Book contents
- The Culture of Military Organizations
- The Culture of Military Organizations
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I Theoretical Frameworks
- Part II Land Forces
- Part III Maritime Forces
- 14 The Royal Navy, 1900–1945
- 15 US Navy Cultural Transformations, 1945–2017
- 16 The US Marine Corps, 1973–2017
- Part IV Air Forces
- Conclusion
- Index
14 - The Royal Navy, 1900–1945
Learning from Disappointment
from Part III - Maritime Forces
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 October 2019
- The Culture of Military Organizations
- The Culture of Military Organizations
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I Theoretical Frameworks
- Part II Land Forces
- Part III Maritime Forces
- 14 The Royal Navy, 1900–1945
- 15 US Navy Cultural Transformations, 1945–2017
- 16 The US Marine Corps, 1973–2017
- Part IV Air Forces
- Conclusion
- Index
Summary
Dissatisfaction with the Royal Navy’s World War I performance led a generation of officers to analyze the fleet’s wartime record. This analysis revealed three problems: over-centralization of authority, a reluctance to fight night actions, and an overly defensive use of destroyers. In an effort to correct these issues, the Royal Navy made changes to its doctrine, training, and professional military education that improved the Navy’s World War II performance, especially in surface warfare. Reforms flowed from a variety of sources, including First Sea Lord Adm. David Beatty, contributors to the Naval Review, and Mediterranean Fleet exercise. The interwar reforms reflected an organizational culture that pursued improvement and learning in response to the perception that in World War I, the Navy failed to live up to historical standards of success.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Culture of Military Organizations , pp. 321 - 350Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019