Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T08:58:01.580Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Social cognition and emotions underlying dog behavior

from PART II - BEHAVIOR, COGNITION AND TRAINING

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 December 2016

Friederike Range
Affiliation:
Messerli Research Institute, Veterinärmedizinische Universität Wien (Vetmeduni Vienna), Wien, Austria
Zsófia Virányi
Affiliation:
Messerli Research Institute, Veterinärmedizinische Universität Wien (Vetmeduni Vienna), Wien, Austria
James Serpell
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Since domestication began more than 10 000 years ago (Pang et al., 2009; see also Clutton-Brock, Chapter 2; vonHoldt & Driscoll, Chapter 3), dogs have been living in a human-dominated niche in which they are likely to enjoy advantages if they are able to communicate and cooperate successfully with people (Miklósi et al., 2004; Bradshaw & Rooney, Chapter 8). As such, dogs are thought to have evolved cognitive-emotional traits analogous to the social skills that differentiate humans from other primates (Hare et al., 2005; Topál et al., 2009a). Accordingly, investigating the cognition of domestic dogs provides a potentially exciting opportunity to reveal which cognitive traits have functional relevance in the present social life of humans (Virányi et al., 2008a).

Recent intensive research focusing on dogs’ social interactions and communication with humans has revealed that dogs perform more like humans in some communicative and cooperative tasks than any other animal species (Lakatos et al., 2009; Soproni et al., 2001). In some of these tasks, dogs outperform other species that are more closely related to humans, such as chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) (Brauer et al., 2006; Hare et al., 2002; but see Mulcahy & Hedge, 2012). These intriguing dog–human similarities are often assumed to originate from the dog's adaptation to the human environment, and are partly due to their life-long experiences with humans and the influence that this exerts on their cognitive development (Udell et al., 2010, Miklósi & Tópal, 2011). Dogs typically grow up in human families and develop attachments and dependent relationships analogous to those between children and their parents (Topál et al., 1998). This developmental environment can foster a variety of mechanisms ranging from classical conditioning (Bentosela et al., 2008) to more complex modifications of cognitive and emotional processes, such as the ontogenetic process of “enculturation” that has been proposed to result in enhanced cognitive abilities in non-human primates raised by humans (Hare et al., 2005). Consequently, many argue that dog behavior and cognition have been modified in ways that help dogs to be socially integrated into human groups.

For both theoretical and practical reasons, it is important to ask to what extent aspects of dog behavior and cognition have either been genetically modified during the course of domestication or altered by individual experiences and training.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Domestic Dog
Its Evolution, Behavior and Interactions with People
, pp. 182 - 209
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agnetta, B., Hare, B. & Tomasello, M. (2000). Cues to food location that domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) of different ages do and do not use. Animal Cognition, 3: 107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albuquerque, N., Guo, K., Wilkinson, A., Savalli, C., Otta, E. & Mills, D. (2016). Dogs recognize dog and human emotions. Biology Letters, 12: 20150883 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, J., Montant, M. & Schmitt, D. (1996). Rhesus monkeys fail to use gaze direction as an experimenter-given cue in an object choice task. Behavioral Processes, 37: 47–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aust, U., Range, F., Steurer, M. & Huber, L. (2008). Inferential reasoning by exclusion: a comparative study of pigeons, dogs, and humans. Animal Cognition. http://doi10.1007/s10071-008-0149-0 CrossRef
Barber, A. L. A., Randi, D., Müller, C. A. & Huber, L. (2016). The processing of human emotional faces by pet and lab dogs: Evidence for lateralization and experience effects. PLoS ONE, 11: e0152393 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bauer, E. B. & Smuts, B. B. (2007). Cooperation and competition during dyadic play in domestic dogs, Canis familiaris. Animal Behavior, 73: 489–99.Google Scholar
Bekoff, M. (1995). Play signals as punctuation – the structure of social play in canids. Behavior, 132: 419–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bekoff, M. (2001). Social play behavior – cooperation, fairness, trust, and the evolution of morality. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8: 81–90.Google Scholar
Bekoff, M. (2004). Wild justice, cooperation and fair play: Minding manners, being nice, and feeling good. In The Origins and Nature of Sociality, eds. Sussman, R. & Chapman, A. Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
