We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 April 2022
Introduction
Community safety officers (CSOs) have emerged as local security providers in a dozen Canadian cities since 2001. First developed in the UK, the CSO model has been since transferred to Australia too (Cherney and Sutton, 2004). CSOs are not private security agents, since they are public employees of municipalities and other levels of government. Despite being publicly funded, CSOs are not public police either, because they lack key police powers and don dissimilar uniforms. CSOs conduct active patrols in downtown areas and other neighbourhoods as a form of reassurance policing (Barker and Crawford, 2013) and community policing (Brogden and Nijhar, 2005; Fielding and Innes, 2006; Lambert et al, 2012). They tend to operate according to the ‘broken windows’ thesis (Wilson and Kelling, 1982; Harcourt, 2005) that seeks to remove visible signs of disorder. As a result, CSOs in Canada have also become responsible for multiple practices, including regulation of nuisance and anti-graffiti campaigns.
CSOs operate in Western Canadian cities that lack a public police department or receive minimal Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) service. They are also expanding where local public police are said to require additional support. No scholarship has examined why these CSOs have emerged in Canada, how local policing and security provision are impacted, or the international policy connections that CSOs may have in Canada. In the UK, CSOs were first introduced via New Labour legislation (Crawford and Lister, 2004; Hughes and Gilling, 2004). In 1998, local governments were mandated by the Home Office ‘to develop local partnerships with strategies for reducing crime and disorder’ (Gilling and Hughes, 2002: 5). For Canadian CSOs, the principal knowledge transfer stimulus has been CSOs in England. Some Canadian CSOs have emerged independently of public police, but the RCMP also has created a CSO programme to enhance visible presence in towns where regular RCMP officers cannot conduct high-cost patrols. Whether CSOs in Canada differ from CSOs elsewhere has not been examined.
Like the conservation officers and ambassadors we reflect on in other chapters, in many ways CSOs are being called upon to manage conduct at the frontier of crime that is merely disruptive or out of place.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.
