Abizadeh, Arash. “Does Collective Identity Presuppose an Other? On the Alleged Incoherence of Global Solidarity.” American Political Science Review 99.1 (2005): 45–60.Google Scholar

Abts, Koen, and Rummens, Stefan. “Populism versus Democracy.” Political Studies 55.2 (2007): 405–24.Google Scholar

Akkerman, Agnes, Mudde, Cas, and Zaslove, Andrej. “How Populist Are the People? Measuring Populist Attitudes in Voters.” Comparative Political Studies 47.9 (2014): 1324–53.Google Scholar

Anderson, Carol. White Rage. London: Bloomsbury, 2020.Google Scholar

Anderson, Elizabeth. “Democracy: Instrumental vs. Non-Instrumental Value.” In Contemporary Debates in Political Philosophy, ed. Christiano, Thomas and Christman, John. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009, 213–27.Google Scholar

Anderson, Elizabeth. The Imperative of Integration. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Anderson, Elizabeth S. “What Is the Point of Equality?” Ethics 109.2 (1999): 287–337.Google Scholar

Appiah, Kwame Anthony. The Ethics of Identity. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Appiah, Kwame Anthony. The Honor Code: How Moral Revolutions Happen. New York: W. W. Norton, 2010.Google Scholar

Applebaum, Anne. Twilight of Democracy: The Failure of Politics and the Parting of Friends. London: Penguin, 2020.Google Scholar

Arato, Andrew. “Political Theology and Populism.” Social Research 80.1 (2013): 143–72.Google Scholar

Arato, Andrew, and Cohen, Jean L.. “Civil Society, Populism, and Religion.” Constellations 24.3 (2017): 283–95.Google Scholar

Arato, Andrew, and Cohen, Jean L.. Populism and Civil Society: The Challenge to Constitutional Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022.Google Scholar

Ash, Timothy Garton. “Only Respect for the ‘Left Behind’ Can Turn the Populist Tide.” The Guardian, September 28, 2017. www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/sep/28/far-right-rightwing-nationalism-populist [accessed February 4, 2021].Google Scholar

Barry, Brian. Culture and Equality: An Egalitarian Critique of Multiculturalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Beerbohm, Eric. “The Problem of Clean Hands: Negotiated Compromise in Lawmaking.” In Compromise: Nomos LIX, ed. Knight, Jack. New York: New York University Press, 2018, 1–52.Google Scholar

Bejan, Teresa M. Mere Civility: Disagreement and the Limits of Toleration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Bellamy, Richard. “Democracy, Compromise and the Representation Paradox: Coalition Government and Political Integrity.” Government and Opposition 47.3 (2012): 441–65.Google Scholar

Benhabib, Seyla. The Claims of Culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Benjamin, Martin. Splitting the Difference: Compromise and Integrity in Ethics and Politics. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1990.Google Scholar

Berlin, Isaiah. “Two Concepts of Liberty.” In Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1969, 118–72.Google Scholar

Berman, Sheri. “The Causes of Populism in the West.” Annual Review of Political Science 24 (2021): 71–88.Google Scholar

Berman, Sheri. “Populism Is a Symptom Rather than a Cause: Democratic Disconnect, the Decline of the Center-Left, and the Rise of Populism in Western Europe.” Polity 51.4 (2019): 654–67.Google Scholar

Bhambra, Gurminder K. “Brexit, Trump, and ‘Methodological Whiteness’: On the Misrecognition of Race and Class.” British Journal of Sociology 68.S1 (2017): 214–32.Google Scholar

Bickerton, Christopher, and Accetti, Carlo Invernizzi. “Populism and Technocracy: Opposites or Complements?” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 20.2 (2017): 186–206.Google Scholar

Bird, Colin. “Status, Identity, and Respect.” Political Theory 32.2 (2004): 207–32.Google Scholar

Bohman, James. “Deliberative Democracy and Effective Social Freedom: Capabilities, Resources, and Opportunities.” In Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, ed. Bohman, James and Rehg, William. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997, 321–48.Google Scholar

Bohman, James. Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Bonikowski, Bart. “Ethno-Nationalist Populism and the Mobilization of Collective Resentment.” British Journal of Sociology 68.S1 (2017): 181–213.Google Scholar

Brighouse, Harry. “Egalitarianism and Equal Availability of Political Influence.” Journal of Political Philosophy 4.2 (1996): 118–41.Google Scholar

Broockman, David E., and Skovron, Christopher. “Bias in Perceptions of Public Opinion among Political Elites.” American Political Science Review 112.3 (2018): 542–63.Google Scholar

Brubaker, Rogers. “Why Populism?” Theory and Society 46.5 (2017): 357–85.Google Scholar

Brunkhorst, Hauke. Solidarity: From Civic Friendship to a Global Legal Community. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Buchanan, Allen. “Democracy and Secession.” In National Self-Determination and Secession, ed. Moore, Margaret. Oxford: Oxford Scholarship Online, 2003, 14–33. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198293844.001.0001.Google Scholar

Buss, Sarah. “Respect for Persons.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 29.4 (1999): 517–50.Google Scholar

Butler, Judith. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar

Canovan, Margaret. The People. Cambridge: Polity, 2005.Google Scholar

Canovan, Margaret. “Taking Politics to the People: Populism as the Ideology of Democracy.” In Democracies and the Populist Challenge, ed. Mény, Yves and Surel, Yves. New York: Palgrave, 2002, 25–44.Google Scholar

Canovan, Margaret. “Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy.” Political Studies 45.1 (1999): 2–16.Google Scholar

Caramani, Daniele. “Will vs. Reason: The Populist and Technocratic Forms of Political Representation and Their Critique to Party Government.” American Political Science Review 111.1 (2017): 54–67.Google Scholar

Chambers, Simone. “Democracy and Constitutional Reform: Deliberative versus Populist Constitutionalism.” Philosophy & Social Criticism 45.9–10 (2019): 1116–31.Google Scholar

Chambers, Simone. “Democracy, Popular Sovereignty, and Constitutional Legitimacy.” Constellations 11.2 (2004): 153–73.Google Scholar

Chambers, Simone. “How Can the People Rule?” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar

Christiano, Thomas. The Constitution of Equality: Democratic Authority and Its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Christiano, Thomas. “Political Equality.” In Majorities and Minorities: Nomos XXXII, ed. Chapman, John. W. and Wertheimer, Alan. New York: New York University Press, 1990, 151–83.Google Scholar

Christiano, Thomas. The Rule of the Many: Fundamental Issues in Democratic Theory. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Cohen, Jean L. “Populism and the Politics of Resentment.” Jus Cogens 1.1 (2019): 5–39.Google Scholar

Cohen, Jean L. “What’s Wrong with the Normative Theory (and the Actual Practice) of Left Populism.” Constellations 26.3 (2019): 391–407.Google Scholar

Cohen, Jean L., and Arato, Andrew. Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Cohen, Joshua. “Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy.” In Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, ed. Bohman, James and Rehg, William. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997, 67–92.Google Scholar

Cohen, Joshua. “Democracy and Liberty.” In Deliberative Democracy, ed. Elster, Jon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998, 185–231.Google Scholar

Cohen, Joshua. “Procedure and Substance in Deliberative Democracy.” In Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, ed. Bohman, James and Rehg, William. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997, 407–37.Google Scholar

Craiutu, Aurelian. Faces of Moderation: The Art of Balance in an Age of Extremes. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Cramer, Katherine J. The Politics of Resentment: Rural Consciousness in Wisconsin and the Rise of Scott Walker. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Crick, Bernard. “Populism, Politics and Democracy.” Democratization 12.5 (2005): 625–32.Google Scholar

Cruft, Rowan. “On the Non-Instrumental Value of Basic Rights.” Journal of Moral Philosophy 7.4 (2010): 441–61.Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert A. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Darwall, Stephen. “Respect as Honor and as Accountability.” In Honor, History, and Relationship: Essays in Second-Personal Ethics II. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013, 11–29.Google Scholar

Darwall, Stephen. The Second-Person Standpoint: Morality, Respect, and Accountability. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Darwall, Stephen L. “Two Kinds of Respect.” Ethics 88.1 (1977): 36–49.Google Scholar

De la Torre, Carlos. “The Resurgence of Radical Populism in Latin America.” Constellations 14.3 (2007): 384–97.Google Scholar

Dewey, John. “Creative Democracy: The Task before Us.” In The Political Writings, ed. Morris, Debra and Shapiro, Ian. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1993, 240–5.Google Scholar

Dewey, John. The Public and Its Problems. Athens, OH: Swallow Press, 1954.Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald. “Liberalism.” In Public and Private Morality, ed. Hampshire, Stuart. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978, 113–43.Google Scholar

Eatwell, Roger. “Populism and Fascism.” In The Oxford Handbook of Populism, ed. Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira, Taggart, Paul, Espejo, Paulina Ochoa, and Ostiguy, Pierre. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017, 363–83.Google Scholar

Ellis, Elisabeth. Kant’s Politics: Provisional Theory for an Uncertain World. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Elster, Jon. “Some Notes on ‘Populism.’” Philosophy & Social Criticism 46.5 (2020): 591–600.Google Scholar

Eribon, Didier. Returning to Reims. London: Penguin, 2019.Google Scholar

Estlund, David. “Beyond Fairness and Deliberation: The Epistemic Dimension of Democratic Authority.” In Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, ed. Bohman, James and Rehg, William. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997, 173–204.Google Scholar

Estlund, David M. Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Feinberg, Joel. “The Nature and Value of Rights.” Journal of Value Inquiry 4.4 (1970): 243–57.Google Scholar

Finchelstein, Federico. From Fascism to Populism in History. Oakland: University of California Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Forst, Rainer. “The Limits of Toleration.” Constellations 11.3 (2004): 312–25.Google Scholar

Forst, Rainer. The Right to Justification. New York: Columbia University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Forst, Rainer. “‘To Tolerate Means to Insult’: Toleration, Recognition, and Emancipation.” In Recognition and Power: Axel Honneth and the Tradition of Critical Social Theory, ed. van den Brink, Bert and Owen, David. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007, 215–37.Google Scholar

Forst, Rainer. “Two Pictures of Justice.” In Justification and Critique: Towards a Critical Theory of Politics. Oxford: Polity, 2014.Google Scholar

Fourie, Carina. “To Praise and to Scorn: The Problem of Inequalities of Esteem for Social Egalitarianism.” In Social Equality: On What It Means to be Equals, ed. Fourie, Carina, Schuppert, Fabian, and Wallimann-Helmer, Ivo. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015, 87–106.Google Scholar

Fraser, Nancy, and Honneth, Axel, ed. Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange. London: Verso, 2003.Google Scholar

Freeman, Samuel. “The Burdens of Public Justification: Constructivism, Contractualism, and Publicity.” Politics, Philosophy & Economics 6.1 (2007): 5–43.Google Scholar

Fukuyama, Francis. Identity: The Demand for Dignity and the Politics of Resentment. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 2018.Google Scholar

Galeotti, Anna Elisabetta. “Rescuing Toleration.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 24.1 (2021): 87–107.Google Scholar

Galston, William A. Anti-Pluralism: The Populist Threat to Liberal Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Gest, Justin, Reny, Tyler, and Mayer, Jeremy. “Roots of the Radical Right: Nostalgic Deprivation in the United States and Britain.” Comparative Political Studies 51.13 (2018): 1694–1719.Google Scholar

Gidron, Noam, and Hall, Peter A.. “Populism as a Problem of Social Integration.” Comparative Political Studies 53.7 (2020): 1027–59.Google Scholar

Gilens, Martin. Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Gosseries, Axel, and Parr, Tom. “Publicity.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta, 2018. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/publicity/ [accessed April 29, 2019].Google Scholar

Green, Leslie. “Two Worries about Respect for Persons.” Ethics 120.2 (2010): 212–31.Google Scholar

Gutmann, Amy, and Thompson, Dennis. “The Mindsets of Political Compromise.” Perspectives on Politics 8.4 (2010): 1125–43.Google Scholar

Gutmann, Amy, and Thompson, Dennis. The Spirit of Compromise: Why Governing Demands It and Campaigning Undermines It. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Gutmann, Amy, and Thompson, Dennis. Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. Between Facts and Norms. Cambridge: Polity, 1996.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. “Discourse Ethics.” In Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge: Polity, 1990, 43–115.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. “Popular Sovereignty as Procedure.” In Between Facts and Norms. Cambridge: Polity, 1996, 463–90.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. “Reply to Symposium Participants, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law.” In Habermas on Law and Democracy: Critical Exchanges, ed. Rosenfeld, Michael and Arato, Andrew. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998, 381–452.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. “Struggles for Recognition in the Democratic Constitutional State.” In Multiculturalism, ed. Gutmann, Amy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994, 107–48.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. The Theory of Communicative Action: Volume One. Cambridge: Polity, 1984.Google Scholar

Hansen, Mogens Herman. The Athenian Democracy in the Age of Demosthenes: Structure, Principles, and Ideology. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Harris, Cheryl I. “Whiteness as Property.” Harvard Law Review 106.8 (1993): 1707–91.Google Scholar

Hieronymi, Pamela. Freedom, Resentment, and the Metaphysics of Morals. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2020.Google Scholar

Hill, Thomas E., Jnr. Respect, Pluralism, and Justice: Kantian Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Hirvonen, Onni, and Pennanen, Joonas. “Populism as a Pathological Form of Politics of Recognition.” European Journal of Social Theory 22.1 (2019): 27–44.Google Scholar

Hochschild, Arlie Russell. Strangers in Their Own Land: Anger and Mourning on the American Right. New York: New Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Holmes, Stephen. Passions and Constraint: On the Theory of Liberal Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Honneth, Axel. “Redistribution as Recognition: A Response to Nancy Fraser.” In Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange, ed. Fraser, Nancy and Honneth, Axel. London: Verso, 2003, 110–97.Google Scholar

Honneth, Axel. The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Houle, Christian, and Kenny, Paul D.. “The Political and Economic Consequences of Populist Rule in Latin America.” Government and Opposition 53.2 (2018): 256–87.Google Scholar

Horwitz, Robert B. “Trump and the ‘Deep State.’” Policy Studies 42.5–6 (2021): 473–90.Google Scholar

Hussain, Waheed. “Pitting People against Each Other.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 48.1 (2020): 79–113.Google Scholar

Inglehart, Ronald. The Silent Revolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Inglehart, Ronald, and Norris, Pippa. “Trump and the Populist Authoritarian Parties: The Silent Revolution in Reverse.” Perspectives on Politics 15.2 (2017): 443–54.Google Scholar

Iyengar, Shanto, Lelkes, Yphtach, Levendusky, Matthew, Malhotra, Neil, and Westwood, Sean J.. “The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States.” Annual Review of Political Science 22 (2019): 129–46.Google Scholar

Iyengar, Shanto, Sood, Gaurav, and Lelkes, Yphtach. “Affect, Not Ideology: A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76.3 (2012): 405–31.Google Scholar

Jones, Peter. “Equality, Recognition and Difference.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 9.1 (2006): 23–46.Google Scholar

Jones, Peter. “Respecting Beliefs and Rebuking Rushdie.” British Journal of Political Science 20.4 (October 1990): 415–37.Google Scholar

Jones, Peter. Rights. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1994.Google Scholar

Jones, Peter, and O’Flynn, Ian. “Can a Compromise Be Fair?” Politics, Philosophy & Economics 12.2 (2013): 115–35.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. “An Answer to the Question: What Is Enlightenment?.” In Practical Philosophy, ed. Gregor, Mary J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, 15–22.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. “Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals.” In Practical Philosophy, ed. Gregor, Mary J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, 37–108.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. “The Metaphysics of Morals.” In Practical Philosophy, ed. Gregor, Mary J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, 353–603.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. “Toward Perpetual Peace.” In Practical Philosophy, ed. Gregor, Mary J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, 311–52.Google Scholar

Kazin, Michael. The Populist Persuasion: An American History, rev. edn. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans. The Essence and Value of Democracy. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2013.Google Scholar

Knight, Jack, and Johnson, James. “What Sort of Equality Does Deliberative Democracy Require?” In Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, ed. Bohman, James and Rehg, William. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997, 279–319.Google Scholar

Kolers, Avery. A Moral Theory of Solidarity. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Kolodny, Niko. “Rule Over None I: What Justifies Democracy?” Philosophy & Public Affairs 42.3 (2014): 195–229.Google Scholar

Korsgaard, Christine M. Creating the Kingdom of Ends. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Krastev, Ivan. “Majoritarian Futures.” In The Great Regression, ed. Geiselberger, Heinrich. Cambridge: Polity, 2017, 65–77.Google Scholar

Krause, Sharon R. Liberalism with Honor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Kuflik, Arthur. “Morality and Compromise.” In Compromise in Ethics, Law, and Politics: Nomos XXI, ed. James R., Pennock and John W., Chapman. New York: New York University Press, 1979, 38–65.Google Scholar

Kymlicka, Will. Contemporary Political Philosophy, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Laclau, Ernesto. “An Interview with Ernesto Laclau: Questions from David Howarth.” In Ernesto Laclau: Post-Marxism, Populism and Critique, ed. Howarth, David. London: Routledge, 2015, 257–71.Google Scholar

Laclau, Ernesto. On Populist Reason. London: Verso, 2005.Google Scholar

Laclau, Ernesto. “Populism: What Is in a Name?” In Ernesto Laclau: Post-Marxism, Populism and Critique, ed. Howarth, David. London: Routledge, 2015, 152–64.Google Scholar

Laclau, Ernesto, and Mouffe, Chantal. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso, 1985.Google Scholar

Lafont, Cristina. Democracy without Shortcuts: A Participatory Conception of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.Google Scholar

Laitinen, Arto. “From Recognition to Solidarity: Universal Respect, Mutual Support, and Social Unity.” In Solidarity: Theory and Practice, ed. Laitinen, Arto and Pessi, Anne Birgitta. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2014, 126–54.Google Scholar

Laitinen, Arto, and Birgitta Pessi, Anne. “Solidarity: Theory and Practice – an Introduction.” In Solidarity: Theory and Practice, ed. Laitinen, Arto and Pessi, Anne Birgitta. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2014, 1–29.Google Scholar

Lefort, Claude. “Human Rights and the Welfare State.” In Democracy and Political Theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1988, 21–44.Google Scholar

Levitsky, Steven, and Loxton, James. “Populism and Competitive Authoritarianism in Latin America.” In Routledge Handbook of Global Populism, ed. de la Torre, Carlos. London: Routledge, 2018, 334–50.Google Scholar

Levitsky, Steven, and Ziblatt, Daniel. How Democracies Die: What History Reveals about Our Future. New York: Viking, 2018.Google Scholar

Lijphart, Arend. Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Democracy in Twenty-One Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Lister, Andrew. “Public Reason and Moral Compromise.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37.1 (2007): 1–34.Google Scholar

Luban, David. “The Publicity Principle.” In The Theory of Institutional Design, ed. Robert, E. Goodin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, 154–98.Google Scholar

Mair, Peter. “Populist Democracy vs Party Democracy.” In Democracies and the Populist Challenge, ed. Mény, Yves and Surel, Yves. New York: Palgrave, 2002, 81–98.Google Scholar

Manin, Bernard. “On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation.” Political Theory 15.3 (1987): 338–68.Google Scholar

Manin, Bernard. The Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Mansbridge, Jane, and Macedo, Stephen. “Populism and Democratic Theory.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 15 (2019): 59–77.Google Scholar

Mansbridge, Jane, Bohman, James, Chambers, Simone, Estlund, David, Føllesdal, Andreas, Fung, Archon, Lafont, Cristina, Manin, Bernard, and Martí, José Luis. “The Place of Self‐Interest and the Role of Power in Deliberative Democracy.” Journal of Political Philosophy 18.1 (2010): 64–100.Google Scholar

Margalit, Avishai. On Compromise and Rotten Compromises. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Markell, Patchen. Bound by Recognition. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Marx, Karl. “On the Jewish Question.” In The Marx-Engels Reader, ed. Tuck, Richard, 2nd edn. New York: W. W. Norton, 1978, 26–52.Google Scholar

Mason, Andrew. Community, Solidarity and Belonging. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Mason, Lilliana. Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2018.Google Scholar

May, Kenneth O. “A Set of Independent Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Simple Majority Decision.” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 20.4 (1952): 680–4.Google Scholar

May, Simon Căbulea. “Moral Compromise, Civic Friendship, and Political Reconciliation.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14.5 (2011): 581–602.Google Scholar

May, Simon Căbulea. “No Compromise on Racial Equality.” In Compromise and Disagreement in Contemporary Political Theory, ed. Rostbøll, Christian F. and Scavenius, Theresa. New York: Routledge, 2018, 34–49.Google Scholar

May, Simon Căbulea. “Principled Compromise and the Abortion Controversy.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 33.4 (2005): 317–48.Google Scholar

McBride, Cillian. Recognition. Cambridge: Polity, 2013.Google Scholar

McCarty, Nolan. Polarization: What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar

McCormick, John P. Machiavellian Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

McCormick, John P. “Machiavellian Democracy: Controlling Elites with Ferocious Populism.” American Political Science Review 95.2 (2001): 297–313.Google Scholar

McCormick, John P. “The New Ochlophobia? Populism, Majority Rule, and Prospects for Democratic Republicanism.” In Republicanism and the Future of Democracy, ed. Elazar, Yiftah and Rousselière, Geneviève. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019, 130–51.Google Scholar

McCoy, Jennifer, Rahman, Tahmina, and Somer, Murat. “Polarization and the Global Crisis of Democracy.” American Behavioral Scientist 62.2 (2018): 16–42.Google Scholar

McKean, Benjamin L. “Toward an Inclusive Populism? On the Role of Race and Difference in Laclau’s Politics.” Political Theory 44.6 (2016): 797–820.Google Scholar

Mény, Yves, and Surel, Yves. “The Constitutive Ambiguity of Populism.” In Democracies and the Populist Challenge, ed. Mény, Yves and Surel, Yves. New York: Palgrave, 2002, 1–21.Google Scholar

Mény, Yves, and Surel, Yves. Par le people, pour le people: Le populisme et les démocraties. Paris: Fayard, 2000.Google Scholar

Michelman, Frank. “Justification (and Justifiability) of Law in a Contradictory World.” Justification: Nomos XXVIII, ed. Pennock, J. Ronald and Chapman, John W.. New York: New York University Press, 1986, 71–99.Google Scholar

Mill, John Stuart. Considerations on Representative Government. In On Liberty and Other Essays, ed. Gray, John. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998, 203–467.Google Scholar

Mill, John Stuart. On Liberty. In On Liberty and Other Writings. Edited by Collini, Stefan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989, 1–115.Google Scholar

Miller, David. On Nationality. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Moffitt, Benjamin. The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style, and Representation. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Montesquieu, Charles-Louis de Secondat. The Spirit of the Laws. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Moody-Adams, Michelle M. “Democratic Conflict and the Political Morality of Compromise.” In Compromise: NOMOS LIX, ed. Knight, Jack. New York: New York University Press, 2018, 186–219.Google Scholar

Moore, Barrington. Injustice: The Social Bases of Obedience and Revolt. White Plains, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 1978.Google Scholar

Mouffe, Chantal. The Democratic Paradox. London: Verso, 2009.Google Scholar

Mouffe, Chantal. For a Left Populism. London: Verso, 2018.Google Scholar

Mounk, Yascha. The People vs. Democracy: Why Our Freedom Is in Danger and How to Save It. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Mudde, Cas. The Far Right Today. Cambridge: Polity, 2019.Google Scholar

Mudde, Cas. “Populism: An Ideational Approach.” In The Oxford Handbook of Populism, ed. Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira, Taggart, Paul, Espejo, Paulina Ochoa, and Ostiguy, Pierre. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017, 27–47.Google Scholar

Mudde, Cas. Populist Radical Rights Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Mudde, Cas. “The Populist Zeitgeist.” Government and Opposition 39.4 (2004): 541–63.Google Scholar

Mudde, Cas. “Three Decades of Populist Radical Right Parties in Western Europe: So What?” European Journal of Political Research 52.1 (2013): 1–19.Google Scholar

Mudde, Cas, and Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira. “Populism.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies, ed. Freeden, Michael, Sargent, Lyman Tower, and Stears, Marc. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013, 493–512.Google Scholar

Mudde, Cas, and Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira. Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Mudde, Cas, and Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira. “Populism: Corrective and Threat to Democracy.” In Populism in Europe and Americas: Threat or Corrective for Democracy?, ed. Mudde, Cas and Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012, 205–22.Google Scholar

Muirhead, Russell. The Promise of Party in a Polarized Age. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Muirhead, Russell, and Rosenblum, Nancy L.. “Political Liberalism vs. ‘The Great Game of Politics’: The Politics of Political Liberalism.” Perspectives on Politics 4.1 (2006): 99–108.Google Scholar

Müller, Jan-Werner. “Capitalism in One Family.” London Review of Books 38.23 (2016): 10–14. www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v38/n23/jan-werner-mueller/capitalism-in-one-family [accessed September 30, 2020].Google Scholar

Müller, Jan-Werner. Democracy Rules. London: Allen Lane, 2021.Google Scholar

Müller, Jan-Werner. “The People Must Be Extracted from within the People: Reflections on Populism.” Constellations 21.4 (2014): 483–93.Google Scholar

Müller, Jan-Werner. “Populism and Constitutionalism.” In The Oxford Handbook of Populism, ed. Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira, Taggart, Paul, Espejo, Paulina Ochoa, and Ostiguy, Pierre. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017, 590–606.Google Scholar

Müller, Jan-Werner. What Is Populism? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Mutz, Diana C. “Status Threat, Not Economic Hardship, Explains the 2016 Presidential Vote.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115.19 (2018): E4330–9.Google Scholar

Nagel, Thomas. “Agent-Relativity and Deontology.” In Deontology, ed. Darwall, Stephen. Malden: Blackwell, 2003, 90–111.Google Scholar

Näsström, Sofia. The Spirit of Democracy: Corruption, Disintegration, Renewal. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.Google Scholar

Ochoa Espejo, Paulina. “Power to Whom? The People between Procedure and Populism.” In The Promise and Perils of Populism, ed. de la Torre, Carlos. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 2015, 59–90.Google Scholar

Offe, Claus. “‘Homogeneity’ and Constitutional Democracy: Coping with Identity Through Group Rights.” Journal of Philosophy 6.2 (1998): 113–41.Google Scholar

Olson, Joel. “Whiteness and the Polarization of American Politics.” Political Research Quarterly 61.4 (2008): 704–18.Google Scholar

O’Neill, Martin. “Philosophy and Public Policy after Piketty.” Journal of Political Philosophy 25.3 (2017): 343–75.Google Scholar

O’Neill, Onora. “Abstraction, Idealization and Ideology in Ethics.” In Moral Philosophy and Contemporary Problems, ed. Evans, J. D. G.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987, 55–69.Google Scholar

O’Neill, Onora. Acting on Principle: An Essay on Kantian Ethics, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

O’Neill, Onora. Constructions of Reason: Explorations of Kant’s Practical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

O’Neill, Onora. “Enlightenment as Autonomy: Kant’s Vindication of Reason.” In The Enlightenment and Its Shadows, ed. Hulme, Peter and Jordanova, Ludmilla J.. London: Routledge, 1990, 184–99.Google Scholar

Pappas, Takis S. Populism and Liberal Democracy: A Comparative and Theoretical Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Patten, Alan. “Populist Multiculturalism: Are There Majority Cultural Rights?” Philosophy & Social Criticism 46.5 (2020): 539–52.Google Scholar

Pettit, Philip. On the People’s Terms: A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Pettit, Philip. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Pitkin, Hanna. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Przeworski, Adam. Crises of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Rawls, John. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Rawls, John. Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Rawls, John. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice, rev. edn. Cambridge, MA: Belknap, 1999.Google Scholar

Richardson, Henry S. Democratic Autonomy: Public Reasoning about the Ends of Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Richardson, Henry S. “Noncognitivist Trumpism: Partisanship and Political Reasoning.” Journal of Social Philosophy 50.4 (2019): 642–63.Google Scholar

Riker, William. Liberalism against Populism. Prospect Heights: Waveland Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Roberts, Kenneth M. “Populism and Democracy in Venezuela under Hugo Chavez.” In Populism in Europe and Americas: Threat or Corrective for Democracy?, ed. Mudde, Cas and Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012, 136–59.Google Scholar

Roberts, Kenneth M. “Populism and Polarization in Comparative Perspective: Constitutive, Spatial and Institutional Dimensions.” Government and Opposition (2021): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2021.14.Google Scholar

Rosanvallon, Pierre. Democratic Legitimacy: Impartiality, Reflexivity, Proximity. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Rosanvallon, Pierre. Le siècle du populisme: Histoire, théorie, critique. Paris: Seuil, 2020.Google Scholar

Rosenblum, Nancy L. On the Side of the Angels: An Appreciation of Parties and Partisanship. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Rossi, Enzo. “Consensus, Compromise, Justice, and Legitimacy.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16.4 (2013): 557–72.Google Scholar

Rostbøll, Christian F. “Autonomy, Respect, and Arrogance in the Danish Cartoon Controversy.” Political Theory 37.5 (2009): 623–48.Google Scholar

Rostbøll, Christian F. “Compromise and Toleration: Responding to Disagreement.” In Compromise and Disagreement in Contemporary Political Theory, ed. Rostbøll, Christian F. and Scavenius, Theresa. New York: Routledge, 2018, 17–33.Google Scholar

Rostbøll, Christian F. Deliberative Freedom: Deliberative Democracy as Critical Theory. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Rostbøll, Christian F. “Democracy as Good in Itself: Three Kinds of Non-Instrumental Justification.” In Constitutionalism Justified: Rainer Forst in Discourse, ed. Herlin-Karnell, Ester and Klatt, Matthias. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020, 235–63.Google Scholar

Rostbøll, Christian F. “Democratic Respect and Compromise.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 20.5 (2017): 619–35.Google Scholar

Rostbøll, Christian F. “Dissent, Criticism, and Transformative Political Action in Deliberative Democracy.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 12.1 (2009): 19–36.Google Scholar

Rostbøll, Christian F. “Freedom of Expression, Deliberation, Autonomy, and Respect.” European Journal of Political Theory 10.1 (2011): 5–21.Google Scholar

Rostbøll, Christian F. Immanuel Kant. Copenhagen: Jurist- og Økonomforbundets Forlag, 2015.Google Scholar

Rostbøll, Christian F. “Impartiality, Deliberation, and Multiculturalism.” Paper presented at “What’s the Culture in Multiculturalism? What’s the Difference of Identities?” (conference), University of Aarhus, Denmark, May 22–4, 2003.Google Scholar

Rostbøll, Christian F. Jürgen Habermas. Copenhagen: Jurist- og Økonomforbundets Forlag, 2011.Google Scholar

Rostbøll, Christian F. “Kant and the Critique of the Ethics-First Approach to Politics,” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 22.1 (2019): 55–70.Google Scholar

Rostbøll, Christian F. “Kant, Freedom as Independence, and Democracy.” Journal of Politics 78.3 (2016): 792–805.Google Scholar

Rostbøll, Christian F. “Kantian Autonomy and Political Liberalism.” Social Theory and Practice 37.3 (2011): 341–64.Google Scholar

Rostbøll, Christian F. “Non-Domination and Democratic Legitimacy.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 18.4 (2015): 424–39.Google Scholar

Rostbøll, Christian F. “The Non‐Instrumental Value of Democracy: The Freedom Argument.” Constellations 22.2 (2015): 267–78.Google Scholar

Rostbøll, Christian F. “Populism and Two Kinds of Polarization.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar

Rostbøll, Christian F. “Populism, Democracy, and the Publicity Requirement.” Constellations (2022): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12625.Google Scholar

Rostbøll, Christian F. “Second-Order Political Thinking: Compromise versus Populism.” Political Studies 69.3 (2021): 559–76.Google Scholar

Rostbøll, Christian F. “The Use and Abuse of ‘Universal Values’ in the Danish Cartoon Controversy.” European Political Science Review 2.3 (2010): 401–22.Google Scholar

Rostbøll, Christian F., and Scavenius, Theresa. “Introduction.” In Compromise and Disagreement in Contemporary Political Theory, ed. Rostbøll, Christian F. and Scavenius, Theresa. New York: Routledge, 2018, 1–14.Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. On the Social Contract. In The Basic Political Writings. Translated and edited by Donald A. Cress. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1987, 141–227.Google Scholar

Rovira Kaltwasser, Cristóbal. “The Ambivalence of Populism: Threat and Corrective for Democracy.” Democratization 19.2 (2012): 184–208.Google Scholar

Rozenberg, Joshua. Enemies of the People? How Judges Shape Society. Bristol: Bristol University Press, 2020.Google Scholar

Rummens, Stefan. “Populism as a Threat to Liberal Democracy.” In The Oxford Handbook of Populism, ed. Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira, Taggart, Paul, Espejo, Paulina Ochoa, and Ostiguy, Pierre. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017, 554–70.Google Scholar

Rummens, Stefan. “Staging Deliberation: The Role of Representative Institutions in the Deliberative Democratic Process.” Journal of Political Philosophy 20.1 (2012): 23–44.Google Scholar

Runciman, Walter Garrison. “‘Social’ Equality.” Philosophical Quarterly 17.68 (1967): 221–30.Google Scholar

Ruser, Alexander, and Machin, Amanda. Against Political Compromise: Sustaining Democratic Debate. London: Routledge, 2017.Google Scholar

Sabl, Andrew. “The Two Cultures of Democratic Theory: Responsiveness, Democratic Quality, and the Empirical-Normative Divide.” Perspectives on Politics 13.2 (2015): 345–65.Google Scholar

Sandel, Michael. The Tyranny of Merit: What’s Become of the Common Good? New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 2020.Google Scholar

Sangiovanni, Andrea. “Solidarity as Joint Action.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 32.4 (2015): 340–59.Google Scholar

Sartori, Giovanni. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Colchester: ECPR Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Scanlon, T. M. “The Difficulty of Tolerance.” In The Difficulty of Tolerance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003, 187–201.Google Scholar

Scanlon, T. M. What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Schedler, Andreas. “Democratic Reciprocity.” Journal of Political Philosophy 29.2 (2021): 252–78.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl. The Concept of the Political. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl. The Crises of Parliamentary Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Schmitter, Philippe C., and Karl, Terry Lynn. “What Democracy Is … and Is Not.” Journal of Democracy 2.3 (1991): 75–88.Google Scholar

Schneewind, J. B. “Autonomy, Obligation, and Virtue: An Overview of Kant’s Moral Philosophy.” In The Cambridge Companion to Kant, ed. Guyer, Paul. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992, 309–41.Google Scholar

Schwartzberg, Melissa. Counting the Many: The Origins and Limits of Supermajority Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Schwarze, Michelle. Recognizing Resentment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.Google Scholar

Sennett, Richard. “Even If Donald Trump Loses the Election, the US Isn’t Going to Heal Anytime Soon.” The Guardian, November 2, 2020. www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/nov/02/donald-trump-us-election-base-extreme [accessed November 19, 2020].Google Scholar

Sennett, Richard. Respect in a World of Inequality. New York: W. W. Norton, 2003.Google Scholar

Sennett, Richard, and Cobb, Jonathan. The Hidden Injuries of Class. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972.Google Scholar

Shapiro, Ian. Politics against Domination. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Shapiro, Ian. The State of Democratic Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Sindberg, Mathias. “Kendt sociolog: Black Lives Matter-demonstrationerne kan give Trump fire år mere i Det Hvide Hus.” Information, June 25, 2020. www.information.dk/udland/2020/06/kendt-sociolog-black-lives-matter-demonstrationerne-kan-give-trump-fire-aar-mere-hvide-hus [accessed June 26, 2020].Google Scholar

Smith, Rogers M., and King, Desmond. “White Protectionism in America.” Perspectives on Politics 19.2 (2021): 460–78.Google Scholar

Spruyt, Bram, Keppens, Gil, and Van Droogenbroeck, Filip. “Who Supports Populism and What Attracts People to It?” Political Research Quarterly 69.2 (2016): 335–46.Google Scholar

Stavrakakis, Yannis. “Populism and Hegemony.” In The Oxford Handbook of Populism, ed. Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira, Taggart, Paul, Espejo, Paulina Ochoa, and Ostiguy, Pierre. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017, 535–53.Google Scholar

Stavrakakis, Yannis. “Populism in Power: Syriza’s Challenge to Europe.” Juncture 21.4 (2015): 273–80Google Scholar

Strawson, Peter F. “Freedom and Resentment.” In Free Will, ed. Watson, Gary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982, 59–80.Google Scholar

Taggart, Paul. “Populism and the Pathology of Representative Politics.” In Democracies and the Populist Challenge, ed. Mény, Yves and Surel, Yves. New York: Palgrave, 2002, 62–80.Google Scholar

Taylor, Charles. “The Politics of Recognition.” In Multiculturalism, ed. Gutmann, Amy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994, 25–74.Google Scholar

