We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 June 2011
Theory against itself
The necessary decentering cannot be a philosophic or scientific act as such, since it is a question of dislocating, through access to another system linking speech and writing, the founding categories of language and the grammar of the epistémè. The natural tendency of theory – what unites philosophy and science in the epistémè – will push rather toward filling in the breach than toward forcing the closure.
(OG, 92)Within the theoretical discourse of our time, one of the most provocative challenges to the philosophical foundations of our tradition comes from a collection of rigorously subversive textual practices referred to as “deconstruction.” As the opening quotation indicates, Derrida's challenge to traditional philosophy seems to oppose the philosophical ideal of coherence – the ideal to which theory gravitates – with the effect of deconstruction, which is to discover the heterogeneity of the discursive or textual conditions of theory, the fissures and ambiguities in the conceptual structure of the epistémè (the fabric of signs and texts that constitute the historical present). At times, as in the above passage, the relation between theory and deconstruction seems to be one of antagonism. When philosophy proposes an ideal order capable of appropriation by theoretical discourse, deconstructive critique shows the discourse to be already contaminated by the same impurities philosophy is trying to escape. For many, the significance of this theory-subverting power is to spell the fundamental antagonism between theory and deconstruction. Yet, even among the advocates of deconstruction, the precise relation of theory to deconstruction is not so clear.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.
