Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T20:22:50.936Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2021

Laura Viidebaum
Laura Viidebaum
Affiliation:
New York University

Summary

A summary is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Chapter
Information
Creating the Ancient Rhetorical Tradition , pp. 245 - 270
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/cclicenses/

References

Abbenes, J. G. J., Slings, S. R. and Sluiter, I. (eds.) (1995) Greek Literary Theory after Aristotle: A Collection of Papers in Honour of D.M. Schenkeveld. Amsterdam: VU University Press.Google Scholar
Acosta Méndez, E. and Angeli, A. (1992) Filodemo: Testimonianze su Socrate. Naples: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar
Acosta-Hughes, B., Lehnus, L. and Stephens, S. (eds.) (2011) Brill’s Companion to Callimachus. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Adorno, F., Bastianini, G., Carlini, A., Decleva Caizzi, F., Funghi, M. S., Manetti, D., Manfredi, M., Montanari, F. and Sedley, D. (eds.) (2008) Corpus dei papiri filosofici greci e latini I.2 (Galenus-Isocrates). 2 vols. Florence: Olschki Editore.Google Scholar
Alexiou, E. (2000) ‘Enkomion, Biographie und die ‘unbeweglichen Statuen’: Zu Isocrates Euagoras 73–76 und Plutarch Perikles 1–2’ – Classica et mediaevalia (51), 103–17.Google Scholar
Alexiou, E. (2010) Der Euagoras des Isocrates. New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Algra, K., Barnes, J., Mansfeld, J. and Schofield, M. (eds.) (1999) The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Arnim, H. F. A. von (1898) Leben und Werke des Dio von Prusa. Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Aujac, G. (ed. and trans.) (1978) Denys d’Halicarnasse: Opuscules rhétoriques, Tome 1: Les orateurs antiques. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Aujac, G. (1988) Denys d’Halicarnasse: Opuscules rhétoriques, Tome 2: Démosthène. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Aujac, G. (1991) Denys d’Halicarnasse: Opuscules rhétoriques, Tome 4: Thucydide; Seconde lettre à Ammée. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Aujac, G. (1992) Denys d’Halicarnasse: Opuscules rhétoriques, Tome 5: L’imitation (fragments, épitomé); Première lettre à Ammée; Lettre à Pompée Géminos; Dinarque. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Aujac, G. and Lebel, M. (ed. and trans.) (1981) Denys d’Halicarnasse: Opuscules rhétoriques, Tome 3: La composition stylistique. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Auvray-Assayas, C. and Delattre, D. (eds.) (2001) Cicéron et Philodème: La polémique en philosophie. Paris: Éditions Rue d’Ulm.Google Scholar
Avery, H. C. (1991) ‘Was Eratosthenes the Oligarch Eratosthenes the Adulterer?’ – Hermes (119), 380–4.Google Scholar
Avezzù, G. (1991) Lisia: Contro i tiranni (Contro Eratostene). Venice: Marsilio Editori.Google Scholar
Balla, C. (2004) ‘Isocrates, Plato, and Aristotle on Rhetoric’ – Rhizai (1), 45–71.Google Scholar
Baraz, J. (2012) A Written Republic: Cicero’s Philosophical Politics. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1982) The Presocratic Philosophers. [2000 reprint.] London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Barwick, K. (1963) ‘Das Problem der isokrateischen Techne’ – Philologus (107), 43–60.Google Scholar
Bastianini, G. and Casanova, A. (eds.) (2007) I papiri di Saffo e di Alceo: Atti del convegno internazionale di studi, Firenze, 8–9 giugno 2006. Florence: G. Vitelli.Google Scholar
Batstone, W. W. (1985) ‘Commentary on Cooper: Oratory, Philosophy, and the Common World’ – Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy (1), 97–113.Google Scholar
Benoit, W. (1990) ‘Isocrates and Aristotle on Rhetoric’ – Rhetoric Society Quarterly (20), 251–9.Google Scholar
Bernard, H. (1997) Hermeias von Alexandrien: Kommentar zu Platon’s ‘Phaedrus’. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Berti, E. (1997) La filosofia del “primo” Aristotele. 2nd edn. Milano: Vita e pensiero.Google Scholar
Beversluis, J. (2000) Cross-Examining Socrates: A Defense of the Interlocutors in Plato’s Early Dialogues. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blank, D. L. (1985) ‘Socratics versus Sophists on Payment for Teaching’ – Classical Antiquity (4/1), 1–49.Google Scholar
Blank, D. L. (2003) ‘Atomist Rhetoric in Philodemus’ – Cronache Ercolanesi (33), 69–88.Google Scholar
Blank, D. L. (2009) ‘Philosophia and technê: Epicureans on the Arts’ – The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism, ed. Warren, J. (Cambridge University Press), 216–33.Google Scholar
Blank, T. (2014) Logos und Praxis: Sparta als politisches Exemplum in den Schriften des Isocrates. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Blass, F. (1865) Die griechische Beredsamkeit in dem Zeitraum von Alexander bis auf Augustus: Ein litterarhistorischer Versuch. [1977 reprint.] Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Blass, F. (1868) Die Attische Beredsamkeit. Band i. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Blass, F. (1887) Die Attische Beredsamkeit. Erste Abteilung: Von Gorgias bis zu Lysias. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Blass, F. (1892) Die Attische Beredsamkeit. Zweite Abteilung: Isocrates und Isaios. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Blass, F. (1893) Die Attische Beredsamkeit. Dritte Abteilung, erster Abschnitt: Demosthenes. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Blondell, R. (2002) The Play of Character in Plato’s Dialogues. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Böhme, P. (2009) Isocrates, Gegen die Sophisten: Ein Kommentar. Berlin: Lit.Google Scholar
Bollansée, J. (1999a) Hermippos of Smyrna and His Biographical Writings: A Reappraisal. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Bollansée, J. (ed.) (1999b) Felix Jacoby: Fragmente der griechischen Historiker, Part iv: Biography and Antiquarian Literature, gen. ed. Schepens, G.. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Bonner, S. F. (1938) ‘Dionysius of Halicarnassus and the Peripatetic Mean of Style’ – Classical Philology (33), 257–66.Google Scholar
Bonner, S. F. (1939) The Literary Treatises of Dionysius of Halicarnassus: A Study in the Development of Critical Method. Amsterdam: Hakkert.Google Scholar
Bons, J. (1996) Poietikon Pragma: Isocrates’ Theory of Rhetorical Composition. Dissertation: Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Bostock, D. (1988) Plato’s Theaetetus. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bowersock, G. W. (1965) Augustus and the Greek World. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bowersock, G. W. (1979) ‘Historical Problems in Late Republican and Augustan Classicism’ – Flashar, (1979), 57–75.Google Scholar
Boys‐Stones, G. and Rowe, C. (eds.) (2013) The Circle of Socrates: Readings in the First‐Generation Socratics. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Bringmann, K. (1965) Studien zu den politischen Ideen des Isokrates. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Brown, E. (2009) ‘Politics and Society’ – Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism, ed. Warren, J. (Cambridge University Press), 179–96.Google Scholar
Bruns, I. (1896) Das literarische Porträt der Griechen im fünften und vierten Jahrhundert vor Christi Geburt. Berlin: Hertz.Google Scholar
Brzoska, J. (1883) De canone decem oratorum Atticorum quaestiones. Dissertation: Breslau.Google Scholar
Buchheim, T. (1989) Gorgias von Leontinoi: Reden, Fragmente und Testimonien. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Buchheit, V. (1960) Untersuchungen zu Theorie des genos epideiktikon von Gorgias bis Aristoteles. Munich: Huber.Google Scholar
Büchler, O. (1936) Die Unterscheidung der redenden Personen bei Lysias: Eine stilistische Untersuchung der διήγησις. Heidelberg: Bilabel.Google Scholar
Buchner, E. (1958) Der Panegyrikos des Isocrates: Eine historisch-philologische Untersuchung. Wiesbaden: F. Steiner.Google Scholar
Bülow-Jacobsen, A. (ed.) (1994) Proceedings of the 20th International Congress of Papyrologists, Copenhagen 23–29 August 1992. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.Google Scholar
Burk, A. (1923) Die Pädagogik des Isocrates als Grundlegung des humanistischen Bildungsideals: Im Vergleich mit den zeitgenössischen und den modernen Theorien. Würzburg: C. J. Becker.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. (1996) ‘Enthymeme: Aristotle on the Rationality of Rhetoric’ – Oksenberg Rorty, (1996), 88–115.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. (1998) ‘First Words: A Valedictory Lecture’ – Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society (43), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairns, D. and Knox, R. A. (eds.) (2004) Law, Rhetoric, and Comedy in Classical Athens: Essays in Honour of Douglas M. MacDowell. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. (1995) Callimachus and His Critics. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Canevaro, M. (2013) The Documents in the Attic Orators: Laws and Decrees in the Public Speeches of the Demosthenic Corpus. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Canevaro, M. and Gray, B. (eds.) (2018) The Hellenistic Reception of Classical Athenian Democracy and Political Thought. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canfora, L. (2018) ‘Afterlife (Antiquity and Byzantine Era)’ – Martin (2018b), 431–52.Google Scholar
Carey, C. (1989) Lysias: Selected Speeches. Cambridge Greek and Latin Classics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carey, C. (1990) ‘Structure and Strategy in Lysias XXIV’ – Greece & Rome (37), 44–51.Google Scholar
