Ackerman, Bruce A. and Fishkin, James S.. 2004. Deliberation Day. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Adams, Henry, Wright, Lester, and Lohr, Bethany. 1996. “Is Homophobia Associated with Homosexual Arousal?” Journal of Abnormal Psychology 105 (3): 440–445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Alexander, Michelle. 2012. The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness. New York: Perseus Distribution.Google Scholar

Alston, Macky. 2012. Love Free or Die. DVD. New York: Kino Lorber Inc.Google Scholar

Amaechi, John and Bull, Chris. 2007. Man in the Middle. New York: ESPN Books.Google Scholar

Anzaldúa, Gloria, E. and Keating, AnaLouise. 2000. Interviews – Entrevistas. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Apostolidis, Paul. 2000. Stations of the Cross: Adorno and Christian Right Radio. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Banaji, Mahzarin, R. and Greenwald, Anthony G.. 2013. Blind Spot: Hidden Biases of Good People. New York: Delacorte Press.Google Scholar

Barabási, Albert-László. 2002. Linked: The New Science of Networks. Cambridge: Perseus Publishers.Google Scholar

Bargh, John A. and Chartrand, Tanya L.. 1999. “The Unbearable Automaticity of Being.” American Psychologist 54 (7): 462–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartels, Larry M. 2008. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Barth, Fredrik, ed. 1969. Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company.Google Scholar

Barvosa, Edwina. 2015. “Mapping Public Ambivalence in the Public Engagement with Science: Implications for Democratizing the Governance of Fracking Technologies in the USA,” Journal of Environmental Sciences and Studies, 5 (4): 497–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barvosa, Edwina. 2014. “Unconscious Bias in the Suppression Policing of Black and Latino Men and Boys: Neuroscience, Borderlands Theory, and the Policymaking Quest for Just Policing,” Politics, Groups, and Identities 2 (2): 260–283.Google Scholar

Barvosa, Edwina. 2011. “Inner Contradiction to Immigration Quagmire: A Response to Rogers Smith.” Perspectives on Politics 9 (3): 559–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barvosa, Edwina. 2011a. “Mestiza Consciousness in Relation to Sustained Political Solidarity: A Chicana Feminist Interpretation of the Farmworker Movement.” Aztlán: A Journal of Chicano Studies 36 (2): 121–154.Google Scholar

Barvosa, Edwina. 2008. Wealth of Selves: Multiple Identities, Mestiza Consciousness, and the Subject of Politics. College Station: Texas A & M University Press.Google Scholar

Bauer, M. W., ed. 2014. “Special Issue: Public Engagement in Science.” Public Understanding of Science 23 (1): 1–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baumeister, Roy, F., ed. 1999. The Self in Social Psychology. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Bazerman, Max, H. and Ann Tenbrunsel, E. 2011. Blind Spots: Why We Fail To Do What’s Right and What to Do About It. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Behrens, J. T. and Smith, M. L.. 1996. “Data and Data Analysis,” in Handbook of Educational Psychology, Berliner, D. C. and Calfee, R. C., eds. New York: Macmillan, 949–989.Google Scholar

Behrens, John T. and Rowe, Wayne. 1997. “Measuring White Racial Identity: A Reply to Helms.” Journal of Counseling Psychology 44 (1): 17–19.Google Scholar

Beltrán, Cristina. 2010. The Trouble with Unity: Latino Politics and the Creation of Identity. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Benford, Robert D. and Snow, David A.. 2000. “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment.” Annual Review of Sociology, 26: 611–639.Google Scholar

Benhabib, Seyla. 2002. The Claims of Culture: Equality and Diversity in the Global Era. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benhabib, Seyla. 1996. “Toward a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy,” in Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, Benhabib, Seyla, ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 67–94.Google Scholar

Berger, Ben. 2011. Attention Deficit Democracy: The Paradox of Civic Engagement. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Berkowitz, Bill. 2001. “Studying the Outcomes of Community-Based Coalitions.” American Journal of Community Psychology 29 (2): 213–227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bessette, Joseph M. 1994. The Mild Voice of Reason: Deliberative Democracy and American National Government. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Bessette, Joseph M. 1978. “Deliberation in Congress a Preliminary Investigation.” Ph.D. Diss. University of Chicago.Google Scholar

