Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T15:05:26.782Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Cooperative Breeding in Naked Mole-Rats: Implications for Vertebrate and Invertebrate Sociality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2009

Nancy G. Solomon
Affiliation:
Miami University
Jeffrey A. French
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska, Omaha
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The naked mole-rat (Heterocephalus glaber) occupies an unusual place among social vertebrates. Like the other species considered in this volume, naked mole-rats are cooperative breeders. These small, virtually hairless rodents live in subterranean colonies in which nonreproductive individuals routinely groom, feed, and protect the offspring of reproductive colony members (Jarvis 1981, 1991; Lacey & Sherman 1991). At the same time, naked mole-rats are eusocial, meaning “truly social” (Batra 1966). Although this term has generally been reserved for insect societies (e.g., ants, termites, and some bee and wasp species) in which there is “cooperation in caring for the young, reproductive division of labor with more or less sterile individuals working on behalf of individuals engaged in reproduction, and overlap of at least two generations of life stages capable of contributing to colony labor” (Hölldobler & Wilson 1990, p. 638), H. glaber also exhibits these diagnostic characteristics. Consequently, evolutionary explanations for both cooperative breeding and eusociality must apply to naked mole-rats.

Although characterizing H. glaber as cooperatively breeding and eusocial seems redundant, this dual description is currently necessary because of the apparent divergence between studies of social evolution in vertebrates and invertebrates. Despite repeated attempts to draw attention to behavioral similarities between eusocial insects and cooperatively breeding birds and mammals (e.g., Vehrencamp 1979; Andersson 1984; Alexander, Noonan, & Crespi 1991; Emlen et al. 1991; Lacey & Sherman 1991; Krebs & Davies 1993), studies of vertebrate and invertebrate sociality have proceeded more or less independently.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×