Carey, C. (1992) Apollodoros against Neaira: [Demosthenes] 59. Warminster: Aris & Phillips.Google Scholar
Carey, C. (1994) ‘Rhetorical Means of Persuasion’ –Worthington, (1994), 26–45.Google Scholar
Carey, C. (ed.) (2007) Lysiae orationes cum fragmentis. Oxford Classical Texts. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Cartledge, P. (1987) Agesilaos and the Crisis of Sparta. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Cartledge, P. (2009) Ancient Greek Political Thought in Practice. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Castagnoli, L. (2010) Ancient Self-Refutation: The Logic and History of the Self-Refutation Argument from Democritus to Augustine. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Charalabopoulos, N. G. (2012) Platonic Drama and Its Ancient Reception. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiron, P. (1993) Démétrios: Du style. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Chiron, P. (2002) Pseudo-Aristote: Rhétorique à Alexandre. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Chroust, A.-H. (1973) Aristotle: New Light on His Life and on Some of His Lost Works. Vol ii. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Clarke, M. L. (1971) Higher Education in the Ancient World. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Classen, C. J. (2010) Herrscher, Bürger und Erzieher: Beobachtungen zu den Reden des Isocrates. Spudasmata (133). Hildesheim: Georg Olms.Google Scholar
Clay, D. (1994) ‘The Origins of the Socratic Dialogue’ – Vander Waerdt, (1994), 23–47.Google Scholar
Cocurullo, M. (2001) ‘Il contributo dei papiri alla conoscenza di Lisia’ – Papyrologica Lupiensia (10), 113–70.Google Scholar
Cole, T. (1991) The Origins of Rhetoric in Ancient Greece. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Collins II, J. H. (2015) Exhortations to Philosophy: The Protreptics of Plato, Isocrates, and Aristotle. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Collins Edwards, L. (2010) ‘Shifting Paradigms: Mimesis in Isocrates’ – Mitsis, and Tsagalis, (2010), 377–400.Google Scholar
Cooper, C. R. (1992) The Development of the Biographical Tradition on the Athenian Orators in the Hellenistic Period. Dissertation: University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Cooper, C. R. (2000) ‘Philosophers, Politics, Academics: Demosthenes’ Rhetorical Reputation in Antiquity’ – Worthington, (2000), 224–45.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. M. (1985) ‘Plato, Isocrates and Cicero on the Independence of Oratory from Philosophy’ – Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy (1), 77–96.Google Scholar
Cope, E. M. (1867) An Introduction to Aristotle’s Rhetoric. With Analysis, Notes and Appendices. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cope, E. M. (1877) The Rhetoric of Aristotle, vol. iii: Commentary. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cornell, T. (ed.) (2013) The Fragments of the Roman Historians. 3 vols. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Costil, P. (1949) L’esthétique littéraire de Denys d’Halicarnasse. Paris: Bibliothèque de la Sorbonne.Google Scholar
Covino, R. and Smith, C. (eds.) (2010) Praise and Blame in Roman Republican Rhetoric. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales.Google Scholar
Damon, C. (1991) ‘Aesthetic Response and Technical Analysis in the Rhetorical Writings of Dionysius of Halicarnassus’ – Museum Helveticum (48), 33–58.Google Scholar
Davies, J. K. (1971) Athenian Propertied Families, 600–300 B.C. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Davison, C. C. (2009) Pheidias: The Sculptures & Ancient Sources. London: Insitute of Classical Studies.Google Scholar
de Jonge, C. C. (2005) ‘Dionysius of Halicarnassus and the Method of Metathesis’ – CQ (55), 463–80.Google Scholar
de Jonge, C. C. (2008) Between Grammar and Rhetoric: Dionysius of Halicarnassus on Language, Linguistics and Literature. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
de Jonge, C. C. (2009) Review of Demetrio: Lo Stile, Nicoletta Marini – Bryn Mawr Classical Review 12 August 2009.Google Scholar
de Jonge, C. C. (2012) ‘Dionysius and Longinus on the Sublime: Rhetoric and Religious Language’ – AJP (133), 271–300.Google Scholar
de Jonge, C. C. (2018) ‘Demosthenes vs. Cicero: Intercultural Competition in Ancient Literary Criticism’ – Eris vs. Aemulatio: Competition in Classical Antiquity, ed. Damon, C. and Pieper, C. (Leiden: Brill), 300–23.Google Scholar
de Jonge, C. C. and Hunter, R. (eds.) (2018) Dionysius of Halicarnassus and Augustan Rome: Rhetoric, Criticism and Historiography. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
De Quincey, T. (1862) Style and Rhetoric and Other Papers. Edinburgh: Adam and Charles Black.Google Scholar
de Romilly, J. (1954) ‘Les modérés athéniens vers le milieu du IVe siècle : Échos et concordances’ – Revue des Études Grecques (67), 327–54.Google Scholar
de Romilly, J. (1958) ‘Eunoia in Isocrates or the Political Importance of Creating Good Will’ – Journal of Hellenic Studies (78), 92–101.Google Scholar
de Romilly, J. (1992) The Great Sophists in Periclean Athens. Trans. J. Lloyd. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Denniston, J. D. (1927) ‘Technical Terms in Aristophanes’ – CQ (21), 113–21.Google Scholar
Depew, D. J. and Poulakos, T. (eds.) (2004) Isocrates and Civic Education. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Destrée, P. and Murray, P. (eds.) (2015) A Companion to Ancient Aesthetics. Malden, MA, Oxford and Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Devries, W. L. (1892) Ethopoiia: A Rhetorical Study of the Types of Character in the Orations of Lysias. Baltimore, MD: Murphy.Google Scholar
DeWitt, N. W. (1954) Epicurus and His Philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
DeWitt, N. W. and DeWitt, N. J. (1949) Demosthenes, vol. vii: Funeral Speech, Erotic Essay, Exordia and Letters. Loeb Classical Library. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Di Matteo, T. (1997) ‘Isocrate nella Retorica di Filodemo’ – Cronache Ercolanesi (27), 121–36.Google Scholar
Dihle, A. (1977) ‘Der Beginn des Attizismus’ – Antike und Abendland (23), 162–77.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. (2003) The Heirs of Plato. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Dindorf, W. (1855) Scholia graeca in Homeri Odysseam. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dindorf, W. (1970) Scholia Graeca in Aeschinem et Isocratem. [Reprint of 1852 edn.] Hildesheim: Dr. H. A. Gerstenberg.Google Scholar
Dodds, E. (1959) Plato: Gorgias. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Dominik, W. J. (ed.) (1997) Roman Eloquence: Rhetoric in Society and Literature. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dorandi, T. (1990) ‘Per una ricomposizione dello scritto di Filodemo sulla Retorica’ – Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik (82), 59–87.Google Scholar
Dorandi, T. (2013) Diogenes of Laertius: Lives of Eminent Philosophers. Cambridge Classical Texts. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Douglas, A. E. (1956) ‘Cicero, Quintilian, and the Canon of Ten Attic Orators’ – Mnemosyne (9), 30–40.Google Scholar
Dover, K. J. (1968a) Lysias and the Corpus Lysiacum. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Dover, K. J. (1968b) Aristophanes: Clouds. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Dover, K. J. (1997) The Evolution of Greek Prose Style. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Dow, J. (2015) Passions and Persuasion in Aristotle’s Rhetoric. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dugan, J. (2005) Making the New Man: Ciceronian Self-Fashioning in the Rhetorical Works. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Düring, I. (1961) Aristotle’s Protrepticus: An Attempt at Reconstruction. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar
Eden, K. (1986) Poetic and Legal Fiction in the Aristotelian Tradition. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Eden, K. (1987) ‘Hermeneutics and the Ancient Rhetorical Tradition’ – Rhetorica (5/1), 59–86.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. J. (1998) ‘Notes on Pseudo-Plutarch’s Life of Antiphon’ – CQ (48), 82–92.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. J. (1999) Lysias: Five speeches (1, 12, 19, 22, 30). Bristol: Classical Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. J. (2013) Review of Tarik Wareh Theory and Practice of Life: Isocrates and the Philosophers – Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2013.09.14.Google Scholar
Egger, M. F. (1902) Denys d’Halicarnasse: Essai sur la critique et la rhétorique chez les Grecs au siècle d’Auguste. Paris: A. Picard et fils.Google Scholar
Einarson, B. (1936) ‘Aristotle’s Protrepticus and the Structure of the Epinomis’ – Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association (67), 261–85.Google Scholar
Engels, J. (2003) ‘Antike Überlieferungen über die Schüler des Isocrates’ – Orth, (2003), 175–94.Google Scholar
Erbì, M. (2008) ‘Demostene nella Retorica di Filodemo: L’Immagine del ῥήτωρ ἔμπρακτος’ – Cronache Ercolanesi (38), 193–219.Google Scholar
Erbì, M. (2012) ‘Nuove letture in P.Herc. 1004 col. 58.’ – Schubert, (2012), 205–11.Google Scholar
Erbse, H. (1971) ‘Platons Urteil über Isocrates’ – Hermes (99), 183–97.Google Scholar
Erskine, A. and Llewellyn-Jones, L. (eds.) (2011) Creating a Hellenistic World. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales.Google Scholar
