Abbott, S. P., Reed, E., Abbott, R. D., & Berninger, V. W. (1997). Year-long balanced reading/writing tutorial: A design experiment used for dynamic assessment. Learning Disability Quarterly, 20, 249–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Albrecht, J. E., O'Brien, E. J., Mason, R. A., & Myers, J. L. (1995). The role of perspective in the accessibility of goals during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21(2), 364–372.Google ScholarPubMed

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and the National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

Anastasi, A. (1965). Individual differences. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Aranov, Z. (1999). Validity and reliability of the ACFS Behavior Observation Scale. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED438294; Clearinghouse Identifier: TM030602)

Ashman, A. F. (1992). Process-based instruction: Integrating assessment and instruction. In Haywood, H. C. & Tzuriel, D. (Eds.), Interactive assessment (pp. 375–396). New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bain, B. A. (1994). A framework for dynamic assessment in phonology: Stimulability revisited. Clinical Communication Disorders, 4(1), 12–22.Google ScholarPubMed

Balzac, T., & Gaines, D. M. (n.d.). Dynamic multiple assessment: An instructional method that captures the symbiosis of assessment and instruction. Online download: Citeseer.ist.psu.edu/295525.html.

Barrera, M. (2003). Curriculum-based dynamic assessment for new- or second-language learners with learning disabilities in secondary education settings. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 29(1), 69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barsalou, L. W. (1992). Cognitive psychology: An overview for cognitive scientists. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Beavers, K. F., Kratochwill, T. R., & Braden, J. P. (2004). Treatment utility of functional versus empiric assessment within consultation for reading problems. School Psychology Quarterly, 19(1), 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beck, A. T. (1976). Cognitive therapy and emotional disorders. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar

Beck, A. T. (1991). Cognitive therapy: A 30-year retrospective. American Psychologist, 46, 369–375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bednar, M. R., & Kletzien, S. B. (1990). Dynamic assessment for reading: A validation. Paper presented at the National Reading Conference, Miami, FL.

Bensoussan, Y. (2002). The effectiveness of mediation on three subtests of the Application of Cognitive Functions Scale, a dynamic assessment procedure for young children. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 466635.

Bentley, A. M. (1980). Pattern reproduction in two cultures. International Journal of Psychology, 15(1), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berman, J. (2001). An application of dynamic assessment to school mathematical learning. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of New England, Armidale (Australia).

Berman, J., & Graham, L. (2002). School counsellor use of curriculum-based dynamic assessment. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 12(1), 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berninger, V. (2004). Brain-based assessment and instructional intervention. In Reid, G. & Fawcett, A. (Eds.), Dyslexia in context. Research, policy, and practice (pp. 90–119). London and Philadelphia: Whur Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berninger, V. W., & Abbott, R. D. (1994). Redefining learning disabilities: Moving beyond aptitude-achievement discrepancies to failure to respond to validated treatment protocols. In Lyon, G. R. (Ed.), Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities: New views on measurement issues (pp. 162–182). Baltimore: P. H. Brooks.Google Scholar

Blachowicz, C. L. Z. (1999). Vocabulary in dynamic reading assessment: Two case studies. Reading Psychology, 20(3), 213–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blaufarb, H. A. (1962). A demonstration of verbal abstracting ability in chronic schizophrenics under enriched stimulus and instructional conditions. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 26, 471–475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bleuler, M. (1950). Dementia praecox or the group of schizophrenias (Trans. H. Zenkin). New York: International Universities Press. (Original work published 1911)Google Scholar

Bleuler, M. (1978). The schizophrenic disorders: Long-term patient and family studies (Trans. S. M. Clemens). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. (Original work published 1972)Google Scholar

Blewitt, P. (1994). Understanding categorical hierarchies: The earliest levels of skill. Child Development, 65, 1279–1298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bloom, B. S., & Broder, L. J. (1950). Problem-solving processes of college students. School Review and Elementary School Journal, 73, 1–103.Google Scholar

Bodrova, E., & Leong, D. J. (1996). Tools of the mind: The Vygotskian approach to early childhood education. Columbus, OH: Merrill.Google Scholar

Boring, E. G. (1950). History of experimental psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar

Borkowski, J. G., Chan, L. K. S., & Muthukrishna, N. (2000). A process-oriented model of metacognition: Links between motivation and executive functioning. In Impara, J. C. & Murphy, L. L. (Managing Ed.), Buros-Nebraska series on measurement and testing: Issues in the measurement of metacognition (pp. 1–41). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurement.Google Scholar

Borkowski, J. G., Turner, Lisa A., & Nicholson, J. (2004). Toward a research agenda on higher-level cognitive skills. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology [online], 4, 188–198. www.iacep.coged.org/journal (Retrieved August 12, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bortner, M., & Birch, H. G. (1969). Cognitive capacity and cognitive competence. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 74, 735–744.Google Scholar

Bouchard, T. J. Jr., & McGue, M. (1981). Familial studies of intelligence: A review. Science, 212, 1055–1059.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bransford, J. D., Delclos, V. R., Vye, N. J., Burns, M. S., & Hasselbring, T. S. (1986). Improving the quality of assessment and instruction: Roles of dynamic assessment (Technical Report No. 1, Alternative Assessments of Handicapped Children). Nashville, TN: Kennedy Center, Vanderbilt University.Google Scholar

Braun, C., Rennie, B. J., & Gordon, C. J. (1987). An examination of contexts for reading assessment. Journal of Educational Research, 89(5), 283–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bronson, M. B. (2000). Self-regulation in early childhood: Nature and nurture. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Brooks, N. D. (1997). An exploratory study into the cognitive modifiability of pre-school children using dynamic assessment. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Newcastle-Upon-Tyne; Newcastle, United Kingdom.

Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1986). Psychological theory and the study of learning disabilities. American Psychologist, 14(10), 1059–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brozo, W. G. (1990). Learning how at-risk readers learn best: A case for interactive assessment. Journal of Reading, 33(7), 522–527.Google Scholar

Budoff, M. (1967). Learning potential among institutionalized young adult retardates. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 72, 404–411.

Budoff, M. (1971). Learning potential and institutional discharge rates among adult EMRs. RIEPrint #33. Cambridge, MA: Research Institute for Educational Problems.Google Scholar

Budoff, M. (1987). The validity of learning potential assessment. In Lidz, C. S. (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 52–81). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Budoff, M., & Friedman, M. (1964). “Learning potential” as an assessment approach to the adolescent mentally retarded. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 28, 434–439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Burns, M. S. (1980). Preschool children's approach and performance on cognitive tasks. Unpublished master's thesis, George Peabody College of Vanderbilt University.

Burns, M. S. (1985). Comparison of “graduated prompt” and “mediational” dynamic assessment and static assessment with young children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.Google Scholar

Burns, M. S., Haywood, H. C., & Delclos, V. R. (1987). Young children's problem- solving strategies: An observational study. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 8, 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butler, K. G. (1997). Dynamic assessment at the millennium: A transient tutorial for today! Journal of Children's Communication Development, 19(1), 43–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Call, R. J. (1973). Verbal abstracting performance of low-SES children: An exploration of Jensen's theory of mental retardation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, George Peabody College.Google Scholar

Campbell, R., Donaldson, M., & Young, B. (1976). Constraints on classificatory skills in young children. British Journal of Psychology, 67(1), 80–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Campione, J. C., & Brown, A. L. (1985). Dynamic assessment: One approach and some initial data (Technical Report No. 361). Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Institute of Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED269735)Google Scholar

Campione, J. C., & Brown, A. L. (1987). Linking dynamic assessment with school achievement. In Lidz, C. S. (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 82–140). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Campione, J. C., & Brown, A. L. (1990). Guided learning and transfer: Implications for approaches to assessment. In Frederiksen, N., Glaser, R., Lesgold, A., & Shafto, M. G. (Eds.), Diagnostic monitoring of skill and knowledge acquisition (pp. 141–172). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Campione, J. C., Brown, A. L., & Ferrara, R. A. (1982). Mental retardation and intelligence. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of human intelligence (pp. 392–490). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Carlson, J. (1995, July). Models of intelligence: Implications for cognitive education. Presidential address, Fifth International Congress, International Association for Cognitive Education; Monticello, New York. Unpublished manuscript; Seattle, WA: University of Washington, College of Education.Google Scholar

Carlson, J. S., & Das, J. P. (1997). A process approach to remediating word decoding deficiencies in Chapter 1 children. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 20(2), 93–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carlson, J. S., & Wiedl, K. H. (1980). Applications of a dynamic testing approach in intelligence assessment: Empirical results and theoretical formulations. Zeitschrift für Differentiele und Diagnostische Psychologie, 1, 303–318.Google Scholar

Carlson, J. S., & Wiedl, K. H. (1992a). Principles of dynamic assessment: The application of a specific model. Learning and Individual Differences, 4(2), 153–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carlson, J. S., & Wiedl, K. H. (1992b). The dynamic assessment of intelligence. In Haywood, H. C. & Tzuriel, D. (Eds.), Interactive assessment (pp. 167–186). New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carney, J. J., & Cioffi, G. (1990). Extending traditional diagnosis: The dynamic assessment of reading abilities. Reading Psychology, 11(3), 177–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carney, J. J., & Cioffi, G. (1992). The dynamic assessment of reading abilities. International Journal of Disability, Development, and Education, 39(2), 107–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chaiklin, S. (2003). The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky's analysis of learning and instruction. In Kozulin, A., Gindis, B., Ageyev, V. S., & Miller, S. M. (Eds.), Vygotsky's educational theory in cultural context (pp. 39–63). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chan, W. Y., Ashman, A. F., & Van Kraayenoord, C. E. (2000). Science and biological classification: Linking dynamic assessment to classroom curriculum. In Lidz, C. S. & Elliott, J. G. (Eds.), Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 607–639). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar

Cherkes-Julkowski, M., & Gertner, N. (1989). Spontaneous cognitive processes in handicapped children. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Churches, M., Skuy, M., & Das, J. P. (2002). Identification and remediation of reading difficulties based on successive processing deficits and delays in general reading. Psychological Reports, 91 (3, Pt1), 813–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cioffi, G., & Carney, J. J. (1983). The dynamic assessment of reading disabilities. Reading Teacher, 36, 764–768.Google Scholar

Cohen, D. (2002). How the child's mind develops. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar

Cooper, L. A., & Regan, D. T. (1982). Attention, perception, and intelligence. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of human intelligence (pp. 123–169). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copple, C., Sigel, I. E., & Saunders, R. (1984). Educating the young thinker: Classroom strategies for cognitive growth. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Craig, H. K., & Evans, J. L. (1993). Pragmatics with SLI: Within-group variations in discourse behaviors. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 36, 777–789.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cronbach, L. J., & Furby, L. (1970). How we should measure change – or should we? Psychological Bulletin, 74, 68–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Das, J. P., Kar, B. C., & Parrila, R. K. (1996). Cognitive planning: The psychological basis of intelligent behavior. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Das, J. P., Mishra, R. K., & Pool, J. E. (1995). An experiment on cognitive remediation of word-reading difficulty. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 66–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Das, J. P., & Naglieri, J. A. (1997). Das/Naglieri: Cognitive Assessment System. Itasca, IL: Riverside.Google Scholar

Das, J. P., Naglieri, J. A., & Kirby, J. R. (1994). Assessment of cognitive processes: The PASS theory of intelligence. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar

Delclos, V. R., Burns, M. S., & Vye, N. J. (1993). A comparison of teachers' responses to dynamic and traditional assessment reports. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 11(1), 46–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Delclos, V. R., Vye, N. J., Burns, M. S., Bransford, J. D., & Hasslebring, T. S. (1992). In Haywood, H. C. & Tzuriel, D. (Eds.), Interactive assessment (pp. 317–331). New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Delclos, V. R., Vye, N. J., Johnson, R. T., & Bransford, J. D. (1987). Effects of dynamic assessment feedback on teacher instruction (Technical Report No. 12, Alternative Assessments of Handicapped Children). Nashville, TN: Kennedy Center, Vanderbilt University.Google Scholar

DeLoache, J. S. (1991). Symbolic functioning in very young children: Understanding of pictures and models. Child Development, 62, 736–752.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

DeLoache, J. S. (1995). Early understanding and use of symbols: The Model model. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 109–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Desoete, A., Roeyers, H., Buysse, A., & De Clercq, A. (2002). Dynamic assessment of metacognitive skills in young children with mathematics learning disabilities. In Aaslsvoort, G. M., Resing, W. C. M., & Ruijssenaars, A. J. J. M. (Eds.), Learning potential assessment and cognitive training: Actual research and perspectives in theory building and methodology (pp. 307–333). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar

Deutsch, R. (2003). Mediation from the perspective of mediated learning experience. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 3, 29–45. Retrieved from www.iacep.coged.org/journal October 14, 2004.Google Scholar

Dodge, D. T., & Colker, L. J. (1992). The creative curriculum for early childhood (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Teaching Strategies.Google Scholar

Drahozal, E. (1997). Validity Information for the Iowa Tests of Basic Skills (ITBS) and Iowa Tests of Educational Development (ITED). Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing Co.Google Scholar

Ehrlenmeyer-Kimling, L., & Jarvik, L. F. (1963). Genetics and intelligence: A review. Science, 142, 1477–1479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eisenberg, N., & Harris, J. D. (1984). Social competence: A developmental perspective. School Psychology Review, 13(3), 267–277.Google Scholar

Elder, J. H., & Goodman, J. J. (1996). Social turn-taking of children with neuropsychiatric impairments and their parents. Issues in Comprehensive Pediatric Nursing, 19(4), 249–262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Elliott, J. (1993). Assisted assessment: If it is “dynamic” why is it so rarely employed? Educational and Child Psychology, 10(4), 48–58.Google Scholar

Elliott, J. G. (2000). Dynamic assessment in educational contexts: Purpose and promise. In Lidz, C. S. & Elliott, J. G. (Eds.), Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 713–740). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar

Elliott, J. (2003). Dynamic assessment in educational settings: Realising potential. Educational Review, 55(1), 15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elrod, G. F., & Tesolowski, D. G. (1993). Best practices in the vocational assessment of special needs learners. In Vance, H. B. (Ed.), Best practices in assessment for school and clinical settings (pp. 69–111). Brandon, VT: Clinical Psychology Publishing.Google Scholar

Embretson, S. E. (1987). Toward development of a psychometric approach. In Lidz, C. S. (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 141–170). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Estes, W. K. (1982). Learning, memory, and intelligence. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of human intelligence (pp. 170–224). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Feather, N. T. (1961). The relationship of persistence at a task to expectation of success and achievement related motives. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63(3), 552–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fenichel, O. (1946). The psychoanalytic theory of neurosis. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner.Google Scholar

Fenwick, T. J., & Parsons, J. (1999). Using dynamic assessment in the social studies classroom. Canadian Social Studies, 34(1), 153–155.Google Scholar

Feuerstein, R., Feuerstein, R. S., Falik, L., & Rand, Y. (2002). The dynamic assessment of cognitive modifiability. Jerusalem: ICELP Press.Google Scholar

Feuerstein, R., Haywood, H. C., Rand, Y., Hoffman, M. B., & Jensen, M. (1982/1986). Examiner manual for the Learning Potential Assessment Device. Jerusalem: Hadassah-WIZO-Canada Research Institute and International Center for the Enhancement of Learning Potential.Google Scholar

Feuerstein, R., Jeannet, M., & Richelle, M. (1953). Quelques observations du développement intellectuel chez les jeunes juifs nord-africains [Some observations on intellectual development in North African Jewish youth]. Unpublished manuscript, Jerusalem: Hadassah-WIZO-Canada Research Institute and International Centre for the Enhancement of Learning Potential.Google Scholar

Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., & Hoffman, M. B. (1979). Dynamic assessment of retarded performers: The Learning Potential Assessment Device, theory, instruments, and techniques. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.Google Scholar

Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., Hoffman, M. B., & Miller, R. (1980). Instrumental enrichment. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.Google Scholar

Feuerstein, R. F., & Richelle, M. (1954). Enfants juifs nord-africains [North African Jewish children]. Tel Aviv: The Jewish Agency.Google Scholar

Flavell, J. H. (1985). Cognitive development (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Flavell, J. H., Miller, P. H., & Miller, S. A. (1993). Cognitive development (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Frye, D., Zelazo, P. D., & Palfai, T. (1995). Theory of mind and rule-based reasoning. Cognitive Development, 10, 483–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1986a). Effects of systematic formative evaluation on student achievement: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 53, 199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1986b). Curriculum-based assessment of progress toward long-term and short-term goals. Journal of Special Education, 20, 69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fuchs, L. S., & Deno, S. L. (1994). Must instructionally useful performance assessment be based in the curriculum? Exceptional Children, 61, 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1996). Combining performance assessment and curriculum-based measurement to strengthen instructional planning. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 11, 183–192.Google Scholar

Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2002). Curriculum-based measurement: Describing competence, enhancing outcomes, evaluating treatment effects, and identifying treatment nonresponders. Peabody Journal of Education, 77(2), 64–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fuchs, L., Fuchs D., Eaton, S., & Hamlett, C. (2003). Dynamic assessment of test accommodations. Austin, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar

Fuchs, D., Mock, D., Morgan, P. L., & Young, C. L. (2003). Responsiveness-to-intervention: Definitions, evidence, and implications for the learning disabilities construct. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18, 157–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gelman, S. A. (1998). Categories in young children's thinking. Young Children, 53(1), 20–26.Google Scholar

Gelman, S. A., & Coley, J. D. (1990). The importance of knowing a Dodo is a bird: Categories and inferences in 2-year-old children. Developmental Psychology, 26(5), 796–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerard, C. (1975, September–December). Developmental study of categorical classifications. Enfance, nos. 3–4, 345–372.Google Scholar

Gerber, M. M. (2000). Dynamic assessment for students with learning disabilities: Lessons in theory and design. In Lidz, C. S. & Elliott, J. G. (Eds.), Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 263–292). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar

Gerber, M., Semmel, D., & Semmel, M. (1994). Computer-based dynamic assessment of multidigit multiplication. Exceptional Children, 61(2), 114–125.Google Scholar

Gettinger, M. (1984). Measuring time needed for learning to predict learning outcomes. Exceptional Children, 51(3), 244–248.Google ScholarPubMed

Gilliam, J. E., Carpenter, B. O., & Christensen, J. R. (1996). Gifted and Talented Evaluation Scales: Examiner's manual. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar

Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar

Goleman, D. (1998). Working with emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar

Goncu, A., & Rogoff, B. (1998). Children's categorization with varying adult support. American Research Journal, 35(2), 333–349.Google Scholar

Gordon, J. E., & Haywood, H. C. (1969). Input deficit in cultural-familial retardates: Effect of stimulus enrichment. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 73, 604–610.Google ScholarPubMed

Goswami, U. (1998). Cognition in children. East Sussex, England: Psychology Press/Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar

Greenberg, K. H. (2000a). Inside professional practice: A collaborative, systems orientation to linking dynamic assessment and intervention. In Lidz, C. S. & Elliott, J. (Eds.), Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 489–312). Amsterdam: JAI/Elsevier Science.Google Scholar

Greenberg, K. H. (2000b). Attending to hidden needs: The cognitive enrichment advantage perspective. Educational and Child Psychology: Psychological Influences upon Educational Intervention, 17(3), 51–69.Google Scholar

