Book contents
- Demonstratives in Cross-Linguistic Perspective
- Language, culture and cognition
- Demonstratives in Cross-Linguistic Perspective
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- 1 Introduction: Demonstratives: Patterns in Diversity
- 2 The Demonstrative Questionnaire: “THIS” and “THAT” in Comparative Perspective
- 3 Lao Demonstrative Determiners Nii4 and Nan4: An Intensionally Discrete Distinction for Extensionally Analogue Space
- 4 Dalabon Exophoric Uses of Demonstratives
- 5 Brazilian Portuguese: Non-contrastive Exophoric Use of Demonstratives in the Spoken Language
- 6 “See This Sitting One”: Demonstratives and Deictic Classifiers in Goemai
- 7 Tzeltal: The Demonstrative System
- 8 Yucatec Demonstratives in Interaction: Spontaneous versus Elicited Data
- 9 Lavukaleve: Exophoric Usage of Demonstratives
- 10 Tiriyó: Non-contrastive Exophoric Uses of Demonstratives
- 11 Trumai: Non-contrastive Exophoric Uses of Demonstratives
- 12 Saliba-Logea: Exophoric Demonstratives
- 13 Warao Demonstratives
- 14 Chukchi: Non-contrastive Spatial Demonstrative Usage
- 15 Yélî Dnye: Demonstratives in the Language of Rossel Island, Papua New Guinea
- 16 Tidore: Non-contrastive Demonstratives
- 17 The Jahai Multi-term Demonstrative System: What’s Spatial about It?
- Index
- References
10 - Tiriyó: Non-contrastive Exophoric Uses of Demonstratives
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 July 2018
Book contents
- Demonstratives in Cross-Linguistic Perspective
- Language, culture and cognition
- Demonstratives in Cross-Linguistic Perspective
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- 1 Introduction: Demonstratives: Patterns in Diversity
- 2 The Demonstrative Questionnaire: “THIS” and “THAT” in Comparative Perspective
- 3 Lao Demonstrative Determiners Nii4 and Nan4: An Intensionally Discrete Distinction for Extensionally Analogue Space
- 4 Dalabon Exophoric Uses of Demonstratives
- 5 Brazilian Portuguese: Non-contrastive Exophoric Use of Demonstratives in the Spoken Language
- 6 “See This Sitting One”: Demonstratives and Deictic Classifiers in Goemai
- 7 Tzeltal: The Demonstrative System
- 8 Yucatec Demonstratives in Interaction: Spontaneous versus Elicited Data
- 9 Lavukaleve: Exophoric Usage of Demonstratives
- 10 Tiriyó: Non-contrastive Exophoric Uses of Demonstratives
- 11 Trumai: Non-contrastive Exophoric Uses of Demonstratives
- 12 Saliba-Logea: Exophoric Demonstratives
- 13 Warao Demonstratives
- 14 Chukchi: Non-contrastive Spatial Demonstrative Usage
- 15 Yélî Dnye: Demonstratives in the Language of Rossel Island, Papua New Guinea
- 16 Tidore: Non-contrastive Demonstratives
- 17 The Jahai Multi-term Demonstrative System: What’s Spatial about It?
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Demonstratives in Cross-Linguistic Perspective , pp. 222 - 241Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Carlin, E. (1999). WYSIWYG in Trio: The grammaticalized expression of truth and knowledge. Journal of the Anthropological Society of Oxford (JASO), 30(3), 233–245.Google Scholar
Carlin, E.(2003). The Experiencer role in the expression of mental states and activities in Trio (Cariban). Amérindia, 23, 161–182.Google Scholar
Carlin, E.(2004). A grammar of Trio: A Cariban language of Suriname. Duisburger Arbeiten zur Sprach- und Kulturwissenschaft, vol. 55. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang (Europäischer Verlag der Wissenschaften).Google Scholar
Carlin, E.(2006). The verbalizers in Trio (Cariban): A semantic description. In Rowicka, G. J. & Carlin, E. B., eds., What’s in a verb? Studies in the verbal morphology of the languages of the Americas. LOT Occasional Series. Utrecht: LOT, pp. 143–157.Google Scholar
Carlin, E.(2011). Theticity in Trio (Cariban). International Journal of American Linguistics, 77, 1–31.Google Scholar
Campbell, L. (2012). Classification of the indigenous languages of South America. In Campbell, L. & Grondona, V., eds., The indigenous languages of South America: A comprehensive guide. The World of Linguistics series, vol. 2. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 59–166.Google Scholar
De Goeje, C. H. (1909). Grammaire et vocabulaire de la langue trio. In Études linguistiques caraïbes. Verhandelingen der Koninklijke Akademie van Wetenschappen te Amsterdam, Afdeeling Letterkunde, Nieuwe Reeks, Deel X, no. 3. Amsterdam: Johannes Müller, pp. 180–243.Google Scholar
Derbyshire, D. C. (1999). Carib. In Dixon, R. M. W. & Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y., eds., The Amazonian languages. Cambridge Language Surveys. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 23–64.Google Scholar
Enfield, N. J. (2003). Demonstratives in space and interactional: Data from Lao speakers and implications for semantic analysis. Language, 79(1), 82–117.Google Scholar
Frikel, P. (1961). Fases culturais e aculturação intertribal no Tumucumaque. New Series of the Boletim do Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi (Antropologia), vol. 16. Belèm: Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi.Google Scholar
Gildea, S. (1998). On reconstructing grammar: Comparative Cariban morphosyntax. Oxford Studies in Anthropological Linguistics, vol. 18. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gildea, S.(2012). Linguistic studies in the Cariban family. In Campbell, L. & Grondona, V., eds., The indigenous languages of South America: A comprehensive guide. The World of Linguistics series, vol. 2. Berlin/Boston: Mouton De Gruyter, pp. 441–494.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J., eds., Syntax and semantics. Vol. III: Speech acts. New York: Academic Press, pp. 41–58.Google Scholar
Hanks, W. F. (2012). Evidentiality in social interaction. In Nuckolls, J. & Michael, L., eds., Evidentiality in interaction. Special edition of Pragmatics and Society, 3(2), 169–180.Google Scholar
Kaufman, T. (1994). The native languages of South America. In Moseley, C. & Asher, R. E., eds., Atlas of the world’s languages. New York, London: Routledge, pp. 46–76.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C.(2000). Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicatures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C. & Schmitt, B. (1993). Animals in a row. In Levinson, S. C., ed., Cognition and space kit (version 1.0): July 1993. Nijmegen: Cognitive Anthropology Research Group, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, pp. 65–69.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C. (2003). Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge, Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Meira, S. (1998). Rhythmic stress in Tiriyó (Cariban). International Journal of American Linguistics, 64(4), 352–378.Google Scholar
Meira, S.(1999b). Syllable reduction and ghost syllables in Tiriyó. In Hwang, S. J. J. & Lommel, A. R., eds., XXV LACUS Forum. Fullerton, CA: The Linguistic Association of Canada and the United States (LACUS), pp. 125–131.Google Scholar
Meira, S.(2000a). Reduplication in Tiriyó (Cariban). Languages of the World, no. 17. Munich: LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar
Meira, S.(2000b). A reconstruction of Proto-Taranoan: Phonology and morphology. Munich: LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar
Meira, S.(2001). Linguistic theory and linguistic description: The case of Tiriyó [h]. International Journal of American Linguistics, 67, 119–135.Google Scholar
Meira, S.(2003a). “Addressee effects” in demonstrative systems: The cases of Tiriyó and Brazilian Portuguese. In Lenz, F., ed., Deictic conceptualization of space, time and person. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, vol. 112. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 3–12.Google Scholar
Meira, S.(2003b). Les démonstratifs proximaux non-animés de la langue tiriyo (caribe): Une étude de corpus. Amerindia, 28, 183–200.Google Scholar
Meira, S.(2004). Mental state postpositions in Tiriyó and other Cariban languages. Linguistic Typology, 8, 213–241.Google Scholar
Meira, S.(2005). Cariban languages. In Brown, K. L., ed., Encyclopedia of language and linguistics. 2nd edn. Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 199–204.Google Scholar
Meira, S.(2007). Orações relativas em línguas Karíb. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Ciências Humanas, 2(1), 105–121.Google Scholar
Meira, S.(2011). Tiriyo. In Bonvini, E., Busuttil, J. & Peyraube, A., eds., Dictionnaire des langues. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, pp. 1495–1501.Google Scholar
Meira, S. & Terrill, A. (2005). Contrasting contrastive demonstratives in Tiriyó and Lavukaleve. Linguistics, 43(6), 1131–1152.Google Scholar
Pederson, E., Danziger, E., Wilkins, D. P., Levinson, S. C., Kita, S. & Senft, G. (1998). Semantic typology and spatial conceptualization. Language, 74(3), 557–589.Google Scholar
Rivière, P. (1969). Marriage among the Trio: A principle of social organization. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Van Geenhoven, V. & Warner, N., eds. (1999). Annual report 1999. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar
Wilkins, D. P. (1999, this volume). The 1999 demonstrative questionnaire: ‘this’ and ‘that’ in comparative perspective. In Wilkins, D. P., ed., Manual for the 1999 field season. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
- 8
- Cited by