Eucken, C. (1983) Isocrates: Seine Positionen in der Auseinandersetzung mit den zeitgenössischen Philosophen. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (2004) The Roman World of Cicero’s De oratore. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ferckel, F. (1937) Lysias und Athen: Des Redners politische Stellung zum Gaststaat. Würzburg: Konrad Triltsch.Google Scholar
Ferrari, G. R. F. (1987) Listening to the Cicadas: A Study of Plato’s Phaedrus. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ferrari, G. R. F. (2010) Sappho’s Gift: The Poet and Her Community. Trans. (from the Italian) B. Acosta-Hughes and L. Prauscello. Ann Arbor: Michigan Classical Press.Google Scholar
Finley, M. I. (1975a) ‘The Heritage of Isocrates’ – Finley (1975b), 193–214.Google Scholar
Finley, M. I. (ed.) (1975b) The Use and Abuse of History. London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
Fish, J. (2011a) ‘Not All Politicians are Sisyphus: What Roman Epicureans were Taught about Politics’ – Fish, and Sanders, (2011b), 72–104.Google Scholar
Fish, J. and Sanders, K. R. (eds.) (2011b) Epicurus and the Epicurean Tradition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Flashar, H. (ed.) (1979) Le classicisme à Rome, aux 1ers siècles avant et après J.-C.: Neuf exposés suivis de discussions. Entretiens sur l’antiquité classique (25). Geneva: Fondation Hardt.Google Scholar
Flower, M. A. (1994) Theopompus of Chios: History and Rhetoric in the Fourth Century BC. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Focke, F. (1923) ‘Synkrisis’ – Hermes (58), 327–68.Google Scholar
Ford, A. L. (2002) The Origins of Criticism: Literary Culture and Poetic Theory in Classical Greece. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ford, A. L. (2010) ‘Σωκρατικοὶ λόγοι in Aristotle and Fourth-Century Theories of Genre’ – Classical Philology (105), 221–35.Google Scholar
Forster, E. S. (1979) Isocrates: Cyprian Orations: Evagoras, ad Nicoclem, Nikokles. New York: Arno Press.Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. W. (2005) Theophrastus of Eresus: Sources for His Life, Writings, Thought, and Influence. Commentary, vol. viii. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. W. (ed.) (1992) Theophrastus of Eresus: Sources for His Life, Writings, Thought, and Influence. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. W., Huby, P. M. and Long, A. A. (eds.) (1985) Theophrastus of Eresus: On His Life And Work. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. W. and Mirhady, D. C. (eds.) (1994) Peripatetic Rhetoric after Aristotle. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. W. and White, S. A. (eds.) (2004) Lyco of Troas and Hieronymus of Rhodes: Text, Translation, and Discussion. New Brunswick, NJ, and London: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. W. and White, S. A. (2006) Aristo of Ceos: Text, Translation and Discussion. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Fox, M. (2009) ‘Heraclides of Pontus and the Philosophical Dialogue’ – Heraclides of Pontus: Discussion, ed. Fortenbaugh, W. W. and Pender, E. (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers), 41–67.Google Scholar
Fox, M. (2011) ‘The Style of the Past: Dionysius of Halicarnassus in Context’ – Schmitz, and Wiater, (2011), 93–114.Google Scholar
Friemann, S. (1990) ‘Überlegungen zu Alkidamas’ Rede über den Sophisten’ – Der Übergang von der Mündlichkeit zur Literatur bei den Griechen, ed. Kullmann, W. et al. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Gabba, E. (1982) ‘Political and Cultural Aspects of the Classicistic Revival in the Augustan Age’ – Classical Antiquity (1), 43–65.Google Scholar
Gaines, R. (2001) ‘Philodemus and Cicero on Models of Rhetorical Expression’ – Auvray-Assayas, and Delattre, (2001), 259–72.Google Scholar
Gaines, R. (2004) ‘Cicero, Philodemus and the Development of Late Hellenistic Rhetorical Theory’ – Philodemus and the New Testament World, ed. Fitzgerald, J. T.. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Gaines, R. (2005) ‘De-canonizing Ancient Rhetoric’ – Graff, et al. (2005), 61–73.Google Scholar
Garver, E. (1994) Aristotle’s Rhetoric: An Art of Character. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Geffcken, J. (1933) ‘Das Rätsel des “Kleitophon”’ – Hermes (68), 429–39.Google Scholar
Gelzer, T. (1979) ‘Klassizismus, Attizismus und Asianismus’ – Flashar (1979), 1–41.Google Scholar
Gerber, D. E. (1982) Pindar’s Olympian One: A Commentary. University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Giannopoulou, Z. (2013) Plato’s Theaetetus as a Second Apology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gifford, E. H. (1905) The Euthydemus of Plato. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gigante, M. (1995) Philodemus in Italy: The Books from Herculaneum. Trans. D. Obbink. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Gigon, O. (1987) Aristotelis opera. Volumen tertium: librorum deperditorum fragmenta. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I. (2007) Paideia romana: Cicero’s Tusculan Disputations. Cambridge Philological Society (30). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (2002) The Invention of Prose. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (ed.) (2008) The End of Dialogue in Antiquity. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goold, G. P. (1961) ‘A Greek Professorial Circle at Rome’ – TAPA (92), 168–92.Google Scholar
Gordon, J. (1999) Turning toward Philosophy: Literary Device and Dramatic Structure in Plato’s Dialogues. Philadelphia: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Görler, W. (1988) ‘From Athens to Tusculum: Gleaning the Background of Cicero’s De oratore’ – Rhetorica (6), 215–35.Google Scholar
Gotschlich, E. (1871) Über die Veranlassung des platonischen Dialoges Gorgias und die Polemik in demselben. Beuthen.Google Scholar
Gottschalk, H. B. (1980) Heraclides of Pontus. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Goudriaan, K. (1989) Over classicisme: Dionysius van Haliearnassus en zijn program van welsprekendheid, cultuur en politiek. Dissertation: Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Graff, R. (2005) ‘Prose versus Poetry in Early Greek Theories of Style’ – Rhetorica (23), 303–35.Google Scholar
Graff, R. and Leff, M. (2005) ‘Revisionist Historiography and Rhetorical Tradition(s)’ – Graff, et al. (2005), 11–30.Google Scholar
Graff, R., Walzer, A. E. and Mailloux, S. (eds.) (2005) The Viability of the Rhetorical Tradition. State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Graham, A. J. (2007) ‘Plato’s Anachronisms’ – Corolla Cosmo Rodewald, ed. Sekunda, N.. Gdańsk: Foundation for the Development of Gdańsk University.Google Scholar
Gray, V. (1994) ‘Images of Sparta: Writer and Audience in Isocrates’ Panathenaicus’ – Powell, and Hodkinson, (1994), 223–71.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, M. (1990) What is Classicism? London: Academy Editions.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. T. (1989) ‘Philosophy, Politics, and Politicians’ – Griffin, and Barnes, (1989), 1–37.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. T. (2001) ‘Piso, Cicero and Their Audience’ – Auvray-Assayas, and Delattre, (2001), 85–99.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. T. and Barnes, J. (eds.) (1989) Philosophia togata: Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society 1. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Griswold, C. J. (1986) Self-Knowledge in Plato's Phaedrus. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Grube, G. M. A. (1961) A Greek Critic: Demetrius on Style. University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. K. C. (1986) A History of Greek Philosophy, vol. iv: Plato: The Man and His Dialogues: Earlier Period. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hagen, H. M. (1966) Ethopoiia: Zur Geschichte eines rhetorischen Begriffs. Dissertation: Erlangen.Google Scholar
Hägg, T. (2012) The Art of Biography in Antiquity. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, E. (2013) ‘Rhetorical Actors and Other Versatile Hellenistic Vocalists’ – Kremmydas, and Tempest, (2013), 109–36.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. F. (1990) ‘Traditional Greek Conceptions of Character’ – Pelling, (1990), 32–59.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. F. (1993) Plato: Republic 5. Warminster: Aris & Philips.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. F. (1994) ‘Philosophy and Rhetoric’ – Worthington, (1994b), 222–43.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. F. (1996) ‘The Challenge of Rhetoric to Political and Ethical Theory in Aristotle’ – Oksenberg Rorty, (1996), 175–90.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. F. (1997) ‘Philosophical Rhetoric or Rhetorical Philosophy? The Strange Case of Isocrates’ – Schildgen, (1997), 107–25.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. F. (2002) The Aesthetics of Mimesis: Ancient Texts and Modern Problems. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. F. (2006) Review of Isocrates and Civic Education, ed. T. Poulakos and D. Depew – Classical Review (56), 36–7.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. F. (2011) Between Ecstasy and Truth: Interpretations of Greek Poetics from Homer to Longinus. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hansen, M. H. (1983) ‘The Athenian “Politicians”, 403-322 BCE’ – Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies (24), 33–55.Google Scholar
Harding, P. (1973) ‘The Purpose of Isocrates’ Archidamos and On the Peace’ – California Studies in Classical Antiquity (6), 137–49.Google Scholar
Harding, P. (2000) ‘Demosthenes in the Underworld: A Chapter in the Nachleben of a Rhētōr’ – Worthington, (2000), 246–71.Google Scholar
Harding, P. (2008) The Story of Athens: The Fragments of the Local Chronicles of Attika. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harris, E. M. (2013) ‘How to Address the Athenian Assembly: Rhetoric and Political Tactics in the Debate about Mytilene (Thuc. 3.37–50)’ – CQ (63), 94–109.Google Scholar
Harrison, J. R. (2003) Paul’s Language of Grace in Its Graeco-Roman Context. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Haskins, E. V. (2004) Logos and Power in Isocrates and Aristotle. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Haslam, M. W. (1972) ‘Plato, Sophron and the Dramatic Dialogue’ – Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, University of London (19), 17–38.Google Scholar
Hatzimichali, M. (2011) Potamo of Alexandria and the Emergence of Eclecticism in Late Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hauser, G. A. (2004) ‘Teaching Rhetoric: Or Why Rhetoric Isn’t Just Another Kind of Philosophy or Literary Criticism’ – Rhetoric Society Quarterly (34/3), 39–53.Google Scholar
Hawtrey, R. S. W. (1981) Commentary on Plato’s Euthydemus. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
Heath, M. (1998) ‘Caecilius, Longinus, and Photius’ – GRBS (39), 271–92.Google Scholar
Heilbrunn, G. (1975) ‘Isocrates on Rhetoric and Power’ – Hermes (103), 154–78.Google Scholar
Helmbold, W. C. and O’Neil, E. N. (1959) Plutarch’s Quotations. Baltimore, MD: American Philological Association.Google Scholar
Hendrickson, G. L. (1904) ‘The Peripatetic Mean of Style and the Three Stylistic Characters’ – AJP (25), 125–46.Google Scholar
Herrmann, F.-G. (ed.) (2006) New Essays on Plato: Language and Thought in Fourth-Century Greek Philosophy. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales.Google Scholar
Hessler, J. E. (2018) ‘Socratic Protreptic and Epicurus: Healing through Philosophy’ – Stavru, and Moore, (2018), 665–81.Google Scholar
Hicks, R. D. (1950) Diogenes Laertius: Lives of Eminent Philosophers. Loeb Classical Library. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Hidber, T. (1996) Das klassizistische Manifest des Dionys von Halikarnass: Die Praefatio zu ‘De oratoribus veteribus’: Einleitung, Übersetzung und Kommentar. Stuttgart: Teubner.Google Scholar
Hirzel, R. (1895) Der Dialog: Ein literaturhistorischer Versuch. Leipzig: Hirzel.Google Scholar
Hordern, J. H. (2004) Sophron’s Mimes: Text, Translation, and Commentary. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Horn, Ch., Müller, J. and Söder, J. (eds.) (2009) Platon-Handbuch: Leben-Werk-Wirkung. Stuttgart: Metzler.Google Scholar
Hose, M. (1999) ‘Die zweite Begegnung Roms mit den Griechen, oder: Zu politischen Ursachen des Attizismus’ – Vogt Spira, and Rommel, (1999), 274–88.Google Scholar
Howland, J. (2004) ‘Plato’s Reply to Lysias: Republic 1 and 2 and Against Eratosthenes’ – AJP (125), 179–208.Google Scholar
Howland, R. L. (1937) ‘The Attack on Isocrates in the Phaedrus’ – CQ (31), 151–59.Google Scholar
Hubbell, H. M. (1913) The Influence of Isocrates on Cicero, Dionysius and Aristides. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hubbell, H. M. (1916) ‘Isocrates and the Epicureans’ – Classical Philology (11), 405–18.Google Scholar
Hubbell, H. M. (1966) ‘Cicero on Styles of Oratory’ – Yale Classical Studies (19), 171–86.Google Scholar
Hudson-Williams, H. L. (1985) Review of Isocrates: Seine Positionen in der Auseinandersetzung mit den zeitgenössischen Philosophen, Christoph Eucken – Classical Review (35), 20–1.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. (2004) Plato’s Symposium. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. (2006) The Shadow of Callimachus: Studies in the Reception of Hellenistic Poetry at Rome. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. (2007) ‘Sappho and Latin Poetry’ – Bastianini, and Casanova, (2007), 213–25.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. (2009) Critical Moments in Classical Literature: Studies in the Ancient View of Literature and Its Uses. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. (2011) ‘The Gods of Callimachus’ – Acosta-Hughes, et al. (2011), 245–63.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. (2012) Plato and the Traditions of Ancient Literature: The Silent Stream. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. (2014) Hesiodic Voices: Studies in the Ancient Reception of Hesiod’s Works and Days. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, D. S. and Johnson, M. R. (2005) ‘Authenticating Aristotle’s Protrepticus’ – Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy (29), 193–294.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, D. S. and Johnson, M. R. (2010) ‘The Antidosis of Isocrates and Aristotle’s Protrepticus.’ Accessed online: https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B432Ae6vnCJNZDU5OTMxZjQtZjkyZS00Y2RmLThlNDUtZTE2YTFjZDgxMmY1/edit?hl=en_US&pli=1.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, D. S. and Johnson, M. R. (2015) Aristotle: Protrepticus. Accessed online: http://www.protrepticus.info/protreprecon2015i20.pdf (last accessed 25 May 2015).Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. (1988) Hellenistic Poetry. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Indelli, G. (1994) ‘References to Isocrates in PHerc. 1007 (Philodemus, Rhetorica IV)’ – Bülow-Jacobsen, (1994), 361–6.Google Scholar
Indelli, G. (2000) ‘I papyri di Lisia: Alcune osservazioni’ – Papyrologica Lupiensia (9), 197–204.Google Scholar
Innes, D. C. (1985) ‘Theophrastus and the Theory of Style’ – Fortenbaugh, et al. (1985), 251–67.Google Scholar
Innes, D. C. (1994) ‘Period and Colon: Theory and Example in Demetrius and Longinus’ – Fortenbaugh, and Mirhady, (1994), 36–53.Google Scholar
Innes, D. C. (1995) Demetrius: On Style. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Innes, D. C. (2002) ‘Longinus and Caecilius: Models of the Sublime’ – Mnemosyne (55), 259–84.Google Scholar
Irwin, T. (1995) Plato’s Ethics. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaeger, W. (1939) Paideia: The Ideals of Greek Culture. Vol i. Trans. G. Highet. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jaeger, W. (1944) Paideia: The Ideals of Greek Culture. Vol ii. Trans. G. Highet. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jaeger, W. (1945) Paideia: The Ideals of Greek Culture. Vol iii. Trans. G. Highet. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jaeger, W. (1948) Aristotle: Fundamentals of the History of His Development. 2nd edn. Trans. Robinson, R.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jahn, O. (1908) Cicero Brutus. 5th edn, ed. Kroll, W.. Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Janko, R. (2000) Philodemus: On Poems: Book 1. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Janko, R. (2006) ‘Socrates the Freethinker’ – The Blackwell Companion to Socrates, ed. Ahbel-Rappe, S. and Kamtekar, R. (Oxford: Blackwell), 48–62.Google Scholar
Jebb, R. C. (1876) The Attic Orators from Antiphon to Isaeos. 2 vols. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Johnson, R. (1957) ‘A Note on the Number of Isocrates’ Pupils’ – AJP (78), 297–300.Google Scholar
Jordan, M. D. (1986) ‘Ancient Philosophic Protreptic and the Problem of Persuasive Genres’ – Rhetorica (4), 309–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, C. H. (1996) Plato and the Socratic Dialogue: The Philosophical Use of a Literary Form. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kassel, R. (1976) Aristotelis Ars rhetorica. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Keaney, J. J. (1991) Harpocration: Lexeis of the Ten Orators. Amsterdam: A. M. Hakkert.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. A. (1963) Art of Persuasion in Greece. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. A. (1970) Review of Lysias and the Corpus Lysiacum by K. J. Dover – AJP (91/4), 495–7.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. A. (1972) The Art of Rhetoric in the Roman World: 300 B.C. – A.D. 300. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. A. (1980) Classical Rhetoric and Its Christian and Secular Tradition from Ancient to Modern Times. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. A. (1991) Aristotle: On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ker, J. and Pieper, C. (eds.) (2014) Valuing the Past in the Greco-Roman World. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Kerferd, G. B. (1950) ‘The First Greek Sophists’ – Classical Review (64), 8–10.Google Scholar
Kerferd, G. B. (1981) The Sophistic Movement. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kim, L. (2014) ‘Archaizing and Classicism in the Literary Historical Thinking of Dionysius of Halicarnassus’ – Ker, and Pieper, (2014), 357–87.Google Scholar
Knögel, W. (1933) Der Peripatetiker Ariston von Keos bei Philodem. Leipzig: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Knox, P. E. (2011) ‘Cicero as a Hellenistic Poet’ – CQ (61), 192–204.Google Scholar
Kremmydas, C. (2013) ‘Hellenistic Oratory and the Evidence of Rhetorical Exercises’ – Kremmydas, and Tempest, (2013), 139–63.Google Scholar
Kremmydas, C. and Tempest, K. (eds.) (2013) Hellenstic Oratory: Continuity and Change. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kröner, H. O. (1976) ‘Dialog und Rede: Zur Deutung des Isokrateischen Panathenaicus’ – Seck, (1976), 296–328.Google Scholar
Laistner, M. L. W. (1927) Isocrates: De Pace and Philippus. New York and London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Lamb, W. R. M. (1924) Plato: Laches, Protagoras, Meno, Euthydemus. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Laplace, M. (1995) ‘Platon et l’art d’écrire des discours: Critique de Lysias et d’Isocrate, influence sur Denys d’Halicarnasse’ – Rhetorica (13), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laqueur, R. (1911) ‘Ephoros. 2. Die Disposition’ – Hermes (46), 321–54.Google Scholar
Latacz, J. (1966) Zum Wortfeld ‘Freude’ in der Sprache Homers. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Lateiner, D. (1981) ‘An Analysis of Lysias’ Political Defense Speeches’ – Rivista storica dell’Antiquità (11), 147–60.Google Scholar
Laughton, E. (1961) ‘Cicero and the Greek Orators’ – AJP (82/1), 27–49.Google Scholar
Lebel, M. (1973) ‘Évolution de la doctrine de Denys d’Halicarnasse du De Lysia aux De compositione uerborum et De Demosthene II’ – Cahiers des études anciennes (2), 79–88.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, M. (2012) The Lives of the Greek Poets. 2nd edn. London: Bristol Classical Press.Google Scholar
Leftwich, G. V. (1987) Ancient Conceptions of the Body and the Canon of Polykleitos. Dissertation: Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Leigh, M. (2004) ‘Quintilian on the Emotions’ – Journal of Roman Studies (94), 122–40.Google Scholar
Levene, D. S. (2010) Livy on the Hannibalic War. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Livingstone, N. (1998) ‘The Voice of Isocrates and the Dissemination of Cultural Power’ – Too, and Livingstone, (1998), 263–81.Google Scholar
Livingstone, N. (2001) A Commentary on Isocrates’ Busiris. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Loening, T. C. (1981) ‘The Autobiographical Speeches of Lysias and the Biographical Tradition’ – Hermes (109), 280–94.Google Scholar
Loening, T. C. (1987) The Reconciliation Agreement of 403/402 BC in Athens: Its Content and Application. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Long, A. G. (2008) ‘Plato’s Dialogues and a Common Rationale for Dialogue form’ – Goldhill, (2008), 45–59.Google Scholar
Long, A. G. (2018) ‘Sophists, Epicureans and Stoics’ – Canevaro, and Gray, (2018), 93–108.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1986) Hellenistic Philosophy: Stoics, Epicureans, Sceptics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (ed.) (1999) The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
López Cruces, J. L. and Fuentes González, P. P. (2000) ‘Isocrate d’Athènes’ –Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques, vol. iii: D'Eccélos à Juvénal, ed. Goulet, R. (Paris: CNRS), 891–938.Google Scholar
Loraux, N. (1981) L’invention d’Athènes: Histoire de l’oraison funèbre dans la ‘cité classique’. Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
Lossau, M. J. (1964) Untersuchungen zur antiken Demosthenesexegese. Bad Homburg: Dr. Max Gehlen.Google Scholar
Luraghi, N. (2003) ‘Dionysios von Halikarnassos zwischen Griechen und Römern’ – Formen römischer Geschichtsschreibung von den Anfängen bis Livius: Gattungen – Autoren – Kontexte, ed. Eigler, U., Gotter, U., Luraghi, N. and Walter, U. (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft), 268–86.Google Scholar
MacDowell, D. M. (1988) Review of Palatinus Graecus 88 and the Manuscript Tradition of Lysias, M. L. Sosower – Classical Review (38), 403–4.Google Scholar
MacDowell, D. M. (2009) Demosthenes the Orator. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
MacEwen, I. K. (2003) Vitruvius: Writing the Body of Architecture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
MacLachlan, B. (1993) The Age of Grace: Charis in Early Greek Poetry. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mandilaras, V. G. (2003) Isocrates: Opera omnia. Vols i–iii. Bibliotheca Teubneriana. Munich and Leipzig: K. G. Saur.Google Scholar
Marincola, J. (2014) ‘Rethinking Isocrates and Historiography’ – Between Thucydides and Polybius: The Golden Age of Greek Historiography, ed. Parmeggiani, G. (Washington, DC: Center for Hellenic Studies).Google Scholar
Marini, N. (2007) Demetrio, Lo Stile. Rome: Edizioni di storia e letteratura.Google Scholar
Mariß, R. (2002) Alkidamas: Über diejenigen, die schriftliche Reden schreiben, oder über die Sophisten. Eine Sophistenrede aus dem 4. Jahrhundert v. Chr. Münster: Aschendorff.Google Scholar
Marrou, H.-I. (1965) Histoire de l’éducation dans l’antiquité. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Martin, G. (2018a) ‘Introduction’ – Martin (2018b), 1–4.Google Scholar
Martin, G. (ed.) (2018b) The Oxford Handbook of Demosthenes. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mathieu, G. and Brémond, É. (eds.) (1928–62) Isocrate: Discours. 4 vols. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Matijašić, I. (2018) Shaping the Canons of Ancient Greek Historiography: Imitation, Classicism, and Literary Criticism. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, J. M. and Wisse, J. (eds.) (2001) Cicero: On the Ideal Orator (De Oratore). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mayhew, R. (2011) Prodicus the Sophist: Texts, Translations, and Commentary. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McCabe, M. M. (1994) ‘Arguments in Context: Aristotle’s Defense of Rhetoric’ – Aristotle’s Rhetoric: Philosophical Essays, ed. Furley, D. J. and Nehamas, A. (Princeton University Press), 129–65.Google Scholar
McCoy, M. (2007) Plato on the Rhetoric of Philosophers and Sophists. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McDonald, J. M. S. (1931) Character-Portraiture in Epicharmus, Sophron, and Plato. Sewanee, TN: University Press.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. (1973) Plato: Theaetetus. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Medda, E. (2003) Lysiae in Hippothersem, In Theomnestum, et fragmenta ex incertis orationibus (P.Oxy. XIII 1606). Florence: F. Le Monnier.Google Scholar
Mejer, J. (1981) ‘Demetrius of Magnesia: On Poets and Authors of the Same Name’ – Hermes (109), 447–72.Google Scholar
Michelini, A. N. (2000) ‘Socrates Plays the Buffoon: Cautionary Protreptic in Euthydemus’ – AJP (121), 509–35.Google Scholar
Miller, P. A. (1994) Lyric Texts and Lyric Consciousness: The Birth of a Genre from Archaic Greece to Augustan Rome. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mirhady, D. (2004) ‘Hieronymus on Isocrates’ Style’ – Fortenbaugh, and White, (2004), 443–56.Google Scholar
Mirhady, D. and Too, Y. L. (2000) Isocrates I. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Misch, G. (1950) A History of Autobiography in Antiquity. Vol. i. Trans. E. W. Dickes. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mitsis, P. and Tsagalis, C. (eds.) (2010) Allusion, Authority, and Truth: Critical Perspectives on Greek Poetic and Rhetorical Texts. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Momigliano, A. (1941) ‘Epicureans in Revolt’ – Journal of Roman Studies (31) 149–57.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. (1971) The Development of Greek Biography: Four Lectures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, K. (2004) ‘The Education of Athens: Politics and Rhetoric in Isocrates and Plato’ – Poulakos, and Depew, (2004), 125–54.Google Scholar
Morgan, T. (1998) Literate Education in the Hellenistic and Roman Worlds. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Most, G. W. (2006) Hesiod: Theogony; Works and Days; Testimonia. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Moussy, C. (1966) Gratia et sa famille. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Muir, J. V. (2001) Alcidamas: The Works & Fragments. London: Bristol Classical Press.Google Scholar
Muir, J. R. (2019) The Legacy of Isocrates and a Platonic Alternative: Political Philosophy and the Value of Education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Müller, C. W. (1975) Die Kurzdialoge der Appendix Platonica: Philologische Beiträge zur nachplatonischen Sokratik. Munich: Fink.Google Scholar
Murphy, D. J. (2013) ‘Isocrates and the Dialogue’ – Classical World (106), 311–53.Google Scholar
Nails, D. (2002) The People of Plato: A Prosopography of Plato and Other Socratics. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Natoli, A. F. (2004) The Letter of Speusippus to Philip II. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Nichols, M. F. (2009) Vitruvius and the Rhetoric of Display: Wall Painting, Domestic Architecture and Roman Self-Fashioning. Dissertation: University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Nicolai, R. (2004) Studi su Isocrate: La comunicazione letteraria nel IV sec. a.C. e i nuovi generi della prosa. Rome: Quasar.Google Scholar
Nightingale, A. W. (1995) Genres in Dialogue: Plato and the Construct of Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nightingale, A. W. (2004) Spectacles of Truth in Classical Greek Philosophy: Theoria in Its Cultural Context. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Norden, E. (1898) Die antike Kunstprosa: Vom VI. Jahrhundert v. Chr. bis in die Zeit der Renaissance. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Norlin, G. (1966) Isocrates. Volume I. London: Heinemann and Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Norlin, G. (1968) Isocrates. Volume II. London: Heinemann and Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (1986a) The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (ed.) (1986b) Logic, Science and Dialectic: Collected Papers of G. E. L. Owen. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Obbink, D. (2005) ‘Lysias 4715–4716’ – The Oxyrhynchus Papyri (69), 104–15.Google Scholar
Ober, J. (1998) Political Dissent in Democratic Athens: Intellectual Critics of Popular Rule. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ober, J. (2004) ‘I, Socrates… The Performative Audacity of Isocrates’ Antidosis’ – Depew, and Poulakos, (2004), 21–43.Google Scholar
Ofenloch, E. (1907) Caecilii Calactini Fragmenta. [1967 reprint.] Stuttgart: Teubner.Google Scholar
O’Gorman, N. (2006) Review of The Viability of the Rhetorical Tradition, ed. Graff, R., Walzer, A. E. and Atwill, J. M. (State University of New York Press, 2005) in Rhetorical Society Quarterly (36), 107–13.Google Scholar
Oksenberg Rorty, A. (ed.) (1996) Essays on Aristotle’s Rhetoric. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Orth, W. (ed.) (2003) Isocrates: Neue Ansätze zur Bewertung eines politischen Schriftstellers. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.Google Scholar
Orwin, C. (1987) ‘Cleitophon’ – Pangle, (1987), 117–31.Google Scholar
Osborne, R. (2000) ‘Fourth Century: The Political and Military Narrative’ – Classical Greece 500–323 BCE, ed. Osborne, R. (Oxford University Press), 197–222.Google Scholar
Ostwald, M. (1986) From Popular Sovereignity to the Sovereignity of Law. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ostwald, M. and Lynch, J. P. (1994) ‘The Growth of Schools and the Advance of Knowledge’ – The Cambridge Ancient History, vol. vi: The Fourth Century B.C. ed. Lewis, D., Boardman, J., Hornblower, S. and Ostwald, M. (Cambridge University Press), 592–633.Google Scholar
O’Sullivan, N. (1992) Alcidamas, Aristophanes, and the Beginnings of Greek Stylistic Theory. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
O’Sullivan, N. (1996) ‘Written and Spoken in the First Sophistic’ – Worthington, (1996), 115–28.Google Scholar
O’Sullivan, N. (1997) ‘Caecilius, the “canons” of writers, and the origins of Atticism’ –Dominik, (1997), 32–49.Google Scholar
Overbeck, J. A. (1868) Die antiken Schriftquellen zur Geschichte der bildenden Künste bei den Griechen. Leipzig: Engelmann.Google Scholar
Owen, G. E. L. (1986) ‘Tithenai ta phainomena’ – Nussbaum, (1986b), 239–51.Google Scholar
Palpacelli, L. (2009) L’Eutidemo di Platone: Una commedia straordinariamente seria. Milan: V&P.Google Scholar
Pangle, T. L. (ed.) (1987) The roots of political philosophy: ten forgotten Socratic dialogues translated, with interpretive studies. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Papillon, T. L. (1995) ‘Isocrates’ techne and Rhetorical Pedagogy’ – Rhetoric Society Quarterly (25), 149–63.Google Scholar
Papillon, T. L. (1996) ‘Isocrates on Gorgias and Helen: The Unity of the “Helen”’ –Classical Journal (91), 377–91.Google Scholar
Papillon, T. L. (1998) ‘Isocrates and the Greek Poetic Tradition’ – Scholia (7), 41–61.Google Scholar
Papillon, T. L. (2004) Isocrates II. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. (2018) ‘Dionysius on Regime Change’ – Hunter, and de Jonge, (2018), 203–20.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. (ed.) (1990) Characterization and Individuality in Greek Literature. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Peterson, S. (2011) Socrates and Philosophy in the Dialogues of Plato. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, R. (1968) History of Classical Scholarship: From the Beginnings to the End of the Hellenistic Age. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pfister, F. (1933) ‘Isocrates und die spätere Gliederung der Narratio’ – Hermes (68), 457–60.Google Scholar
Pitcher, L. V. (2005) ‘Narrative Technique in The Lives of the Ten Orators’ – CQ (55), 217–34.Google Scholar
Platt, H. F. (2010) Literary Rhetoric: Concepts – Structures – Analyses. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Politis, V. (2015) The Structure of Enquiry in Plato’s Early Dialogues. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pollitt, J. J. (1965) The Art of Ancient Greece: Sources and Documents. 2nd edn 1990. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pollitt, J. J. (1974) The Ancient View of Greek Art: Criticism, History, and Terminology. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Porter, J. I. (1995) ‘Οἱ κριτικοί: A Reassessment’ – Abbenes, et al. (1995), 83–109.Google Scholar
Porter, J. I. (2006a) ‘What is “Classical” about Classical Antiquity’ – Porter, (2006b), 1–65.Google Scholar
Porter, J. I. (2010) The Origins of Aesthetic Thought in Ancient Greece. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Porter, J. I. (2011) ‘Against λεπτότης: Rethinking Hellenistic Aesthetics’ – Erskine, and Llewellyn-Jones, (2011), 271–312.Google Scholar
Porter, J. I. (2015) ‘The Sublime’ – Destrée, and Murray, (2015), 393–405.Google Scholar
Porter, J. I. (ed.) (2006b) Classical Pasts: The Classical Traditions of Greece and Rome. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Poulakos, J. (2004) ‘Rhetoric and Civic Education: From the Sophists to Isocrates’ – Depew, and Poulakos, (2004), 69–83.Google Scholar
Poulakos, T. (1997) Speaking for the Polis: Isocrates’ Rhetorical Education. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Poulakos, T. (2001) ‘Isocrates’ Use of Doxa’ – Philosophy and Rhetoric (34), 61–78.Google Scholar
Poulakos, T. (2004) ‘Isocrates’ Civic Education and the Question of Doxa’ –Depew, and Poulakos, (2004), 44–65.Google Scholar
Poulakos, T. and Depew, D. (eds.) (2004) Isocrates and Civic Education. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Powell, A. and Hodkinson, S. (eds.) (1994) The Shadow of Sparta. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Press, G. A. (1993a) ‘Principles of Dramatic and Non-Dogmatic Plato Interpretation’ – Press (1993b), 107–27.Google Scholar
Press, G. A. (ed.) (1993b) Plato’s Dialogues: New Studies and Interpretations. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Pritchett, W. K. (1975) Dionysius of Halicarnassus: On Thucydides. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Rabe, H. (1893) Die Zeitfolge der rhetorischen Schriften des Dionys von Halicarnass’ – Rheinisches Museum (48), 147–51.Google Scholar
Rabinowitz, W. G. (1957) Aristotle’s Protrepticus and the Sources of Its Reconstruction. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Race, W. H. (1987) ‘Pindaric Encomium and Isocrates’ Evagoras’ – TAPA (117), 131–55.Google Scholar
Race, W. H. (1997) Pindar: Olympian Odes; Pythian Odes. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rackham, H. (1968) Cicero in Twenty-Eight Volumes. IV: De oratore Book III; De fato; Paradoxa stoicorum; De partitione oratoria. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Radermacher, L. (1921) Aristophanes’ ‘Frösche’. Vienna: A. Hölder.Google Scholar
Radermacher, L. (1951) Artium Scriptores: Reste der voraristotelischen Rhetorik. Vienna: Rohrer.Google Scholar
Reid, R. S. (1996) ‘Dionysius of Halicarnassus’ Theory of Compositional Style and the Theory of Literate Consciousness’ – Rhetoric Review (15), 46–64.Google Scholar
Reid, R. S. (1997) ‘“Neither oratory nor dialogue”: Dionysius of Halicarnassus and the Genre of Plato’s Apology’ – Rhetoric Society Quarterly (27), 63–90.Google Scholar
Ries, K. (1959) Isocrates und Platon im Ringen um die Philosophia. Dissertation: Munich.Google Scholar
Riginos, A. S. (1976) Platonica: The Anecdotes Concerning the Life and Writings of Plato. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Rist, J. M. (1964) ‘Demetrius the Stylist and Artemon the Compiler’ – Phoenix (18), 2–8.Google Scholar
Roberts, W. Rhys (1897a) ‘Caecilius of Calacte’ – AJP (18), 302–12.Google Scholar
Roberts, W. Rhys (1897b) ‘The Literary Circle of Dionysius of Halicarnassus’ – Classical Review (14), 439–42.Google Scholar
Roberts, W. Rhys (1901) Dionysius of Halicarnassus: The three literary letters: Ep. ad Ammaeum I, Ep. ad Pompeium, Ep. ad Ammaeum II. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roisman, J., Worthington, I. and Waterfield, R. (2015) Lives of the Attic Orators: Texts from Pseudo-Plutarch, Photius, and the Suda. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Roochnik, D. (1996) Of Art and Wisdom: Plato’s Understanding of Techne. Philadelphia: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Roser, C. N. (2019) The Epistemic Value of Logos: Gorgias, Isocrates and Plato on the Possibility of Giving Reasons to Others. Dissertation: Humboldt Universität zu Berlin.Google Scholar
Rosillo López, C. (2010) ‘Praising Caesar: Towards the Construction of an Autocratic Ruler’s Image between the Roman Republic and the Empire’ – Covino, and Smith, (2010), 181–98.Google Scholar
Roskam, G. (2007) Live Unnoticed: Λάθε βιώσας. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Ross, D. (1995) Aristotle. 6th‑edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rossetti, L. (2018) ‘Philosopher Socrates? Philosophy at the Time of Socrates and the Reformed Philosophia of Plato’ – Stavru, and Moore, (2018), 265–98.Google Scholar
Roth, P. (2003) Der Panathenaicus des Isocrates: Übersetzung und Kommentar. Munich: K. G. Saur.Google Scholar
Rouse, W. H. D. (1924) Lucretius: De rerum natura. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rowe, C. J. (1998) Plato: Symposium. Warminster: Aris & Philips.Google Scholar
Rowe, C. J. (2000) ‘Cleitophon and Minos’ – Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Political Thought, ed. Rowe, C. J., Schofield, M., Harrison, S. and Lane, M. (Cambridge University Press), 303–9.Google Scholar
Rubinstein, L. (2000) Litigation and Cooperation: Supporting Speakers in the Courts of Classical Athens. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Rue, R. (1993) ‘The Philosopher in Flight: The Digression (172c–177c) in Plato’s Theaetetus’ – Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy (11), 71–100.Google Scholar
Ruffell, I. A. (2011) Politics and Anti-Realism in Athenian Old Comedy: The Art of the Impossible. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. (1981a) Criticism in Antiquity. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. (1981b) ‘Longinus Revisited’ – Mnemosyne (34), 72–86.Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. (1990) ‘Ethos in Oratory and Rhetoric’ – Pelling, (1990), 197–212.Google Scholar
Rutherford, I. (1998) Canons of Style in the Antonine Age: Idea-Theory and Its Literary Context. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Sacks, K. S. (1983) ‘Historiography in the Rhetorical Works of Dionysius of Halicarnassus’ – Athenaeum (61), 65–87.Google Scholar
Sandys, J. E. (1885) M. Tulli Ciceronis Ad Marcum Brutum Orator. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sandys, J. E. (1897) Isocrates: Ad Demonicum et Panegyricus. [1979 reprint.] London: Longmans Green.Google Scholar
Schäublin, C. (1982) ‘Selbstinterpretation im “Panathenaicus” des Isocrates?’ – Museum Helveticum (39), 165–78.Google Scholar
Schenkeveld, D. M. (1964) Studies in Demetrius, On Style. Amsterdam: A. M. Hakkert.Google Scholar
Schenkeveld, D. M. (1968) ‘Οἱ κριτικοί in Philodemus’ – Mnemosyne (21), 176–214.Google Scholar
Schenkeveld, D. M. (1975) ‘Theories of Evaluation in the Rhetorical Works of Dionysius of Halicarnassus’ – Museum Philologum Londiniense (1), 93–107.Google Scholar
Schenkeveld, D. M. (1983) ‘Linguistic Theories in the Rhetorical Works of Dionysius of Halicarnassus’ – Glotta (61), 67–94.Google Scholar
Schenkeveld, D. M. (2000) ‘The Intended Public of Demetrius’s On Style: The Place of the Treatise in the Hellenistic Educational System’ – Rhetorica (18), 29–48.Google Scholar
Schiappa, E. (1990) ‘Did Plato Coin Rhêtorikê?’ – AJP (111), 460–73.Google Scholar
Schiappa, E. (1995) ‘Isocrates’ Philosophia and Contemporary Pragmatism’, Rhetoric, Sophistry, Pragmatism, ed. Mailloux, S. (Cambridge University Press), 33–60.Google Scholar
Schiappa, E. (1999) The Beginnings of Rhetorical Theory in Classical Greece. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Schildgen, B. D. (ed.) (1997) The Rhetoric Canon. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
Schindel, U. (1967) ‘Untersuchungen zur Biographie des Redners Lysias’ – Rheinisches Museum für Philologie (110), 32–52.Google Scholar
Schleiermacher, F. (1836) Schleiermacher’s Introductions to the Dialogues of Plato. Trans. W. Dobson. Cambridge and London: Deigthon & Parker.Google Scholar
Schlikker, F. W. (1940) Hellenistische Vorstellungen von der Schönheit des Bauwerks nach Vitruv. Berlin: Archäologisches Institut des Deutschen Reiches.Google Scholar
Schmid, W. (1887) Der Atticismus in seinen Hauptvertretern: Von Dionysius von Halikarnass bis auf den zweiten Philostratus. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
Schmitz, T. A. and Wiater, N. (eds.) (2011) The Struggle for Identity: Greeks and Their Past in the First Century BCE. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Schneeweiss, G. (2005) Aristoteles: Protreptikos: Hinführung zur Philosophie. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1999) ‘Social and Political Thought’ – Algra, et al. (1999), 739–70.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (2006) Plato: Political Philosophy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (2008) ‘The Ciceronian Dialogue’ – Goldhill, (2008), 63–84.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (ed.) (2013) Aristotle, Plato and Pythagoreanism in the First Century BC: New Directions for Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scholz, P. (1998) Der Philosoph und die Politik: Die Ausbildung der philosophischen Lebensform und die Entwicklung des Verhältnisses von Philosophie und Politik im 4. und 3. Jh. v. Chr. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Schubert, P. (ed.) (2012) Actes du 26e Congrès international de papyrologie. Geneva: Librairie Droz.Google Scholar
Schultze, C. (1986) ‘Dionysius of Halicarnassus and His Audience’ – Past Perspectives: Studies in Greek and Roman Historical Writing, ed. Moxon, I. S., Smart, J. D. and Woodman, A. J. (Cambridge University Press), 121–41.Google Scholar
Schütrumpf, E. (1994) ‘Some Observations on the Introduction to Aristotle’s Rhetoric’ – Aristotle’s Rhetoric: Philosophical Essays, ed. Furley, D. J. and Nehamas, A. (Princeton University Press), 99–116.Google Scholar
Schwarze, S. (1999) ‘Performing φρόνησις: The Case of Isocrates’ Helen’ – Philosophy and Rhetoric (32), 78–95.Google Scholar
Seck, F. (ed.) (1976) Isocrates. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (2003) ‘Philodemus and the Decentralisation of Philosophy’ – Cronache Ercolanesi (33), 31–41.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (2004) The Midwife of Platonism: Text and subtext in Plato’s Theaetetus. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (ed.) (2012) The Philosophy of Antiochus. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Segal, C. (1962) ‘Gorgias and the Psychology of the Logos’ – Harvard Studies in Classical Philology (66), 99–155.Google Scholar
Sermamoglou-Soulmaidi, G. (2014) Playful Philosophy and Serious Sophistry: A Reading of Plato’s ‘Euthydemus’. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (2000) Valerius Maximus: Memorable Doings and Sayings. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Shuckburgh, E. S. (1979) Lysias: Five Speeches. Bristol Classical Press.Google Scholar
Sidwell, K. (2009) Aristophanes the Democrat. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Silk, M., Gildenhard, I. and Barrow, R. (2014) The Classical Tradition: Art, Literature and Thought. Malden MA, Oxford and Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sinclair, R. K. (1988) Democracy and Participation in Athens. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Slings, S. R. (1995) ‘Protreptic in Ancient Theories of Philosophical Literature’ – Abbenes, et al. (1995), 173–92.Google Scholar
Slings, S. R. (1999) Plato: Clitophon. Cambridge Classical Texts. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, R. M. (1992) ‘Photius on the Ten Orators’ – GRBS 33, 159–89Google Scholar
Smith, R. M. (1995) ‘A New Look at the Canon of the Ten Attic Orators’ – Mnemosyne (48), 66–79.Google Scholar
Smith, R. W. (1974) The Art of Rhetoric in Alexandria: Its Theory and Practice in the Ancient World. M. Nijhoff: The Hague.Google Scholar
Snell, B. (1959) Pindarus. Pars prior: Epinicia. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Snell, B. and Maehler, H. (1970) Bacchylides: Carmina cum fragmentis. [post B. Snell edidit H. Maehler.] Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Solmsen, F. (1941a) ‘The Aristotelian Tradition in Ancient Rhetoric I’ – AJP (62/1), 35–50.Google Scholar
Solmsen, F. (1941b) ‘The Aristotelian Tradition in Ancient Rhetoric II’ – AJP (62/2), 169–90.Google Scholar
Sommerstein, A., Halliwell, S., Zimmermann, B. and Henderson, J. (eds.) (1993) Tragedy, Comedy and the Polis: Papers from the Greek Drama Conference, Nottingham, 18–20 July 1990. Bari: Levante editori.Google Scholar
Sosower, M. L. (1987) Palatinus Graecus 88 and the Manuscript Tradition of Lysias. Amsterdam: Hakkert.Google Scholar
Starr, J. and Engberg-Pedersen, T. (eds.) (2004) Early Christian Paraenesis in Context. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Stavru, , A. and Moore, C. (eds.) (2018) Socrates and the Socratic Dialogue. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Steidle, W. (1952) ‘Redekunst und Bildung bei Isocrates’ – Hermes (80), 257–96.Google Scholar
Sudhaus, S. (1889) ‘Zur Zeitbestimmung des Euthydems, des Gorgias, und der Republik’ – Rheinisches Museum für Philologie (44), 52–64.Google Scholar
Sudhaus, S. (1893) ‘Aristoteles in der Beurtheilung des Epikur und Philodem’ – Rheinisches Museum für Philologie (48), 552–64.Google Scholar
Sudhaus, S. (1896) Philodemi Volumina rhetorica. 2 vols. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Swancutt, D. M. (2004) ‘Paraenesis in Light of Protrepsis: Troubling the Typical Dichotomy’ – Starr, and Engberg-Pedersen, (2004), 113–54.Google Scholar
Tanner, J. (2006) The Invention of Art History in Ancient Greece: Religion, Society and Artistic Rationalisation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tarán, L. (1981) Speusippus of Athens: A Critical Study with a Collection of the Related Texts and Commentary. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Tarrant, H. (2000) Plato’s First Interpreters. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (2007) ‘A New Political World’ – Debating the Athenian Cultural Revolution: Art, literature, philosophy and politics 430–380 BC, ed. Osborne, R. (Cambridge University Press), 72–90.Google Scholar
Tigerstedt, E. N. (1965) The Legend of Sparta in Classical Antiquity. Vol. i. Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Timmerman, D. M. (1998) ‘Isocrates’ Competing Conceptualization of Philosophy’ – Philosophy and Rhetoric (31), 145–59.Google Scholar
Todd, S. C. (1990) ‘The Use and Abuse of the Attic Orators’ – Greece & Rome (37), 159–78.Google Scholar
Todd, S. C. (1993) The Shape of Athenian Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Todd, S. C. (2000) Lysias: Translation with Introductions and Notes. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Todd, S. C. (2007) A Commentary on Lysias: Speeches 1–11. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Too, Y. L. (1995) The Rhetoric of Identity in Isocrates. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Too, Y. L. (2008) A Commentary on Isocrates’ Antidosis. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Too, Y. L. and Livingstone, N. (eds.) (1998) Pedagogy and Power: Rhetorics of Classical Learning. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trapp, M. (1990) ‘Plato's Phaedrus in Second-Century Greek Literature’ – Antonine Literature, ed. Russell, D. A. (Oxford University Press), 141–73.Google Scholar
Trevett, J. C. (1990) ‘P.Oxy. 2537 and Isocrates’ Trapeziticus’ – Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik (80), 22–6.Google Scholar
Trevett, J. C. (1996) ‘Aristotle’s Knowledge of Athenian Oratory’ – CQ (46/2), 371–9.Google Scholar
Tritle, L. A. (1988) Phokion the Good. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Tsitsiridis, S. (2013) Beiträge zu den Fragmenten des Klearchos von Soloi. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Tukey, R. H. (1909) ‘The Composition of the De oratoribus antiquis of Dionysius’ – Classical Philology (4), 390–404.Google Scholar
Usener, S. (1994) Isocrates, Platon und ihr Publikum: Hörer und Leser von Literatur im 4. Jahrhundert v. Chr. Tübingen: G. Narr.Google Scholar
Usher, S. (1965) ‘Individual Characterisation in Lysias’ – Eranos (63), 99–119.Google Scholar
Usher, S. (1974) Dionysius of Halicarnassus: Critical Essays I. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Usher, S. (1976) ‘Lysias and His Clients’ – GRBS (17), 31–40.Google Scholar
Usher, S. (1985) Dionysius of Halicarnassus: Critical essays II. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Usher, S. (1989) Review of In Defense of Rhetoric, Vickers, B. (Oxford, 1988) –Classical Review (39), 41–3.Google Scholar
Usher, S. (1990) Isocrates: Panegyricus and To Nicocles. Warminster: Aris and Philips.Google Scholar
Usher, S. (1999) Greek Oratory: Tradition and Originality. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Usher, S. (2004) ‘Lysias for Pleasure?’ – Cairns, and Knox, (2004), 113–21.Google Scholar
van der Meeren, S. (2002) ‘Le protreptique en philosophie: Essai de définition d’un genre’ – Revue des Études Grecques (115), 591–621.Google Scholar
van der Meeren, S. (2011) Aristote: Exhortation à la Philosophie. Le dossier grec. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Van Hook, L. (1986) Isocrates. Volume III. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
van Wyk Cronjé, J. (1986) Dionysius of Halicarnassus: De Demosthene: A Critical Appraisal of the Status Quaestionis… Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Vander Waerdt, P. A. (ed.) (1994) The Socratic Movement. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Vatai, F. L. (1984) Intellectuals in Politics in the Greek World. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Veteikis, T. (2011) ‘References to Isocrates in Aristotle’s Art of Rhetoric’ – Literatūra (53/3), 7–40.Google Scholar
Vickers, B. (1988) In Defense of Rhetoric. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Viidebaum, L. (2018) ‘Dionysius and Lysias’ Charm’ – de Jonge, and Hunter, (2018), 106–24.Google Scholar
Vogt Spira, G. and Rommel, B. (eds.) (1999) Rezeption und Identität: Die kulturelle Auseinandersetzung Roms mit Griechenland als europäisches Paradigma. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Walbank, F. W. (1981) The Hellenistic World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Walberer, G. (1938) Isocrates und Alkidamas. Dissertation: Hamburg.Google Scholar
Walker, J. (2011) The Genuine Teachers of This Art: Rhetorical Education in Antiquity. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. (2008) Rome’s Cultural Revolution. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wardy, R. (1996) The Birth of Rhetoric: Gorgias, Plato and Their Successors. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wareh, T. (2012) Theory and Practice of Life: Isocrates and the Philosophers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Center for Hellenic Studies.Google Scholar
Weaire, G. (2005) ‘Dionysius of Halicarnassus’ Professional Situation and the De Thucydide’ – Phoenix (59), 246–66.Google Scholar
Wehrli, F. (1968) Die Schule des Aristoteles: Texte und Kommentar. Demetrios von Phaleron. Basel: Schwabe.Google Scholar
Wehrli, F. (1969) Die Schule des Aristoteles: Texte und Kommentar. Klearchos. Basel: Schwabe.Google Scholar
Weische, A. (1972) Ciceros Nachahmung der attischen Redner. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Weissenberger, M. (2003) ‘Lysias 1905–2000’ – Lustrum (45), 7–166.Google Scholar
Wersdörfer, H. (1940) Die Philosophia des Isocrates im Spiegel ihrer Terminologie: Untersuchungen zur frühattischen Rhetorik und Stillehre. Dissertation: Leipzig.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (1966) Hesiod: Theogony. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (1978) Hesiod: Works and Days. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Whitehead, D. (2004) ‘Isocrates for Hire: Some Preliminaries to a Commentary on Isocrates 16–21’ – Cairns, and Knox, (2004), 151–85.Google Scholar
Wiater, N. (2011a) The Ideology of Classicism: Language, History, and Identity in Dionysius of Halicarnassus. New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wiater, N. (2011b) ‘Writing Roman History – Shaping Greek Identity: The Ideology of Historiography in Dionysius of Halicarnassus’ – Schmitz, and Wiater, (2011), 61–92.Google Scholar
Wilamowitz-Möllendorff, U. von (1900) ‘Asianismus und Atticismus’ – Hermes (35), 1–52.Google Scholar
Wilcox, S. (1943a) ‘Isocrates’ Genera of Prose’ – AJP (64/4), 427–31.Google Scholar
Wilcox, S. (1943b) ‘Criticisms of Isocrates and His ϕιλοσοϕια’ – TAPA (74), 113–33.Google Scholar
Wilms, H. (1995) Techne und Paideia bei Xenophon und Isocrates. Stuttgart: Teubner.Google Scholar
Wisse, J. (1989) Ethos and Pathos from Aristotle to Cicero. Amsterdam: Hakkert.Google Scholar
Wisse, J. (1995) ‘Greeks, Romans, and the Rise of Atticism’ – Abbenes, et al. (1995), 65–82.Google Scholar
Wisse, J. (2001) ‘Atticists, Academics and Epicureans: Response to Robert Gaines’ – Auvray-Assayas, and Delattre, (2001), 273–82.Google Scholar
Woerther, F. (2013) ‘Propositions pour une nouvelle édition des fragments de Caecilius de Calè-Actè’ – Revue de philologie, de littérature et d’histoire anciennes (87/2), 133–49.Google Scholar
Woerther, F. (2015) Caecilius de Calè-Actè, Fragments et témoignages. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Wolpert, A. and Kapparis, K. (eds.) (2011) Legal Speeches of Democratic Athens: Sources for Athenian History. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Woodruff, P. (1999) ‘Rhetoric and Relativism: Protagoras and Gorgias’ – Long, (1999), 290–310.Google Scholar
Wooten, C. W. (1974) ‘The Speeches in Polybius: An Insight into the Nature of Hellenistic Oratory’ – AJP (95), 235–51.Google Scholar
Wooten, C. W. (1977) ‘Cicero’s Reactions to Demosthenes: A Clarification’ – Classical Journal (73/1), 37–43.Google Scholar
Wooten, C. W. (1994) ‘Peripatetic Tradition in the Literary Essays of Dionysius of Halicarnassus’ – Fortenbaugh, and Mirhady, (1994), 121–30.Google Scholar
Wooten, C. W. (2018) ‘Rhetorical Technique’ – Martin, (2018b), 407–18.Google Scholar
Worthington, I. (1993) ‘Once More, the Client/Logographos Relationship’ – CQ (43/1), 67–72.Google Scholar
Worthington, I. (1994a) ‘The Canon of the Ten Attic Orators’ – Worthington, (1994b), 244–63.Google Scholar
Worthington, I. (2013) Demosthenes of Athens and the Fall of Classical Greece. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Worthington, I. (ed.) (1994b) Persuasion: Greek rhetoric in Action. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Worthington, I. (ed.) (1996) Voice into Text: Orality and Literacy in Ancient Greece. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Worthington, I. (ed.) (2000) Demosthenes: Statesman and Orator. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Xanthakis-Karamanos, G. (1979) ‘The Influence of Rhetoric on Fourth-Century Tragedy’ – CQ (29), 66–76.Google Scholar
Xanthakis-Karamanos, G. (1980) Studies in Fourth-Century Tragedy. Athens: Akadēmia Athēnōn.Google Scholar
Yunis, H. (1996) Taming Democracy: Models of Political Rhetoric in Classical Athens. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Yunis, H. (2011) Plato: Phaedrus. Cambridge Greek and Latin Classics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yunis, H. (ed.) (2003) Written Texts and the Rise of Literate Culture in Ancient Greece. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zajonz, S. (2002) Isocrates’ Enkomion auf Helena: Ein Kommentar. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Zanker, P. (1995) The Mask of Socrates: The Image of the Intellectual in Antiquity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Laura Viidebaum, New York University
  • Book: Creating the Ancient Rhetorical Tradition
  • Online publication: 03 November 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108873956.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Laura Viidebaum, New York University
  • Book: Creating the Ancient Rhetorical Tradition
  • Online publication: 03 November 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108873956.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Laura Viidebaum, New York University
  • Book: Creating the Ancient Rhetorical Tradition
  • Online publication: 03 November 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108873956.012
Available formats
×