Adams, D. (2021). Child Welfare Paramountcy: The Donor Conception Paradox. Bedford Park, South Australia: Flinders University.Google Scholar

Adams, D. H. (2013). Conceptualising a child-centric paradigm. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 10(3), 369–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-013-9454-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Adams, D., & Allan, S. (2013). Building a family tree: donor-conceived people, DNA tracing and donor ‘anonymity’. Australian Journal of Adoption, 7(2), 1–16.Google Scholar

Adams, D., & Lorbach, C. (2012). Accessing donor conception information in Australia: a call for retrospective access. Journal of Law and Medicine, 19(4), 707–721. PMID: 22908615.Google Scholar

Allan, S. (2011). Psycho-social, ethical and legal arguments for and against the retrospective release of information about donors to donor-conceived individuals in Australia. Journal of Law and Medicine, 19(2), 354–376.Google Scholar

Allan, S. (2016). Donor Conception and the Search for Information: From Secrecy and Anonymity to Openness. Abingdon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315568171Google Scholar

Blyth, E., Crawshaw, M., Frith, L., & Jones, C. (2012). Donor-conceived people’s views and experiences of their genetic origins: a critical analysis of the research evidence. Journal of Law and Medicine, 19(4), 769.Google Scholar

Blyth, E., & Farrand, A. (2004). Anonymity in donor-assisted conception and the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 12, 89.Google Scholar

Blyth, E., & Frith, L. (2015). Access to genetic and biographical history in donor conception: an analysis of recent trends and future possibilities. In Horsey, K. (Ed.), Revisiting the Regulation of Human Fertilisation and Embryology (pp. 136–152). Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bourne, K., Johnson, L., Anderson, C., & Hunter, E. (2018). Donor applications to the Victorian central register. In The ART of Caring Book of Abstracts (p. 63). Australia: Fertility Society of Australia.Google Scholar

Chicoine, S. (2020). The birth of fertility fraud: how to protect Washingtonians. Washington Law Review Online, 95, 168.Google Scholar

Cooke, M. (2019) Ohio family devastated by IVF terror. BioEdge (accessed 6 October 2021) www.bioedge.org/bioethics/ohio-family-devastated-by-ivf-error/13166.Google Scholar

Council of Europe (2019) Anonymous Donation of Sperm and Oocytes: Balancing the Rights of Parents, Donors and Children. Strasbourg: Parliamentary Assembly. http://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTML-EN.asp?fileid=27680Google Scholar

Crawshaw, M., & Dally, J. (2012). Producing sperm, egg and embryo donors’ pen portraits and other personal information for later use by donor offspring: an exploratory study of professional practices. Human Fertility, 15(2), 82–88. https://doi.org/10.3109/14647273.2012.68712Google Scholar

Crawshaw, M., & Daniels, K. (2019). Revisiting the use of ‘counselling’ as a means of preparing prospective parents to meet the emerging psychosocial needs of families that have used gamete donation. Families, Relationships and Societies, 8(3), 395–409. https://doi.org/10.1332/204674318X15313158773308Google Scholar

Crawshaw, M., Daniels, K., Adams, D., Bourne, K., van Hooff, J. A. P., Kramer, W., … & Thorn, P. (2015). Emerging models for facilitating contact between people genetically related through donor conception: a preliminary analysis and discussion. Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online, 1(2), 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2015.10.001Google Scholar

Crawshaw, M., Frith, L., van den Akker, O., & Blyth, E. (2016). Voluntary DNA-based information exchange and contact services following donor conception: an analysis of service users’ needs. New Genetics and Society, 35(4), 372–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636778.2016.1253462.Google Scholar

Crawshaw, M. (2018). Direct-to-consumer DNA testing: the fallout for individuals and their families unexpectedly learning of their donor conception origins. Human Fertility, 21(4), 225–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2017.1339127Google Scholar

Daniels, K. R. (2004). Building a Family with the Assistance of Donor Insemination. Palmerston North, NZ: Dunmore Press.Google Scholar

Darroch, F. and Smith, I. (2021) Establishing identity: how direct-to-consumer genetic testing challenges the assumption of donor anonymity. Family Court Review, 59(1), 103–120.Google Scholar

Dingle, C. (2021). Brave New Humans – The Dirty Reality of Donor Conception. London: Hardie Grant Books.Google Scholar

Donovan, C. (2006). Genetics, fathers, and families: exploring the implications of changing the law in favour of identifying sperm donors. Social & Legal Studies, 15(4), 494–510. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0964663906069543Google Scholar

Finkler, K. (2000). The New Genetics: Family and Kinship on the Medical Frontier. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Fox, D., Cohen, I. G., & Adashi, E. Y. (2019). Fertility fraud, legal firsts, and medical ethics. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 134(5), 918–920. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003516Google Scholar

