Book contents
- Reviews
- Constitutionalism in Context
- Comparative Constitutional Law and Policy
- Constitutionalism in Context
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents by Topic
- Contents by Region
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- User’s Guide and Preface
- Abbreviations
- I Introduction to the Field
- II Concepts and Definitions
- III Constitutional Drafting and Revision
- IV Constitutional Adjudication and Interpretation
- V Rights
- 12 Social and Economic Rights: Argentina
- 13 LGBTQ Rights: Singapore
- 14 Indigenous Rights: New Zealand
- 15 Citizenship and Nationality: Cyprus
- 16 Affirmative Action: Brazil
- VI Structure
- VII Challenges to Liberal Democratic Constitutionalism
- Index
- References
13 - LGBTQ Rights: Singapore
from V - Rights
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 February 2022
- Reviews
- Constitutionalism in Context
- Comparative Constitutional Law and Policy
- Constitutionalism in Context
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents by Topic
- Contents by Region
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- User’s Guide and Preface
- Abbreviations
- I Introduction to the Field
- II Concepts and Definitions
- III Constitutional Drafting and Revision
- IV Constitutional Adjudication and Interpretation
- V Rights
- 12 Social and Economic Rights: Argentina
- 13 LGBTQ Rights: Singapore
- 14 Indigenous Rights: New Zealand
- 15 Citizenship and Nationality: Cyprus
- 16 Affirmative Action: Brazil
- VI Structure
- VII Challenges to Liberal Democratic Constitutionalism
- Index
- References
Summary
In recent years, LGBTQ rights have scored a number of high-profile legislative and judicial successes around the world, including the legal recognition of same-sex relationships and non-binary gender identities. However, the advancement of LGBTQ rights still faces significant obstacles in many jurisdictions, even when it comes to basic issues such as the decriminalization of homosexual relations. This chapter focuses on the case of Singapore to examine the politics of LGBTQ rights, and, in particular, the ways in which activists interpret and respond to challenging structural conditions. Based on the author’s fieldwork, and written from both socio-legal and constitutional law perspectives, the chapter analyzes why LGBTQ rights activists who had long avoided rights litigation changed their minds and brought a constitutional challenge against the criminalization of same-sex relations, the outcomes of the litigation campaign, and the future of LGBTQ rights in Singapore.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Constitutionalism in Context , pp. 281 - 302Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022