Book contents
- The Dialogical Mind
- The Dialogical Mind
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Figures
- Preface and acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I ‘Superior’ and ‘inferior’ thinking and knowing
- Part II Dialogicality as epistemology of daily life and of professional practices
- 4 Ethics of the Ego–Alter–Object relations
- 5 Epistemic trust
- 6 Epistemic responsibility
- 7 The dialogical mind in professional practices
- Conclusion to Part II
- References
- Index
4 - Ethics of the Ego–Alter–Object relations
from Part II - Dialogicality as epistemology of daily life and of professional practices
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 August 2016
- The Dialogical Mind
- The Dialogical Mind
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Figures
- Preface and acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I ‘Superior’ and ‘inferior’ thinking and knowing
- Part II Dialogicality as epistemology of daily life and of professional practices
- 4 Ethics of the Ego–Alter–Object relations
- 5 Epistemic trust
- 6 Epistemic responsibility
- 7 The dialogical mind in professional practices
- Conclusion to Part II
- References
- Index
Summary
This Chapter is concerned with axioms and concepts of dialogical epistemology derived from the Ego-Alter interdependence. This interdependence is always about something, i.e. about objects or events, or about reflections on the Self’s and the Other(s)’ thoughts, imaginations and actions. I have referred to triangular relations between the Ego-Alter-Object in two ways. First, following Serge Moscovici’s ideas, there is a triangular relation between the Ego-Alter-Object of knowledge. Second, following the ideas of the anthropologist Louis Dumont, I have introduced the consumerist triadic relation the Ego-Alter-Thing of desire. Ethics in these two kinds of triangle follows different routes. In the former case, ethical relations between the Ego-Alter stem directly from intersubjectivity and the search for social recognition as the primary ontological relations. In the latter case, the ethical relations between the Ego-Alter are masked by the apparent priority given to the relation between the Self and the Thing of desire. In this case, the Ego’s search for social recognition, which superficially appears as craving for the Thing of desire, is in fact the desire for the desire of the Other’s desire. In other words, obtaining Objects of Others provides the Self with a social status and thus, with illusory social recognition.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Dialogical MindCommon Sense and Ethics, pp. 97 - 126Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016