Creation: Avicenna's metaphysical account

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511778063.008

6 - Creation: Avicenna's metaphysical account

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 September 2010

Edited by

Janet M. Soskice and

David B. Burrell: Affiliation:
University of Notre Dame, Indiana
Carlo Cogliati: Affiliation:
Peterhouse, Cambridge
Janet M. Soskice: Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
William R. Stoeger: Affiliation:
University of Arizona

Book contents

Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

In the Middle Ages, followers of Abrahamic religions – inheritors of the Greek and Hellenistic philosophical legacy – struggled to come up with a philosophically and theologically satisfactory account of creation. The Greek and Hellenistic philosophical heritage provided at least three major ways of relating the universe to God. The universe owes to God (i) its order; (ii) its movement; or (iii) simply its existence. The first two alternatives may be traced back to Plato and Aristotle respectively. The third alternative may be associated with Platonists, especially with Plotinus, and it seems to emerge as an interpretation of Plato's position. A fourth alternative must be added to the triplet. It is that the universe owes to God not simply its existence but its existence after non-existence. This is the conception of creation which was favoured by the majority of medieval philosophers and theologians in the Western and Islamic worlds.

Avicenna (980–1037) shares concerns of his fellow philosophers and theologians affiliated with any of the three Abrahamic religions, with regard to creation taught by religion. Two major points of controversy in Avicenna's position can be identified. The first is the necessity of the universe, and the second is whether the universe began to exist. Regarding both issues, Avicenna's position caused severe debates and objections. Avicenna's position falls within the third alternative which indicates that the universe should be related to God only with regard to being, not with regard to time. He also argues against the fourth alternative.

Type: Chapter
Information: Creation and the God of Abraham , pp. 77 - 90

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511778063.008 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Richard, Sorabji, Time Creation and the Continuum (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1983), pp. 193–196Google Scholar

Gerhard, May, Creatio ex Nihilo: The Doctrine of ‘Creation out of Nothing’ in Early Christian Thought, trans. Worrall, A. S. (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1994), Chapter 1, pp. 1–38.Google Scholar

Plato, , Timaeus, trans. Zeyl, Donald J., in Cooper, John M. (ed.), Complete Works (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing, 1997), pp. 1,224–1,291, 28–29a.Google Scholar

Aristotle, , Physicsviii.1, trans. Hardie, R. P. and Gaye, R. K., in McKeon, Richard (ed.), The Basic Works of Aristotle (New York: Random House, 1941), pp. 213–394.Google Scholar

Louis, Gardet, La Pensée Religieuse d'Avicenne (Ibn Sīnā) (Paris: J. Vrin, 1951)Google Scholar

Beatrice, Zedler, ‘Saint Thomas and Avicenna in the “De Potentia Dei”’, Traditio 6 (1948), pp. 105–159Google Scholar

Herbert, Davidson, Proofs for the Eternity, Creation and the Existence of God in Medieval Islamic and Jewish Philosophy (Oxford University Press, 1987).Google Scholar

Jules, Janssens, ‘Creation and Emanation in Ibn Sina’, Documenti e Studi Sulla Tradizione Filosofica Medievale 8 (1997), pp. 455–477.Google Scholar

Avicenna, , Kitāb al-Shifā', al-Ilāhiyyāt, ed. Anawati, George C.et al., 2 vols. (Cairo: Organisation Générale des Imprimeries Gouvernementales, 1960), vi.2, p. 266.12–15Google Scholar

Harry Austryn, Wolfson, The Philosophy of the Kalam (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1976), Chapter 6, pp. 355–465.Google Scholar

Thomas, Aquinas, Summa Theologiae: Latin Text and English Translation, Introductions, Notes, Appendices, and Glossaries, ed. Gilby, Thomas (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1964–1980)Google Scholar

On the Power of God (Quaestiones de Potentia Dei), trans. English Dominican Fathers (London: Burns Oates & Washbourne, 1932–1934)

The Incoherence of the Philosophers, ed., trans. and annotated by Marmura, Michael (Provo, UT: Brigham Young University, 1997), pp. 30–36

Fazlur, Rahman, ‘Mir Damad's Concept of Huduth Dahri’, Journal of Near Eastern Studies 39 (1980), pp. 139–153Google Scholar

Thomas, Aquinas, Commentary on the Book of Causes, ed. and trans. Guagliardo, Vincent A., Hess, Charles R. and Taylor, Richard C. (Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America, 1996), pp. 148–160.Google Scholar

Avicenna, , Ta'liqāt (Qum: the Islamic Seminary of Qum, ah 1379/1421), pp. 170–171Google Scholar

Fazlur, Rahman prefers the latter alternative. See his ‘Ibn Sina's Theory of the God–World Relationship’, in Burrell, David and McGinn, Bernard (eds.), God and Creation (University of Notre Dame Press, 1990), pp. 38–52, at pp. 43 ffGoogle Scholar

Eleonore, Stump and Norman, Kretzmann, ‘Eternity’, Journal of Philosophy 78:8 (1981), pp. 429–458Google Scholar

‘God's Eternity’, Faith and Philosophy 1:4 (1984), pp. 394–402.

Steven, Weinberg, The First Three Minutes: A Modern View of the Origin of the Universe (New York: Basic Books, 1977Google Scholar

Joseph, Silk, A Short History of the Universe (New York: W. H. Freeman & Company, 1997)Google Scholar

Stoeger, William R., ‘Contemporary Cosmology and Its Implications for the Science–Religion Dialogue’, in Russell, Robert John, Stoeger, William R. and Coyne, George V. (eds.), Physics, Philosophy and Theology: A Common Quest for Understanding (Vatican Observatory Publications, 2005), pp. 219–247, esp. pp. 230–232.Google Scholar

Book contents

6 - Creation: Avicenna's metaphysical account

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive