Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Glossary
- Map of Darfur showing colonial administrative divisions and ethnic groups
- Introduction
- 1 State Authority and Local Politics before 1916: The Darfur Sultans, Turco-Egyptian Rule and the Mahdiyya
- 2 Colonial Conquest and the Politics of Alliance in Darfur, 1916–1921
- 3 ‘Healthy Oppression’? Native Administration and State Violence in Western Darfur, 1917–1945
- 4 Native Courts and Chieftaincy Disputes in Pastoralist Darfur, 1917–1937
- 5 Defining Territories, Policing Movement and the Limits of Legibility in Pastoralist Darfur, 1917–1950
- 6 Late Colonialism in Darfur: Local Government, Development and National Politics, 1937–1956
- Conclusion: State Formation, Violence and Conflict in Historical Perspective
- Bibliography
- Index
- Eastern African Studies
4 - Native Courts and Chieftaincy Disputes in Pastoralist Darfur, 1917–1937
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 May 2021
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Glossary
- Map of Darfur showing colonial administrative divisions and ethnic groups
- Introduction
- 1 State Authority and Local Politics before 1916: The Darfur Sultans, Turco-Egyptian Rule and the Mahdiyya
- 2 Colonial Conquest and the Politics of Alliance in Darfur, 1916–1921
- 3 ‘Healthy Oppression’? Native Administration and State Violence in Western Darfur, 1917–1945
- 4 Native Courts and Chieftaincy Disputes in Pastoralist Darfur, 1917–1937
- 5 Defining Territories, Policing Movement and the Limits of Legibility in Pastoralist Darfur, 1917–1950
- 6 Late Colonialism in Darfur: Local Government, Development and National Politics, 1937–1956
- Conclusion: State Formation, Violence and Conflict in Historical Perspective
- Bibliography
- Index
- Eastern African Studies
Summary
‘Every Arab of these tribes considers himself fit to rule.’
G.D. Lampen, Memoirs, SAD 734/8/64.
In both northern and, particularly, southern Darfur, authority in precolonial pastoralist groups was significantly less centralized than under British (and indeed Turco-Egyptian) colonial rule. Centralized leadership in nomadic societies has been regarded as inherently unstable, often time-limited to deal with specific circumstances, and more limited in scope than in sedentary societies. Khazanov's classic study of nomad societies outlines the various factors which bring about a demand for centralized leadership at specific points in time:
…the need to allocate rationally key resources; the establishing and regularizing of routes of pastoral migrations… need for defence; the struggle for livestock, pasture and arable lands; migrations and wars; the desire of certain groups of nomads to subdue others; particularities of relations and interaction with the outside sedentary world.
Beyond Darfur, some nomadic societies across Sahelian Africa might have been governed by more institutionalized chiefs, but even here colonial rule brought significant change. Nicolaisen's study of the Tuareg suggests that chiefs in this stratified pastoralist society had both judicial and military powers before French colonial rule. But he also shows that French rule led to the concentration of authority in the hands of individual chiefs over entire federations, whilst the leaders of other drum-groups within those federations faded into insignificance. Similarly, Asad has demonstrated how the Awlad Fadlallah lineage became dominant among the Kababish of Kordofan province, neighbouring Darfur, during the colonial period, thanks to their close relationship with the state.
In Darfur, Sharif Harir suggests that precolonial Zaghawa paramount chiefs were defined mainly by their role in providing defence and security rather than by a judicial role or by the allocation of land. These latter powers must have remained in the hands of individual clan leaders. Whilst there is little direct information on precolonial Baqqara shaykhs, in the absence of stable paramount chiefs, we might surmise that here too lineage or section leaders held a relatively broad range of responsibilities. Perhaps, as among the neighbouring Baqqara Humr in Kordofan, individual men rose to leadership of the tribe for brief periods of time and for specific purposes – particularly in times of conflict – but paramount leadership was never permanently institutionalized.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- DarfurColonial violence, Sultanic legacies and local politics, 1916-1956, pp. 115 - 152Publisher: Boydell & BrewerPrint publication year: 2015