from PART III - MODERATE CRITICISM
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 December 2017
Recently, criticism of the ECtHR has taken on quite a drastic tone in Switzerland. The criticism is largely confined to the political sphere and the media. For example, some commentators called the practice or particular judgments of the ECtHR “bizarre” (concerning the interpretation of the right to a rejoinder), “unworldly” (relating to the judgment in the case of Hadri-Vionnet), or as being “at the limit of comprehensibility” (concerning the practice of the ECtHR in child abduction cases). In academic articles, criticism is sometimes couched in somewhat more subtle terms such as “human rights vs. legality” or “sacralisation of the law vs. primacy of politics”. In singular cases, criticism of individual ECtHR judgments against Switzerland even resorted to polemical language.
While the current political debate on Switzerland's relationship to the Convention system is characterised by a harsh tone, there is a consensus among the major political parties, the Swiss government as well as the majority of Swiss academics that the ECtHR performs a crucial function with regard to the protection of democracy, freedom and the rule of law. A recent attempt by a member of the Federal Council (the Swiss government) directed at terminating ECHR membership, failed to gain the approval of the other Council members. In addition, there have been repeated interventions by non-governmental organisations (e.g. Amnesty International Switzerland), several civil society associations (e.g. foraus, Verein “Unser Recht”, Informationsplattform humanrights.ch), and academic think tanks (e.g. the Swiss Centre of Expertise in Human Rights) stressing the importance of the Convention protection mechanism for Switzerland. Nevertheless, it is not unlikely that the present critical debate will result in changes of Swiss law, cutting back on the direct and the indirect domestic influence of the ECtHR on the Swiss legal order.
CRITICISM OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
CRITICISM IN THE MEDIA, ACADEMIA, POLITICAL ARENA, AND THE JUDICIARY
High-circulation media in Switzerland presents, on the whole, a balanced view of the debate on the ECtHR. Usually, newspapers like “Blick”, “Tagesanzeiger” and “Neue Zürcher Zeitung” try to picture the full range of opinions of the political spectrum.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.