Cochran, William G. 1983. Planning and Analysis of Observational Studies. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Chapters 1, 2, 3, 4, 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenland, Sander, Mansourina, Mohammad Ali and Altman, Douglas G.. 2016. Sparse Data Bias: A Problem Hiding in Plain Sight. British Medical Journal 352(i1982). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i1981.Google Scholar

Johnson, Daniel E. 2014. Progress in Regression: Why Natural Language Data Calls for Mixed-Effects Models. Unpublished manuscript. www.danielezrajohnson.com/johnson_2014b.pdf.Google Scholar

Winter, Bodo. 2020. Statistics for Linguistics. New York: Routledge. Chapters 14 and 15.Google Scholar

Algeo, John. 2006. British or American English? A Handbook of Word and Grammar Patterns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Barth, Danielle, and Kapatsinski, Vsevolod. 2018. Evaluating Logistic Mixed-Effects Models of Corpus-Linguistic Data in Light of Lexical Diffusion. In Speelman, Dirk, Heylen, Kris and Geeraerts, Dirk, eds. Mixed-Effects Regression Models in Linguistics. New York: Springer. 99–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biber, Douglas. 1998. Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biber, Douglas, and Gray, Bethany. 2013. Being Specific about Historical Change: The Influence of Sub-Register. Journal of English Linguistics 41(2). 104–34. http://eng.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/0075424212472509.Google Scholar

Burnard, Lou, ed. 2007. Reference Guide for the British National Corpus (XML edition). British National Corpus Consortium & Research Technologies Service at Oxford University Computing Services. www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk/docs/URG/BNCdes.html.Google Scholar

Cruttenden, Alan. 2014. Gimson’s Pronunciation of English. 8th ed. London: Arnold.Google Scholar

Davies, Mark. 2008–. The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 600 Million Words, 1990–Present. www.english-corpora.org/coca.Google Scholar

Desgraupes, Bernard, and Loiseau, Sylvain. 2018. rcqp: Interface to the Corpus Query Protocol. R package version 0.5. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rcqp.Google Scholar

Elwert, Felix, and Winship, Christopher. 2014. Endogenous Selection Bias: The Problem of Conditioning on a Collider Variable. Annual Review of Sociology 40. 31–53. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Firth, David. 1993. Bias Reduction of Maximum Likelihood Estimates. Biometrika 80(1). 27–38. https://doi.org/10.2307/2336755.Google Scholar

Gelman, Andrew, and Greenland, Sander. 2019. Are Confidence Intervals Better Termed ‘Uncertainty Intervals’? British Medical Journal 366(l5381). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l5381.Google ScholarPubMed

Greenland, Sander, Mansourina, Mohammad Ali and Altman, Douglas G. 2016. Sparse Data Bias: A Problem Hiding in Plain Sight. British Medical Journal 352 (i1982). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i1981.Google Scholar

Hiltunen, Turo, McVeigh, Joe and Säily, Tanja. 2017. How to Turn Linguistic Data into Evidence? In Hiltunen, Turo, McVeigh, Joe and Säily, Tanja, eds. Big and Rich Data in English Corpus Linguistics: Methods and Explorations. Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 19. www.helsinki.fi/varieng/series/volumes/19/introduction.html.Google Scholar

Johnson, Daniel E. 2014. Progress in Regression: Why Natural Language Data Calls for Mixed-Effects Models. Unpublished manuscript. www.danielezrajohnson.com/johnson_2014b.pdf.Google Scholar

Jones, Daniel. 2011. English Pronouncing Dictionary (EPD). Edited by Roach, Peter, Setter, Jane and Esling, John. 18th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CD-ROM edition.Google Scholar

Koplenig, Alexander. 2017. The Impact of Lacking Metadata for the Measurement of Cultural and Linguistic Change Using the Google Ngram Data Sets: Reconstructing the Composition of the German Corpus in Times of WWII. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 21(1). 169–88. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqv037.Google Scholar

Lass, Roger, and Laing, Margaret. 2010. In Celebration of Early Middle English ‘H’. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 111(3). 345–54.Google Scholar

Michel, Jean-Baptiste, Shen, Yuan Kui, Aiden, Aviva Presser et al. 2010. Quantitative Analysis of Culture Using Millions of Digitized Books. Science 331(6014). 176–82. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1199644.Google Scholar

Minkova, Donka, ed. 2009. Phonological Weakness in English: From Old to Present-Day English. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Minkova, Donka. 2014. A Historical Phonology of English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

OED (Oxford English Dictionary Online). 2000–. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dictionary.oed.com/ (accessed 3 March 2020).Google Scholar

