 2023 doi:10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2023.103835.Google Scholar

Simó, J. C. and Vu-Quoc, L.. On the dynamics of flexible beams under large overall motions - The plane case: Part II. ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics, 53:855–863, 1986. doi:10.1115/1.3171871.Google Scholar

Simó, J. C. and Vu-Quoc, L.. On the dynamics in space of rods undergoing large motions - A geometrically exact approach. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 66(2):125–161, 1988. doi:10.1016/0045-7825(88)90073-4.Google Scholar

Simpson, R. J. S., Palacios, R, and S. Maraniello. State-space realizations of potential-flow unsteady aerodynamics with arbitrary kinematics. In 58th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Kissimmee, Florida, USA, 9—13 January 2017. doi:10.2514/6.2017-1595.Google Scholar

Simpson, R. J. S., Palacios, R, and Murua, J.. Induced drag calculations in the unsteady vortex-lattice method. AIAA Journal, 51(7):1775—1779, 2013. doi:10.2514/1.J052136.Google Scholar

Simpson, R. J. S., R. Palacios, H. Hesse, and Goulart, P. J.. Predictive control for alleviation of gust loads on very flexible aircraft. In 55th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, National Harbor, Maryland, USA, 13—17 April 2014. doi:10.2514/6.2014-0843.Google Scholar

Skogestad, S. and Postlethwaite, I. Multivariate Feedback Control, Analysis & Design. John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York, USA, 2nd edition, 2005.Google Scholar

Skujins, T. and Cesnik, C. E. S.. Reduced-order modeling of unsteady aerodynamics across multiple Mach regimes. Journal of Aircraft, 51(6):1681—1704, 2014. doi:10.2514/1.C032222.Google Scholar

Sleeper, R. K. Spanwise measurements of vertical components of atmospheric turbulence. Technical report 2963, NASA, April 1990.Google Scholar

Smilg, B. and Wasserman, L. S.. Application of three-dimensional flutter theory to aircraft structures. Air Corps Technical report 4798, 1942.Google Scholar

Smith, M. J., Hodges, D. H., and Cesnik, C. E. S.. An evaluation of computational algorithms to interface between CFD and CSD methodologies. WL-TR-96-3055, Flight Dynamics Directorate, Wright Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, USA, 1995.Google Scholar

Smith, M. J., E. S. Cesnik, C., and Hodges, D. H.. Evaluation of computational algorithms suitable for fluid-structure interactions. Journal of Aircraft, 37(2):282—294, 2000. doi:10.2514/2.2592.Google Scholar

Spalart, P. R. Airplane trailing vortices. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 30:107, 1998.Google Scholar

Spielberg, I. N. The two-dimensional incompressible aerodynamic coefficients for oscillatory changes in airfoil camber. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, 20:432—134, June 1953.Google Scholar

Stanford, B. K. Optimal aircraft control surface layouts for maneuver and gust load alleviation. In AIAA Science and Technology Forum and Exposition, Orlando, Florida, USA, 6—10 January 2020. doi:10.2514/6.2020-0448.Google Scholar

Stengel, R. F. Flight Dynamics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA, 2004.Google Scholar

Stevens, B. L., Lewis, F. L., and Johnson, E. N. Aircraft Control and Simulation. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, USA, 3rd edition, 2016.Google Scholar

Strganac, T. W. and Mook, D. T.. Numerical model of unsteady subsonic aeroelastic behavior. AIAA Journal, 28(5):903—909, 1990. doi:10.2514/3.25137.Google Scholar

Strganac, T. W., Cizmas, P. G., Nichkawde, C., Gargoloff, J., and Beran, P. S.. Aeroelas-tic analysis for future air vehicle concepts using a fully nonlinear methodology. In 46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Austin, Texas, USA, 18—21 April 2005. doi:10.2514/6.2005-2171.Google Scholar

Strong, D. D., Kolonay, R. M., J. Huttsell, L., and Flick, P. M.. Flutter analysis of wing configurations using pre-stressed frequencies and mode shapes. In 46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Austin, Texas, USA, 18—21 April 2005. doi:10.2514/6.2005-2173.Google Scholar

