Book contents
- Curious About Nature
- Ecology, Biodiversity and Conservation
- Curious About Nature
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface
- Foreword
- Part I Getting Curious About Nature
- 1 Fieldwork and Nature: Observing, Experimenting and Thinking
- 2 The Place of Field Studies in Environmental Science
- 3 The History of Fieldwork in the Geosciences
- 4 Pioneering Fieldwork Heroes in the Life Sciences
- 5 The Educational Benefits of Out-of-Classroom Learning
- Part II Essays: Inspiring Fieldwork
- Part III Reflections and Where Next for Field Studies
- Contributing Author Biographies
- Index
- References
3 - The History of Fieldwork in the Geosciences
from Part I - Getting Curious About Nature
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 February 2020
Book contents
- Curious About Nature
- Ecology, Biodiversity and Conservation
- Curious About Nature
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface
- Foreword
- Part I Getting Curious About Nature
- 1 Fieldwork and Nature: Observing, Experimenting and Thinking
- 2 The Place of Field Studies in Environmental Science
- 3 The History of Fieldwork in the Geosciences
- 4 Pioneering Fieldwork Heroes in the Life Sciences
- 5 The Educational Benefits of Out-of-Classroom Learning
- Part II Essays: Inspiring Fieldwork
- Part III Reflections and Where Next for Field Studies
- Contributing Author Biographies
- Index
- References
Summary
For much of its history, geography has been very largely a field science, and while today there is an increasing weight placed upon such modern technologies as computer modelling and remote sensing, fieldwork continues to be a major approach to the subject and a fundamental source of many types of inspiration and of data. It is not an exaggeration to say that many of the most significant and influential themes in physical geography and across the geophysical sciences more broadly resulted from the labours of scientists who undertook sustained programmes of work in the field. Among the themes to which one can point with pride are the ideas of Alexander von Humboldt on the indivisibility of nature, Louis Agassiz’s discovery of the Ice Age, Charles Darwin’s work on both the evolution of species and the development of coral reefs, the work of American geologists in the opening up of the American West and the development of ideas on erosion and slope evolution, Baron von Richthofen’s discovery of the true origin of loess, William Morris Davis’s elaboration of the concept of the cycle of erosion, Ellsworth Huntington’s discovery of evidence of climate change in central Asia and its role in driving human history (which led on to environmental determinism), Roy Chapman Andrews’s discovery of dinosaur eggs in Mongolia and Ralph Bagnold’s work on the fundamentals of wind movement of sand and the formation of sand dunes in deserts.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Curious about NatureA Passion for Fieldwork, pp. 66 - 86Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Adams, F. D. (1938). The Birth and Development of the Geological Sciences. Dover Publications, New York, NY.Google Scholar
Agassiz, L. (1840). Discours de Neuchâtel: Etudes sur les Glaciers. Neuchâtel, privately published.Google Scholar
Andrews, R. (1927). Explorations in Mongolia: a review of the Central Asiatic Expeditions of the American Museum of Natural History. Geographical Journal 69, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, V. R. and Pyne, S. (1978). G. K. Gilbert and modern geomorphology. American Journal of Science 278, 97–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Board, C. (1965). Field work in geography, with particular emphasis on the role of land-use survey. In Frontiers in Geographical Teaching, eds. Chorley, R. J. and Haggett, P. E.. Methuen, London, pp. 186–214.Google Scholar
Burt, T. P. and McDonnell, J. J. (2015). Whither field hydrology? The need for discovery science and outrageous hydrological hypotheses. Water Resources Research 51, 5919–5928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chorley, R. J., Dunn, A. J. and Beckinsale, R. P. (1964). The History of the Study of Landforms, Volume 1. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Chorley, R. J., Beckinsale, R. P. and Dunn, A. J. (1973). The History of the Study of Landforms, Volume 2: The Life and Work of William Morris Davis. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. R. (1842). The Structure and Distribution of Coral Islands. Smith Elder, London.Google Scholar
Davis, W. M. (1899). The Geographical Cycle. Geographical Journal 14, 481–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, W. M. (1913). Dana’s confirmation of Darwin’s theory of coral reefs. American Journal of Science 35, 173–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galton, F. (1872). The Art of Travel or Shifts and Contrivances Available in Wild Countries. John Murray, London.Google Scholar
Geikie, J. (1874). The Great Ice Age and its Relations to the Antiquity of Man. Appleton, New York, NY.Google Scholar
Gilbert, G. K. (1877). Report on the Geology of the Henry Mountains. US Geological and Geographical Survey, Washington, DC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gladfelter, E. H. (2002). Agassiz’s Legacy. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goudie, A. S. (1978). Colonel Julian Jackson and his contribution to geography. Geographical Journal 144, 264–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goudie, A. S. (1999). The history of desert dune studies over the last 100 years. In Aeolian Environments, Sediments and Landforms, eds. Goudie, A. S., Livingstone, I. and Stokes, S.. Wiley, Chichester, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
