Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T08:00:37.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Appendix 2 - Coding rules

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2016

Barbara Koremenos
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Get access

Summary

Below I briefly describe the coding of high or low for the seven cooperation problems not discussed in detail in the text. Recall a coding of low does not imply the cooperation problem is not present; rather, a coding of low simply implies the cooperation problem is not severe enough to meet the threshold for high. I also explain how the actor characteristics were measured. Identification of the various design provisions is detailed in the chapters devoted to them in Parts II and III.

Enforcement problems: For this problem to be coded as high, coders had to establish that free-riding on another's cooperation, that is, choosing to defect while another cooperated, would make at least some subset of states better off than mutual cooperation. Another way of looking at this is asking whether, if one state defects, the other state wants to defect as well or whether it could be just as well off continuing to cooperate. Arms control is typically characterized by an underlying Enforcement problem for at least some subset of states. Coders could easily make the case that limiting some kind of weapon while one's partner cheated was not in a state's interest. This argument is not compelling for women and children's rights. If one's partner starts to defect by eliminating the right to vote for women, it is easy to make the case that the best response for the state left cooperating is to continue to cooperate – that is, to continue to give women the right to vote. In other words, that issue area is not well described by the prisoners’ dilemma game structure. Additionally, a prominent theme in liberal approaches to international law is the idea of the two-level game (Putnam 1988), which highlights the presence of differentiated “state” actors on the international and domestic scenes, and in particular that governments may have incomplete control over domestic agents. For instance, firms affected by environmental agreements or labor standards will have incentives different from those of the government. COIL acknowledges the existence of such two-level problems in its coding of underlying Enforcement problems because sub-state actors whose behavior is governed may have incentives to defect even if the national government does not.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Continent of International Law
Explaining Agreement Design
, pp. 371 - 376
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Coding rules
  • Barbara Koremenos, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • Book: The Continent of International Law
  • Online publication: 05 June 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316415832.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Coding rules
  • Barbara Koremenos, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • Book: The Continent of International Law
  • Online publication: 05 June 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316415832.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Coding rules
  • Barbara Koremenos, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • Book: The Continent of International Law
  • Online publication: 05 June 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316415832.016
Available formats
×