Su, W. Development of an aeroelastic formulation for deformable airfoils using orthogonal polynomials. AIAA Journal, 55(8):2793—2807, 2017. doi:10.2514/1.J055665.Google Scholar

Su, W. and Cesnik, C. E. S.. Nonlinear aeroelasticity of a very lexible blended-wing-body aircraft. Journal of Aircraft, 47(5):1539—1553, 2010. doi:10.2514/1.47317.Google Scholar

Su, W. and Cesnik, C. E. S.. Dynamic response of highly flexible flying wings. AIAA Journal, 49(2):324–339, 2011a. doi:10.2514/1.J050496.Google Scholar

Su, W. and Cesnik, C. E. S.. Strain-based geometrically nonlinear beam formulation for modeling very flexible aircraft. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 48:2349–2360, 2011b. doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2011.04.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Suryakumar, V. S., Babbar, Y., Strganac, T. W., and Mangalam, A. S.. Unsteady aerodynamic model based on the leading-edge stagnation point. Journal of Aircraft, 53(6):1626–1637, 2016. doi:10.2514/1.C033602.Google Scholar

Tang, D. M. and Dowell, E. H.. Experimental and theoretical study on aeroelastic response of high-aspect-ratio wings. AIAA Journal, 39(8):1430–1441, 2001. doi:10.2514/2.1484.Google Scholar

Tang, D. M. and Dowell, E. H.. Limit cycle oscillations of two-dimensional panels in low subsonic flow. International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics, 37(7):1199–1209, October 2002.Google Scholar

Taylor, G. The spectrum of turbulence. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 164:476490, 1938.Google Scholar

Taylor, P. F., Moreno, R., Banavara, N., K. Narisetti, R., and Morgan, L.. Flutter flight testing at Gulfstream Aerospace using advanced signal processing techniques. In 58th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Grapevine, Texas, USA, 9–13 January 2017. doi:10.2514/6.2017-1823.Google Scholar

Teixeira, P. C. and Cesnik, C. E. S.. Propeller effects on the response of high-altitude long-endurance aircraft. AIAA Journal, 57(10):4328–4342, 2019. doi:10.2514/1.J057575.Google Scholar

Teixeira, P. C. and Cesnik, C. E. S.. Propeller inluence on the aeroelastic stability of high altitude long endurance aircraft. Aeronautical Journal, 124(1275):703–730, 2020. doi:10.1017/aer.2019.165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tessler, A. and Dong, S. B.. On a hierarchy of conforming Timoshenko beam elements. Computers & Structures, 14(3-l):335–344, 1981. doi:10.1016/0045-7949(81)90017-1.Google Scholar

Teufel, P., Hanel, M, and Well, K. H.. Integrated light mechanic and aeroelastic modelling and control of a lexible aircraft considering multidimensional gust input. Technical report, RTO-MP-36, In RTO Meeting Proceedings on Structural Aspects of Flexible Aircraft Control, DTIC Document, 2000.Google Scholar

Theodorsen, T. General theory of aerodynamic instability and the mechanism of lutter. Report 496, N.A.C.A. 1935.Google Scholar

Theodorsen, T. and Garrick, I. E.. General potential theory of arbitrary wing sections. Report 452, N.A.C.A. 1934.Google Scholar

Theodorsen, T. and Garrick, I. E.. Mechanism of lutter. A theoretical and experimental investigation of the flutter problem. Report 685, N.A.C.A. 1938.Google Scholar

Thomas, J. P., Dowell, E. H., and Hall, K. C.. Nonlinear inviscid aerodynamic effects on transonic divergence, flutter and limit cycle oscillations. AIAA Journal, 40(4):638–646, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thormann, R. and Widhalm, M.. Linear-frequency-domain predictions of dynamic-response data for viscous transonic flows. AIAA Journal, 51(11):2540–2557, 2013. doi:10.2514/ 1.J051896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tiffany, S. H. and Adams, W. M.. Nonlinear programming extensions to rational function approximation methods for unsteady aerodynamic forces. Technical Publication 2776, NASA, 1988.Google Scholar