Abbas, T. (2019). ‘Implementing “Prevent” in countering violent extremism in the UK: A left-realist critique’, Critical Social Policy, 39(3), 396–412.Google Scholar

Abosede Durokifa, A. and Ijeoma, E. C. (2018). ‘Neo-colonialism and Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) in Africa: A blend of an old wine in a new bottle’, African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 10(3), 355–366.Google Scholar

Acharya, A. (2014). Constructing a security community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the problem of regional order. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Adler, E. and Barnett, M. (1998). ‘Security communities in theoretical perspective’ In Adler, Emmanuel and Barnett, Michael (eds.) Security communities, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

African Union. (2000). ‘Constitutive Act of the African Union’, available at: au.int/sites/default/files/pages/34873-file-constitutiveact_en.pdf [accessed 22/05/2022].Google Scholar

Altman, A. and Wellman, C. H. (2009). A liberal theory of international justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amnesty International. (2017). Dangerously disproportionate: The ever-expanding national security state in Europe. London: Amnesty International.Google Scholar

Amnesty International. (2018). ‘France: “Dehumanising” counter-terror measures being used to unjustly punish people – New report’, available at: www.amnesty.org.uk/press-releases/france-dehumanising-counter-terror-measures-being-used-unjustly-punish-people-new [accessed 31/03/2022].Google Scholar

Annan, K. (1999). ‘Secretary-General presents his annual report to general assembly’ 20 September 1999, available at: www.un.org/press/en/1999/19990920.sgsm7136.html [accessed 19/06/2023].Google Scholar

Annan, K. (2000). ‘We the peoples: The role of the United Nations in the 21st century, United Nations’, available at: digitallibrary.un.org/record/413745?ln=en [accessed 19/06/2023].Google Scholar

Annan, K. (2005). In larger freedom: Towards development, security and human rights for all, available at: www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/59/2005 [accessed 25/09/2019].Google Scholar

Aradau, C. (2004). ‘Security and the democratic scene: Desecuritization and emancipation’, Journal of International Relations and Development, 7(4), 388–413.Google Scholar

Audard, C. (2007). John Rawls. Stocksfield: Acumen.Google Scholar

Aust, A. (2010). Handbook of international law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Axworthy, L. (2016). ‘Resetting the narrative on peace and security: R2P in the next ten years’ In Bellamy, Alex J. and Dunne, Tim (eds.) The Oxford handbook of the responsibility to protect, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 968–983.Google Scholar

Axworthy, L. and Rock, A. (2012). ‘Making R2P work: Now and in the future’ In Knight, W. Andy and Egerton, Frazer (eds.) The Routledge handbook of the responsibility to protect, London: Routledge, pp. 181–193.Google Scholar

Bain, W. (2014). ‘The pluralist-solidarist debate in the English school’ In Navari, Cornelia and Green, Daniel M. (eds.) Guide to the English school in international studies, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. pp. 159–169.Google Scholar

Balzacq, T. (2011). ‘A theory of securitization: Origins, core assumptions, and variants’ In Balzacq, Thierry (ed.) Securitization theory: How security problems emerge and dissolve, London: Routledge, pp. 1–30.Google Scholar

Baylis, J., Smith, S., and Owens, P. (Eds.). (2020). The globalization of world politics: An introduction to international relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

BBC. (2019). ‘Climate emergency is Oxford dictionary’s word of the year 2019’, available at: www.bbc.co.uk/newsround/50499514 [accessed 11/07/2023].Google Scholar

Beauchamp, T. (2019). ‘The principle of beneficence in applied ethics’ In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2019 Edition), plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2019/entries/principle-beneficence/.Google Scholar

Beitz, C. R. (2009). The idea of human rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Belk, R. and Noyes, M. (2012). On the use of offensive cyber capabilities a policy analysis on offensive US cyber policy. Harvard Kennedy School, available at: citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.297.1370&rep=rep1&type=pdf [accessed 18/02/2019].Google Scholar

Bellamy, A. J. (2018). ‘The responsibility to protect’ In Williams, Paul D. and McDonald, Matt (eds.) Security studies: An introduction, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 235–249.Google Scholar

Bellamy, A. J. (2015). ‘The three pillars of the responsibility to protect’, Pensamiento propio, 41(20), 35–64.Google Scholar

Bellamy, A. J. (2016). ‘UN security council’ In Bellamy, Alex J. and Dunne, Tim (eds.) The Oxford handbook of the responsibility to protect, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 249–268.Google Scholar

Bellamy, A. J. and Williams, P. D. (2012). ‘On the limits of moral hazard: The “responsibility to protect”, armed conflict and mass atrocities’, European Journal of International Relations, 18(3), 539–571.Google Scholar

Berenskoetter, F. (2014). ‘Friendship, security and power’, available at eprints.soas.ac.uk/17941/1/berenskoetter-friendship-security-and-power.pdf [accessed 17/10/2019].Google Scholar

Bertrand, S. (2018). ‘Can the subaltern securitize? Postcolonial perspectives on securitization theory and its critics’, European Journal of International Security, 3(3), 281–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Betts, A. and Collier, P. (2017). Refuge: Transforming a broken refugee system. London: Penguin, UK.Google Scholar

Betts, A. and Collier, P. (2018). ‘How Europe can reform its migration policy, foreign affairs’, available at: www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/europe/2018-10-05/how-europe-can-reform-its-migration-policy [accessed 20/02/2019].Google Scholar

Biggar, N. (2020). What’s wrong with rights? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Blackburn, S. (2005). Oxford: Dictionary of philosophy, second edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bloomfield, A. (2017). ‘Resisting the responsibility to protect’ In Bloomfield, Alan and Scott, Shirley V. (eds.) Norm antipreneurs and the politics of resistance to global normative change, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 20–38.Google Scholar

Booth, K. (1991). ‘Security and emancipation’, Review of International Studies, 17(4), 313–326.Google Scholar

Booth, K. (2007). Theory of world security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Boucher, D. (1998). Political theories of international relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bourbeau, P. and Vuori, J. A. (2015). ‘Security, resilience and desecuritization: Multidirectional moves and dynamics’, Critical Studies on Security, 3(3), 253–268.Google Scholar

Breen-Smyth, M. (2014). ‘Theorising the “suspect community”: Counterterrorism, security practices and the public imagination’, Critical Studies on Terrorism, 7(2), 223–240.Google Scholar

Brock, G. (2008). ‘Taxation and global justice: Closing the gap between theory and practice’, Journal of Social Philosophy, 39(2), 161–184.Google Scholar

Brock, G. (2009). Global justice: A cosmopolitan account. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Brock, G. (2017). ‘Global justice’ In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2017 Edition), plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/justice-global/Google Scholar

Brown, C. R. (1998). ‘Common-Sense Ethics’, doi:10.4324/9780415249126-L011-1. Routledge Encyclopaedia of Philosophy, Taylor and Francis, www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/common-sense-ethics/v-1.Google Scholar

Browning, C. S. and McDonald, M. (2013). ‘The future of critical security studies: Ethics and the politics of security’, European Journal of International Relations, 19(2), 235–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brunstetter, D. and Braun, M. (2013). ‘From jus ad bellum to jus ad vim: Recalibrating our understanding of the moral use of force’, Ethics & International Affairs, 27(1), 87–106.Google Scholar