Frith, L. (2001). Beneath the rhetoric: the role of rights in the practice of non‐anonymous gamete donation. Bioethics, 15(5–6), 473–484. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8519.00255.Google Scholar

Frith, L. (2001a). Gamete donation and anonymity: the ethical and legal debate. Human Reproduction, 16(5), 818–824. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/16.5.818CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Frith, L. (2015). The limits of evidence: evidence-based policy and the removal of gamete donor anonymity in the UK. Monash Bioethics Review, 33(1), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-015-0017-zGoogle Scholar

Frith, L., Blyth, E., Crawshaw, M., & van den Akker, O. (2018). Secrets and disclosure in donor conception. Sociology of Health & Illness, 40(1), 188–203.Google Scholar

Gilman, L., & Nordqvist, P. (2018). Organizing openness: how UK policy defines the significance of information and information sharing about gamete donation. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 32(3), 316–333. https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/eby014.Google Scholar

Gollancz, D. (2020, 17 December) The right to establish identity: donor-offspring. UK Human Rights Blog. https://ukhumanrightsblog.com/2020/12/17/the-right-to-establish-identity-donor-offspring-david-gollancz/Google Scholar

Guardian, The. (2022, 20 May), UK fertility watchdog could recommend scrapping donor anonymity law. www.theguardian.com/society/2022/may/20/uk-fertility-watchdog-could-recommend-scrapping-donor-anonymity-lawGoogle Scholar

Guerrini, C. J., Robinson, J. O., Bloss, C. C., Brooks, W. B., Fullerton, S. M., Kirkpatrick, B., … & McGuire, A. L. (2022). Family secrets: experiences and outcomes of participating in direct-to-consumer genetic relative-finder services. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 109(3), 486–497.Google Scholar

Harper, J. C., Kennett, D., & Reisel, D. (2016). The end of donor anonymity: how genetic testing is likely to drive anonymous gamete donation out of business. Human Reproduction, 31(6), 1135–1140. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew06Google Scholar

Hertz, R., & Nelson, M. K. (2018). Random Families: Genetic Strangers, Sperm Donor Siblings, and the Creation of New Kin. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Huffman, C. S., & Smith, M. (2021, May 14). Dallas woman advocates expanding fertility fraud law. WFAA. www.wfaa.com/article/news/local/investigates/dallas-woman-eve-wiley-advocates-expanding-fertility-fraud-law/287-5ad8424f-ed1f-4b48-9f5c-b3df1ed6cbc4.)Google Scholar

Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. (2019). Code of Practice. https://portal.hfea.gov.uk/media/1605/2019-12-03-code-of-practice-december-2019.pdfGoogle Scholar

Indekeu, A., Bolt, S. H., & Maas, A. J. B. (2021). Meeting multiple same-donor offspring: psychosocial challenges. Human Fertility, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2021.1872804Google Scholar

Indekeu, A., & Hens, K. (2019). Part of my story: the meaning and experiences of genes and genetics for sperm donor-conceived offspring. New Genetics and Society, 38(1), 18–37.Google Scholar

Isaksson, S., Sydsjö, G., Svanberg, A. S., & Lampic, C. (2019). Managing absence and presence of child–parent resemblance: a challenge for heterosexual couples following sperm donation. Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online, 8, 38–46. https://doi.org/10.org/j.rbms.2019.07.001Google Scholar

Ishii, T., & de Miguel Beriain, I. (2022). Shifting to a model of donor conception that entails a communication agreement among the parents, donor, and offspring. BMC Medical Ethics, 23(1), 18.Google Scholar

ISOGG (2021, 28 September) DNA testing for the donor conceived. International Society for Genetic Genealogists Wiki. https://isogg.org/wiki/DNA_testing_for_the_donor_conceivedGoogle Scholar

Jadva, V., Freeman, T., Kramer, W., & Golombok, S. (2010). Experiences of offspring searching for and contacting their donor siblings and donor. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 20(4), 523–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.01.001Google Scholar

Johns, R. (2013). Abolishing anonymity: a rights-based approach to evaluating anonymous sperm donation. UCLA Women’s Law Journal, 20, 111.Google Scholar

Kirkman-Brown, J, Calhaz-Jorge, C, Dancet, E, Lundin, K, Martins, M, … Frith, L. (2022). Good practice recommendations for information provision for those involved in reproductive donation. Human Reproduction Open, (1), https://doi.org/doi:10.1093/hropen/hoac001Google Scholar

Klotz, M. (2014). (K) Information: Gamete Donation and Kinship Knowledge in Germany and Britain (Vol. 32). Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar

Klotz, M. (2016). Wayward relations: novel searches of the donor-conceived for genetic kinship. Medical Anthropology, 35(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740.2015.1012615Google Scholar

Lippman, A. (1991). Prenatal genetic testing and screening: constructing needs and reinforcing inequities. American Journal of Law & Medicine, 17(1–2), 15–50. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0098858800007917Google Scholar

Londini, V. (2019). The open future of donor conception. BioNews. www.bionews.org.uk/page_143093Google Scholar

McGovern, P. G., & Schlaff, W. D. (2018). Sperm donor anonymity: a concept rendered obsolete by modern technology. Fertility and Sterility, 109(2), 230–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.12.011Google Scholar

Moore, C. (2016). The history of genetic genealogy and unknown parentage research: An insider’s view. Journal of Genetic Genealogy, 8(1), 35–37.Google Scholar

O’Brien, M. (2021, 17 July) Who has the largest DNA database? Data Mining DNA. www.dataminingdna.com/who-has-the-largest-dna-database/Google Scholar

Odze, L. (2018) Surrogacy and risks of family secrets. In Cabeza, R., Flowers, V., Pierrot, E., Rao, A., O’Leary, B. and Odze, L (Eds.), Surrogacy: Law, Practice and Policy in England and Wales (pp. 133–160). Bristol: LexisNexis.Google Scholar

Ojomu, N. (2019, 13 January) Man’s horror as DNA test reveals he’s dating his half-sister. Yahoo!Lifestyle. https://au.lifestyle.yahoo.com/mans-horror-dna-test-reveals-hes-dating-half-sister-044310902.htmlGoogle Scholar

Pennings, G. (2019). Genetic databases and the future of donor anonymity. Human Reproduction, 34(5), 786–790.Google Scholar

Peterson, P. (2019, 26 June). He found out he had 32 siblings. For The Times magazine, he took their pictures. The New York Times. www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/06/26/magazine/sperm-donor-siblings.htmlGoogle Scholar

Ravelingien, A., & Pennings, G. (2013). The right to know your genetic parents: from open-identity gamete donation to routine paternity testing. The American Journal of Bioethics, 13(5), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2013.776128.Google Scholar

Ravitsky, V. (2017). The right to know one’s genetic origins and cross-border medically assisted reproduction. Israel Journal of Health Policy Research, 6(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13584-016-0125-0Google Scholar

Sforza, T. (2007). Fertility fraud settlements cost millions. The Orange County Register, 26 June.Google Scholar

Shapiro, D. (2019). Inheritance: A Memoir of Genealogy, Paternity, and Love. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar

Sharak, S. (2020). Richards v. Kiken and the legal implications of fertility fraud. American Journal of Law & Medicine, 46(4), 528–535.Google Scholar

Smart, C. (2011). Families, secrets and memories. Sociology, 45(4), 539–553. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0038038511406585Google Scholar

Strathern, M. (1999). Refusing information. In Strathern, M. (Ed.), Property, Substance, and Effect: Anthropological Essays on Persons and Things (pp. 64–86). London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar

Tobin, J. W. (2012). Donor conceived individuals and access to information about their genetic origins: the relevance and role of rights. Journal of Law and Medicine, 19(4), 742–757.Google Scholar

Tallandini, M. A., Zanchettin, L., Gronchi, G., & Morsan, V. (2016). Parental disclosure of assisted reproductive technology (ART) conception to their children: a systematic and meta-analytic review. Human Reproduction, 31(6), 1275–1287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

van den Akker, O. (2010). Nature and nurture: what do theory and research tell us. In Crawshaw, M. and Balen, R. (Eds.), Adopting after Infertility: Messages from Practice, Research, and Personal Experience (pp. 164–179). London: Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar

WADC. (2017) We are donor conceived 2017 survey results. We Are Donor Conceived. www.wearedonorconceived.com/uncategorized/survey-results/Google Scholar

WADC. (2020) We are donor conceived survey report. We Are Donor Conceived. www.wearedonorconceived.com/2020-survey-top/2020-we-are-donor-conceived-survey/Google Scholar

Weiner, K., Martin, P., Richards, M., & Tutton, R. (2017). Have we seen the geneticisation of society? Expectations and evidence. Sociology of Health & Illness, 39(7), 989–1004. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12551.Google Scholar

Wincott, E., & Crawshaw, M. (2006). From a social issue to policy: social work’s advocacy for the rights of donor conceived people to genetic origins information in the United Kingdom. Social Work in Health Care, 43(2–3), 53–72. DOI: 10.1300/J010v43n02_05Google Scholar

Allan, S. (2016). Donor Conception and the Search for Information: From Secrecy and Anonymity to Openness. Routledge.Google Scholar

Australian Broadcasting Company. (2015). The Donor Detectives, Background Briefing (available at: www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/backgroundbriefing/the-donor-detectives/6996896).Google Scholar

Cosson, B., Dempsey, D., & Kelly, F. (2021). Secret shame – male infertility and donor conception in the wake of retrospective legislative change. Men and Masculinities, 25(2), 497–515.Google Scholar

Crawshaw, M., Daniels, K., Adams, D., Bourne, K., van Hooff, J. A. P., Kramer, W., … & Thorn, P. (2015). Emerging models for facilitating contact between people genetically related through donor conception: a preliminary analysis and discussion. Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online, 1(2), 71–80.Google Scholar

Dempsey, D., Kelly, F., Horsfall, B., Hammarberg, K., Bourne, K., & Johnson, L. (2019). Applications to statutory donor registers in Victoria, Australia: information sought and expectations of contact. Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online, 9, 28–36.Google Scholar

Dingle, S. (2021). Brave New Humans: The Dirty Truth behind the Fertility Industry. Hardie Grant Books.Google Scholar

Freeman, T., Zadeh, S., Smith, V., & Golombok, S. (2016). Disclosure of sperm donation: a comparison between solo mother and two-parent families with identifiable donors. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 33(5), 592–600.Google Scholar

Goldberg, A. E., & Scheib, J. E. (2015). Female-partnered and single women’s contact motivations and experiences with donor-linked families. Human Reproduction, 30(6), 1375–1385.Google Scholar

Golombok, S., & Wilkinson, S. (Eds.), (2016). Regulating Reproductive Donation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Harper, J. C., Kennett, D., & Reisel, D. (2016). The end of donor anonymity: how genetic testing is likely to drive anonymous gamete donation out of business. Human Reproduction, 31(6), 1135–1140.Google Scholar

Hertz, R., & Nelson, M. K. (2018). Random Families: Genetic Strangers, Sperm Donor Siblings, and the Creation of New Kin. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hertz, R., Nelson, M. K., & Kramer, W. (2013). Donor conceived offspring conceive of the donor: the relevance of age, awareness, and family form. Social Science & Medicine, 86, 52–65.Google Scholar

Kelly, F. J., & Dempsey, D. J. (2016). Experiences and motives of Australian single mothers by choice who make early contact with their child’s donor relatives. Medical Law Review, 24(4), 571–590.Google Scholar

Kelly, F., Dempsey, D., Power, J., Bourne, K., Hammarberg, K., & Johnson, L. (2019). From stranger to family or something in between: donor linking in an era of retrospective access to anonymous sperm donor records in Victoria, Australia. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 33(3), 277–297.Google Scholar

Kelly, F., Dempsey, D., & Frew, C. (2019). The donor-linking practices of Australian fertility clinics. Journal of Law and Medicine, 27(2), 355–368.Google Scholar

National Health and Medical Research Council. (2017). Ethical Guidelines on the Use of Assisted Reproductive Technology in Clinical Practice and Research.Google Scholar

Victorian Assisted Reproductive Treatment Authority. (2018/19). Annual Report.Google Scholar

We Are Donor Conceived. (2020). 2020 Survey Report (available at: www.wearedonorconceived.com/2020-survey-top/2020-we-are-donor-conceived-survey/).Google Scholar

Bolt, S., Postema, D., van der Heij, A., & Maas, A. J. B. (2019). Anonymous Dutch Sperm Donors Releasing Their Identity. Human Fertility.Google Scholar

Costa, E. (2018). Affordances-in-practice: An ethnographic critique of social media logic and context collapse. New Media & Society, 20(10), 3641–3656. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818756290Google Scholar

Dempsey, D., & Kelly, F. (2017). Transnational third-party assisted conception: pursuing the desire for ‘origins’ information in the internet era. In Davies, M. (ed.) Babies for Sale? Transnational Surrogacy, Human Rights and the Politics of Reproduction, 204–217. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350218567.ch-011Google Scholar

Dempsey, D., Nordqvist, P., & Kelly, F. (2021). Beyond secrecy and openness: Telling a relational story about children’s best interests in donor-conceived families. BioSocieties, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41292-021-00225-9Google Scholar

Duffy, B. E., & Chan, N. K. (2019). ‘You never really know who’s looking’: Imagined surveillance across social media platforms. New Media & Society, 21(1), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818791318Google Scholar

Duguay, S. (2016). ‘He has a way gayer Facebook than I do’: Investigating sexual identity disclosure and context collapse on a social networking site. New Media & Society, 18(6), 891–907. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814549930Google Scholar

Gangneux, J. (2021). ‘It is an attitude’: The normalisation of social screening via profile checking on social media. Information, Communication & Society, 24(7), 994–1008. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1668460Google Scholar