Pechenick, Eitan, Danforth, Christopher M. and Dodds, Peter Sheridan. 2015. Characterizing the Google Books Corpus: Strong Limits to Inferences of Socio-Cultural and Linguistic Evolution. PLoS ONE 10(10), e0137041. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137041.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Peters, Pam. 2004. The Cambridge Guide to English Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

R Core Team. 2019. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar

Scherer, Ralph. 2018. PropCIs: Various Confidence Interval Methods for Proportions. R package version 0.3–0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=PropCIs.Google Scholar

Schlüter, Julia. 2019. Tracing the (Re-)Emergence of /h/ and /j/ through 350 Years of Books: Mergers and Merger Reversals at the Interface of Phonetics and Phonology. Folia Linguistica 40(s1). Special issue on diachronic phonotactics. Edited by Nikolaus Ritt, Andreas Baumann and Christina Prömer. 177–202. https://doi.org/10.1515/flih-2019-0009.Google Scholar

Schlüter, Julia, and Vetter, Fabian. 2020. An Interactive Visualization of Google Books Ngrams with R and Shiny: Exploring a(n) Historical Increase in Onset Strength in a(n) Huge Database. Journal of Data Mining and Digital Humanities 21. Special issue on visualizations in historical linguistics. Edited by Benjamin Molineaux, Bettelou Los and Martti Mäkinen. https://jdmdh.episciences.org/7000.Google Scholar

Speelman, Dirk, Heylen, Kris and Geeraerts, Dirk, eds. 2018. Mixed-Effects Regression Models in Linguistics. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steel, E. Ashley, Liermann, Martin and Guttorp, Peter. 2019. Beyond Calculations: A Course in Statistical Thinking. The American Statistician 73. 392–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2018.1505657.Google Scholar

Wells, John. 2008. Longman Pronunciation Dictionary (LPD). 3rd ed. Harlow: Pearson Longman. CD-ROM edition: Longman Pronunciation Coach.Google Scholar

Winter, Bodo. 2020. Statistics for Linguistics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Winter, Bodo, and Grice, Martine. 2021. Independence and Generalizability in Linguistics. Linguistics 59(5). 1251–77.Google Scholar

Cole, Jennifer, and Shattuck-Hufnagel., Stefanie 2016. New Methods for Prosodic Transcription: Capturing Variability as a Source of Information. Laboratory Phonology 7(1). 8. https://doi.org/10.5334/labphon.29.Google Scholar

Durand, Jacques. 2017. Corpus Phonology. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. https://oxfordre.com/linguistics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.001.0001/acrefore-9780199384655-e-145.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Sebastian, and Arndt-Lappe., Sabine 2021. Better Data for More Researchers: Using the Audio Features of BNCweb. ICAME Journal 45. 125–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schlüter, Julia. 2015. Rhythmic Influence on Grammar: Scope and Limitations. In Vogel, Ralf and van de Vijver, Ruben, eds. Rhythm in Cognition and Grammar: A Germanic Perspective. (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 286). Berlin/New York: de Gruyter Mouton. 179–205.Google Scholar

Shih, Stephanie S. 2017. Phonological Influences in Syntactic Alternations. In Gribanova, Vera and Shih, Stephanie S., eds. The Morphosyntax-Phonology Connection. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 223–52.Google Scholar

Arndt-Lappe, Sabine, and Ernestus, Mirjam. 2020. Morphology–Phonology Interaction: The Role of Lexical Storage. In Pirelli, Vito, Plag, Ingo and Dressler, Wolfgang U., eds. Word Knowledge and Word Usage: A Cross-disciplinary Guide to the Mental Lexicon. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter Mouton. 191–227. www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110440577-006/html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnon, Inbal, and Snider, Neal. 2010. More Than Words: Frequency Effects for Multi-word Phrases. Journal of Memory and Language 62(1). 67–82.Google Scholar

Azzabou-Kacem, Soundess. 2018. Stress Shift in English Rhythm Rule Environments: Effects of Prosodic Boundary Strength and Stress Clash Types. Doctoral thesis. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar

Baayen, Harald R. 2008. Analyzing Linguistic Data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Blass, Anne-Katrin. 2020. The Big Mess Construction: Forms and Functions in Present-Day English. Doctoral dissertation. Trier: Trier University. https://ubt.opus.hbz-nrw.de/opus45-ubtr/frontdoor/index/index/docId/1427.Google Scholar

BNC Consortium, Bodleian Libraries, Oxford. 2007. The British National Corpus, version 3 (BNC XML Edition). www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk.Google Scholar

Boersma, Paul, and Weenink, David J. M.. 2021. Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer, version 6.1.40. Computer program. www.praat.org.Google Scholar

