data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88773/887733615ab9af17573281d24aa715f33b632a14" alt=""
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Foreword
- Part I Cheirogaleidae: evolution, taxonomy, and genetics
- 1 Cheirogaleid diversity and evolution: big questions about small primates
- 2 The taxonomy of Cheirogaleidae: an ever-expanding species list
- 3 Mitogenomics of the family Cheirogaleidae and relationships to taxonomy and biogeography in Madagascar
- 4 Why cheirogaleids are bad models for primate ancestors: a phylogenetic reconstruction
- 5 Contact zones and species sympatry in dwarf lemurs (genus Cheirogaleus): the roles of ecological adaptation and sexual selection
- Part II Methods for studying captive and wild cheirogaleids
- Part III Cheirogaleidae: behavior and ecology
- Part IV Cheirogaleidae: sensory ecology, communication, and cognition
- Part V Cheirogaleidae: conservation biogeography
- Index
- Plate section
- References
5 - Contact zones and species sympatry in dwarf lemurs (genus Cheirogaleus): the roles of ecological adaptation and sexual selection
from Part I - Cheirogaleidae: evolution, taxonomy, and genetics
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 March 2016
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Foreword
- Part I Cheirogaleidae: evolution, taxonomy, and genetics
- 1 Cheirogaleid diversity and evolution: big questions about small primates
- 2 The taxonomy of Cheirogaleidae: an ever-expanding species list
- 3 Mitogenomics of the family Cheirogaleidae and relationships to taxonomy and biogeography in Madagascar
- 4 Why cheirogaleids are bad models for primate ancestors: a phylogenetic reconstruction
- 5 Contact zones and species sympatry in dwarf lemurs (genus Cheirogaleus): the roles of ecological adaptation and sexual selection
- Part II Methods for studying captive and wild cheirogaleids
- Part III Cheirogaleidae: behavior and ecology
- Part IV Cheirogaleidae: sensory ecology, communication, and cognition
- Part V Cheirogaleidae: conservation biogeography
- Index
- Plate section
- References
Summary
Introduction
Species divergence is driven by multiple factors, obfuscating the speciation mechanisms responsible for the diversity of life. The speciation mechanisms that dominate the literature are biogeographic models emphasizing allopatric speciation, or adaptive models invoking ecological adaptation and sexual selection (Coyne and Orr, 2004; Nosil, 2012). In the classic biogeographic model, vicariance is the dominant mechanism of speciation, in which previously interbreeding populations are sundered by a dispersal barrier (Ronquist, 1997; Ree and Smith, 2008; Ree and Sanmartín, 2009). The subdivided populations accumulate genetic differences due to drift, leading to reproductive isolation via genetic incompatibilities (Dobzhansky, 1937; Mayr, 1947; Orr, 1996). In the strict vicariant model, no divergent adaptation is necessary and the daughter species retain the niche of the ancestor, because their divergence was due to some physical dispersal barrier only (phylogenetic niche conservatism; Wiens et al., 2010). If the dispersal barriers disappear, the newly formed species may meet at contact zones, but species boundaries are maintained and hybridization is limited by genetic incompatibilities (Coyne and Orr, 1998).
In contrast, adaptive models, especially ecological speciation, posit that species diverge via local adaptation to different habitats (Nosil, 2012). Contact zones exist at parapatric species boundaries, such as in ecotones of the different habitats (Schluter, 2001). Hybridization may be limited by lower fitness of immigrants into suboptimal habitats (prezygotic), or by lower fitness of hybrids because they are maladapted to the preferred habitat of either parent species (postzygotic; Nosil et al., 2005). Immigrants into ecotones and suboptimal habitats may have lower fitness due to competition with neighboring, closely related species that are well adapted to that habitat (Bridle and Vines, 2007). Alternatively, immigrants into the neighbor species' habitats may exhibit ecological character displacement, altering their phenotypes and ecology to avoid competition and persist (Schluter, 2000; Case et al., 2005; Grant and Grant, 2006). The dynamics in contact zones offer an excellent opportunity to tease apart the subtle differences in geographic speciation mechanisms.
Speciation mechanisms related to behavior, especially sexual selection, are less frequently cited (Panhuis et al., 2001). Reinforcement is the positive selection for trait divergence driven by sexual selection and accentuated when closely related species are found in sympatry compared to in allopatry (Noor, 1999).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Dwarf and Mouse Lemurs of MadagascarBiology, Behavior and Conservation Biogeography of the Cheirogaleidae, pp. 113 - 132Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
- 2
- Cited by