Gershon, I. (2018). Every click you make, I’ll be watching you: Facebook stalking and neoliberal information. In A Networked Self and Birth, Life, Death, edited by Papacharissi, Zizi (pp. 104–120). Routledge.Google Scholar

Jadva, V., Freeman, T., Kramer, W., & Golombok, S. (2010). Experiences of offspring searching for and contacting their donor siblings and donor. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 20(4), 523–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.01.001Google Scholar

Kelly, F., & Dempsey, D. (2016). The family law implications of early contact between sperm donors and their donor offspring. Family Matters, 98, 54–63.Google Scholar

Kelly, F., Dempsey, D., Power, J., Bourne, K., Hammarberg, K., & Johnson, L. (2019). From stranger to family or something in between: Donor linking in an era of retrospective access to anonymous sperm donor records in Victoria, Australia. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 33(3), 277–297. https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebz011Google Scholar

Marwick, A. E., & Boyd, D. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114–133.’ https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313Google Scholar

Newton, G., & Southerton, C. (2021). Situated talk: A method for a reflexive encounter with# donorconceived on TikTok. Media International Australia, 186(1), 66–80.Google Scholar

Standlee, A. (2019). Friendship and online filtering: The use of social media to construct offline social networks. New Media & Society, 21(3), 770–785. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818806844Google Scholar

Van den Akker, O. B. A., Crawshaw, M. A., Blyth, E. D., & Frith, L. J. (2015). Expectations and experiences of gamete donors and donor-conceived adults searching for genetic relatives using DNA linking through a voluntary register. Human Reproduction, 30(1), 111–121. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu289Google Scholar

Bergen, N., & Delacroix, C. (2019). Bypassing the sperm bank: Documenting the experiences of online informal sperm donors. Critical Public Health, 29(5), 584–595. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2018.1492704Google Scholar

Bossema, E., Pim, M., Janssens, R., Treucker, F., van Duinen, K., Nap, A., & Geenen, R. (2014). An inventory of reasons for sperm donation in formal versus informal settings, Human Fertility, 17(1), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.3109/14647273.2014.881561Google Scholar

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oaGoogle Scholar

Cook, H., & Tomazin, F. (2021). “Sperm drought fuels unregulated online market and sex assault concerns”, The Age, 22 May. www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/sperm-drought-fuels-unregulated-online-market-and-sex-assault-concerns-20210521-p57u0s.htmlGoogle Scholar

Cook, R., & Golombok, S. (1995). A survey of semen donation: Phase II – the view of the donors, Human Reproduction, 10(4), 951–959. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136069Google Scholar

Daniels, K. R., Curson, R.,& Lewis, G.M. (1996a). Semen donor recruitment: A study of donors in two clinics, Human Reproduction, 11, 746–751. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019247Google Scholar

Daniels, K. R., Ericsson, H. L., & Burn, I. P (1996b). Families and donor insemination: The views of semen donors, Scandinavian Journal of Social Welfare, 5(4), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2397.1996.tb00149.xGoogle Scholar

Dempsey, D. (2010). Conceiving and negotiating reproductive relationships: Lesbians and gay men forming families with children, Sociology, 44(6), 1145–1162. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0038038510381607Google Scholar

Dempsey, D. (2012a). More like a donor or more like a father? Gay men’s concepts of relatedness to children, Sexualities, 15(2), 156–174. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1363460711433735Google Scholar

Dempsey, D. (2012b) Gay male couples’ paternal involvement in lesbian parented families, Journal of Family Studies, 18(2–3), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.5172/jfs.2012.18.2-3.155Google Scholar

Freeman, T., Jadva, V., Tanfield, E., & Golombok, S. (2016). Online sperm donation: A survey of the demographic characteristics, motivations, preferences and experiences of sperm donors on a connection website. Human Reproduction, 31(9), 2082–2089. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew166Google Scholar

Gilman, L. (2018). Toxic money or paid altruism: The meaning of payments for identity-release gamete donors. Sociology of Health & Illness, 40(4), 702–717. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12718Google Scholar

Glover, A. (2018, 15 June). I found my sperm donor on Facebook. www.kidspot.com.au (accessed 24 February 2021).Google Scholar

Graham, S., Freeman, T., & Jadva, V. (2019). A comparison of the characteristics, motivations, preferences and expectations of men donating sperm online or through a sperm bank, Human Reproduction, 1(34), 2208–2218. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dez173Google Scholar

Hooper, A. (Host) (2018, 24 December): Jo Donor (Episode 1) [Audio podcast]. In Sperm Donation World Podcast.Google Scholar

