from Part II - Intelligence
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2016
Questions
(1) Why does astronomy need a meta-theory – which is to say, need heuristics?
(2) How do the heuristics of astronomy differ from its theory-embedded concepts?
Thus far, most of this book has been a contribution to the science of individual differences in intelligence. Previously, I have contributed to the science of how cognitive abilities alter over time. I will now venture into the theory of intelligence, partially for its own sake and partially to put my contributions into context.
I want to show that every science needs something I call a meta-theory just as much as it needs fertile scientific theories and, indeed, that there is a relationship between the two. The latter explain and predict phenomena, whether they pertain to the motions of the planets or to intelligent human behavior. The former consists of one or more heuristics – which is to say, concepts that offer advice to theory builders. This advice can be good or bad in the sense that it can set strictures on scientific theories that limit their explanatory potential. The quality of the meta-theory should be measured in terms of the quality of the scientific theories it engenders. In addition, there must be a body of data that allows both verification and falsification. This last is not passive. Some times new data emerge that signal either a flaw in an existing theory and, therefore, the need for a new theory, or the need for a new meta-theory because it appears that current heuristics are giving bad advice about theory building.
I will begin by demonstrating the need for meta-theory even in the most rigorous of the sciences: astronomy, as inclusive of physics and cosmology. When we review the history of astronomy, we will find that the failure to realize that every science has a meta-theory encourages three kinds of error:
(1) There is a failure to face the fact that new evidence shows that a hitherto successful theory needs to be revised (type-one error). Often this occurs simply because scientists, like anyone else, are reluctant to embrace new ideas. But sometimes, it is because you are under the spell of a heuristic that makes new theories seem “impossible.”
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.