Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T22:33:07.246Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Promoting racial diversity at work: Challenges and solutions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2010

William T. Bielby
Affiliation:
Professor of Sociology, University of Illinois Chicago
Arthur P. Brief
Affiliation:
University of Utah
Get access

Summary

From social stratification to workplace discrimination: Six decades of sociological inquiry

Studies of social class, social stratification, and social mobility – inquiries into how aspects of one's social origins facilitate or limit one's career success as an adult – have a long and distinguished history in American sociology, dating back to the 1940s (Davis and Moore, 1945; Warner, Meeker, and Bells, 1949; Gordon, 1949; 1958; Lipset and Bendix, 1959; Blau and Duncan, 1967). However, sociological scholarship on how workplace policies and practices limit or promote equal employment opportunity (“EEO”) is a relatively recent phenomenon, and the discipline all but ignored workplace racial bias prior to the 1970s.

It should be no surprise that American sociologists began to take notice of racial bias in employment around the same time as the rest of the country. The counts in Figure 3.1 are based on 80% or higher relevancy scores in a JSTOR search in the discipline's premier journals, American Sociological Review and American Journal of Sociology for the terms “race or racial” and “discrimination or bias” and “employment or jobs or careers” and “organization or firm or workplace.” Similar patterns to those in Figure 3.1 are evident when I include other journals or somewhat broader search terms. The civil rights and student movements, urban unrest, and landmark legislation of the 1960s motivated sociological inquiry in much the same way it shaped political discourse.

Type
Chapter
Information
Diversity at Work , pp. 53 - 86
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrahamson, E., and Fombrun, C. J. (1994). Macrocultures: Determinants and consequences. Academy of Management Review, 19, 728–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aronson, D. (2002). Managing the diversity revolution: Best practices for 21st century business. Civil Rights Journal, 6 (Winter 2002), 46–71.Google Scholar
Arvey, R. D., and Faley, R. J. (1992). Fairness in Selecting Employees, 3rd edn. New York: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Babcock, P. (2006) Detecting hidden bias. HR Magazine, 51 (February).
Barnett, W. P., Baron, J. N., and Stuart, T. E. (2000). Avenues of attainment: Occupational demography and organizational careers in the California Civil Service. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 88–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, J. N. (1991). Organizational evidence of ascription in labor markets. In Cornwall, R. and Wunnava, P. (eds.), New Approaches to Economic and Social Analyses of Discrimination (pp. 113–143). Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
Baron, J. N., Blake-Davis, A., and Bielby, W. T. (1986). The structure of opportunity: How promotion ladders vary within and among organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 248–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, J. N., and Newman, A. E. (1990). For what it's worth: Organizations, occupations, and the value of work done by women and nonwhites. American Sociological Review, 55, 155–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, J. N., and Pfeffer, J. (1994). The social psychology of organizations and inequality. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57, 190–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, E. M., Horan, P., and Tolbert, C. M. II. (1980). Social stratification in industrial society: Further evidence for a structural alternative. American Sociological Review, 45, 712–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bielby, W. T. (2000). Minimizing workplace gender and racial bias, Contemporary Sociology, 29, 120–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bielby, W. T. (2005). Applying social research on stereotyping and cognitive bias to employment discrimination litigation: The case of allegations of systematic gender bias at Wal-Mart Stores. In Nelson, R. L. and Neilson, L. B. (eds.), Handbook on Employment Discrimination Research: Rights and Realities. New York: Springer Publishing.Google Scholar
Bielby, W. T., and Baron, J. N. (1986). Men and women at work: Sex segregation and statistical discrimination. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 759–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bielby, W. T., and Bielby, D. D. (1999). Organizational mediation of project-based labor markets: Talent agencies and the careers of screenwriters. American Sociological Review, 64, 64–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bisom-Rapp, S. (1999). Bulletproofing the workplace: Symbol and substance in employment discrimination law practice. Florida State University Law Review, 26, 959–1038.Google Scholar
