Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T02:00:16.366Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - The Nature and Nurture of Critical Thinking

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Diane F. Halpern
Affiliation:
Claremont McKenna College
Robert J. Sternberg
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Henry L. Roediger III
Affiliation:
Washington University, St Louis
Diane F. Halpern
Affiliation:
Claremont McKenna College, California
Get access

Summary

It was during a presentation on ways to enhance critical thinking in college classes that a jaded faculty member shot back at me, “What kind of thinking do you think I teach – noncritical thinking?” I assured this faculty member that no offense had been intended, although certainly it had been taken. In fact, often there is noncritical, or more appropriately labeled, rote memorization or lower level thinking that is taught and tested in many classrooms at all levels of education at the expense of higher order or critical thinking.

NONCRITICAL THINKING

Consider, for example, typical questions that might be found on tests given in developmental psychology classes. There is the ubiquitous question that asks students to list each stage of Piaget's theory of cognitive development, along with the age range for each stage, and an example of a cognitive task that can be accomplished at each stage. This is a basic recall question, even though there is an opportunity to provide an example, which allows for the application of the knowledge of what cognitive abilities become possible at each stage of development. The example given is almost always the same as an example that was presented in class or in the text. If this is the extent of students' knowledge, they are unlikely to be able to use Piaget's conceptualization of cognitive development in any applied setting (such as designing an age-appropriate toy or activity for a preschool) or in a novel or useful way.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Diamond, R. M. (1997). Curriculum reform needed if students are to master core concepts [Web Page]. Retrieved December 28, 2000, from http://chronicle.com/search97cgi/s97_cgi?.
Ennis, R. (2001). Goals for a critical thinking curriculum and assessment. In Costa, A. (Ed.), Developing minds (3rd ed., pp. 44–46.) Alexandria, VA: ASCD Publications.Google Scholar
Epley, N., Keysar, B., Boven, L., & Gilovich, T.(2004). Perspective taking as egocentric anchoring and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 327–339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fischer, S. C., & Spiker, V. A. (2000). A framework for critical thinking research and training (Report prepared for the U.S. Army Research Institute, Arlington, VA).Google Scholar
Fong, G. T., Krantz, D. H., & Nisbett, R. E. (1986). The effects of statistical training on thinking about everyday problems. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 253–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galinsky, A. D., & Mussweiler, T. (2001). First offers as anchors: The role of perspective-taking and negotiator focus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 657–669.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gallup Poll of attitudes toward public education. (2004, August 27). Wall Street Journal, p. A12.
Halpern, D. F. (2003). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking (4th ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Halpern, D. F., & Riggio, H. R. (2003). Thinking critically about critical thinking: Workbook to accompany Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking (4th ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Jepson, C., Krantz, D. H., & Nisbett, R. (1993). Inductive reasoning: Competence or skill? In Nisbett, R. E. (Ed.), Rules for reasoning (pp. 70–89). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Jones, E. A., Dougherty, B. C., Fantaske, P., & Hoffman, S. (1997). Identifying college graduates' essential skills in reading and problem-solving: Perspectives of faculty, employers and policymakers (Contract No. R117G10037/CDFA84.117G). University Park, MD: U.S. Department of Education/OERI.Google Scholar
Jones, E. A., Hoffman, S., Moore, L. M., Ratcliff, G., Tibbetts, S., & Click, B. A. (1995). National assessment of college student learning: Identifying college graduates' essential skills in writing, speech and listening, and critical thinking (NCES Publication No. 95-001). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1121–1134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moseley, D. (2004). Thinking skill frameworks for post-16 learners: An evaluation. Research report submitted to the Learning and Skills Research Centre, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, England.
Nieto, A. M., & Saiz, C. (2006). Development and evaluation of a program designed to improve critical thinking. Manuscript submitted for publication (available at http://web.usal.es/emid/pips/pips.htm).
Nisbett, R. (1993). Rules for reasoning. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Paul, R. W., Willson, J., & Binker, A. J. (1993). Critical thinking: What every person needs to survive in a rapidly changing world. Dillon Beach, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking.Google Scholar
Rubinstein, M. F., & Firstenberg, I. R. (1987). Tools for Thinking. In Stice, J. E. (Ed.), Developing critical thinking and problem-solving abilities (pp. 0–0). New Directions for Teaching and Learning, no. 30. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Son, L. K. (2004). Spacing one's study: Evidence for a metacognitive control strategy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 601–604.Google ScholarPubMed
Sternberg, R. J. (1996). Successful intelligence: How practice and creative intelligence determine success in life. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Wisdom, intelligence, and creativity synthesized. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Torff, B., & Grigorenko, E. L. (1998). Teaching triarchically improves school achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 374–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thinking Skills Review Group. (2005, December). The impact of the implementation of thinking skills programmes and approaches on teachers. Newcastle, UK: University of Newcastle, Learning and Research Center.
Woods, D. R. (1987). How might I teach problem solving? In Stice, J. E. (Ed.), Developing critical thinking and problem-solving abilities (pp. 0–0). New Directions for Teaching and Learning, no. 30. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×