Bentosela, M., Barrera, G., Jakovcevic, A., Elgier, A. M. & Mustaca, A. E. (2008). Effect of reinforcement, reinforcer omission and extinction on a communicative response in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris). Behavioral Processes, 78: 464–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boesch, C. (1991). Teaching among wild chimpanzees. Animal Behavior, 41: 530–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bräuer, J., Call, J. & Tomasello, M. (2004). Visual perspective taking in dogs (Canis familiaris) in the presence of barriers. Applied Animal Behavior Science, 88: 299–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brauer, J., Kaminski, J., Riedel, J., Call, J. & Tomasello, M. (2006). Making inferences about the location of hidden food: social dog, causal ape. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 120: 38–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brucks, D., Essler, J. L., Marshall-Pescini, S. & Range, F. (2016). Inequity aversion negatively affects tolerance and contact-seeking behaviours towards partner and experimenter. PLoS ONE, 11(4): e 0153799. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153799.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Call, J. (2001). Chimpanzee social cognition. Trends in Cognitive Science, 5: 388–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Call, J. (2006) Inferences by exclusion in the great apes: the effect of age and species. Animal Cognition, 9: 393–403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Call, J., Bräuer, J., Kaminski, J. & Tomasello, M. (2003). Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) are sensitive to the attentional state of humans. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 117: 257–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caro, T. M. & Hauser, M. D. (1992). Is there teaching in nonhuman animals? Quarterly Review of Biology, 67: 151–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chance, M. R. A. & Jolly, C. (1970). Social Groups of Monkeys, Apes and Men. London, Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. J., Ashton, C., Bishop, S., West, R., Mills, D. S. & Young, R. J. (2003). Clever hounds: social cognition in the domestic dog (Canis familiaris). Applied Animal Behavior Science, 81: 229–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppinger, R. & Coppinger, L. (2001). Dogs: A New Understanding of Canine Origin, Behavior and Evolution. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cordoni, G. (2009). Social play in captive wolves (Canis lupus): not only an immature affair. Behavior, 146: 1363–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuaya, L. V., Hernández-Pérez, R. & Concha, L. (2016). Our faces in the dog's brain: functional imaging reveals temporal cortex activation during perception of human faces. PloS ONE, 11: e0149431 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Custance, D. & Mayer, J. (2012). Empathic-like responding by domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) to distress in humans: an exploratory study. Animal Cognition, 15: 851–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Waal, F. B. M. & Suchak, M. (2010). Prosocial primates: selfish and unselfish motivations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 365: 2711–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duranton, C., Bedossa, T. & Gaunet, F. (2016). When facing an unfamiliar person, pet dogs present social referencing based on their owners’ direction of movement alone. Animal Behaviour, 113: 147–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elgier, A. M., Jakowevic, A., Barrera, G., Mustaca, A. E. & Bentosela, M. (2009). Communication between domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) and humans: dogs are good learners. Behavioral Processes, 81: 402–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Essler, J. L., Cafazzo, S., Marshall-Pescini, S., Virányi, Z., Kotrschal, K., & Range, F. (2016). Play behavior in wolves: using the ‘50: 50’ rule to test for egalitarian play styles. PloS ONE, 11: e0154150 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitch, W. T., Huber, L. & Bugnyar, T. (2010). Social cognition and the evolution of language: constructing cognitive phylogenies. Neuron, 65: 795–814.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frank, H. & Frank, M. G. (1982a). On the effects of domestication on canine social-development and behavior. Applied Animal Ethology, 8: 507–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, H. & Frank, M. G. (1982b). Comparison of problem-solving performance in 6-week-old wolves and dogs. Animal Behavior, 30: 95–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fugazza, C. & Miklósi, Á. (2014). Should old dog trainers learn new tricks? The efficiency of the Do as I Do method and shaping/clicker training method to train dogs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 153: 53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukuzawa, M., Mills, D. S. & Cooper, J. J. (2005). More than just a word: non-semantic command variables affect obedience in the domestic dog (Canis familiaris). Applied Animal Behavior Science, 91: 129–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gácsi, M., Gyóri, B., Virányi, Z. et al. (2009c). Explaining dog wolf differences in utilizing human pointing gestures: selection for synergistic shifts in the development of some social skills. PLoS ONE, 4: e6584.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gácsi, M., Kara, E., Belényi, B., Tópal, J. & Miklósi, A. (2009a). The effect of development and individual differences in pointing comprehension of dogs. Animal Cognition, 12: 471–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gácsi, M., Mcgreevy, P., Kara, E. & Adam, M. (2009b). Effects of selection for cooperation and attention in dogs. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 5.CrossRef
