Book contents
- Dimensions of Phonological Stress
- Dimensions of Phonological Stress
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Introduction
- 1 Metrical Incoherence: Diachronic Sources and Synchronic Analysis
- 2 The Role of Phenomenal Accent
- 3 Foot Alignment in Spanish Secondary Stress
- 4 The Interaction of Metrical Structure and Tone in Standard Chinese
- 5 Prominence, Contrast, and the Functional Load Hypothesis: An Acoustic Investigation
- 6 Iquito: The Prosodic Colon and Evaluation of OT Stress Accounts
- 7 Investigating the Efficiency of Parsing Strategies for the Gradual Learning Algorithm
- 8 Covert Representations, Contrast, and the Acquisition of Lexical Accent
- 9 One or Many? In Search of the Default Stress in Greek
- 10 The Development of Rhythmic Preferences by Dutch-learning Infants
- 11 Acoustic Characteristics of Infant-directed Speech as a Function of Prosodic Typology
- Index
- References
5 - Prominence, Contrast, and the Functional Load Hypothesis: An Acoustic Investigation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 November 2016
Book contents
- Dimensions of Phonological Stress
- Dimensions of Phonological Stress
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Introduction
- 1 Metrical Incoherence: Diachronic Sources and Synchronic Analysis
- 2 The Role of Phenomenal Accent
- 3 Foot Alignment in Spanish Secondary Stress
- 4 The Interaction of Metrical Structure and Tone in Standard Chinese
- 5 Prominence, Contrast, and the Functional Load Hypothesis: An Acoustic Investigation
- 6 Iquito: The Prosodic Colon and Evaluation of OT Stress Accounts
- 7 Investigating the Efficiency of Parsing Strategies for the Gradual Learning Algorithm
- 8 Covert Representations, Contrast, and the Acquisition of Lexical Accent
- 9 One or Many? In Search of the Default Stress in Greek
- 10 The Development of Rhythmic Preferences by Dutch-learning Infants
- 11 Acoustic Characteristics of Infant-directed Speech as a Function of Prosodic Typology
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Dimensions of Phonological Stress , pp. 123 - 167Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Adank, P., Smits, R. and Hout, R. van. 2004. “A comparison of vowel normalization procedures for language variation research,” Journal of Acoustical Society of America 116(5): 3099–3107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Altmann, H. 2006. The perception and production of second language stress: A cross–linguistic experimental study. Ph.D. dissertation: University of Delaware.Google Scholar
Arvaniti, A. 2000. “The phonetics of stress in Greek,” Journal of Greek Linguistics 1: 9–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arvaniti, A. 2007. “Greek phonetics the state of the art,” Journal of Greek Linguistics 8(1): 97–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Athanasopoulou, A., Pincus, N. and Vogel, I. 2014. “Is there stress in Indonesian?” Paper presented at the 38th Penn Linguistics Conference (PLC). Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Baltazani, M. 2007. “Prosodic rhythm and the status of vowel reduction in Greek,” in Agathopoulou, E., Dimitrakopoulou, M. and Papadopoulou, D. (eds.), Selected papers on theoretical and applied linguistics: 17th International Symposium, vol. I, pp. 31–43. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of English, Department of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Berinstein, A. 1979. “A cross-linguistic study on the perception and production of stress,” UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 47: 1–59. Department of Linguistics, UCLA.Google Scholar
Blaho, S. and Szeredi, D. 2011. “(The non-existence of) secondary stress in Hungarian,” in Laczkó, T. and Ringen, C. O. (eds.), Approaches to Hungarian: Volume 12: Papers from the 2009 Debrecen conference, pp. 39–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Botinis, A. 1989. Stress and prosodic structure in Greek: A phonological, acoustic, physiological and perceptual study. Lund University Press.Google Scholar
Botinis, A. 1998. “Greek intonation,” in Hirst, D. and Di Cristo, A. (eds.), Intonation systems: A survey of twenty languages, pp. 280–310. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chávez‐Peón, M. 2010. The interaction of metrical structure, tone, and phonation types in Quiaviní Zapotec. Ph.D. dissertation: University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Contreras, H. 1964. “¿Tiene el español un acento de intensidad?” Boletín del Instituto de Filología de la Universidad de Chile 16: 237–239.Google Scholar
