Cosmopolitanism in context: an introduction

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511761263.001

1 - Cosmopolitanism in context: an introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 December 2010

Roland Pierik and

Wouter Werner

Edited by

Roland Pierik and

Wouter Werner

Show author details

Roland Pierik: Affiliation:
Legal Theory and Legal Philosophy, Universiteit van Amsterdam
Wouter Werner: Affiliation:
International Law, VU University Amsterdam
Roland Pierik: Affiliation:
Universiteit van Amsterdam
Wouter Werner: Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam

Book contents

Get access

Summary

This book deals with the strained relationship between cosmopolitanism as a moral standard and the real existing institutions in which cosmopolitan ideals are to be implemented.

Cosmopolitanism is an age-old normative ideal which contends that all kosmopolitês, all citizens of the world, share a membership in one single community, the cosmopolis, which is governed by a universal and egalitarian law. Martha Nussbaum describes such cosmopolitans as persons “whose primary allegiance is to the worldwide community of human beings.” This cosmopolitan notion of a common humanity translates normatively into the idea that we have moral duties towards all human beings since “every human being has a global stature as the ultimate unit of moral concern.” From ancient philosophy onwards, the cosmopolis has been portrayed as a perfect order, guided by divine or natural reason, and contrasted to actual men-ruled polises that were failing ideals of justice and law. Cicero, for example, described true cosmopolitan law as:

right reason in agreement with nature; it is of universal application, unchanging and everlasting; it summons to duty by its commands, and averts from wrongdoing by its prohibitions … We cannot be freed from its obligations by senate or people, and we need not look outside ourselves for an expounder or interpreter of it.

In similar fashion, some contemporary cosmopolitan thinkers seek to ground cosmopolitanism on naturalist arguments, albeit with slight modifications and variations.

Type: Chapter
Information: Cosmopolitanism in Context
Perspectives from International Law and Political Theory
, pp. 1 - 16

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511761263.001 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Nussbaum, Martha, “Patriotism and Cosmopolitanism,” in For Love of Country: Debating the Limits of Patriotism, ed. Cohen, Joshua (Boston: Beacon Press, 1996), p. 4Google Scholar

Pogge, Thomas, World Poverty and Human Rights (Oxford: Polity Press, 2002), p. 169Google Scholar

Cicero, , De re publica, ed. Keyes, Clinton W. (Cambridge, Mass., London: Loeb Classical Library, 1977), p. 211 (§3.22)Google Scholar

Buchanan, Allen, Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination: Moral Foundations for International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004), p. 87Google Scholar

Tan, Kok-Chor, Justice without Borders: Cosmopolitanism, Nationalism and Patriotism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), p. 60CrossRef Google Scholar

Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971), p. 115Google Scholar

Beitz, Charles, Political Theory and International Relations, 2nd edn. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999), pp. 143–53Google Scholar

Simon Caney, Justice Beyond Borders: A Global Political Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), p. 4Google Scholar

Rawls, John, “Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory,” Journal of Philosophy 77, no. 9 (1980), p. 543CrossRef Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel, “Perpetual Peace,” in Political Writings, ed. Reiss, Hans (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), p. 94Google Scholar

Beitz, Charles, “Rawls's Law of Peoples,” Ethics 110, no. 4 (2000), p. 677CrossRef Google Scholar

Beitz, Charles, “International Liberalism and Distributive Justice: A Survey of Recent Thought,” World Politics 51, no. 2 (1999)CrossRef Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, “Legal Cosmopolitanism: Tom Franck's Messianistic World,” New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 35 (2003), p. 476Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah, Eichmann in Jerusalem. A Report on the Banality of Evil (London: Faber and Faber, 1963)Google Scholar

Pogge, Thomas, Realizing Rawls (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1989), p. 247Google Scholar

Buchanan, Allen, “Rawls's Law of Peoples: Rules for a Vanished Westphalian World,” Ethics 110, no. 4 (2000)CrossRef Google Scholar

Rawls, John, The Law of Peoples (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1999), pp. 115–20Google Scholar

Douzinas, Costas, Human Rights and Empire: The Political Philosophy of Cosmopolitanism (Routledge-Cavendish, 2007), p. 177 and p. 176 respectivelyGoogle Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, From Apology to Utopia, The Structure of International Legal Argument (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005)Google Scholar

Catherine, Lu, “The One and Many Faces of Cosmopolitanism,” The Journal of Political Philosophy 8, no. 2 (2000), p. 251Google Scholar

Meckled-Garcia, Saladin, “On the Very Idea of Cosmopolitan Justice: Constructivism and International Agency,” Journal of Political Philosophy 16, no. 3 (2008), p. 252CrossRef Google Scholar

Scheffler, Samuel, “Conceptions of Cosmopolitanism,” Utilitas 11 (1999)CrossRef Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy, “Minority Cultures and the Cosmopolitan Alternative,” in The Rights of Minority Cultures, ed. Kymlicka, Will (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995)Google Scholar

Appiah, Kwame Anthony, Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a World of Strangers (New York: W.W. Norton, 1996)Google Scholar

Book contents

1 - Cosmopolitanism in context: an introduction

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive