Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T12:41:35.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Attention, Cognitive Flexibility, and Creativity: Insights from the Brain

from SECTION TWO - CREATIVITY AND REASON IN COGNITION AND NEUROSCIENCE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2016

By
Oshin Vartanian
Edited by
James C. Kaufman  and
John Baer
Oshin Vartanian
Affiliation:
University of Toronto Scarborough
James C. Kaufman
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut
John Baer
Affiliation:
Rider University, New Jersey
Get access

Summary

As an emerging area of research, the neuroscience of creativity has made significant strides over the last decade by beginning to elucidate the brain bases of creative cognition (Vartanian, Bristol, & Kaufman, 2013). Among researchers and practitioners of creativity, the contributions of this new area are deemed valuable to the extent that they shed light on the key mechanisms and processes that underlie creativity. In this sense, rather than merely confirming what is already known about creativity using a new set of metrics, the true worth of neuroscientific data will involve the quality of the tools and ideas it offers for testing the “joints in the system” (Goel, 2005, p. 268; see also Shallice, 1988). In turn, as better mechanistic accounts of brain function in relation to creativity emerge, neuroscientifically informed interventions to facilitate this mode of thinking in educational, professional, and applied settings can be developed.

As noted by Goel (2005) in relation to another high-order process – reasoning – the contribution neuroscience can make to our understanding of cognition includes but also extends beyond elucidating mechanisms. Specifically, and more immediately, neuroscientific data have been a great source of knowledge regarding dissociation of cognitive functions. For example, Miller and Tippet (1996) administered Guilford's (1967) classic Match Problems task to patients with focal brain lesions and normal controls. Critically, two types of problems were administered to the participants: one set of problems involved straightforward match removal for solution, whereas another set of problems required “set shifting” to arrive at correct solutions. In the problem solving literature a set shift is defined as the ability to overcome the conceptual and/or perceptual constraints that define the problem space. Set shift problems are typically measured using perseverative errors in the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (Grant & Berg, 1948), given that they demonstrate the participant's inability to revise the card sorting strategy following a rule change. Miller and Tippett (1996) reported that patients with focal right prefrontal cortex (PFC) lesions were impaired specifically on those match problems that required set shifts, but not otherwise. In addition, this selective impairment in performance on set-shift problems was especially apparent in patients with lesions to right ventral (as opposed to dorsal) PFC. Importantly, no such selective impairment on set-shift problems was observed in patients with temporal-occipital, parietal, central, or left frontal lesions.

Type
Chapter
Information
Creativity and Reason in Cognitive Development , pp. 246 - 258
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aron, A. R. (2007). The neural basis of inhibition in cognitive control. The Neuroscientist, 13, 214–228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Badre, D., & Wagner, A. D. (2007). Left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and the cognitive control of memory. Neuropsychologia, 45, 2883–2901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaty, R. E., Benedek, M., Kaufman, S. B., & Silvia, P. J. (2015). Default and executive network coupling supports creative idea production. Scientific Reports, 5, Article 10964.CrossRef
Beaty, R. E., Benedek, M., Wilkins, R. W., Jauk, E., Fink, A., Silvia, P. J., Hodges, D. A., Koschutnig, K., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014). Creativity and the default network: A functional connectivity analysis of the creative brain at rest. Neuropsychologia, 64, 92–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beaty, R. E., & Silvia, P. J. (2012). Why do ideas get more creative across time? An executive interpretation of the serial order effect in divergent thinking tasks. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 309–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaty, R. E., Silivia, P. J., Nusbaum, E. C., Jauk, E., & Benedek, M. (2014). The roles of associative and executive processes in creative cognition. Memory and Cognition, 42, 1186–1197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bressler, S., & Menon, V. (2010). Large-scale brain networks in cognition: Emerging methods and principles. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 277–290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67, 380–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carson, S. H., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2005). Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the creative achievement questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christoff, K., Gordon, A. M., Smallwood, J., Smith, R., & Schooler, J. W. (2009). Experience sampling during fMRI reveals default network and executive system contributions to mind wandering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 106, 8719–8724.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christoff, K., Gordon, A. M., & Smith, R. (2011). The role of spontaneous thought in human cognition. In Vartanian, O. & Mandel, D. R. (Eds.), Neuroscience of decision making (pp. 259–284). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Curtis, C. E., & D’Esposito, M. (2003). Persistent activity in the prefrontal cortex during working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 415–423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dorfman, L., Martindale, C., Gassimova, V., & Vartanian, O. (2008). Creativity and speed of information processing: A double dissociation involving elementary versus inhibitory cognitive tasks. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1382–1390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fink, A., Grabner, R. H., Benedek, M., Reishofer, G., Hauswirth, V., Fally, M.Neuper, C., Ebner, F., & Neubauer, A. C. (2009). The creative brain: Investigation of brain activity during creative problem solving by means of EEG and fMRI. Human Brain Mapping, 30, 734–748.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilhooly, K. J., Fioratou, E., Anthony, S. H., & Wynn, V. (2007). Divergent thinking: Strategies and executive involvement in generating novel uses for familiar objects. British Journal of Psychology, 98, 611–625.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goel, V. (2005). Can there be a cognitive neuroscience of central cognitive systems? In Erneling, C. E. & Johnson, D. M. (Eds.), Mind as a scientific object: Between brain and culture (pp. 265–282). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gonen-Yaacovi, G., de Souza, L. C., Levy, R., Urbanski, M., Josse, G., & Volle, E. (2013). Rostral and caudal prefrontal contribution to creativity: A meta-analysis of functional imaging data. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7. Article 465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grant, D. A., & Berg, E. A. (1948). A behavioural analysis of degree of reinforcement and ease of shifting to new responses in a Weigl-type card-sorting problem. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 404–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Haider, H., Frensch, P. A., & Joram, D. (2005). Are strategy shifts caused by data-driven processes or by voluntary processes?Consciousness and Cognition, 14, 495–519.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jung, R. E., & Haier, R. J. (2007). The Parieto-Frontal Integration Theory (P-FIT) of intelligence: converging neuroimaging evidence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30, 135–154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jung, R. E., Mead, B. S., Carrasco, J. & Flores, R. A. (2013). The structure of creative cognition in the human brain. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, Article 330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kris, E. (1952). Psychoanalytic explorations in art. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
Limb, C. J., & Braun, A. R. (2008). Neural substrates of spontaneous musical performance: An fMRI study of jazz improvisation. PLoS ONE, 3, Article e1679.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacDonald, A. W., Cohen, J. D., Strenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2000). Dissociating the role of dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. Science, 288, 1835–1838.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martindale, C. (1995). Creativity and connectionism. In Smith, S. M., Ward, T. B., & Finke, R. A. (Eds.), The creative cognition approach (pp. 249–268). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Martindale, C. (1999). Biological bases of creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 137–152). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mendelsohn, G. A. (1976). Associative and attentional processes in creative performance. Journal of Personality, 44, 341–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, L. A., & Tippett, L. J. (1996). Effects of focal brain lesions on visual problem-solving. Neuropsychologia, 34, 387–398.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Posner, M. I., & Rothbart, M. K. (2007). Research on attention networks as a model for the integration of psychological science. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raichle, M. E., MacLeod, A. M., Snyder, A. Z., Powers, W. J., Gusnard, D. A., & Shulman, G. L. (2001). A default mode of brain function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 98, 676–682.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rueda, M. R., Posner, M. I., & Rothbart, M. K. (2005). The development of executive attention: Contributions to the emergence of self-regulation. Developmental Neuropsychology, 28, 573–594.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rypma, B., Prabhakaran, V., Desmond, J. E.Glover, G. H., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (1999). Load-dependent roles of frontal brain regions in the maintenance of working memory. NeuroImage, 9, 216–226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shallice, T. (1988). From neuropsychology to mental structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torrance, E. P. (1974). The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking norms – Technical manual (research ed.) for figural tests, Forms A and B. Princeton, NJ: Personnel Press.Google Scholar
Vartanian, O. (2009). Variable attention facilitates creative problem solving. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3, 57–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vartanian, O. (2012). Dissociable neural systems for analogy and metaphor: Implications for the neuroscience of creativity. British Journal of Psychology, 103, 302–316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vartanian, O., Bristol, A. S., & Kaufman, J. C. (Eds.). (2013). Neuroscience of creativity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vartanian, O., Martindale, C., & Kwiatkowski, J. (2007). Creative potential, attention, and speed of information processing. Personality & Individual Differences, 34, 1370–1380.Google Scholar
Zabelina, D. L., & Robinson, M. D. (2010). Creativity as flexible cognitive control. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4, 136–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×