Acevedo, C., Rose, D., and Whittaker, R. (2023). Reading to Learn, Reading the World: How Genre-Based Literacy Pedagogy Is Democratizing Education. Sheffield and Bristol: Equinox.Google Scholar

Achugar, M. (2008). What We Remember: The Construction of Memory in Military Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Achugar, M. (2016). Discursive Processes of Intergenerational Transmission of Recent History. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Achugar, M. (2018). Critical discourse analysis and history. In Flowerdew, J. and Richardson, J. E., eds., The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies. Oxford and New York: Routledge, pp. 298–311.Google Scholar

Achugar, M. (2020). Rethinking social memory through Vygotsky and Halliday: The transmission of contested memories of the recent past in Uruguay. Mind, Culture and Activity, 27(3), 249–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Achugar, M. and Baeza, P. (2021). The affective construction of others’ experience: A cross-cultural comparison of youth’s responses to a film about the Uruguayan dictatorship. Linguistics and Education, 66(100993). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2021.100993CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Achugar, M., Fernández, A., and Morales, N. (2011). (Re)presentando el pasado reciente: La última dictadura uruguaya en los manuales de historia. Discurso and Sociedad, 5(2), 196–229.Google Scholar

Achugar, M. and Schleppegrell, M. (2005). Beyond connectors: The construction of cause in history textbooks. Linguistics and Education, 16(3), 298–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Achugar, M. and Schleppegrell, M. (2016). Reflection literacy and the teaching of history. In Bowcher, W. and Liang, J. Y., eds., Society in Language, Language in Society: Essays in Honour of Ruqaiya Hasan. Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 357–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Achugar, M. and Tardio, T. (2020). Documenting language and content integrated learning: A case study of a genre-based history in films course. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2020.1801571CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adorno, T. W. (1986). What does coming to terms with the past mean? In Hartman, G., ed., Bitburg in Moral and Political Perspective (trans. T. Bahti and G. Hartman). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Alarcos Llorach, E. (2000). Gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar

Anderson, M., Keese, I., & Low, A. (2013). Retroactive 1 NSW Australian Curriculum History Stage 4: The Ancient World to the Modern World. Milton: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Bahktin, M. M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination (trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist). Austin and London: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Barton, K. C. and Levstik, L. S. (2004). Teaching History for the Common Good. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartlett, T. A. M. (2012). Hybrid Voices and Collaborative Change: Contextualising Positive Discourse Analysis. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartlett, T. A. M. (2018). Positive discourse analysis. In Flowerdew, J. and Richardson, J. E., eds., The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies. Oxford and New York: Routledge, pp. 133–148.Google Scholar

Barletta, N., Chamorro, D., Ávila, D., Mizuno, J., Moss, G., and Tapia, C. (2015). El texto escolar y el aprendizaje: Enredos y desenredos 2ed. Barranquilla: Editorial Universidad del Norte.Google Scholar

Bartelds, H., Savenije, G., and van Boxtel, C. (2020). Students’ and teachers’ beliefs about historical empathy in secondary history education. Theory and Research in Social Education, 48(4), 529–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benjamin, W. (1968). Illuminations. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar

Bernstein, B. (1971). On the classification and framing of educational knowledge. In Yound, M. F. D, ed., Knowledge and Control: New Directions for the Sociology of Education. London: Collier-Macmillan, pp. 47–69.Google Scholar

Bernstein, B. (1996). Class, Codes and Control, vol. IV: The Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bernstein, B. (1999). Vertical and horizontal discourse: An essay. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(2), 157–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, Symbolic Control, and Identity: Theory, Research, Critique (rev. edn). Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Board of Studies NSW (2012). History K-10 Syllabus: NSW Syllabus for the Australian curriculum. Sydney: Board of Studies NSW.Google Scholar

Boccara, G. (Ed.) (2002). Colonización, resistencia y mestizaje en las Américas (siglos XVI–XX). Quito: Ediciones Abya-Yala.Google Scholar

Boccara, G. and Bolados, P. (2010). ¿Qué es el multiculturalismo? La nueva cuestión étnica en el Chile neoliberal. Revista de Indias, 70(250), 651–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bose, M. (2023). If you want to make cricket truly diverse, don’t fixate on bat and ball – focus on what happens in the tea break. The Guardian, 30 June 2023. www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/jun/30/cricket-bat-ball-game-exclusionGoogle Scholar

Caffarel, A., Martin, J. R., and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). Language Typology: A Functional Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carr, G. (2023). Knowledge and values in sex education: A close analysis of classroom practice. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Department of Linguistics, University of Sydney.Google Scholar

Carretero, M and Castorina, J. A. (2012). La construcción de conocimiento histórico. Buenos Aires: Paidós.Google Scholar

Carretero, M. and Borrelli, M. (2008). Memorias recientes y pasados en conflict: ¿Cómo enseñar historia reciente en la escuela? Cultura y Educación, 20(2), 201–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carnovale, V. and Larramendy, A. (2010). Enseñar la historia reciente en la escuela: Problemas y aportes para su abordaje. In Siede, I., coord., Ciencias sociales en la escuela: Criterios y propuestas para la enseñanza. Buenos Aires: Aique, pp. 238–265.Google Scholar

Castro, C. and Oteíza, T. (2022). Historical explanations in the Rettig Report: The role of interpersonal grammatical metaphors. Discourse and Society, 33(5), 581–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chen, H. (2014). Last chapter unfinished: The making of the official Qing History and the crisis of traditional Chinese historiography. Historiography East and West, 2(2), 173–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chiang, T. (1998). Story of your life. In Stories of Your Life and Others. New York: Tor Books, pp. 74–116.Google Scholar

Christie, F. (2002). Classroom Discourse: A Functional Perspective. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Christie, F. and Derewianka, B. (2008). School Discourse: Learning to Write across the Years of Schooling. New York: Continuum Discourse.Google Scholar

