Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-18T14:05:25.590Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Dynamic Processes within Associative Memory Stores: Piecing Together the Neural Basis of Creative Cognition

from SECTION TWO - CREATIVITY AND REASON IN COGNITION AND NEUROSCIENCE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2016

By
Adam S. Bristol  and
Indre V. Viskontas
Edited by
James C. Kaufman  and
John Baer
Adam S. Bristol
Affiliation:
Aquilo Capital Management
Indre V. Viskontas
Affiliation:
University of San Francisco
James C. Kaufman
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut
John Baer
Affiliation:
Rider University, New Jersey
Get access

Summary

Memory is essential for creativity. Consider, for example, the classical four-stage model of creativity proposed by Wallas (1926), based on the ideas of Helmholtz (1896) in which creative achievement occurs through preparation, incubation, illumination, and verification. Preparation, the stage in which adequate knowledge of the creative domain is acquired, necessarily involves extensive encoding of information and the ability to retain that information over time. Verification, the stage in which creative output is evaluated in terms of its accuracy or utility, must involve the retrieval of information and skills necessary for the appraisal. The incubation and illumination stages involve memory processes insofar as previously acquired information is recombined to generate and recognize a novel idea. Clearly, memory processes figure prominently at every stage of this model. How can memory be so flexible such that information acquired in one way can be manipulated and recapitulated in so many other ways? What clues are there to the neural mechanisms underlying these dynamic memory processes?

We attempt to address these questions in this chapter by conceptualizing creative cognition as a set of separable but interdependent cognitive processes that collectively generate creative output. We are particularly interested in processes that interact with information stored in memory to either facilitate or hinder the novel recombining of ideas that is characteristic of creative cognition. We first describe the associationist approach to creativity, one that is amenable to a variety of cognitive and neuroscientific analyses. This discussion will provide a precursor to our integration of discoveries on the nature of human memory retrieval with cognitive processes that have been defined in creative thinkers. More specifically, we consider one oft-cited attribute of creative individuals, reduced behavioral and cognitive inhibition (e.g., Eysenck, 1995; Martindale, 1999), and merge it with insights into inhibitory processes regulating retrieval from semantic memory stores. Lastly, we apply the results of functional neuroimaging studies on inhibitory process in memory retrieval to generate a possible neurobiological mechanism underlying this aspect of creative cognition. Thus, this chapter offers two central ideas: (1) a distinct mechanism by which inhibitory cognitive mechanisms may alter the expression of creativity and (2) an improved outline of the neurobiological systems upon which this mechanism operates.

Type
Chapter
Information
Creativity and Reason in Cognitive Development , pp. 187 - 210
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, G. A., Mahler, W. A., & Estes, W. K. (1969). Effects of recall tests on long-term retention of paired associates. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 8, 463–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, M. C., Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (1994). Remembering can cause forgetting: Retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1063–1087.Google ScholarPubMed
Anderson, M. C., & Green, C. (2001). Suppressing unwanted memories by executive control. Nature, 410, 366–369.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, M. C., Ochsner, K. N., Kuhl, B., Cooper, J., Robertson, E., Gabrieli, S. W., Glover, G. H., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2004). Neural systems underlying the suppression of unwanted memories. Science, 303, 232–235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, M. C., & Spellman, B. A. (1995). On the status of inhibitory mechanisms in cognition: Memory retrieval as a model case. Psychological Review, 102, 68–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnes, J. M., & Underwood, B. J. (1959). “Fate” of first-list associations in transfer theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 95–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benjamin, A. S. & Bjork, R. A. (1996). Retrieval fluency as a metacognitive index. In Reder, L. M. (Ed.), Implicit memory and metacognition (pp. 309–338). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bernstein, D. A., & Goss, S. S. (1999). Functional fixedness in problem solving. In Broeker, C. B. (Ed.), Activities handbook for the teaching of psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 216–217). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (1992). A new theory of disuse and an old theory of stimulus fluctuation. In Healy, A. F., Kossyln, S. M., & Schiffrin, R. M., (Eds.), Essays in honor of William K. Estes: From learning processes to cognitive processes (Vol. 2, pp. 35–67). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bleuler, E. (1911). Dementia praecox or the group of schizophrenics. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
Boivin, M. J., Giordani, B., Berent, S., Amato, D. A., Lehtinen, S., Koeppe, R. A., Buchtel, H. A., Foster, N. L., & Kuhl, D. E. (1992). Verbal fluency and positron emission tomographic mapping of regional cerebral glucose metabolism. Cortex, 28, 231–239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bousfield, W. A., Sedgewick, C. H. W., & Cohen, B. H. (1954). Certain temporal characteristics of the recall of verbal associates. American Journal of Psychology, 57, 111–118.Google Scholar
Bulevich, J. B.,Roediger, H. L. III., Balota, D. A., & Butler, A. C. (2006). Failures to find suppression of episodic memories in the think/no-think paradigm. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1569–1577.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlsson, I., Wendt, P. E., & Risberg, J. (2000). On the neurobiology of creativity: Differences in frontal activity between high and low creative subjects. Neuropsychologia, 38, 873–885.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carrier, M., & Pashler, H. (1992). The influence of retrieval on retention. Memory & Cognition, 11, 633–642.Google Scholar
Carson, S. H., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2003). Decreased latent inhibition is associated with increased creative achievement in high-functioning individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 499–506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coney, J., & Serna, P. (1995). Creative thinking for an information processing perspective: A new approach to Mednick's theory of associative hierarchies. Journal of Creative Behavior, 29, 109–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coren, S., & Schulman, M. (1971). Effects of an external stress on commonality of verbal associates. Psychological Reports, 28, 328–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Dentler, R. A., & Mackler, B. (1964). Originality: Some social and personal determinants. Behavioral Science, 9, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Depue, B. E. (2012). A neuroanatomical model of prefrontal inhibitory modulation of memory retrieval. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 36, 1382–1399.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Desiderato, O., & Sigal, S. (1970). Associative productivity as a function of creativity level and type of verbal stimulus. Psychonomic Science, 18, 357–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Souza, L., Volle, E., Bertoux, M., Czernecki, V., Funkiewiez, A., Allali, G., Leroy, B., Sarazin, M., Habert, M. O., Dubois, B., Kas, A., & Levy, R. (2010). Poor creativity in frontotemporal dementia: a window into the neural basis of the creative mind. Neuropsychologia, 48, 3733–3742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Souza, L. C., Guimarães, H. C., Teixeira, A. L., Caramelli, P., Levy, R., Dubois, B., & Volle, E. (2014). Frontal lobe neurology and the creative mind. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 761–806.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dougherty, K. M., & Johnston, J. M. (1996). Overlearning, fluency, and automaticity. Behavior Analyst, 19, 289–292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eysenck, H. (1995). Genius: The natural history of creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbach, G. B., & Evans, R. G. (1981). The remote associates test as a predictor of productivity in brainstorming groups. Applied Psychological Measurement, 5, 333–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmholtz, H. v. (1896). Vortäge und Reden. Brunswick, Germany: Friedrich Vieweg.Google Scholar
Hodges, J. R., Patterson, K., Oxbury, S., & Funnell, E. (1992). Semantic dementia progressive fluent aphasia with temporal lobe atrophy. Brain, 115(6), 1783–1806.Google ScholarPubMed
Horton, D. L., Marlowe, D., & Crowne, D. (1963). The effect of instruction set and need for social approval on commonality of word association responses. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 67–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudspeth, S. (1985). The neurological correlates of creative thought. PhD. dissertation, University of Southern California.
Jansson, D. G., & Smith, S. M. (1991). Design fixation. Design Studies, 12, 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koppel, R. H., & Storm, B. C. (2014). Escaping mental fixation: Incubation and inhibition in creative problem solving. Memory, 22, 340–348.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krop, H. D., Alegre, C. E., & Williams, C. D. (1969). Effects of induced stress on convergent and divergent thinking. Psychological Reports, 24, 895–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindgren, H. C., & Lindgren, F. (1965). Brainstorming and orneriness as facilitators of creativity. Psychological Reports, 16, 577–583.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lubow, R. E., & Gewirtz, J. C. (1995). Latent inhibition in humans: Data, theory, and implications for schizophrenia. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 87–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maltzman, I., Bogartz, W., & Breger, L. (1958a). A procedure for increasing word association originality and its transfer effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 392–398.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maltzman, I., Brooks, L. O., Bogartz, W., & Summers, S. S. (1958b). The facilitation of problem solving by prior exposure to uncommon responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 399–406.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maltzman, I., Simon, S., & Licht, L. (1962). Verbal conditioning of common and uncommon word associations. Psychological Reports, 10, 363–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martindale, C. (1971). Degeneration, disinhibition, and genius. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 7, 177–182.3.0.CO;2-N>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martindale, C. (1977). Creativity, consciousness, and cortical arousal. Journal of Altered States of Consciousness, 3, 69–87.Google Scholar
Martindale, C. (1981). Cognition and consciousness. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.Google Scholar
Martindale, C. (1990). Creative imagination and neural activity. In Kunzendorf, R. & Sheikh, A. (Eds.), Psychophysiology of mental imagery: Theory, research, and application. (pp. 89–108). Amityville, NY: Baywood.Google Scholar
Martindale, C. (1999). Biological bases of creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 137–152). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Martindale, C., Anderson, K., Moore, K., & West, A. N. (1996). Creativity, oversensitivity, and rate of habituation. Personality and Individual Differences, 20, 423–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martindale, C., & Hines, D. (1975). Creativity and cortical activation during creative intellectual and EEG feedback tasks. Biological Psychology, 3, 91–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mednick, M. T., Mednick, S. A., & Jung, C. C. (1964). Continual association as a function of level of creativity and type of verbal stimulus. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69, 511–515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, B. L., Boone, K., Cummings, J. L., Read, S. L., & Mishkin, F. (2000). Functional correlates of musical and visual ability in frontotemporal dementia. British Journal of Psychiatry, 176, 458–463.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, B. L., Cummings, J., Mishkin, F., Boone, K., Prince, F., Ponton, M., & Cotman, C. (1998). Emergence of artistic talent in fronto-temporal dementia. Neurology, 51, 978–982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohr, C., Graves, R. E., Gianotti, L. R. R., Pizzagalli, D., & Brugger, P. (2001). Loose but normal: A semantic association study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30, 475–483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murayama, K., Miyatsu, T., Buchli, D., & Storm, B. C. (2014). Forgetting as a consequence of retrieval: A meta-analytic review of retrieval-induced forgetting. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1383–1409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neely, J. H. (1976). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Evidence for facilitatory and inhibitory processes. Memory & Cognition, 4, 648–654.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, K. (1974). Concept, word, and sentence: Interrelations in acquisition and development. Psychological review, 81(4), 267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickerson, R. S. (1984). Retrieval inhibition from part-set cuing: A persisting enigma in memory research. Memory & Cognition, 12, 531–552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roediger, H. L. III., & Neely, J. H. (1982). Retrieval blocks in episodic and semantic memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36, 213–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scoville, W. B., & Milner, B. (1957). Loss of recent memory after bilateral hippocampal lesions. Journal of Neurochemistry, 20, 11–21.Google ScholarPubMed
Smith, S. M., & Tindell, D.R. (1997). Memory blocks in word fragment completion caused by involuntary retrieval of orthographically similar primes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 355–370.Google Scholar
Smith, S. M., Ward, T. B., & Schumacher, J. S. (1993). Constraining effects of examples in a creative generation task. Memory & Cognition, 21(6), 837–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, A. W., Bahramali, H., Hawker, T., & Mitchell, D. J. (2006). Savant-like numerosity skills revealed in normal people by magnetic pulses. Perception, 35, 837–845.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snyder, A. W., Mulcahy, E., Taylor, J. L., Mitchell, D. J., Sachdev, P., & Gandevia, S. C. (2003). Savant-like skills exposed in normal people by suppressing the left fronto-temporal lobe. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience, 2, 149–158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spitzer, M. (1997). A cognitive neuroscience view of schizophrenia thought disorder. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 23, 29–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spitzer, M., Braun, U., Hermle, L., & Maier, S. (1993). Associative semantic network dysfunction in thought-disordered schizophrenic patients: Direct evidence from indirect semantic priming. Biological Psychiatry, 34, 864–877.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Squire, L. R. (1992). Memory and the hippocampus: A synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans. Psychological Review, 99, 195–231.Google ScholarPubMed
Stickgold, R., Scott, L., Rittenhouse, C., & Hobson, J. A. (1999). Sleep-induced changes in associative memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 182–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Storm, B. C., & Angello, G. (2010). Overcoming fixation. Creative problem solving and retrieval-induced forgetting. Psychological Science, 21, 1263–1265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Storm, B. C., Angello, G., & Bjork, E. L. (2011). Thinking can cause forgetting: memory dynamics in creative problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology – Learning, Memory and Cognition, 37, 1287–1293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Viskontas, I. V., Boxer, A. L., Fesenko, J., Matlin, A., Heuer, H. W., Mirsky, J., & Miller, B. L. (2011). Visual search patterns in semantic dementia show paradoxical facilitation of binding processes. Neuropsychologia, 49, 468–478.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York: Hardcourt, Brace, & World.Google Scholar
Warren, R. E. (1977). Time and spread of activation in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 3, 458–466.Google Scholar
Wiley, J. (1998). Expertise as mental set: The effects of domain knowledge in creative problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 26, 716–730.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×