Brunstetter, D. (2021). Just and unjust uses of limited force: A moral argument with contemporary illustrations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Buchanan, A. (2018). Institutionalizing the just war. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Buckley, E. (2006). Invoking Article 5, NATO Review, summer 2006.Google Scholar

Burke, A. (2020). ‘Review of the morality of security: A theory of just securitization’. By Rita Floyd. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019. 258p. $99.00 cloth. Perspectives on Politics, September 2020 | Vol. 18/No. 3, 1009-10.Google Scholar

Burke, A., Lee-Koo, K., and McDonald, M. (2014). Ethics and global security: A cosmopolitan approach. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Buzan, B. (2004). From international to world society?: English school theory and the social structure of globalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Buzan, B., Wæver, O., and de Wilde, J.. (1998). Security: A new framework for analysis. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar

Cabinet Office. (2010). A strong Britain in an age of uncertainty: The national security strategy (Vol. 7953). London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar

Cambridge Online Dictionary. (2019). ‘Mandatory’, dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/mandatory [accessed 19/07/2019].Google Scholar

Caney, S. (2005). Justice beyond borders: A global political theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Caney, S. (2010). ‘Cosmopolitan justice, responsibility, and global climate change’. In Gardiner, Stephen M., Caney, Simon, Jamieson, Dale, and Shue, Henry (eds.) Climate ethics: Essential readings. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 122–145.Google Scholar

Castree, N., Kitchin, R., and Rogers, A. (2013). A dictionary of human geography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cater, C. and Malone, D. M. (2016). ‘The genesis of R2P: Kofi Anna’s intervention dilemma’ In Bellamy, Alex J. and Dunne, Tim (eds.) The Oxford handbook of the responsibility to protect, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 114–132.Google Scholar

Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED). (2015). ‘The Human Cost of Natural Disasters’, available at reliefweb.int/report/world/human-cost-natural-disasters-2015-global-perspective [accessed 22/06/2021].Google Scholar

Chalk, F., Dallaire, R., and Matthews, K. (2012). ‘The responsibility to react’ In Knight, W. Andy and Egerton, Frazer (eds.) The Routledge handbook of the responsibility to protect, London: Routledge, pp. 36–49.Google Scholar

Chandler, D. and Hynek, N. (Eds.). (2011). Critical perspectives on human security: Rethinking emancipation and power in international relations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Chertoff, M. and Rasmussen, A. F. (2019). ‘The Unhackable Election: What it takes to defend democracy’. Foreign Affairs, January/February 2019, pp. 156–164.Google Scholar

Chesterman, S. (2001). Just war or just peace? Humanitarian intervention and international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Chigwedere, P., Seage, G. R. 3rd, Gruskin, S., Lee, T. H., and Essex, M. (2008). ‘Estimating the lost benefits of antiretroviral drug use in South Africa’. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 49(4), 410–415. doi: 10.1097/qai.0b013e31818a6cd5. PMID: 19186354.Google Scholar

Cholbi, M. (2017). ‘Suicide’ In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2017 Edition), plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/suicide/.Google Scholar

Clarke, M. (2011). ‘Curious Victory for NATO in Libya’, London: Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) available here rusi.org/commentary/curious-victory-nato-libya [accessed 08/04/2019].Google Scholar

Cochran, M. (2014). ‘Normative theory in the English school’ In Navari, Cornelia and Green, Daniel M. (eds.) Guide to the English school in international studies, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 205–221.Google Scholar

Cohen, R. (2012). ‘From sovereign responsibility to R2P’ In Knight, W. Andy and Egerton, Frazer (eds.) The Routledge handbook of the responsibility to protect, London: Routledge, pp. 7–2.Google Scholar

Collier, P. (2007). The bottom billion: Why the poorest countries are failing and what can be done about it. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Conca, K. and Dabelko, G. D. (Eds.). (2002). Environmental peacemaking. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.Google Scholar

Corera, G. (2019). ‘NATO: Cyber-attack on One Nation Is an Attack on All’, 27 August 2019 BBC news website available at: www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-49488614 [accessed 26/02/2021].Google Scholar

Corry, O. (2012). ‘Securitisation and “riskification”: Second-order security and the politics of climate change’, Millennium, 40(2), 235–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Côté, A. (2016). ‘Agents without agency: Assessing the role of the audience in securitization theory’, Security Dialogue, 47(6), 541–558.Google Scholar

Coticchia, F. and Davidson, J. W. (2019). Italian foreign policy during Matteo Renzi’s government: A domestically focused outsider and the world. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Council on Foreign Relations. (2018). ‘The UN Security Council’, available here www.cfr.org/backgrounder/un-security-council [accessed 25/07/2019].Google Scholar

Delmas, C. (2018). A duty to resist: When disobedience should be uncivil. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deutsche Welle. (2017). ‘NATO: Russia Targeted German Army with Fake News Campaign’, available at www.dw.com/en/nato-russia-targeted-german-army-with-fake-news-campaign/a-37591978 [accessed 07/10/2019].Google Scholar

Dey, A., Heinemann, C., and Unger, C. (2017). ‘Das Rätsel um die Kosten des G20-Gipfels’ Hamburger Abendblatt available www.abendblatt.de/hamburg/g20/article211016533/Das-Raetsel-um-die-Kosten.html [accessed 05/04/2019].Google Scholar

Dill, J. (2016). ‘Forcible alternatives to war’ In Ohlin, Jens David (ed.) Theoretical boundaries of armed conflict and human rights. ASIL Studies in International Legal Theory, New York, USA: Cambridge University Press, pp. 289–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dimari, G. and Papadakis, N. (2022). ‘The securitization of the Covid-19 pandemic in Greece: A just or unjust securitization?’, Quality & Quantity doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01341-9Google Scholar

Dobos, N. and Coady, C. A. J. (2014). ‘All or nothing: Are there any “merely permissible” armed humanitarian interventions?’ In Scheid, Don E. (eds.) The ethics of armed humanitarian intervention, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 78–94.Google Scholar

Doherty, K. (2014). ‘What an Ebola Curfew Looks Like’, The Guardian, 15 December 2014 available www.theguardian.com/cities/2014/dec/15/ebola-curfew-sierra-leone-freetown-photographs [accessed 25/02/2019].Google Scholar

Donnelly, J. (2003). Universal human rights in theory & practice, 2nd edition, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Doyal, L. and Gough, I. (1991). A theory of human needs, Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Doyle, M. (2016). ‘R2P before and after Libya’ In Bellamy, Alex J. and Dunne, Tim (eds.) The Oxford handbook of the responsibility to protect, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 673–690.Google Scholar

Duffield, M. (2007). Development, security and unending war: Governing the world of peoples. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Dunford, R. and Neu, M. (2019). Just war and the responsibility to protect: A critique. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar

Dunn Cavelty, M. (2010). ‘Cyber-threats’ In Cavelty, Myriam Dunn and Mauer, Victor (eds.) The Routledge handbook of security studies, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 180–189.Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, D. (2010). ‘The “organic law” of Ex Parte Milligan’ In Sarat, Austin (eds.) Sovereignty, emergency, legality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 16–56.Google Scholar

Dworkin, G. (2020). ‘Paternalism’ In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2020 Edition), plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/paternalism/.Google Scholar

Eckersley, R. (2007). ‘Ecological intervention: Prospects and limits’, Ethics & International Affairs, 21(3), 293–316.Google Scholar

