Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Illustrations and Tables
- List of Contributors
- Preface
- 1 The Nature and Nurture of Critical Thinking
- 2 Evaluating Experimental Research
- 3 Critical Thinking in Quasi-Experimentation
- 4 Evaluating Surveys and Questionnaires
- 5 Critical Thinking in Designing and Analyzing Research
- 6 The Case Study Perspective on Psychological Research
- 7 Informal Logical Fallacies
- 8 Designing Studies to Avoid Confounds
- 9 Evaluating Theories
- 10 Not All Experiments Are Created Equal
- 11 Making Claims in Papers and Talks
- 12 Critical Thinking in Clinical Inference
- 13 Evaluating Parapsychological Claims
- 14 Why Would Anyone Do or Believe Such a Thing?
- 15 The Belief Machine
- 16 Critical Thinking and Ethics in Psychology
- 17 Critical Thinking in Psychology
- Author Index
- Subject Index
- References
16 - Critical Thinking and Ethics in Psychology
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Illustrations and Tables
- List of Contributors
- Preface
- 1 The Nature and Nurture of Critical Thinking
- 2 Evaluating Experimental Research
- 3 Critical Thinking in Quasi-Experimentation
- 4 Evaluating Surveys and Questionnaires
- 5 Critical Thinking in Designing and Analyzing Research
- 6 The Case Study Perspective on Psychological Research
- 7 Informal Logical Fallacies
- 8 Designing Studies to Avoid Confounds
- 9 Evaluating Theories
- 10 Not All Experiments Are Created Equal
- 11 Making Claims in Papers and Talks
- 12 Critical Thinking in Clinical Inference
- 13 Evaluating Parapsychological Claims
- 14 Why Would Anyone Do or Believe Such a Thing?
- 15 The Belief Machine
- 16 Critical Thinking and Ethics in Psychology
- 17 Critical Thinking in Psychology
- Author Index
- Subject Index
- References
Summary
INTRODUCTION
The contributions of those in the field of psychology to society are in part based upon trust. The public places its trust in psychologists for their capacity to offer scientific knowledge and services that contribute to individual and social welfare. The public trusts psychologists to use acceptable scientific methods and to honestly report their research results. The legal system trusts psychologists to provide accurate and unbiased expert testimony during court proceedings. Finally, clients place their trust in psychologists who provide psychotherapy to maintain confidentiality, practice within the limits of their competence, and to give quality care. Psychologists who publish false results, violate confidentiality, or testify in court or practice in areas outside their training competence jeopardize the public trust in psychology as a discipline.
Professional ethics is concerned with doing what is right. In the discipline of psychology, doing what is right is associated with conducting oneself in ways that aspire to satisfy a number of moral principles. For example, psychologists make a commitment to conduct themselves in ways that maximize benefits and avoid harms to those with whom they work. They promote honesty in psychological science, teaching, and practice and strive to fulfill their role responsibilities to society. Finally, they treat people fairly and respect the dignity and worth of all with whom they work. In effect, psychologists are “active moral agents committed to the good and just practice and science of psychology” (Fisher, 2003, p. 237).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Critical Thinking in Psychology , pp. 271 - 288Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2006