Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T12:22:55.286Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

20 - Internet Sociality

from Part II - Applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2020

By
Moriah Stendel ,
Maxwell J. D. Ramstead  and
Samuel P. L. Veissière
Edited by
Laurence J. Kirmayer ,
Carol M. Worthman ,
Shinobu Kitayama ,
Robert Lemelson  and
Constance A. Cummings
Laurence J. Kirmayer
Affiliation:
McGill University, Montréal
Carol M. Worthman
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta
Shinobu Kitayama
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Robert Lemelson
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Constance A. Cummings
Affiliation:
The Foundation for Psychocultural Research
Get access

Summary

This chapter offers a cultural epidemiology of digital communities, describing how these groups emerge, bond, and come to develop shared embodied experiences. We argue that online communities, while seemingly novel and often “strange," can offer insights into fundamental mechanisms of human sociality albeit on an unprecedented speed and scale due to specific affordances of cyberspace. After framing this argument, we outline a noncomprehensive anthropological survey of online communities of interest. Our hope is to provide a model for how online communities grow to share interphenomenal experiences despite lack of face-to-face interaction, and how this might inform our understanding of ordinary social cognition.

Keywords

Internethuman socialityembodimentjoint-attentionaffordancescultural epidemiologytechnology
Type
Chapter
Information
Culture, Mind, and Brain
Emerging Concepts, Models, and Applications
 , pp. 461 - 476
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aiken, M., & Kirwan, G. (2012). Prognoses for diagnoses: Medical search online and “cyberchondria”. BMC Proceedings, 6(Suppl. 4), P30. https://doi.org/10.1186/1753-6561-6-S4-P30Google Scholar
Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. Verso.Google Scholar
Assefi, S. L., & Garry, M. (2003). Absolut® memory distortions: Alcohol placebos influence the misinformation effect. Psychological Science, 14(1), 77–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.01422Google Scholar
Atran, S., & Norenzayan, A. (2004). Religion’s evolutionary landscape: Counterintuition, commitment, compassion, communion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(6), 713–30. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X04000172Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice (Nice, R., Trans.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812507Google Scholar
Boyd, d. (2011). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Papacharissi, Z. (Ed.), A networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites (pp. 39–58). Routledge.Google Scholar
Bozoglan, B., Demirer, V., & Sahin, I. (2014). Problematic Internet use: Functions of use, cognitive absorption, and depression. Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 117–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.042Google Scholar
Brugger, P., Lenggenhager, B., & Giummarra, M. J. (2013). Xenomelia: A social neuroscience view of altered bodily self-consciousness. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 204. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00204Google Scholar
Bruineberg, J., & Rietveld, E. (2014). Self-organization, free energy minimization, and optimal grip on a field of affordances. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 599. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00599Google Scholar
Charland, L. C. (2004). A madness for identity: Psychiatric labels, consumer autonomy, and the perils of the Internet. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 11(4), 335–49. https://doi.org/10.1353/ppp.2005.0006Google Scholar
Chemero, A. (2003). An outline of a theory of affordances. Ecological Psychology, 15(2), 181–95. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326969ECO1502_5Google Scholar
Chemero, A. (2009). Radical embodied cognitive science. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clark, A. (2003). Natural-born cyborgs: Minds, technologies, and the future of human intelligence. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/58.1.7Google Scholar
Colombetti, G. (2013). Psychopathology and the enactive mind. In Fulford, K. W. M., Davies, M., Gipps, R. G. T., Graham, G., Sadler, J. Z., Stanghellini, G., & Thornton, T. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy and psychiatry (pp. 1083–1102). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Constant, A., Ramstead, M. J., Veissière, S. P., & Friston, K. (2019). Regimes of expectations: An active inference model of social conformity and human decision making. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 679. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00679Google Scholar
Davis, J. (2012). Prosuming identity: The production and consumption of transableism on transabled.org. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(4), 596–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211429361Google Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. M. (1992). Neocortex size as a constraint on group size in primates. Journal of Human Evolution, 22(6), 469–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2484(92)90081-JGoogle Scholar
Ferrara, E., & Yang, Z. (2015). Measuring emotional contagion in social media. PLoS ONE, 10(11), e0142390. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142390Google Scholar
Fischer, R., & Xygalatas, D. (2014). Extreme rituals as social technologies. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 14(5), 345–55. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685373-12342130Google Scholar
Fowler, J. H., & Christakis, N. A. (2008). Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: Longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham Heart Study. The BMJ, 337, a2338. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a2338Google Scholar
Fuchs, T., & De Jaegher, H. (2009). Enactive intersubjectivity: Participatory sense-making and mutual incorporation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8(4), 465–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-009-9136-4Google Scholar
Gervais, W. M., & Norenzayan, A. (2012). Like a camera in the sky? Thinking about God increases public self-awareness and socially desirable responding. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 298–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.09.006https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.09.006Google Scholar
Grieve, G. (2010). Virtually embodying the field: Silent online Buddhist meditation, immersion, and the Cardean ethnographic method. Online: Heidelberg Journal of Religions on the Internet, 4(1), 35–62. https://doi.org/10.11588/rel.2010.1.9384.Google Scholar
Henrich, J. (2016). The secret of our success: How culture is driving human evolution, domesticating our species, and making us smarter. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hrdy, S. B. (2011). Mothers and others: The evolution of mutual understanding. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hutto, D. D., Kirchhoff, M. D., & Myin, E. (2014). Extensive enactivism: Why keep it all in? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 706. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00706Google Scholar
Ingold, T. (2001). From the transmission of representations to the education of attention. In Whitehouse, H. (Ed.), The debated mind: Evolutionary psychology versus ethnography (pp. 113–53). Berg Publishers.Google Scholar
Isler, J. J. (2016). Tulpamancy: Transcending the assumption of singularity in the human mind. Paper presented at the meeting of GRACLS, “The extra-human,” The University of Texas at Austin, TX, United States of America.Google Scholar
Karakas, F. (2009). Welcome to World 2.0: The new digital ecosystem. Journal of Business Strategy, 30(4), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/02756660910972622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirmayer, L. J., Robbins, J. M., & Paris, J. (1994). Somatoform disorders: Personality and the social matrix of somatic distress. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103(1), 125–36. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.103.1.125Google Scholar
Kramer, A. D. I., Guillory, J. E., & Hancock, J. T. (2014). Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(24), 8788–90. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1320040111Google Scholar
Laycock, J. P. (2012). “We are spirits of another sort”: Ontological rebellion and religious dimensions of the otherkin community. Nova Religio, 15(3), 65–90. https://doi.org/10.1525/nr.2012.15.3.65Google Scholar
Lemogne, C., Consoli, S. M., Limosin, F., & Bonfils, P. (2015). Treating empty nose syndrome as a somatic symptom disorder. General Hospital Psychiatry, 37(3), 273.e9–10273.e10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2015.02.005Google Scholar
Mauss, M. (1973). Techniques of the body. Economy and Society, 2(1), 70–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147300000003Google Scholar
McGeoch, P. D., Brang, D., Song, T., Lee, R. R., Huang, M., & Ramachandran, V. S. (2011). Xenomelia: A new right parietal lobe syndrome. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 82(12), 1314–19. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2011-300224Google Scholar
Medoff, Z. M., & Colloca, L. (2015). Placebo analgesia: Understanding the mechanisms. Pain Management, 5(2), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.2217/pmt.15.3Google Scholar
Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371–8. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040525Google Scholar
Mueller, A. S., & Abrutyn, S. (2015). Suicidal disclosures among friends: Using social network data to understand suicide contagion. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 56(1), 131–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146514568793CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Callaghan, S. (2015). Navigating the ‘other’ world: Cyberspace, popular culture and the realm of the otherkin. Culture and Religion, 16(3), 253–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/14755610.2015.1083454Google Scholar
O’Reilly, T. (2007). What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Communications & Strategies, 65, 17–37. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/4580/1/MPRA_paper_4580.pdfGoogle Scholar
Parker, S., Garry, M., Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (2011). A sham drug improves a demanding prospective memory task. Memory, 19(6), 606–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2011.592500Google Scholar
Payne, S. C. (2009). Empty nose syndrome: What are we really talking about? Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, 42(2), 331–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2009.02.002Google Scholar
Ramstead, M. J. D., Veissière, S. P. L., & Kirmayer, L. J. (2016). Cultural affordances: Scaffolding local worlds through shared intentionality and regimes of attention. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1090. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01090Google Scholar
Raz, A., Raikhel, E., & Anbar, R. D. (2008). Placebos in medicine: Knowledge, beliefs, and patterns of use. McGill Journal of Medicine, 11(2), 206–11. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2582662/Google Scholar
Rietveld, E., & Kiverstein, J. (2014). A rich landscape of affordances. Ecological Psychology, 26(4), 325–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407413.2014.958035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saafan, M. E., Hegazy, H. M., & Albirmawy, O. A. (2016). Empty nose syndrome: Etiopathogenesis and management. The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology, 32(3), 119–29. https://doi.org/10.4103/1012-5574.186540Google Scholar
Sperber, D. (1996). Explaining culture: A naturalistic approach. Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Starcevic, V., & Aboujaoude, E. (2015). Cyberchondria, cyberbullying, cybersuicide, cybersex: “New” psychopathologies for the 21st century? World Psychiatry, 14(1), 97–100. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20195Google Scholar
Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2009). Why we cooperate. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M., & Rakoczy, H. (2003). What makes human cognition unique? From individual to shared to collective intentionality. Mind & Language, 18(2), 121–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00217Google Scholar
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Veissière, S. (2016). Varieties of Tulpa experiences: The hypnotic nature of human sociality, personhood, and interphenomenality. In Raz, A. & Lifshitz, M. (Eds.), Hypnosis and meditation: Towards an integrative science of conscious planes (pp. 55–76). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Veissière, S., & Gibbs-Bravo, L. (2016). Juicing: Language, ritual, and placebo sociality in a community of extreme eaters. In Cargill, K. (Ed.), Food cults: How fads, dogma, and doctrine influence diet (pp. 63–86). Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Veissière, S. P. L., & Stendel, M. (2018). Hypernatural monitoring: A social rehearsal account of smartphone addiction. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 141. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00141Google Scholar
Veissière, S. P., Constant, A., Ramstead, M. J., Friston, K. J., & Kirmayer, L. J. (2020). Thinking through other minds: A variational approach to cognition and culture. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 43, e90, 1–75. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X19001213Google Scholar
Whitehouse, H. (2001). Transmissive frequency, ritual, and exegesis. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 1(2), 167–81. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853701316931399Google Scholar
Whitehouse, H. (2004). Modes of religiosity: A cognitive theory of religious transmission. Rowman Altamira.Google Scholar
Xygalatas, D., Mitkidis, P., Fischer, R., Reddish, P., Skewes, J., Geertz, A.W., Roepstorff, A., & Bulbulia, J. (2013). Extreme rituals promote prosociality. Psychological Science, 24(8), 1602–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612472910Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×