Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:37:37.380Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2023

Sandra Botero
Sandra Botero
Affiliation:
Universidad del Rosario, Colombia
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Courts that Matter
Activists, Judges, and the Politics of Rights Enforcement
 , pp. 193 - 206
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramovich, Victor E. 2005. “Courses of Action in Economics, Social and Cultural Rights: Instruments and Allies.” Sur – International Journal on Human Rights 2: 194–232. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-64452005000100009.Google Scholar
ACHC. 2012. “La Cartera Hospitalaria Sigue Creciendo, Ya Supera Los 4 Billones de Pesos.” Bogotá: Asociación Colombiana de Clínicas y Hospitales.Google Scholar
ACIJ, and Junta Vecinal de Villa Inflamable. 2012. “Villa Inflamable: Donde Comenzó El Caso ‘Mendoza’ Los Derechos Siguen Esperando.” Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
ACUMAR. 2022, April 8. Basurales remanentes de la Línea de Base, por tipología. ACUMAR. www.acumar.gob.ar/indicadores/basurales-remanente-linea-base/Google Scholar
ADC. 2008. La Corte y los derechos: 2005–2007. Buenos Aires: Siglo Veintiuno.Google Scholar
Albarracín, Mauricio. 2022. “Moviendo La Constitución: Reconocimiento Del Matrimonio Igualitario En Colombia.” In Activismo Judicial: Como Deciden Los Tribunales Constitucionales de América Latina. Un Análisis a Partir Del Matrimonio Igualitario, edited by Fuchs, Marie-Christine and Hennig Leal, Mônia Clarissa, 181–232. Bogotá: KAS/Temis.Google Scholar
Albisa, Cathy, and Shanor, Amanda. 2017. “United States: Education Rights and the Parameters of the Possible.” In Social Rights Judgments and the Politics of Compliance: Making It Stick, edited by Langford, Malcolm, Rodríguez Garavito, César, and Rossi, Julieta, 255–86. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Alizada, Nazifa, Cole, Rowan, Gastaldi, Lisa, et al. 2021. “Autocratization Turns Viral: Democracy Report 2021.” V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Andreassen, Bård-Anders, and Crawford, Gordon. 2013. Human Rights, Power and Civic Action: Comparative Analyses of Struggles for Rights in Developing Societies. Routledge Research in Human Rights 5. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, Karina. 2013. “More Power, More Rights? The Supreme Court and Society in Mexico.” In Cultures of Legality: Judicialization and Political Activism in Latin America, edited by Couso, Javier, Huneeus, Alexandra, and Sieder, Rachel, 78–111. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, Karina, Botero, Sandra, and Gonzalez-Ocantos, Ezequiel González. 2022. “Conceptualizar y medir la cultura legal. Evidencia a partir de una encuesta a Jueces Federales Mexicanos.” Política y gobierno 29 (2). www.politicaygobierno.cide.edu/index.php/pyg/article/view/1497.Google Scholar
Attrill, Martin. 1998. A Rehabilitated Estuarine Ecosystem: The Environment and Ecology of the Thames Estuary. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Auditoría General de la Nación, Argentina. 2016. “Informe de Auditoría.”Google Scholar
Banik, Dan. 2010. “Governing a Giant: The Limits of Judicial Activism on Hunger in India.” Journal of Asian Public Policy 3 (3): 263–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2010.536343.Google Scholar
Barrera, Leticia, and Sáenz, Jimena. 2020. “Corte Suprema y participación ciudadana: reflexiones a partir de una audiencia pública de la Corte argentina.” Estudios Socio-Jurídicos 22 (1): 263–91. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/sociojuridicos/a.8069.Google Scholar
Barreto Valderrama, Francisco. 2012. “La Crisis Del Sistema UPAC Como Crisis Social y Su Dimensión Jurídica: Política, Regulación y Neoconstitucionalismo.” In Los Actores En La Crisis Económica de Fin de Siglo, edited by Urrutia, Miguel and Llano, Jorge, 101–62. Bogotá: Universidad de Los Andes.Google Scholar
Baviskar, Amita. 2012. “Public Interest and Private Compromises: The Politics of Environmental Negotiation in India.” In Law against the State: Ethnographic Forays into Law’s Transformations, edited by Eckert, Julia M., 171–201. Cambridge Studies in Law and Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benedetti, Miguel Ángel, and Sáenz, Jimena. 2016. Las Audiencias Públicas de la Corte Suprema: Apertura y límites de la Participación Ciudadana en la Justicia. Derecho y Política Ser. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI Editores.Google Scholar
Bergallo, Paola. 2006. “Justicia Y Experimentalismo: La Función Remedial Del Poder Judicial En El Litigio de Derecho Publico En Argentina.” In Derecho Y Pobreza, edited by Saba, Roberto. Buenos Aires: SELA.Google Scholar
Bergallo, Paola. 2014. “La Causa Mendoza: Una Experiencia de Judicialización Cooperativa Sobre El Derecho a La Salud.” In Por Una Justicia Dialógica: El Poder Judicial Como Promotor de La Deliberación Democrática, edited by Gargarella, Roberto, 245–91. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI Editores.Google Scholar
Bertranou, Fabio, Cetrángolo, Oscar, Grushka, Carlos, and Casanova, Luis. 2011. Encrucijadas En La Seguridad Social Argentina: Reformas, Cobertura y Desafíos Para El Sistema de Pensiones. Buenos Aires: CEPAL/Organización Internacional del Trabajo.Google Scholar
Bhuwania, Anuj. 2017. Courting the People: Public Interest Litigation in Post-Emergency India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bhuwania, Anuj. 2018. “The Case That Felled a City: Examining the Politics of Indian Public Interest Litigation through One Case.” South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal 17 (March): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.4000/samaj.4469.Google Scholar
Birchfield, Lauren, and Corsi, Jessica. 2009. “Between Starvation and Globalization: Realizing the Right to Food in India.” Michigan Journal of International Law 31: 691.Google Scholar