Hooper, A. (Host) (2019, 20 January): The Patriarch: John Lyndsey Mayger (Episode 5) [Audio podcast]. In Sperm Donation World Podcast.Google Scholar

Kamenev, M. (2019). Sperm drought. The Monthly, August. www.themonthly.com.au/magazine/august-2019Google Scholar

Kelly, F., & Dempsey, D. (2016). The family law implications of early contact between sperm donors and their donor offspring. Family Matters, 98. https://aifs.gov.au/publications/family-matters/issue-98/family-law-implications-early-contact-between-sperm-donors-and-their-donor-offspringGoogle Scholar

Kelly, F., Dempsey, D., & Frew, C., (2019). The donor-linking practices of Australian fertility clinics, Journal of Law and Medicine, 27(2), 355–368.Google Scholar

Lavoie, K., Côté, I., & de Montigny, F. (2017). Assisted reproduction in the digital age: Stories of Canadian sperm donors offering their gametes online via introduction websites. Journal of Men’s Studies, 26(2), 184–202. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1060826517737047Google Scholar

Lever, C. (2020a, 29 November). Australia’s most-prolific sperm donor who fathered 23 children in ONE YEAR is investigated by authorities – after his “hobby” turned into a full-time job because mums love his ethnicity and strike rate. Daily Mail Australia, https://dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8989065/Married-freelance-sperm-donor-Alan-Phan-investigation-fathering-23-children-year.html (accessed 21 January 2021).Google Scholar

Lever, C. (2020b, 25 September). Australia’s chronic sperm donor shortage is causing family heartache. www.kidspot.com.au (accessed 24 February 2021).Google Scholar

Lever, C. (2020c, 1 December). Brisbane sperm donor Alan Phan investigated by VARTA after fathering 23 children. www.7news.com (accessed 21 January 2021).Google Scholar

McNair, R., & Dempsey, D. (2002). Exploring diversity in lesbian-parented families Paper 1: Family formation and women’s roles. Family Matters, (63), 40–49.Google Scholar

Mohr, S. (2014). Beyond motivation: On what it means to be a sperm donor in Denmark, Anthropology & Medicine, 21(2), 162–173. DOI: 10.1080/13648470.2014.914806Google Scholar

Nordqvist, P., & Smart, C. (2014). Relative strangers. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Sage.Google Scholar

Power, J., Dempsey, D., Kelly, F., & Lau, M. (2020). Use of fertility services in Australian lesbian, bisexual and queer women’s pathways to parenthood. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 60(4), 610–615. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13175Google Scholar

Power, J., Perlesz, A., McNair, R., Schofield, M., Pitts, M., Brown, R., & Bickerdike, A. (2012) Gay and bisexual dads and diversity: Fathers in the Work, Love, Play study, Journal of Family Studies, 18(2–3), 143–154, DOI: 10.5172/jfs.2012.18.2-3.143Google Scholar

Riggs, D. W. (2008a). Lesbian mothers, gay sperm donors, and community: Ensuring the well-being of children and families. Health Sociology Review, 17(3), 226–234.Google Scholar

Riggs, D. W. (2008b). Using multinomial logistic regression analysis to develop a model of Australian gay and heterosexual sperm donors’ motivations and beliefs. International Journal of Emerging Technologies & Society, 6(2), 107–123.Google Scholar

Riggs, D. W. & Russell, L. (2011). Characteristics of men willing to act as sperm donors in the context of identity-release legislation. Human Reproduction, 26(1), 266–272. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deq314Google Scholar

Riggs, D. W., & Scholz, B. (2011). The value and meaning attached to genetic relatedness among Australian sperm donors. New Genetics and Society, 30(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636778.2011.552299Google Scholar

Sams, L. (2021, 5 February). Meet the father of 17 who leads Australia’s private sperm donor group. Australian Financial Mail. www.afm.com.au (accessed 24 February 2021).Google Scholar

Sixty Minutes Australia (2019, 18 February). Sperm donor plans to father 2500 children. www.youtube.com/watch?v=NGhbcTGZmkI.Google Scholar

Van den Broeck, U., Vandermeeran, M., Vanderschuren, D., Enzlin, P., Demyttenaere, K., & D’Hooghe, T. (2012). A systematic review of sperm donors: Demographic characteristics, attitudes, motives and experiences of the process of sperm donation. Human Reproduction Update, 19, 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dms039Google Scholar

Victorian Reproductive Assistance Authority (VARTA). (2018). Annual report. https://varta.org.au/sites/default/files/2020-11/VARTA%20annual%20report%202018.pdfGoogle Scholar

Victorian Assisted Reproductive Treatment Authority (VARTA). (2020). Annual report. https://varta.org.au/sites/default/files/2021-01/varta-annual-report-2020.pdf.pdfGoogle Scholar

Woestenburg, N., Winter, H., & Janssens, P. (2016). What motivates men to offer sperm donation via the Internet? Psychology Health Medicine, 21(4), 424–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2015.1081702Google Scholar

Whyte, S. (2019). Clinical vs. exclusively online sperm donors: What’s the difference? Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 37(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2018.1540864Google Scholar

Whyte, S., Savage, D., & Torgler, B. (2017). Online sperm donors: The impact of family, friends, personality and risk perception on behaviour. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 35(6), 723–732. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.08.023Google Scholar

Agence France Presse. (2019, 12 April). Il est surnommé le “docteur sperme” aux Pays-Bas: Jan Karbaat est suspecté d’avoir utilisé sa propre semence dans sa clinique. RTL Info. www.rtl.be/info/monde/europe/il-est-surnomme-le-docteur-sperme-aux-pays-bas-jan-karbaat-est-suspecte-d-avoir-utilise-sa-propre-semence-dans-sa-clinique-1115904.aspxGoogle Scholar

Beeson, D. R., Jennings, P. K., & Kramer, W. (2011). Offspring searching for their sperm donors: how family type shapes the process. Human Reproduction, 26(9), 2415–2424. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der202Google Scholar

Bender, L. (2003). Genes, parents, and assisted reproductive technologies: ARTs, mistakes, sex, race, and law. Columbia Journal of Gender and Law, 12, 1.Google Scholar

Bender, L. (2005). To err is human: ART mix-ups – a labor-based, relational proposal. Journal of Gender, Race and Justice, 9, 443.Google Scholar

Blake, L., Zadeh, S., Statham, H., & Freeman, T. (2014). Families created by assisted reproduction: children’s perspectives. In Freeman, T., Graham, S., Ebtehaj, F., & Richards, M. (Eds.), Relatedness in Assisted Reproduction (pp. 251–269). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Blake, L., Ilioi, E., & Golombok, S. (2016). Thoughts and feelings about the donor: a family perspective. In Freeman, T., Graham, S., Ebtehaj, F., & Richards, M. (Eds.), Relatedness in Assisted Reproduction (pp. 293–331) Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Blyth, E. (2012). Discovering the ‘facts of life’ following anonymous donor insemination. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 26(2), 143–161. https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebs006Google Scholar

Blyth, E. (2012). Genes r us? Making sense of genetic and non-genetic relationships following anonymous donor insemination. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 24(7), 719–726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.02.010Google Scholar

Byrne, E. (2019). Texas House passes bill classifying fertility fraud as sexual assault. The Texas Tribune. www.texastribune.org/2019/05/16/texas-house-bill-fertility-fraud-crime/Google Scholar

Canneaux, M., Kobilinsky, N., Wolf, J. P., Golse, B., & Beauquier-Maccotta, B. (2016). Information, transmission, secret: quel discours pour les enfants nés par don de gamètes?. Gynécologie obstétrique & fertilité, 44(7–8), 410–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gyobfe.2016.05.002Google Scholar

Chicoine, S. (2020). The birth of fertility fraud: how to protect Washingtonians. Washington Law Review Online, 95(1), 168–204.Google Scholar

Cho, K., Ruiter, J., & Dahan, M. H. (2018). Protecting fertility clinics against sperm-related fraud: a call to action. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 35(6), 1131–1132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-018-1175-8Google Scholar

Couture, V., Dubois, M. A., Drouin, R., Moutquin, J. M., & Bouffard, C. (2014). Strengths and pitfalls of Canadian gamete and embryo donor registries: searching for beneficent solutions. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 28(3), 369–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.10.020Google Scholar

Crawshaw, M. (2018). Direct-to-consumer DNA testing: the fallout for individuals and their families unexpectedly learning of their donor conception origins. Human Fertility, 21(4), 225–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2017.1339127Google Scholar

Freeman, T. (2015). Gamete donation, information sharing and the best interests of the child: an overview of the psychosocial evidence. Monash Bioethics Review, 33(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-015-0018-yGoogle Scholar

Freeman, T., Jadva, J., & Slutsky, J. (2016). Sperm donors limited: psychosocial aspects of genetic connections and the regulation of offspring numbers. In Golombok, S., Scott, R., Appelby, J. B., Richards, M., Wilkinson, S. (Eds.), Regulating Reproductive Donation (pp. 165–184) Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fox, D. (2017). Reproductive negligence. Columbia Law Review, 117, 149.Google Scholar

Frith, L., Blyth, E., Crawshaw, M., & van den Akker, O. (2018). Secrets and disclosure in donor conception. Sociology of Health & Illness, 40(1), 188–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12633Google Scholar