Thompson, Edward P. The Making of the English Working Class. London: Gollancz, 1963.Google Scholar

Thucydides. History of the Peloponnesian War. London: Penguin, 1972.Google Scholar

Tocqueville, Alexis de. Democracy in America. New York: Harper Perennial, 1988.Google Scholar

Urbinati, Nadia. Democracy Disfigured. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Urbinati, Nadia. Me the People: How Populism Transforms Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Urbinati, Nadia. “Political Theory of Populism.” Annual Review of Political Science 22 (2019): 111–27.Google Scholar

Urbinati, Nadia. “Populism and the Principle of Majority.” In The Oxford Handbook of Populism, ed. Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira, Taggart, Paul, Espejo, Paulina Ochoa, and Ostiguy, Pierre. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017, 571–89.Google Scholar

Valdivielso, Joaquín. “The Outraged People: Laclau, Mouffe and the Podemos Hypothesis.” Constellations 24.3 (2017): 296–309.Google Scholar

Valentini, Laura. “Justice, Disagreement and Democracy.” British Journal of Political Science 43.1 (2013): 177–99.Google Scholar

Vlastos, Gregory. “Justice and Equality.” In Theories of Rights, ed. Waldron, Jeremy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984, 41–76.Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy. “Cultural Identity and Civic Responsibility.” In Citizenship in Diverse Societies, ed. Kymlicka, Will and Norman, Wayne. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000, 155–74.Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy. “Dignity and Rank.” In Dignity, Rank, and Rights, ed. Dan-Cohen, Meir. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012, 13–46.Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy. The Dignity of Legislation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy. Law and Disagreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy. “Law, Dignity, and Self-Control.” In Dignity, Rank, and Rights ed. Dan-Cohen, Meir. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012, 47–70.Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy. “A Right to Do Wrong.” Ethics 92.1 (1981): 21–39.Google Scholar

Wall, Steven. “Rooted Reciprocity.” Journal of Moral Philosophy 16.4 (2019): 463–85.Google Scholar

Watson, Gary. “Responsibility and the Limits of Evil: Variations on a Strawsonian Theme.” In Free Will and Reactive Attitudes: Perspectives on P. F. Strawson’s “Freedom and Resentment,” ed. McKenaa, Michael and Russell, Paul. London: Routledge, 2008, 115–41.Google Scholar

Weale, Albert. The Will of the People: A Modern Myth. Cambridge: Polity, 2018.Google Scholar

Weinstock, Daniel M. “Compromise, Pluralism, and Deliberation.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 20.5 (2017): 636–55.Google Scholar

Weinstock, Daniel M. “The Ethics of Compromise.” In Compromise and Disagreement in Contemporary Political Theory, ed. Rostbøll, Christian F. and Scavenius, Theresa. New York: Routledge, 2018, 65–78.Google Scholar

Weinstock, Daniel M. “On the Possibility of Principled Moral Compromise.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16.4 (2013): 537–56.Google Scholar

Wenar, Leif. “Rights.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta, 2021. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2021/entries/rights/ [accessed March 30, 2021].Google Scholar

Wendt, Fabian. Compromise, Peace and Public Justification: Political Morality Beyond Justice. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.Google Scholar

Weyland, Kurt. “Populism: A Political-Strategic Approach.” In The Oxford Handbook of Populism, ed. Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira, Taggart, Paul, Espejo, Paulina Ochoa, and Ostiguy, Pierre. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017, 48–72.Google Scholar

Weyland, Kurt. “Populism and Authoritarianism.” In Routledge Handbook of Global Populism, ed. de la Torre, Carlos. London: Routledge, 2018, 319–33.Google Scholar

Weyland, Kurt. “Populism as a Political Strategy: An Approach’s Enduring – and Increasing – Advantages.” Political Studies 69.2 (2021): 185–9.Google Scholar

White, Jonathan, and Ypi, Lea. The Meaning of Partisanship. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Wikipedia contributors. “Enemies of the People (Headline).” Wikipedia, February 17, 2022. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enemies_of_the_People_(headline) [accessed March 7, 2022].Google Scholar

Williams, Bernard. “Persons, Character and Morality.” In Moral Luck. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981, 1–19.Google Scholar

Williams, Zoe. “Nigel Farage’s Victory Speech Was a Triumph of Poor Taste and Ugliness.” The Guardian, June 24, 2016. www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jun/24/nigel-farage-ugliness-bullet-fired [accessed April 30, 2020].Google Scholar

Wind, Marlene. The Tribalization of Europe: A Defence of Our Liberal Values. Cambridge: Polity, 2020.Google Scholar

Wolkenstein, Fabio. “What Can We Hold against Populism?” Philosophy & Social Criticism 41.2 (2015): 111–29.Google Scholar

Wuthnow, Robert. The Left Behind. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Young, Iris Marion. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Young, Iris Marion. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Zakaria, Fareed. The Future of Freedom: Illiberal Democracy at Home and Abroad. New York: W. W. Norton, 2003.Google Scholar

Žižek, Slavoj. “Against the Populist Temptation.” Critical Inquiry 32.3 (2006): 551–74.Google Scholar

Zurn, Christopher F. “Populism, Polarization, and Misrecognition.” In The Theory and Practice of Recognition, ed. Hirvonen, Onni and Heikki J., Koskinen. London: Routledge, 2022, 131–49.Google Scholar

Zylberman, Ariel. “Why Human Rights? Because of You.” Journal of Political Philosophy 24.3 (2016): 321–43.Google Scholar