Bonilla Maldonado, Daniel. 2013. Constitutionalism of the Global South: The Activist Tribunals of India, South Africa, and Colombia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Botero, Sandra. 2018. “Agents of Neoliberalism? High Courts, Legal Preferences and Rights in Latin America.” In Latin America since the Left Turn, edited by Falleti, Tulia and Parrado, Emilio, 214–40. Democracy, Citizenship, and Constitutionalism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Botero, Sandra. 2020. “Confianza, Apoyo a La Democracia y Corrupción: Una Mirada a La Corte Constitucional Colombiana En La Opinión Pública.” Latin American Law Review 4 (January): 25–47. https://doi.org/10.29263/lar04.2020.02.Google Scholar
Botero, Sandra, and Brinks, Daniel M.. 2023. “The Politics of Judicial Impact in Social and Economic Rights Cases.” In The Oxford Handbook of Economic and Social Rights, edited by Langford, Malcolm and Young, Katharine. Oxford: Oxford University Press (online edn, Oxford Academic, 18 Aug. 2022). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197550021.013.15, accessed 9 June 2023.Google Scholar
Botero, Sandra, Brinks, Daniel M., and Gonzalez-Ocantos, Ezequiel A., eds. 2022. The Limits of Judicialization: Progress and Backlash in Latin American Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brinks, Daniel M., and Blass, Abby. 2018. The DNA of Constitutional Justice in Latin America: Politics, Governance, and Judicial Design. Cambridge. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316823538.Google Scholar
Brinks, Daniel M., and Forbath, William. 2014. “The Role of Courts and Constitutions in the New Politics of Welfare in Latin America.” In Law and Development of Middle-Income Countries: Avoiding the Middle-Income Trap, edited by Peerenboom, Randall P. and Ginsburg, Tom, pp. 221–245. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brinks, Daniel M., Gloppen, Siri, and Wilson, Bruce. 2012. “Transforming Environmental Conflicts through Law: A Framework for the Study of Water, Rights, and the Politics of Human Development.” In Paper Presented at the Annual Conference of the Law and Society Association, Honolulu, HI, June 5–8, 2012.Google Scholar
Brinks, Daniel M., Murillo, M. V., and Levitsky, S., eds. 2020. The Politics of Institutional Weakness in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bryerley, Alissa. 2019. “PUCL v. Union of India Political Mobilization and the Right to Food.” In A Qualified Hope: The Indian Supreme Court and Progressive Social Change, edited by Rosenberg, Gerald N, Krishnaswamy, Sudhir, and Bail, Shishir, 212–42. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bustamante, Thomas, and Neder Meyer, Emilio Peluso. 2022. “The Brazilian Federal Supreme Court’s Reaction to Bolsonaro.” Verfassungsblog (blog). September 26, 2022. https://verfassungsblog.de/the-brazilian-federal-supreme-courts-reaction-to-bolsonaro/.Google Scholar
Calderón Lopez, José Miguel. 2002. “El Rol Político de Los Jueces En El Trazado de La Regulación Económica: El Caso Del Sistema UPAC.” MA Thesis, Bogota: Universidad Javeriana.Google Scholar
Cano Blandón, Luisa Fernanda. 2017. “Constitucionalismo Experimental y Protección Judicial Del Derecho al Agua En Colombia.” PhD Dissertation, Bogotá, Colombia: Universidad de Los Andes.Google Scholar
Cano Blandón, Luisa Fernanda. 2021. “Los límites de la justicia dialógica en la protección de los derechos sociales en Colombia.” Revista Derecho del Estado, 49 (April): 131–58. https://doi.org/10.18601/01229893.n49.08.Google Scholar
Castillo-Ortiz, Pablo. 2019. “The Illiberal Abuse of Constitutional Courts in Europe.” European Constitutional Law Review 15 (1): 48–72. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019619000026.Google Scholar
Cavanagh, Ralph, and Sarat, Austin. 1980. “Thinking about Courts: Toward and Beyond a Jurisprudence of Judicial Competence.” Law & Society Review 14 (2): 371–420. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053318.Google Scholar
CELS. 2004. Derechos humanos en Argentina: Informe 2004. Buenos Aires: CELS and Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
CELS. 2007. Derechos humanos en la Argentina: Informe 2007. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI Editores.Google Scholar
CELS. 2009. “En Busca de Soluciones Judiciales Para Mejorar La Calidad de Vida de Los Habitantes de La Cuenca Matanza-Riachuelo.” In Derechos Humanos En Argentina: Informe 2009. CELS/Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
CELS. 2012. “El Modelo de La Prisión Depósito. Medidas Urgentes En Los Lugares de Detención En La Argentina.” In Derechos Humanos En La Argentina: Informe 2012, 183–255. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI Editores.Google Scholar
Cepeda, Manuel José. 2011. “Social and Economic Rights and the Colombian Constitutional Court.” In Texas Law Review Symposium, Latin American Constitutionalism, Social and Economic Rights Panel, University of Texas at Austin, March 4.Google Scholar
Chandra, Shekhar. 2018. “Why Delhi’s Air Pollution Problem Never Gets Solved.” June 20, 2018. www.livemint.com/Opinion/Cq1XFnxfqjkKyA8mRIsg2M/Why-Delhis-air-pollution-problem-never-gets-solved.html.Google Scholar
CIPPES. 2013. Pobreza E Indigencia En Argentina. Buenos Aires: Centro de Investigaciones Participativas en Políticias Económicas y Sociales.Google Scholar
Clavijo, Sergio. 2007. “Impacto Económico de Algunas Sentencias de La Corte: El Caso de La ‘Mesada Pensional 14’ y de Las Regulaciones En Vivienda.” In Dialogo Entre Abogados y Economistas Sobre Aspectos Económicos de La Constitución. Bogotá: Ministerio de Hacienda.Google Scholar
Colombia, Corte Constitucional. 2017. T-302 2017. M.P. Aquiles Arrieta.Google Scholar
Comité contra la Tortura. 2007. El Sistema de La Crueldad. Informe Sobre Violaciones a Los Derechos Humanos En Los Lugares de Detención de La Provincia de Buenos Aires. 2006–2007. La Plata: Comité Contra la Tortura, Comisión por la Memoria de la Provincia de Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Comité contra la Tortura. 2012. Informe Anual 2012. La Plata: Comité contra la Tortura.Google Scholar
Comité por la Memoria. 2018. “Informe Anual 2018. El Sistema de La Crueldad XII.” Comité por la Memoria.Google Scholar
Corte Constitucional de Colombia, Sala de Seguimiento de la T-760 2008. n.d. “Seguimiento Al Cumplimiento de La Sentencia T-760 de 2008.”Google Scholar
CSR. 2010. “Pacto Social Por El Derecho a La Salud.”Google Scholar
Cuerpo Colegiado. 2016. “Cuerpo Colegiado: Sobre El Proceso de Saneamiento Del Riachuelo.”Google Scholar
Cuellar, Maria Mercedes. 2006. ¿A la Vivienda quien la ronda? Tomo I. Bogota: Universidad Externado.Google Scholar
Defensoría del Pueblo, Colombia. 2010. “La Tutela y El Derecho a La Salud 2009.” Bogota: Defensoría del Pueblo.Google Scholar
Defensoría del Pueblo, Colombia. 2011. “La Tutela y El Derecho a La Salud 2010.” Bogota: Defensoría del Pueblo.Google Scholar
Defensoría del Pueblo, Colombia. 2012. “La Tutela y El Derecho a La Salud 2011.” Bogota: Defensoría del Pueblo.Google Scholar
Defensor del Pueblo de la Nación. 2014. Residuos y basurales: Escrito presentado en el Expediente Causa Matanza Riachuelo No 311/05. http://dpn.gob.ar/articulo.php?id=3109&pagN=6.Google Scholar
Defensor del Pueblo de la Nación, Asociación Vecinos de la Boca, CELS, Defensoría Adjunta de la CABA, FARN, Fundación Ciudadano, and Universidad Tecnologica Nacional. 2003. “Informe Especial Sobre La Cuenca Matanza – Riachuelo.” Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Dixon, Rosalind. 2007. “Creating Dialogue about Socioeconomic Rights: Strong-Form versus Weak-Form Judicial Review Revisited.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 5 (3): 391–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Rosalind, and Chowdhury, Rishad. 2019. “A Case for Qualified Hope? The Supreme Court of India and the Midday Meal Decision.” In A Qualified Hope: The Indian Supreme Court and Progressive Social Change, edited by Rosenberg, Gerald N, Krishnaswamy, Sudhir, and Bail, Shishir, 243–68. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Magali. 2013. “The Judiciary’s Role in Environmental Governance.” Environmental Policy and Law 9: 167.Google Scholar
Drèze, Jean. 2006. “Universalisation with Quality: ICDS in a Rights Perspective.” Economic and Political Weekly August: 3706–15.Google Scholar
Drèze, Jean, and Goyal, Aparajita. 2003. “Future of Mid-Day Meals.” Economic and Political Weekly 38 (44): 4673–83. https://doi.org/10.2307/4414222.Google Scholar
Drèze, Jean, and Khera, Reetika. 2013. “Rural Poverty and the Public Distribution System.” Economic and Political Weekly XLVIII (45–46): 55–60.Google Scholar
Dugard, Jackie. 2022. “Water Rights Struggles in Johannesburg and Detroit Revisited: Looking Beyond Courts at the Politics and Power of Rights-Based Legal Mobilization in a Neoliberal Global Order: A ‘Powerpack’ Analysis.” Journal of Human Rights Practice 15 (1): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huac011.Google Scholar
Epp, Charles R. 1998. The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, and Knight, Jack. 2013. “Reconsidering Judicial Preferences.” Annual Review of Political Science 16 (1): 11–31. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-032211-214229.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, Knight, Jack, and Shvetsova, Olga. 2001. “The Role of Constitutional Courts in the Establishment and Maintenance of Democratic Systems of Government.” Law & Society Review 35 (1): 117. https://doi.org/10.2307/3185388.Google Scholar
FARN. 2014. “Boletin FARN No. 28.” Fundación Ambiente y Recursos Naturales.Google Scholar
FARN, CELS, Greenpea, ACDH, and Vecinos de la Boca. 2017. “9 Años Del Fallo de La Corte. Una Política de Estado Todavía Ausente.”Google Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm. 1998. Judicial Policy Making and the Modern State: How the Courts Reformed America’s Prisons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ferraz, Octavio. 2011. “Brazil : Health Inequalities, Rights, and Courts : The Social Impact of the Judicialization of Health.” In Litigating Health Rights: Can Courts Bring More Justice to Health, edited by Yamin, Alicia Ely and Gloppen, Siri, 76–102. Human Rights Program Practice Series. Cambridge, MA: Human Rights Program, Harvard Law School: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fillipini, Leonardo. n.d. “Superpoblación Carcelaria y Hábeas Corpus Colectivo.” Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Forero Alba, Sofia, and Rodriguez Raga, Juan Carlos. 2022. “Courting Judicial Legitimacy: An Experimental Study of the Colombian Constitutional Court.” In The Limits of Judicialization: Progress and Backlash in Latin American Politics, edited by Botero, Sandra, Brinks, Daniel M., and Gonzalez-Ocantos, Ezequiel A., 164–94. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Forero, Efraín. 2014. “Evolution of the Mortgage System in Colombia: From the UPAC to the UVR.” Housing Finance International 18 (3): 32–41.Google Scholar
Fundación Metropolitana. 2018, July. La cuenca del Matanza Riachuelo a 10 años del fallo Mendoza. Fundación Metropolitana. https://metropolitana.org.ar/idm/la-cuenca-del-matanza-riachuelo-a-10-anos-del-fallo-mendoza/.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc. 1974. “Why the Haves Come out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change.” Law & Society Review 9: 95.Google Scholar
Gargarella, Roberto. 2014a. “Deliberative Democracy, Dialogic Justice and the Promise of Social and Economic Rights.” In Social and Economic Rights in Theory and Practice, edited by Garcia, Helena Alviar, Klare, Karl, and Williams, Lucy A., 105–20. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gargarella, Roberto. 2014b. “El nuevo constitucionalismo dialógico frente al sistema de los frenos y contrapesos.” In Por una justicia dialógica: el poder judicial como promotor de la deliberación democrática, edited by Gargarella, Roberto, 119–58. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI Editores Argentina.Google Scholar
Gauri, Varun, and Brinks, Daniel M., eds. 2008. Courting Social Justice: Judicial Enforcement of Social and Economic Rights in the Developing World. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gauri, Varun, Staton, Jeffrey K., and Cullell, Jorge Vargas. 2015. “The Costa Rican Supreme Court’s Compliance Monitoring System.” The Journal of Politics 77 (3): 774–86. https://doi.org/10.1086/681260.Google Scholar