Christie, F. and Martin, J. R. (1997). Genre and Institutions: Social Processes in the Workplace and School. London: Cassell.Google Scholar

Christie, F. and Martin, J. R. (2007). Language, Knowledge and Pedagogy: Functional Linguistic and Sociological Perspectives. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Christie, F. and Maton, K. (2011). Disciplinarity: Functional Linguistics and Sociological Perspectives. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Clark, E. (2015). Common ground. In MacWhinney, B. and O’Grady, W., eds., The Handbook of Language Emergence. New York: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 328–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, H. H. (2006). Context and common ground. In K. Brown, , ed., Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. New York: Elsevier, pp. 105–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coffin, C. (1996). Exploring Literacy in School History. Sydney: Metropolitan East Region’s Disadvantaged Schools Program.Google Scholar

Coffin, C. (1997). Constructing and giving value to the past: An investigation into secondary school history. In Christie, F. and Martin, J. R., eds., Genre and Institutions: Social Processes in the Workplace and School. London: Continuum, pp. 196–230.Google Scholar

Coffin, C. (2000). History as discourse: Construals of time, cause and appraisal. Unpublished PhD thesis, School of English and Linguistics, University of New South Wales, Australia.Google Scholar

Coffin, C. (2003). Reconstruing the past: Settlement or invasion? In Martin, J. R. and Wodak, R., eds., Re/reading the Past: Critical and Functional Perspectives on Time and Value. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 219–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coffin, C. (2004). Learning to write history: The role of causality. Written Communication, 21(3), 261–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coffin, C. (2006). Historical Discourse: The Language of Time, Cause and Evaluation, London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

Constantine, L. N. (1933). Cricket and I. London: Philip Allan.Google Scholar

Davies, I. (2017). Introduction. In Davies, I., ed., Debates in History Teaching, 2nd edn. Oxford and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Dennett, B. and Dixon, S. (2013). Oxford Insight History: Australian Curriculum for NSW Stage 4. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Deroey, K. L. B. and Taverniers, M. (2012). Just remember this: Lexicogrammatical relevance markers in lectures. English for Specific Purposes, 31(4), 221–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doran, Y. J. (2017). The Discourse of Physics: Building Knowledge through Language, Mathematics and Images, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doran, Y. J. (2020a). Seeing values: Axiology and affording attitude in Australia’s ‘invasion’. In Martin, J. R., Maton, K., and Doran, Y. J., eds., Accessing Academic Discourse: Systemic Functional Linguistics and Legitimation Code Theory. London: Routledge, pp. 151–176.Google Scholar

Doran, Y. J. (2020b). Cultivating values: Knower-building in the humanities. Estudios de lingüística aplicada, 37(70), 169–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doran, Y. J. and Martin, J. R. (2021). Field relations: Understanding scientific explanations. In Maton, K., Martin, J. R., and Doran, Y. J., eds., Teaching Science: Knowledge, Language, Pedagogy. London: Routledge, pp. 105–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doran, Y. J., Martin, J. R. and Zappavigna, M. (2024). Negotiating Social Relations: Tenor Resources in English. London: Equinox.Google Scholar

Downey, M. T. and Long, K. A. (2016). Teaching for Historical Literacy: Building Knowledge in the History Classroom. New York and Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar

Dussel, E. (1999). ‘Sensibility’ and ‘Otherness’ in Emmanuel Lévinas. Philosophy Today, 43(2), 126–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eggins, S., Wignell, P., and Martin, J. R. (1993). The discourse of history: Distancing the recoverable past. In Ghadessy, M., ed., Register Analysis. London: Pinter, pp. 75–109.Google Scholar

Fang, J. (2022). A Systemic Functional Grammar of Chinese Nominal Groups: A Text-Based Approach. Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fernández, C. and Giadrosic, G. (2018). Historia, geografía y ciencias sociales: Quinto Básico. Santiago de Chile: Editorial SM, Ministerio de Educación de Chile.Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, J. (2019). Teaching the reasons why: An analysis of causation in history textbooks and historical primary source documents. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(4), 1027–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flowerdew, J. (2003). Signalling nouns in discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 22, 329–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flowerdew, J. and Forest, R. W. (2015). Signalling Nouns in English: A Corpus-Based Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giudice, J. and Moyano, E. I. (2013). El período 76-83 en la Argentina: Género, ideología y formación de ciudadanos en manuales de Ciencias Sociales. In E. I. Moyano, , coord., Aprender ciencias y humanidades: Una cuestión de lectura y escritura. Los Polvorines: Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento, pp. 399–426.Google Scholar

Grice, P. (1989). Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Grimshaw, A. (1992). C. L. R. James: A revolutionary vision for the twentieth century. In Grimshaw, , ed., The C. L. R. James Reader. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1975). Learning How to Mean: Explorations in the Development of Language. London: Edward Arnold.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1984a). Language as code and language as behaviour: A systemic-functional interpretation of the nature and ontogenesis of dialogue. In Fawcett, R. P., Halliday, M. A. K., Lamb, S. M., and Makkai, A., eds., The Semiotics of Culture and Language, vol. I: Language as Social Semiotic. London: Frances Pinter, pp. 3–35.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1984b). Grammatical metaphor in English and Chinese. In Hong, B., ed., New Papers on Chinese Language Use. Canberra: Contemporary China Centre Australian National University, pp. 9–18.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1993). On the language of Physical science. In M. A. K. Halliday, J. R. Martin, , Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. London: The Falmer Press, pp. 54–68.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1998). Things and relations. In Martin, J. R. and Veel, R., eds., Reading Science: Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourses of Science. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 185–235.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (2003). Systemic grammar and the concept of a ‘science of language’. In Webster, J., ed., On Language and Linguistics, vol. III. London: Equinox, pp. 199–212. (Original work published in 1992.)Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. and Greaves, W. S. (2008). Intonation in the Grammar of English. London: Equinox.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. and Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. London: Falmer.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Pearson Education.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M.. (1999). Construing Experience through Meaning: A Language-Based Approach to Cognition. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. and McDonald, E. (2004). Metafunctional profile of the grammar of Chinese. In Caffarel, A., Martin, J. R., and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., eds., Language typology: A Functional Perspective. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 305–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hao, J. (2015). Construing biology: An ideational perspective. Doctoral thesis, University of Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar

Hao, J. (2018). Reconsidering ‘cause inside the clause’ in scientific discourse: From a discourse semantic perspective in systemic functional linguistics. Text and Talk, 38(5), 525–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hao, J. (2020a). Analysing Scientific Discourse: A Framework for Exploring Knowledge Building in Biology from a Systemic Functional Linguistic Perspective. New York and London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hao, J. (2020b). Construing relations between scientific activities through Mandarin Chinese. In Martin, J. R., Doran, Y. J., and Figueredo, G., eds., Systemic Functional Language Description: Making Meaning Matter. New York: Routledge, pp. 238–272.Google Scholar

Hao, J. (2020c). Nominalisations in scientific English: A tristratal perspective. Functions of Language, 27(2), 143–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hao, J. (2022). Analysing knowledge building through language: A case in Mandarin Chinese. In Caldwell, D., Martin, J. R., and Knox, J., eds., Applied Linguistics and Social Semiotics: Developing Theory from Practice. London, New York, and Dublin: Bloomsbury, pp. 405–419.Google Scholar

Hao, J. and Hood, S. (2019). Valuing science: The role of language and body language in a health science lecture. Journal of Pragmatics, 139(2019), 200–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hao, J. and Wang, P. (2022). Chinese nominal groups: The metaphorical realization of figures. WORD, 68(2), 109–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hood, S. (2019). Appraisal. In Thompson, G., Bowcher, W., Fontaine, L., and Schönthal, D., eds., The Cambridge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 382–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hood, S. (2010). Appraising Research: Evaluation in Academic Writing. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hood, S. and Hao, J. (2021). Grounded learning: Telling and showing in the language and paralanguage of a science lecture. In Maton, K., Martin, J. R., and Doran, Y. J., eds., Teaching Science: Knowledge, Language, Pedagogy. London: Routledge, pp. 226–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hood, S. and Maggiora, P. (2016). A lecturer at work: Language, the body and space in the structuring of disciplinary knowledge in law. In de Silva Joyce, H., ed., Language at Work in Social Contexts: Analysing Language Use in Work, Educational, Medical and Museum Contexts. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars, pp. 108–128.Google Scholar

Hood, S. and Martin, J. R. (2007). Invoking attitude: The play of graduation in appraising discourse. In Hasan, R., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., and Webster, J. J., eds., Continuing Discourse on Language: A Functional Perspective, vol. II. London: Equinox, pp. 739–764.Google Scholar

Hood, S. and Zhang, D. (2020). Graduation in play with other systems of meaning in the enactment of interpersonal relations. Journal of Foreign Languages, 43(6), 21–41.Google Scholar

Humphrey, S. (2017). Academic Literacies in the Middle Years. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Icaza, C., Mayorca, R., and Santelices, C. (2020). Historia, geografía y ciencias sociales: Priemro medio. Santiago de Chile: Santillana y Ministerio de Educación de Chile.Google Scholar

Iedema, R., Feez, S., and White, P. (1994). Media Literacy (Write It Right Literacy in Industry Project: Stage Two). Sydney: Metropolitan East Region’s Disadvantaged Schools Program.Google Scholar

James, C. L. R. (1932). The Life of Captain Cipriani: An Account of British Government in the West Indies. 2014 edition including The Case for West-Indian Self Government, 1933. London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

James, C. L. R. (1936). Minty Alley, London: Secker and Warburg.Google Scholar

James, C. L. R. (1937). World Revolution, 1917–1936, 2017 edn. London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

James, C. L. R. (1938). The Black Jacobins: Toussaint L’Ouverture and the San Domingo Revolution. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

James, C. L. R. (1963). Beyond a Boundary, 2005 edn. London: Yellow Jersey Press.Google Scholar

James, C. L. R. (1969). A History of Pan-African Revolt, 2nd edn of 1938. A History of Negro Revolt, 2012 edn. Oakland: PM Press.Google Scholar

James, C. L. R. (1986). Cricket, ed. Grimshaw, Anna. London: Allison and Busby.Google Scholar

Jian, B. (2006). The Essential History of China. Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar

Jimeno, M. (2010). Emociones y política: La víctima y la construcción de comunidades emocionales. Maná: Estudios de Antropología Social, No. 16, 99–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jin, B. (1987). ‘Shaoshu minzu’ yi ci zai wo guo heshi chuxian. Zhongguo Minzu, 6, 47.Google Scholar

Knight, N. (2010a). Laughing our bonds off: Conversational humour in relation to affiliation. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Sydney.Google Scholar

Knight, N. (2010b). Wrinkling complexity: Concepts of identity and affiliation in humour. In Bednarek, M. and Martin, J. R., eds., New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity and Affiliation. London and New York: Continuum, pp. 35–58.Google Scholar

Knight, N. K. (2013). Evaluating experience in funny ways: How friends bond through conversational hum. Text and Talk, 33, 553–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. (2021). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

LaCapra, D. (2001) Writing History, Writing Trauma. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lassen, I. (1997). On the cohabitation of grammatical metaphor and conventional figures of speech. In Lassen, I., ed., Interactional Perspectives on LSP. Aalborg: Centre for Languages and Intercultural Studies, pp. 67–84.Google Scholar

Lassen, I. (2003). Accessibility and Acceptability in Technical Manuals: A Survey of Style and Grammatical Metaphor, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leinhardt, G. (1994). History: A time to be mindful. In Leinhardt, G., Beck, I., and Stainton, C., eds., Teaching and Learning in History. New York: Routledge, pp. 209–255.Google Scholar

Leinhardt, G. and Young, K. M. (1996). Two texts, three readers: Distance and expertise in reading history. Cognition and Instruction, 14(4), 441–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leiva, N. (2022). Conexiones causales en español: Un recurso semántico-discursivo para explicar el pasado reciente en la Historia escolar. Estudios filológicos, 69, 135–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lemke, J. (1995). Textual Politics: Discourse and Social Dynamics. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar

Lemke, J. (2015). Feeling and meaning: A unitary bio-semiotic account. In Trifonas, P. P., ed., International Handbook of Semiotics. New York: Springer, pp. 589–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levinas, E. (2007). Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press. (Originally published in 1969.)Google Scholar

Li, E. S-H (2007). A Systemic Functional Grammar of Chinese: A Text-Based Analysis. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Logi, L., Zappavigna, M., (2022). Affiliation: An appliable framework for exploring community and identity in discourse. In Martin, J. R., Knox, J., and Caldwell, D., eds., Appliable Linguistics and Social Semiotics: Developing Theory from Practice. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 487–506.Google Scholar

Macken-Horarik, M., Sandiford, C., Love, K., and Unsworth, L. (2015). New ways of working ‘with grammar in mind’ in School English: Insights from systemic functional grammatics. Linguistics and Education, 31, 145–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Macnaught, L., Maton, K., Martin, J. R., and Matruglio, E. (2013). Jointly constructing semantic waves: Implications for teacher training. Linguistics and Education, 24(1), 50–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Macnaught, L., Matruglio, E., and Doran, Y. J. (2022). Using historical evidence: Semantic profiles and demonstrating understanding of Ancient History in senior secondary school. Historical Encounters, 10(1), 76–99. https://doi.org/10.52289/hej10.106.Google Scholar

Martin, J. R. (1989). Technicality and abstraction: Language for the creation of specialised texts. In Christie, F., ed., Writing in Schools: Reader. Geelong, Vic.: Deakin University Press, pp. 36–44.Google Scholar

Martin, J. R. (1991). Nominalization in science and humanities: Distilling knowledge and scaffolding text. In Ventola, E., ed., Functional and Systemic Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 307–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, J. R. (1992). English Text: System and Structure, Philadelphia and Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, J. R. (1993). Life as a noun: Arresting the universe in science and humanities. In Halliday, M. A. K. and Martin, J. R., eds., Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. London: The Falmer Press, pp. 242–293.Google Scholar

Martin, J. R. (1999). Mentoring semogenesis: ‘Genre-based’ literacy pedagogy. In Christie, F., ed., Pedagogy and the Shaping of Consciousness: Linguistic and Social Processes. London: Cassell, pp. 123–155.Google Scholar

Martin, J. R. (1994). Macrogenres: The ecology of the page. Network, 21, 21–52.Google Scholar

Martin, J. R. (2002a). Writing history: Construing time and value in discourses of the past. In Schleppegrell, M. J. and Colombi, M. C., eds., Developing Advanced Literacy in First and Second Languages: Meaning with Power. Mahwah, NJ and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 87–118.Google Scholar

Martin, J. R. (2002b). Blessed are the peacemakers: Reconciliation and evaluation. In Candlin, C.. ed., Research and Practice in Professional Discourse. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press, pp. 187–227.Google Scholar

Martin, J. R. (2003a). Voicing the ‘other’: Reading and writing Indigenous Australians. In Weiss, G. and Wodak, R., eds., Critical Discourse Analysis: Theory and Interdisciplinarity. London: Palgrave, pp. 199–219.Google Scholar

Martin, J. R. (2003b). Making history: Grammar for explanation. In Martin, J. R. and Wodak, R., eds., Re/reading the Past: Critical and Functional Perspectives on Time and Value. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 19–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, J. R. (2004). Positive discourse analysis: Solidarity and change. Revista Canaria de estudios ingleses, 49, 179–200.Google Scholar

Martin, J. R. (2007). Construing knowledge: a functional linguistic perspective. In Christie, F. and Martin, J. R., eds., Language, Knowledge and Pedagogy: Functional Linguistics and Sociological Perspective. London: Continuum, pp. 34–64.Google Scholar

Martin, J. R. (2008). Incongruent and proud: De/vilifying ‘nominalisation’. Discourse and Society, 19(6), 801–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, J. R. (2009). Realisation, instantiation and individuation: Some thoughts on identity in Youth Justice Conferencing. DELTA – Documentação de Estudos em Linguistica Teorica e Aplicada, 25, 549–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, J. R. (2010a). Semantic variation: Modelling realisation, instantiation and individuation in social semiosis. In Bednarek, M. and Martin, J. R., eds., New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity and Affiliation. London and New York: Continuum, pp. 1–34.Google Scholar

Martin, J. R. (2010b). Language, register and genre. In Coffin, C., Lillis, T., and O’Halloran, K., eds., Applied Linguistics Methods: A Reader. London: Routledge, pp. 12–32.Google Scholar

Martin, J. R. (2011). Bridging troubled waters: Interdisciplinarity and what makes it stick. Christie, F. and Maton, K., eds., Disciplinarity: Functional Linguistic and Sociological Perspectives. London: Continuum, pp. 35–61.Google Scholar

Martin, J. R. (2013). Embedded literacy: Knowledge as meaning. Linguistics and Education, 24(1), 23–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, J. R. (2015). Meaning beyond the clause: Co-textual relations. Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 11(2–3), 203–235.Google Scholar

Martin, J. R. (2016). Exploring content: Building knowledge in school discourse. In Lai, L., Mahboob, A., and Wang, P., eds., Multiperspective Studies of Language: Theory and Application – Selected Proceedings of the 8th International Free Linguistics Conference. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.Google Scholar

Martin, J. R. (2017). The discourse semantics of attitudinal relations: Continuing the study of lexis. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 21(1), 22–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, J. R. (2019). Discourse semantics. In Thompson, G., Bowcher, W., Fontaine, L., and Schönthal, D., eds., The Cambridge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 358–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, J. R. (2020a). Metaphors we feel by: Stratal tension. Journal of World Languages 6(1–2) (New Directions of Systemic Functional Linguistics ed. Y. Gao and J. Webster), 8–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, J. R. (2020b). Ideational semiosis: Field, discourse semantics, lexicogrammar. DELTA – Documentação de Estudos em Linguistica Teorica e Aplicada, 26(2) (Special issue in honour of Leila Barbara ed. T. B. Sardinha), 1–27.Google Scholar

Martin, J. R. (2020c). Revisiting field: Specialized knowledge in secondary school science and humanities discourse. In Martin, J. R., Maton, K., and Doran, Y. J., eds., Accessing Academic Discourse: Systemic Functional Linguistics and Legitimation Code Theory. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 114–147.Google Scholar

Martin, J. R. (2020d). The effability of semantic relations: Describing attitude. Journal of Foreign Languages, 43(6), 2–20.Google Scholar

Martin, J. R. (2021). Pedagogic discourse: Marshalling register variation. Revista Signos 54(107) (Special issue in Honour of Giovanni Parodi), 771–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, J. R., Maton, K., and Doran, Y. J. (2020a). Accessing Academic Discourse: Systemic Functional Linguistics and Legitimation Code Theory. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Martin, J. R., Maton, K., and Doran, Y. J. (2020b). Academic discourse: An inter-disciplinary dialogue. Martin, J. R., Maton, K., and Doran, Y. J., eds., Accessing Academic Discourse: Systemic Functional Linguistics and Legitimation Code Theory. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 1–31.Google Scholar

Martin, J. R., Maton, K., and Matruglio, E. (2010). Historical cosmologies: Epistemology and axiology in Australian secondary school history discourse. Revista Signos, 43(74), 433–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, J. R. and Matruglio, E. (2013). Revisiting mode: Context in/dependency in Ancient History classroom discourse. In Guowen, H., Zhu, Y., Delu, Z., and Xinzhang, Y., eds., Studies in Functional Linguistics and Discourse Analysis. Beijing: Higher Education Press, pp. 72–95.Google Scholar

Martin, J. R., Quiroz, B., and Wang, P. (2023). Systemic Functional Grammar: A Text-Based Description of English, Spanish and Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, J. R. and Rose, D. (2007). Working with Discourse: Meaning beyond the Clause, 2nd edn. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Martin, J. R. and Rose, D. (2008). Genre Relations: Mapping Culture. London and Oakville: Equinox.Google Scholar

Martin, J. R. and Stenglin, M. (2007). Materialising reconciliation: Negotiating difference in a post-colonial exhibition. In Royce, T. and Bowcher, W., eds., New Directions in the Analysis of Multimodal Discourse. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 215–238.Google Scholar

Martin, J. R. and White, P. R. R. (2005). The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, J. R., Wignell, P., Eggins, S., and Rothery, J. (1988). Secret English: Discourse technology in a junior secondary school. In Gerot, L., Oldenberg, J., and Van Leeuwen, T., eds., Language and Socialisation: Home and School. Sydney: School of English and Linguistics, Macquarie University (Report of the 1986 Working Conference on Language in Education), pp. 143–173.Google Scholar

Martin, J. R. and Wodak, R. (2003). Re/reading the Past: Critical and Functional Perspectives on Time and Value. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, J. R. and Zappavigna, M. (2016). Exploring restorative justice: Dialectics of theory and practice. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 23(2), 217–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maton, K. (2014). Knowledge and Knowers: Towards a Realist Sociology of Education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Maton, K. (2018). Taking autonomy tours: A key to integrative knowledge-building. LCT Centre Occasional Paper 1, 1–35.Google Scholar

Maton, K., Martin, J. R., and Doran, Y. J. (2021). Teaching Science: Language, Knowledge and Pedagogy. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matruglio, E. (2018). Neutral subjectivity: Facts and evidence in school modern history writing. Linguistics and Education, 48, 76–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matruglio, E., Maton, K., and Martin, J. R. (2013). Time travel: The role of temporality in enabling semantic waves in secondary school teaching. Linguistics and Education, 24(1), 38–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mederos, H. (1988). Procedimientos de cohesión en el español actual. Tenerife: Cabildo Insular de Tenerife.Google Scholar

Ministerio de Educación, Chile, MINEDUC (2012). Bases curriculares: Primero a sexto básico. Santiago: Unidad de Currículum y Evaluación Ministerio de Educación.Google Scholar

Ministerio de Educación, Chile, MINEDUC (2015). Programa de estudio: Historia, geografía y ciencias sociales. Tercer año medio. Santiago: Unidad de Currículum y Evaluación Ministerio de Educación.Google Scholar

Montolío, E. (2015). Conectores de la lengua escrita, 2nd edn. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar

Moss, G. (2010). Textbook language, ideology and citizenship: The case of a history textbook in Colombia, Functions of Language, 17(1), 71–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moss, G., Barletta, N., Chamorro, D., and Mizuno, J. (2013). La metáfora gramatical en los textos escolares de ciencias sociales en español. Onomazein, 28, 88–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Munslow, A. (2006). Deconstructing history, 2nd edn. London and New York: RoutledgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moyano, E. I. (2010). Escritura académica a lo largo de la carrera: Un programa institucional. Revista Signos, 43(74), 465–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moyano, E. I. (2013). Proyección congruente y metafórica en las discusiones de artículos científicos de tres disciplinas en español. In Orlando Vian Jr. and Cida Caltabiano, eds., Língua (gem) e suas múltiplas faces. Campinas: Mercado de Letras, pp. 109–133.Google Scholar

Moyano, E. I. and Giudice, J. (2016a). Negotiation between professional peers: Critical strategy for a reading and writing program at the university level. Ilha Desterro, 69(3), 157–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moyano, E. I. and Giudice, J. (2016b). Un programa de lectura y escritura universitario: Lineamientos teóricos, características y resultados de aplicación. GRAFÍA: Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Humanas de la Universidad Autónoma de Colombia, 13(1), 33–59Google Scholar

Müller, V. (2019). Metáfora gramatical ideacional: Un recurso clave para la alfabetización avanzada y académica. Signos, 52(99), 109–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Myskow, G. (2016). Appraisal in history: Construals of significance, fortune and status. Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 12(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Myskow, G. (2017). Surveying the historical landscape: The evaluative voice of history textbooks. Functional Linguistics, 4(7), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Myskow, G. (2018a). Changes in attitude: Evaluative language in secondary school and university history textbooks. Linguistics and Education, 43, 53–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Myskow, G. (2018b). A framework for analyzing evaluative language in historical discourse. Functions of Language, 25(3), 335–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nokes, J. R. (2022). Building Students’ Historical Literacies: Learning to Read and Reason with Historical Texts and Evidence, 2nd edn. New York and Oxford: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olson, O. L. (2001). In pursuit of historical empathy. In Davis, O. L., Yeager, E. A., and Foster, S. J., eds., Historical Empathy and Perspective Taking in Social Studies. Boston: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar

Oteíza, T. (2003). How contemporary history is presented in Chilean middle school textbooks. Discourse and Society, 14(5), 639–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oteíza, T. (2006). El discurso pedagógico de la historia: Un análisis lingüístico sobre la construcción ideológica de la historia de Chile (1970–2001), Santiago de Chile: Frasis.Google Scholar

Oteíza, T. (2009). Evaluative patterns in the official discourse of human rights in Chile: Giving value to the past and building historical memories in society. DELTA – Documentação de Estudos em Linguistica Teorica e Aplicada, 25, 609–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oteíza, T. (2013). Recontextualización del pasado nacional reciente en los manuales escolares de Historia. In Moyano, E. I., ed., Aprender ciencias y humanidades: Una cuestión de lectura y escritura. Aportes para la construcción de un programa de inclusión social a través de la educación lingüística. Los Polvorines: UNGS, pp. 357–398.Google Scholar

Oteíza, T. (2017a). Escritura en la historia: Potencial de los recursos lingüísticos interpersonales e ideacionales para la construcción de la evidencia. Lenguas modernas, 50, 193–224.Google Scholar

Oteíza, T. (2017b). Appraisal framework and discourse analysis. In Bartlett, T. and O’Grady, G., eds., The Routledge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 457–472.Google Scholar

Oteíza, T. (2018). Prácticas de la memoria en clases de historia: construcción de la evidencia multimodal e intertextual del pasado reciente chileno. Discurso and Sociedad, 12(1), 112–160.Google Scholar

Oteíza, T. (2020a). Historical events and processes in the discourse of disciplinary history and classroom interaction. In Martin, J. R., Maton, K., and Doran, Y. J., eds., Accessing Academic Discourse: Systemic Functional Linguistics and Legitimation Code Theory. London: Routledge, pp. 177–207.Google Scholar

Oteíza, T. (2020b). Language resources to negotiate official and alternative memories of human rights violations in Chilean history: A study on classroom interactions. Historical Encounters: A Journal of Historical Consciousness, Historical Cultures, and History Education, 7(2), 26–49.Google Scholar

Oteíza, T. (2021a). Mapuche people: Valuing a colonial past in the official primary History textbook from an intermodal perspective of historical sources. Journal of Foreign Languages, 44(1), 42–64.Google Scholar

Oteíza, T. (2021b). El sistema de compromiso en español escrito: Dialogicidad en el campo del discurso de la historia. Boletín de Filología, 3(2), 799–819.Google Scholar

Oteíza, T. (2023). What to Remember, What to Teach: Human Rights Violations in Chile’s Recent Past and the Pedagogical Discourse of History. London: Equinox.Google Scholar

Oteíza, T. and Achugar, M. (2018), History textbooks and the construction of dictatorship. In Fuchs, E. and Bock, A., eds., The Palgrave Handbook of Textbook Studies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 304–316.Google Scholar

Oteíza, T. and Castro, C. (2020). Dictatorship and the Cold War in official Chilean history textbooks. In Christophe, B., Gautschi, P., and Thorp, R., eds., The Cold War in the Classroom. Palgrave Studies in Educational Media, pp. 221–247.Google Scholar

Oteíza, T., Henríquez, R., and Pinuer, C. (2015). History class interactions and the transmission of recent Chilean memory of human rights violations. Journal of Educational Media, Memory, and Society, 7(2), 44–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oteíza, T., Henríquez, R., and Canelo, V (2018). Language resources to negotiate historical thinking in history classroom interactions. Linguistics and Education, 47, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oteíza, T. and Pinto, D. (2008). Agency, responsibility and silence in the construction of contemporary history in Chile and Spain. Discourse and Society, 19(3), 333–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oteíza, T. and Pinuer, C. (2012). Prosodia Valorativa: Construcción de eventos y procesos en el discurso de la historia. Discurso y Sociedad, 6(2), 418–446.Google Scholar

Oteíza, T. and Pinuer, C. (2016). Appraisal framework and critical discourse studies: A joint approach to the study of historical memories from an intermodal perspective. International Journal of Language Studies, 10(2), 5–32.Google Scholar

Oteíza, T. and Pinuer, C. (2019). El sistema de valoración como herramienta teórico- metodológica para el estudio social e ideológico del discurso. Logos: Revista de Lingüística, Filosofía y Literatura, 29(2), 207–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pascual, M. (2017). La violación a los derechos humanos en la Argentina: Dinámica evaluativa de dos décadas de representación en medios. Discurso and Sociedad, 11(3), 388–413.Google Scholar

Pinuer, C., Oteíza, T., and Delgado, C. (2019). La metáfora gramatical en la construcción de posicionamientos discursivos. Estudios filológicos, 64, 223–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pinuer, C., Oteíza, T., and Molina, C. (2020). La nominalización en la representación léxico-gramatical y discursiva en manuales escolares chilenos de historia y ciencias sociales, Onomázein, 50,162–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pons Bordería, S. (1998). Conexión y conectores: Estudio de su relación en el registro informal de la lengua, Valencia: Publicacions de la Universitat de ValènciaGoogle Scholar

Poynton, C. (1990). Address and the semiotics of social relations: A Systemic-Functional account of address forms and practices in Australian English. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Sydney.Google Scholar

Poynton, C. (1993). Grammar, language and the social: Post-structuralism and Systemic Functional Linguistics. Social Semiotics, 3(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perfetti, C. A., Britt, M. A., and Georgi, M. C. (1995). Text-Based Learning and Reasoning: Studies in History, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Posetti, J. and Shabbir, N. (2022). The Chilling: What More Can News Organizations Do to Combat Gendered Online Violence? UNESCO (open access).Google Scholar

Quintana, S., Castillo, S., Pérez, N., Moyano, C., and Thielemann, L. (2018). Historia, geografía y ciencias sociales, tercero medio. Santiago di Chile: Editorial SM.Google Scholar

Quiroz, B. (2013). The interpersonal and experiential grammar of Chilean Spanish: towards a principled systemic-functional description based on axial argumentation. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Sydney.Google Scholar

Quiroz, B. (2015). La cláusula como movimiento interactivo: Una perspectiva semántico-discursiva de la gramática interpersonal del español. DELTA – Documentação de Estudos em Linguistica Teorica e Aplicada, 31(1), 261–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quiroz, B. (2018). Negotiating interpersonal meanings: Reasoning about mood. Functions of Language, 25(1), 135–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quiroz, B. (2021). Interpersonal grammar in Spanish. In Martin, J. R., Quiroz, B., and Figueredo, G., eds., Interpersonal Grammar: Systemic Functional Linguistic Theory and Description. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 34–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quiroz, B. and Martin, J. R. (2021). Perfil sistémico-funcional del grupo nominal en español: Estructura, funciones discursivas básicas y organización sistémica. Estudios filológicos, 68, 123–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Real Academia Española. (2014). Diccionario de la lengua española, Madrid: EspasaGoogle Scholar

Rodríguez, M. (Director). (2016). Migas de pan [Film]. Co-production: Uruguay-España: Xamalú Filmes, RCI productions.Google Scholar

Rose, D. (2018). Pedagogic register analysis: Mapping choices in teaching and learning. Functional Linguistics, 5(3), 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rose, D. (2020). Building a pedagogic metalanguage I: Curriculum genres. In Martin, J. R., Maton, K., and Doran, Y. J., eds., Accessing Academic Discourse: Systemic Functional Linguistics and Legitimation Code Theory. London: Routledge, pp. 236–267.Google Scholar

Rose, D. (2022). Designing pedagogic registers: Reading to Learn. In Caldwell, D., Knox, J., and Martin, J. R., eds., Appliable Linguistics and Social Semiotics: Developing Theory from Practice. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 103–125.Google Scholar

Rose, D. and Martin, J. R. (2012). Learning to Write, Reading to Learn: Genre, Knowledge and Pedagogy in the Sydney School. London: Equinox.Google Scholar

Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schleppegrell, M. J. (2004). The Language of Schooling: A Functional Linguistics Perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schleppegrell, M. J. (2011). Supporting disciplinary learning through language analysis: Developing historical literacy. In Christie, F. and Maton, K., eds., Disciplinarity: Functional Linguistic and Sociological Perspectives London: Continuum, pp. 197–216.Google Scholar

Schleppegrell, M. J. and Achugar, M. (2003). Learning language and learning history: A functional linguistics approach. TESOL Journal, 12(2), 21–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schleppegrell, M. J., Achugar, M., and Oteíza, T. (2004). The grammar of history: Enhancing content-based instruction through a functional focus on language. Tesol Quarterly, 38, 67–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schleppegrell, M. J. and Colombi, M. C. (2002). Developing Advanced Literacy in First and Second Languages: Meaning with Power, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Schleppegrell, M. J. and de Oliveira, L. C. (2006). An integrated language and content approach for history teachers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(4), 254–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schleppegrell, M. J., Greer, S., and Taylor, S. (2008). Literacy in history: Language and meaning. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 31(2), 174–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shanahan, T. and Shanahan, C. (2008). Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content area literacy. Harvard Education Review, 78, 40–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shanahan, T. and Shanahan, C. (2012) What is disciplinary literacy and why does it matter? Topics in Language Disorders. 32(1), 7–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shanahan, C., Shanahan, T., and Misichia, C. (2011). Analysis of expert readers in three disciplines: History, mathematics, and chemistry. Journal of Literacy Research, 43(4), 393–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simon-Vendenbergen, A.-M. (2003). Lexical metaphor and interpersonal meaning. In Simon-Vandenbergen, A.-M., Taverniers, M., and Ravelli, L., eds., Grammatical Metaphor: Views from Systemic Functional Linguistics. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 223–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simon-Vandenbergen, A. M., Taverniers, M., and Ravelli, L. (2003). Grammatical Metaphor: Views from Systemic Functional Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Southgate, B. (2001). History: What and Why? Ancient, Modern, and Postmodern Perspectives, 2nd edn. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Southgate, B. (2013). Why Bother with History? Ancient, Modern, and Postmodern motivations, Oxford and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stafutti, S. and Romagnoli, F. (2008). China: History and Treasures of an Ancient Civilization. Vercelli: White Star.Google Scholar

Stenglin, M. K. (2004). Packaging curiosities: Towards a grammar of three-dimensional space. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Sydney.Google Scholar

Stenglin, M. (2009). Space odyssey: Towards a social semiotic model of three-dimensional space. Visual Communication, 8, 35–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Szenes, E. (2017). The linguistic construction of business reasoning: Towards a language-based model of decision-making in undergraduate business. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Sydney.Google Scholar

Szenes, E. (2021). The linguistic construction of business decisions: A systemic functional linguistic perspective. Language, Context and Text, 3(2), 335–366.Google Scholar

Taboada, M., Carretero, M. and Hinnell, J. (2014). Loving and hating the movies in English, German, and Spanish. Languages in Contrast, 14(1), 12–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tann, K. (2010). Semogenesis of a nation: An iconography of Japanese identity. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Sydney.Google Scholar

Taverniers, M. (2006). Grammatical metaphor and lexical metaphor: Different perspectives on semantic variation. Neophilologus, 90(2), 321–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taverniers, M. (2017). Grammatical metaphor. In Bartlett, T. and O’Grady, G., eds., The Routledge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics. New York: Routledge, pp. 354–371.Google Scholar

Taverniers, M. (2018). Grammatical metaphor and grammaticalization: The case of metaphors of modality. Functions of Language, 25(1), 164–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taverniers, M. (2019). Semantics. In Thompson, G., Bowcher, W. L., Fontaine, L., and Schöntal, D., eds., The Cambridge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 55–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taverniers, M. (2021). Modelling interfaces with context in SFL: Stratification, instantiation, metafunctions. Functions of Language, 28(3), 291–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Unsworth, L. (2013) Point of view in picture books and animated movie adaptations. Scan 32(1), 28–37.Google Scholar

Van Alphen, F. and Carretero, M. (2015) The construction of the relation between national past and present in the appropriation of historical master narratives. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 49(3), 512–530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Veel, R. (2006). The Write it Right project: Linguistic modelling of secondary school and the workplace. In Whittaker, R., O’Donnell, M., and McCabe, A., eds., Language and Literacy: Functional Approaches, London: Continuum, pp. 66–92.Google Scholar

Ventola, E. (1987). The Structure of Social Interaction: A Systemic Approach to the Semiotics of Service Encounters. London: Pinter.Google Scholar

Vidal Lizama, M. and Montes, S. (2023). Escritura académica en la formación de estudiantes de Arte: Continuidades y cambios a lo largo de la carrera. In Moyano, E. I. and M. Lizama, Vidal, eds., Centros y programas en Latinoamérica: Opciones teóricas y pedagógicas para la enseñanza de la escritura disciplinar. Denver: WAC Clearinghouse, pp. 189–218.Google Scholar

Wang, P. (2021). Interpersonal grammar in Chinese. In Martin, J. R., Quiroz, B., and Figueredo, G., eds., Interpersonal Grammar: Systemic Functional Linguistic Theory and Description. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 96–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wertsch, J. (2002). Voices of Collective Remembering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

White, P. R. R. (1998). Extended reality, proto-nouns and the vernacular: Distinguishing the technological from the scientific. In Martin, J. R. and Veel, R., eds., Reading Science: Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourses of Science. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 266–296.Google Scholar

White, P. R. R. (2003). Beyond modality and hedging: A dialogic view of the language of intersubjective stance. Text and Talk, 23(2), 259–284.Google Scholar

White, P. R. R. (2010). Taking Bakhtin seriously: Dialogic effects in written, mass communicative discourse. Japanese Journal of Pragmatics, 12, 37–53.Google Scholar

White, P. R. R. (2012). Exploring the axiological workings of ‘reporter voice’ news stories: Attribution and attitudinal positioning. Discourse, Context and Media, 6(1), 57–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

White, P. R. R. (2021). Alignment, persuasiveness and the putative reader in opinion writing. Language, Context and Text, 3(2), 247–273.Google Scholar

Wignell, P., Martin, J. R., and Eggins, S. (1989). The discourse of geography: Ordering and explaining the experiential world. Linguistics and Education. 1(4), 359–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilkinson, E. P. (2000). Chinese History: A Manual (Revised and enlarged edn). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center for the Harvard-Yenching Institute.Google Scholar

Wineburg, S. (1999). Historical thinking and other unnatural acts. Kappan, 80(7), 488–499.Google Scholar

Wineburg, S. (2001) Historical Thinking and Other Unnatural Acts. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Wineburg, S. (2005). What does NCATE have to say to future history teachers? Not much. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(9), 658–665. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170508600909CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wu, H. (2018). An Historical Sketch of Chinese Historiography. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Publishing Co. / Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yang, B. (2018). Textual metaphor revisited. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 38(2), 205–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zappavigna, M. (2018). Searchable Talk: Hashtags and Social Media Metadiscourse, London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Zappavigna, M. and Martin, J. R. (2014). Mater Dolorosa: Negotiating support in NSW Youth Justice Conferencing. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 27, 263–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zappavigna, M. and Martin, J. R. (2018a). Discourse and Diversionary Justice: An Analysis of Youth Justice Conferencing. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zappavigna, M. and Martin, J. R. (2018b). Communing affiliation: Social tagging as a resource for aligning around values in social media. Discourse, Context and Media, 22, 4–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zavala, J. M. (2008). Los mapuches del siglo XVIII: Dinámica interétnica y estrategias de Resistencia. Temuco: Universidad Católica de Temuco.Google Scholar

Zorraquino, M. and Portolés, J. (1999). Los marcadores del discurso. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar