Book contents
- Debating Climate Law
- Debating Climate Law
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Debate 1: Customary Law
- Debate 2: The ILC’s Role
- Debate 3: CBDR Principle
- Debate 4: Compliance
- Debate 5: Climate Litigation
- Debate 6: Human Rights
- Debate 7: Historical Responsibility
- Debate 8: Climate Migration
- Debate 9: Negative-Emission Technologies
- Debate 10: Solar Radiation Management
- Debate 11: Climate Assessment
- Reflection 1: Adaptation
- Reflection 2: Loss and Damage
- Reflection 3: Disappearing States
- Reflection 4: Climate Finance
- Reflection 5: Non-State Actors
- The Role of Non-State Actors in Climate Law
- Reflection 6: Regime Inconsistency
- Reflection 7: Aesthetics
- Conclusion
- Index
The Role of Non-State Actors in Climate Law
from Reflection 5: Non-State Actors
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 June 2021
- Debating Climate Law
- Debating Climate Law
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Debate 1: Customary Law
- Debate 2: The ILC’s Role
- Debate 3: CBDR Principle
- Debate 4: Compliance
- Debate 5: Climate Litigation
- Debate 6: Human Rights
- Debate 7: Historical Responsibility
- Debate 8: Climate Migration
- Debate 9: Negative-Emission Technologies
- Debate 10: Solar Radiation Management
- Debate 11: Climate Assessment
- Reflection 1: Adaptation
- Reflection 2: Loss and Damage
- Reflection 3: Disappearing States
- Reflection 4: Climate Finance
- Reflection 5: Non-State Actors
- The Role of Non-State Actors in Climate Law
- Reflection 6: Regime Inconsistency
- Reflection 7: Aesthetics
- Conclusion
- Index
Summary
The majority of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions result from the activities of non-state actors (NSAs). States recognize the need to engage with NSAs as mitigation actors, including by encouraging or requiring them to pledge, or commit to, mitigation action. NSAs are also making waves through civil-society organizations (CSOs) bringing cases to court to test the legal obligations of large corporations. This chapter reflects on the academic and social debates on whether NSAs—in particular, companies, cities, and CSOs—have any legal obligation to mitigate climate change or could meaningfully assume such an obligation, and whether they have demonstrated any kind of effective leadership in mitigation action. The author finds that, while NSAs assert themselves as high-profile players in the mitigation realm, their effectiveness is unclear, and so is their theorization as actors from a legal-scholarly perspective.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Debating Climate Law , pp. 379 - 397Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
- 6
- Cited by