George, Alexander L., and Bennett, Andrew. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gerring, J., and Cojocaru, L.. 2016. “Selecting Cases for Intensive Analysis: A Diversity of Goals and Methods.” Sociological Methods & Research 45 (3): 392–423.Google Scholar
Gianella-Malca, Camila, Gloppen, Siri, and Fosse, Elisabeth. 2013. “Giving Effect to Children’s Right to Health in Colombia? Analysing the Implementation of Court Decisions Ordering Health System Reform.” Journal of Human Rights Practice 5 (1): 153–76. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/hus035.Google Scholar
Gianella-Malca, Camila, Vera, Oscar Parra, Yamin, Alicia Ely, and Tovar, Mauricio Torres. 2009. “¿Deliberación Democrática O Mercadeo Social? Los Dilemas de La Definición Pública En Salud En El Contexto Del Seguimiento de La Sentencia T–760 de 2008.” Health and Human Rights.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L., Caldeira, Gregory A., and Baird, Vanessa A.. 1998. “On the Legitimacy of National High Courts.” American Political Science Review 92 (2): 343–58. https://doi.org/10.2307/2585668.Google Scholar
Gillman, Howard. 1999. “The Court as an Idea, Not a Building (or a Game): Interpretive Institutionalism and the Analysis of Supreme Court Decision-Making.” In Supreme Court Decision-Making: New Institutionalist Approaches, edited by Clayton, Cornell W. and Gillman, Howard, 65–87. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Gloppen, Siri. 2008. “Litigation as a Strategy to Hold Governments Accountable for Implementing the Right to Health.” Health and Human Rights 10 (2): 21–36.Google Scholar
Gloppen, Siri. 2011. “Litigating Health Rights: Framing the Analysis.” In Litigating Health Rights: Can Courts Bring More Justice to Health, edited by Yamin, Alicia Ely and Gloppen, Siri. Human Rights Program Practice Series, 17–42. Cambridge, MA: Human Rights Program, Harvard Law School: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gloppen, Siri, Gargarella, Roberto, and Skaar, Elin, eds. 2004. Democratization and the Judiciary the Accountability Function of Courts in New Democracies. London/Portland: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Goertz, Gary. 2006. Social Science Concepts: A User’s Guide. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gonzalez Velez, Ana Cristina, and Jaramillo Sierra, Isabel Cristina. 2020. La Batalla Por El Derecho al Aborto. Bogota: Siglo del Hombre Editores | Universidad de Los Andes | La Mesa por la Vida y la Salud de las Mujeres.Google Scholar
Gonzalez-Ocantos, Ezequiel A. 2016. Shifting Legal Visions: Judicial Change and Human Rights Trials in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Greenpeace Argentina. 2013. “Las Aguas Siguen Bajando Turbias: Análisis Sobre La Calidad Ambiental de Las Aguas Superficiales En La Cuenca Matanza-Riachuelo. Campañas ACUMAR 2008–2012.” Buenos Aires: Greenpeace.Google Scholar
Guha-Khasnobis, Basudeb, and Vivēkānanda, S. 2007. Rights-Based Approach to Development Lessons from the Right to Food Movement in India. Helsinki, Finland: UNU World Inst. for Development Economics Research (UNU/WIDER).Google Scholar
Beltrán, Gutiérrez, Mauricio, Andrés. 2018. El Amparo Estructural de Los Derechos. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez, Ricardo, and Merlinsky, María Gabriela. 2011. “En Los Confines de La Política Ambiental: Gestión Municipal y Articulación Interjurisdiccional En La Región Metropolitana de Buenos Aires.” In X Congreso Nacional de Ciencia Política Argentina, Córdoba, Argentina.Google Scholar
Guttikunda, Sarath K., and Goel, Rahul. 2013. “Health Impacts of Particulate Pollution in a Megacity—Delhi, India.” Environmental Development 6 (April): 8–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2012.12.002.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter. 2003. “Aligning Ontology and Methodology in Comparative Research.” In Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, edited by Mahoney, James and Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, 373–404. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hernández Álvarez, Mario, and Tovar, Mauricio Torres. 2010. “Colombia’s New Health Reform: Helping Keep the Financial Sector Healthy.” Social Medicine 5 (4): 177–81.Google Scholar
Herrero, Álvaro. 2011. “La incidencia de la Corte Suprema de Justicia en la formulación de políticas públicas: una exploración empírica del caso argentino.” Política. Revista de Ciencia Política 49 (1): 71/106. https://doi.org/10.5354/rp.v49i1.16311.Google Scholar
Hertel, Shareen. 2015. “Hungry for Justice: Social Mobilization on the Right to Food in India: Social Mobilization on the Right to Food in India.” Development and Change 46 (1): 72–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12144.Google Scholar
Hibbing, John R., and Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth. 2002. Stealth Democracy: Americans’ Beliefs About How Government Should Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hilbink, Lisa. 2011. Judges beyond Politics in Democracy and Dictatorship: Lessons from Chile. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschl, Ran. 2004. Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschl, Ran, and Rosevear, Evan. 2011. “Constitutional Law Meets Comparative Politics: Socio-Economic Rights and Political Realities.” In The Legal Protection of Human Rights: Sceptical Essays, edited by Campbell, Tom, Ewing, K.D., and Tomkins, Adam, 207–228. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Donald L. 1977. The Courts and Social Policy. Washington: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Howse, Robert, and Teitel, Ruti. 2010. “Beyond Compliance: Rethinking Why International Law Really Matters: Beyond Compliance.” Global Policy 1 (2): 127–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-5899.2010.00035.x.Google Scholar
Huq, Aziz Z. 2018. “Democratic Erosion and the Courts: Comparative Perspectives.” New York University Law Review 93 (21): 21–31.Google Scholar
Jackson, Michael, and Rosencranz, Armin. 2003. “The Delhi Pollution Case: Can the Supreme Court Manage the Environment?” Environmental Policy and Law 33 (2): 88–91.Google Scholar
Jayaraman, Rajshri, and Simroth, Dora. 2011. “The Impact of School Lunches on Primary School Enrollment: Evidence from India’s Midday Meal Scheme.” https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1969396.Google Scholar
Jimenez Gil, William. 2010. Pierre Bourdieu y La Racionalidad Jurídica Como Instrumento de Subyugación: Análisis de La Crisis de Los Deudores Individuales de Créditos Hipotecarios En UPAC a La Luz de La Teoriética Del Campo Jurídico. Bogota: Universidad La Gran Colombia.Google Scholar
Kapiszewski, Diana. 2012. High Courts and Economic Governance in Argentina and Brazil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kapiszewski, Diana, and Taylor, Matthew M.. 2013. “Compliance: Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Explaining Adherence to Judicial Rulings.” Law & Social Inquiry 38 (4): 803–35.Google Scholar
Kathuria, Vinish. 2004. “Impact of CNG on Vehicular Pollution in Delhi: A Note.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 9 (5): 409–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2004.05.003.Google Scholar
Keck, Thomas M. 2009. “Beyond Backlash: Assessing the Impact of Judicial Decisions on LGBT Rights.” Law & Society Review 43 (1): 151–86.Google Scholar
Keck, Thomas M. 2014. Judicial Politics in Polarized Times. EBSCOhost EBook Collection. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Khera, R. 2011. “Revival of the Public Distribution System: Evidence and Explanations.” Economic and Political Weekly XLVI (44–45), 36–50.Google Scholar
Klarman, Michael J. 2004. From Jim Crow to Civil Rights: The Supreme Court and the Struggle for Racial Equality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Krishnan, Preethi, and Subramaniam, Mangala. 2014. “Understanding the State: Right to Food Campaign in India.” The Global South 8 (2): 101–18.Google Scholar
Kureshi, Yasser. 2022. “To Reinforce or Replace: Judicial Roles and Democratic Backsliding.” Manuscript.Google Scholar
Landau, David. 2012. “Landau (2012) The Reality of Social Rights Enforcement.” Harvard International Law Journal 53: 190–247.Google Scholar
Langford, Malcolm. 2014a. “Housing Rights Litigation: Grootboom and Beyond.” In Socio-Economic Rights in South Africa: Symbols or Substance?, edited by Langford, Malcolm, Cousins, Ben, Dugard, Jackie, and Madlingozi, Tshepo, 187–225. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Langford, Malcolm. 2014b. “Introduction.” In Socio-Economic Rights in South Africa: Symbols or Substance?, edited by Langford, Malcolm, Cousins, Ben, Dugard, Jackie, and Madlingozi, Tshepo, 1–32. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Langford, Malcolm. 2021. “The Impact of Public Interest Litigation: The Case of Socio-Economic Rights.” Australian Journal of Human Rights 27 (3): 505–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/1323238X.2022.2030039.Google Scholar
Langford, Malcolm, Cousins, Ben, Dugard, Jackie, and Madlingozi, Tshepo, eds. 2014. Socio-Economic Rights in South Africa: Symbols or Substance? New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Langford, Malcolm, and Kahanovitz, Steven. 2017. “South Africa: Rethinking Enforcement Narratives.” In Social Rights Judgments and the Politics of Compliance: Making It Stick, edited by Langford, Malcolm, Garavito, César Rodríguez, and Rossi, Julieta, 315–350. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316673058.Google Scholar
Langford, Malcolm, Garavito, César Rodríguez, and Rossi, Julieta, eds. 2017. Social Rights Judgments and the Politics of Compliance: Making It Stick. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316673058.Google Scholar
Larkins, Cristopher. 1998. “The Judiciary and Delegative Democracy in Argentina.” Comparative Politics 30 (4): 423–43.Google Scholar
Leal, Fernando, and Pereira, Thomaz. 2022. “The Court, the Text, and the Struggle for Constitutional Fidelity in Brazil.” Verfassungsblog (blog). September 26, 2022. https://verfassungsblog.de/the-court-the-text-and-the-struggle-for-constitutional-fidelity-in-brazil/.Google Scholar
Liebenberg, Sandra. 2014. “Participatory Approaches to Socio-Economic Rights Adjudication: Tentative Lessons from South African Evictions Law.” Nordic Journal of Human Rights 32 (4): 312–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/18918131.2015.957462.Google Scholar
Linzer, Drew A., and Staton, Jeffrey K.. 2015. “A Global Measure of Judicial Independence, 1948–2012.” Journal of Law and Courts 3 (2): 223–56. https://doi.org/10.1086/682150.Google Scholar
López Sánchez, Ericka. 2021. “Las cortes supremas y los derechos LGBT en América Latina.” Revista de Estudios Políticos 194 (December): 157–88. https://doi.org/10.18042/cepc/rep.194.06.Google Scholar
Madlingozi, Tshepo. 2014. “Post-Apartheid Social Movements and Legal Mobilisation.” In Socio-Economic Rights in South Africa: Symbols or Substance?, edited by Langford, Malcolm, Cousins, Ben, Dugard, Jackie, and Madlingozi, Tshepo, 92–130. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James. 2003. “Strategies of Causal Assessment in Comparative Historical Analysis.” In Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, edited by Mahoney, James and Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, 337–72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James. 2012. “The Logic of Process Tracing Tests in the Social Sciences.” Sociological Methods & Research 41 (4): 550–97.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James, and Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, eds. 2003. Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mander, Harsh. 2012. “Food from the Courts: The Indian Experience.” IDS Bulletin 43 (s1): 15–24.Google Scholar
Mathur, Kuldeep. 2004. “Battling for Clean Environment: Supreme Court, Technocrats and Populist Politics in Delhi.” Working Paper, #1, Working Paper Series, Centre for the Study of Law and Governance Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug, and Scott, Richard. 2005. “Organizations and Movements.” In Social Movements and Organization Theory, edited by Davis, Gerald F., McAdam, Doug, Richard, William, Mayer, Scott, and Zald, Nathan, 4–40. Cambridge Studies in Contentious Politics. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael. 1994. Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Language and Legal Discourse. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael. 1996. “Causal versus Constitutive Explanations (or, On the Difficulty of Being so Positive…).” Law & Social Inquiry 21 (2): 457–82.Google Scholar
McCubbins, Mathew D., and Schwartz, Thomas. 1984. “Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols versus Fire Alarms.” American Journal of Political Science 28 (1): 165. https://doi.org/10.2307/2110792.Google Scholar
Menon, Nivedita. 2014. “Environment and the Will to Rule: Supreme Court and Public Interest Litigation in the 1990s.” In The Shifting Scales of Justice: The Supreme Court in Neo-Liberal India, edited by Suresh, Mayur and Narrain, Siddharth, 59–78. New Delhi: Orient BlackSwan.Google Scholar
Merlinsky, María Gabriela. 2009. “Atravesando El Rio: La Construcción Social y Política de La Cuestión Ambiental En Argentina.” PhD Dissertation, Paris/Buenos Aires: Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de Buenos Aires / Paris 8.Google Scholar
Merlinsky, María Gabriela. 2016. “Efectos de las causas estructurales en el largo plazo: la causa Riachuelo.” Revista Direito e Práxis 7 (14): 397–420. https://doi.org/10.12957/dep.2016.22954.Google Scholar
de Justicia, Ministerio, de Buenos Aires, Provincia. 2010. “Informe Casal (Respuesta a La Resolución de La Corte Suprema de Justicia de La Provincia de Buenos Aires).” La Plata.Google Scholar
Moog, Robert. 2019. “Implementation in the Delhi Pollution Case.” In A Qualified Hope: The Indian Supreme Court and Progressive Social Change, edited by Rosenberg, Gerald N, Krishnaswamy, Sudhir, and Bail, Shishir, 269–92. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Muñoz, Andrea Juliana, García, Bonnie Dayana, and Lara, Rosa Angélica. 2007. “Derecho Del Medio Ambiente y Mecanismos de Participación Ciudadana En El Canal Bogotá (San José de Cúcuta).” Cucuta: Universidad Libre.Google Scholar
Nader, Esteban. 2022. Constitución, Justicia Ambiental y Derechos. Instituto de Estudios Constitucionales del Estado de Queretaro.Google Scholar
Napoli, Andres. 2009. “Una Política de Estado Para El Riachuelo. Informe Ambiental FARN.” Buenos Aires: FARN.Google Scholar
Napoli, Andres, and Espil, Javier García. 2011. “Riachuelo: Hacer Hoy Pensando En La Cuenca Del Mañana. Informe Ambiental FARN.” Buenos Aires: FARN.Google Scholar
Narain, Urvashi, and Bell, Ruth Greenspan. 2005. “Who Changed Delhi’s Air? The Roles of the Court and the Executive in Environmental Policymaking.” 05–48. Washington DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
Nigam, A. 2014. “Embedded Judiciary: Or the Judicial State of Exception?” In The Shifting Scales of Justice: The Supreme Court in Neo-Liberal India, edited by Suresh, M. and Narrain, S., 28–38. New Delhi: Orient BlackSwan.Google Scholar
Nunes, Rodrigo M. 2010. “Ideational Origins of Progressive Judicial Activism: The Colombian Constitutional Court and the Right to Health.” Latin American Politics and Society 52 (3): 67–97.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, Guillermo. 1999. “Polyarchies and the (Un)Rule of Law in Latin America: A Partial Conclusion.” In The (Un) Rule of Law and the Underprivileged in Latin America, edited by Méndez, Juan E, Sérgio, Paulo Sarmento Pinheiro, de Moraes, and O’Donnell, Guillermo A, 303–37. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Orduz Salinas, Natalia. 2014. “La Consulta Previa En Colombia.” 3. Documentos de Trabajo ICSO. Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias Sociales UDP.Google Scholar
Pande, Suchi, and Houtzager, Peter P.. 2016. “Food Fight: Civil Society Innovation and Resilience in the Struggle for the Right to Food in India.” IDS Working Paper, Brighton: IDS. www.researchgate.net/profile/Peter_Houtzager/publication/303406624_Food_Fight_Civil_Society_Innovation_and_Resilience_in_the_Struggle_for_the_Right_to_Food_in_India/links/5741e46408ae9f741b37541a.pdf.Google Scholar
Parra Vera, Oscar, and Yamin, Alicia Ely. 2013. “La Sentencia T-760 de 2008, Su Implementación e Impacto: Retos y Oportunidades Para La Justicia Dialógica.” In Salud: Sobre (Des)Igualdades y Derechos, edited by Clérico, Laura, 2191–649. Buenos Aires: Abelardo Perrot.Google Scholar
Peruzzotti, Enrique, and Smulovitz, Catalina. 2006. Enforcing the Rule of Law: Social Accountability in the New Latin American Democracies. Pitt Latin American Series. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2004. Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Puga, Mariela. 2012. Litigio y Cambio Social En Argentina y Colombia. Buenos Aires: CLACSO.Google Scholar
Rajamani, Lavanya. 2007. “Public Interest Environmental Litigation in India: Exploring Issues of Access, Participation, Equity, Effectiveness and Sustainability.” Journal of Environmental Law 19 (3): 293–321. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqm020.Google Scholar
Ravindra, Khaiwal, Wauters, Eric, Tyagi, Sushil K., Mor, Suman, and Van Grieken, René. 2006. “Assessment of Air Quality After the Implementation of Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) as Fuel in Public Transport in Delhi, India.” Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 115 (1): 405–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-7051-5.Google Scholar
Rich, Jessica. 2019. State-Sponsored Activism: Bureaucrats and Social Movements in Democratic Brazil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roa, Jorge Ernesto, . 2019. “Justicia constitucional, deliberación y democracia en Colombia: Jeremy Waldron reflexivo en Bogotá.” Revista Derecho del Estado 44: 57–98.Google Scholar
Robertson, Graeme B. 2011. The Politics of Protest in Hybrid Regimes. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rodríguez Garavito, César. 2010. “Beyond the Courtroom: The Impact of Judicial Activism on Socioeconomic Rights in Latin America.” Texas Law Review 89: 1669.Google Scholar
Rodríguez Garavito, César. 2012. “La Judicialización de La Salud: Síntomas, Diagnósticos y Prescripciones.” In La Salud En Colombia: Logros, Retos y Recomendaciones. edtied by Bernal, Oscar and Gutiérrez, Catalina, 507–60, Bogota: Universidad de Los Andes.Google Scholar
Rodríguez Garavito, César. ed. 2022. Litigating the Climate Emergency: How Human Rights, Courts, and Legal Mobilization Can Bolster Climate Action. Globalization and Human Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781009106214.Google Scholar
Rodríguez Garavito, César, and Rodríguez Franco, Diana. 2010. Cortes y cambio social cómo la Corte Constitucional transformó el desplazamiento forzado en Colombia. Bogotá: Dejusticia.Google Scholar
Rodríguez Garavito, César, and Rodríguez Franco, Diana. 2015. Radical Deprivation on Trial: The Impact of Judicial Activism on Socioeconomic Rights in the Global South. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, Gloria Amparo. 2008. “Contexto: La Participación y Consulta Previa.” Semillas 36/37.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, Gloria Amparo, Gómez, Andrés, and Lozano, Carlos. 2011. Protección Jurídica Del Agua En Colombia. Bogotá: Grupo Editorial Ibañez.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, Peñaranda, Luisa, Maria. 2021. “¿Logran las decisiones judiciales emancipar? Metodologías en el seguimiento del cumplimiento de las decisiones judiciales.” In Altas cortes y transformación social. (Des) obediencia a las órdenes judiciales, edited by Rodriguez Peñaranda, Maria Luisa, Jimenez Estevez, Daniel Ricardo, and León Peñuela, Fabián Andrés, 11–66. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, Peñaranda, Luisa, Maria, Ricardo, Daniel, Estevez, Jimenez, and Andrés, Fabián, Peñuela, León. 2021. Altas cortes y transformación social. (Des) obediencia a las órdenes judiciales. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.Google Scholar
Rofman, Rafael. 2002. “The Pension System and the Crisis in Argentina: Learning the Lessons.”Google Scholar
Rofman, Rafael, Fajnzylber, Eduardo, and Herrera, Germán. 2008. “Reforming the Pension Reforms: The Recent Initiatives and Actions on Pensions in Argentina and Chile.” http://ssrn.com/abstract=1992438.Google Scholar
Romero-Prada, Martín, Marrugo-Figueroa, Rubén, Acero, Germán, Bautista, Carlos Arango, and Alvis-Guzman, Nelson. 2014. “Impacto En El Acceso a Medicamentos En La Población Colombiana Después de La Actualización Del Plan de Beneficios En El 2012.” Gerencia y Políticas de Salud 13 (27): 228–41. https://doi.org/10.11144/11969.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald N. 2008. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring about Social Change? Chicago; London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald N, Krishnaswamy, Sudhir, and Bail, Shishir, eds. 2019. A Qualified Hope: The Indian Supreme Court and Progressive Social Change. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rossi, Francisco, Umbacía, Luz Marina, and Sanchez, Edna. 2012. “Inclusiones de Medicamentos Incorporados En El Plan Obligatorio De Salud (POS) – Acuerdo 029 de 2011.” IFARMA.Google Scholar
Ruibal, Alba. 2009. “Self-Restraint in Search of Legitimacy: The Reform of the Argentine Supreme Court.” Latin American Politics and Society 51 (3): 59–86.Google Scholar
Ruibal, Alba. 2014. “Movement and Counter-Movement: A History of Abortion Law Reform and the Backlash in Colombia 2006–2014.” Reproductive Health Matters 22 (44): 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-8080(14)44803-1.Google Scholar
Rutledge, Jennifer Geist. 2012. “Courts as Entrepreneurs: The Case of the Indian Mid-Day Meals Programme.” Asian Politics & Policy 4 (4): 527–47.Google Scholar
Ryan, Daniel, Larivera, Cecilia, and Napoli, Andres. 2017. “Relocalizaciones Urbanas y Riesgos Ambientales: Un Análisis de Los Casos de Magaldi y Villa 26 En La Cuenca Matanza Riachuelo (Argentina).” WP19DR1SP. Working Papers. Lincolns Institute of Land and Policy.Google Scholar
Ryan, Daniel, and Napoli, Andres. 2017. “Legal Mobilization and the Politics of Water Pollution: The Case of the Matanza-Riachuelo Basin in Argentina.” In The Politics of Fresh Water Access, Conflict and Identity, edited by Ashcraft, Catherine and Mayer, Tamar, 28–40. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sabel, Charles F., and Simon, William H.. 2004. “Destabilization Rights: How Public Law Litigation Succeeds.” Harvard Law Review 117 (4): 1015–1101. https://doi.org/10.2307/4093364.Google Scholar
Sahu, Geetanjoy. 2008. “Implications of Indian Supreme Court’s Innovations for Environmental Jurisprudence.” Law, Environment and Development Journal 4 (1): 1–23.Google Scholar
Sanchez Botero, Esther. 2012. “La Consulta Previa En La Práctica.” Razón Pública 2012. https://razonpublica.com/la-consulta-previa-en-la-practica/.Google Scholar
Sánchez Urribarrí, Raul. 2022. “Populism, Constitutional Democracy, and High Courts – Lessons from the Venezuelan Case.” In Anti-Constitutional Populism, edited by Czarnota, Adam, Krygier, Martin, and Sadurski, Wojciech, 185–219. Cambridge Studies in Law and Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009031103.008.Google Scholar
Sandoval Rojas, Nathalia. 2021. “Institutional Conversion from Below: Free, Prior and Informed Consultation in Latin America.” PhD Dissertation, Austin: The University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Siegel, Reva B. 2006. “Constitutional Culture, Social Movement Conflict and Constitutional Change: The Case of the De Facto Era. 2005–2006 Brennan Center Symposium Lecture.” California Law Review 94 (5): 1323. https://doi.org/10.2307/20439068.Google Scholar
Sigal, Martín, Rossi, Julieta, and Morales, Diego. 2017. “Argentina: Implementation of Collective Cases.” In Social Rights Judgments and the Politics of Compliance: Making It Stick, edited by Langford, Malcolm, Garavito, César Rodríguez, and Rossi, Julieta, 140–75. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Slater, Dan, and Ziblatt, Daniel. 2013. “The Enduring Indispensability of the Controlled Comparison.” Comparative Political Studies 46 (10): 1301–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414012472469.Google Scholar
Srinivasan, V., and Narayanan, S. 2007. Food Policy and Social Movements: Reflections on the Right to Food Campaign in India [Case Study #1 of the program: “Food Policy for Developing Countries: The Role of Government in the Global Food System”].Google Scholar
Staton, Jeffrey K. 2010. Judicial Power and Strategic Communication in Mexico. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Staton, Jeffrey K., and Vanberg, Georg. 2008. “The Value of Vagueness: Delegation, Defiance, and Judicial Opinions.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (3): 504–19.Google Scholar
Stone, Diane. 2000. “Non-Governmental Policy Transfer: The Strategies of Independent Policy Institutes.” Governance 13 (1): 45–70.Google Scholar
Sturm, Susan. 1990. “Resolving the Remedial Dilemma: Strategies of Judicial Intervention in Prisons.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 138 (3): 805–912. https://doi.org/10.2307/3312269.Google Scholar
Thiruvengadam, Arun K. 2014. “Swallowing a Bitter PIL?: Reflections on Progressive Strategies for Public Interest Litigation in India.” In The Shifting Scales of Justice: The Supreme Court in Neo-Liberal India, edited by Suresh, Mayur and Narrain, Siddharth, 120–38. New Delhi: Orient BlackSwan.Google Scholar
Torres Tovar, Carlos Alberto. 2009. Ciudad Informal Colombiana. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.Google Scholar
Torres Tovar, Mauricio. 2011. “Diez Años Por Un Movimiento Social En Salud.” Le Monde Diplomatique, November 2011.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark V. 2008. Weak Courts, Strong Rights: Judicial Review and Social Welfare Rights in Comparative Constitutional Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Uprimny, Rodrigo. 2003. “The Constitutional Court and Control of Presidential Extraordinary Powers in Colombia.” Democratization 10 (4): 46–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510340312331294027.Google Scholar
Uprimny, Rodrigo, and García Villegas, Mauricio. 2004. “Corte Constitucional y Emancipación Social En Colombia.” In Emancipación Social y Violencia En Colombia, edited by Sousa Santos, Boaventura De and Villegas, Mauricio García, 463–514. Bogotá: Norma.Google Scholar
Vaca, Claudia. 2015. “El Plan de Beneficios de Colombia: ¿Que Lecciones Nos Deja?” Breve 8. Serie de Políticas y Métodos Basados En Presentaciones a Expertos. Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
Vanberg, Georg. 2001. “Legislative-Judicial Relations: A Game-Theoretic Approach to Constitutional Review.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (2): 346. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669345.Google Scholar
Vasquez Alfaro, Mónica. 2014. “La Crisis Del UPAC a Través de La Mirada de Los Jueces. Un Estudio de Caso En La Ciudad de Barranquilla (Colombia).” Revista de Derecho. www.redalyc.org/resumen.oa?id=85131029006.Google Scholar
Velandia Caicedo, Fernando. 2002. Del Rio Pamplonita al Rio Zulia. Historia Del Acueducto y Alcantarillado de La Ciudad de Cucuta. Cucuta: Litografia Nueva Granada.Google Scholar
Verbitsky, Horacio. 1993. Hacer La Corte: La Construcción de Un Poder Absoluto Sin Justicia Ni Control. Buenos Aires: Planeta.Google Scholar
Verón, René. 2006. “Remaking Urban Environments: The Political Ecology of Air Pollution in Delhi.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 38 (11): 2093–2109. https://doi.org/10.1068/a37449.Google Scholar
Villareal, Evelyn, and Wilson, Bruce. 2022. El Agua Como Derecho Humano: Reconocimientos y Disputas En Costa Rica. San José: Programa Estado de la Nación.Google Scholar
Vishwanath, Apurva. 2017. “What Are the Lessons Learnt from the Right to Food Case?” Livemint, March 20, 2017. www.livemint.com/Politics/IEBWhfvkvPCaQW6xky5TjO/What-are-the-lessons-learnt-from-the-Right-to-Food-case.html.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. 2005. “The Core of the Case against Judicial Review.” Yale Law Journal 115: 1346–1406.Google Scholar
Wilson, Bruce. 2009. “Institutional Reform and Rights Revolutions in Latin America: The Cases of Costa Rica and Colombia.” Journal of Politics in Latin America 1 (2): 59–85.Google Scholar
Wilson, Bruce, and Cordero, Juan Carlos Rodríguez. 2006. “Legal Opportunity Structures and Social Movements: The Effects of Institutional Change on Costa Rican Politics.” Comparative Political Studies 39 (3): 325–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414005281934.Google Scholar
Wilson, Stuart. 2011. “Litigating Housing Rights in Johannesburg’s Inner City: 2004–2008.” South African Journal on Human Rights 27 (1): 127–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/19962126.2011.11865008.Google Scholar
Yamin, Alicia Ely, and Gloppen, Siri, eds. 2011. Litigating Health Rights: Can Courts Bring More Justice to Health. Human Rights Program Practice Series. Cambridge, MA: Human Rights Program, Harvard Law School : Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Zemans, Frances Kahn. 1983. “Legal Mobilization: The Neglected Role of the Law in the Political System.” The American Political Science Review 77 (3): 690–703.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Sandra Botero, Universidad del Rosario, Colombia
  • Book: Courts that Matter
  • Online publication: 02 November 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009281973.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Sandra Botero, Universidad del Rosario, Colombia
  • Book: Courts that Matter
  • Online publication: 02 November 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009281973.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Sandra Botero, Universidad del Rosario, Colombia
  • Book: Courts that Matter
  • Online publication: 02 November 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009281973.009
Available formats
×