Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Dedication
- Acknowledgments
- Chapter 1 What Can we Learn from Louis Dumont?
- Chapter 2 A Contrarian's Most Contrarian Notion: Dumont on Hierarchy
- Chapter 3 Our Individualism and Its Religious Origins
- Chapter 4 The Comparative Risks of Comparison: On Not “Remaining Caged within Our Own Frame of Reference”
- Chapter 5 Conclusion: Dumont's Morality and Social Cosmology
- References
- Index
Chapter 3 - Our Individualism and Its Religious Origins
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Dedication
- Acknowledgments
- Chapter 1 What Can we Learn from Louis Dumont?
- Chapter 2 A Contrarian's Most Contrarian Notion: Dumont on Hierarchy
- Chapter 3 Our Individualism and Its Religious Origins
- Chapter 4 The Comparative Risks of Comparison: On Not “Remaining Caged within Our Own Frame of Reference”
- Chapter 5 Conclusion: Dumont's Morality and Social Cosmology
- References
- Index
Summary
Louis Dumont, key theorist of the individual and individualism
Unlike some thinkers who feel compelled to declare their moral alignment with the ideas they explore, Dumont generally tries to short-circuit moralizing the subjects of his writing. This is not always possible, nor perhaps even desirable—even for Dumont—but it is how he conducts himself as a scholar and author. One of Dumont's sharpest critics, Robert Parkin, put this stance in the following way. In his work on morally delicate subjects such as hierarchy or individualism, Dumont has consistently refused to strike a moralistic pose, instead
always placing the understanding of caste before its moral evaluation. As a result, his work on both hierarchy and individualism have attracted not merely intellectual scepticism but a degree of hostility too, often on nonacademic grounds. This is perhaps not entirely surprising. Homo Hierarchicus, which not only seeks to understand hierarchy in its own terms even suggests its necessity in the sense of its unavoidability.…
(Parkin 2003, 116)Dumont's reluctance readily to moralize the notion of hierarchy by condemning it—part of the transgressive thrust of his work, as I have argued—is at the root of the irritation and outrage against Dumont expressed by such critics as Gerald Berreman, as we have noted.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Dumont on ReligionDifference, Comparison, Transgression, pp. 51 - 88Publisher: Acumen PublishingPrint publication year: 2008