Bolinger, Dwight. 1958. A Theory of Pitch Accent in English. Word 14(2–3). 119–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bolinger, Dwight. 1965. Forms of English: Accent, Morpheme, Order. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bolinger, Dwight. 1981. Two Kinds of Vowels, Two Kinds of Rhythm. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar

Breiss, Canaan, and Hayes, Bruce. 2020. Phonological Markedness Effects in Sentence Formation. Language 96(2). 338–70.Google Scholar

Burnard, Lou, ed. 2007. Reference Guide for the British National Corpus (XML Edition). www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk/docs/URG.Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan. 1999. Usage-Based Phonology. In Darnell, Michael, Moravcsik, Edith A., Noonan, Michael Newmeyer, Frederick J. and Wheatley, Kathleen, eds. Functionalism and Formalism in Linguistics, vol. 1, General Papers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 211–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bybee, Joan. 2001. Phonology and Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan, and Beckner, Clay. 2015. Usage-Based Theory. In Heine, Bernd and Narrog, Heiko, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 953–79.Google Scholar

Coleman, John, Baghai-Ravary, Ladan, Pybus, John and Grau, Sergio. 2012. Audio BNC: The Audio Edition of the Spoken British National Corpus. Oxford: Phonetics Laboratory, University of Oxford.Google Scholar

Coleman, John, Liberman, Mark Y., Kochanski, Greg, Burnard, Lou and Yuan, Jiahong. 2011. Mining a Year of Speech. Paper Presented at VLSP 2011: New Tools and Methods for Very-Large-Scale Phonetics Research. University of Pennsylvania, 29–31 January 2011.Google Scholar

Davies, Mark. 2008–. The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 450 Million Words, 1990–Present. www.english-corpora.org/coca.Google Scholar

Grabe, Ester, and Warren, Paul. 1995. Stress Shift: Do Speakers Do It or Do Listeners Hear It? In Connell, Bruce and Arvaniti, Amalia, eds. Phonology and Phonetic Evidence: Papers in Laboratory Phonology IV. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 95–110.Google Scholar

Gussenhoven, Carlos. 1991. The English Rhythm Rule as an Accent Deletion Rule. Phonology 8(1). 1–35.Google Scholar

Hammond, Michael. 2014. Phonological Complexity and Input Optimization. Phonological Studies 17. 85–94.Google Scholar

Hammond, Michael. 2016. Input Optimisation: Phonology and Morphology. Phonology 33(3). 459–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

HarrellJr, Frank E. 2020. rms: Regression Modeling Strategies. Manual. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rms.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Sebastian, and Arndt-Lappe., Sabine 2021. Better Data for More Researchers: Using the Audio Features of BNCweb. ICAME Journal 45. 125–54.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Sebastian, and Evert, Stefan. 2006. BNCweb (CQP-edition): The Marriage of Two Corpus Tools. In Braun, Sabine, Kohn, Kurt and Mukherjee, Joybrato, eds. Corpus Technology and Language Pedagogy: New Resources, New Tools, New Methods. (English Corpus Linguistics 3). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. 177–95.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Sebastian, Evert, Stefan, Smith, Nicholas, Lee, David and Prytz, Ylva Berglund. 2008. Corpus Linguistics with BNCweb. A Practical Guide. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Keating, Patricia, and Shattuck-Hufnagel., Stephanie 2002. A Prosodic View of Word Form Encoding for Speech Production. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 101. 112–56.Google Scholar

Kentner, Gerrit. 2015. Stress Clash Hampers Processing of Noncanonical Structures in Reading. In Vogel, Ralf and van de Vijver, Ruben, eds. Rhythm in Cognition and Grammar: A Germanic Perspective. Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs (TiLSM) 286. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. 111–35.Google Scholar

Leech, Geoffrey, Garside, Roger and Bryant, Michael. 1994. CLAWS4: The Tagging of the British National Corpus. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 94). Kyoto, Japan. 622–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hans-Martin, Lehmann, Schneider, Peter and Hoffmann, Sebastian. 2000. BNCweb. In Kirk, John, ed. Corpora Galore: Analysis and Techniques in Describing English. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 259–66.Google Scholar

Levelt, Willem J. M. 1989. Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Levelt, Willem J., Roelofs, Ardi and Meyer, Antje S.. 1999. A Theory of Lexical Access in Speech Production. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22(1). 1–38; discussion 38–75.Google Scholar

Liberman, Mark Y., and Prince, Alan. 1977. On Stress and Linguistic Rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry 8. 249–336.Google Scholar

Lohmann, Arne. 2014. English Co-ordinate Constructions. A Processing Perspective on Constituent Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nespor, Marina, and Vogel, Irene. 1986. Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Pawley, Andrew, and Syder, Francis H.. 1983. Two Puzzles for Linguistic Theory: Nativelike Selection and Nativelike Fluency. In Richards, Jack C. and Schmidt, Richard W., eds. Language and Communication. London: Longman. 191–226.Google Scholar

Pitt, Mark, Dilley, Laura C., Johnson, Keith et al. 2007. Buckeye Corpus of Conversational Speech. Second release. Columbus, OH: Department of Psychology, Ohio State University.Google Scholar

R Core Team. 2019. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. www.R-project.org.Google Scholar

Schlüter, Julia. 2005. Rhythmic Grammar: The Influence of Rhythm on Grammatical Variation and Change in English. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Schlüter, Julia. 2015. Rhythmic Influence on Grammar: Scope and Limitations. In Vogel, Ralf and van de Vijver, Ruben, eds. Rhythm in Cognition and Grammar: A Germanic Perspective. (TiLSM 286). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. 179–205.Google Scholar

Schlüter, Julia, and Knappe, Gabriele. 2018. Synonym Selection as a Strategy of Stress Clash Avoidance. In Hoffmann, Sebastian, Sand, Andrea, Arndt-Lappe, Sabine and Dillmann, Lisa, eds. Corpora and Lexis. Amsterdam: Brill. 69–105.Google Scholar

Schweitzer, Katrin, Walsh, Michael, Calhoun, Sasha et al. 2015. Exploring the Relationship between Intonation and the Lexicon: Evidence for Lexicalised Storage of Intonation. Speech Communication 66. 65–81.Google Scholar

Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie. 1995. The Importance of Phonological Transcription in Empirical Approaches to ‘Stress Shift’ versus ‘Early Accent’: Comments on Grabe & Warren, and Vogel, Bunnell & Hoskins. In Connell, Bruce and Arvaniti, Amalia, eds. Phonology and Phonetic Evidence: Papers in Laboratory Phonology IV. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 128–40.Google Scholar

Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie. 2019. Toward an (Even) More Comprehensive Model of Speech Production Planning. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 34(9). 1202–13.Google Scholar

Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie, Ostendorf, Mari and Ross, K.. 1994. Stress Shift and Early Pitch Accent Placement in Lexical Items in American English. Journal of Phonetics 22(4). 357–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shih, Stephanie S. 2017. Phonological Influences in Syntactic Alternations. In Gribanova, Vera and Shih, Stephanie S., eds. The Morphosyntax-Phonology Connection. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 223–52.Google Scholar

Shih, Stephanie, Grafmiller, Jason, Futrell, Richard and Bresnan, Joan. 2015. Rhythm’s Role in Genitive Construction Choice in Spoken English. In Vogel, Ralf and van de Vijver, Ruben, eds. Rhythm in Cognition and Grammar: A Germanic Perspective. (TiLSM 286). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. 207–34.Google Scholar

Sinclair, John. 1991. Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Steen, Francis F., Hougaard, Anders, Joo, Jungseock et al. 2018. Toward an Infrastructure for Data-Driven Multimodal Communication Research. Linguistics Vanguard 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2017-0041.Google Scholar

Sweet, Henry. 1876. Words, Logic, and Grammar. In Transactions of the Philological Society, 1875–1876. 470–503.Google Scholar

Tilsen, Sam. 2012. Utterance Preparation and Stress Clash: Planning Prosodic Alternations. In Fuchs, Susanne, ed. Speech Planning and Dynamics (Speech production and perception 1). Frankfurt am Main/New York: Peter Lang. 115–50.Google Scholar

Tomlinson, John M., Liu, Qiang and Fox Tree, Jean E.. 2014. The Perceptual Nature of Stress Shifts. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 29(9). 1046–58.Google Scholar

Uhrig, Peter. 2018. NewsScape and the Distributed Little Red Hen Lab: A digital Infrastructure for the Large-Scale Analysis of TV Broadcasts. In Zwierlein, Anne-Julia, Petzold, Jochen, Boehm, Katharina and Decker, Martin, eds. Anglistentag 2018 in Regensburg: Proceedings./Proceedings of the Conference of the German Association of University Teachers of English. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier. 99–114.Google Scholar

Wennerstrom, Ann. 1993. Focus on the Prefix: Evidence for Word-Internal Prosodic Words. Phonology 10. 309–24.Google Scholar

Wells, John. 2008. Longman Pronunciation Dictionary. 3rd ed. Harlow: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar

Wiese, Richard. 2016. Prosodic Parallelism: Comparing Spoken and Written Language. Frontiers in Psychology 7. 1598.Google Scholar