Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T06:23:30.923Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Estimating the policy rule from money market rates when target rate changes are lumpy

from Part II - New techniques

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2014

Jean-Sébastien Fontaine
Affiliation:
Bank of Canada
Jagjit S. Chadha
Affiliation:
National Institute of Economic and Social Research, London
Alain C. J. Durré
Affiliation:
European Central Bank, Frankfurt
Michael A. S. Joyce
Affiliation:
Bank of England
Lucio Sarno
Affiliation:
City University London
Get access

Summary

9.1 Introduction

Many Central Banks change their target (or policy) rates via discrete increments, typically multiples of 0.25%. Moreover, these changes almost always occur following scheduled meetings and the schedule of meetings is known well in advance to market participants. The intent behind this operational procedure is, or is understood to be, to increase the transparency of the Central Bank's actions and to reduce unnecessary variations in interest rates. Presumably, transparency increases the predictability of future policy rates, tightens the relationship of short-term yields to policy decisions and enhances the effectiveness of the monetary policy transmission mechanism. Indeed, a large literature has shown that short-term interest rates and, in the case of the US, Fed funds futures rates, provide the best forecasts of future target rates and can be used to estimate monetary policy shocks.

An accurate description of expectations as measured from short-term interest rates is crucial for policymakers and market participants. In the following, I compare dynamic term structure models for short-term interest rates that take into account the known schedule of policy meetings. One set of models is based on a discrete support, consistent with the fact that target changes take discrete increments, and another set of models is based on the standard Gaussian approximation. The sample is daily and runs until the end of 2011. A second set of results analyzes the information content of futures rates throughout the period where the target reached its lower bound in the US.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×