We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 December 2017
General Conclusions
This study aimed to bring a fresh contribution to the already-existing debate surrounding European consumer contract law. It did so by directing the discussion on two different paths – a comparative substantive overview and a mirroring numerical analysis. Three methodological conclusions can be mentioned in the light of this effort, and they are presented in what follows.
(i) Identifying a gap in the present discussion about the harmonisation of European consumer law
Firstly, as highlighted in Chapter 1, the harmonisation discussion is by no means novel. An ever-growing body of literature proves an increased interest in the field of European contract law, or more specifically, European consumer law. Recent developments such as the adoption of the Consumer Rights Directive or the withdrawal of the CESL announce thought-provoking times for contract lawyers. However, the nature of consumer contract law in itself, as well as the ever-growing body of knowledge that disseminates it, create a highly complex field that becomes more and more difficult to grasp in its entirety.
Moreover, while many authors venture into analysing specific Directives or national legal regimes, the attention paid to comprehensively studying the legal convergence arising from European consumer developments is not directly proportionate. Little attention is paid to the extent to which harmonisation, as a specific policy pursued by the European Commission leads to legal convergence as the effect of this policy. What is more, it is safe to say that to date, with the exception of the Convergence Index included in this study, no measurement tool has been developed to quantitatively assess this extent. For this reason, a gap has been identified in the harmonisation debate as it currently stands.
(ii) Filling the gap by developing a self-standing method
Secondly, the present study aims to fill the aforementioned gap. By developing a methodology that helps establish whether and to what extent there is convergence of laws in the field of European consumer contract law, this study wishes to further the academic and policy debates on the effects of European legislative design.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.