Egerton, F. (2012). ‘What is right with R2P?’ In Knight, W. Andy and Egerton, Frazer (eds.) The Routledge handbook of the responsibility to protect, London: Routledge, pp. 77–84.Google Scholar

Erskine, T. (2003). ‘Introduction: Making sense of “responsibility” in international relations – key questions and concepts’. In Can institutions have responsibilities? collective moral agency and international relations. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar

Erskine, T. (2016). ‘Moral agents of protection and supplementary responsibilities to protect’ In Bellamy, Alex J. and Dunne, Tim (eds.) The Oxford handbook of the responsibility to protect, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 167–185.Google Scholar

ESCR. (2019). ‘Non-State Actors’, available at www.escr-net.org/resources/non-state-actors [accessed 12/11/2019].Google Scholar

EUCOM. (2018). ‘House Armed Services Committee Hearing On Security Challenges In Europe’, 16 March, available at www.eucom.mil/transcript/36275/test [accessed 7/11/2023].Google Scholar

EUR-Lex. (2023). ‘Mutual Defence Clause’, available at eur-lex.europa.eu/EN/legal-content/glossary/mutual-defence-clause.html [accessed 11/7/23].Google Scholar

EUROPA. (2019). ‘The EU in Brief: Goals and Values’ available at europa.eu/european-union/about-eu/eu-in-brief_en [accessed 22/07/2019].Google Scholar

European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. (2019). ‘Factsheet about Dengue Fever’ available at ecdc.europa.eu/en/dengue-fever/facts/factsheet [accessed 25/02/2019].Google Scholar

European Commission. (2016). Directorate-General for Communication, Juncker, J., State of the Union 2016, Publications Office of the European Union, 2016, data.europa.eu/doi/10.2775/968989Google Scholar

European Union. (2016). ‘A Global Strategy for the European Union’s Foreign And Security Policy‐Shared Vision, Common Action: A Stronger Europe’.Google Scholar

European Union External Action Service. (2016). ‘European Neighborhood Policy (ENP)’ available at eeas.europa.eu/diplomatic-network/european-neighbourhood-policy-enp/330/european-neighbourhood-policy-enp_enGoogle Scholar

Evangelista, M. (2008). Law, ethics, and the war on terror. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Evans, G. (2009). ‘The responsibility to protect in environmental emergencies’, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law), 103, 27–32.Google Scholar

Evans, G. and Newnham, J. (1998). The Penguin dictionary of international relations. London: Penguin Group USA.Google Scholar

Fabre, C. (2007). ‘Mandatory rescue killings’, The Journal of Political Philosophy, 15(4), 363–384.Google Scholar

Fabre, C. (2012). Cosmopolitan war. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Falkner, R. (2016). ‘The Paris Agreement and the new logic of international climate politics’, International Affairs, 92(5), 1107–1125.Google Scholar

Feinberg, J. (1961). ‘Supererogation and rules’, Ethics, 71(4), 276–288.Google Scholar

Fierke, K. M. (2007). Critical approaches to international security. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Finlay, C. J. (2015). Terrorism and the right to resist: A theory of just revolutionary war. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Flinch Midtgaard, S. (2021). ‘Paternalism, Oxford Research Encyclopaedia of Politics’, doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.201Google Scholar

Floyd, J. (2017a). Is political philosophy impossible?: Thoughts and behaviour in normative political theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Floyd, J. (2017b). ‘Rawls methodological blueprint’, European Journal of Political Theory, 16(3), 367–381.Google Scholar

Floyd, R. (2010). Security and the environment: Securitization theory and US environmental security policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Floyd, R. (2011). ‘Why we need needs-based justifications of human rights’, Journal of International Political Theory, 7(1), 103–115.Google Scholar

Floyd, R. (2016a). ‘Extraordinary or ordinary emergency measures: What, and who, defines the “success” of securitisation?’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 29(2), 677–694.Google Scholar

Floyd, R. (2016b). ‘The promises of just securitization theories’ In Nyman, Jonna and Burke, Anthony (eds.) Ethical security studies: A new research agenda, London: Routledge, pp. 75–88.Google Scholar

Floyd, R. (2018). ‘Parallels with the hate speech debate: The pros and cons of criminalising harmful securitising requests’, Review of International Studies, 44(1), 43–63.Google Scholar

Floyd, R. (2019a) The morality of security: A theory of just securitization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Floyd, R. (2019b). ‘Collective securitization in the EU: Normative dimensions’, West European Politics, 42(2), 391–412.Google Scholar

Floyd, R. (2019c). ‘States, last resort, and the obligation to securitize’, Polity, 51(2), 378–394.Google Scholar

Floyd, R. (2019d). ‘Evidence of securitisation in the economic sector of security in Europe? Russia’s economic blackmail of Ukraine and the EU’s conditional bailout of Cyprus’, European Security, 28(2), 173–192, DOI: 10.1080/09662839.2019.1604509Google Scholar

Floyd, R. (2021). ‘Securitisation and the function of functional actors’, Critical Studies on Security, 9(2), 81–97, DOI: 10.1080/21624887.2020.1827590Google Scholar

Floyd, R. (2022). ‘The morality of security: A reply to critics and where to from here’, European Journal of International Security, 7(2), 275–282.Google Scholar

Foreign Affairs Council. (2014). ‘Council Condemns the Illegal Referendum in Crimea’, 17 March available at www.consilium.europa.eu/en/meetings/fac/2014/03/17/ [accessed 05/06/2020].Google Scholar

Fox, C. (2019). ‘What’s special about the insult of paternalism?’, Law and Philosophy, 38(3), 313–334.Google Scholar

Frederick, D. (2015). ‘Pro tanto obligations and Ceteris-Paribus rules’, Journal of Moral Philosophy, 1, 255–266.Google Scholar

Friend, C. (2004). ‘Social Contract Theory’ Internet Encyclopaedia of Philosophy available at www.iep.utm.edu/soc-cont/ [accessed 06/03/2019].Google Scholar

Fritz, O., Christen, E., Sinabell, F., and Hinz, J. (2017). ‘Russia’s and the EU’s sanctions. Economic and trade effects, compliance and the way forward’. WIFO Studies.Google Scholar

Frowe, H. (2011). The ethics of war and peace: An introduction, Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Frowe, H. (2014a). Defensive killing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Frowe, H. (2014b). ‘Judging armed humanitarian intervention’ In Scheid, Don E. (eds.) The ethics of armed humanitarian intervention, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 95–112.Google Scholar

Frowe, H. (2016). The ethics of war and peace, second edition, Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Frowe, H. (2018). ‘Lesser-evil justifications for harming: Why we’re required to turn the trolley’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 68(272), 460–480.Google Scholar

Fukuyama, F. (2018). ‘Against identity politics: The new tribalism and the crisis of democracy’, Foreign Affairs, 97, 90.Google Scholar

Gardner, J. (2001). ‘The mysterious case of the reasonable person’, The University of Toronto Law Journal, 51, 273.Google Scholar

Gardner, J., (2015). ‘The many faces of the reasonable person’, Law Quarterly Review, 131(1), 563–584.Google Scholar

Gauthier, D. P. (1969). The logic of Leviathan: The moral and political theory of Thomas Hobbes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Glanville, L. (2013). Sovereignty and the responsibility to protect. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Glanville, L. (2014). ‘Is just intervention morally obligatory?’ In Gentry, Caron E. and Eckert, Amy E. (eds.) The future of just war, Athens: University of Georgia Press, pp. 48–61.Google Scholar

Glanville, L. (2021). Sharing responsibility: The history and future of protection from atrocities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Glanville, L. and Pattison, J. (2021). ‘Where to protect? Prioritization and the responsibility to protect’, Ethics & International Affairs, 35(2), 213–225.Google Scholar

Goodin, R. E. (1988). ‘What is so special about our fellow countrymen?’, Ethics, 98(4), 663–686.Google Scholar

Graham, G. (2008). Ethics and international relations, second edition, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar

Griffin, J. (2008). On human rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Grigore, N. (2019). ‘On why there is a problem of supererogation’, Philosophia, 47(4), 1141–1163.Google Scholar

Gross, M. and Meisels, T. (Eds.) (2017). Soft war: The ethics of unarmed conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Halbfinger, D. M. (2020). ‘Virus Soars Among Ultra-Orthodox Jews as Many Flout Israel’s Rules’ New York Times, 30 May 2020.Google Scholar

Hansen, L. (2012). ‘Reconstructing desecuritization: The normative-political in the Copenhagen School and directions for how to apply it’, Review of International Studies, 38(03), 525–546.Google Scholar

Hansen, L. (2020). ‘Are “core” feminist critiques of securitization theory racist? A reply to Alison Howell and Melanie Richter-Montpetit’, Security Dialogue, 51(4), 378–385.Google Scholar

Hansen, L., & Nissenbaum, H. (2009). ‘Digital disaster, cyber security, and the Copenhagen School’, International studies quarterly, 53(4), 1155–1175.Google Scholar

Harms, W. and Juncker, P. (2019). ‘Wie regeln andere EU-Länder die Grundsicherung?’ Taggesschau, 6.03.2019Google Scholar

Harrington, J. (2012). ‘R2P and natural disasters’ In Knight, W. Andy and Egerton, Frazer (eds.) The Routledge handbook of the responsibility to protect, London: Routledge, pp. 141–150.Google Scholar

Haworth, L. (1955). ‘Common sense morality’, Ethics, 65(4), 250–260.Google Scholar

Hehir, A. (2017). ‘“Utopian in the right sense”: The responsibility to protect and the logical necessity of reform’, Ethics & International Affairs, 31(3), 335–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hehir, A. (2019). Hollow norms and the responsibility to protect. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Hehir, A. and Lang, A. (2015). ‘The impact of the security council on the efficacy of the international criminal court and the responsibility to protect’, Criminal Law Forum, 26, 153–179.Google Scholar

Herington, J. (2013). ‘The concept of security: Uncertainty, Evidence and Value’, PhD diss., Australian National University.Google Scholar

Herington, J. (2015). ‘Philosophy: The concepts of security, fear, liberty, and the state’ In Bourbeau, Philippe (ed.) Security: Dialogue across disciplines, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 22–44.Google Scholar

Heyd, D. (2019). ‘Supererogation’ In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2019 Edition), plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2019/entries/supererogation/.Google Scholar

Hill, M., Campanale, D. and Joel, G. (2021). ‘“Their goal is to destroy everyone”: Uighur camp detainees allege systematic rape’, BBC News 02, February 2021.Google Scholar

HM Government. (2015). ‘National Security Strategy and Strategic Defence and Security Review 2015: A Secure and Prosperous United Kingdom’. www.un.org/press/en/1999/19990920.sgsm7136.html [accessed 24/06/2019].Google Scholar

Hobbes, T. (2002). ‘The Project Gutenberg eBook of Leviathan’, available at www.gutenberg.org/files/3207/3207-h/3207-h.htmGoogle Scholar

Hoogensen Gjørv, G. (2012). ‘Security by any other name: Negative security, positive security, and a multi-actor security approach’, Review of International Studies, 38(4), 835–859.Google Scholar

House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee. (2016–17). ‘Libya: Examination of intervention and collapse and the UK’s future policy options Third Report of Session 2016–17’, London: House of Commons.Google Scholar

Howell, A., & Richter-Montpetit, M. (2020). ‘Is securitization theory racist? Civilizationism, methodological whiteness, and antiblack thought in the Copenhagen School’. Security Dialogue, 51(1), 3–22.Google Scholar

Hurrell, A. (2014). ‘Order and justice’ In Navari, Cornelia and Green, Daniel M. (eds.) Guide to the English school in international studies, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 143–158, chapter 9.Google Scholar

Huysmans, J. (2011). ‘What’s in an act? On security speech acts and little security nothings’, Security Dialogue, 42(4–5), 371–383.Google Scholar

ICISS. (2001). The responsibility to protect: Report of the international commission on intervention and state sovereignty. Ottawa: The International Development Research Centre.Google Scholar

IISS. (1992). ‘The challenge of self-determination’, Strategic Survey, 93 1992 – (1), 16–23.Google Scholar

Jackson, R. (2000). The global covenant: Human conduct in a world of states. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Janse, R. (2006). ‘The legitimacy of humanitarian interventions’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 19(3), 669–692.Google Scholar

Jenkins, S. (2017). ‘If we overreact to this attack on Paris then terrorism will “just never end”’ The Guardian, 21 April 2017.Google Scholar

Jeske, D. (2014). ‘Special obligations’ In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2014 Edition), plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/special-obligations/.Google Scholar

Johansen, R. C. (2006). ‘Proposal for a United Nations emergency peace service to prevent genocide and crimes against humanity’ In Johansen, Robert C. (ed.) A United Nations emergency peace service: To prevent genocide and crimes against humanity, New York: World Federalist Movement, pp. 23–42.Google Scholar

Kaldor, M. (2012). New and old wars 3rd edition, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Kasic, A. (2014). ‘Australia’s Border Control: The Anxiety of a Nation’, Unpublished Master’s Thesis available at: projekter.aau.dk/projekter/files/198384830/Thesis_Australia_s_Border_Control.pdf [accessed 24/07/2023].Google Scholar

Keating, T. (2012). ‘Mobilising the troops: Generating the political will to act’ In Knight, W. Andy and Egerton, Frazer (eds.) The Routledge handbook of the responsibility to protect, London: Routledge, pp. 115–125.Google Scholar

Kegley, C. W. and Wittkopf, E. R. (2001). World politics: Trend and transformation, 8th edition, Bedford/St.Martin’s: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar

Ki-Moon, B. (2009). Implementing the responsibility to protect Report of the Secretary-General, A/63/677, 12 January 2009.Google Scholar

Ki-Moon, B. (2012). Responsibility to protect: Timely and decisive response, Report of the Secretary-General A/66/874–S/2012/578, 25 July 2012.Google Scholar

Kleine, K. (2015). ‘Will R2P be ready when disaster strikes? – The rationale of the responsibility to protect in an environmental context’, The International Journal of Human Rights, 19(8), 1176–1189.Google Scholar

Kramer, M. and Harlan, J. (2019). ‘Parkland Shooting: Where Gun Control and School Safety Stand Today’ The New York Times, 13 February 2019 available at www.nytimes.com/2019/02/13/us/parkland-shooting.html [accessed 29/07/2019].Google Scholar

Kramer, M. and Itzkowitz Shifrinson, J. R. (2017). ‘Correspondence: NATO enlargement – Was there a promise?’, International Security, 42(1) (Summer 2017), 189–192.Google Scholar

Krieger, D., Mendlovitz, S., and Pace, W. (2006). ‘Introduction’ In Johansen, Robert C. (ed.) A United Nations emergency peace service: To prevent genocide and crimes against humanity, New York: World Federalist Movement, pp. 11–20.Google Scholar

Krieger, Z., &and Roth, A. I. (2007). ‘Nuclear weapons in neo-realist theory’, International Studies Review, 9(3), 369–384.Google Scholar

Ladenburg, T. (2007). ‘Woodrow Wilson and the League of Nations, Digital History’, available at www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/teachers/lesson_plans/pdfs/unit8_12.pdfGoogle Scholar

Lango, J. W. (2014). The ethics of armed conflict: A cosmopolitan just war theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Lazar, N. C. (2009). States of emergency in liberal democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lazar, S. (2012). ‘Necessity in self-defense and war’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 40(1), 3–44.Google Scholar

Linn, L. (2015). ‘Ebola Diaries: From Denial and Fear to Action’, available at www.who.int/features/2015/ebola-diaries-linn/en/ [accessed 11/02/2019].Google Scholar

Loader, I. (2022). ‘Not just securitization: On the limits of limiting security practices’, European Journal of International Security, 7, 252–256.Google Scholar

Luck, E. C. (2009). ‘Environmental Emergencies and the Responsibility to Protect: A Bridge Too Far?’, Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting (Vol. 103, pp. 32–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lukianoff, G. and Haidt, J. (2019). The coddling of the American mind: How good intentions and bad ideas are setting up a generation for failure. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Lyotard, J. F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Makahamadze, T. and Sibanda, F. (2021). ‘Gratuitous benefit for the ZANU-PF government? Securitisation of COVID-19 and authoritarian politics in Zimbabwe’, African Security Review, DOI: 10.1080/10246029.2021.1982739Google Scholar

Mahdavi, M. (2012). ‘R2P in the Middle East and North Africa’ In Knight, W. Andy and Egerton, Frazer (eds.) The Routledge handbook of the responsibility to protect, London: Routledge, pp. 257–275.Google Scholar

Mahdavi, M. (2015). ‘A postcolonial critique of responsibility to protect the Middle East’, Perceptions, xx(1), 7–36.Google Scholar

Malone, L. A. (2009). ‘Green helmets: Eco-intervention in the twenty-first century’, Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting, 103, 19–27.Google Scholar

Maquire, L. (2016). ‘Identity Politics’ Philosophy Talks’ available at www.philosophytalk.org/blog/identity-politics [accessed 24/07/2023].Google Scholar

Mareš, M. (2011). ‘Terrorism-free zone in East Central Europe? Strategic environment, risk tendencies, and causes of limited terrorist activities in the Visegrad Group countries’, Terrorism and Political Violence, 23(2), 233–253.Google Scholar

Martin, R. (2014). ‘Overlapping consensus’ In Mandle, John and Reidy, David (eds.) The Cambridge Rawls Lexicon, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 588–594.Google Scholar

McClean, E. (2014). ‘Hard evidence: Who uses veto in the UN Security Council most often – And for what?’ The Conversation, 31 July 2014.Google Scholar

McDonald, M. (2012). Security, the environment and emancipation: Contestation over environmental change. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

McGuire, B. (2016). ‘How Climate Change Triggers Earthquakes, Tsunamis and Volcanoes’, The Guardian, 16 October, available at www.theguardian.com/world/2016/oct/16/climate-change-triggers-earthquakes-tsunamis-volcanoes [accessed 24/07/2023].Google Scholar

McInnes, C. and Rushton, S. (2013). ‘HIV/AIDS and securitization theory’, European Journal of International Relations, 19(1), 115–138.Google Scholar

McLaughlin, K. (2017). ‘Jihadist Terrorists Have Long Had Spain in Their Sights – Here’s Why’ The Conversation, 18 August available at theconversation.com/jihadist-terrorists-have-long-had-spain-in-their-sights-heres-why-82703 [accessed 4/4/2019].Google Scholar

McMahan, J. (2004). ‘The ethics of killing in war’, Ethics, 114(4), Symposium on Terrorism, War, and Justice (July 2004), 693–733.Google Scholar

McMahan, J. (2005). ‘Just cause for war’, Ethics & International Affairs, 19(3), 1–21.Google Scholar

McMahan, J. (2006). ‘The ethics of killing in war’, Philosophia, 34, 23–41.Google Scholar

McMahan, J. (2008). ‘The morality of war and the law of war’ In Rodin, David and Shue, Henry (eds.) Just and unjust warriors: The moral and legal status of soldiers, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 19–43.Google Scholar

McMahan, J. (2009). Killing in war, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

McMahan, J. (2010). ‘Humanitarian intervention, consent, and proportionality’ In Davis, N. Ann, Keshen, Richard, and McMahan, Jeff (eds.) Ethics and humanity: themes from the philosophy of Jonathan Glover, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 45–73.Google Scholar

McMahan, J. (2018). ‘Foreword’ In May, Larry (eds.) The Cambridge handbook of the just war, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. ix–xiii.Google Scholar

McSweeney, B. (1996). ‘Identity and security: Buzan and the Copenhagen School’, Review of International Studies, 22(1), 81–93.Google Scholar

Mearsheimer, J. J. (2014). ‘Why the Ukraine crisis is the West’s fault: The liberal delusions that provoked Putin’, Foreign Affairs, 93, 77.Google Scholar

Medcalf, J. (2005). NATO: A beginner’s guide. Oxford: Oneworld.Google Scholar

Meierding, E. (2013). ‘Climate change and conflict: Avoiding small talk about the weather’, International Studies Review, 15(2), 185–203.Google Scholar

Memorandum on Security Assurances in Connection with Ukraine’s Accession to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. (1994). 5 December; available at www.pircenter.org/media/content/files/12/13943175580.pdf [accessed 17/10/2019].Google Scholar

Miller, D. (2001). ‘Distributing responsibilities’, The Journal of Political Philosophy, 9(4), 453–471.Google Scholar

Miller, D. (2007). National responsibility and global justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Miller, D. (2009). ‘The responsibility to protect human rights’ In Meyer, Lukas H. (ed.) Legitimacy, justice and public international law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 232–251.Google Scholar

Miller, D. (2016). Strangers in our midst: The political philosophy of immigration, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Morello, C. (2017). ‘U.S. Threatens Countries with Loss of Aid over U.N. Vote on Jerusalem’, The Washington Post, 20 December 2017, available at: www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/us-threatens-countries-with-loss-of-aid-over-un-jerusalem-vote/2017/12/20/3ddacadc-e5bc-11e7-833f-155031558ff4_story.html?utm_term=.ea2e73e6b9b7 [accessed 26/02/2019].Google Scholar

Morris, J. and Wheeler, N. (2016). ‘The responsibility not to veto: A responsibility too far?’ In Bellamy, Alex J. and Dunne, Tim (eds.) The Oxford handbook of the responsibility to protect, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 227–248.Google Scholar

Morkevicius, V. (2022). ‘How do Russia’s reasons for war stack up? An expert on “just war” explains’, The Conversation Published: March 5, 2022, 1.39pm GMTGoogle Scholar

Mueller, J. E. (2006). Overblown: How politicians and the terrorism industry inflate national security threats, and why we believe them. New York City: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Müller, G. and Ischinger, W. (2020). ‘Entwicklung und Sicherheit gehören zusammen’ FAZ, 14 February available at www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/sicherheitskonferenz/muenchner-sicherheitskonferenz-gastbeitrag-von-gerd-mueller-und-wolfgang-ischinger-16632571.html?GEPC=s5 [accessed 17.02.2020].Google Scholar

Mulgan, T. (2001). The demands of consequentialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nagel, T. (2005). ‘The problem of global justice’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 33(2), 113–147.Google Scholar

NATO. (2021a). ‘NATO 2030 Young Leaders’ Recommendations and Conversation with the Secretary General’, 4 Feb 2021, available at www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/opinions_181209.htm?selectedLocale=enGoogle Scholar

NATO. (2021b). ‘NATO in a Competitive World’, 5 October, available at www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/opinions_187140.htmGoogle Scholar

NATO. (1949/2019). ‘The North Atlantic Treaty’, 10 April 2019, available at www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/official_texts_17120.htm [accessed 25/09/2019].Google Scholar

NATO. (2019). ‘Relations with Sweden’ available at www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_52535.htm [accessed 9/08/2021].Google Scholar

NATO. (2018). ‘Resilience and Article 3’ 25 June 18 available at www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_132722.htm [accessed 1/05/2019].Google Scholar

NATO. (2010). ‘Strategic Concept “Active Engagement, Modern Defence”’ available at www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_82705.htm [accessed 12/04/2023].Google Scholar

Neal, A. (2013). ‘Legislative practices’ In Salter, Mark B. and Mutlu, Can E. (eds.) Research methods in critical security studies, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 125–128.Google Scholar

Neal, A. (2019). Security as politics: Beyond the state of exception. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Neocleous, M. (2008). Critique of security. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Nyman, J. (2018). The energy security paradox: Rethinking energy (in) security in the United States and China. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Oberman, K. (2015). ‘The myth of the optional war: Why states are required to wage the wars they are permitted to wage’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 43(4), 255–286.Google Scholar

O’Driscoll, C. and Lang, A. F. J. (2013). ‘The just war tradition and the practice of political authority’ In O’Driscoll, Cian, Lang, Antony F. Jr., and Williams, John. (eds.) Just war: Authority, tradition, and practice, Georgetown, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar

Official Journal of the European Union (2017). ‘Commission Recommendation (EU) 2017/1584 of 13 September 2017 on coordinated response to large-scale cybersecurity incidents and crises’, available at eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reco/2017/1584/ojGoogle Scholar

O’Neill, K. (2009). The environment and international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Orend, B. (2006). The morality of war. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press.Google Scholar

Orend, B. (2019). War and political theory. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Orford, A. (2012). ‘Constituting order’ In Crawford, James and Koskenniemi, Martti (eds.) The Cambridge companion to international law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 271–289.Google Scholar

Owens, D. (2015). ‘On Duty’, Philosophy Bites podcast, 2 September 2002, available at philosophybites.com/2015/09/david-owens-on-duty.htmlGoogle Scholar

Owens, P. (2012). ‘Human security and the rise of the social’, Review of International Studies, 38(3), 547–567.Google Scholar

Oxford Lib Guide. (2018). ‘United Kingdom Law: Case la’, available here ox.libguides.com/c.php?g=422832&p=2887381 [accessed 20/06/2019].Google Scholar

Panke, D. (2016). ‘Living in an imperfect world? Incomplete contracting & the rational Design of International Organizations’. Journal of International Organizations Studies, 7(1), 25–38.Google Scholar

Panke, D. (2017). ‘Regional actors in international security negotiations’, European Journal of Security Research, 2, 5–21.Google Scholar

Parfit, D. (2011). On what matters, Vol 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Parry, J. (2017a). ‘Legitimate authority and the ethics of war: A map of the terrain’, Ethics & International Affairs, 31(2), 169–189.Google Scholar

Parry, J. (2017b). ‘Defensive harm, consent, and intervention’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 45(4), 356–396.Google Scholar

Parry, J. (2022). ‘What’s wrong with paternalism?’ Jurisprudence Discussion Group, Oxford: Oxford University available at www.youtube.com/watch?v=IfLcAJbi6LAGoogle Scholar

Pattison, J. (2010). Humanitarian intervention and the responsibility to protect: Who should intervene?. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pattison, J. (2014). The morality of private war. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pattison, J. (2018). The alternatives to war. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pattison, J. (2022). ‘Beyond imperfection: The demands of the international responsibility to protect’, Global Responsibility to Protect, 14, 105–108.Google Scholar

Peeters, W., De Smet, A., Diependaele, L., Sterckx, S., McNeal, R. H., and De Smet, A. (2015). Climate change and individual responsibility: Agency, moral disengagement and the motivational gap. Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan.Google Scholar

Peter, F. (2017). ‘Political legitimacy’ In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/legitimacy/Google Scholar

Peters, A. (2009). ‘Treaty Making Powers’ Max Planck Encyclopaedia of Public International Law [MPEPIL], Oxford; Oxford Public International Law available at: opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1494Google Scholar

Philipsen, L. (2020). ‘Performative securitization: From conditions of success to conditions of possibility’, Journal of International Relations and Development, 23(1), 139–163.Google Scholar

Pinker, S. (2011). The better angels of our nature. New York, NY: Viking.Google Scholar

Pogge, T. (2007). John Rawls: His life and theory of justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pogge, T. W. (2001). ‘Eradicating systemic poverty: Brief for a global resources dividend’, Journal of Human Development, 2(1), 59–77.Google Scholar

Polko, P. and Ratajczak, S. (2021). ‘Vaccination as a matter of security and security management in European Union’, European Research Studies Journal, 24(Special 4), 446–456.Google Scholar

Pouliot, V. (2010). International security in practice: The politics of NATO-Russia diplomacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rachels, J. (1986). The elements of moral philosophy. New York: McGraw-Hill/Random.Google Scholar

Rafanelli, L. M. (2021). Promoting justice across borders: The ethics of reform intervention. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Rasmussen, A. (2016). ‘Crisis in Libya: Who’s to blame?’ | UpFront, available here www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZHB28DnXYU [accessed 9/11/23].Google Scholar

Rasmussen, A. (2019). ‘NATO Boss: Libya Still a “Model Intervention” available at: www.aljazeera.com/programmes/upfront/2016/10/nato-boss-libya-model-intervention-161022075802390.html [accessed 23/09/2019].Google Scholar

Rawls, J. (1996). Political liberalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Rawls, J. (1997). ‘The idea of public reason revisited’, The University of Chicago Law Review, Summer, 64(3), 765–807.Google Scholar

Rawls, J. (2001). The law of peoples. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Raz, J. (1986). The morality of freedom. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Ripstein, A. (1998). Equality, responsibility, and the law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Risse, M. (2012). On global justice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Roberts, A. and Kingsbury, B. (1993). ‘Introduction: The UN’s roles in international society since 1945’ In Roberts, Adam and Kingsbury, Benedict (eds.) United Nations, divided world: The UN’s roles in international relations, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 1–62.Google Scholar

