Book contents
- Domestic Judicial Review of Trade Remedies
- Series page
- Domestic Judicial Review of Trade Remedies
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Canada: high deference, stark reality
- 3 United States: judicial review: a cornerstone of trade remedies practice
- 4 Mexico: quasi-judicial review of trade remedy measures by NAFTA panels
- 5 Colombia: a complex court system with the possibility of three instances
- 6 Brazil: the need for enhanced effectiveness
- 7 Argentina: a well-structured but unsuccessful judicial review system
- 8 Peru: a sophisticated but underused judicial review system
- 9 The European Union: an imperfect and time-consuming system
- 10 Turkey: a judicial review system in need of change
- 11 Israel: a comparative study of two models
- 12 South Africa: a complicated, unpredictable, long and costly judicial review system
- 13 Pakistan: an evolving judicial review system
- 14 India: a three-tier judicial review system
- 15 China: an untested theoretical possibility?
- 16 Korea: increasing attention and new challenges
- 17 Indonesia: a judicial review system in dire need of restructuring
- 18 Australia: judicial review with merits review
- 19 Countries with insufficient judicial review activity
- 20 Conclusions
- Index
18 - Australia: judicial review with merits review
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 February 2013
Edited by
Book contents
- Domestic Judicial Review of Trade Remedies
- Series page
- Domestic Judicial Review of Trade Remedies
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Canada: high deference, stark reality
- 3 United States: judicial review: a cornerstone of trade remedies practice
- 4 Mexico: quasi-judicial review of trade remedy measures by NAFTA panels
- 5 Colombia: a complex court system with the possibility of three instances
- 6 Brazil: the need for enhanced effectiveness
- 7 Argentina: a well-structured but unsuccessful judicial review system
- 8 Peru: a sophisticated but underused judicial review system
- 9 The European Union: an imperfect and time-consuming system
- 10 Turkey: a judicial review system in need of change
- 11 Israel: a comparative study of two models
- 12 South Africa: a complicated, unpredictable, long and costly judicial review system
- 13 Pakistan: an evolving judicial review system
- 14 India: a three-tier judicial review system
- 15 China: an untested theoretical possibility?
- 16 Korea: increasing attention and new challenges
- 17 Indonesia: a judicial review system in dire need of restructuring
- 18 Australia: judicial review with merits review
- 19 Countries with insufficient judicial review activity
- 20 Conclusions
- Index
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Domestic Judicial Review of Trade RemediesExperiences of the Most Active WTO Members, pp. 379 - 398Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2013