Bevir, Mark. 2010. Democratic Governance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Blee, Kathleen M., and Creasap, Kimberly A.. 2010. “Conservative and Right-Wing Movements.” Annual Review of Sociology 36: 269–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bronski, Michael. 2011. A Queer History of the United States. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Brown, Mark B. 2009. Science in Democracy: Expertise, Institutions, and Representation. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Burack, Cynthia. 2008. Sin, Sex, and Democracy: Antigay Rhetoric and the Christian Right. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Butler, Catherine, Parkhill, Karen, and Nicholas Pidgeon, F. 2013. Deliberating Energy Transitions in the UK—Transforming the UK Energy System: Public Values, Attitudes and Acceptability. London: UKERC.Google Scholar

Butler, C, Demski, C., Pidgeon, N., Parkhill, K., and Spence, A.. 2014. “Public Values for Energy Futures: Framing, Indeterminacy and Policy Making.” Working Paper London: UK Energy Research Centre.Google Scholar

Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Butler, Judith. 1993. Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex.” New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Carter, Rita. 2008. Multiplicity: The New Science of Personality, Identity, and the Self. New York: Little, Brown & Co.Google Scholar

Cavalier, Robert ed. 2011. Approaching Deliberative Democracy: Theory and Practice. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon University Press.Google Scholar

Castells, Manuel. 2015. Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. 2nd edition. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar

Castells, Manuel. 2012. Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar

Castells, Manuel. 1998. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture – End of Millennium. Vol. 3. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Castells, Manuel. 1997. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture – The Power of Identity. Vol. 2. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Castells, Manuel. 1996. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture – The Rise of the Network Society. Vol. 1. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Chambers, Simone. 2003. “Deliberative Democratic Theory.” Annual Review of Political Science 6 (1): 307–326.Google Scholar

Charmaz, Kathy. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Clark, Susan and Teachout, Woden. 2012. Slow Democracy: Rediscovering Community, Bringing Decision Making Back Home. White River Junction: Chelsea Green Publishing.Google Scholar

Cohen, Anthony, P. 1985. The Symbolic Construction of Community. Chichester: Ellis Horwood Limited.Google Scholar

Cole, Kathleen, D. 2013. “Thinking Through Race: Social Construction, Social Cognition, and the Unconscious Maintenance of Racial Hierarchy.” Ph.D., Political Science, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar

Coleman, Stephen and Blumler, Jay G.. 2009. The Internet and Democratic Citizenship: Theory, Practice and Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cooley, Charles Horton. 1909. Social Organization. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar

Cramer, Duncan. 2003. Advanced Quantitative Data Analysis. Maidenhead, Berkshire, England: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Currah, Paisley, Juang, Richard M., and Minter, Shannon. 2006. Transgender Rights. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert, A. 2002. How Democratic is the American Constitution? New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Dahlgren, Peter. 2009. Media and Political Engagement: Citizens, Communication, and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Davies, Gail. 2006. “The Sacred and the Profane: Biotechnology, Rationality, and Public Debate.” Environment & Planning A. 38 (3): 423–443.Google Scholar

DeGeneres, Ellen. 2011. Seriously … I’m Kidding. New York: Grand Central Publishing.Google Scholar

DeLeon, Peter. 1997. Democracy and the Policy Sciences. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Delgado, Ana, Kjølberg, Kamilla Lein, and Wickson, Fern. 2011. “Public Engagement Coming of Age: From Theory to Practice in STS Encounters with Nanotechnology.” Public Understanding of Science 20 (6): 826–845.Google Scholar

Demski, Christina, Spence, Alexa, and Pidgeon, Nicholas F.. 2013. Summary Findings of a Survey Conducted in August 2012—Transforming the UK Energy System: Public Values, Attitudes and Acceptability. London: UK Energy Research Centre.Google Scholar

Denison, Erik and Kitchen, Alistair. 2015. Out On The Fields: The First International Study On Homophobia in Sports. Sydney: Bingham Cup Sydney 2014.Google Scholar

Dias, Brian, G. and Ressler, Kerry J.. 2013. “Parental Olfactory Experience Influences Behavior and Neural Structure in Subsequent Generations.” Nature Neuroscience 17 (1): 89–98.Google Scholar

Dietz, Thomas. 2013. “Bringing Values and Deliberation to Science Communication.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 110 (3): 14081–14087.Google Scholar

Dietz, Thomas, and Stern, Paul C.. 2008. Public Participation in Environmental Assessment and Decision Making. Washington DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar

Doidge, Norman. 2007. The Brain That Changes Itself: Stories of Personal Triumph from the Frontiers of Brain Science. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Dryzek, John, S. 2007. “Theory, Evidence, and the Tasks of Deliberation,” in Can The People Govern? Deliberation, Participation and Democracy, Rosenberg, Shawn, ed., Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillian, 237–250.Google Scholar

Dryzek, John, S., 2001. “Legitimacy and Economy in Deliberative Democracy,” Political Theory 29 (5): 651–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dryzek, John, S., 2000. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dryzek, John, S., 1990. Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy and Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dryzek, John, S., Honig, Bonnie, and Phillips, Anne. 2009. “Overview of Political Theory,” in The Oxford Handbook of Political Science, Goodin, Robert E., ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 61–88.Google Scholar

Dryzek, John S. and Niemeyer, Simon. 2010. Foundations and Frontiers of Deliberative Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Elledge, Jim. 2010. Queers in American Popular Culture. Vol. 1. Film and Television. Santa Barbara: Praeger.Google Scholar

Elledge, Jim. 2010a. Queers in American Popular Culture. Vol. 2. Literature, Pop Art, and Performance. Santa Barbara: Praeger.Google Scholar

Elledge, Jim. 2010b. Queers in American Popular Culture. Vol. 3. Sports, Leisure, and Lifestyle. Santa Barbara: Praeger.Google Scholar

Erikson, Kai. 1994. A New Species of Trouble: Explorations in Disaster, Trauma, and Community. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar

Erikson, Kai. 1994a. “Hiroshima: Of Accidental Judgments and Casual Slaughters,” in A New Species of Trouble: the Human Experience of Modern Disasters. New York: W.W. Norton & Co., 185–202.Google Scholar

Jr.Eskridge, William N. 2008. Dishonorable Passions: Sodomy Laws in America, 1861–2003. New York: Viking.Google Scholar

Evans, Jonathan, St., B.T. 2008. “Dual-Processing Accounts of Reasoning, Judgment, and Social Cognition.” The Annual Review of Psychology 59: 255–278.Google Scholar

Evans, Jonathan, St., B.T., and Keith Stanovich, E. 2013. “Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition: Advancing the Debate.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 8 (3): 223–241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fiorino, Daniel J. 1990. “Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional Mechanisms.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 15 (2): 226–243.Google Scholar

Fishkin, James, S. 1995. The Voice of the People: Public Opinion and Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Forester, John. 1999. The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. 1979. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. 1990. The History of Sexuality: An Introduction. Translated by Hurley, Robert. Vol. 1. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar

Frank, Barney, 2015. Frank: A Life in Politics from the Great Society to Same-Sex Marriage. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar

Friedkin, Noah. 1998. A Structural Theory of Social Influence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fung, Arjun. 2006. “Democratizing the Policy Process,” in The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, Moran, Michael, Rein, Martin, and Goodin, Robert E., eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gastil, John. 2000. By Popular Demand Revitalizing Representative Democracy Through Deliberative Elections. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Gergen, Kenneth, J. 2009. Relational Being: Beyond Self and Community. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gergen, Kenneth, J. 1999. An Invitation to Social Construction. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Gerring, John. 2007. Case Study Research: Principles and Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gerstmann, Evan. 2008. Same-Sex Marriage and the Constitution. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gibney, Alex, 2005. Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room. DVD. Los Angeles: Magnolia Home Entertainment.Google Scholar

Gifford, Robert. 2015. “The Road to Climate Hell.” New Scientist 227 (3029): 28–33.Google Scholar

Gladwell, Malcolm. 2008. Outliers: The Story of Success. New York: Little, Brown & Co.Google Scholar

Gladwell, Malcolm. 2000. The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Glaser, Barney G. 1992. Emergence vs Forcing: Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis. Mill Valley: Sociology Press.Google Scholar

Glaser, Barney G., and Strauss, Anselm L.. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing. Co.Google Scholar

Goodin, Robert, E. 2008. Innovating Democracy: Democratic Theory and Practice After the Deliberative Turn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Goodin, Robert, E. 2003. Reflective Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gould, Deborah. 2009. Moving Politics: Emotion and ACT UP’s Fight Against AIDS. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Granovetter, Mark. 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology, 87 (6): 1360–1380.Google Scholar

Gregory, R., Satterfield, T., and Hasell, A.. 2016. “Using Decision Pathway Surveys to Inform Climate Engineering Policy Choices,” PNAS 113 (3): 560–565.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Greenwood, Peter W. 2014. Evidence-Based Practice in Juvenile Justice: Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities. New York: Springer Briefs in Criminology.Google Scholar

Griswold del Castillo, Richard and García, Richard. 2008. “Co-leadership: The Strength of Dolores Huerta,” in A Dolores Huerta Reader, García, Mario T., ed. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 23–37.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. 1993. “Further Reflections on the Public Sphere,” in Habermas and the Public Sphere, Calhoun, Craig, ed. Cambridge: MIT Press, 421–461.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. 1993a. “Concluding Remarks,” in Habermas and the Public Sphere, Calhoun, Craig, ed. Cambridge: MIT Press, 462–479.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. 1992. “The Unity of Reason in the Diversity of Its Voices,” in Postmetaphysical Thinking, Philosophical Essays, trans. Hohengarten, William Mark. Cambridge: MIT Press, 115–148.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. 1990. “The Critique of Reason as an Unmasking of the Human Sciences: Michel Foucault,” in The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures, trans. Lawrence, Frederick G.. Cambridge: MIT Press, 238–265.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. 1990a. “Some Questions Concerning the Theory of Power: Foucault Again,” in The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures, trans. Lawrence, Frederick G.. Cambridge: MIT Press, 266–293.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. 1990b. “An Alternative Way Out of the Philosophy of the Subject: Communicative versus Subject-Centered Reason,” in The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures, trans. Lawrence, Frederick G.. Cambridge: MIT Press, 294–326.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. 1990c. “The Normative Content of Modernity,” in The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures, trans. Lawrence, Frederick G.. Cambridge: MIT Press, 337–367.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. 1990d. “Discourse Ethics: Notes on a Program of Philosophical Justification,” in The Communicative Ethics Controversy, Benhabib, Seyla and Dallmayr, Fred, eds. Boston: The MIT Press, 60–110.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society, trans. Burger, Thomas. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. 1989a. “Towards a Communication-Concept of Rational Collective-Will Formation. A Thought Experiment.” Ratio Juris 2 (2): 144–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action, trans. McCarthy, Thomas. Vol. 1. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. 1984a. The Theory of Communicative Action, trans. McCarthy, Thomas. Vol. 2. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. 1979. Communication and the Evolution of Society, trans. McCarthy, Thomas. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen et al. 2010. An Awareness of What is Missing: Faith and Reason in a Post-Secular Age. Cronin, Ciaran, trans. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Hacker, Jacob S. and Pierson, Paul. 2010. Winner-Take-All Politics: How Washington Made the Rich Richer and Turned its Back on the Middle Class. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Hagendijk, Rob and Irwin, Alan. 2006. “Public Deliberation and Governance: Engaging with Science and Technology in Contemporary Europe.” Minerva, 44 (2): 167–184.Google Scholar

Hajer, Maarten A. and Wagenaar, H.. 2003. Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hamilton, David, L., ed. 2005. Social Cognition: Key Readings. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Hammerback, John C., and Jensen, Richard J.. 1998. The Rhetorical Career of César Chávez. College Station: Texas A & M University Press.Google Scholar

Harthorn, B., Shearer, Herr, C., and Rogers, J.. 2011. “Exploring Ambivalence: Techno-Enthusiasm and Skepticism in Nanotech Deliberations,” in Quantum Engagements: Social Reflections of Nanoscience and Emerging Technologies. Zülsdorf, T.B., Coenen, C., Ferrari, A., Fiedeler, U., Milburn, C., and Wienroth, Matthias, eds. IOS Press, Amsterdam, 75–88.Google Scholar

Held, David. 1996. Models of Democracy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Hertz, Noreena. 2001. The Silent Takeover: Global Capitalism and the Death of Democracy. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Hoaglin, David C., Mosteller, Frederick, and Tukey, John W.. 1983. Understanding Robust and Exploratory Data Analysis. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Horkheimer, Max and Adorno, Theodor W.. 1991. Dialectic of Enlightenment. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

House of Lords. 2006. Science and Technology—Third Report. House of Lords, LondonGoogle Scholar

Huntington, Samuel P. 2004. Who Are We?: The Challenges to America’s National Identity. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Huntington, Samuel P. 1996. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Irwin, Alan. 2006. “The Politics of Talk: Coming to Terms with the “New” Scientific Governance.” Social Studies of Science 36 (2): 299–320.Google Scholar

Jacquet, Jennifer. 2015. Is Shame Necessary?: New Uses for an Old Tool. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar

Jasanoff, Sheila. 2005. Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Kadushin, Charles. 2012. Understanding Social Networks: Theories, Concepts, and Findings. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kaeser, Gigi and Gillespie, Peggy. 1999. Love Makes a Family: Portraits of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Parents and Their Families. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar

Kahane, David, Weinstock, Daniel, Leydet, Dominique, and Williams, Melissa. 2010. Deliberative Democracy in Practice. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar

Kahneman, Daniel. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.Google Scholar

Kahneman, Daniel, Slovic, Paul, and Tversky, Amos. 1982. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Karpf, David. 2012. The MoveOn Effect: The Unexpected Transformation of American Political Advocacy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Karr-Morse, Robin, and Wiley, Meredith S.. 2012. Scared Sick: The Role of Childhood Trauma in Adult Disease. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Karslake, Daniel. 2007. For the Bible Tells Me So. DVD. New York: First Run Features.Google Scholar

Kelly, Jamie Terence 2012. Framing Democracy: A Behavioral Approach to Democratic Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Kinsey, Alfred, C., Pomeroy, Wardell Baxter, and Martin, Clyde E.. 1948. Sexual Behavior in the Human Male. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Co.Google Scholar

Kinsey, Alfred, C. 1953. Sexual Behavior in the Human Female. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Co.Google Scholar

Knorr-Cetina, Karin. 1999. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lawrence, William. 1946. Dawn Over Zero: The Story of the Atomic Bomb. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar

LeDoux, Joseph, E. 2002. Synaptic Self: How Our Brains Become Who We Are. New York: Viking.Google Scholar

LeDoux, Joseph, E. 1996. The Emotional Brain: The Mysterious Underpinnings of Emotional Life. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Leighninger, Matt. 2012. “Mapping Deliberative Civic Engagement: Pictures from a (R)evolution,” in Democracy in Motion: Evaluating the Practice and Impact of Deliberative Civic Engagement, Nabatchi, T. et al., eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 32–37.Google Scholar

Lichtenstein, Sarah and Slovic, Paul. 2006. The Construction of Preference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lyon, Arabella. 2013. Deliberative Acts: Democracy, Rhetoric, and Rights. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Maia, Rousiley C. M. 2012. Deliberation, the Media and Political Talk. New York: Hampton Press.Google Scholar

Manjoo, Farhad. 2008. True Enough: Learning to Live in a Post-Fact Society. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar

Mann, Thomas E., and Ornstein, Norman J.. 2012. It’s Even Worse Than it Looks: How the American Constitutional System Collided with the New Politics of Extremism. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Mansbridge, Jane, 1999. “Everyday Talk in the Deliberative System.” in Deliberative Politics, Macedo, S., Ed. Oxford University Press, 211–239.Google Scholar

Mansbridge, Jane, Bohman, James, Chambers, Simone, Christiano, Thomas, Fung, Archon, Parkinson, John, Dennis Thompson, F., and Mark Warren, E. 2012. “A Systemic Approach to Deliberative Democracy,” in Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale, Parkinson, John and Mansbridge, Jane, eds. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

McNabb, David. 2004. Research Methods for Political Science: Quantitative and Qualitative Methods. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe, 384–385.Google Scholar

Mendelberg, Tali. 2001. The Race Card: Campaign Strategy, Implicit Messages, and the Norm of Equality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Middlebrook, Diane Wood 1998. Suits Me: The Double Life of Billy Tipton. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Milgram, Stanley. 1974. Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Mol, Annemarie. 2002. The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Moran, Michael, Rein, Martin, and Goodin, Robert E.. 2006. The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mosteller, Frederick, and Tukey, John W.. 1977. Data Analysis and Regression: A Second Course in Statistics. Reading: Addison-Wesley Publishing. Co.Google Scholar

Muthu, Sankar. 2003. Enlightenment Against Empire. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Nabatchi, Tina, Gastil, John, Michael Weiksner, G., and Leighninger, Matt, eds. 2012. Democracy in Motion: Evaluating the Practice and Impact of Deliberative Civic Engagement. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nanda, Serena 1999. Gender Diversity: Crosscultural Variations, Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.Google Scholar

Neblo, Michael. 2005. “Thinking through Democracy: Between the Theory and Practice of Deliberative Politics.” Acta Politica 40 (2): 169–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Omi, Michael, and Winant, Howard. 1994. Racial Formation in the United States: From the 1960s to the 1990s. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Oreskes, Naomi and Conway, Erik M.. 2010. Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. New York: Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar

Owen, R., Stilgoe, J., and Macnaghten, P.. 2012. “Responsible Research and Innovation: From Science in Society to Science for Society, with Society.” Science and Public Policy 39 (6): 751–760.Google Scholar

Owen, Richard, Bessant, John, and Heintz, Maggy. 2013. Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society. Wiley. http://lib.myilibrary.com?id=477769.Google Scholar

Palmer, Parker J. 2011. Healing the Heart of Democracy: The Courage to Create a Politics Worthy of the Human Spirit. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Parekh, Bhikhu C. 2000. Rethinking Multiculturalism: Cultural Diversity and Political Theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Parkhill, Karen, Pidgeon, Nick, Corner, Adam, and Vaughan, Naomi. 2013. “Deliberation and Responsible Innovation: A Geoengineering Case Study,” in Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, Richard Owen, Richard, Bessant, John, and Heintz, Maggy, eds. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Parkhill, Karen, A., Demski, Christina, Butler, Catherine, Spence, Alexa, and Pidgeon, Nicholas F.. 2013. Transforming the UK Energy System: Public Values, Attitudes and Acceptability – Synthesis Report. London: UK Energy Research Centre.Google Scholar

Parkinson, John. 2006. Deliberating in the Real World: Problems of Legitimacy in Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Parkinson, John and Mansbridge, Jane J.. 2012. Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

PEW Charitable Trusts. 2015. The Precarious State of Family Balance Sheets. Washington DC: The PEW Charitable Trusts.Google Scholar

PEW Research Center. 2013. A Survey of LGBT Americans: Attitudes, Experiences and Values in Changing Times, in LGBT in Changing Times. Washington DC: PEW Research Center.Google Scholar

PEW Research Center. 2013a. In Gay Marriage Debate, Both Supporters and Opponents See Legal Recognition as “Inevitable,” Washington DC: The PEW Research Center for the People & The Press, 8–17.Google Scholar

PEW Research Center. 2012. The Rise of Residential Segregation by Income. Social & Demographic Trends. Washington DC: PEW Research Center.Google Scholar

Pidgeon, Nicholas, F., Demski, Christina, Butler, Catherine, Parkhill, Karen, and Spence, Alexa. 2014. “Creating a National Citizen Engagement Process for Energy Policy.” PNAS 111 (4): 13606–13613.Google Scholar

Pidgeon, Nicholas, F. and Fischhoff, Baruch. 2011. “The Role of Social and Decision Sciences in Communicating Uncertain Climate Risks.” Nature Climate Change 1 (1): 35–41.Google Scholar

Pidgeon, Nick. 1998. “Risk Assessment, Risk Values and the Social Science Programme: Why We Do Need Risk Perception Research.” Reliability Engineering & System Safety 59 (1): 5–15.Google Scholar

Pinker, Steven. 2011. The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Putnam, Robert D. 2000. Bowling Alone: the Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Renn, Ortwin, Webler, Thomas, and Wiedemann, Peter M.. 1995. Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar

Rhee, Nari and Boivie, Ilana. 2015. “The Continuing Retirement Savings Crisis.” Washington DC: National Institute on Retirement Security.Google Scholar

Robinson, Gene. 2012. God Believes in Love: Straight Talk About Gay Marriage. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar

Robinson, Gene. 2008. In the Eye of the Storm: Swept to the Center by God. New York: Seabury Books.Google Scholar

Robson, Colin. 2002. Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar

Rocco, Raymond. 2014. Transforming Citizenship: Democracy, Membership, and Belonging in Latino Communities. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar

Rogers, Everett, M. 2003. Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Roscoe, Will. 2000. Changing Ones: Third and Fourth Genders in Native North America. New York: St. Martin’s Griffin.Google Scholar

Rosenberg, Shawn W. 2007. Deliberation, Participation and Democracy: Can the People Govern? Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Roughgarden, Joan. 2009. Evolution’s Rainbow: Diversity, Gender, and Sexuality in Nature and People. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Rudacille, Deborah. 2005. The Riddle of Gender: Science, Activism, and Transgender Rights. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar

Rupp, Leila J. 2009. Sapphistries: A Global History of Love Between Women. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Savage, Dan and Miller, Terry. 2012. It Gets Better: Coming Out, Overcoming Bullying, and Creating a Life Worth Living. New York: Penguin BooksGoogle Scholar

Scaer, Robert, C. 2014. The Body Bears The Burden: Trauma, Dissociation, and Disease. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Scaer, Robert, C. 2005. The Trauma Spectrum: Hidden Wounds and Human Resiliency. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar

Sen, Rinku. The Accidental American: Immigration and Citizenship in the Age of Globalization. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar

Shapiro, Ian and Graetz, Michael J.. 2006. Death by a Thousand Cuts: The Fight Over Taxing Inherited Wealth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Shilts, Randy. 1987. And the Band Played On: Politics, People, and the AIDS Epidemic. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar

Smelser, Neil, J. 2004. “Psychological Trauma and Cultural Trauma,” in Cultural Trauma and Collective Identity, Alexander, Jeffrey C., ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Smith, Graham. 2009. Democratic Innovations: Designing Institutions for Citizen Participation. Goodin, Robert E., ed. Theories of Institutional Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Stebbins, Robert A. 2001. Exploratory Research in the Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Stiglitz, Joseph E. 2012. The Price of Inequality: How Today’s Divided Society Endangers our Future. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar

Stilgoe, Jack, Lock, Simon J., and Wilsdon, James. 2014. “Why Should We Promote Public Engagement with Science?” Public Understanding of Science 23 (1): 4–15.Google Scholar

Stilgoe, Jack, Watson, Matthew, and Kuo, Kirsty. 2013. “Public Engagement with Biotechnologies Offers Lessons for the Governance of Geoengineering Research and Beyond.” PLoS Biology 11 (11): e1001707.Google Scholar

Stirling, Andy. 2010. “Keep It Complex.” Nature 468 (7327): 1029–1031.Google Scholar

Thompson, Dennis. 2008. “Deliberative Democratic Theory and Empirical Political Science.” Annual Review of Political Science 11 (1): 497–520.Google Scholar

Tsvetovat, Maksim and Kouznetsov, Alexander. 2011. Social Network Analysis for Startups. Sebastopol: O’Reilly.Google Scholar

Tukey, John W. 1984. “We Need Both Exploratory and Confirmatory,” in The Collected Works of John W. Tukey, Jones, Lyle V., ed. Belmont: Wadsworth Advanced Books & Software. Vol. 4, 811–817.Google Scholar

Turkle, Sherry. 2011. Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Van der Kolk, Bessel A., McFarlane, Alexander C., and Weisaeth, Lars, eds. 1996. Traumatic Stress: The Effects of Overwhelming Experience on Mind, Body, and Society. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Wahls, Zach and Littlefield, Bruce. 2012. My Two Moms: Lessons of Love, Strength, and What Makes A Family. New York: Gotham Books.Google Scholar

Wasik, Bill. 2009. And Then There’s This: How Stories Live and Die in Viral Culture. New York: Viking.Google Scholar

Wiggershaus, Rolf. 1994. The Frankfurt School: Its History, Theories, and Political Significance. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Wilsdon, James and Willis, Rebecca. 2004. See-Through Science: Why Public Engagement Needs to Move Upstream. London: Demos.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1968. Philosophical Investigations. Translated by Anscombe, G. E. M.. 3rd edition. New York: Macmillian Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Wolin, Sheldon, S. 2008. Democracy Incorporated: Managed Democracy and the Specter of Inverted Totalitarianism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Wright, Scott and Street, John. 2007. “Democracy, Deliberation and Design: the Case of Online Discussion Forums.” New Media & Society 9 (5): 849–869.Google Scholar

Wynne, Brian. 2006. “Public Engagement as a Means of Restoring Public Trust in Science – Hitting the Notes, but Missing the Music?” Community Genetics 9 (3): 211–220.Google Scholar

Yarbo-Bejarano, Yvonne. 2006. “Gloria Anzaldúa’s Borderlands/La Frontera: Cultural Studies, ‘Difference,’ and the Non-Unitary Subject.” in The Chicana/o Cultural Studies Reader, Chabram-Dernersesian, Angie, ed. New York: Routledge, 81–92.Google Scholar

Yin, Robert. 2003. Case Study Research, Design and Methods, 3rd edition. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Zimbardo, Philip. 2008. The Lucifer Effect: Understanding How Good People Turn Evil, New York: Random House.Google Scholar