Dauer, R. M. 1980. “The reduction of unstressed high vowels in Modern Greek,” Journal of the International Phonetic Association 10: 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dauer, R. M. 1983. “Stress-timing and syllable-timing reanalyzed,” Journal of Phonetics 11: 51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dauer, R. M. 1987. “Phonetic and phonological components of language rhythm,” in Gamkrelidze, T. (ed.), Proceedings of the 11th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), pp. 447–450. Tallinn: Academy of Sciences of the Estonian S.S.R.Google Scholar
Domahs, U., Genç, S., Knaus, J., Wiese, R. and Kabak, B. 2012. “Processing (un)–predictable word stress: ERP evidence from Turkish,” Language and Cognitive Processes 28(3): 335–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupoux, E., Pallier, C., Sebastián, N. and Mehler, J. 1997. “A destressing ‘deafness’ in French?” Journal of Memory and Language 36: 406–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupoux, E., Peperkamp, S. and Sebastián-Gallés, N. 2001. “A robust paradigm to study stress ‘deafness’,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 110: 1606–1618.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fourakis, M., Botinis, A. and Katsaiti, M. 1999. “Acoustic characteristics of Greek vowels,” Phonetica 56: 28–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fry, D. B. 1965. “The dependence of stress judgments on vowel formant structure,” in Zwirner, E. and Bethge, W. (eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), pp. 306–311. Basel: Karger.Google Scholar
Genzel, S., Ishihara, S. and Surányi, B. 2015. “The prosodic expression of focus, contrast and givenness: A production study of Hungarian,” Lingua 165: 183–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Göksel, A. and Kerslake, C. 2005. Turkish: A comprehensive grammar. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Heuven, V. J. van. 2008. “Effect and artifact in the perception of stress; a cross-linguistic view,” unpublished presentation accessed from http://prosodia.upf.edu/home/arxiu/activitats/804_vanheuven.pptGoogle Scholar
Heuven, V. J. van and Sluijter, A. M. C. 1996. “Notes on the phonetics of word prosody,” in Goedemans, R., Hulst, H. G. van der and Visch, E. (eds.), Stress patterns of the world. Part 1: Background, pp. 233–269. The Hague: Leiden/Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar
Heuven, V. J. van and Jonge, M. de. 2011. “Spectral and temporal reduction as stress cues in Dutch,” Phonetica 68(3): 120–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hulst, H. G. van der. 2010. “Word accent: Terms, typologies and theories,” in Hulst, H. G. van der, Goedemans, R. and Zanten, E. van (eds.), A survey of word accentual patterns in the languages of the world, pp. 3–54. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulst, H. G. van der 2014. “The study of word accent and stress: past, present and future,” in Hulst, H. G. van der (2014) (ed.), Word stress: Theoretical and typological issues, pp. 3–55. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, L. 2009. “How (not) to do phonological typology: the case of pitch‐accent,” Language Sciences 31(2–3): 213–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kabak, B. 2013. “The extent of contrasts and regularities in phonology,” paper presented at the 10th Old World Conference in Phonology. Boğaziçi University. Istanbul, Turkey.Google Scholar
Kabak, B. and Vogel, I. 2001. “The phonological word and stress assignment in Turkish,” Phonology 18: 315–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kabak, B., Maniwa, K. and Kazanina, N. 2010. “Listeners use vowel harmony and word–final stress to spot nonsense words: A study of Turkish and French,” Laboratory Phonology 1: 207–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kálmán, L. and Nádasdy, Á. 1994. “A hangsúly” [“Stress”], in Kiefer, F. (ed.), Strukturális magyar nyelvtan: Fonológia [A structural grammar of Hungarian: Phonology], pp. 393–467. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó. (Cited in Blaho and Szeredi 2011.)Google Scholar
Kamali, B. 2011. Topics at the PF interface of Turkish. Ph.D. dissertation: Harvard University.Google Scholar
Katz, J. and Selkirk, E. 2011. “Contrastive focus vs. discourse-new: Evidence from phonetic prominence in English,” Language 87(4): 771–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konrot, A. 1981. “Physical correlates of linguistic stress in Turkish,” University of Sussex Language Centre Occasional Papers 24: 26–52.Google Scholar
Kornai, A. and Kálmán, L. 1988. “Hungarian sentence intonation,” in Hulst, H. van der and Smith, N. (eds.), Autosegmental studies on pitch accent, pp. 183–195. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, S. 2005. “Acoustic correlates of lexical accent in Turkish,” Journal of the International Phonetic Association 35(1): 73–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Llisterri, J., Machuca, M., de la Mota, C., Riera, M. and Ríos, A. 2003. “The perception of lexical stress in Spanish,” in Solé, M.-J., Recasens, D. and Romero, J. (eds.), Proceedings of the 15th International Conference of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), pp. 2023–2026. Barcelona: Causal Productions Pty Ltd.Google Scholar
Lobanov, B. 1971. “Classification of Russian vowels spoken by different listeners,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 49: 606–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mády, K. 2010. “Hungarian vowel quantity neutralization as a potential social marker,” Acta Linguistica Hungarica 57(2–3): 67–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quilis, A. 2012. “Shortening of long high vowels in Hungarian: A perceptual loss?” in Calamai, S., Celata, C. and Ciucci, L. (eds.), Sociophonetics, at the crossroads of speech variation, processing and communication, pp. 41–44. Pisa, Italy: Edizioni della Normale.Google Scholar
Mády, K. and Kleber, F. 2010. “Variation of pitch accent patterns in Hungarian,” paper presented at the 5th Speech Prosody Conference. Chicago, USA.Google Scholar
Mády, K. and Reichel, U. D. 2007. “Quantity distinction in the Hungarian vowel system – just theory or also reality?” in Trouvain, J. and Barry, W. J. (eds.), Proceedings of the 16th International Conference of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), pp. 1053–1056. Dudweiler: Pirrot.Google Scholar
Mády, K., Bombien, L. and Reichel, U. D. 2008. “Is Hungarian losing the vowel quantity distinction?” in Sock, R., Fuchs, S. and Laprie, Y. (eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International Seminar on Speech Production, pp. 449–452. France: INRIA.Google Scholar
Magdics, K. 1960. “A szóvégi magánhangzók rövidülése a köznyelvben” [“Shortening of word-final vowels in colloquial speech”], Nyelvtudományi Közlemények 62: 301–324. (Cited in Mády 2012.)Google Scholar
Navarro Tomás, T. 1964. “La medida de la intensidad,” Boletín del Instituto de Filología de la Universidad de Chile 16: 231–235.Google Scholar
Nicolaidis, K. and Rispoli, R. 2005. “The effect of noise on speech production: An acoustic study,” Studies in Greek Linguistics 25: 415–426.Google Scholar
Nicolaidis, K. and Sfakianaki, A. 2007. “An acoustic analysis of vowels produced by Greek speakers with hearing impairment,” in Trouvain, J. and Barry, W. J. (eds.), Proceedings of the 16th International Conference of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), pp. 1969–1972. Dudweiler: Pirrot.Google Scholar
Ortega-Llebaría, M. 2006. “Phonetic cues to stress and accent in Spanish,” in Díaz–Campos, M. (ed.), Selected proceedings of the 2nd conference of Laboratory Approaches to Spanish Phonology, pp. 104–118. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Ortega-Llebaría, M. and Prieto, P. 2007. “Disentangling stress from accent in Spanish: Production patterns of the stress contrast in deaccented syllables,” in Prieto, P., Mascaró, J. and Solé, M. J. (eds.), Segmental and prosodic issues in Romance phonology, pp. 155–175. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortega–Llebaría, M. and Prieto, P. 2010. “Acoustic correlates of stress in Central Catalan and Castilian Spanish,” Language and Speech 54(1): 73–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papazachariou, D. and Politis, P. 2007. “Prosodic markers of a narrative type: The case of Greek TV news reports,” in Tsoulas, G. (ed.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Greek Linguistics (ICGL).Google Scholar
Potisuk, S., Gandour, J. and Harper, M. 1996. “Acoustic correlates of stress in Thai,” Phonetica 53: 200–220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peperkamp, S. 2004. “Lexical exceptions in stress systems: Arguments from early language acquisition and adult speech perception,” Language 80: 98–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peperkamp, S. and Dupoux, E. 2002. “A typological study of stress ‘deafness’,” in Gussenhoven, C. and Warner, N. (eds.), Laboratory phonology 7, pp. 203–240. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Peperkamp, S., Vendelin, I. and Dupoux, E. 2010. “Perception of predictable stress: A cross-linguistic investigation,” Journal of Phonetics 38: 422–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J. 2003. “Phonetic diversity, statistical learning, and acquisition of phonology,” Language and Speech 46: 115–154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Puskás, G. 2000. Word order in Hungarian: The syntax of A’–positions. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pycha, A. 2006. “A duration-based solution to the problem of stress realization in Turkish,” UC Berkeley phonology lab annual report, pp. 141–151. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Quilis, A. 1971. “Caracterización fonética del acento español,” Travaux de Linguistique et de Littérature 9: 53–72.Google Scholar
Quilis, A. 1981. Fonética acústica de la lengua española. Madrid: Biblioteca Románica Hispánica, Gredos.Google Scholar
Remijsen, B. 2002. “Lexically contrastive accent and lexical tone in Ma’ya,” in Gussenhoven, C. and Warner, N. (eds.), Laboratory phonology 7, pp. 585–614. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samaras, M. 1974. “Study of the influence of the accent on Modern Greek vowel formant structure,” Bulletin de l’Institut de Phonétique de Grenoble 3: 129–138.Google Scholar
Siptár, P. and Törkenczy, M. 2000. The phonology of Hungarian. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sluijter, A. M. C., and Heuven, V. J. van. 1996. “Spectral balance as an acoustic correlate of linguistic stress,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 100: 2471–2485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sluijter, A. M. C., Heuven, V. J. van and Pacilly, J. J. A. 1997. “Spectral balance as a cue in the perception of linguistic stress,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 101: 503–513.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Surányi, B., Ishihara, S. and Schubö, F. 2012. “Syntax–prosody mapping, topic–comment structure and stress–focus correspondence in Hungarian,” in Prieto, P. and Elordieta, G. (eds.), Prosody and meaning, pp. 35–71. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szeredi, D. 2008. “Centralized vowels in Hungarian,” in Kálmán, L. (ed.), Papers from the Mókus Conference. Budapest: Tinta Publishing House.Google Scholar
Varga, L. 2002. Intonation and stress: Evidence from Hungarian. Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, I., Athanasopoulou, A. and Pincus, N. 2015. “Acoustic properties of prominence in Hungarian and the Functional Load Hypothesis,” in Kiss, K. É., Surányi, B. and Dékány, É. (eds.), Approaches to Hungarian 14, pp. 267–292. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, I and Kenesei, I. 1987. “The interface between phonology and other components of grammar: The case of Hungarian,” Phonology Yearbook 4: 243–263.Google Scholar
Wetzels, L. and Meira, S. 2010. “A survey of South American stress systems,” in Hulst, H. G. van der, Goedemans, R. and Zanten, E. van (eds.), A survey of word accentual patterns in the languages of the world, pp. 313–380. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, L. and Mády, K. 2008. “The long and the short and the final: phonological vowel length and prosodic timing in Hungarian,” in Barbosa, P. A., Madureira, S. and Reis, C. (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Speech Prosody Conference, pp. 363–366.Google Scholar
Winn, M., Blodgett, A. J., Bauman, A., Bowles, L., Charters, A., Rytting, C. and Shamoo, J. 2008. “Vietnamese monophthong vowel production by native speakers and American adult learners,” Proceedings of Acoustics 08, pp. 6125–6130. Paris, France.Google Scholar
- 20
- Cited by