Greenberg, K. H., & Williams, L. (2002). Reciprocity and mutuality in dynamic assessment: Asking uncomfortable questions. In Aaslsvoort, G. M., Resing, W. C. M., & Ruijssenaars, A. J. J. M. (Eds.), Learning potential assessment and cognitive training: Actual research and perspectives in theory building and methodology (pp. 91–110). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar

Greenspan, S. I., Nover, R. A., & Scheuer, A. Q. (1987). A developmental diagnostic approach for infants, young children, and their families. Clinical Infant Reports, no. 3, 499–535.Google Scholar

Guterman, E. (2002). Toward dynamic assessment of reading: Applying metacognitive awareness guidance to reading assessment tasks. Journal of Research in Reading, 25(3), 283–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guthke, J. (1982). The learning test concept: An alternative to the traditional static intelligence test. German Journal of Psychology, 6(4), 306–324.Google Scholar

Guthke, J. (1985). Ein neuer Ansatz für die rehabilitations-psychologisch orientierte Psychodiagnostik: das Lerntestkonzept als Alternative zum herkommlichen Intelligenztest [A new approach to rehabilitation-oriented psychodiagnosis: The learning test concept as an alternative to the traditional intelligence test.] In Wiedl, K. H. (Ed.), Rehabilitations-psychologie [Rehabilitation psychology]. Mainz, Germany: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar

Guthke, J. (1992). Learning tests: The concept, main research findings, problems, and trends. In Carlson, J. S. (Ed.), Advances in cognition and educational practice (Vol. 1A, pp. 213–233). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar

Guthke, J., & Loffler, M. (1983). A diagnostic program (learning test) for the differential assessment of school failure in 1st grade pupils. In Rosler, H. D., Das, J. P., & Wald, I. (Eds.), Mental and language retardation (pp. 41–50). Berlin: Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar

Guthke, J., & Wingenfeld, S. (1992). The learning test concept: Origins, state of the art, and trends. In Haywood, H. C. & Tzuriel, D. (Eds.), Interactive assessment (pp. 64–93). New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guthrie, E. R. (1952). The psychology of learning (rev. ed.). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Gutierrez-Clellen, V. F., & Peña, E. (2001). Dynamic assessment of diverse children: A tutorial. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 32(4), 212–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haeussermann, E. (1958). Developmental potential of preschool children. New York: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar

Halpin, V. G. (1958). The performance of mentally retarded children on the Weigl Goldstein-Scheerer Color Form Sorting Test. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 62(5), 916–919.Google ScholarPubMed

Halstead, W. C. (1947). Brain and intelligence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Hamers, J., Pennings, A., & Guthke, J. (1994). Training-based assessment of school achievement. Learning and Instruction, 4, 347–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hamers, J. H. M., Sijtsma, K., & Ruijssenaars, A. J. J. M. (Eds.). (1993). Learning potential assessment: Theoretical, methodological, and practical issues. Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar

Hamlin, R. M., Haywood, H. C., & Folsom, A. T. (1965). Effect of enriched input on schizophrenic abstraction. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 70, 390–394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hansen, A. (2003). On mediation from Magne Nyborg's perspective. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 3, 54–70. Retrieved from www.iacep.coged.org/journal October 14, 2004.Google Scholar

Harlow, H. F. (1949). The formation of learning sets. Psychological Review, 56, 51–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Harvard Graduate School of Education, Educational Technology Center. (1995). Assessing mathematical understanding and skills effectively: An interim report of the Harvard Group Balanced Assessment in Mathematics Project. Cambridge, MA: Educational Technology Center.

Hays, D. R. III (2001). Use of information from dynamic assessment of vocational aptitudes of persons with mental retardation by vocational rehabilitation counselors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation proposal, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.Google Scholar

Haywood, H. C. (1967). Experiential factors in intellectual development: The concept of dynamic intelligence. In Zubin, J. & Jervis, G. A. (Eds.), Psychopathology of mental development (pp. 69–104). New York: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar

Haywood, H. C. (1968a). Introduction to clinical neuropsychology. In Haywood, H. C. (Ed.), Brain damage in school age children (pp. 3–19). Washington, DC: Council for Exceptional Children.Google Scholar

Haywood, H. C. (1968b). Motivational orientation of overachieving and underachieving elementary school children. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 72, 662–667.Google Scholar

Haywood, H. C. (1971). Individual differences in motivational orientation: A trait approach. In Day, H. I., Berlyne, D. E., & Hunt, D. E. (Eds.), Intrinsic motivation: A new direction in education (pp. 113–127). Toronto: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar

Haywood, H. C. (1977). Alternatives to normative assessment. In Mittler, P. (Ed.), Research to practice in mental retardation: Proceedings of the 4th Congress of IASSMD. Vol. 2, Education and training (pp. 11–18). Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar

Haywood, H. C. (1986). Test of Verbal Abstracting. In Feuerstein, R., Haywood, H. C., Rand, Y., Hoffman, M. B., & Jensen, M., Examiner manual, Learning Potential Assessment Device. Jerusalem: Hadassah-WIZO-Canada Research Institute.Google Scholar

Haywood, H. C. (1987/1993). A mediational teaching style. The Thinking Teacher, 4(1), 1–6. Also published in International Journal of Cognitive Education and Mediated Learning, 3(1), 27–38.Google Scholar

Haywood, H. C. (1988). Bridging: A special technique of mediation. The Thinking Teacher, 4(2), 4–5.Google Scholar

Haywood, H. C. (1992a). The strange and wonderful symbiosis of motivation and cognition. International Journal of Cognitive Education and Mediated Learning, 2(3), 186–197.Google Scholar

Haywood, H. C. (1992b). Interactive assessment: A special issue. Journal of Special Education, 26, 233–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haywood, H. C. (1997). Interactive assessment. In Taylor, R. L. (Ed.), Assessment of individuals with mental retardation (pp. 103–129). San Diego, CA: Singular.Google Scholar

Haywood, H. C. (2000). Cognitive developmental psychotherapy: Overview. In Kozulin, A., Rand, Y., & Feuerstein, R. (Eds.), Experience of mediated learning: An impact of Feuerstein's theory in education and psychology (pp. 292–308). London: Pergamon.Google Scholar

Haywood, H. C. (2002, December). New concepts of intelligence are needed: New methods of assessment will be required. Paper given at the Vanderbilt Conference on the Futures of Assessment, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.Google Scholar

Haywood, H. C. (2003a). Mediation within a neo-Piagetian framework. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 3, 71–81. Retrieved from www.iacep.coged.org/journal October 14, 2004.Google Scholar

Haywood, H. C. (2003b, November). A transactional perspective on intellectual disability. Keynote address, Australian Society for the Study of Intellectual Disability, Brisbane.

Haywood, H. C. (2004a). Thinking in, around, and about the curriculum: The role of cognitive education. International Journal of Disability, Development, and Education, 51, 231–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haywood, H. C. (2004b). Theoretical bases of cognitive education: Old and new perspectives. Cognitive Education in South Africa, 11(2), 3–8. (Video presentation, International Association for Cognitive Education and Psychology-Southern Africa. Cape Town, South Africa, November 2004). DVD available from author.Google Scholar

Haywood, H. C. (2005, July). Group dynamic assessment with adults with traumatic brain injuries: Massed versus distributed mediation. Paper given at the 10th international conference, International Association for Cognitive Education and Psychology, Durham, UK.

Haywood, H. C. (2006). A transactional perspective on mental retardation. International Review of Research in Mental Retardation, 31, 289–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haywood, H. C., & Bransford, J. D. (1984, April). Dynamic versus static assessment of young handicapped children. Presented at Annual Conference on Psychological Theory and Research in Mental Retardation, Gatlinburg, TN.

Haywood, H. C., Brooks, P. H., & Burns, M. S. (1992). Bright start: Cognitive curriculum for young children. Watertown, MA: Charlesbridge.Google Scholar

Haywood, H. C., & Burke, W. P. (1977). Development of individual differences in intrinsic motivation. In Uzgiris, I. C. & Weizman, F. (Eds.), The structuring of experience (pp. 235–263). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haywood, H. C., Filler, J. W., Jr., Shifman, M. A., & Chatelanat, G. (1975). Behavioral assessment in mental retardation. In McReynolds, P. (Ed.), Advances in psychological assessment (Vol. 3, pp. 96–136). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Haywood, H. C., & Lidz, C. S. (2005). International survey of dynamic assessment trainers. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 5(2), 181–198. Retrieved from www.iacep.coged.orgJanuary 5, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haywood, H. C., & Menal, C. (1992). Cognitive developmental psychotherapy: A case study. International Journal of Cognitive Education and Mediated Learning, 2(1), 43–54 [Version française, pp. 55–66].Google Scholar

Haywood, H. C., & Miller, M. B. (2003). Group dynamic assessment of adults with traumatic brain injuries. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 3, 37–163. Retrieved from www.iacep.coged.org/journal, November 25, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haywood, H. C., & Miller, M. B. (2005, July). Group dynamic assessment with adults with traumatic brain injuries: Massed versus distributed mediation. Paper given at the 10th international conference, International Association for Cognitive Education and Psychology, Durham, UK.