Gácsi, M., Miklósi, A., Varga, O., Tópal, J. & Csányi, V. (2004). Are readers of our face readers of our minds? Dogs (Canis familiaris) show situation-dependent recognition of human's attention. Animal Cognition, 7: 144–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gagliardi, J. L., Kirkpatricksteger, K. K., Thomas, J., Allen, G. J. & Blumberg, M. S. (1995). Seeing and knowing – knowledge attribution versus stimulus-control in adult humans (Homo sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 109: 107–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaunet, F. (2008). How do guide dogs of blind owners and pet dogs of sighted owners (Canis familiaris) ask their owners for food? Animal Cognition, 11: 475–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaunet, F. (2010). How do guide dogs and pet dogs (Canis familiaris) ask their owners for their toy and for playing? Animal Cognition, 13: 311–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gergely, G., Bekkering, H. & Kiraly, I. (2002). Rational imitation in preverbal infants. Nature, 415: 755.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grassmann, S., Kaminski, J. & Tomasello, M. (2012). How two word-trained dogs integrate pointing and naming. Animal Cognition, 15: 657–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griebel, U. & Oller, D. K. (2012). Vocabulary learning in a Yorkshire Terrier: slow mapping of spoken words. PLoS ONE, 7: e30182 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hare, B., Brown, M., Williamson, C. & Tomasello, M. (2002). The domestication of social cognition in dogs. Science, 298: 1634–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hare, B., Plyusnina, I., Ignacio, N. et al. (2005). Social cognitive evolution in captive foxes is a correlated by-product of experimental domestication. Current Biology, 15: 226–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hare, B. & Tomasello, M. (2005). Human-like social skills in dogs? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9: 439–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harr, A. L., Gilbert, V. R. & Phillips, K. A. (2009). Do dogs (Canis familiaris) show contagious yawning? Animal Cognition, 12: 833–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hecht, J., Miklósi, Á. & Gácsia, M. (2012). Behavioral assessment and owner perceptions of behaviors associated with guilt in dogs. Applied Animal Behavior Science, 139: 134–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herberlein, M. & Turner, D. (2009). Dogs, Canis familiaris, find hidden food by observing and interacting with a conspecific. Animal Behavior, 78: 385–91 Google Scholar
Heyes, C. M. (1993). Imitation, culture and cognition. Animal Behavior, 46: 999–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyes, C. M. (1998). Theory of mind in nonhuman primates. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21: 101–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horn, L., Range, F. & Huber, L. (2013). Dogs’ attention towards humans depends on their relationship, not only on social familiarity. Animal Cognition, 16: 435–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, L., Viranyi, Z., Miklósi, A., Huber, L. & Range, F. (2012). Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) flexibly adjust their human-directed behavior to the actions of their human partners in a problem situation. Animal Cognition, 15: 57–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, A. (2009a). Disambiguating the “guilty look”: salient prompts to a familiar dog behavior. Behavioral Processes, 81: 447–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, A. (2009b). Attention to attention in domestic dog (Canis familiaris) dyadic play. Animal Cognition, 12: 107–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horowitz, A. (2012). Fair is fine, but more is better: limits to inequity aversion in the domestic dog. Social Justice Research, 25: 195–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, L., Range, F., Voelkl, B., Szucsich, A., Viranyi, Z. & Miklósi, A. (2009). The evolution of imitation: what do the capacities of non-human animals tell us about the mechanisms of imitation? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B – Biological Sciences, 364: 2299–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huber, L., Range, F. & Virányi, Z. (2011). Dogs imitate selectively, not necessarily rationally: reply to Kaminski et al. Animal Behavior, 83: e1–3.Google Scholar
Jakovcevic, A., Elgier, A. M., Mustaca, A. E. & Bentosela, M. (2010). Breed differences in dogs’ (Canis familiaris) gaze to the human face. Behavioral Processes, 84: 602–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joly-Mascheroni, R. M., Senju, A. & Shepherd, A. J. (2008). Dogs catch human yawns. Biology Letters, 4: 446–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaminski, J. (2008). Dogs (Canis familiaris) are adapted to receive human communication. In Neurobiology of “Umwelt”: How Living Beings Perceive the World, Research and Perspectives in Neurosciences, eds. Berthoz, A. & Christen, Y.. Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 103–7.Google Scholar
Kaminski, J., Bräuer, J., Call, J. & Tomasello, M. (2009b). Domestic dogs are sensitive to a human's perspective. Behaviour, 146: 979–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaminski, J., Call, J. & Fischer, J. (2004). Word learning in a domestic dog: evidence for “fast mapping.” Science, 304: 1682–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaminski, J., Neumann, M., Brauer, J., Call, J. & Tomasello, M. (2011b). Dogs, Canis familiaris, communicate with humans to request but not to inform. Animal Behavior, 82: 651–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaminski, J., Nitzschner, M., Wobber, V. et al. (2011a). Do dogs distinguish rational from irrational acts? Animal Behaviour, 81: 195–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaminski, J., Schulz, L. & Tomasello, M. (2012). How dogs know when communication is intended for them. Developmental Science, 15: 222–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaminski, J., Tempelmann, S., Call, J. & Tomasello, M. (2009a). Domestic dogs comprehend human communication with iconic signs. Developmental Science, 12: 831–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kis, A., Topál, J., Gácsi, M. et al. (2012). Does the A-not-B error in adult pet dogs indicate sensitivity to human communication? Animal Cognition, 15: 737–43 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kubinyi, E., Topál, J., Miklósi, Á. & Csányi, V. (2003). The effect of human demonstrator on the acquisition of a manipulative task. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 117: 156–65.Google Scholar
Kubinyi, E., Vas, J., Hejjas, K. et al. (2012). Polymorphism in the Tyrosine Hydroxylase (TH) gene is associated with activity-impulsivity in German shepherd dogs. PLoS ONE, 7: e30271 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kubinyi, E., Virányi, Z. & Miklósi, A. (2007). Comparative social cognition: from wolf and dog to humans. Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews, 2: 26–46.Google Scholar
Kundey, S. M. A., De Los Reyes, A., Royer, E. et al. (2011). Reputation-like inference in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris). Animal Cognition, 14: 291–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kundey, S. M. A., De Los Reyes, A., Taglang, C. et al. (2010). Domesticated dogs (Canis familiaris) react to what others can and cannot hear. Applied Animal Behavior Science, 126: 45–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kupán, K., Adam, M., Gyoergy, G. & Jozsef, T. (2011). Why do dogs (Canis familiaris) select the empty container in an observational learning task? Animal Cognition, 14: 259–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakatos, G., Gácsi, M., Tópal, J. & Miklósi, A. (2012). Comprehension and utilisation of pointing gestures and gazing in dog-human communication in relatively complex situations. Animal Cognition, 15: 201–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lakatos, G., Soproni, K., Doka, A. & Miklósi, A. (2009). A comparative approach to dogs’ (Canis familiaris) and human infants’ comprehension of various forms of pointing gestures. Animal Cognition, 12: 621–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Madsen, E. A. & Persson, T. (2013). Contagious yawning in domestic dog puppies (Canis lupus familiaris): the effect of ontogeny and emotional closeness on low-level imitation in dogs. Animal Cognition, 16: 233–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maginnity, M. E. & Grace, R. C. (2014). Visual perspective taking by dogs (Canis familiaris) in a Guesser–Knower task: Evidence for a canine theory of mind? Animal Cognition, 17: 1375–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall-Pescini, S., Passalacqua, C., Ferrario, A., Valsecchi, P. & Prato-Previde, E. (2011b). Social eavesdropping in the domestic dog. Animal Behavior, 81: 1177–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall-Pescini, S., Passalacqua, C., Valsecchi, P. & Prato-Previde, E. (2010). Comment on “Differential sensitivity to human communication in dogs, wolves, and Human infants”. Science, 329: 142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall-Pescini, S., Prato-Previde, E. & Valsecchi, P. (2011a). Are dogs (Canis familiaris) misled more by their owners than by strangers in a food choice task? Animal Cognition, 14: 137–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall-Pescini, S., Valsecchi, P., Petak, I., Accorsi, P. A. & Previde, E. P. (2008). Does training make you smarter? The effects of training on dogs’ performance (Canis familiaris) in a problem solving task. Behavioral Processes, 78: 449–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNelis, N. L. & Boatright-Horowitz, S. L. (1998). Social monitoring in a primate social group: the relation between visual attention and hierarchical ranks. Animal Cognition, 1: 65–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mech, D. (1970). The Wolf: The Ecology and Behavior of an Endangered Species. Garden City, NY: Natural History Press.Google Scholar
Mech, L. D. & Boitani, L. (2003). Wolf social ecology. In Wolves: Behavior, Ecology, and Conservation, eds. Mech, L. D. & Boitani, L.. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, p. 448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menzel, E. W. (1974). A group of young chimpanzees in a one acre-field. In Behavior of Nonhuman Primates. eds. Schrier, A. M. & Stollnitz, F.. New York: Academic Press, p. 509.Google Scholar
Menzel, E. W. (1997). Leadership and communication in young chimpanzees. In Precultural Primate Behavior, ed. Menzel, E.W.. Basel: Karger, p. 258.Google Scholar
Merola, I., Prato-Previde, E. & Marshall-Pescini, S. (2012a). Social referencing in dog-owner dyads? Animal Cognition, 15: 175–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merola, I., Prato-Previde, E. & Marshall-Pescini, S. (2012b). Dogs’ social referencing towards owners and strangers. PLoS ONE, 7: e47653. http://doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047653 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mersmann, D., Tomasello, M., Call, J., Kaminski, J. & Taborsky, M. (2011). Simple mechanisms can explain social learning in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris). Ethology, 117: 675–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Met, A., Miklósi, Á., & Lakatos, G. (2014). Gaze-following behind barriers in domestic dogs. Animal Cognition, 17: 1401–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miklósi, A., Kubinyi, E., Tópal, J., Gácsi, M., Viranyi, Z. & Csanyi, V. (2003). A simple reason for a big difference: wolves do not look back at humans, but dogs do. Current Biology, 13: 763–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miklósi, A., Polgardi, R., Topál, J. & Csányi, V. (2000). Intentional behavior in dog-human communication: an experimental analysis of “showing” behavior in the dog. Animal Cognition, 3: 159.Google Scholar
Miklósi, A., Polgardi, R., Tópal, J. & Csanyi, V. (1998). Use of experimenter-given cues in dogs. Animal Cognition, 1: 113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miklósi, A. & Soproni, K. (2006). A comparative analysis of animals’ understanding of the human pointing gesture. Animal Cognition, 9: 81–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miklósi, A. & Tópal, J. (2011). On the hunt for the gene of perspective taking: pitfalls in methodology. Learning & Behavior, 39: 310–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miklósi, A., Tópal, J. & Csanyi, V. (2004). Comparative social cognition: what can dogs teach us? Animal Behavior, 67: 995–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, H. C., Rayburn-Reeves, R. & Zentall, T. R. (2009). Imitation and emulation by dogs using a bidirectional control procedure. Behavioral Processes, 80: 109–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mongillo, P., Bono, G., Regolin, L. & Marinelli, L. (2010). Selective attention to humans in companion dogs, Canis familiaris. Animal Behavior, 80: 1057–63.Google Scholar
Moore, K., Cleland, J. & McGrew, W. C. (1991). Visual encounters between families of cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). Primates, 32: 23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, P. H., Doe, C. & Godsell, E. (2008). Secondary emotions in non-primate species? Behavioral reports and subjective claims by animal owners. Cognition & Emotion, 22: 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulcahy, N. J. & Hedge, V. (2012). Are great apes tested with an abject object-choice task? Animal Behavior, 83: 313–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, C. A., Schmitt, K., Barber, A. L. & Huber, L. (2015). Dogs can discriminate emotional expressions of human faces. Current Biology, 25: 601–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nicol, C. J. & Pope, S. J. (1994). Social learning in small flocks of laying hens. Animal Behavior, 47: 1289–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nishida, T. (1987). Local traditions and cultural transmission. In Primate Societies, eds. Smuts, B. B., Cheney, D., Seyfarth, R., Wrangham, R. & Struhsaker, T.. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, p. 578.Google Scholar
O'Hara, S. & Reeve, A. (2011). A test of the yawning contagion and emotional connectedness hypothesis in dogs, Canis familiaris. Animal Behavior, 81: 335–40.Google Scholar
Oliva, J. L., Rault, J. L., Appleton, B. & Lill, A. (2015). Oxytocin enhances the appropriate use of human social cues by the domestic dog (Canis familiaris) in an object choice task. Animal Cognition, 18: 767–75.Google Scholar
Osthaus, B., Lea, S. E. G. & Slater, A. M. (2003). Training influences problem-solving abilities in dogs (Canis lupus familiaris). Proceedings of the Annual BSAS Conference, p. 103.
Osthaus, B., Lea, S. E. G. & Slater, A. M. (2005). Dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) fail to show understanding of means-end connections in a string-pulling task. Animal Cognition, 8: 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palagi, E. (2006). Social play in bonobos (Pan paniscus) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): Implications for natural social systems and interindividual relationships. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 129: 418–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pang, J.-F., Kluetsch, C., Zou, X.-J. et al. (2009). MtDNA data indicate a single origin for dogs south of Yangtze River, less than 16,300 years ago, from numerous wolves. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 26: 2849–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petter, M., Musolino, E., Roberts, W. A. & Cole, M. (2009). Can dogs (Canis familiaris) detect human deception? Behavioral Processes, 82: 109–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pettersson, H., Kaminski, J., Herrmann, E. & Tomasello, M. (2011). Understanding of human communicative motives in domestic dogs. Applied Animal Behavior Science, 133: 235–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilley, J. W. & Reid, A. K. (2011). Border collie comprehends object names as verbal referents. Behavioral Processes, 86: 184–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pongrácz, P., Banhegyi, P. & Miklósi, A. (2012). When rank counts – dominant dogs learn better from a human demonstrator in a two-action test. Behavior, 149: 111–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pongrácz, P., Miklósi, A., Kubinyi, E., Gurobi, K., Tópal, J. & Csanyi, V. (2001). Social learning in dogs: the effect of a human demonstrator on the performance of dogs in a detour task. Animal Behavior, 62: 1109–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pongrácz, P., Miklósi, A., Timar-Geng, K. & Csanyi, V. (2004). Verbal attention-getting as a key factor in social learning between dog (Canis familiaris) and human. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 118: 375–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pongrácz, P., Molnar, C. & Miklósi, A. (2006). Acoustic parameters of dog barks carry emotional information for humans. Applied Animal Behavior Science, 100: 228–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pongrácz, P., Molnar, C., Miklósi, A. & Csanyi, V. (2005). Human listeners are able to classify dog (Canis familiaris) barks recorded in different situations. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 119: 136–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pongrácz, P., Vida, V., Bánhegyi, P. & Miklósi, Á. (2008). How does dominance rank status affect individual and social learning performance in the dog (Canis familiaris)? Animal Cognition, 11: 75–82.Google ScholarPubMed
Povinelli, D. J., Reaux, J. E., Bierschwale, D. T., Allain, A. D. & Simon, B. B. (1997). Exploitation of pointing as a referential gesture in young children, but not adolescent chimpanzees. Cognitive Development, 12: 327–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Povinelli, D. J. & Vonk, J. (2003). Chimpanzee minds: suspiciously human? Trends in Cognitive Science, 7: 157–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Povinelli, D. J. & Eddy, T. J. (1996) Factors influencing young chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) recognition of attention. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 110: 336–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, S. D. & De Waal, F. B. M. (2002). Empathy: its ultimate and proximate bases. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25: 1–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quervel-Chaumette, M., Dale, R., Marshall-Pescini, S. & Range, F. (2015). Familiarity affects other-regarding preferences in pet dogs. Scientific Reports, 5: 18102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quervel-Chaumette, M., Faerber, V., Faragó, T., Marshall-Pescini, S. & Range, F. (2016). Investigating empathy-like responding to conspecifics’ distress in pet dogs. PloS ONE, 11: e0152920 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Range, F., Heucke, S. L., Gruber, C., Konz, A., Huber, L. & Virányi, Z. (2009b). The effect of ostensive cues on dogs’ performance in a manipulative social learning task. Applied Animal Behavior Science, 120: 170–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Range, F., Horn, L., Bugnyar, T., Gajdon, G. K. & Huber, L. (2009a). Social attention in keas, dogs, and human children. Animal Cognition, 12: 181–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Range, F., Horn, L., Virányi, Z. & Huber, L. (2009c). The absence of reward induces inequity aversion in dogs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106: 340–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Range, F., Leitner, K. & Virányi, Z. (2012). The influence of the relationship and motivation on inequity aversion in dogs. Social Justice Research, 25: 170–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Range, F., Ritter, C. & Virányi, Z. (2015). Testing the myth: tolerant dogs and aggressive wolves. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 282: 20150220 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Range, F. & Virányi, Z. (2011). Development of gaze following abilities in wolves (Canis lupus). PLoS ONE: e16888. http://doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0016888 CrossRef
Range, F. & Virányi, Z. (2013). Social learning from humans or conspecifics: differences and similarities between wolves and dogs. Frontiers in Psychology. 4: 868. http://doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00868 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Range, F. & Virányi, Z. (2014). Wolves are better imitators of conspecifics than dogs. PLoS ONE, 9: e86559.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Range, F. & Virányi, Z. (2015). Tracking the evolutionary origins of dog-human cooperation: the “Canine Cooperation Hypothesis.” Frontiers in Psychology, 5: 1582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Range, F., Virányi, Z. & Huber, L. (2007). Selective imitation in domestic dogs. Current Biology, 17: 868–872.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riedel, J., Buttelmann, D., Call, J. & Tomasello, M. (2006). Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) use a physical marker to locate hidden food. Animal Cognition, 9: 27–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riedel, J., Schumann, K., Kaminski, J., Call, J. & Tomasello, M. (2008). The early ontogeny of human-dog communication. Animal Behavior, 75: 1003–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rooney, N. J. & Bradshaw, J. W. (2002). An experimental study of the effects of play upon the dog-human relationship. Applied Animal Behavior Science, 75: 161–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savolainen, P., Zhang, Y. P., Luo, J., Lundeberg, J. & Leitner, T. (2002). Genetic evidence for an East Asian origin of domestic dogs. Science, 298: 1610–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scheider, L., Grassmann, S., Kaminski, J. & Tomasello, M. (2011). Domestic dogs use contextual information and tone of voice when following a human pointing gesture. PLoS ONE: e21676. http://doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021676 CrossRef
Schwab, C. & Huber, L. (2006). Obey or not obey? Dogs (Canis familiaris) behave differently in response to attentional states of their owners. Journal of Comparative Psychology 120: 169–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, J. P. & Fuller, J. L. (1965). Genetics and the Social Behavior of the Dog. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Senju, A. & Csibra, G. (2008). Gaze following in human infants depends on communicative signals. Current Biology, 18: 668–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Serpell, J. & Hsu, Y. (2005). Effects of breed, sex, and neuter status on trainability in dogs. Anthrozoos, 18: 196–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, K., Bessa, J. & de Sousa, L. (2012). Auditory contagious yawning in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris): first evidence for social modulation. Animal Cognition, 15: 721–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slabbert, J. M. & Rasa, O. A. E. (1997). Observational learning of an acquired maternal behavior pattern by working dog pups: an alternative training method? Applied Animal Behavior Science, 53: 309–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soproni, K., Miklósi, A., Tópal, J. & Csanyi, V. (2001). Comprehension of human communicative signs in pet dogs (Canis familiaris). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 115: 122–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soproni, K., Miklósi, A., Tópal, J. & Csanyi, V. (2002). Dogs’ (Canis familiaris) responsiveness to human pointing gestures. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 116: 27–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spence, K. W. (1997). Experimental studies of learning and higher mental processes in infra-human primates. Psychological Bulletin, 34: 806–850.Google Scholar
Szetei, V., Miklósi, A., Tópal, J. & Csanyi, V. (2003). When dogs seem to lose their nose: an investigation on the use of visual and olfactory cues in communicative context between dog and owner. Applied Animal Behavior Science, 83: 141–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tauzin, T., Csík, A., Kis, A. & Topál, J. (2015). What or where? The meaning of referential human pointing for dogs (Canis familiaris). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 129: 334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tennie, C., Glabsch, E., Tempelmann, S., Bräuer, J., Kaminski, J. & Call, J. (2009). Dogs, Canis familiaris, fail to copy intransitive actions in third-party contextual imitation tasks. Animal Behavior, 77: 1491–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorndike, E. L. (1898). Animal intelligence: an experimental study of the associative process in animals. Psychological Review Monograph, 2: 8.Google Scholar
Thorpe, W. H. (1956). Learning and Instinct in Animals. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Thornton, A. & Mcauliffe, K. (2006). Teaching in wild meerkats. Science, 313: 227–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tinbergen, N. (1963). On aims and methods of ethology. Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie, 20: 410–33.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M., Hare, B. & Agnetta, B. (1999) Chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes, follow gaze direction geometrically. Animal Behaviour, 58: 769–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tópal, J., Byrne, R. W., Miklósi, A. & Csányi, V. (2006). Reproducing human actions and action sequences: “Do as I Do!” in a dog. Animal Cognition, 9: 355–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tòpal, J., Gácsi, M., Miklósi, Á., Virányi, Z., Kubinyi, E. & Csányi, V. (2005). Attachment to humans: a comparative study on hand-reared wolves and differently socialized dog puppies. Animal Behaviour, 70: 1367–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Topál, J., Gergely, G., Erdohegyi, Á., Csibra, G. & Miklósi, Á. (2009b). Differential sensitivity to human communication in dogs, wolves, and human infants. Science, 325: 1269–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tópal, J., Miklósi, Á. & Csányi, V. (1997). Dog-human relationship affects problem solving behavior in the dog. Anthrozoös, 10: 214–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tópal, J., Miklósi, Á., Csányi, V. & Doka, A. (1998). Attachment behavior in dogs (Canis familiaris): a new application of Ainsworth's (1969) Strange Situation Test. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 112: 219–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tópal, J., Miklósi, A., Gácsi, M. et al. (2009a). The dog as a model for understanding human social behavior. Advances in the Study of Behaviour, 39: 71–116.Google Scholar
Triesch, J., Teuscher, C., Teak, G. & Carlson, E. (2006) Gaze following: why (not) learning it? Developmental Science, 9: 125–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trut, L. N. (1999). Early canid domestication: the farm-fox experiment: foxes bred for tamability in a 40-year experiment exhibit remarkable transformations that suggest an interplay between behavioral genetics and development. American Scientist, 87: 160–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Udell, M. A. R., Dorey, N. R. & Wynne, C. D. L. (2010). What did domestication do to dogs? A new account of dogs’ sensitivity to human actions. Biological Reviews, 85: 327–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Udell, M. A. R., Spencer, J. M., Dorey, N. R. & Wynne, C. D. L. (2012). Human-socialized wolves follow diverse human gestures … and they may not be alone. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 25: 97–117.Google Scholar
Virányi, Z., Gácsi, M., Kubinyi, E. et al. (2008b). Comprehension of human pointing gestures in young human-reared wolves and dogs. Animal Cognition, 11: 373–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Virányi, Z., Range, F. & Huber, L. (2008a). Attentiveness toward others and social learning in domestic dogs. In Learning from Animals? eds. Röska-Hardy, L. N.-H. & Neumann-Held, E. M.. London: Psychology Press, p. 280.Google Scholar
Viranyi, Z., Tópal, J., Gácsi, M., Miklósi, A. & Csanyi, V. (2004). Dogs respond appropriately to cues of humans’ attentional focus. Behavioral Processes, 66: 161–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Viranyi, Z., Tópal, J., Miklósi, A. & Csanyi, V. (2006). A nonverbal test of knowledge attribution: a comparative study on dogs and children. Animal Cognition, 9: 13–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallis, L. J., Range, F., Müller, C. A., Serisier, S., Huber, L. & Virányi, Z. (2014) Lifespan development of attentiveness in domestic dogs: drawing parallels with humans. Frontiers in Psychology, 5: 71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallis, L. J., Range, F., Müller, C. A., Serisier, S., Huber, L. & Virányi, Z. (2015) Training for eye contact modulates gaze following in dogs. Animal Behaviour, 106: 27–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Werhahn, G., Virányi, Z., Barrera, G., Sommese, A., & Range, F. (2016). Wolves (Canis lupus) and dogs (Canis familiaris) differ in following human gaze into distant space but respond similar to their packmates’ gaze. Journal of Comparative Psychology: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/com0000036.CrossRef
Whiten, A. (1996). When does smart behavior-reading become mind-reading? In Theories of Theories of Mind, eds. Carruthers, P. & Smith, P. K.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 390.Google Scholar
Wobber, V., Hare, B., Koler-Matznick, J., Wrangham, R. & Tomasello, M. (2009). Breed differences in domestic dogs’ (Canis familiaris) comprehension of human communicative signals. Interaction Studies, 10: 206–24.Google Scholar
Wynne, C. D. L., Udell, M. A. R. & Lord, K. A. (2008). Ontogeny's impact on human–dog communication. Animal Behaviour, 76: e1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yin, S. & McCowan, B. (2004). Barking in domestic dogs: context specificity and individual identification. Animal Behaviour, 68: 343–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoon, J. M. D. & Tennie, C. (2010). Contagious yawning: a reflection of empathy, mimicry, or contagion? Animal Behaviour, 79: e1–3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×