Berchman, Robert M. 1988a. ‘Arcana Mundi: Prophecy and Divination in De Vita Mosis of Philo of Alexandria’. Society of Biblical Literature 27: 385–423.Google Scholar

Berchman, Robert M. 1988b. ‘Arcana Mundi between Balaam and Hecate: Prophecy, Divination, and Magic in Later Platonism’. Society of Biblical Literature 28: 107–85.Google Scholar

Boys-Stones, George. 2017. Platonist Philosophy 80 BC to AD 250: An Introduction and Collection of Sources in Translation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burkhardt, Helmut. 1988. Die Inspiration heiliger Schriften bei Philo von Alexandrien. Basel: Brunnen Verlag.Google Scholar

Calabi, Francesca. 2000. ‘Galeno e Mosè’. Ricerche Storico Filosofiche 55: 535–46.Google Scholar

Calabi, Francesca. 2008. ‘Dio e l’ordine del mondo in Filone di Alessandria’. Études Platoniciennes 5: 23–39.Google Scholar

Calabi, Francesca. 2014.‘Lettera e allegoria in Filone di Alessandria’. In Loredana, R. and Iozzia, Daniele (eds.), ΚΑΛΛΟΣ ΚΑΙ ΑΡΕΤΗ: Bellezza e virtù: Studi in onore di Maria Barbanti. Acireale-Rome: Bonanno. pp. 277–84.Google Scholar

Cepolid, Maria Grazia. 1985. ‘Giudaismo ed ellenismo: Il kairos della salvezza in Filone di Alessandria’. Archivio di filosofia 53: 209–19.Google Scholar

Chadwick, Henry. 1967. ‘Philo and the Beginning of Christian Thought’. In Armstrong, Arthur H. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Later Greek and Early Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 133–92.Google Scholar

Colson, Francis H. and Whitaker, George H.. 1929–1962. Philo: Twelve Volumes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Daniélou, Jean. 1958. Philon d’Alexandrie. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar

Dillon, John. 1996. The Middle-Platonists: A Study of Platonism: 80 BC to AD 220. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Lampe, Geoffrey H. 1977. God as Spirit: The Bampton Lectures 1976. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Levison, John R. 1995a. ‘The Prophetic Spirit as an Angel According to Philo’. The Harvard Theological Review 88: 189–207.Google Scholar

Levison, John R. 1995b. ‘Inspiration and the Divine Spirit in the Writings of Philo Judaeus’. Journal for the Study of Judaism in the Persian, Hellenistic, and Roman Period 26: 271–323.Google Scholar

Lévy, Carlos. 1997. ‘De Chrysippe à Posidonius: variations stoiciennes sue le thème de la divination’. In Heintz, Jean-Georges (ed.), Oracles et prophéties dans l’antiquité: Actes du Colloque de Strasbourg (15–17 juin 1995). Paris: De Boccard, pp. 321–43.Google Scholar

Niehoff, Maren R. 2018. Philo of Alexandria: An Intellectual Biography. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Opsomer, Jan. 2009. ‘M. Annius Ammonius, a Philosophical Profile’. In Bonazzi, Mauro and Opsomer, Jan (eds.), The Origins of the Platonic System: Platonisms of the Early Empire and Their Philosophical Contexts. Leuven: Peeters, pp. 123–86.Google Scholar

Pietersma, Albert and Wright, Benjamin G.. 2007. A New English Translation of the Septuagint: And the Other Greek Translations Traditionally Included Under That Title. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Reiling, Jesco. 1971. ‘The Use of ψευδοπροφήτης in the Septuagint, Philo and Josephus’. Novum Testamentum 13: 147–56.Google Scholar

Runia, David T. 2000. ‘Philo the Theologian’. In Hart, Trevor A. (ed.), The Dictionary of Historical Theology. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, pp. 424–6.Google Scholar

Simonetti, Elsa Giovanna. 2020. ‘Who Is the Best Prophet? The “Manifold” Character of a Quotation in Plutarch’. In Vamvouri-Rouffi, Maria, Hirsch-Luipold, Reiner, and Schmidt, Thomas (eds.), The Dynamics of Intertextuality in Plutarch. Leiden: Brill, pp. 349–61.Google Scholar

Sterling, Gregory E. 2016. ‘When East and West Meet: Eastern Religions and Western Philosophy in Philo of Alexandria and Plutarch of Chaeronea’. Studia Philonica 28: 137–50.Google Scholar

Thackeray, Henry St. John. 1930. Josephus: Jewish Antiquities, Vol. 1: Books 1–3. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

von Arnim, Johannes. 1903–1924. Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar

Winston, David. 1989. ‘Two Types of Mosaic Prophecy According to Philo’. Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha 4: 49–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yonge, Charles D. 1993. The Works of Philo, Complete and Unabridged. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers.Google Scholar

Adler, Ada (ed.). (1935). Suidae Lexicon, vol. IV. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar

Augustinianum 29 = 1989. Sogni, visioni e profezie nell’Antico Cristianesimo, XVII Incontro di studiosi dell’Antichità Cristiana. Rome, 5–7 May 1987 [Conference proceedings.]Google Scholar

Aune, David E. 1983. Prophecy in Early Christianity and the Ancient Mediterranean World. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.Google Scholar

Aussedat, Mathilde and Cassin, Matthieu. 2010. “Le prologue du Commentaire sur les petits prophètes de Théophylacte d’Achrida.” Revue des études byzantines 68: 61–93.Google Scholar

Bach, Valérie. 2007. Les clefs des songes médiévales (XIII^e–XV^e siècles). Strasbourg: Presses Universitaires de Strasbourg.Google Scholar

Boulnois, Marie-Odile. 2018. “Statut et fonction de la prophétie. Exégèse de 2 Pierre 1, 19–21 chez les auteurs chrétiens des cinq premiers siècles.” in Arnold, Matthieu, Dahan, Gilbert, and Noblesse-Rocher, Annie (eds.), 2 Pierre 1, 19–21. Inspiration de l’Écriture, liberté de l’exégèse. Paris: Cerf, pp. 43–107.Google Scholar

Bovon, François. 2003. “These Christians Who Dream: The Authority of Dreams in the First Centuries of Christianity.” In Bovon, François, Studies in Early Christianity. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, pp. 144–62.Google Scholar

Brisson, Luc, Seamus, O’Neill, and Timotin, Andrei (eds.). 2018. Neoplatonic Demons and Angels (Studies in Platonism, Neoplatonism, and the Platonic Tradition 20). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Cox Miller, Patricia. 1986. “‘A Dubious Twilight’: Reflections on Dream in Patristic Literature.” Church History 55: 153–64.Google Scholar

Dagron, Gilbert. 1985. “Rêver de Dieu et parler de soi. Le rêve et son interprétation d’après les sources byzantines.” In Gregory, Tullio (ed.), I sogni nel medioevo, Seminario internazionale, Roma 2–4 ottobre. Rome: Edizioni dell’Ateneo, pp. 37–55.Google Scholar

Dautzenberg, Gerhard. 1975. Urchristliche Prophetie: Ihre Erforschung, ihre Voraussetzungen im Judentum und ihre Struktur im ersten Korintherbrief. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar

de Boor, C. (ed.). 1904. Georgii monachi chronicon. Leipzig: Teubner (²1978, corr. P. Wirth.)Google Scholar

Drexl, Franz. 1926. “Das Traumbuch des Propheten Daniel nach dem cod. Vatic. Palat. gr. 319.” Byzantinische Zeitschrift 29: 290–314.Google Scholar

Dulaey, Martine. 1973. Le rêve dans la vie et la pensée de Saint Augustin. Paris: Études augustiniennes.Google Scholar

Filoramo, Giovanni. 2007. “Profeti falsi e profeti veri da Plutarco a Celso.” In Cacciatore, Paola Volpe and Ferrari, Franco (eds.), Plutarco e la cultura della sua età. Atti del X convegno plutarcheo: Fisciano-Paestum, 27–29 ottobre 2005 (Collectanea, 25). Napoli: D’Auria, pp. 41–56.Google Scholar

Fischer, Steven R. 1982. The Complete Medieval Dreambook: A Multilingual, Alphabetical “Somniale Danielis” Collection. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Frenschkowski, Marco. 2018. Prophetie: Innovation, Tradition und Subversion in spätantiken Religionen (Standorte in Antike und Christentum 10). Stuttgart: Anton Hiersemann.Google Scholar

Guidorizzi, Giulio. 1977. “I prontuari oniromantici bizantini.” Rendiconti dell’Istituto Lombardo, Classe di Lettere, Scienza morali e storiche 111: 135–55.Google Scholar

Hahn, Johannes. 2003. “Weiser, göttlicher Mensch oder Scharlatan? Das Bild des Apollonius von Tyana bei Heiden und Christen.” In Aland, Barbara, Hahn, Johannes, and Ronning, Christian (eds.), Literarische Konstituierung von Identifikationsfiguren in der Antike. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, pp. 87–109.Google Scholar

Hvidt, Christian. 2007. Christian Prophecy: The Post-Biblical Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jones, Christopher P. 2006. “Apollonius of Tyana in Late Antiquity.” In Fitzgerald Johnson, Scott (ed.), Greek Literature in Late Antiquity: Dynamism, Didacticism, Classicism. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 49–64.Google Scholar

Le Boulluec, Alain. 2016. “Sur la doctrine du vrai prophète dans les écrits pseudo-clémentins.” In Amir-Moezzi, Mohammad Ali, De Cillis, Maria, De Smet, Daniel, and Mir-Kasimov, Orkhan (eds.), L’ésotérisme shi‘ite, ses racines et ses prolongements. Turnhout: Brepols, pp.139–62.Google Scholar

Le Goff, Jacques 1985. “Le christianisme et les rêves (II^e–VII^e s.),” in Gregory, Tullio (ed.), I sogni nel medioevo, Seminario internazionale, Roma 2–4 ottobre, 1983. Rome: Edizioni dell’Ateneo, pp. 171–218.Google Scholar

Magdalino, Paul. 2011. “Orthodoxy and History in Tenth-Century Byzantine ‘Encyclopedism.’” In Van Deun, Peter and Macé, Caroline (eds.), Encyclopedic Trends in Byzantium? Proceedings of the International Conference held in Leuven, 6–8 May 2009. Leuven: Peeters, pp. 143–60.Google Scholar

Magdalino, Paul. 2019. “Prophecy, Divination and the Church in Byzantium.” In Magdalino, Paul and Timotin, Andrei (eds.), Savoirs prédictifs et techniques divinatoires dans l’Antiquité tardive et à Byzance. Seyssel: La Pomme d’Or, pp. 185–202.Google Scholar

Magdalino, Paul and Timotin, Andrei (eds.) 2019. Savoirs prédictifs et techniques divinatoires dans l’Antiquité tardive et à Byzance. Seyssel: La Pomme d’Or.Google Scholar

Maraval, Pierre. 2017. “Gregory of Nyssa, Lettre sur la pythonisse.” In Lettre canonique. Lettre sur la pythonisse et six homélies pastorales: Introduction, traduction et notes. Paris: Cerf.Google Scholar

