We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 January 2024
There have been various attempts to regulate the CRA industry in the United States, at the transnational level and by the European Union over recent decades. The global financial crisis of 2008 represents a turning point in these efforts, when there was a clear shift from a light- touch approach of self- regulation to a mandatory system of CRA supervision and regulation. As we will see, despite these reforms there are limits to addressing the rating problems encountered during the GFC.
US efforts
In the United States, the relationship between government regulation and CRAs first began as late as the 1970s. This happened indirectly through bond regulations of financial institutions. In 1975 the SEC introduced rule 15c3- 1, also known as the net capital rule. Investors purchasing bonds rated in the investment- grade category by at least two nationally recognized statistical rating organizations (NRSROs) had to hold fewer reserves against these bonds. The SEC did not formally specify the eligibility criteria for NRSRO status. This led to an ambivalent constellation: Although regulators started to use credit ratings for regulatory purposes, CRAs themselves continued to be largely free of regulation (Hiss & Nagel 2014: 132).
In the wake of the Enron scandal in 2001, the United States led attempts to abandon the CRA self- regulation paradigm. CRAs were criticized for having missed Enron's towering accounting frauds. CRAs failed to fulfil their role as the market's watchdogs or “gatekeepers” (Coffee 2006). Moody's and S&P's downgraded Enron's credit rating below investment grade only four days before the company filed for bankruptcy on 2 December 2001 (Coffee : 247).
In hearings before the Committee on Governmental Affairs of the US Senate, invited experts suggested regulating the CRAs for the first time (Hiss & Nagel 2011 2014: 133). These calls became louder during the course of the WorldCom scandal in 2002. As in the case of Enron, the CRAs were criticized for having failed to spot the breakdown and accounting frauds of the company in time. WorldCom filed for bankruptcy on 22 July 2002. Both Moody's and S&P's had downgraded the company below investment grade only two months beforehand (Langohr & Langohr 2008: 14).
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.