Goudie, A. S. (2008a). Aeolian processes and forms. In The History of the Study of Landforms or the Development of Geomorphology, Volume 4: Quaternary and Recent Processes and Forms (1890–1965) and the Mid-Century Revolutions, eds. Burt, T. P, Chorley, R. J, Brunsden, D, Cox, N. J and Goudie, A. S. Geological Society, London, pp. 767–804.Google Scholar
Goudie, A. S. (2008b). Wheels across the Desert. Exploration of the Libyan Desert by Motor Car. Silphium Press, London.Google Scholar
Goudie, A., Viles, H., Allison, R., et al. (1990). The geomorphology of the Napier Range, Western Australia. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 15, 308–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, J. K. (2007). The role of women in British Quaternary science. Geological Society, London, Special Publications 281, 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imbrie, J. and Imbrie, K. P. (1979). Ice Ages: Solving the Mystery. Macmillan, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ireland, H. A. (1943). History of the development of geologic maps. Geological Society of America Bulletin 54, 1227–1280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, J. (1841). What to Observe or, the Traveller’s Remembrancer. James Madden, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, P. W. (2007). Four Centuries of Geological Travel: The Search for Knowledge on Foot, Bicycle, Sledge and Camel. Geological Society of London, London.Google Scholar
Jones, W. D. and Sauer, C. O. (1915). Outline for field work in geography. Bulletin of the American Geographical Society 47, 520–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchner, J. W. (2013). The physics and chemistry of Earth’s dynamic surface (Ralph Alger Bagnold Medal Lecture). EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts 15, 14258.Google Scholar
Lewis, W. V., ed. (1960). Norwegian Cirque Glaciers. Royal Geographical Society, London.Google Scholar
Martin, G. J. (2005). All Possible Worlds: A History of Geographical Ideas, 4th edn. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar
Mathewson, K. (2001) Between “in camp” and “out of bounds”: notes on the history of fieldwork in American geography. Geographical Review 91, 215–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathewson, K. (2006). Alexander von Humboldt’s image and influence in North American geography, 1804–2004. Geographical Review 96, 416–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, K. J., ed. (1984). The International Karakoram Project. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Oldroyd, D. (1999). Early ideas about glaciation in the English Lake District: the problem of making sense of glaciation in a glaciated region. Annals of Science 56, 175–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orme, A. R. (2004). American geomorphology at the dawn of the 20th century. Physical Geography 25, 361–381.Google Scholar
Platt, R. S. (1959). Field Study in American Geography: The Development of Theory and Method Exemplified by Selections. University of Chicago, Department of Geography, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Powell, J. W. (1875). Exploration of the Colorado River of the West and its Tributaries. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Rhoads, B. L. and Thorn, C. E. (1996). Observation in geomorphology. In The Scientific Nature of Geomorphology, eds. Rhoads, B. L. and Thorn, C. E.. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp. 21–56.Google Scholar
Sack, D. (2004). Experiences and viewpoints of selected women geomorphologists from the mid-20th century. Physical Geography 25, 438–452.Google Scholar
Sack, D. (2013). Geomorphology and nineteenth century explorations of the American West. In Treatise on Geomorphology, Volume 1, ed. Shroder, J.. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 53–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slaymaker, O. (2004). Dynamic geomorphology. In Encyclopedia of Geomorphology, ed. Goudie., A. S Routledge, London, pp. 307–310.Google Scholar
Spencer, T., Stoddart, D. R. and McLean, R. F. (2008). Coral reefs. In The History of the Study of Landforms or the Development of Geomorphology. Volume 4: Quaternary and Recent Processes and Forms (1890–1965) and the Mid-Century Revolutions, eds. Burt, T. P, Chorley, R. J, Brunsden, D, Cox, N. J and Goudie, A. S. Geological Society, London, pp. 863–922.Google Scholar
Starrs, P. F. (2015). In memoriam “To Restore One’s Faith in the Subject We Profess”: the Geography of David R. Stoddart (1937–2014). Geographical Review 105, 612–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steel, R. W., ed. (1987). British Geography 1918–1945. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steers, J. A. (1987). Physical geography in the universities, 1918–1945. British Geography 1918–1945, ed. Steel, R. W. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 138–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoddart, D. R. (1997). Carl Sauer: geomorphologist. In Process and Form in Geomorphology, ed. Stoddart, D. R.. Routledge, London, pp. 340–379.Google Scholar
Thornbush, M. J., Allen, C. D. and Fitzpatrick, F. A, eds. (2014). Geomorphological Fieldwork. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
von Richthofen, F. (1882). On the mode of origin of the loess. Geological Magazine 9, 293–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wooldridge, S. W. (1955). The status of geography and the role of field work: address to the Geographical Association. Geography 40, 73–83.Google Scholar
Wooldridge, S. W. and East, W. G. (1951). The Spirit and Purpose of Geography. Hutchinson & Co, London.Google Scholar
Worster, D. (2001). A River Running West: The Life of John Wesley Powell. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar
Wulf, A. (2015). The Invention of Nature: The Adventures of Alexander von Humboldt, the Lost Hero of Science. John Murray, London.Google Scholar