Blau, P., and Duncan, O. D. (1967). The American Occupational Structure. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Block, F. (1994). Antidiscrimination Law and Minority Employment: Recruitment Practices and Regulatory Constraints. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bower, B. (2006). The bias finders: A test of unconscious attitudes polarizes psychologists. Science News, 169, April 22, 2006, 250–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, M. B., and Brown, R. J. (1998). Intergroup relations. In Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T., and Lindzey, G. (eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology, 2 (4th edn) (pp. 554–594). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brewer, M. B., and Kramer, R. M. (1985). The psychology of intergroup attitudes and behaviors. Annual Review of Psychology, 36, 219–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhler, P. M. (1999). The manager's role in preventing sexual harassment. Supervision, 60 (April 1999), 16–18.Google Scholar
Buhler, P. M. (2002). Streetwise Human Resources Management. Avon: Adams Media.Google Scholar
Cox, T. H., and Nkomo, S. M. (1991). A race and gender-group analysis of the early career experience of MBAs. Work and Occupations, 18, 431–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dasgupta, N. (2004). Implicit ingroup favoritism, outgroup favoritism, and their behavioral manifestations. Social Justice Research, 17, 143–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, K., and Moore, W. E. (1945). Some principles of stratification. American Sociological Review, 10, 242–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devine, P. G., and Elliot, A. J. (1995). Are racial stereotypes really fading? The Princeton trilogy revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1139–1150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dichter, M. S., and Burkhardt, M. S. (2005). Class certification after Wal-Mart: New approaches to challenging rule 23 class certification. Paper presented at the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the American Employment Law Council, Santa Barbara, CA, October 19–22, 2005.
DiPrete, T. A., and Soule, W. T. (1986). The organization of career lines: Equal employment opportunity and status advancement in a federal bureaucracy. American Sociological Review, 51, 295–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobbin, F. R., Sutton, J. R., Meyer, J. W., and Scott, W. R. 1993. Equal employment opportunity law and the construction of internal labor markets. American Journal of Sociology, 99, 396–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doucouliagos, C. (1996). Conformity, replication of design and business niches. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 30, 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dovidio, J. F., Bringham, J. C., Johnson, B. T., and Gaertner, S. L. (1996). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination: Another look. In MacRae, C. N., Stangor, C., and Hewstone, M. (eds.), Stereotypes and Stereotyping (pp. 276–319). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Dovidio, J. F., and Gaertner, S. L. (1993). Stereotypes and evaluative intergroup bias. In Mackie, D. M. and Hamilton, D. L. (eds.), Affect, Cognition, and Stereotyping (pp. 167–193). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dreher, G. F., and Cox, T. H. (1996). Race, gender, and opportunity: A study of compensation attainment and the establishment of mentoring relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 297–308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dukes v Wal-Mart Stores Inc., 222 F.R.D. 189, 191–92 (N.D. Cal. 2004) (Admitting social science expert testimony based on social framework analysis).
Eberhardt, J. L., and Fiske, S. L. (1996). Motivating individuals to change: What is a target to do? In MacRae, C. N., Stangor, C., and Hewstone, M. (eds.), Stereotypes and Stereotyping (pp. 369–415). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Edelman, L. B. (1990). Legal environments and organizational governance: The expansion of due process in the workplace. American Journal of Sociology, 95, 1401–1440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, L. B. (1992). Legal ambiguity and symbolic structures: Organizational mediation of civil rights law. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 1531–1576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, L. B. (2005). Law at work: The endogenous construction of civil rights. In Nelson, R. L. and Neilson, L. B. (eds.), Handbook on Employment Discrimination Research: Rights and Realities (pp. 337–353). New York: Springer Publishing.Google Scholar
Edelman, L. B., and Petterson, S. (1999). Symbols and substance in organizational response to civil rights law. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 17, 107–135.Google Scholar
Edelman, L. B., Erlanger, H. S., and Lande, J. (1993). Employers' handling of discrimination complaints: The transformation of rights in the workplace. Law and Society Review, 27, 497–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, L. B., Fuller, S. R., and Mara-Drita, I. (2001). Diversity rhetoric and the managerialization of the law. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 1589–1641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, L. B., Patterson, S., Chambliss, E., and Erlanger, H. S. (1991). Legal ambiguity and the politics of compliance: Affirmative action officers' dilemma. Law and Policy, 13, 1991, 73–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, L. B., Uggen, C., and Erlanger, H. S. (1999). The endogeneity of legal regulation: Grievance procedures as rational myth. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 406–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, J. R. (2001). Referral hiring and ethnically homogeneous jobs: How prevalent is the connection and for whom?Social Science Research, 30, 401–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, N. E., and Tyler, R. B. (1986). Racial stereotypes: The contents of their cognitive representations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 22–37.Google Scholar
Fairhurst, G. T., Green, S., and Courtright, J. (1995). Inertial forces and the implementation of a socio-technical systems approach: A communication study. Organization Science, 6, 168–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandez, J. P. (1981). Racism and Sexism in Corporate Life: Changing Values in American Business, Lexington: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Fernandez, R. M., and Weinberg, N. (1997). Sifting and sorting: Personal contacts and hiring in a retail bank. American Sociological Review, 62, 883–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., and Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fiske, S. T., Lin, M., and Neuberg, S. L. (1999). The continuum model: Ten years later. In Chaiken, S. and Trope, Y. (eds.), Dual Process Theories in Social Psychology (pp. 231–254). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Ford, T. E., Gambino, F., Lee, H., Mayo, E., and Ferguson, M. A. (2004). The role of accountability in suppressing managers' preinterview bias against African American sales job applicants. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 24, 113–124.Google Scholar
Fountain, C. M. (2005). Finding a job in the internet age. Social Forces, 83, 1235–1262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaertner, S. L., and Dovidio, J. F. (2005). Understanding and addressing contemporary racism: From aversive racism to the common ingroup identity model. Journal of Social Issues, 61, 615–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Nier, J, Hodson, G., and Houlette, M. A. (2005). Aversive racism: Bias without intention. In Nelson, R. L. and Neilson, L. B. (eds.), Handbook on Employment Discrimination Research: Rights and Realities. New York: Springer Publishing.Google Scholar
Gardenswartz, L., and Rowe, A. (1994). Diversity management: Practical application in a health care organization. Frontiers of Health Services Management, 11, 36–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gatewood, R. D., and Field, H. S. (2001). Human Resource Selection, 5th edn. Chicago: Dryden Press.Google Scholar
Giovannini, M. (2004). What gets measured gets done: Achieving results through diversity and inclusion. Journal for Quality and Participation, 27, 21–27.Google Scholar
Gordon, M. M. (1949). Social class in American sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 55, 262–268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gordon, M. M. (1958). Social Class in American Sociology. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Greenhaus, J. H., and Parasuraman, S. (1993). Job performance attributions and career advancement prospects: An examination of gender and race effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55, 273–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenhaus, J. H., Parasuraman, S., and Wormley, W. W. (1990). Effects of race on organizational experiences, job performance evaluations, and career outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 64–86.Google Scholar
Gregg, E. (1992). Sexual harassment: Confronting the issues of the '90s. Office Systems, 9 (February 1992), 33–36.
Gresov, C., Haveman, H. A., and Oliva, T. A. (1993). Organizational design, inertia, and the dynamics of competitive response. Organization Science, 4, 181–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannan, M. T., and Freeman, J. H. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 43, 143–164.Google Scholar
Harris, L. E., and Boddy, J. E. Jr. (2004). Sex discrimination and merit-based compensation: Is your system at risk?Morrison and Foerster Employment Law Commentary, 16 (February 2004), 1–6.Google Scholar
Hart, M. (2005). Subjective decisionmaking and unconscious discrimination. Alabama Law Review, 56, 741–791.Google Scholar
Hart, M. (2004). Will employment discrimination class actions survive?Akron Law Review, 37, 813–843.Google Scholar
Heneman, H. G. III, and Judge, T. A. (2003) Staffing Organizations, 4th edn. Middleton, WI: Mendota House and New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Hewstone, M. (1990). The “ultimate attribution error”? A review of the literature on intergroup causal attribution. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 311–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodson, G., Dovidio, J. F., and Gaertner, S. L. (2002). Processes in racial discrimination: Differential weighting of conflicting information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 460–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodson, R., and Kaufman, R. L. (1982). Economic dualism: A critical review. American Sociological Review, 47, 727–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holzer, H J. (1987a). Hiring procedures in the firm: Their economic determinants and outcomes. In Block, R.et al. (eds.), Human Resources and Firm Performance (pp. 243–272). Madison: Industrial Relations Research Association.Google Scholar
Holzer, H, J. (1987b). Informal job search and black youth unemployment. American Economic Review, 77, 446–452.Google Scholar
Hubbard, E. E. (2003). The Diversity Scorecard: Evaluating the Impact of Diversity on Organizational Performance. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
Hunter, J. E., and Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods of Meta-analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Hyde, A. (2006). Employment discrimination in a high-velocity labor market: How a meritocracy creates disparate labor market outcomes through demands for skills at hiring, hiring through networks, and rewards to entrepreneurship. In Gulati, G. M. and Yelnosky, M. (eds.), Behavioral Science Implications for Employment Discrimination Law: Essays in Memory of David Charny (forthcoming). Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer Academic Press (also available at http://law.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1013&context=rutgersnewarklwps).Google Scholar
Ibarra, H. (1995). Race, opportunity, and diversity of social circles in managerial networks. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 673–703.Google Scholar
Jackson, P. B., Thoits, P. A., and Taylor, H. F. (1995). Composition of the workplace and psychological well-being: The effects of tokenism on America's black elite. Social Forces, 74, 543–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, E. H. (2000). Race-related differences in promotions and support: Underlying effects of human and social capital. Organization Science, 11, 493–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jossem, J. (1991). Investigating sexual harassment complaints. Personnel, 68 (July 1991), 9–10.Google Scholar
Kalev, A, Dobbin, F., and Kelly, E. (2006). Best practices or best guesses? Diversity management and the reduction of inequality. American Sociological Review, 71, 589–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalleberg, A. L. (2000). Nonstandard employment relations: Part-time, temporary and contract work. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 341–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalleberg, A. L., Reskin, B. F., and Hudson, K. (2000). Bad jobs in America: Standard and nonstandard employment relations and job quality in the United States. American Sociological Review, 65, 256–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalleberg, A. L., Wallace, M., and Althauser, R. P. (1981). Economic segmentation, worker power, and income inequality. American Journal of Sociology, 87, 651–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, J. (2005). Trojan horses of race. Harvard Law Review, 118, 1491–1593.Google Scholar
Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Kaplan, S., and Henderson, R. (2005). Inertia and incentives: Bridging organizational economics and organizational theory. Organization Science, 16, 509–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasinitz, P., and Rosenberg, J. (1996). Missing the connection: Social isolation and employment on the Brooklyn waterfront. Social Problems, 43, 180–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, R. L. (1986). The impact of industrial and occupational structure on black–white employment allocation. American Sociological Review, 51, 310–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, D. (2000). Accountability: Establishing Shared Ownership. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Communications.Google Scholar
Kerr, S. (1975). On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B. Academy of Management Journal, 18, 769–783.Google ScholarPubMed
Kirschenman, J., Moss, P., and Tilly, C. (1995). Employer screening methods and racial exclusion: Evidence from new in-depth interviews with employers. Working Paper, Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
Kirschenman, J., and Neckerman, K. M. (1991). We'd love to hire them, but …: The meaning of race for employers. In Jencks, C. and Peterson, P. E. (eds.), The Urban Underclass (pp. 203–232). Washington: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Kobata, M. T. (1995). Minimize risk by investigating complaints promptly. Personnel Journal, 74 (February 1995), 38–39.Google Scholar
Konrad, A. M., and Linnehan, F. (1995). Formalized HRM structures: Coordinating equal employment opportunity or concealing organizational practices?Academy of Management Journal, 38, 787–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraiger, K., and Ford, J. K. (1985). A meta-analysis of race effects in performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 56–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, R. M. (1991). Intergroup relations and organizational dilemmas: The role of categorization processes. Research in Organizational Behavior, 13, 191–228.Google Scholar
Krawiec, J. K. (2003). Cosmetic compliance and the failure of negotiated governance. Washington University Law Quarterly, 81, 487–544.Google Scholar
Krieger, L. H. (1995). The content of our categories: A cognitive bias approach to discrimination and equal employment opportunity. Stanford Law Review, 47, 1161–1232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landau, J. (1995). The relationship of race and gender to managers' ratings of promotion potential. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, 391–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landy, F. J., Shankster, L. J., and Kohler, S. S. (1994). Personnel selection and placement. Annual Review of Psychology, 45, 261–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latham, G. P., and Wexley, K. N. (1994). Increasing Productivity through Performance Appraisal. New York: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
Lee, A. J. (2005). Unconscious bias theory in employment discrimination litigation. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 40, 481–504.Google Scholar
Lehrman, S. (2006). The implicit prejudice. Scientific American, June 2006, 32–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lengnick-Hall, M. L. (1992). Checking out sexual harassment claims. HR Magazine, 37 (March 1992), 77–81.
Leonard, J. S. (1989). Women and affirmative action. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3, 61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, J. S. (1994). Use of enforcement techniques in eliminating glass ceiling barriers. Report prepared for the US Department of Labor, Glass Ceiling Commission, April 1994.
Lie., J. (1997). Sociology of markets. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 341–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, S. M., and Bendix, R. (1959). Social Mobility in Industrial Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
LoPresto, R. (1986). Recruitment sources and techniques. In Famularo, J. J. (ed.), Handbook of Human Resource Administration, 2nd edn (pp. 13–26). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Mackie, D. F., Hamilton, D. L., Susskind, J., and Roselli, F. (1996). Social psychological foundations of stereotype formation. In MacRae, C. N., Stangor, C., and Hewstone, M. (eds.), Stereotypes and Stereotyping (pp. 41–78). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Martin, L. (1991). A Report on the Glass Ceiling Initiative. Washington: US Department of Labor.Google Scholar
Martocchio, J. J., and Whitener, E. M. (1992). Fairness in personnel selection: A meta-analysis and policy implications. Human Relations, 45, 489–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, G. M. (2002). Gender, race, and the shadow structure: A study of informal networks and inequality in a work organization, Gender and Society, 16, 303–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menger, P. (1999). Artistic labor markets and careers. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 541–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messick, D. M., and Mackie, D. (1989). Intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 49–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moss, P., and Tilly, C. (2001). Stories Employers Tell. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Mouw, T. (2002). Are black workers missing the connection? The effect of spatial distance and employee referrals on interfirm racial segregation. Demography, 39, 507–528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, R. L., and Neilson, L. B. (eds.). (2005). Handbook on Employment Discrimination Research: Rights and Realities. New York: Springer PublishingGoogle Scholar
Nelson, T. E., Acker, M., and Manis, M. (1996). Irrepressible stereotypes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 13–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nieva, V. F., and Gutek, B. A. (1980). Sex effects on evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 5, 267–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nixon, R. (1985a). Black Managers in Corporate America: Alienation or Integration?Washington, DC: National Urban League.Google Scholar
Nixon, R. (1985b). Climbing the Corporate Ladder: Some Perceptions among Black Managers. Washington, DC: National Urban League.Google Scholar
Norton, M. I., Vandello, J. A., and Darley, J. M. (2004). Casuistry and social category bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 817–831.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oppenheimer, A. (2004). Investigating workplace harassment and discrimination. Employee Relations Law Journal, 29, 55–67.Google Scholar
Orey, M. (2006). White men can't help it: Courts have been buying the idea that they have innate biases. Business Week, May 15, 2006, 54–56.
Orton, D. J., and Weick, K. E. (1990). Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 15, 203–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, T. M., and Sedikides, C. (1992). Out-group homogeneity effects in natural and minimal groups. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 536–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettigrew, T. F., and Martin, J. (1987). Shaping the organizational context for black American inclusion. Journal of Social Issues, 43, 41–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podolny, J. M., and Baron, J. N. (1997). Resources and relationships: Social networks and mobility in the workplace. American Sociological Review, 62, 673–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Relyea, G. F. (1999). The four cornerstones of a reasonable investigation. Human Resources Professional, 12 (May/June 1999), 12–15.Google Scholar
Reskin, B. F. (2000). The proximate causes of employment discrimination. Contemporary Sociology, 29, 319–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reskin, B. F. (2003). Including mechanisms in our models of ascriptive inequality. American Sociological Review, 68, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roggema, J., and Smith, M. H. (1983). Organizational change in the shipping industry: Issues in the transformation of basic assumptions. Human Relations, 36, 765–790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, P. L., Huffcutt, A. I., and Bobko, P. (2003). Ethnic group differences in measures of job performance: A new meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 694–706.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruef, M. (1997). Assessing organizational fitness on a dynamic landscape: An empirical test of the relative inertia thesis. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 837–853.3.0.CO;2-B>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sackett, P. R., and DuBois, C. L. Z. (1991). Rater-ratee race effects on performance evaluation: Challenging meta analytic conclusions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 873–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salancik, G. R., and Pfeffer, J. (1978). Uncertainty, secrecy, and the choice of similar others. Social Psychology, 41, 246–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheck, J. (2004). Expert witness: Bill Bielby helped launch an industry – suing employers for unconscious bias. The Recorder, October 28, 2004, 1.
Schreiber, C. T., Price, K. F., and Morrison, A. (1993). Workforce diversity and the glass ceiling: Practices, barriers, possibilities. Human Resource Planning, 16, 51–69.Google Scholar
Semyonov, M. (1988). Bi-ethnic labor markets, mono-ethnic labor markets, and socioeconomic inequality. American Sociological Review, 53, 256–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sims, R. R. (2002). Organizational Success through Effective Human Resources Management. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.Google Scholar
Stainback, K., Robinson, C. L., and Tomaskovic-Devey, D. (2005). Race and workplace integration: A politically mediated process?American Behavioral Scientist, 48, 1200–1228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stauffer, J. M., and Buckley, K. R. (2005). The existence and nature of racial bias in supervisory ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 586–591.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stinchcombe, L. (1965). Social structure and organizations. In March, J. G. (ed.), Handbook of Organizations (pp. 142–193). Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Stites, J. (2005). Equal pay for the sexes: High profile lawsuits make the case for investigating gender pay and promotion equity at your organization. HR Magazine, 50 (May 2005).
Stockdale, M. S., and Crosby, F. J. (eds.) (2003). The Psychology and Management of Workplace Diversity. Maiden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sturm, S. (2001). Second generation employment discrimination: A structural approach. Columbia Law Review, 101, 458–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, J. R., Dobbin, F. R., Meyer, J. W., and Scott, W. R. (1994). The legalization of the workplace. American Journal of Sociology, 99, 944–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tetlock, P. E. (1985). Accountability: The neglected social context of judgment and choice. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 297–332.Google Scholar
Tetlock, P. E. (1992). The impact of accountability on judgment and choice: Toward a social contingency model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 331–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tetlock, P. E., and Kim, J. I. (1987). Accountability and judgment processes in a personality prediction task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 700–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, D. A. (1990). The impact of race on managers' experiences of developmental relationships (mentoring and sponsorship): An intra-organizational study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11, 479–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uhlmann, E. L., and Cohen, G. L. (2005). Constructed criteria: Redefining merit to justify discrimination. Psychological Science, 16, 474–480.Google ScholarPubMed
United States Department of Labor (2006). Voluntary guidelines for self-evaluation of compensation practices for compliance with nondiscrimination requirements of executive order 11246 with respect to systematic compensation discrimination. Federal Register, 71 (June 15, 2006).
Warner, W. L., Meeker, M., and Bells, K. (1949). Social Class in America. New York: Science Research Associates.Google Scholar
Wax, A., and Tetlock, P. E. (2005). We're all racists at heart. Wall Street Journal, December 1, 2005, A16.
Williams, J. (2003). The social psychology of stereotyping: Using social science to litigate gender discrimination cases and defang the “clueless” defense. Employee Rights and Employment Policy Journal, 7, 401–458.Google Scholar
Word, C. O., Zanna, M. P., and Cooper, J. (1974). The nonverbal mediation of self-fulfilling prophecies in interracial interaction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yarkin, K. L., Town, J. P., and Wallston, B. S. (1982). Blacks and women must try harder: Stimulus for a person's race and sex attributions of causality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 21–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwerling, C., and Silver, H. (1992). Race and job dismissals in a federal bureaucracy. American Sociological Review, 57, 651–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×