Rodin, D. (2002). War & self-defense. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Roff, H. M. (2013). Global justice, Kant and the responsibility to protect. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Rotaru, V. (2020). ‘Silencing the contestant. Legitimizing Crimea’s annexation by mimicking the West’, European Security, 1, 96–118.Google Scholar

Rotberg, R. I. (2004). ‘The failure and collapse of nation-states: Breakdown, prevention, and repair’ In Rotberg, Robert (ed.) When states fail: Causes and consequences, Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 1–49.Google Scholar

Runciman, D. (2003). ‘Moral responsibility and the problem of representing the state’ In Erskine, Toni (ed.) Can institutions have responsibilities?, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 41–50.Google Scholar

Sagan, S. D. and Waltz, K. N. (2010). ‘Is nuclear zero the best option?’, The National Interest, (109), 88–96.Google Scholar

Sarat, A. (2010). ‘Introduction: Towards new conceptions of the relationship of law and sovereignty under conditions of emergency’ In Sarat, Austin (ed.) Sovereignty, emergency, legality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar

Scheid, D. E. (2014). ‘Introduction to armed humanitarian intervention’ In Scheid, Don E. (ed.) The ethics of armed humanitarian intervention, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–25.Google Scholar

Schimmelfennig, F. (2001). ‘The community trap: Liberal norms, rhetorical action, and the Eastern enlargement of the European Union’, International Organization, 55(1), 47–80.Google Scholar

Scott, L. (2020). ‘International history in the twentieth century’ In Baylis, John, Smith, Steve, and Owens, Patricia (eds.) The globalisation of world politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 54–69.Google Scholar

Selby, J., Daoust, G., and Hoffman, C. (2022). Divided environments: An international political ecology of climate change, water and security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Shea, J. (2019). ‘NATO at 70: An Opportunity to Recalibrate’ Nato Review 5.04.2019, available here: www.nato.int/docu/review/2019/Also-in-2019/nato-at-70-an-opportunity-to-recalibrate/EN/index.htm [accessed 25/07/2019].Google Scholar

Shue, H. (2018). ‘Last resort and proportionality’ In Lazar, Seth and Frowe, Helen (eds). The Oxford handbook of the ethics of war, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 260–276.Google Scholar

Singer, P. (1972). ‘Famine, affluence, and morality’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 1(3), 229–243.Google Scholar

Singer, P. (2013). ‘The Why and How of Effective Altruism’ TED Talk available here www.ted.com/talks/peter_singer_the_why_and_how_of_effective_altruism [accessed 08/04/2019].Google Scholar

Smith, D. (2018). ‘Trump Grants Troops Guarding Border Authority to Use “Lethal Force” – Report’ The Guardian, 21 November 2018, available at: www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/nov/21/trump-us-mexico-border-troops-decision-memorandum-force-report [accessed 18/02/2019].Google Scholar

Soanes, C. (2000). The compact English dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sorell, T. (2013). Emergencies and politics: A sober Hobbesian approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sperling, J. and Webber, M. (2017). ‘NATO and the Ukraine crisis: Collective securitisation’, European Journal of International Security, 2(1), 19–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sperling, J. and Webber, M. (2019). ‘The European Union: Security governance and collective securitisation’, West European Politics, 42(2), 228–260.Google Scholar

Statman, D. (2008). ‘On the success condition for legitimate self-defense’, Ethics, 118(4), 659–686.Google Scholar

Steinberger, P. J. (2002). ‘Hobbesian resistance’, American Journal of Political Science, 46(4), 856–865.Google Scholar

Stoltenberg, J. (2020). ‘Remarks on Launching #NATO2030 – Strengthening the Alliance in an Increasingly Competitive World’, 8 June 2020, available at www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/opinions_176197.htmGoogle Scholar

Stritzel, H. (2007). ‘Towards a theory of securitization: Copenhagen and beyond’, European Journal of International Relations, 13(3), 357–383.Google Scholar

Tesón, F. R. (2014). ‘The moral basis of armed humanitarian intervention’ In Scheid, Don E. (eds.) The ethics of armed humanitarian intervention, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 61–77.Google Scholar

Tesón, F. R., and Van der Vossen, B. (2017). Debating humanitarian intervention: Should we try to save strangers?. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Thakur, R. (2017). The United Nations, peace and security: From collective security to the responsibility to protect, second edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

The General Secretariat of the Council (GSC). (2020). ‘EU at the UN General Assembly’ available at www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/unga/ [accessed 4/02/20].Google Scholar

Thumfart, J. (2022). ‘The (Il)Legitimacy of cybersecurity. An application of just securitization theory to cybersecurity based on the principle of subsidiarity (November 17, 2022)’, Applied Cybersecurity & Internet Governance, 1(1), 97–120.Google Scholar

Topgyal, T. (2016). ‘The Tibetan self-immolations as counter-securitization: Towards an inter-unit theory of securitization’, Asian Security, 12(3), 166–187.Google Scholar

Trahan, J. (2020). Existing legal limits to security council veto power in the face of atrocity crimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Trahan, J. (2022). ‘Why the veto power is not unlimited: A response to critiques of, and questions about, existing legal limits to the veto power in the face of atrocity crimes’, Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 54, 109 (2022). Available at: scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/jil/vol54/iss1/9Google Scholar

Trump, D. J. (2017). National security strategy of the United States of America. Executive Office of The President Washington DC Washington United States.Google Scholar

UN. (2005). ‘Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties 1969’ available at legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/1_1_1969.pdf [accessed 05/02/2020].Google Scholar

UN. (2019). ‘UN Charter’ (full text) available at www.un.org/en/sections/un-charter/un-charter-full-text/ [accessed 15/07/2019].Google Scholar

UNA. (2015). ‘UN Security Council and the Responsibility to Protect: Voluntary Restraint of the Veto in Situations of Mass Atrocity Briefing by UNA – UK’, October 2015, available at una.org.uk/sites/default/files/Veto%20R2P%20code%20of%20conduct%20briefing%20October%202015%20update_0.pdf [accessed 9/08/2021].Google Scholar

UN University. (2013). ‘David Miller – Extent and Limits of Global Justice’ available at: www.youtube.com/watch?v=8RkoKxuCUvU [accessed 25/09/2019].Google Scholar

UNFCCC. (2018). ‘The Paris Agreement’, 22 October 2018, available at unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/the-paris-agreement [accessed 26/02/2019].Google Scholar

UNGA. (2005). ‘Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005’ available at www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_RES_60_1.pdf [accessed 25/06/2019].Google Scholar

Varden, H. (2011). ‘Duties, positive and negative’ In Chatterjee, Deen K. (ed.) Encyclopedia of global justice, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 281–283.Google Scholar

Vuori, J. (2008). ‘Illocutionary logic and strands of securitization: Applying the theory of securitization to the study of non-democratic political orders’, European Journal of International Relations, 14, 65–99.Google Scholar

Wæver, O. (1989). ‘Security, The Speech Act: Analysing the Politics of a Word’ unpublished paper, presented at the Research Training Seminar, Sostrup Manor, revised Jerusalem/Tel Aviv 25–26 June 1989.Google Scholar

Wæver, O. (1995). ‘Securitization and desecuritization’ In Lipschutz, Ronnie D. (ed.) On security, New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 46–86.Google Scholar

Wæver, O. (2003). ‘Securitisation: Taking stock of a Research Programme in Security Studies’, unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar

Wæver, O. (2008). ‘The changing agenda of societal security’ In Brauch, H. G., et al., (eds.) Globalization and environmental challenges, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 581–593.Google Scholar

Wæver, O. (2011). ‘Politics, security, theory’, Security Dialogue, 42(4–5), 465–480.Google Scholar

Wæver, O. (2015). ‘The theory act: Responsibility and exactitude as seen from securitization’ International Relations, 29(1), 121–127.Google Scholar

Wæver, O. (2017). ‘Afterword: The Arctic security constellation’, Politik, 20(3). doi.org/10.7146/politik.v20i3.97157Google Scholar

Wæver, O. and Buzan, B. (2020). ‘Racism and responsibility – The critical limits of deepfake methodology in security studies: A reply to Howell and Richter-Montpetit’, Security Dialogue, 51(4), 386–394. doi: 10.1177/0967010620916153.Google Scholar

Walker, S. (2018). ‘Hungary to Criminalise Migrant Helpers with “Stop Soros” Legislation’, The Guardian, 29 May 2018, available at: www.theguardian.com/world/2018/may/29/hungary-criminalises-migrant-helpers-stop-george-soros-legislation [accessed 20/02/2019].Google Scholar

Wallander, C. A. (2018). ‘NATO’s enemies within: How democratic decline could destroy the alliance’, Foreign Affairs, 97, 70.Google Scholar

Walt, S. (2019). ‘Who Will Save the Amazon (and How)?’ Foreign Policy, 5 August 2019, available at foreignpolicy.com/2019/08/05/who-will-invade-brazil-to-save-the-amazon/ [accessed 5/6/2020].Google Scholar

Walzer, M. (1990). ‘The communitarian critique of liberalism’. Political Theory, 18(1), 6–23. www.jstor.org/stable/191477Google Scholar

Walzer, M. (2006 [1977]). Just and unjust wars: A moral argument with historical illustrations, fourth edition, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Watts, J. (2016). ‘Zika Virus Command Center leads Biggest Military Operation in Brazil’s History’ The Guardian 30 March 2016 www.theguardian.com/world/2016/mar/30/brazil-zika-war-virus-military-operation [accessed 25/02/2019].Google Scholar

Webber, M. (2009). ‘Thinking NATO through Theoretically’ Paper presented to the ECPR Joint Sessions, Lisbon 14–19 April 2009-04-08 Workshop 24: ‘Theorizing NATO’Google Scholar

Weber, M. (1946). Politics as Vocation available at polisci2.ucsd.edu/foundation/documents/03Weber1918.pdf [accessed 7/03/2019].Google Scholar

Weinberg, J. (2011). ‘Is government supererogation possible?’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 92, 263–281.Google Scholar

Weiss, T. G. (2006). ‘R2P after 9/11 and the World Summit’, Wisconsin, International Law Journal, 24, 741.Google Scholar

Weiss, T. G. (2016). What’s wrong with the United Nations and how to fix it, 3rd edition, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Weiss, T. G. and Thakur, R. (2010). Global governance and the UN: A unfinished journey. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Wellman, C. H. and Cole, P. (2011). Debating the ethics of immigration: Is there a right to exclude?. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Welsh, J. (2012). ‘Who should act? Collective responsibility and the responsibility to protect’ In Knight, W. Andy and Egerton, Frazer (eds.) The Routledge handbook of the responsibility to protect, London: Routledge, pp. 103–114.Google Scholar

Welsh, J. (2013). ‘The Evolution of the Responsibility to Protect: Securing Individuals in a World of States’ Centre for International Governance Innovation available at: www.youtube.com/watch?v=P3WJZND3z8M [accessed 07/10/2019].Google Scholar

Welsh, J. (2016). ‘R2P’s next ten years: Deepening and extending the consensus’ In Bellamy, Alex J. and Dunne, Tim (eds.) The Oxford handbook of the responsibility to protect, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 984–999.Google Scholar

Welsh, J. M. (2019). ‘Norm robustness and the responsibility to protect’, Journal of Global Security Studies, 4(1), 53–72.Google Scholar

Wenar, L. (2021). ‘John Rawls’ In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.) The Stanford encyclopaedia of philosophy (Summer 2021 Edition), plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/rawls/.Google Scholar

West, D. M. (2016). ‘Internet Shutdowns Cost Countries $2.4 Billion Last Year, Center for Technology Innovation at Brookings’, available at www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/intenet-shutdowns-v-3.pdf [accessed 18/02/2019].Google Scholar

Wheeler, N. J. (2018). Trusting enemies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wheeler, N. and Dunne, T. (2012). ‘Operationalising protective intervention: Alternative models of authorisation’ In Knight, W. Andy and Egerton, Frazer (eds.) The Routledge handbook of the responsibility to protect, London: Routledge, pp. 87–102.Google Scholar

Wheeler, N. J. and Dunne, T.. (1998). ‘Good international citizenship: A third way for British foreign policy’, International Affairs, 74(4), 847–870.Google Scholar

WHO. (2012). ‘Global Strategy for Dengue Prevention and Control 2012–2020’ available at: afro.who.int/sites/default/files/2017-06/9789241504034_eng.pdf [accessed 25/02/2019].Google Scholar

WHO. (2017). ‘Vector Borne Diseases, 31 October 2017’, available at: www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/vector-borne-diseases [accessed 20/02/2019].Google Scholar

WHO. (2018). ‘Dengue: A Mosquito-Borne Disease’ available at: www.who.int/bangladesh/news/detail/28-05-2018-dengue-a-mosquito-borne-disease [accessed 10/04/2023].Google Scholar

WHO. (2023). DROUGHT available at: [accessed 10/04/2023].Google Scholar

Whyte, C. and Mazanec, B. (2018). Understanding cyber warfare: Politics, policy and strategy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Williams, G. L. and Jones, B. J. (2001). ‘Collective security or collective defence?’ In Williams, Geoffrey Lee and Jones, Barkley Jared (eds.) NATO and the transatlantic alliance in the 21st century, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 87–96.Google Scholar

Williams, J. (2015). Ethics, diversity & world politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wolfendale, J. (2017). ‘Defining war’ In Gross, Michael L. and Meisels, Tamar (eds.) Soft war: The ethics of unarmed conflict, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 16–32.Google Scholar

Wolfendale, J. (2022). White supremacy as an existential threat: A response to Rita Floyd’s The morality of security: A theory of just securitization, European Journal of International Security, 7(2), May 2022, 248–282. DOI: doi.org/10.1017/eis.2022.3.Google Scholar

Woollard, F. (2015). Doing & allowing harm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Woollard, F. (2016). ‘Doing and allowing’, Oxford Bibliographies, 1. DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780195396577-0304Google Scholar

Woocher, L. (2012). ‘The responsibility to prevent’ In Knight, W. Andy and Egerton, Frazer (eds.) The Routledge handbook of the responsibility to protect, London: Routledge, pp. 22–35.Google Scholar

Young, S. P. (2006). ‘Rawlsian reasonableness: A problematic presumption?’, Canadian Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 159–180.Google Scholar

Zedner, L. (2009). Security. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Zimmerman, M. J. (2010). ‘Responsibility: Act and omission’ In Skorupski, John (ed.) The Routledge companion to ethics, London: Routledge, pp. 607–616.Google Scholar