Haywood, H. C., & Moelis, I. (1963). Effect of symptom change on intellectual function in schizophrenia. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 76–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haywood, H. C., & Paour, J.-L. (1992). Alfred Binet (1857–1911): Multifaceted pioneer. Psychology, Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 18(1), 1–4.Google Scholar

Haywood, H. C., & Switzky, H. N. (1974). Children's verbal abstracting: Effects of enriched input, age, and IQ. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 78, 556.Google ScholarPubMed

Haywood, H. C., & Switzky, H. N. (1986). Intrinsic motivation and behavior effectiveness in retarded persons. International Review of Research in Mental Retardation, 14, 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haywood, H. C., & Switzky, H. N. (1992). Ability and modifiability: What, how, and how much? In Carlson, J. S. (Ed.), Cognition and educational practice: An international perspective (pp. 25–85). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

Haywood, H. C., & Tapp, J. T. (1966). Experience and the development of adaptive behavior. In Ellis, N. R. (Ed.), International review of research in mental retardation (Vol. 1, pp. 109–151). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Haywood, H. C., & Tzuriel, D. (Eds.). (1992). Interactive assessment. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haywood, H. C., & Tzuriel, D. (2002). Applications and challenges in dynamic assessment. Peabody Journal of Education, 77(2), 40–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haywood, H. C., Tzuriel, D., & Vaught, S. (1992). Psychoeducational assessment from a transactional perspective. In Haywood, H. C. & Tzuriel, D. (Eds.), Interactive assessment (pp. 38–63). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haywood, H. C., & Wachs, T. D. (1966). Size-discrimination learning as a function of motivation-hygiene orientation in adolescents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 57, 279–286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Haywood, H. C., & Wachs, T. D. (1981). Intelligence, cognition, and individual differences. In Begab, M. J., Haywood, H. C., & Garber, H. (Eds.), Psychosocial influences in retarded performance. Vol. 1, Issues and theories in development (pp. 95–126). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.Google Scholar

Haywood, H. C., & Weaver, S. J. (1967). Differential effects of motivational orientation and incentive conditions on motor performance in institutionalized retardates. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 72, 459–467.Google Scholar

Heald, J. D., & Marzolf, S. S. (1953). Abstract behavior in elementary school children as measured by the Goldstein-Scheerer Stick Test and the Weigl-Goldstein-Scheerer Color Form Sorting Test. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 9(1), 59–62.3.0.CO;2-F>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hebb, D. O. (1949). The organization of behavior. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Heimburger, R. F., & Reitan, R. M. (1961). Easily administered written test for lateralizing brain lesions. Journal of Neurosurgery, 18, 301–312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Heinrich, J. J. (1991). Responsiveness of adults with severe head injury to mediated learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.

Hessels, M. G. P. (2000). The Learning Potential Test for Ethnic Minorities (LEM): A tool for standardized assessment of children in kindergarten and the first years of primary school. In Lidz, C. S. & Elliott, J. G. (Eds.), Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 109–131). Amsterdam: JAI/Elsevier Science.Google Scholar

Hickling, A. K., & Wellman, H. M. (2000). The emergence of children's causal explanations and theories: Evidence from everyday conversation. Developmental Psychology, 37(5), 668–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirsch, E. D. Jr., & Holdren, J. (Eds.). (1996). What your kindergartner needs to know. Charlottesville, VA: Core Knowledge Foundation.Google Scholar

Hoover, H. D., Hieronymus, A. N., Frisbie, D. A., & Dunbar, S. B. (1993). Iowa Tests of Basic Skills (ITBS) and Iowa Tests of Educational Development (ITED). Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.Google Scholar

Hudson, J., & Fivush, R. (1991, April). Planning in the preschool years. The emergence of plans from general event knowledge. Paper presented in G. Sansone & C. Berg (Chairs). New directions in the development of planning: Cognitive, social and motivational components. Symposium presented at the meetings of the Society for Research in Child Development, Seattle.

Hunt, J. McV. (1961). Intelligence and experience. New York: Ronald.Google ScholarPubMed

Hunt, J. McV. (1963). Motivation inherent in information processing and action. In Harvey, O. J. (Ed.), Motivation and social interaction (pp. 35–94). New York: Ronald.Google Scholar

Hunt, J. McV., & Cofer, C. N. (1944). Psychological deficit. In Hunt, J. McV (Ed.), Personality and the behavior disorders (pp. 971–1032). New York: Ronald Press.Google Scholar

Hupp, S. C., & Abbeduto, L. (1991). Persistence as an indicator of mastery motivation in young children with cognitive delays. Journal of Early Intervention, 15(3), 219–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacobs, E. L. (2001). The effects of adding dynamic assessment components to a computerized preschool language screening test. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 22(4), 217–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jensen, A. R. (1980). Bias in mental testing. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Jensen, A. R. (1991). General mental ability: From psychometrics to biology. Diagnostique, 16, 134–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar

Jensen, A. R. (2000). Psychometric skepticism. Psycoloquy, 11, #39. Retrieved from psycprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/archive/00000039 January 19, 2005.Google Scholar

Jensen, E. (1998). Teaching with the brain in mind. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar

Jepsen, R. H., & Lidz, C. S. (2000). Group dynamic assessment procedure: Reliability and validity of a cognitive assessment procedure with adolescents with developmental disabilities. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 1(1). Online journal of the International Association of Cognitive Education and Psychology, www.iacep.coged.org.Google Scholar

Jitendra, A. K., & Kameenui, E. J. (1993). An exploratory study of dynamic assessment involving two instructional strategies on experts and novices' performance in solving part-whole mathematical word problems. Diagnostique, 18, 305–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jitendra, A. K., & Kameenui, E. J. (1996). Experts and novices' error patterns in solving part-whole mathematical word problems: The role of dynamic assessment and instructional strategies. Unpublished manuscript, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA.CrossRef

Jitendra, A. K., & Rohena-Diaz, E. (1996). Language assessment of students who are linguistically diverse: Why a discrete approach is not the answer. School Psychology Review, 25, 40–56.Google Scholar

Jitendra, A. K., Rohena-Diaz, E., & Nolet, V. (1998). A dynamic curriculum-based language assessment: Planning instruction for special needs students who are linguistically diverse. Preventing School Failure, 42(4), 182–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, K., Haywood, H. C., & Hays, D. R. (1992, February). Effects of failure within the test on subsequent subtest performance. Paper presented at the Third International Conference of the International Association for Cognitive Education, Riverside, CA.

Kahn, R. (2000). Dynamic assessment of infants and toddlers. In Lidz, C. S. & Elliott, J. G. (Eds.), Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 229–262). Amsterdam: JAI/Elsevier Science.Google Scholar

Kaniel, S., & Tzuriel, D. (1992). Mediated learning experience approach in the assessment and treatment of borderline psychotic adolescents. In Haywood, H. C. & Tzuriel, D. (Eds.), Interactive assessment (pp. 399–418). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karnes, M. B., Johnson, L. J., & Beauchamp, K. D. F. (1989). Developing problem-solving skills to enhance task persistence of handicapped preschool children. Journal of Early Intervention, 13(1), 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karpov, Y. V. (1982). Kriterii I metody diagnostiki umstvennogo razvitiya [Criteria and methods for the assessment of mental development]. Vestn.MGU: Psikhologia, 3, 18–26.Google Scholar

Karpov, Y. V. (2003a). Vygotsky's doctrine of scientific concepts. In Kozulin, A., Gindis, B., Ageyev, V. S., & Miller, S. M. (Eds.), Vygotsky's educational theory in cultural context (pp. 65–82). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karpov, Y. (2003b). Vygotsky's concept of mediation. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 3, 46–53. Retrieved from www.iacep.coged.org/journal, December 4, 2003.Google Scholar

Karpov, Y. (2005). The neo-Vygotskian approach to child development. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karpov, Y., & Haywood, H. C. (1998). Two ways to elaborate Vygotsky's concept of mediation: Implications for education. American Psychologist, 53(1), 27–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (1983). K-ABC: Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar

Keane, K. J., Tannenbaum, A. J., & Krapf, G. F. (1992). Cognitive competence: Reality and potential in the deaf. In Haywood, H. C. & Tzuriel, D. (Eds.), Interactive assessment (pp. 300–316). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klahr, D., & Robinson, M. (1981). Formal assessment of problem-solving and planning processes in preschool children. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 113–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kletzien, S. B., & Bednar, M. R. (1990). Dynamic assessment for at-risk readers. Journal of Reading, 33(7), 528–533.Google Scholar

Kopp, C. B. (1992). Emotional distress and control in young children. In Eisenberg, N. & Fabes, R. A. (Eds.), Emotion and its regulation in early development (pp. 41–56). New Directions for Child Development, no. 55. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Korstvedt, A., Stacey, C. L., & Reynolds, W. F. (1954). Concept formation of normal and subnormal adolescents on a modification of the Weigl-Goldstein-Scheerer Color Form Sorting Test. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 10(1), 88–90.3.0.CO;2-M>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kovaleski, J. (2004). Response to instruction in the identification of learning disabilities: A guide for school teams. NASP Communiqué, 32, No. 5.Google Scholar

Kozulin, S., & Garb, E. (2002). Dynamic assessment of EFL text comprehension. School Psychology International, 23(1), 112–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kraepelin, E. (1919). Dementia praecox. New York: Churchill Livingstone, Inc. (Trans. E. Barclay & S. Barclay, published 1971).Google Scholar

Kragler, A. (1989). Dynamic versus static assessment; A comparison of the effects of each on the reading placement levels of Chapter 1 students. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED327898)

Kroesbergen, E. H., VanLuit, J. E. H., & Naglieri, J. A. (2003). Mathematical learning difficulties and PASS cognitive processes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36(6), 574–582.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

L'Abate, L. (1968). Screening children with cerebral dysfunction through the laboratory method. In Haywood, H. C. (Ed.), Brain damage in school age children (pp. 128–158). Washington, DC: Council for Exceptional Children.Google Scholar

Lahey, M. (1988). Language disorders and language development. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Laing, S. P., & Kamhi, A. (2003). Alternative assessment of language and literacy in culturally and linguistically diverse populations. Language, Speech, & Hearing Services in Schools, 34(1), 44–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Largotta, D. (2001). Comparison of four year old children's retelling of stories in three conditions of increasing abstractness. Unpublished master's thesis, Touro College, New York, NY.Google Scholar

Lee, M., Vaughn, B. E., & Kopp, C. B. (1983). Role of self-control in the performance of very young children on a delayed-response memory-for-location task. Developmental Psychology, 19(1), 40–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levy, C. (1999). The discriminant validity of the Application of Cognitive Functions Scale (ACFS): A performance comparison between typically developing and special needs preschool children. Unpublished master's thesis, Touro College, New York, NY.Google Scholar

Lidz, C. S. (Ed.). (1987). Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach for evaluating learning potential. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Lidz, C. S. (1991). Practitioner's guide to dynamic assessment. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Lidz, C. S. (1992). Extent of incorporation of dynamic assessment in cognitive assessment courses: A national survey of school psychology trainers. Journal of Special Education, 26, 325–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lidz, C. S. (2000). The Application of Cognitive Functions Scale (ACFS): An example of curriculum-based dynamic assessment. In Lidz, C. S. & Elliott, J. G. (Eds.), Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 407–439). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar

Lidz, C. S. (2001). Multicultural issues and dynamic assessment. In Suzuki, L. A., Ponterotto, J. G., & Meller, P. J. (Eds.), Handbook of multicultural assessment: Clinical, psychological, and educational applications (2nd ed., pp. 523–539). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Lidz, C. S. (2003). Early childhood assessment. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Lidz, C. S. (2004). Successful application of a dynamic assessment procedure with deaf students between the ages of four and eight years. Educational and Child Psychology, 21(1), 59–73.Google Scholar

Lidz, C. S., & Elliott, J. G. (Eds.). (2000). Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications. Amsterdam: JAI/Elsevier Science.Google Scholar

Lipman, M. (1991). Thinking in education. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lidz, C. S., & Greenberg, K. H. (1997). Criterion validity of a group dynamic assessment procedure with rural first grade regular education students. Journal of Cognitive Education, 6(2), 89–99.Google Scholar

Lidz, C. S., Jepsen, R. H., & Miller, M. B. (1997). Relationships between cognitive processes and academic achievement: Application of a group dynamic assessment procedure with multiply handicapped students. Educational and Child Psychology, 14(4), 56–67.Google Scholar

Lidz, C. S., & Macrine, S. L. (2001). An alternative approach to the identification of gifted culturally and linguistically diverse learners. School Psychology International, 22(1), 74–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lidz, C. S., & Aalsvoort, G. M. (2005). Usefulness of the Application of Cognitive Functions Scale with young children from The Netherlands. Transylvanian Journal of Psychology [special issue on dynamic assessment; Guest Ed., J. Lebeer] 1, 82–99.Google Scholar

Lillard, A., & Curenton, S. (1999). Do young children understand what others feel, want, and know? Young Children, 54(5), 52–57.Google Scholar

Lipman, M. (1991). Thinking in education. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lipman, M., Sharp, A. M., & Oscanyan, F. S. (1980). Philosophy in the classroom. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Lubinski, D., & Dawis, R. W. (1992). Aptitudes, skills, and proficiencies. In Dunnette, M. D. & Hough, L. M. (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 3, 2nd ed., pp. 1–59). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar

Luria, A. R. (1966). Human brain and psychological processes (Trans. B. Haigh). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Luria, A. R. (1973). The working brain: An introduction to neuropsychology (Trans B. Haigh). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Luria, A. R. (1979). The making of mind: A personal account of Soviet psychology (Eds. Michael Cole & Sheila Cole). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Luria, A. R. (1980). Higher cortical functions in man (2nd ed., Trans. B. Haigh). New York: Basic Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lyon, G. R., Fletcher, J. M., Shaywitz, S. E., Shaywitz, B. A., Torgesen, J. K., Wood, F. B.. (2001). Rethinking learning disabilities. Washington, DC: Thomas Fordham Foundation. Retrieved January 19, 2005 from www.edexcellence.net/library/special_ed/index.htmlGoogle Scholar

Machleit, S. R. (2000). Working memory and writing: A comparison of two types of dynamic assessment of working memory and the relationship to sorting ability of heterogeneously grouped seventh grade students. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 61(2-A), 496.Google Scholar

Malowitsky, M. (2001). Investigation of the effectiveness of the mediation portion of two subscales of the Application of Cognitive Functions Scale, a dynamic assessment procedure for young children. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 457191; Clearinghouse identifier: TM033288)

Marzano, R. J., Brandt, R. S., Hughes, C. S., Jones, B. F., Presseisen, B. Z., Rankin, S. C., & Suhor, C. (1988). Dimensions of thinking: A framework for curriculum and instruction. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar

Mason, J. M. (Ed.). (1989). Reading and writing connections. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar

McFarlin, D. B. (1985). Persistence in the face of failure: The impact of self-esteem and contingency of information. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 11(2), 153–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meehl, P. E. (1954). Clinical versus statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and a review of the evidence. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meichenbaum, D. (1977). Cognitive–behavior modification: An integrative approach. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meichenbaum, D. (1982). Teaching thinking: A cognitive–behavioral approach. Austin, TX: Society for Learning Disabilities and Remedial Education.Google Scholar

Meltzer, L. J. (1987). The Surveys of Problem-Solving and Educational Skills (SPES). Cambridge, MA: Educator's Publishing Service.Google Scholar

Meltzer, L. J. (1992). Strategy use in students with learning disabilities: The challenge of assessment. In Melzter, L. (Ed.), Strategy assessment and instruction of students with learning disabilities: From theory to practice (pp. 93–135). San Antonio, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar

Meltzer, L., & Reid, D. K. (1994). New directions in the assessment of students with special needs: The shift toward a constructivist perspective. Journal of Special Education, 28(3), 335–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Messick, S. J. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons' responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50(9), 741–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, G. (1999). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. In Sternberg, R. J. & Wagner, R. K. (Eds.), Readings in cognitive psychology (pp. 2–18). Ft. Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College.Google Scholar

Minick, N. (1987). Implications of Vygotsky's theories for dynamic assessment. In Lidz, C. S. (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 116–140). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Minnaert, A. (2002). Alternative assessment of students' domain-specific learning competencies in the transition of secondary to higher education. In Aaslsvoort, G. M., Resing, W. C. M., & Ruijssenaars, A. J. J. M. (Eds.), Learning potential assessment and cognitive training: Actual research and perspectives in theory building and methodology (pp. 335–351). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar

Naglieri, J. A. (1997). Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test: Multilevel technical manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar

Naglieri, J. A., & Gottling, S. H. (1997). The PASS theory and mathematics instruction: A summary of initial studies. Journal of Cognitive Education, 5, 209–215.Google Scholar

Naglieri, J. A., & Johnson, D. (2000). Effectiveness of a cognitive strategy intervention in improving arithmetic computation based upon the PASS theory. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(6), 591–597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nguyen, S. P., & Murphy, G. L. (2003). An apple is more than just a fruit: Cross-classification in children's concepts. Child Development, 74(6), 1783–1806.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nigam, R. (2001). Dynamic assessment of graphic symbol combinations by children with autism. Focus on Autism & Other Developmental Disabilities, 16(3), 190–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olswang, L. B., Bain, B. A., & Johnson, G. A. (1992). Using dynamic assessment with children with language disorders. In Warren, S. F. & Reichle, J. E. (Eds.), Causes and effects in communication and language intervention (pp. 187–215). Baltimore: P. H. Brookes.Google Scholar

Osterrieth, P. A. (1944). Le Test de Copie d'Une Figure Complex : Contribution à l'étude de la perception et de la mémoire [The Complex Figure Test: Contribution to the study of perception and memory]. Éditions des Archives de Psychologie. Neuchâtel, Switzerland: Delachaux & Niestlé.

Otto, S. P. (2001). Intelligence, genetics of: Heritability and causation. International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences (pp. 7651–7658). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Owings, S., & Siefker, J. M. (1991). Criterion-referenced scoring versus norming: A critical discussion. Vocational Evaluation and Work Adjustment Bulletin, 24(3), 109–111.Google Scholar

Palinscar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Palisin, H. (1986). Preschool temperament and performance on achievement tests. Developmental Psychology, 22, 766–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paour, J.-L. (1988). Retard mental et aides cognitives [Mental retardation and cognitive aides]. In Caverni, J.-P., Bastien, C., Mendelsohn, P., & Tiberghien, G. (Eds.), Psychologie cognitive: modèles et méthodes [Models and methods in cognitive psychology] (pp. 191–216). Grenoble, France: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.Google Scholar

Parrila, R. K., Kendrick, M. E., Papapoulis, T. C., & Kirby, J. R. (1999). Efficacy of a cognitive reading remediation program for at-risk children in grade 1. Developmental Disabilities Bulletin, 27(2), 1–31.Google Scholar

Peña, E. (2000). Measurement of modifiability in children from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 2(2), 87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peña, E. (2001). Assessment of semantic knowledge: Use of feedback and clinical interviewing. Seminars in Speech and Language, 22, 51–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Peña, E. D., & Gillam, R. B. (2000). Dynamic assessment of children referred for speech and language evaluations. In Lidz, C. S. & Elliott, J. G. (Eds.), Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 543–575). Amsterdam: JAI Elsevier Science.Google Scholar

Peña, E., Iglesias, A., & Lidz, C. S. (2001). Reducing test bias through dynamic assessment of children's word learning ability. American Journal of Speech Language Pathology, 10, 138–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peña, E., Miller, L., & Gillam, R. (1999). Dynamic assessment of narratives in children from diverse backgrounds. California Speech-Language-Hearing Association Magazine, 28(2), 12–13, 18.Google Scholar

Peña, E., Quinn, R., & Iglesias, A. (1992). Application of dynamic methods of language assessment: A nonbiased approach. Journal of Special Education, 26, 269–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peña, E., & Valles, L. (1995). Language assessment and instructional programming for linguistically different learners: Proactive classroom processes. In Kayser, H. (Ed.), Bilingual speech-language pathology: An hispanic focus (pp. 129–152). San Diego, CA: Singular.Google Scholar

Peña, L. (1993). Dynamic assessment: A non-biased approach for assessing the language of young children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar

Peverly, S. T., & Kitzen, K. R. (1998). Curriculum-based assessment of reading skills: Consideration and caveats for school psychologists. Psychology in the Schools, 35, 29–47.3.0.CO;2-P>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Piaget, J. (1950). Introduction à l'épistemologie génétique [Introduction to developmental epistemology]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York and Paris: International Universities Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Piaget, J. (1970). Le structuralisme [Structuralism]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France (Que sais-je?, No. 1311).Google Scholar

Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1969). The psychology of the child. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Poehner, M. E., & Lantolf, J. P. (2003, October). Dynamic assessment of L2 development: Bringing the past into the future (CALPER Working Papers, No. 1). University Park: Pennsylvania State University, Center for Advanced Language Proficiency Education and Research. Retrieved from calper.la.psu.edu/downloads/download.php?3, November 23, 2005.

Reed, H. B. C., Jr. (1968). The use of psychological tests in diagnosing brain damage in school children. In Haywood, H. C. (Ed.), Brain damage in school age children (pp. 109–127). Washington, DC: Council for Exceptional Children.Google Scholar

Reinharth, B. M. (1989). Cognitive modifiability in developmentally delayed children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Yeshiva University, New York.Google Scholar

Reitan, R. M. (1962). Psychological deficit. Annual Review of Psychology, 13, 415–444.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Reitan, R. M., & Wolfson, D. (1985). The Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery: Theory and clinical interpretation. Tucson, AZ: Neuropsychology Press.Google Scholar

Renzulli, J. S., & Westberg, K. L. (1991). Scale for rating students' participation in the local gifted education program. In Hunsaker, S. L., Frasier, M. M., Frank, E., Finley, V., & Klekotka, P. (1995). Performance of economically disadvantaged students placed in gifted programs through the Research-Based Assessment Plan (No. RM95208; p. 45). Storrs, CT: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.Google Scholar

Reschly, D. J. (1987). Assessing educational handicaps. In Weiner, I. B., Hess, A. K., & Allen, K. (Eds.), Handbook of forensic psychology (pp. 155–187). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Reschly, D. J. (1997). Diagnostic and treatment utility of intelligence tests. In Flanagan, D. P., Genschaft, J. L., & Harrison, P. L. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 437–456). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Rey, A. (1959). Test de copie et de réproduction de mémoire de figures géométriques complexes [Test of copying and reproducing from memory of complex geometric figures]. Paris: Centre de Psychologie Appliquée.Google Scholar

Rey, A. (1941). L'examen psychologique dans les cas d'encéphalopathie traumatique [Psychological assessment in cases of traumatic brain injury]. Archives de Psychologie, 28, 112.Google Scholar

Rey, A. (1959). Test de copie et de réproduction de mémoire de figures géométriques complexes [Test of copying and reproducing from memory of complex geometric figures]. Paris: Centre de Psychologie Appliquée.Google Scholar

Richards, R., Berninger, V., Nagy, W., Parsons, A., Field, K., & Richards, A. (2004). Dynamic assessment of child dyslexics' brain response to alternative spelling treatments. Education and Child Psychology, 22(2), 62–80.Google Scholar

Rosch, E. (1999). Principles of categorization. In Sternberg, R. J. & Wagner, R. K. (Eds.), Readings in cognitive psychology (pp. 225–241). Ft. Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College.Google Scholar

Roseberry, C. A., & Connell, P. J. (1991). The use of an invented language rule in the differentiation of normal and language-impaired Spanish-speaking children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 596–603.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rosenfield, S. (1987). Instructional consultation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Rumbaugh, D. M., & Washburn, D. A. (2003). Intelligence of apes and other rational beings. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saldaña, D. (2004). Dynamic Master Mind: Interactive use of a game for testing metacognition. School Psychology International, 25(4), 422–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Salvia, J., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (1991). Assessment (5th ed.). Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar

Sattler, J. M. (1988). Assessment of children (3rd ed.). San Diego, CA: Author.Google Scholar

Scarr-Salapatek, S. (1975). Genetics and the development of intelligence. In Horowitz, F. D., Hetherington, M., Scarr-Salapatek, S., & Siegel, G. (Eds.), Review of child development research (Vol. 4, pp. 1–57). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Sclan, S. G. (1986). Dynamic assessment and thought disorder in paranoid and nonparanoid schizophrenic patients. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.Google Scholar

Schlatter, C., & Büchel, F. P. (2000). Detecting reasoning abilities of persons with moderate mental retardation: The Analogical Reasoning Learning Test (ARLT). In Lidz, C. S. & Elliott, J. G. (Eds.), Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 155–186). Amsterdam: JAI/Elsevier Science.Google Scholar

Schloss, P. J., Smith, M. A., Hoover, T., & Wolford, J. (1987). Dynamic criterion-referenced vocational assessment: An alternative strategy for handicapped youth. Diagnostique, 12(2), 74–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schneider, E., & Ganshow, L. (2000). Dynamic assessment and instructional strategies for learners who struggle to learn foreign language. Dyslexia, 6, 72–82.3.0.CO;2-B>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schwebel, A. I. (1966). Effects of impulsivity on performance of verbal tasks in middle- and lower-class children. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 36, 13–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Shurin, R. (1998). Validity and reliability of the Application of Cognitive Functions Scale with preschool children with disabilities. (ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED435681; Clearinghouse Identifier: TM030312)

Siegler, R. S. (1998). Children's thinking (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Snow, R. E., & Yalow, E. (1982). Education and intelligence. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of human intelligence (pp. 493–585). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Spector, J. E. (1992). Predicting progress in beginning reading: Dynamic assessment of phonemic awareness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 353–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steiner, J. (1993). Psychic retreats: Pathological organizations in psychotic, neurotic, and borderline patients. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (1982). Reasoning, problem solving, and intelligence. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of human intelligence (pp. 225–307). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2002). Dynamic testing: The nature and measurement of learning potential. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Swanson, H. L. (1992). Generality and modifiability of working memory among skilled and less skilled readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 473–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Swanson, H. L. (1995). Effects of dynamic assessment on the classification of learning disabilities: The predictive and discriminant validity of the Swanson-Cognitive Processing Test (S-CPT). Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 13, 204–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Swanson, H. L. (2000). Swanson-Cognitive Processing Test: Review and applications. In Lidz, C. S. & Elliott, J. G. (Eds.), Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 71–107). Amsterdam: JAI/Elsevier Science.Google Scholar

Swanson, H. L., & Alexander, J. E. (1997). Cognitive processes as predictors of word recognition and reading comprehension in learning-disabled and skilled readers. Revisiting the specificity hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 128–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Switzky, H. N., & Haywood, H. C. (1974). Motivational orientation and the relative efficacy of self-monitored and externally imposed reinforcement systems in children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 360–366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Szymula, G. (1990). Vocational assessment. In Schiro-Geist, C. (Ed.), Vocational counseling for special populations (pp. 65–97). Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.Google Scholar

Tanner, H., & Jones, S. (2002). Assessment of children's mathematical thinking in practical modeling situations. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 21(4), 145–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tatik, T. (2000). A concurrent validity study between the Application of Cognitive Functions Scale and the Leiter-Revised International Performance Test. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED445033; Clearinghouse Identifier TM031638.)

Tawney, J. W., & Gast, D. L. (1984). Single subject research in special education. Columbus, OH: Merrill.Google Scholar

Teo, A., Carlson, E., Mathieu, P. J., Egeland, B., & Sroufe, L. A. (1996). A prospective longitudinal study of psychosocial predictors of achievement. Journal of School Psychology, 34(3), 285–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tissink, J., Hamers, J. H. M., & Van Luit, J. E. H. (1993). Learning potential tests with domain-general and domain-specific tasks. In Hamers, J. H. M., Sijtsma, K., & Ruijssenaars, A. J. J. M. (Eds.), Learning potential assessment: Theoretical, methodological and practical issues (pp. 243–266). Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar

Tymchuk, A. (1973). Effects of verbal concept training versus stimulus enhancement on verbal abstracting in institutionalized retarded delinquent boys. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 77, 551–555.Google Scholar

Tzuriel, D. (2000). The Cognitive Modifiability Battery (CMG): Assessment and intervention. In Lidz, C. S. & Elliott, J. G. (Eds.), Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 375–406). Amsterdam: JAI/Elsevier.Google Scholar

Tzuriel, D. (2001). Dynamic assessment of young children. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tzuriel, D., & Haywood, H. C. (1984). Exploratory behavior as a function of motivational orientation and task conditions. Personality and Individual Differences, 5(1), 67–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tzuriel, D., & Haywood, H. C. (1985). Locus of control and child-rearing practices in intrinsically motivated and extrinsically motivated children. Psychological Reports, 57, 887–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tzuriel, D., & Klein, P. S. (1985). Analogical thinking modifiability in disadvantaged, regular, special education, and mentally retarded children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 13, 539–552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tzuriel, D., & Samuels, M. T. (2000). Dynamic assessment of learning potential: Inter-rater reliability of deficient cognitive functions, type of mediation, and non-intellective factors. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 1, 41–64. Retrieved March 3, 2005 from www.iacep.coged.org/journal.Google Scholar

Tzuriel, D., & Schanck, T. (1994, July). Assessment of learning potential and reflectivity-impulsivity dimension. Paper presented at the 23rd International Congress of Applied Psychology, Madrid, Spain.

Utley, C. A., Haywood, H. C., & Masters, J. C. (1992). Policy implications of psychological assessment of minority children. In Haywood, H. C. & Tzuriel, D. (Eds.), Interactive assessment (pp. 445–469). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Valencia, S. W., Campione, J. C., Weiner, S., & Bazzi, S. (1990, December). Dynamic assessment of reading achievement. Paper presented at the National Reading Conference, Miami, FL.

Van der Aalsvoort, G. M., & Lidz, C. S. (2002). Reciprocity in dynamic assessment in classrooms: Taking contextual influences on individual learning into account. In Aaslsvoort, G. M., Resing, W. C. M., & Ruijssenaars, A. J. J. M. (Eds.), Learning potential assessment and cognitive training: Actual research and perspectives in theory building and methodology (pp. 111–144). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar

Aalsvoort, G. M., & Lidz, C. S. (in press). A cross-cultural validation study of the Application of Cognitive Functions Scale: A dynamic assessment procedure, with Dutch first grade students from regular primary schools. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 24(1).Google Scholar

Vaughn, B. E., Kopp, C. B., & Krakow, J. B. (1984). The emergence and consolidation of self-control from eighteen to thirty months of age: Normative trends and individual differences. Child Development, 55(3), 990–1004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Vye, N. J., Burns, M. S., Delclos, V. R., & Bransford, J. D. (1987). A comprehensive approach to assessing intellectually handicapped children. In Lidz, C. S. (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 327–359). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (1929). The problem of the cultural development of the child. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 36, 415–434.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original work published 1934)Google Scholar

Warren, A. (2002). MATHPLAN: A Diagnostic and Prescriptive Task Collection: A trip to the toystore. Cambridge, MA: Balanced Assessment in Mathematics Project, Harvard University, Educational Technology Center.Google Scholar

Warren, A. (2003, July). MATHPLAN: A Diagnostic and Prescriptive Task Collection: A Trip to the Toystore: A plan for evaluating the validity and reliability of a new dynamic assessment instrument. Unpublished paper presented at the International Association for Cognitive Education and Psychology Conference, Seattle, WA.

Warren, A. R. (2006). Evaluating the evaluator: An examination of two new methods for evaluating the skills of the teacher as dynamic assessor. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.Google Scholar

Weiss, A. A. (1964). The Weigl-Goldstein-Scheerer Color-Form Sorting Test: Classification of performance. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 20, 103–107.3.0.CO;2-W>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wellman, H. M., Ritter, K., & Flavell, J. (1975). Deliberate memory development in the delayed reactions of very young children. Developmental Psychology, 11, 780–787. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED445033; Clearinghouse Identifier TM031638)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wheeler, L., & Reitan, R. M. (1962). The presence and laterality of brain-damage predicted from responses to a short aphasia screening test. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 15, 783–799.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wiedl, K. H. (1999). Cognitive modifiability as a measure of readiness for rehabilitation. Psychiatric Services, 50(11), 1411–1413.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

iedl, K. H. (2003). Dynamic testing: A comprehensive model and current fields of application. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 3, 93–119. Retrieved from www.iacep.coged.org/journal, December 3, 2003.Google Scholar

Wiedl, K. H., & Schottke, H. (2002). Vorhersage des Erfolgs schizophrener Patienten in Einem psychedukativen Behandlungsprogramm durch indikatoren des Veranderungspotentials im Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Verhaltenstherapie, 12(2), 90–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wiedl, K. H., Schottke, H., Garcia, M., Calero, D. (2001). Dynamic assessment of cognitive rehabilitation potential in schizophrenic persons and in elderly persons with and without dementia. European Journal of Psychological Assessment 17(2), 112–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wiedl, K. H., Schottke, H., Green, M. F., & Nuechterlein, K. H. (2004). Dynamic testing in schizophrenia: Does training change the construct validity of a test? Schizophrenia Bulletin, 30(4), 703–711.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wiedl, K. H., Wienobst, J., Schottke, H. H., Green, M. F., & Nuechterlein, K. H. (2001). Attentional characteristics of schizophrenia patients differing in learning proficiency on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 27(4), 687–696.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., & Rodriguez, D. (1998). The development of children's motivation in school contexts. In Pearson, P. D. & Iran-Nigad, A. (Eds.), Review of research in education (Vol. 23). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar

Williams, R. H., & Zimmerman, D. W. (1996). Are simple gain scores obsolete? Applied Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 59–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wood, D. (1988). How children think and learn: The social contexts of cognitive development. Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Woodcock, R. W. (2002). New looks in the assessment of cognitive ability. Peabody Journal of Education, 77(2), 6–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zelazo, P. D., Müller, U., Frye, D., & Marcovitch, S. (2003). The development of executive function in early childhood. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 68, Serial No. 274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Zigler, E., Abelson, W. D., & Seitz, V. (1973). Motivational factors in the performance of economically disadvantaged children on the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test. Child Development, 44, 294–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zigler, E., & Butterfield, E. C. (1968). Motivational aspects of changes in IQ test performance of culturally deprived nursery school children. Child Development, 39, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abbott, S. P., Reed, E., Abbott, R. D., & Berninger, V. W. (1997). Year-long balanced reading/writing tutorial: A design experiment used for dynamic assessment. Learning Disability Quarterly, 20, 249–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Albrecht, J. E., O'Brien, E. J., Mason, R. A., & Myers, J. L. (1995). The role of perspective in the accessibility of goals during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21(2), 364–372.Google ScholarPubMed

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and the National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

Anastasi, A. (1965). Individual differences. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Aranov, Z. (1999). Validity and reliability of the ACFS Behavior Observation Scale. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED438294; Clearinghouse Identifier: TM030602)

Ashman, A. F. (1992). Process-based instruction: Integrating assessment and instruction. In Haywood, H. C. & Tzuriel, D. (Eds.), Interactive assessment (pp. 375–396). New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bain, B. A. (1994). A framework for dynamic assessment in phonology: Stimulability revisited. Clinical Communication Disorders, 4(1), 12–22.Google ScholarPubMed

Balzac, T., & Gaines, D. M. (n.d.). Dynamic multiple assessment: An instructional method that captures the symbiosis of assessment and instruction. Online download: Citeseer.ist.psu.edu/295525.html.

Barrera, M. (2003). Curriculum-based dynamic assessment for new- or second-language learners with learning disabilities in secondary education settings. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 29(1), 69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barsalou, L. W. (1992). Cognitive psychology: An overview for cognitive scientists. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Beavers, K. F., Kratochwill, T. R., & Braden, J. P. (2004). Treatment utility of functional versus empiric assessment within consultation for reading problems. School Psychology Quarterly, 19(1), 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beck, A. T. (1976). Cognitive therapy and emotional disorders. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar

Beck, A. T. (1991). Cognitive therapy: A 30-year retrospective. American Psychologist, 46, 369–375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bednar, M. R., & Kletzien, S. B. (1990). Dynamic assessment for reading: A validation. Paper presented at the National Reading Conference, Miami, FL.

Bensoussan, Y. (2002). The effectiveness of mediation on three subtests of the Application of Cognitive Functions Scale, a dynamic assessment procedure for young children. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 466635.

Bentley, A. M. (1980). Pattern reproduction in two cultures. International Journal of Psychology, 15(1), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berman, J. (2001). An application of dynamic assessment to school mathematical learning. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of New England, Armidale (Australia).

Berman, J., & Graham, L. (2002). School counsellor use of curriculum-based dynamic assessment. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 12(1), 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berninger, V. (2004). Brain-based assessment and instructional intervention. In Reid, G. & Fawcett, A. (Eds.), Dyslexia in context. Research, policy, and practice (pp. 90–119). London and Philadelphia: Whur Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berninger, V. W., & Abbott, R. D. (1994). Redefining learning disabilities: Moving beyond aptitude-achievement discrepancies to failure to respond to validated treatment protocols. In Lyon, G. R. (Ed.), Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities: New views on measurement issues (pp. 162–182). Baltimore: P. H. Brooks.Google Scholar

Blachowicz, C. L. Z. (1999). Vocabulary in dynamic reading assessment: Two case studies. Reading Psychology, 20(3), 213–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blaufarb, H. A. (1962). A demonstration of verbal abstracting ability in chronic schizophrenics under enriched stimulus and instructional conditions. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 26, 471–475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bleuler, M. (1950). Dementia praecox or the group of schizophrenias (Trans. H. Zenkin). New York: International Universities Press. (Original work published 1911)Google Scholar

Bleuler, M. (1978). The schizophrenic disorders: Long-term patient and family studies (Trans. S. M. Clemens). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. (Original work published 1972)Google Scholar

Blewitt, P. (1994). Understanding categorical hierarchies: The earliest levels of skill. Child Development, 65, 1279–1298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bloom, B. S., & Broder, L. J. (1950). Problem-solving processes of college students. School Review and Elementary School Journal, 73, 1–103.Google Scholar

Bodrova, E., & Leong, D. J. (1996). Tools of the mind: The Vygotskian approach to early childhood education. Columbus, OH: Merrill.Google Scholar

Boring, E. G. (1950). History of experimental psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar

Borkowski, J. G., Chan, L. K. S., & Muthukrishna, N. (2000). A process-oriented model of metacognition: Links between motivation and executive functioning. In Impara, J. C. & Murphy, L. L. (Managing Ed.), Buros-Nebraska series on measurement and testing: Issues in the measurement of metacognition (pp. 1–41). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurement.Google Scholar

Borkowski, J. G., Turner, Lisa A., & Nicholson, J. (2004). Toward a research agenda on higher-level cognitive skills. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology [online], 4, 188–198. www.iacep.coged.org/journal (Retrieved August 12, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bortner, M., & Birch, H. G. (1969). Cognitive capacity and cognitive competence. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 74, 735–744.Google Scholar

Bouchard, T. J. Jr., & McGue, M. (1981). Familial studies of intelligence: A review. Science, 212, 1055–1059.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bransford, J. D., Delclos, V. R., Vye, N. J., Burns, M. S., & Hasselbring, T. S. (1986). Improving the quality of assessment and instruction: Roles of dynamic assessment (Technical Report No. 1, Alternative Assessments of Handicapped Children). Nashville, TN: Kennedy Center, Vanderbilt University.Google Scholar

Braun, C., Rennie, B. J., & Gordon, C. J. (1987). An examination of contexts for reading assessment. Journal of Educational Research, 89(5), 283–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bronson, M. B. (2000). Self-regulation in early childhood: Nature and nurture. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Brooks, N. D. (1997). An exploratory study into the cognitive modifiability of pre-school children using dynamic assessment. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Newcastle-Upon-Tyne; Newcastle, United Kingdom.

Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1986). Psychological theory and the study of learning disabilities. American Psychologist, 14(10), 1059–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brozo, W. G. (1990). Learning how at-risk readers learn best: A case for interactive assessment. Journal of Reading, 33(7), 522–527.Google Scholar

Budoff, M. (1967). Learning potential among institutionalized young adult retardates. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 72, 404–411.

Budoff, M. (1971). Learning potential and institutional discharge rates among adult EMRs. RIEPrint #33. Cambridge, MA: Research Institute for Educational Problems.Google Scholar

Budoff, M. (1987). The validity of learning potential assessment. In Lidz, C. S. (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 52–81). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Budoff, M., & Friedman, M. (1964). “Learning potential” as an assessment approach to the adolescent mentally retarded. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 28, 434–439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Burns, M. S. (1980). Preschool children's approach and performance on cognitive tasks. Unpublished master's thesis, George Peabody College of Vanderbilt University.

Burns, M. S. (1985). Comparison of “graduated prompt” and “mediational” dynamic assessment and static assessment with young children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.Google Scholar

Burns, M. S., Haywood, H. C., & Delclos, V. R. (1987). Young children's problem- solving strategies: An observational study. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 8, 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butler, K. G. (1997). Dynamic assessment at the millennium: A transient tutorial for today! Journal of Children's Communication Development, 19(1), 43–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Call, R. J. (1973). Verbal abstracting performance of low-SES children: An exploration of Jensen's theory of mental retardation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, George Peabody College.Google Scholar

Campbell, R., Donaldson, M., & Young, B. (1976). Constraints on classificatory skills in young children. British Journal of Psychology, 67(1), 80–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Campione, J. C., & Brown, A. L. (1985). Dynamic assessment: One approach and some initial data (Technical Report No. 361). Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Institute of Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED269735)Google Scholar

Campione, J. C., & Brown, A. L. (1987). Linking dynamic assessment with school achievement. In Lidz, C. S. (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 82–140). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Campione, J. C., & Brown, A. L. (1990). Guided learning and transfer: Implications for approaches to assessment. In Frederiksen, N., Glaser, R., Lesgold, A., & Shafto, M. G. (Eds.), Diagnostic monitoring of skill and knowledge acquisition (pp. 141–172). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Campione, J. C., Brown, A. L., & Ferrara, R. A. (1982). Mental retardation and intelligence. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of human intelligence (pp. 392–490). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Carlson, J. (1995, July). Models of intelligence: Implications for cognitive education. Presidential address, Fifth International Congress, International Association for Cognitive Education; Monticello, New York. Unpublished manuscript; Seattle, WA: University of Washington, College of Education.Google Scholar

Carlson, J. S., & Das, J. P. (1997). A process approach to remediating word decoding deficiencies in Chapter 1 children. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 20(2), 93–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carlson, J. S., & Wiedl, K. H. (1980). Applications of a dynamic testing approach in intelligence assessment: Empirical results and theoretical formulations. Zeitschrift für Differentiele und Diagnostische Psychologie, 1, 303–318.Google Scholar

Carlson, J. S., & Wiedl, K. H. (1992a). Principles of dynamic assessment: The application of a specific model. Learning and Individual Differences, 4(2), 153–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carlson, J. S., & Wiedl, K. H. (1992b). The dynamic assessment of intelligence. In Haywood, H. C. & Tzuriel, D. (Eds.), Interactive assessment (pp. 167–186). New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carney, J. J., & Cioffi, G. (1990). Extending traditional diagnosis: The dynamic assessment of reading abilities. Reading Psychology, 11(3), 177–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carney, J. J., & Cioffi, G. (1992). The dynamic assessment of reading abilities. International Journal of Disability, Development, and Education, 39(2), 107–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chaiklin, S. (2003). The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky's analysis of learning and instruction. In Kozulin, A., Gindis, B., Ageyev, V. S., & Miller, S. M. (Eds.), Vygotsky's educational theory in cultural context (pp. 39–63). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chan, W. Y., Ashman, A. F., & Van Kraayenoord, C. E. (2000). Science and biological classification: Linking dynamic assessment to classroom curriculum. In Lidz, C. S. & Elliott, J. G. (Eds.), Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 607–639). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar

Cherkes-Julkowski, M., & Gertner, N. (1989). Spontaneous cognitive processes in handicapped children. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Churches, M., Skuy, M., & Das, J. P. (2002). Identification and remediation of reading difficulties based on successive processing deficits and delays in general reading. Psychological Reports, 91 (3, Pt1), 813–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cioffi, G., & Carney, J. J. (1983). The dynamic assessment of reading disabilities. Reading Teacher, 36, 764–768.Google Scholar

Cohen, D. (2002). How the child's mind develops. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar

Cooper, L. A., & Regan, D. T. (1982). Attention, perception, and intelligence. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of human intelligence (pp. 123–169). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copple, C., Sigel, I. E., & Saunders, R. (1984). Educating the young thinker: Classroom strategies for cognitive growth. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Craig, H. K., & Evans, J. L. (1993). Pragmatics with SLI: Within-group variations in discourse behaviors. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 36, 777–789.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cronbach, L. J., & Furby, L. (1970). How we should measure change – or should we? Psychological Bulletin, 74, 68–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Das, J. P., Kar, B. C., & Parrila, R. K. (1996). Cognitive planning: The psychological basis of intelligent behavior. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Das, J. P., Mishra, R. K., & Pool, J. E. (1995). An experiment on cognitive remediation of word-reading difficulty. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 66–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Das, J. P., & Naglieri, J. A. (1997). Das/Naglieri: Cognitive Assessment System. Itasca, IL: Riverside.Google Scholar

Das, J. P., Naglieri, J. A., & Kirby, J. R. (1994). Assessment of cognitive processes: The PASS theory of intelligence. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar

Delclos, V. R., Burns, M. S., & Vye, N. J. (1993). A comparison of teachers' responses to dynamic and traditional assessment reports. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 11(1), 46–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Delclos, V. R., Vye, N. J., Burns, M. S., Bransford, J. D., & Hasslebring, T. S. (1992). In Haywood, H. C. & Tzuriel, D. (Eds.), Interactive assessment (pp. 317–331). New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Delclos, V. R., Vye, N. J., Johnson, R. T., & Bransford, J. D. (1987). Effects of dynamic assessment feedback on teacher instruction (Technical Report No. 12, Alternative Assessments of Handicapped Children). Nashville, TN: Kennedy Center, Vanderbilt University.Google Scholar

DeLoache, J. S. (1991). Symbolic functioning in very young children: Understanding of pictures and models. Child Development, 62, 736–752.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

DeLoache, J. S. (1995). Early understanding and use of symbols: The Model model. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 109–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Desoete, A., Roeyers, H., Buysse, A., & De Clercq, A. (2002). Dynamic assessment of metacognitive skills in young children with mathematics learning disabilities. In Aaslsvoort, G. M., Resing, W. C. M., & Ruijssenaars, A. J. J. M. (Eds.), Learning potential assessment and cognitive training: Actual research and perspectives in theory building and methodology (pp. 307–333). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar

Deutsch, R. (2003). Mediation from the perspective of mediated learning experience. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 3, 29–45. Retrieved from www.iacep.coged.org/journal October 14, 2004.Google Scholar

Dodge, D. T., & Colker, L. J. (1992). The creative curriculum for early childhood (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Teaching Strategies.Google Scholar

Drahozal, E. (1997). Validity Information for the Iowa Tests of Basic Skills (ITBS) and Iowa Tests of Educational Development (ITED). Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing Co.Google Scholar

Ehrlenmeyer-Kimling, L., & Jarvik, L. F. (1963). Genetics and intelligence: A review. Science, 142, 1477–1479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eisenberg, N., & Harris, J. D. (1984). Social competence: A developmental perspective. School Psychology Review, 13(3), 267–277.Google Scholar

Elder, J. H., & Goodman, J. J. (1996). Social turn-taking of children with neuropsychiatric impairments and their parents. Issues in Comprehensive Pediatric Nursing, 19(4), 249–262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Elliott, J. (1993). Assisted assessment: If it is “dynamic” why is it so rarely employed? Educational and Child Psychology, 10(4), 48–58.Google Scholar

Elliott, J. G. (2000). Dynamic assessment in educational contexts: Purpose and promise. In Lidz, C. S. & Elliott, J. G. (Eds.), Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 713–740). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar

Elliott, J. (2003). Dynamic assessment in educational settings: Realising potential. Educational Review, 55(1), 15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elrod, G. F., & Tesolowski, D. G. (1993). Best practices in the vocational assessment of special needs learners. In Vance, H. B. (Ed.), Best practices in assessment for school and clinical settings (pp. 69–111). Brandon, VT: Clinical Psychology Publishing.Google Scholar

Embretson, S. E. (1987). Toward development of a psychometric approach. In Lidz, C. S. (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 141–170). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Estes, W. K. (1982). Learning, memory, and intelligence. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of human intelligence (pp. 170–224). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Feather, N. T. (1961). The relationship of persistence at a task to expectation of success and achievement related motives. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63(3), 552–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar