Book contents
- Dimensions of Phonological Stress
- Dimensions of Phonological Stress
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Introduction
- 1 Metrical Incoherence: Diachronic Sources and Synchronic Analysis
- 2 The Role of Phenomenal Accent
- 3 Foot Alignment in Spanish Secondary Stress
- 4 The Interaction of Metrical Structure and Tone in Standard Chinese
- 5 Prominence, Contrast, and the Functional Load Hypothesis: An Acoustic Investigation
- 6 Iquito: The Prosodic Colon and Evaluation of OT Stress Accounts
- 7 Investigating the Efficiency of Parsing Strategies for the Gradual Learning Algorithm
- 8 Covert Representations, Contrast, and the Acquisition of Lexical Accent
- 9 One or Many? In Search of the Default Stress in Greek
- 10 The Development of Rhythmic Preferences by Dutch-learning Infants
- 11 Acoustic Characteristics of Infant-directed Speech as a Function of Prosodic Typology
- Index
- References
1 - Metrical Incoherence: Diachronic Sources and Synchronic Analysis
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 November 2016
Book contents
- Dimensions of Phonological Stress
- Dimensions of Phonological Stress
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Introduction
- 1 Metrical Incoherence: Diachronic Sources and Synchronic Analysis
- 2 The Role of Phenomenal Accent
- 3 Foot Alignment in Spanish Secondary Stress
- 4 The Interaction of Metrical Structure and Tone in Standard Chinese
- 5 Prominence, Contrast, and the Functional Load Hypothesis: An Acoustic Investigation
- 6 Iquito: The Prosodic Colon and Evaluation of OT Stress Accounts
- 7 Investigating the Efficiency of Parsing Strategies for the Gradual Learning Algorithm
- 8 Covert Representations, Contrast, and the Acquisition of Lexical Accent
- 9 One or Many? In Search of the Default Stress in Greek
- 10 The Development of Rhythmic Preferences by Dutch-learning Infants
- 11 Acoustic Characteristics of Infant-directed Speech as a Function of Prosodic Typology
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Dimensions of Phonological Stress , pp. 9 - 48Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Aion, Nora. 2003. Selected topics in Nootka and Tübatulabal phonology. New York, NY: City University of New York dissertation.Google Scholar
Bennett, Ryan. 2013a. The uniqueness of metrical structure: rhythmic phonotactics in Huariapano. Phonology 30. 355–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Ryan. 2013b. A re-evaluation of disjoint footing. http://pantheon.yale.edu/%7Ertb27/pdfs/Bennett2013_Huariapano_handout.pdf (July 28, 2014)Google Scholar
Bereczki, Gábor. 1988. Geschichte der wolgafinnischen Sprachen. In Sinor, Denis (ed.), The Uralic languages: Description, history and foreign influences, 314–350. New York: E. J. Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booker, Karen. 2005. Muskogean historical phonology. In Hardy, Heather & Scancarelli, Janine (eds.), Native languages of the Southeastern United States, 246–298. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Broadwell, George A. 2005. Choctaw. In Hardy, Heather & Scancarelli, Janine (eds.) Native languages of the Southeastern United States, 157–199. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Broadwell, George A.. 2006. A Choctaw reference grammar. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Byrd, D. M. 1994. Articulatory timing in English consonant sequences. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA dissertation. [UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 86].Google Scholar
Carolina, González. 2003. The effect of stress and foot structure on consonantal processes. Los Angeles, CA: USC dissertation.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1977. Accent and related phenomena in the Five Nations Iroquois languages. In Hyman, Larry (ed.), Studies in stress and accent [Southern California Occasional Papers in Linguistics 4], 169–181. University of Southern California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1996. Sketch of Seneca, an Iroquoian language. In Sturtevant, William C. (ed.), Handbook of North American Indians. Vol. 17, Languages, 225–253. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
Cho, Taehong & Patricia, Keating. 2001. Articulatory strengthening at the onset of prosodic domains in Korean. Journal of Phonetics 28. 155–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churchyard, Henry. 1989. Vowel reduction in Tiberian Biblical Hebrew as evidence for a sub-foot level of maximally trimoraic metrical constituents. Coyote Papers 2, Proceedings of the Arizona Phonology Conference. 1–19.Google Scholar
Dilley, L., Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. & Ostendorf, M., 1996. Glottalization of word-initial vowels as a function of prosodic structure. Journal of Phonetics 24. 423–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 2004. The Jarawara language of southern Amazonia. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doherty, Brian. 1993. The acoustic-phonetic correlates of Cayuga word-stress. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University dissertation.Google Scholar
Dresher, B. Elan. 1980. Metrical structure and secondary stress in Tiberian Hebrew. In Chapin, C. (ed.), Brown Working Papers in Linguistics 4. 24–37.Google Scholar
Dresher, B. Elan. 1994. The prosodic basis of the Tiberian Hebrew system of accents. Language 70. 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dresher, B. Elan. 2009. Stress assignment in Tiberian Hebrew. In Cairns, Charles & Raimy, Eric (eds.), Contemporary views on architecture and representations in phonological theory, 213–224. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dresher, B. Elan & Lahiri, Aditi 1991. The Germanic foot: metrical coherence in Old English. Linguistic Inquiry 22. 251–286.Google Scholar
Dyck, Carrie. 2009. Defining the word in Cayuga (Iroquoian). International Journal of American Linguistics 75. 571–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elias Ulloa, Jose. 2006. Theoretical aspects of panoan metrical phonology: disyllabic footing and contextual syllable weight. Ph.D dissertation, Rutgers University. (ROA-804, Rutgers Optimality Archive, http://roa.rutgers.edu, July 28, 2014)Google Scholar
Foster, Michael. 1982. Alternating weak and strong syllables in Cayuga words. International Journal of American Linguistics 48. 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goedemans, Rob. 2010. A typology of stress patterns. In Hulst, Harry van der, Goedemans, Rob & Zanten, Ellen van (eds.), A survey of word accentual patterns in the languages of the world, 647–666. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González, Carolina. 2003. The effect of stress and foot structure on consonantal processes. Los Angeles, CA: USC dissertation.Google Scholar
González, Carolina. 2005. Phonologically-conditioned allomorphy in Panoan: towards an analysis. In Heinz, Jeffrey, Martin, Andrew & Pertsova, Katya (eds.), UCLA working papers in linguistics, vol. 11 (Papers in Phonology 6), 39–56. University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
González, Carolina. 2007. Typological evidence for the separation between stress and foot structure. In Miestamo, Matti & Wälchli, Bernhard (eds.), New challenges in typology: broadening the horizons and redefining the foundations, 55–75. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Matthew. 2000. The tonal basis of final weight criteria. Chicago Linguistics Society 36. 141–156.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew. 2002. A factorial typology of quantity insensitive stress. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20. 491–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Matthew. 2003. The phonology of pitch accent placement in Chickasaw. Phonology 20. 173–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Matthew. 2004. A phonological and phonetic study of word-level stress in Chickasaw. International Journal of American Linguistics 70. 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Matthew. 2005. An autosegmental/metrical model of Chickasaw intonation. In Jun, Sun-Ah (ed.), Prosodic typology: the phonology of intonation and phrasing, 301–330. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Matthew. 2014. Disentangling stress and pitch-accent: a typology of prominence at different prosodic levels. In van der Hulst, Harry (ed.), Word stress: theoretical and typological issues, 83–118. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Matthew & Munro, Pamela. 2007. A phonetic study of final vowel lengthening in Chickasaw. International Journal of American Linguistics 73. 293–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Matthew, Munro, Pamela & Ladefoged, Peter. 2000. Some phonetic structures of Chickasaw. Anthropological Linguistics 42. 366–400.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew, Martin, Jack & Langley, Linda. 2015 . Some phonetic structures of Koasati. International Journal of American Linguistics 81(1). 83–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Mary. 1977. Tonal accent in Creek. In Hyman, Larry (ed.), Studies in stress and accent [Southern California Occasional Papers in Linguistics 4], 195–208. Los Angeles: University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Vergnaud, Jean-Roger. 1987. An essay on stress. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Idsardi, William. 1995. Stress and metrical structure. In Goldsmith, John (ed.), The handbook of phonological theory, 403–443. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce. 1980. A metrical theory of stress rules. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation. Published in 1985 by Garland Press, New York.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce. 1985. Iambic and trochaic rhythm in stress rules. Berkeley Linguistics Society 13. 429–446.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce. 1989. The prosodic hierarchy in meter. In Kiparsky, Paul & Youmans, Gilbert (eds.), Rhythm and meter, 201–260. Orlando: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Bruce. 1995. Metrical stress theory: principles and case studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey. 1977. Uto-Aztecan morphophonemics. International Journal of American Linguistics 43. 27–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helimski, E. 1998. Nganasan. In Abondolo, Daniel (ed.), The Uralic languages, 480–515. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hermans, Ben. 2011. The representation of stress. In Oostendorp, Marc Van, Ewen, Colin J., Hume, Elizabeth & Rice, Keren (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, 980–1002. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hulst, Harry van der. 1996. Separating primary accent and secondary accent. In Hulst, Harry van der, Goedemans, Rob & Visch, Ellis (eds.), Stress patterns of the world, 1–26. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar
Hulst, Harry van der. 2014. Representing rhythm. In Hulst, Harry van der (ed.), Word stress: theoretical and typological issues, 325–365. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulst, Harry van der & Goedemans, Rob. 2009. StressTyp database. www.unileiden.net/stresstyp/manual.htm (July 28, 2014)Google Scholar
Hulst, Harry van der 2014. The separation of accent and rhythm: evidence from StressTyp. In Hulst, Harry van der (ed.), Word stress: theoretical and typological issues, 119–148. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Larry. 1977. On the nature of linguistic stress. In Hyman, Larry (ed.), Studies in stress and accent [Southern California Occasional Papers in Linguistics 4], 37–82. University of Southern California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Idsardi, William. 2009. Calculating metrical structure. In Cairns, Charles & Raimy, Eric (eds.), Contemporary views on architecture and representations in phonological theory, 191–211. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kager, René. 1989. A metrical theory of stress and destressing in English and Dutch. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Keating, P., Cho, T., Fougeron, C. & Hsu, C.. 2003. Domain-initial articulatory strengthening in four languages. In Local, J., Ogden, R. & Temple, R. (eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology 6: phonetic interpretation, 143–161. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael. 1997. Quality-sensitive stress. Rivista di Linguistica 9. 157–188.Google Scholar
Leer, Jeff. 1985. Prosody in Alutiiq. In Krauss, Michael (ed.), Yupik Eskimo prosodic systems: descriptive and comparative studies, 77–134. Fairbanks: Alaska Native Language Center.Google Scholar
Liberman, Mark & Prince, Alan. 1977. On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry 8. 249–336.Google Scholar
Manaster Ramer, Alexis. 1992. Proto-Uto-Aztecan phonology: evidence from Tübatulabal noun morphophonemics. International Journal of American Linguistics 58. 436–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Jack. 2011. A grammar of creek (Muskogee). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Jack and Johnson, Keith. 2002. An acoustic study of “tonal accent” in Creek. International Journal of American Linguistics 68. 28–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John. 1979. Formal problems in Semitic phonology and morphology. Cambidge, MA: MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Melinger, Alyssa. 2002. Foot structure and accent in Seneca. International Journal of American Linguistics 68. 287–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michelson, Karin. 1988. A comparative study of Lake-Iroquoian accent. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro, Pamela 2005. Chickasaw. In Hardy, Heather & Scancarelli, Janine (eds.), Native languages of the Southeastern United States, 114–156. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.Google Scholar
Munro, Pamela Munro, Pamela & Willmond, Catherine. 1994. Chickasaw: an analytical dictionary. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Munro, Pamela 2005. Chikashshanompa’ kilanompoli’. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
Munro, Pamela Munro, Pamela & Ulrich, Charles. 1984. Structure-preservation and Western Muskogean rhythmic lengthening. West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 3. 191–202.Google Scholar
Oostendorp, Marc van. 1995. Vowel quality and syllable projection. Tilburg, Netherlands: University of Tilburg dissertation.Google Scholar
Parker, Steve. 1994. Coda epenthesis in Huariapano. International Journal of American Linguistics 60. 95–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, Steve. 1998. Disjoint metrical tiers and positional markedness in Huariapano. www.gial.edu/images/gialens/vol7-1/Parker_Huariapano.pdf (July 28, 2014).Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet & Talkin, David. 1992. Lenition of /h/ and glottal stop. In Docherty, G. & Ladd, D. R. (eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology II: gesture, segment, prosody, 90–117. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince, Alan. 1975. The phonology and morphology of Tiberian Hebrew. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Rappaport, Malka. 1984. Issues in the phonology of Tiberian Hebrew. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Sammallahti, Pekka. 1988. Historical phonology of the Uralic languages. In Sinor, Denis (ed.), The Uralic languages: Description, history and foreign influences, 478–554. New York: E. J. Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapir, Edward. 1930. Southern Paiute, a Shoshonean language. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 65. 1–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1984. Phonology and syntax: the relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Vaysman, Olga. 2009. Segmental alternations and metrical theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Voegelin, Charles Frederick. 1935. Tübatulabal grammar. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 34. 55–190.Google Scholar
Werle, Adam. 2002. The Southern Wakashan one-foot word. In Gillon, Carrie, Sawai, Naomi & Wojdak, Rachel (eds.), Papers for the 37th International Conference on Salish and Neighbouring Languages, vol. 9, 382–397. Vancouver: University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
- 3
- Cited by