Martin, Lawrence T. 1981. Somniale Danielis: An Edition of a Medieval Dream Interpretation Handbook. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Mavroudi, Maria. 2002. A Byzantine Book on Dream Interpretation: The Oneirocriticon of Achmet and Its Arabic Sources. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Méhat, André. 1987. “Divination païenne et prophétie chrétienne: La Pythie, Origène et Saint Jean Chrysostome.” In Lies, Lothar (ed.), Origeniana Quarta: Die Referate des 4. Internationalen Origeneskongresses (Innsbruck, 2.–6. September 1985). Innsbruck: Tyrolia-Verlag, pp. 436–41.Google Scholar

Oberhelman, Steven M. 1991. The Oneirocriticon of Achmet: A Medieval Greek and Arabic Treatise on the Interpretation of Dreams. Lubbock, TX: Texas Tech University Press.Google Scholar

Oberhelman, Steven M. 2008. Dreambooks in Byzantium: Six Oneirocritica in Translation with Commentary and Introduction. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Oberhelman, Steven M. 2009. “Prolegomena to the Reconstruction of the Archetype of the Greek Somniale Danielis,” Quaderni di studi indo-mediterranei [= Sogni e visioni nel mondo indo-mediterraneo, 2: 107–24.Google Scholar

Oberhelman, Steven M. 2019. “How Popular Were the Byzantine Dreambooks? Divination and Byzantine Dreamers.” In Magdalino, Paul and Timotin, Andrei (eds.), Savoirs prédictifs et techniques divinatoires dans l’Antiquité tardive et à Byzance. Seyssel: La Pomme d’Or, pp. 401–33.Google Scholar

Pagels, Eliane H. 1973. “Origen and the Prophets of Israel: a Critique of Christian Typology.” The Gaster Festschrift: Journal of the Ancient Near Eastern Society of Columbia University 5: 335–44.Google Scholar

Papaconstantinou, Arietta. 2001. Le culte des saints en Égypte des Byzantins aux Abbasides. L’apport des inscriptions et des papyrus grecs et coptes. Paris: CNRS Éditions.Google Scholar

Peleanu, Adina. 2011. “Deux séries chrysostomiennes: Sur l’impuissance du diable et Sur l’obscurité des prophéties.” Revue d’études augustiniennes et patristiques 57: 89–108.Google Scholar

Satran, David. 1995. Biblical Prophets in Byzantine Palestine: Reassessing the Lives of the Prophets. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Speyer, Wolfgang. 1974. “Zum Bild des Apollonios von Tyana bei Heiden und Christen.” Jahrbuch für Antike und Christentum 17: 47–63.Google Scholar

Sütterlin-Aussedat, Mathilde. 2006. Les chaînes exégétiques grecques sur le livre de Jérémie (chap 1–4). Présentation, édition critique, traduction française, commentaire (PhD thesis, 2 vols., Université de Paris IV).Google Scholar

Timotin, Andrei. 2012. La démonologie platonicienne: Histoire de la notion de daimôn de Platon aux derniers néoplatoniciens. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Timotin, Andrei. 2016. “Techniques d’interprétation dans les clés des songes byzantines.” In Carroy, Jacqueline and Lancel, Juliette (eds.), Clés des songes et sciences des rêves de l’Antiquité à Freud. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, pp. 47–60.Google Scholar

Timotin, Andrei. 2019. “Divination et providence dans le néoplatonisme tardif (Jamblique et Proclus).” In Magdalino, Paul and Timotin, Andrei (eds.), Savoirs prédictifs et techniques divinatoires dans l’Antiquité tardive et à Byzance. Seyssel: La Pomme d’Or, pp. 71–97.Google Scholar

Van den Ven, Paul (ed.). 1970. La Vie ancienne de S. Syméon Stylite le Jeune (521–592). Brussels: Société des Bollandistes.Google Scholar

Athanassiadi, Polymnia. 1999. ‘The Chaldean Oracles.’ In Athanassiadi, Polymnia and Frede, Michael (eds.), Pagan Monotheism in Late Antiquity. Oxford University Press, pp. 149–83.Google Scholar

Athanassiadi, Polymnia. 2006. La lutte pour l’orthodoxie dans le platonisme tardif. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

Beatrice, Pier Franco. 1992. ‘Porphyry’s Judgment on Origen.’ In Daly, Robert (ed.), Origeniana V. Leuven: Peeters, pp. 351–67.Google Scholar

Beatrice, Pier Franco. 2019. ‘Porphyry at Origen’s School at Caesarea.’ In Bitton-Ashkelony, Brouria, Irshai, Oded, Kofsky, Aryeh, Newman, Hillel, and Perrone, Lorenzo (eds.), Origeniana Duodecima: Origen’s Legacy in the Holy Land. Leuven: Peeters, pp. 267–84.Google Scholar

Beerden, Kim. 2013. Worlds Full of Signs: Ancient Greek Divination in Context. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Behr, John. 2018. Origen: First Principles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Boersma, Hans. 2017. Scripture as a Real Presence: Sacramental Exegesis in the Early Church. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker.Google Scholar

Böhm, Thomas. 2002. ‘Origenes – Theologe und (Neu-)Platoniker?’ Adamantius 8: 7–23.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, Mauro and Helmig, Christoph (eds.). 2007. Platonic Stoicism – Stoic Platonism. The Dialogue between Platonism and Stoicism in Antiquity. Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, Mauro, Lévy, Carlos, and Steel, Carlos (eds.). 2007. A Platonic Pythagoras. Studies on Platonism and Pythagoreanism in the Imperial Age. Turnhout: Brepols.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonazzi, Mauro and Opsomer, Jan (eds.). 2009. The Origins of the Platonic System: Platonisms of the Early Empire and their Philosophical Contexts. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar

Boyarin, Daniel. 2004. ‘By Way of Apology: Dawson, Edwards, Origen.’ Studia Philonica Annual 16: 188–217.Google Scholar

Bryan, Jenny, Wardy, Robert, and Warren, James (eds.). 2018. Authors and Authorities in Ancient Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Chiaradonna, Riccardo. 2015. ‘Plotinus’ Account of Demiurgic Causation and Its Philosophical Background.’ In Marmodoro, Anna and Prince, Brian (eds.), Causation and Creation in Late Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 31–50.Google Scholar

Clark, Stephen. 2021. ‘Plotinus, Eriugena and the Uncreated Image.’ In Eriugena’s Christian Neoplatonism and its Sources in Patristic Philosophy and Ancient Philosophy, dir. Ilaria Ramelli, Oxford University, October 2021. Leuven: Peeters, pp. 33–50.Google Scholar

Digeser, Elizabeth. 2016. ‘The Usefulness of Borderlands Concepts in Ancient History.’ In North, Michael and Lee, John (eds.), Globalizing Borderland Studies. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, pp. 15–32.Google Scholar

Digeser, Elizabeth, Marx-Wolf, Heidi, and Ramelli, Ilaria L. E.. (eds.). in press. Problems in Ancient Biography: The Construction of Professional Identity in Late Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dixon, Edward. 2009. ‘Descending Spirit and Descending Gods: A “Greek” Interpretation of the Spirit’s “Descent as a Dove” in Mark 1:10.’ Journal of Biblical Literature 128: 759–80.Google Scholar

Doerrie, Heinrich. 1976. Platonica Minora. Munich: Fink.Google Scholar

Döpp, Siegmar. 2018. ‘Calcidius.’ In Riedweg, Christoph, Christoph, Horn, and Dietmar, Wyrwa (eds.), Die Philosophie der Antike 5: Philosophie der Kaiserzeit und der Spätantike. Basel: Schwabe, pp. 2327–30.Google Scholar

Dorival, Gilles. 2017. ‘Continuités et innovations de l’écriture théologique des Pères grecs.’ In Pouderon, Bernard and Usacheva, Anna (eds.), Dire Dieu: Principes méthodologiques de l’écriture sur Dieu en patristique. Paris: Beauchesne, pp. 35–44.Google Scholar

Edwards, Mark. 2013. Image, Word and God in the Early Christian Centuries. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Engberg-Pedersen, Troels. 2017. ‘Introduction: A Historiographical Essay.’ In Engberg-Pedersen, Troels (ed.), From Stoicism to Platonism: The Development of Philosophy, 100 BCE–100 CE. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar

Erler, Michael, Heßler, Jan Erik, and Petrucci, Federico M.. 2021. Authority and Authoritative Texts in the Platonist Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fattal, Michel. 2014. Du Logos de Plotin au Logos de saint Jean. Paris: Cerf.Google Scholar

Fauquier, Frédéric. 2018. Le Parménide au miroir des platonismes: logique, ontologie, théologie. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

Fernández, Samuel. 2017. ‘The Pedagogical Structure of Origen’s De principiis.’ In Ramelli, Ilaria (ed.), in collaboration with Corrigan, Kevin, Maspero, Giulio and Tobon, Monica, Evagrius between Origen, the Cappadocians, and Neoplatonism. Leuven: Peeters, pp. 15–22.Google Scholar

Gersh, Stephen. 1986. Middle Platonism and Neoplatonism: The Latin Tradition. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar

Hadot, Pierre. 1987. ‘Théologie, exégèse, révélation, écriture dans la philosophie grecque.’ In Tardieu, Michel (ed.), Les règles de l’interprétation. Paris: Cerf, pp. 13–34.Google Scholar

Johnson, Aaron. 2013. Religion and Identity in Porphyry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lacroix, Francis and Narbonne, Jean-Marc. (eds.). 2019. Introduction and Commentary to Plotinus’ Treatise 33 (II 9) Against the Gnostics and Related Studies. Québec: Presses de l’Université de Laval.Google Scholar

Männlein-Robert, Irmgard, and Riedweg, Christoph. 2018. ‘Hauptsächliche literarische Gattungen philosophischer Wissensvermittlung und Methoden der Textinterpretation in historischer Perspektive.’ In Männlein-Robert, Irmgard and Riedweg, Christoph (eds.), Philosophie der Kaiserzeit und der Spätantike. Basel: Schwabe, pp. 64–8.Google Scholar

Markschies, Christoph. 2007. Origenes und sein Erbe. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Marx, Heidi. 2016. Spiritual Taxonomies and Ritual Authority: Platonists, Priests, and Gnostics in the Third Century CE. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar

Mitchell, Margaret. 2004. ‘Epiphanic Evolutions in Earliest Christianity’. Illinois Classical Studies 29: 183–20.Google Scholar

Moss, Candida. 2004. ‘The Transfiguration: An Exercise in Markan Accommodation.’ Biblical Interpretation 12: 69–89.Google Scholar

Narbonne, Jean-Marc. 2011. Plotinus in Dialogue with the Gnostics. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nobili, Cecilia. 2019. ‘Delphi and the Nostalgic Evocation of Classical Greece.’ Ancient Narrative 16: 1–22.Google Scholar

Ober, Joshua. 2022. The Greeks and the Rational: The Discovery of Practical Reason. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Opsomer, Jan. 2018. ‘Proclus and the Authority of Plato.’ In Tarrant, Harold (ed.), Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Plato in Antiquity. Leiden: Brill, pp. 498–514.Google Scholar

Potter, David. 2015. ‘Chaldaean Oracles.’ Oxford Classical Dictionary. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199381135.013.1509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. 2005. ‘Nostra autem conversatio in caelis est.’Sileno 31: 139–58.Google Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. 2006a. Il βασιλεύς come νόμος ἔμψυχος. Naples: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. 2006b. Tutti i commenti a Marziano Capella. Milan: Bompiani.Google Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria L. E. 2007. ‘Christian Soteriology and Christian Platonism: Origen, Gregory of Nyssa, and the Biblical and Philosophical Basis of the Doctrine of Apokatastasis.’ Vigiliae Christianae 61: 313–56.Google Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. 2008a. ‘Philosophical Allegoresis of Scripture in Philo and its Legacy in Gregory of Nyssa.’ Studia Philonica Annual 20: 55–99.Google Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. 2008b. Stoici romani minori. Milan: Bompiani.Google Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. 2009a. ‘Origen, Bardaisan, and the Origin of Universal Salvation.’ Harvard Theological Review 102: 135–68.Google Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. 2009b. ‘Origen, Patristic Philosophy, and Christian Platonism: Re-Thinking the Christianisation of Hellenism.’ Vigiliae Christianae 63: 217–63.Google Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. 2009–19. Bardaisan of Edessa, Piscataway: Gorgias. Berlin: DeGruyter.Google Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. 2011a. ‘Origen’s Anti-Subordinationism and Its Heritage.’ Vigiliae Christianae 65: 21–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. 2011b. ‘Origen the Christian Middle/Neoplatonist: New Arguments for a Possible Identification.’ Journal of Early Christian History 1: 98–130.Google Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. 2011c. ‘The Philosophical Stance of Allegory in Stoicism and its Reception in Platonism, “Pagan” and Christian.’ International Journal of the Classical Tradition 18: 335–71.Google Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. 2012a. ‘Mara Bar Serapion: Comments on the Syriac Edition, Translation, and Notes by David Rensberger.’ In Merz, Annette and Tieleman, Teun (eds.), The Letter of Mara bar Serapion in Context. Leiden: Brill, pp. 205–31.Google Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. 2012b. ‘Origen, Greek Philosophy, and the Birth of the Trinitarian Meaning of Hypostasis.’ Harvard Theological Review 105: 302–50.Google Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. 2013. The Christian Doctrine of Apokatastasis: A Critical Assessment. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. 2014. ‘Valuing Antiquity in Antiquity by Means of Allegoresis.’ In Ker, James and Pieper, Christoph (eds.), Valuing the Past in the Greco-Roman World: Proceedings from the Penn-Leiden Colloquia on Ancient Values VII. Leiden: Brill, pp. 485–507.Google Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. 2015. ‘Proclus and Christian Neoplatonism.’ In Knežević, Mikonja (ed.), The Ways of Byzantine Philosophy. Alhambra, CA: Sebastian Press, pp. 37–70.Google Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. 2016a. ‘Origen’s Allegoresis of Plato’s and Scripture’s Myths.’ In Desrosiers, Nathaniel P. and Vuong, Lily C. (eds.), Religious Competition in the Greco-Roman World. Atlanta: SBL, pp. 85–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. 2016b. Social Justice and the Legitimacy of Slavery. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. 2017a. ‘Origen and the Platonic Tradition.’ In Warren, J. Smith, (ed.), Plato and Christ: Platonism in Early Christian Theology, Religions, 8(2)21: 1–20.Google Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. 2017b. ‘Proclus of Constantinople and Apokatastasis.’ In Butorac, David and Layne, Danielle (eds.), Proclus and His Legacy. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 95–122.Google Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. 2018a. ‘Origen.’ In Marmodoro, Anna and Cartwright, Sophie (eds.), A History of Mind and Body in Late Antiquity. Cambridge University Press, pp. 245–66.Google Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. 2018b. ‘Origen to Evagrius,’ in Tarrant, Harold, Baltzly, Dirk, Layne, Danielle and Renaud, François (eds.), Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Plato in Antiquity. Leiden: Brill, pp. 271–91.Google Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. 2018c. ‘The Role of Allegory, Allegoresis, and Metaphor in Paul and Origen.’ Journal of Graeco-Roman Christianity and Judaism 14: 130–57.Google Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. 2019a. ‘Autobiographical Self-Fashioning in Origen.’ In Niehoff, Maren, Levinson, Joshua (eds.), Self, Self-Fashioning and Individuality in Late Antiquity. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, pp. 273–92.Google Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. 2019b. ‘Philo’s Dialectics of Apophatic Theology, His Strategy of Differentiation, and His Impact on Patristic Exegesis and Theology.’ Philosophy 3: 36–92.Google Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. 2020a. ‘Epicureanism and Early Christianity.’ In Mitsis, Phillip (ed.), Oxford Handbook to Epicurus and Epicureanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 582–612.Google Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. 2020b. ‘The Father in the Son, the Son in the Father in the Gospel of John: Sources and Reception of Dynamic Unity in Middle and Neoplatonism, “Pagan” and Christian.’ Journal of the Bible and its Reception 7: 31–66.Google Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. 2020c. ‘The Logos/Nous One-Many between “Pagan” and Christian Platonism.’ In Brian, Nicholas Baker, Lössl, Josef, and Vinzent, Markus (eds.), Studia Patristica CII. Leuven: Peeters, pp. 175–204.Google Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. 2020d. ‘Making the Bible World Literature: The Vulgate and Ancient Versions.’ In Ramelli, Ilaria and Denecke, Wiebke (eds.), Wiley-Blackwell Companion to World Literature. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 267–79.Google Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. 2020e. ‘Time and Eternity.’ In The Routledge Companion to Early Christian Philosophy. Oxford: Routledge, pp. 41–54.Google Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. 2021a. ‘City, Motherhood, and Parenthood in the Ideal Politeia in Plato and the first Stoics: The Problem of Oikeiosis and Later Developments.’ In Pedrucci, Giulia (ed.), Mothering(s) and Religions. Rome: Scienze e Lettere, pp. 257–76.Google Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. 2021b. ‘From God to God: Eriugena’s Protology and Eschatology against the Backdrop of His Platonic Patristic Sources.’ In Eriugena’s Christian Neoplatonism and Its Sources in Patristic Philosophy and Ancient Philosophy, dir. Ilaria Ramelli, Oxford University. Leuven: Peeters, pp. 99–123.Google Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. 2021c. ‘Origen’s Exegesis of the Bible against the Backdrop of Ancient Philosophy and Hellenistic and Rabbinic Judaism.’ Main lecture at The Bible: Its Translations and Interpretations in the Patristic Time, KUL 16–17 October 2019. Studia Patristica 103, 13–58.Google Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. 2021d. ‘“Pagan” and Christian Platonism in Dionysius: The Double-Reference Scheme and Its Meaning.’ In Lauritzen, Frederick and Klitenic Wear, Sarah (eds.), Byzantine Platonists 284–1453. Steubenville, OH: Franciscan University Press, pp. 92–112.Google Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. 2021e. ‘The Question of Origen’s Conversion and His Philosophico-Theological Lexicon of Epistrophē.’ In Wallace, James and Despotis, Athanasios (eds.), Greek and Byzantine Philosophical Exegesis. Leiden: Brill, pp. 61–108.Google Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. 2021f. ‘The Reception of Paul’s Nous in the Christian Platonism of Origen and Evagrius.’ In Frey, Jörg and Nägele, Manuel (eds.), Der νοῦς bei Paulus (WUNT 464). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, pp. 279–316.Google Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. 2021g. ‘Soma (Σῶμα).’ In Das Reallexikon für Antike und Christentum 30. Stuttgart: Hiersemann, pp. 814–47.Google Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. 2021h. ‘Stoic Homeric Allegoresis.’ In Manolea, Christina (ed.), Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Homer from the Hellenistic Age to Late Antiquity. Leiden: Brill, pp. 229–58.Google Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. 2021i. ‘The Study of Late Ancient Philosophy: Philosophy and Religion – “Pagan” and Christian Platonism.’ In Griffin, Svetla S. and Ramelli, Ilaria (eds.), Lovers of the Soul and Lovers of the Body. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 397–402.Google Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. 2022a. ‘The Legacy of Origen in Gregory of Nyssa’s Theology of Freedom.’ Modern Theology 38.2: 363–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. 2022b. ‘Origen, Evagrius, and Dionysius.’ In Edwards, Mark, Pallis, Dimitrios, and Steiris, Georgios (eds.), Oxford Handbook to Dionysius the Areopagite. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 94–108.Google Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. 2024. ‘Secular and Christian Commentaries in Late Antiquity.’ In Gavin, Kelly and Pelttari, Aaron (eds.), The Cambridge History of Later Latin Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. 2022c. ‘Allegorising and Philosophising.’ In Smith, Scott and Trzaskoma, Stephen (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Greek and Roman Mythography. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 331–48.Google Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. 2023. “Calcidius’ Identity and Origen,” Eirene 59.Google Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. In press b. ‘Christian Slavery in Theology and Practice.’ In Longenecker, Bruce and Wilhite, David (eds.), The Cambridge History of Ancient Christianity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. In press c. ‘The Construction of the Professional Identity of Origen of Alexandria.’ In DePalma Digeser, Elizabeth, Marx, Heidi, and Ramelli, Ilaria L. E. (eds.), Problems in Ancient Biography: The Construction of Professional Identity in Late Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. In press d. ‘Esoteric Interpretations of Scripture in Philo (and Hellenistic Judaism), Clement, and Origen.’ In Mayer, Toby (ed.), Esoteric Cultures of Scripture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. In press e. ‘Jesus of Nazareth.’ In The Oxford Classical Dictionary, digital edition.Google Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. In press f. ‘The Logos in the Johannine Prologue and Its Philosophical Reception.’ In Stanley, Porter and Andrew, Pitts (eds.), Johannine Prologue and Its Resonances. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. In press g. ‘Matter in the Dialogue of Adamantius: Origen’s Heritage and Hylomorphism.’ In Zachhuber, Johannes (ed.), Cosmology in Late Ancient Thought. Leiden: Brill, pp. 74–124.Google Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. In press h. ‘Philo’s Reception in Augustine.’ In Friesen, Courtney, Lincicum, David, and Runia, David (eds.), The Reception of Philo of Alexandria. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria. In press i. ‘The Relevance of Greco-Roman Literary Themes to NT Interpretation: The Theme of Slavery and Freedom – Gal 3:28 and Relations to Gal 4.’ In The Cambridge Handbook of Historical Biblical Exegesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria, and Konstan, David. Terms for Eternity: aiônios and aïdios in Classical and Christian Texts. Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias Press, 2007; Berlin: De Gruyter, 2019.Google Scholar

Ratkowitsch, Christine. 1995. Die Cosmographia des Bernardus Silvestris. Cologne: Böhlau.Google Scholar

Reydams-Schils, Gretchen. 1999. Demiurge and Providence. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar

Reydams-Schils, Gretchen. 2007. ‘Plato’s Timaeus According to Calcidius.’ Phronesis 52: 301–27.Google Scholar

Reydams-Schils, Gretchen. 2020. Calcidius on Plato’s Timaeus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Runia, David T. 1993. Philo in Early Christian Literature. Assen: van Gorcum.Google Scholar

Saffrey, Henri Dominique. 1975. ‘Allusions antichrétiennes chez Proclus.’ Revue des sciences philosophiques et philologiques 59: 553–62.Google Scholar

Spanu, Nicola. 2020. Proclus and the Chaldean Oracles. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Stroumsa, Guy. 2016. The Scriptural Universe of Ancient Christianity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Tarrant, Harold. 2017. ‘Plotinus, Origenes and Ammonius on the King.’ In Petersen, Anders Klostergaard and van Kooten, George (eds.), Religio-Philosophical Discourses within the Greco-Roman, Jewish, and Early Christian World. Leiden: Brill, pp. 323–37.Google Scholar

Taylor, Joan E. and Ramelli, Ilaria L. E. (eds.) 2021. Patterns of Women’s Leadership in Ancient Christianity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Tzamalikos, Panayiotis. 2016. Anaxagoras, Origen, and Neoplatonism. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Van den Berg, Robbert. 2022. ‘Confusion and Sympathy: The Neoplatonic Proclus on the Aesthetics of Epiphany and Theurgic Union’. In Pachoumi, Eleni (ed.), Conceptualizing Divine Unions. Ancient Philosophy and Religion, vol. 7. Leiden: Brill, pp. 229–50.Google Scholar

Vigorelli, Ilaria. 2016. ‘σχέσις in Origen.’ In Jacobsen, Anders-Christian (ed.), Origeniana XI. Leuven: Peeters, pp. 887–96.Google Scholar

Waszink, Jan H. 1975. Timaeus a Calcidio translatus commentarioque instructus. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Yarbro Collins, Adela. 2000. ‘Mark and His Readers: The Son of God among the Greeks and Romans.’ The Harvard Theological Review 93: 86–91.Google Scholar

Addey, Crystal. 2011. ‘Book Review: Iamblichus’ Letters, Edited with a Translation and Commentary by John M. Dillon and Wolfgang Polleichtner.’ International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 5.2: 321–3.Google Scholar

Addey, Crystal. 2014. Divination and Theurgy in Neoplatonism: Oracles of the Gods. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Addey, Crystal. (ed.). 2022. Divination and Knowledge in Greco-Roman Antiquity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Athanassiadi, Polymnia. 1993. ‘Dreams, Theurgy and Freelance Divination: The Testimony of Iamblichus.’ Journal of Roman Studies 83: 115–30.Google Scholar

Babbit, Frank Cole. 1936 [2003]. Plutarch. De defectu oraculorum. De E apud Delphos. De Pythiae Oraculis. Moralia, vol. 5. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bettenson, Henry. 1972 [2003]. Augustine: Concerning the City of God against the Pagans. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Bidez, Josef. 1913 [1964]. Vie de Porphyre, le philosophe neo-platonicien. Ghent: E. van Goethem.Google Scholar

Blondell, R. 2002. The Play of Character in Plato’s Dialogues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bowden, Hugh. 2005. Classical Athens and the Delphic Oracle. Divination and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

John, Burnet. (ed.) 1900 [1967]. Platonis opera, vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Burns, Dylan M. 2020. ‘Alexander of Lycopolis and Titus of Bostra on Manichaeism and Providence.’ In Oerter, Wolf B. and Vitkova, Zuzana (eds.), Coptica, Gnostica und Mandaica: Sprache, Literatur und Kunst als Medien interreligiöser Begegnung(en). Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 141–53.Google Scholar

Bussanich, John. 2005. ‘Review article: Iamblichus: De Mysteriis. Translated by Emma C. Clarke, John M. Dillon and Jackson P. Hershbell. Iamblichus. De Anima. Text, Translation and Commentary by John M. Dillon and John F. Finamore.’ Ancient Philosophy 25(2): 478–94.Google Scholar

Cherniss, Harold. 1976. Plutarch. Moralia, Vol. XIII. Part 2: Stoic Essays. Against the Stoics on Common Conceptions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Clark, Gillian. 1999. ‘Translate into Greek: Porphyry of Tyre on the New Barbarians’. In Miles, R. (ed.), Constructing Identities in Late Antiquity. London: Routledge, pp. 112–32.Google Scholar

Clark, Gillian. 2007. ‘Augustine’s Porphyry and the Universal Way of Salvation.’ In Karamanolis, George and Sheppard, Anne (eds.), Studies on Porphyry. London: Institute of Classical Studies, pp. 127–40.Google Scholar

Clark, Gillian. 2009. ‘Can We Talk? Augustine and the Possibility of Dialogue.’ In Goldhill, Simon (ed.), The End of Dialogue in Antiquity. Cambridge University Press, pp. 117–54.Google Scholar

Clarke, Emma C. 2001. Iamblichus’ De Mysteriis: A Manifesto of the Miraculous. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Clarke, Emma C., Dillon, John, and Hershbell, Jackson P. (eds.). 2003. Iamblichus: On the Mysteries. Atlanta, GA: Society of Biblical Literature.Google Scholar

Des Places, Édouard (ed.). 1974–80. Eusèbe de Césarée: La Préparation Évangélique. Paris: Les Éditions du Cerf.Google Scholar

Dillon, John, and Hershbell, Jackson (eds.). 1991. Iamblichus. On the Pythagorean Way of Life (De Vita Pythagorica). Atlanta, GA: Society of Biblical Literature.Google Scholar

Dillon, John, and Polleichtner, Wolfgang (eds.). 2012. Iamblichus: Letters. Atlanta, GA: Society of Biblical Literature.Google Scholar

Dodds, Eric R. 1951. The Greeks and the Irrational. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Dombart, B., and Kalb, A (eds.). 1955. Augustine. De Civitate Dei. CCSL 47–8. Brepols: Turnhout.Google Scholar

Edwards, Mark. 2003. ‘Two Images of Pythagoras: Iamblichus and Porphyry’. In Blumenthal, Henry J. and Clark, Gillian (eds.), The Divine Iamblichus: Philosopher and Man of Gods. Bristol: Bristol Classical Press, pp. 159–72.Google Scholar

Edwards, Mark. 2007. ‘Porphyry and the Christians’. In Karamanolis, George and Sheppard, Anne (eds.), Studies on Porphyry. London: Institute of Classical Studies, pp. 111–26.Google Scholar

Gallop, David. 1991. Aristotle: On Sleep and Dreams. Warminster: Aris and Phillips.Google Scholar

Gifford, E. H. 1903 [1981]. Eusebius: Preparation for the Gospel. 2 vols. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker.Google Scholar

Girgenti, Giuseppe, and Muscolino, Giuseppe (eds). 2011. Porfirio: Filosofia Rivelata Dagli Oracoli. Milan: Bompiani.Google Scholar

Goldhill, Simon (ed.). 2009. The End of Dialogue in Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Goulet, R. (ed.) (2005). Dictionnaire des Philosophes Antiques 4: de Labeo à Ovidius. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar

Hammond, Carolyn J.-B. (ed.). 2016. Augustine. Confessions, Vol. II: Books 9–13. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Johnson, Aaron. 2013. Religion and Identity in Porphyry of Tyre: The Limits of Hellenism in Late Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Karamanolis, George, and Sheppard, Anne (eds.). 2007. Studies on Porphyry. London: Institute of Classical Studies.Google Scholar

Kindt, Julia. 2022. ‘The Enigmatic Divine Voice and the Problem of Human Misinterpretation’. In Addey, Crystal (ed.), Divination and Knowledge in Greco-Roman Antiquity. London: Routledge, pp. 30–49.Google Scholar

Long, Alex. 2009. ‘Plato’s Dialogues and a Common Rationale for Dialogue Form’. In Goldhill, Simon (ed.), The End of Dialogue in Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 45–59.Google Scholar

Louis, P. 1945. Albinus: Épitomé. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

Marchant, E. C. 1970. Xenophontis opera omnia, Vol. 4. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Marx-Wolf, Heidi. 2016. Spiritual Taxonomies and Ritual Authority: Platonists, Priests and Gnostics in the Third Century CE. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Mastandrea, Paolo. 1979. Un neoplatonico latino Cornelio Labeone (Testimonianze e frammenti). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

McCabe, Matt Jackson. 2004. ‘The Stoic Theory of Implanted Preconceptions’. Phronesis 147: 323–47.Google Scholar

Miles, Richard. 2009. ‘Let’s (Not) Talk about It’: Augustine and the Control of Epistolary Dialogue’. In Goldhill, Simon (ed.), The End of Dialogue in Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 135–48.Google Scholar

Miller Jones, Roger. 1980. The Platonism of Plutarch and Selected Papers. New York: Garland.Google Scholar

Nightingale, Andrea Wilson. 1995. Genres in Dialogue: Plato and the Construct of Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Parker, Robert. 1985. ‘Greek States and Greek Oracles’. History of Political Thought 6(1/2): 298–326.Google Scholar

Saffrey, Henri Dominique. 1971. ‘Abammon, Pseudonyme de Jamblique’. In Palmer, R. B. and Hamerton-Kelly, R. G. (eds.), Philomathes: Studies and Essays in the Humanities in Memory of Philip Merlan. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 227–39.Google Scholar

Saffrey, Henri Dominique, and Segonds, Alain-Philippe (eds.). 2012. Porphyre: Lettre à Anébon L’Égyptien. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

Saffrey, Henri Dominique, and Segonds, Alain-Philippe (eds.). 2013. Jamblique: Réponse à Porphyre (De mysteriis). Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

Shaw, Gregory. 1995. Theurgy and the Soul: The Neoplatonism of Iamblichus. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Shaw, Gregory. 2012. ‘The Role of Aesthesis in Theurgy’. In Afonasin, Eugene, Dillon, John, and Finamore, John F. (eds.), Iamblichus and the Foundations of Late Platonism. Leiden: Brill, pp. 91–112.Google Scholar

Simonetti, Elsa. 2017. A Perfect Medium? Oracular Divination in the Thought of Plutarch. Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar

Smith, Andrew. 1997. ‘Porphyry and Pagan Religious Practice’. In Cleary, John (ed.), The Perennial Tradition of Platonism. Leuven: Leuven University Press, pp. 29–35.Google Scholar

Smith, Andrew. 2007. ‘Porphyry: Scope for a Reassessment’. In Karamanolis, George and Sheppard, Anne (eds.), Studies on Porphyry. London: Institute of Classical Studies, pp. 7–16.Google Scholar

Struck, Peter. 2016. Divination and Human Nature: A Cognitive History of Intuition in Classical Antiquity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Szlezák, T. A. 2007. ‘Platonic Dialectic: The Path and the Goal’. In Corrigan, Kevin and Turner, John D. (eds.), Platonisms: Ancient, Modern and Postmodern. Leiden: Brill, pp. 17–40.Google Scholar

Tanaseanu-Döbler, Ilinca. 2013. Theurgy in Late Antiquity: The Invention of a Ritual Tradition. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.Google Scholar