Golombok, S. (2015). Modern Families: Parents and Children in New Family Forms. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gruben, V., Cattapan, A., Cameron, A., Busby, K., Baylis, F., Carsley, S., … & White, P. (2019). Joint Submission to Health Canada on Prepublication of Proposed Regulations to the Assisted Human Reproduction Act.Google Scholar

Guichon, J. R., Mitchell, I., & Giroux, M. (Eds.), (2012). The Right to Know One’s Origins: Assisted Human Reproduction and the Best Interests of Children. ASP.Google Scholar

Harper, J. C., Kennett, D., & Reisel, D. (2016). The end of donor anonymity: how genetic testing is likely to drive anonymous gamete donation out of business. Human Reproduction, 31(6), 1135–1140. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew065Google Scholar

Jadva, V., Freeman, T., Kramer, W., & Golombok, S. (2009). The experiences of adolescents and adults conceived by sperm donation: comparisons by age of disclosure and family type. Human Reproduction, 24(8), 1909–1919. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dep110Google Scholar

MacBride, K. (2021). Fertility doctors used their sperm to get patients pregnant. The children want justice. Vice News. www.vice.com/en/article/y3g5qy/fertility-doctors-used-their-sperm-to-get-patients-pregnant-the-children-want-justiceGoogle Scholar

Mac Dougall, K., Becker, G., Scheib, J. E., & Nachtigall, R. D. (2007). Strategies for disclosure: how parents approach telling their children that they were conceived with donor gametes. Fertility and Sterility, 87(3), 524–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.07.1514Google Scholar

Madeira, J. L. (2019). Uncommon misconceptions: holding physicians accountable for insemination fraud. Law & Inequality, 37, 45.Google Scholar

Madeira, J. L. (2020). Understanding illicit insemination and fertility fraud, from patient experience to legal reform. Columbia Journal of Gender & Law, 39, 110.Google Scholar

Mahlstedt, P. P., LaBounty, K., & Kennedy, W. T. (2010). The views of adult offspring of sperm donation: essential feedback for the development of ethical guidelines within the practice of assisted reproductive technology in the United States. Fertility and Sterility, 93(7), 2236–2246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.12.119Google Scholar

Miola, J. (2004). Mix-ups, mistake and moral judgement: recent developments in UK law on assisted conception. Feminist Legal Studies, 12(1), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FEST.0000026125.37716.d5Google Scholar

Nelson, M. K., Hertz, R., & Kramer, W. (2013). Making sense of donors and donor siblings: A comparison of the perceptions of donor-conceived offspring in lesbian-parent and heterosexual-parent families. In Visions of the Twenty-First Century Family: Transforming Structures and Identities (pp. 1–42). Emerald Group Publishing.Google Scholar

Paillé, P., & Mucchielli, A. (2016). L’analyse qualitative en sciences humaines et sociales. Quatrième édition. ed. Malakoff, . Armand Colin.Google Scholar

Paye, E. (2018). Barwin’s babies: the remarkable story of a disgraced Ottawa fertility doctor and those who say they are his children. Ottawa Citizen. https://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-news/barwins-babiesGoogle Scholar

Pennings, G., Klitzman, R., Zegers-Hochschild, F. (2016). International regulation and cross-country comparisons. In Golombok, S., Scott, R., Appelby, J.B., Richards, M., Wilkinson, S. (Eds.), Regulating Reproductive Donation (pp. 39–59). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rodino, I. S., Burton, P. J., & Sanders, K. A. (2011). Donor information considered important to donors, recipients and offspring: an Australian perspective. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 22(3), 303–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.11.007Google Scholar

Sharak, S. (2020). Richards v. Kiken and the legal implications of fertility fraud. American Journal of Law & Medicine, 46(4), 528–535.Google Scholar

Tabachnik, S. (2020, 9 January). Proposed bill would finally make it a felony for doctors to inseminate patients with their own sperm. Denver Post. www.denverpost.com/2020/01/09/fertility-fraud-paul-jones-sperm-doctor-colorado/Google Scholar

The Associated Press. (2016, 12 September). Indiana fertility doctor used own sperm to impregnate patients, court docs say. CBS News. www.cbsnews.com/news/indiana-fertility-doctor-used-own-sperm-to-impregnate-women-court-docs-say/Google Scholar

Trépanier, A. (2020, 15 June). Class-action lawsuit against disgraced fertility doctor grows. CBS News. www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/norman-barwin-class-action-16-biological-children-1.5609426Google Scholar

Wright, K. (2016). Limiting offspring numbers: can we justify regulation? In Golombok, S., Scott, R., Appelby, J. B., Richards, M., & Wilkinson, S. (Eds.), Regulating Reproductive Donation (pp. 185–204). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar