Book contents
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 August 2023
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Constitution of Political EconomyPolity, Society and the Commonweal, pp. 224 - 258Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Ades, A. and Di Tella, R. (1997) ‘National Champions and Corruption: Some Unpleasant Interventionist Arithmetic’, The Economic Journal, 107 (443), pp. 1023–1042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adger, W. N. (2006) ‘Vulnerability’, Global Environmental Change, 16 (3), pp. 268–281.Google Scholar
Aftalion, A. (1927) ‘The Theory of Economic Cycles Based on the Capitalistic Technique of Production’, Review of Economic Statistics (then Review of Economics and Statistics), 9 (4), pp. 165–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aftalion, A. (1929) Monnaie et industrie: les grands problèmes de l’heure présente, Paris, Librairie du Recueil Sirey.Google Scholar
Aiginger, K. and Rodrik, D. (2020) ‘Rebirth of Industrial Policy and an Agenda for the Twenty-First Century’, Journal of Industrial Competition and Trade, 20, pp. 189–207.Google Scholar
Ainsworth, S. U. (1999) ‘Strategic Foundation for the Cooperators’ Advantage’, Theory and Decision, 47 (2), pp. 101–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Althusius, J. (1603) Politica Methodice Digesta et Exemplis Sacris et Profanis Illustrata, Herborn, Christoff Rab.Google Scholar
Althusius, J. (1932 [1614]) Politica methodice digesta of Johannes Althusius, reprinted from the third edition of 1614 and augmented by the preface to the first edition of 1603 and by 21 hitherto unpublished letters of the author, ed. Friedrich, C. J., Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Amable, B. (2018) ‘Economic Policy’, in Cardinale, I. and Scazzieri, R. (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Political Economy, London, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 441–461.Google Scholar
Amadae, S. M. (2015) Prisoners of Reason: Game Theory and Neoliberal Political Economy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ames, E. and Rosenberg, N. (1963) ‘Changing Technological Leadership and Industrial Growth’, The Economic Journal, 73 (1), pp. 214–236.Google Scholar
Ames, E. and Rosenberg, N. (1965) ‘The Progressive Division and Specialization of Industries’, The Journal of Development Studies, 1 (4), pp. 363–383.Google Scholar
Amsden, A. (1997) ‘Bringing Production Back in: Understanding Government’s Economic Role in Late Industrialization’, World Development, 25 (4), pp. 469–480.Google Scholar
Andreoni, A. (2014) ‘Structural Learning: Embedding Discoveries and the Dynamics of Production’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 29 (June), pp. 58–74.Google Scholar
Andreoni, A. (2016) ‘Varieties of Industrial Policy: Models, Packages, and Transformation Cycles’, in Noman, A. and Stiglitz, J. E. (eds.), Efficiency, Finance, and Varieties of Industrial Policy, New York and Chichester, West Sussex, Columbia University Press, pp. 245–305.Google Scholar
Andreoni, A. and Chang, H.-J. (2019) ‘The Political Economy of Industrial Policy: Structural Interdependencies, Policy Alignment and Conflict Management’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 48 (March), pp. 136–150.Google Scholar
Andreoni, A., Chang, H.-J., and Scazzieri, R. (2019) ‘Industrial Policy in Context: Building Blocks for an Integrated and Comparative Political Economy Agenda’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 48 (March), pp. 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreoni, A. and Scazzieri, R. (2014) ‘Triggers of Change: Structural Trajectories and Production Dynamics’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 38 (6, November), pp. 1391–1408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antràs, P., Davin, C., Thibault, F., and Russell, H. (2012) ‘Measuring the Upstreamness of Production and Trade Flows’, American Economic Review, 102, pp. 412–416.Google Scholar
Aoki, M. (2001) Toward a Comparative Institutional Analysis, Cambridge, MA and London, The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Archer, M. (2000) Being Human: The Problem of Agency, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Archer, M. (2010) ‘Critical Realism and Relational Sociology: Complementarity and Synergy’, Journal of Critical Realism, 9 (2), pp. 199–207.Google Scholar
Archer, M. (2012) The Reflexive Imperative in Late Modernity, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (1972) Politics (ms fourth century BC), with an English translation by H. Rackham, London, Heinemann; Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Arora, A., Landau, R., and Rosenberg, N. (1999) ‘Dynamics of Comparative Advantage in the Chemical Industry’, in Mowery, D. C. and Nelson, R. R. (eds.), Sources of Industrial Leadership: Studies of Seven Industries, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 217–266.Google Scholar
Arrow, K. J. (1972 [1951]) Social Choice and Individual Values, New Haven and London, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Arrow, K. J. (2008) ‘Arrow’s Theorem’, in Durlauf, S. and Blume, L. (eds.), The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, London, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 1, pp. 124–126.Google Scholar
Arrow, K. J., Sen, A. K., and Suzumura, K. (eds.) (1996) Social Choice Re-examined, Proceedings of the IEA Conference Held at Schloss Hernstein, Berndorf, Vienna, Basingstoke, Macmillan; New York, St. Martin’s Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Audegean, P. (2010) La philosophie de Beccaria. Savoir punir, savoir écrire, savoir produire, Paris, Librairie Philosophique Vrin.Google Scholar
Baas, N. A. (1994) ‘Emergence, Hierarchies and Hyperstructures’, Artificial Life III, Proceedings, ed. C. G. Langton, Addison-Wesley/Santa Fe Institute in the Sciences of Complexity, vol. xvii, pp. 515–537.Google Scholar
Babbage, C. (1835) On the Economy of Machinery and Manufactures, 4th edition, London, Charles Knight.Google Scholar
Bacharach, M. (2006) Beyond Individual Choice: Teams and Frames in Game Theory, Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Baldwin, R. E. (1969) ‘The Case against Infant-Industry Tariff Protection’, Journal of Political Economy, 77 (3), pp. 295–305.Google Scholar
Baldwin, R. E. (1989) ‘The Political Economy of Trade Policy’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3 (4, Fall), pp. 119–135.Google Scholar
Barabási, A. L. (2007) ‘The Architecture of Complexity’, IEEE Control Systems Magazine, August, pp. 33–42.Google Scholar
Barabási, A.-L. and Albert, R. (1999) ‘Emerging of Scaling in Random Networks’, Science, 286 (5439), pp. 509–512.Google Scholar
Baranzini, M. (1991) A Theory of Wealth, Distribution and Accumulation, Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Baranzini, M. and Scazzieri, R. (1990) ‘Economic Structure: Analytical Perspectives’, in Baranzini, M. and Scazzieri, R. (eds.), The Economic Theory of Structure and Change, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 227–333.Google Scholar
Baranzini, M. and Scazzieri, R. (1997) ‘Profit and Rent in a Model of Capital Accumulation and Structural Dynamics’, in Arestis, P., Palma, G., Sawyer, M. C., Sardoni, C., and Kriesler, P. (eds.), Essays in Honour of Geoffrey Harcourt, London and New York, Routledge, vol. I, pp. 121–132.Google Scholar
Bauer, P. (1971) Dissent on Development: Studies and Debates in Development Economics, London, Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Beccaria, C. (1971a [1770]) Ricerche intorno alla natura dello stile, in Beccaria, C., Opere, ed. S. Romagnoli, Firenze, Sansoni, vol. I, pp. 197–336.Google Scholar
Beccaria, C. (1971b [ms circa 1769]) ‘Elementi di economia pubblica’, in Beccaria, C., Opere, ed. S. Romagnoli, Firenze, Sansoni, vol. I, pp. 383–649.Google Scholar
Beccaria, C. (1971c [ms. circa 1768]) ‘Pensieri sopra la barbarie e coltura delle nazioni e su lo stato selvaggio dell’uomo’, in Beccaria, C., Opere, ed. S. Romagnoli, Firenze, Sansoni, vol. II, pp. 802–809.Google Scholar
Beccaria, C. (1971d [ms. circa 1768]) ‘Pensieri sopra le usanze ed i costumi’, in Beccaria, C., Opere, ed. S. Romagnoli, Firenze, Sansoni, vol. II, pp. 810–822.Google Scholar
Beccaria, C. (1986 [1762]) ‘Del disordine e de’ rimedj delle monete nello Stato di Milano nell’anno 1762’, in Sul disordine delle monete a Milano nel Settecento, tre saggi di Cesare Beccaria e Pietro Verri, Introduzione di A. Quadrio Curzio e R. Scazzieri, Quadri storici di M. Bortolotti e B. Cereghini, pp. 49–100.Google Scholar
Bellino, E. (2018) ‘Viability, Reproducibility and Returns in Production Price Systems’, Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, 35(3), pp. 845–861.Google Scholar
Berlin, I. (1969) ‘Two Concepts of Liberty’, in Four Essays on Liberty, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 118–172.Google Scholar
Bernstein, L. (2013) ‘Merchant Law in a Modern Economy’, The University of Chicago Law School, Coase-Sandor Institute for Law and Economics Working Paper No. 639.Google Scholar
Bessant, J. and Haywood, B. (1986) ‘Flexibility in Manufacturing Systems’, Omega: The International Journal of Management Science, 14(6), pp. 465–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Best, M. (2018) How Growth Really Happens: The Making of Economic Miracles by Production, Governance, and Skills, Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Best, M. (2019) ‘Industrial Innovation and Productive Structures: The Creation of America’s “Arsenal of Democracy”’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 48 (March), pp. 32–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhagwati, J. (1982) ‘Directly Unproductive Profit-Seeking (DUP) Activities’, Journal of Political Economy, 90 (5), pp. 988–1002.Google Scholar
Bianchi, P. (1992) ‘Teoria dell’impresa, dinamiche innovative e mutamento istituzionale’, Economia e banca, 14 (2), pp. 205–222.Google Scholar
Bianchi, P. and Labory, S. (2018) ‘The Political Economy of Industry’, in Cardinale, I. and Scazzieri, R. (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Political Economy, London, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 463–488.Google Scholar
Bianchi, P. and Labory, S. (2019) ‘Manufacturing Regimes and Transitional Paths: Lessons for Industrial Policy’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 48 (March), pp. 24–31.Google Scholar
Bianchi, P. and Miller, L. M. (1996) ‘Innovation and Collective Action: The Dynamics of Change’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 7 (June), pp. 193–206.Google Scholar
Bielefeld, J. F. (1760) Institutions Politiques, Paris, Chés Samuel et Jean Luchtmans.Google Scholar
Black, A. (1984) Guilds and Civil Society in European Political Thought from the Twelfth Century to the Present, London, Methuen.Google Scholar
Blank, A. (2021) ‘Pufendorf and Leibniz on Duties of Esteem in Diplomatic Relations’, Journal of International Political Theory, first published online on 18 March 2021, https://doi.org/10.1177/17550882211002225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaug, M. (1997) Economic Theory in Retrospect, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blyth, M. (2013) Austerity: The History of a Dangerous Idea, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boisguillebert, P. de (1843 [1707a]) ‘Dissertation sur la nature des richesses’, in Daire, E. (ed.), Economistes financiers du XVIIIe siècle, Paris, Guillaumin, pp. 394–424.Google Scholar
Boisguillebert, P. de (1843 [1707b]) ‘Factum de la France’, in Daire, E. (ed.), Economistes financiers du XVIIIe siècle, Paris, Guillaumin, pp. 267–351.Google Scholar
Bonar, J. (1992 [1893]) Philosophy and Political Economy, with a new introduction by Warren J. Samuels, New Brunswick, NJ and London, Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Bortis, H. (1996) Institutions, Behaviour and Economic Theory: A Contribution to Classical-Keynesian Political Economy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boucher, D. (1991) ‘The Character of the History of the Philosophy of International Relations and the Case of Edmund Burke’, Review of International Studies, 17 (1), pp. 127–148.Google Scholar
Bouniatian, M. (1922) Les crises économiques, Essai de morphologie et théorie des crises économiques périodiques et de théorie de la conjoncture économique, Paris, Giard.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (2005) The Social Structures of the Economy, Cambridge and Malden, MA, Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (2012) Sur l’État. Cours au Collège de France 1989–1992, Paris, Raisons d’Agir/Seuil.Google Scholar
Bruni, L. and Zamagni, S. (2004) Economia civile. Efficienza, equità, felicità pubblica, Bologna, Il Mulino; English Translation: Bruni, L. and Zamagni, S. (2007) Civil Economy, Oxford, Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Bruni, L. and Zamagni, S. (2016) Civil Economy: Another Idea of the Market, Newcastle upon Tyne and New York, Agenda Publishing/Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. M. (1990) ‘The Domain of Constitutional Political Economy’, Constitutional Political Economy, 1 (1), pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
Burke, E. (1791) An Appeal from the New to the Old Whigs, in Consequence of Some Late Discussions in Parliament, Relative to the Reflections on the French Revolution, 3rd edition, London, J. Dodsley.Google Scholar
Burke, E. (1792) ‘On a Motion for leave to bring in a Bill to repeal and alter certain Acts respecting Religious Opinions’ (May 11, 1792)’, in E. Burke, Works, London, Henry Frowde/ Oxford University Press 1906, The World’s Classics series, vol. Ill.Google Scholar
Burke, E. (1991 [1782]) ‘Letter to Sir Hercules Langrishe’, in The Writings and Speeches of Edmund Burke, Vol. 9, ed. McDowell, R. B. and W. B. Todd, , Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 601–628.Google Scholar
Burke, E. (1993 [1759]) A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful, 2nd edition, Part One, Sections VI–XIX, in Harris, I. (ed.), Burke: Pre-Revolutionary Writings, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 63–77.Google Scholar
Burke, E. (2014 [1790]) Reflections on the Revolution in France, in Hampsher-Monk, Ian, ed., Burke: Revolutionary Writings, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–250.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (1834 [1736]) The Analogy of Religion, Natural and Revealed, to the Constitution and Course of Nature, London, J. and P. Knapton, reprint of 2nd corrected edition. [This corrected edition appeared in the same year as the initial imprint and included the two dissertations – “Of Personal Identity” and “Of the Nature of Virtue”.]Google Scholar
Buzan, B. and Little, R. (2000) International Systems in World History: Remaking the Study of International Relations, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cai, J. and Harrison, A. (2021) ‘Industrial Policy in China: Some Intended or Unintended Consequences?’ ILR Review, 74(1), pp. 163–198.Google Scholar
Callanan, K. (2018) Montesquieu’s Liberalism and the Problem of Universal Politics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Caputo, M. (2019) Memory, Mathematics and Economics, Roma, Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Memorie, series IX, volume XL, n. 1.Google Scholar
Cardinale, I. (2015) ‘Towards a Structural Political Economy of Resources’, in Baranzini, M., Rotondi, C., and Scazzieri, R. (eds.), Resources, Production and Structural Dynamics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 198–210.Google Scholar
Cardinale, I. (2017) ‘Sectoral Interest and “Systemic Interest”: Towards a Structural Political Economy of the Eurozone’, in Cardinale, I., Coffman, D., and Scazzieri, R. (eds.), The Political Economy of the Eurozone, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 216–237.Google Scholar
Cardinale, I. (2018a) ‘Structural Political Economy’, in Cardinale, I. and Scazzieri, R. (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Political Economy, London, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 769–784.Google Scholar
Cardinale, I. (2018b) ‘Beyond Constraining and Enabling: Toward New Microfoundations for Institutional Theory’, Academy of Management Review, 43 (1), pp. 132–155.Google Scholar
Cardinale, I. (2018c) ‘A Bridge over Troubled Water: A Structural Political Economy of Vertical Integration’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 46 (September), pp. 172–179.Google Scholar
Cardinale, I. (2018d) ‘Time Horizons and Human Activities: A Position Paper’, Balzan Papers, I, pp. 235–257.Google Scholar
Cardinale, I. (2019) ‘Microfoundations of Institutions and the Theory of Action’, Academy of Management Review, 44 (2), pp. 467–470.Google Scholar
Cardinale, I. (2020) ‘Structural Political Economy: Particular Interests, Systemic Interests and the Structure of Division of Labour’, Rendiconti, Classe di Scienze Morali, Storiche e Filologiche, Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, serie ix, vol. xxxi, pp. 257–274.Google Scholar
Cardinale, I. (2022) ‘Vulnerability, Resilience and “Systemic Interest”: A Connectivity Approach’, Networks and Spatial Economics, 22 (April), pp. 691–707.Google Scholar
Cardinale, I. and Coffman, D.. (2014) ‘Economic Interdependencies and Political Conflict: The Political Economy of Taxation in Eighteenth-Century Britain’, Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, 31 (3), pp. 277–300.Google Scholar
Cardinale, I., Coffman, D., and Scazzieri, R. (2017a) ‘Framing the Political Economy of the Eurozone: Structural Heuristics for Analysis and Policy’, in Cardinale, I., Coffman, D., and Scazzieri, R. (eds.), The Political Economy of the Eurozone, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 483–551.Google Scholar
Cardinale, I., Coffman, D., and Scazzieri, R. (2017b) ‘The Eurozone as a Political Economy Field’, in Cardinale, I., Coffman, D., and Scazzieri, R. (eds.), The Political Economy of the Eurozone, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–33.Google Scholar
Cardinale, I. and Landesmann, M. (2017) ‘Exploring Sectoral Conflicts of Interest in the Eurozone. A Structural Political Economy Approach’, in Cardinale, I., Coffman, D., and Scazzieri, R. (eds.), The Political Economy of the Eurozone, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 284–336.Google Scholar
Cardinale, I. and Landesmann, M. (2022) ‘Generalising the Political Economy of Structural Change: A Structural Political Economy Approach’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 61 (June), pp. 546–558.Google Scholar
Cardinale, I. and Scazzieri, R. (2013) ‘Structural Liquidity: Time Coordination of Economic Activities and Sectoral Interdependence’, paper presented at Cambridge Finance Workshop, Newnham College, 5 February 2013.Google Scholar
Cardinale, I. and Scazzieri, R. (2016) ‘Structural Liquidity: The Money-Industry Nexus’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 39 (December), pp. 46–53.Google Scholar
Cardinale, I. and Scazzieri, R. (2017) ‘Beyond “Austerity vs. Expansion”: Elements for a Structural Theory of Liquidity Policy’, Revue d'économie industrielle, 160 (4), pp. 107–136.Google Scholar
Cardinale, I. and Scazzieri, R. (2018a) ‘Political Economy: Outlining a Field’, in Cardinale, I. and Scazzieri, R. (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Political Economy. London, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardinale, I. and Scazzieri, R. (2018b) ‘Political Economy as Theory of Society’, in Cardinale, I. and Scazzieri, R. (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Political Economy. London, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 787–815.Google Scholar
Cardinale, I. and Scazzieri, R. (2019) ‘Explaining Structural Change: Actions and Transformations’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 51 (December), pp. 393–404.Google Scholar
Cerniglia, F. and Saraceno, F. (eds.) (2019) A European Public Investment Outlook, Cambridge, Open Book Publishers.Google Scholar
Cesa, M. (2004) Machiavelli on International Relations, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chandler, A. D. Jr. (1977) The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business, Cambridge, MA., The Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Chang, H.-J. (1993) The Political Economy of Industrial Policy, London, Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Chang, H.-J. (2003) Kicking Away the Ladder: Development Strategy in Historical Perspective, London, Anthem Press.Google Scholar
Chang, H.-J. and Andreoni, A. (2020) ‘Industrial Policy in the 21st Century’, Development and Change, 561 (1, March), pp. 324–351.Google Scholar
Chaudhuri, K. N. (1985) Trade and Civilisation in the Indian Ocean: An Economic History from the Rise of Islam to 1750, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chochoy, N. (2015) ‘Karl Polanyi et l’encastrement politique de l’économie: pour une analyse systémique des rapports changeants entre économie et société’, Revue française de socio-économie, 1, pp. 153–173.Google Scholar
Coffman, D. (2021) ‘François Quesnay, Luigi Pasinetti and the Historical Contexts of Economic Theory’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 56 (March), pp. 64–73.Google Scholar
Cohendet, P., Ledoux, M.J., and Zuscovitch, E. (eds.) (1988a) New Advanced Materials: Economic Dynamics and European Strategy. A Report from the FAST Programme of the Commission of the European Communities, Berlin and Heidelberg, Springer.Google Scholar
Cohendet, P., Ledoux, M.J., and Zuscovitch, E. (1988b) ‘“Inter-materials” Variety and the Overchoice Phenomenon’, in Cohendet, P., Ledoux, M.J., and Zuscovitch, E.(eds.), New Advanced Materials, Berlin and Heidelberg, Springer, pp. 74–91, https://doi.org/10.1007/978–3-642–73809–8_8Google Scholar
Collini, S., Winch, D., and Burrow, J. (1983) That Noble Science of Politics: A Study in Nineteenth-Century Intellectual History, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Collins, G. M. (2020) Commerce and Manners in Edmund Burke’s Political Economy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Collison Black, R. D, Coats, R. W., Crauford, D., and Goodwin, W. (eds.) (1973) The Marginal Revolution in Economics, Durham, NC, Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Constant, B. (1818–1819) Collection complète des ouvrages publiés sur le Gouvernement representatif et la Constitution actuelle de la France, formant une espèce de Cours de politique constitutionnelle, Paris, de l’imprimerie de Mme Jeunehomme-Cremière.Google Scholar
Costabile, L. (2012) ‘Scuola Napoletana’, in Negri Zamagni, V. and Porta, P. L. (eds.), Il contributo italiano alla storia del pensiero. Economia, Roma, Istituto dell’Enciclopedia Italiana, pp. 240–251.Google Scholar
Costabile, L. (2015) ‘Le radici del pensiero economico italiano: Napoli e l’Europa’, in L. Lunghini, Costabile G., Curzio, A. Quadrio, Roncaglia, A., and Scazzieri, R. (eds.), Gli economisti italiani. Protagonisti, paradigmi, politiche, Roma, Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Atti dei Convegni Lincei n. 290, pp. 25–47.Google Scholar
Costabile, L. (2020) ‘La teoria politica della divisione del lavoro’, Rendiconti, Classe di Scienze Morali, Storiche e Filologiche, Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, serie ix, vol. xxxi, pp. 225–229.Google Scholar
Costabile, L. and Nappi, E. (2018) ‘The Public Banks of Naples between Financial Innovation and Crisis’, in Costabile, L. and Neal, L. (eds.), Financial Innovation and Resilience. Palgrave Studies in the History of Finance, Cham, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 17–53.Google Scholar
Costabile, L. and Scazzieri, R. (2008) ‘Social Models, Growth and Key Currencies’, in Costabile, L. (ed.), Institutions for Social Well-Being. Alternatives for Europe, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 126–151.Google Scholar
Coyle, D. (2018) ‘Platform Dominance: The Shortcomings of Antitrust Policy’, in Moore, M. and Tombini, D. (eds.), Digital Dominance: The Power of Google, Amazon, Facebook and Apple, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 50–70.Google Scholar
Coyle, D. (2019) ‘Practical Competition Policy Tools for Digital Platforms’, Antitrust Law Journal, 82 (3), pp. 835–860.Google Scholar
Coyle, D. (2020) Markets, State, and People. Economics for Public Policy, Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Crick, B. (1992) In Defence of Politics, 4th edition, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Croce, B. (1925) ‘Shaftesbury in Italia – con lettere inedite’, La Critica. Rivista di Letteratura, Storia e Filosofia, 23, pp. 1–27.Google Scholar
Crockett, A. D. (2000) ‘Marrying the Micro- and Macro-prudential Dimensions of Financial Stability’, Remarks before the Eleventh International Conference of Banking Supervisors, Basel, 20–21 September 2000.Google Scholar
Crouzet, F. (1990) Britain Ascendant: Comparative Studies in Franco-British Economic History, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cudworth, R. (1743 [1678]) The True Intellectual System of the Universe […], London, printed for J. Walthoe, D. Midwinter, etc.Google Scholar
Cumberland, R. (1672) De legibus naturae disquisitio philosophica, in qua elementa philosophiae hobbianae cum moralis tum civilis considerantur et refutantur, London, Flesher.Google Scholar
D’Addio, M. (1954) L’idea del contratto sociale dai sofisti alla riforma e il “De Principatu” di Mario Salamonio, Milano, Giuffré.Google Scholar
Daalder, H. (1966) ‘The Netherlands: Opposition in a Segmented Society’, in Dahl, R. A. (ed.), Political Opposition in Western Democracies. New Haven, Yale University Press, pp. 188–236.Google Scholar
Dagum, C. (1969) ‘Structural Permanence: Its Role in the Analysis of Structural Dualisms and Dependences and for Prediction and Decision Purposes’, Zeitschrift für die Gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 125, pp. 211–235. (Also published in Hagemann, H., Landesmann, M., and Scazzieri, R. (eds.), The Economics of Structural Change: Vol. I. Economic Structure and Change: Concepts and Theories, Cheltenham and Northampton, MA, Edward Elgar, Vol. 2, pp. 377–401.)Google Scholar
Darwall, S. (2006) The Second-Person Standpoint. Morality, Respect and Accountability, Cambridge, MA and London, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Daunton, M. (2010) ‘From Bretton Woods to Havana: Multilateral Deadlocks in Historical Perspective’, in Narlikar, A. (ed.), Deadlocks in Multilateral Negotiations: Causes and Solutions, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 47–78.Google Scholar
Daunton, M. (2018) ‘International Political Economy’, in I. Cardinale and R. Scazzieri (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Political Economy, London, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 605–655.Google Scholar
David, P. (1994) ‘Why Are Institutions the “Carriers of History”? Path Dependence and the Evolution of Conventions, Organizations and Institutions’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 5 (December), pp. 205–220.Google Scholar
de Finetti, B. (1979) ‘Due lezioni su “teoria delle decisioni”’, in Contributi del Centro Linceo interdisciplinare di scienze matematiche e loro applicazioni, n. 6, Seminari su La scienza dei sistemi, parte seconda, pp. 643–656.Google Scholar
Deane, P. (1980) The First Industrial Revolution, 2nd edition, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Deleersnyder, J.-L., Hodgson, T. J., Muller, H., and O’Grady, P. J. (1989) ‘Kanban Controlled Pull Systems: An Analytic Approach’, Management Science, 35 (9, September), pp. 1079–1091.Google Scholar
Di Battista, F. (2007) ‘L’economia civile genovesiana e la moderna economia politica’, in Jossa, B., Patalano, R., and Zagari, E. (eds.), Genovesi economista. Nel 250o anniversario dell’istituzione della cattedra di ‘commercio e meccanica’, Atti del Convegno di Studi di Napoli del 5–6 maggio 2005, Napoli, Istituto Italiano per gli Studi Filosofici, pp. 291–315.Google Scholar
Di Tommaso, M. and Tassinari, M. (2017) Industria, governo, mercato. Lezioni americane, Bologna, Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Di Tommaso, M. R., Tassinari, M., Barbieri, E., and Marozzi, M. (2020) ‘Selective Industrial Policy and “Sustainable” Structural Change: Discussing the Political Economy of Sectoral Priorities in the US’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 54 (September), pp. 309–323.Google Scholar
Dobb, M. H. (1973) Theories of Value and Distribution since Adam Smith: Ideology and Economic Theory. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Donati, P. (2006) ‘Il significato del paradigma relazionale per la comprensione e l’organizzazione della società: una visione “civile”’, in Donati, P. and Colozzi, I. (eds.), Il paradigma relazionale nelle scienze sociali: le prospettive sociologiche, Bologna, Il Mulino, pp. 51–113.Google Scholar
Donati, P. (2010) Relational Sociology: A New Paradigm for the Social Sciences, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Donati, P. and Archer, M. S. (2015) The Relational Subject, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Doria, P. M. (1729 [1709]) La vita civile, di Paolo-Mattia Doria, con un trattato della Educazione del principe, terza impressione, dall’autore ricorretta, e di molte aggiunzioni adornata, Napoli, Angelo Vocola a Fontana Medina.Google Scholar
Doria, P. M. (1981 [1740]) Del Commercio del Regno di Napoli. Con l’aggiunta di un’appendice. Nel quale s’indagano le cagioni generali e particolari, dalle quali il buono e retto Commercio trae la sua origine. E si fa vedere il rapporto che il predetto Commercio deve avere con gli altri Ordini, de’ quali la Repubblica si compone. Lettera diretta al Signor D. Francesco Ventura, Degnissimo Presidente del Magistrato di Commercio, in P. M. Doria, Manoscritti napoletani di Paolo Mattia Doria, vol. I, ed. C. Belgioioso, Galatina, Congedo, pp. 141–208.Google Scholar
Drolet, A. and Suppes, P. (2008) ‘The Good and the Bad, the True and the False’, in Galavotti, M. C., Scazzieri, R., and Suppes, P. (eds.), Reasoning, Rationality and Probability, Stanford, CA, CSLI Publications, pp. 13–35.Google Scholar
Dubois, V. (2018) ‘The Fields of Policy Making’, in Cardinale, I. and Scazzieri, R. (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Political Economy, London, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 29–51.Google Scholar
Dunn, J. (1990) ‘Introduction’, in Dunn, J. (ed.), The Economic Limits to Modern Politics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. (1902) De la division du travail social, 2nd edition, augmentée d’une préface sur les groupements professionels, Paris, Alcan.Google Scholar
Duso, G. (1996) ‘Sulla genesi del moderno concetto di società: la “consociatio” di Althusius e la “socialitas” di Pufendorf’, Filosofia politica, x (1, April), p. 5–31.Google Scholar
Edgeworth, F. (1881) Mathematical Psychics: An Essay on the Application of Mathematics to the Moral Sciences. London, C.K. Paul & Co.Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, J. (1999) Civil Society. The Critical History of an Idea, New York, New York University Press.Google Scholar
El Maraghy, H. and Caggiano, A. (2014) ‘Flexible Manufacturing System’, in Laperrière, L. and Reinhart, G. (eds.), The International Academy for Production Engineering, CIRP Encyclopedia of Production Engineering, Berlin and Heidelberg, Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978–3-642–20617–7_6554Google Scholar
Elazar, D. J. (1998) Constitutionalizing Globalization: The Postmodern Revival of Confederal Arrangements, Lanham, Boulder, New York, Oxford, Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
El-Khalil, R. and Darwish, Z. (2019) ‘Flexible Manufacturing Systems Performance in U.S. Automotive Manufacturing Plants: A Case Study’, Production Planning and Control, 30 (1), pp. 48–59.Google Scholar
Fairbank, J. (1941) ‘On the Ch’ing Tributary System’, Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies, 6 (2, June), pp. 135–246.Google Scholar
Ferguson, A. (1966 [1767]) An Essay on the History of Civil Society, Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, T. (1983) ‘Party Realignment and American Industrial Structure: The Investment Theory of Political Parties in Historical Perspective’, Research in Political Economy, 6, pp. 1–82.Google Scholar
Ferguson, T. (1995) Golden Rule: The Investment Theory of Party Competition and the Logic of Money-Driven Political Systems, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, T., Jorgensen, P., and Chen, J (2018) ‘Industrial Structure and Political Outcomes: The Case of the 2016 US Presidential Elections’, in Cardinale, I. and Scazzieri, R. (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Political Economy, London, Macmillan, pp. 333–440.Google Scholar
Ferguson, T., Jorgensen, P., and Chen, J. (2019) ‘How Money Drives US Congressional Elections: Linear Models of Money and Outcomes’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2019.09.005Google Scholar
Ferrannini, A., Barbieri, E., Biggeri, M., and Di Tommaso, M. R. (2021) ‘Industrial Policy for Sustainable Human Development in the Post-Covid19 Era’, World Development, 137 (January), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105215Google Scholar
Ferrarese, M. R. (2015) Diritto sconfinato. Inventiva giuridica e spazi nel mondo globale, Bari and Roma, Laterza.Google Scholar
Fidler, D. P. and Welsh, J. M. (eds.) (1999) Empire and Community: Edmund Burke’s Writings and Speeches on International Relations, Boulder, Westview Press.Google Scholar
Filangieri, G. (1806 [1780]) The Science of Legislation, from the Italian of Gaetano Filangieri, London, Thomas Ostell.Google Scholar
Fleischacker, S. (2005) On Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations: A Philosophical Companion, Princeton and Oxford, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fligstein, N. and McAdam, D. (2012) A Theory of Fields, New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Galli, C. (2010) Political Spaces and Global War, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Geertz, C. (1975) The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays, London, Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Gellner, E. (1994) Conditions of Liberty. Civil Society and Its Rivals, London, Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar
Genovesi, A. (1962 [1753]) ‘Discorso sopra il vero fine delle lettere e delle scienze [Discourse about the true ends of the arts and sciences]’ in Savarese, G. (ed.), A.Genovesi, Autobiografia. lettere e altri scritti, Milano, Feltrinelli, pp. 231–276.Google Scholar
Genovesi, A. (1973 [1766]) Della diceosina o sia della filosofia del giusto e dell’onesto [On the Philosophy of the Just and Honest], Milano, Marzorati.Google Scholar
Genovesi, A. (2013 [1765–1767]) Lezioni di economia civile, Introduction by L. Bruni and S. Zamagni, edited with textual commentary by F. Dal Degan, Milano, Vita e Pensiero.Google Scholar
Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1969) ‘Process in Farming versus Process in Manufacturing: A Problem in Balanced Development’, in Papi, G. U. and Nunn, C. (eds.), Economic Problems of Agriculture in Industrial Societies, New York, St. Martin’s Press, pp. 497–528.Google Scholar
Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1970) ‘The Economics of Production’, Richard T. Ely Lecture, The American Economic Review, 60 (2, May), pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1976 [1965]) ‘The Institutional Aspects of Peasant Communities: An Analytical View’, in Georgescu-Roegen, N., Energy and Economic Myths: Institutional and Analytical Economic Essays, New York, Oxford, etc., Pergamon Press, pp. 199–231.Google Scholar
Gierke, O. (1900) Political Theories of the Middle Ages, tr. F. W. Maitland, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gierke, O. (1973) Associations and the Law: The Classical and Early Christian Stages, tr. George Heinrich, Toronto, Toronto University Press.Google Scholar
Godbout, J. T. and Caillé, A. (1992) L’Esprit du don, Paris, La Découverte; trans. The World of the Gift, tr. D. Winkler, Montreal, McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Godbout, J. T. (2007) Ce qui circule entre nous. Donner, recevoir, rendre, Paris, Seuil.Google Scholar
Goitein, S. D. (1967) A Mediterranean Society: The Jewish Communities of the Arab World as Portrayed in the Documents of the Cairo Geniza. Vol. I; Economic Foundations, Berkeley and Los Angeles, University of California Press.Google Scholar
Goldoni, M. and Wilkinson, M. (2018) ‘The Material Constitution’, The Modern Law Review, 81 (4), pp. 567–597.Google Scholar
Green, D. P. and Shapiro, I. (1994) Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Political Science, New Haven, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Green, T. H. (1895) Lectures on the Principles of Political Obligation, London, Longmans & Co.Google Scholar
Griswold, C. L. (2007) Forgiveness: A Philosophical Exploration, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossi, P. (2010 [2007]) A History of European Law, Oxford, Blackwell (English translation of Grossi, 2007).Google Scholar
Grossi, P. (2009) ‘La legalità costituzionale nella storia del diritto moderno’, Atti della Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, vol. 156 – Rendiconti delle adunanze solenni, Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, 10 (9), pp. 603–621.Google Scholar
Grossi, P. (2021) ‘Sistema moderno delle fonti del diritto ed esperienza giuridica posmoderna in Italia’, Rivista internazionale di filosofia del diritto, 2 (April–June), pp. 155–176.Google Scholar
Guasti, N. (2006) ‘Antonio Genovesi’s Diceosina: Source of the Neapolitan Enlightenment’, History of European Ideas, 32 (4), pp. 385–405.Google Scholar
Guizot, F. (1839) Cours d’histoire moderne, Bruxelles, Société belge de librairie, etc. Hauman et compagnie.Google Scholar
Guizot, F. (1851) Histoire des origines du gouvernememt representatif en Europe, Bruxelles, Société typographique belge.Google Scholar
Haberler, G. (1964) ‘Integration and Growth of the World Economy in Historical Perspective’, The American Economic Review, 54 (2), pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
Hamilton, A., Madison, J., and Jay, J. (2003 [1788]) The Federalist with Letters of ‘Brutus’, ed. Ball, Terence, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hankins, J. (2019) Virtue Politics: Soulcraft and Statecraft in Renaissance Italy, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, D. and Simon, H. A. (1949) ‘Note: Some Conditions of Macroeconomic Stability’, Econometrica, 17 (3), pp. 245–248.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1976) Law, Legislation, and Liberty: Vol. 2. The Mirage of Social Justice, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1991 [1821]) Elements of the Philosophy of Right, ed. Allen, W. Wood, tr. H. B. Nisbet, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heller, A. (1988) ‘On Formal Democracy’, in Keane, J. (ed.), Civil Society and the State. New European Perspectives, London and New York, Verso, pp. 129–145.Google Scholar
Hicks, J. (1941) ‘Education in Economics’, Bulletin of the Manchester Statistical Society, April, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
Hicks, J. (1975) ‘The Scope and Status of Welfare Economics’, Oxford Economic Papers, new series, 27 (3), pp. 307–326.Google Scholar
Hicks, J. (1982 [1976]) ‘Revolutions in Economics’, in Hicks, J., Collected Essays in Economic Theory: Vol. III. Classics and Moderns. Oxford, Blackwell, pp. 3–16.Google Scholar
Hill, P. (1989) Development Economics on Trial: The Anthropological Case for a Prosecution, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschman, A. O. (1958) The Strategy of Economic Development, New Haven, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschman, A. O. (1977) The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism before Its Triumph, Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschman, A. O. (1982) Shifting Involvements: Private Interest and Public Action, Oxford, Robertson.Google Scholar
Hirschman, A. O. (1985) ‘Against Parsimony: Three Easy Ways of Complicating Some Categories of Economic Discourse’, Economics and Philosophy, 1 (1, April), pp. 7–21.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. (1647a) ‘Epistola dedicatoria’ to William Cavendish, Count of Devonshire, in Elementa philosophica de Cive, 2nd edition, Amsterdam, apud Ludovicum Elzevirium.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. (1647b) ‘Praefatio ad Lectores’, in Elementa philosophica de Cive, 2nd edition, Amsterdam, apud Ludovicum Elzevirium.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. (1998 [1642]) On the Citizen, ed. Tuck, R. and Silverthorne, M., Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. (1998 [1651]) Leviathan or the Matter, Forme and Power of a Commonwealth Ecclesiasticall and Civil, edited with an Introduction and Notes by Gaskin, J. C. A., Oxford and New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hobhouse, L. T. (1911b) Social Evolution and Political Theory, New York, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Hobhouse, L. T. (1922) The Elements of Social Justice, New York, Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
Holdsworth, W. S. (1903–1972 [1909]) A History of English Law, vol. 2, London, Methuen.Google Scholar
Hont, I. (2010), Jealousy of Trade: International Competition and the Nation-State in Historical Perspective, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hont, I. (2015), Politics in Commercial Society: Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Adam Smith, ed. Kapossy, Béla and Sonenscher, Michael, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1978 [1739–1740]) A Treatise of Human Nature, 2nd edition, edited, with an Analytical Index, by Selby-Bigge, L. A., with text revised and variant readings by P. H. Nidditch, Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1998 [1751]) An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals, ed. Beauchamp, T. L. (The Clarendon Edition of the Works of David Hume), Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Ibbetson, D. (1986) ‘Words and Deeds: The Action of Covenant in the Reign of Edward I’, Law and History Review, 4 (1, Spring), pp. 71–94.Google Scholar
Ibbetson, D. (2006) ‘English Law and the European Ius Commune, 1450–1650’, in Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 8, pp. 115–132.Google Scholar
Ibbetson, D. (2016) ‘Bologna and England: The Legal Heritage’, Guest Lecture, Bologna-Clare Hall Anniversary Meeting, 5 December 2016, University of Bologna, Palazzina della Viola.Google Scholar
Kaldor, N. (1967) Strategic Factors in Economic Development, Ithaca, New York State School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Kantorowicz, E. (1957) The King’s Two Bodies: A Study in Medieval Political Theology, Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kauffman, S. A. (1990) ‘Requirements for Evolvability in Complex Systems: Orderly Dynamics and Frozen Components’, Physica D, 4, pp. 135–152.Google Scholar
Keane, J. (1988) ‘Despotism and Democracy: The Origins and Development of the Distinction between Civil Society and the State 1750–1850’, in Keane, J. (ed.), Civil Society and the State. New European Perspectives, London and New York, Verso, pp. 35–71.Google Scholar
Kindleberger, C. P. (1978) Manias, Panics and Crashes, London and Basingstoke, Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kochen, M. (1980) ‘Coping with Complexity’, Omega: The International Journal of Management Science, 8 (1), pp. 11–20.Google Scholar
Kolm, S.-K. (2009) Macrojustice. The Political Economy of Fairness, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Krueger, A. O. (1990) ‘Government Failures in Development’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 4 (3), pp. 9–23.Google Scholar
Kyburg, H. E. and Man Teng, C. (2001) Uncertain Inference, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kyotaki, N. and Moore, J. (1997) ‘Credit Chains’, www.princeton.edu/~kiyotaki/papers/creditchains.pdfGoogle Scholar
La Vaissière, E. de (2004) Histoire des marchands sogdiens, 2nd edition, Paris, Institut des Hautes Etudes Chinoises.Google Scholar
Lake, D. A. (1999) ‘Global Governance: A Relational Contracting Approach’, in Prakash, A. and Hart, J. A. (eds.), Globalization and Governance, London and New York, Routledge, pp. 31–53.Google Scholar
Landes, D. (1965) ‘Technological Change and Industrial Development in Western Europe, 1750–1914’, Cambridge Economic History of Europe, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, vol. VI, pp. 274–310.Google Scholar
Landesmann, M. A. (1986) ‘Conceptions of Technology and the Production Process’, in Baranzini, M. and Scazzieri, R. (eds.), Foundations of Economics. Structures of Inquiry and Economic Theory, Oxford and New York, Basil Blackwell, pp. 281–310.Google Scholar
Landesmann, M. A. and Scazzieri, R. (1990) ‘Specification of Structure and Economic Dynamics’, in Baranzini, M. and Scazzieri, R. (eds.), The Economic Theory of Structure and Change, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 95–121.Google Scholar
Landesmann, M.A. and Scazzieri, R. (1993) ‘Commodity Flows and Productive Subsystems: An Essay in the Analysis of Structural Change’, in Baranzini, M. and Harcourt, G. C. (eds.), The Dynamics of the Wealth of Nations, London, Macmillan, pp. 209–245.Google Scholar
Landesmann, M. A. and Scazzieri, R. (1996) ‘Forms of Production Organisation: The Case of Manufacturing Processes’, in Landesmann, M. A. and Scazzieri, R. (eds.), Production and Economic Dynamics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 252–303.Google Scholar
Langholm, O. (1983) Wealth and Money in the Aristotelian Tradition: A Study in Scholastic Economic Sources, Bergen, Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Lee, K. and Lim, C. (2001) ‘Technological Regimes, Catching-Up and Leapfrogging: Findings from the Korean Industries’, Research Policy, 30 (1), pp. 459–483.Google Scholar
Leibniz, W. G. (1677) De jure suprematus, ac legationis Principum Germaniae, published under the pseudonym Furstenerius Caesar, [Amsterdam, D. Elzevier].Google Scholar
Leontief, W. (1928) ‘Die Wirtschaft als Kreislauf’, in Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik, 60, pp. 577–623; English translation: (1991) ‘The Economy as a Circular Flow’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 2 (June), pp. 181–212.Google Scholar
Leontief, W. (1941) The Structure of the American Economy, 1919–29. New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leshem, D. (2016) ‘Retrospectives: What Did the Ancient Greeks Mean by “Oikonomia”?’ Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(1, Winter), pp. 225–238.Google Scholar
Leshem, D. (2013) ‘Oikonomia Redefined’, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 35 (1, March), pp. 43–61.Google Scholar
Lijphart, A. (1969) ‘Consociational Democracy’, World Politics, 21 (2, January), pp. 207–225.Google Scholar
Lijphart, A. (1975 [1968]) The Politics of Accommodation: Pluralism and Democracy in The Netherlands, 2nd revised edition, Berkeley, University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lijphart, A. (1977) Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration, New Haven, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lijphart, A. (2012) Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries, 2nd edition, New Haven, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Liu, E. (2019) ‘Industrial Policies in Production Networks’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 134 (4, November), pp. 1883–1948.Google Scholar
Locke, J. (1988 [1690]) Two Treatises of Government, ed. Laslett, P., Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lohmann, S. (2008) ‘Rational Choice and Political Science’, in Durlauf, S. and Blume, L. E. (eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd edition, vol. 6, Basingstoke and New York, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 866–872.Google Scholar
McCormick, J. P. (2007) Weber, Habermas and Transformations of the European State: Constitutional, Social, and Supranational Democracy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Machiavelli, N. (1988 [1532]) The Prince, ed. Skinner, Q. and Price, R., Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Machiavelli, N. (1996 [1531]) Discourses on Livy, tr. H. C. Mansfield and N. Tarcov, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McLean, I. (1991) ‘Rational Choice and Politics’, Political Studies, 39(3), pp. 496–512.Google Scholar
McNeil, I. R. (1978) ‘Contracts: Adjustment of Long-Term Economic Relations under Classical, Neoclassical and Relational Contract Law’, Northwestern University Law Review, 72 (6, January–February), pp. 854–905.Google Scholar
McNeil, I. R. (1985) ‘Reflections on Relational Contract’, Zeitschrift Für Die Gesamte Staatswissenschaft/Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 141 (4), pp. 541–546.Google Scholar
McNeil, I. R. (2000) ‘Relational Contract Theory: Challenges and Queries’, Northwestern University Law Review, 94 (3), pp. 877–907.Google Scholar
MacPherson, C. B. (1962) The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke, Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Magni-Berton, R. (2014) ‘Rational Choice Theory in Comparative Politics’, Revue internationale de politique comparée, 21 (2), pp. 19–47.Google Scholar
Maifreda, G. (2012) From Oikonomia to Political Economy: Constructing Economic Knowledge from the Renaissance to the Scientific Revolution, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Maitland, F. W. (2003) State, Trust and Corporation, ed. Runciman, D. and Ryan, M., Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Malloy, R. P. (2022) Law and the Invisible Hand: A Theory of Adam Smith’s Jurisprudence, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mamalakis, M. (1969) ‘The Theory of Sectoral Clashes’, Latin American Research Review, 4(3), pp. 9–46.Google Scholar
Mamalakis, M. (1992) ‘Sectoral Conflicts in the U.S. and the Soviet Union: A Mesoeconomic Analysis’, Eastern Economic Journal, 18(4), pp. 421–28.Google Scholar
Manent, P. (2013) Metamorphoses of the City: On the Western Dynamic, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Marcialis, M. T. (1994) ‘Legge di natura e calcolo della ragione nell’ultimo Genovesi’, Materiali per una storia della cultura giuridica, xxiv (2, December), pp. 315–340.Google Scholar
Marcialis, M. T. (1999) ‘Antonio Genovesi e la costruzione scientifica dell’ economia civile’, in Marcialis, M. T. (ed.), Ragione, natura, storia: quattro studi sul Settecento, Milano, Angeli, pp. 103–134.Google Scholar
Markusen, J. R. and Venables, A. J. (2000) ‘The Theory of Endowment, Intra-Industry and Multi-National Trade’, Journal of International Economics, 52 (2, December), pp. 209–234.Google Scholar
Marshall, A. and Paley Marshall, M. (1879) The Economics of Industry, London, Macmillan.Google Scholar
Martin, J. L. (2003) ‘What Is Field Theory?’ American Journal of Sociology, 109 (1), pp. 1–49.Google Scholar
Marzetti Dall’Aste Brandolini, S. (2011) ‘Moral Good and Right Conduct: A General Theory of Welfare under Fundamental Uncertainty’, in Marzetti Dall’Aste Brandolini, S. and Scazzieri, R. (eds.), Fundamental Uncertainty, Rationality and Plausible Reasoning, Basingstoke and New York, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 294–330.Google Scholar
Masera, R. (2015) ‘Macro Prudential Policy as a Reference for Economic Policies: A Hicksian Perspective’, in Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Workshop ‘Between Theory and Policy: Political Economy of Crises, Rome, 27 October 2015.Google Scholar
Masera, R. (2018) ‘Political Economy of Liquidity: The European Economic and Monetary Union’, in Cardinale, I. and Scazzieri, R. (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Political Economy, London, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 489–528.Google Scholar
Maskin, E. and Tirole, T. (1999) ‘Unforeseeen Contingencies and Incomplete Contracts’, The Review of Economic Studies, 66 (1, January), pp. 83–114, special issue: ‘Contracts’.Google Scholar
Matteucci, N. (1994) ‘Il filosofo Friedrich A. von Hayek’, Filosofia politica, 8 (1, April), pp. 65–92.Google Scholar
Mazzucato, M. (2018) The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths, London, Penguin.Google Scholar
Mercier de la Rivière, P.-P. (1767) L’ordre naturel et essentiel des sociétés politiques, London [Paris], Jean Nourse; & se trouve à Paris, chez Desaint.Google Scholar
Migeotte, L. (2009 [2002]) The Economy of the Greek Cities: From the Archaic Period to the Early Roman Empire, Berkeley and London, University of California Press.Google Scholar
Milbank, J. and Pabst, A. (2016) The Politics of Virtue: Post-liberalism and the Human Future, London, Rowman & Littlefield International.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1965 [1848]) Principles of Political Economy with Some of Their Applications to Social Philosophy, London, J.W. Parker; Boston, C.C. Little and J. Bourn.Google Scholar
Milner, H. (1999) ‘The Political Economy of International Trade’, American Review of Political Science, 2, pp. 91–114.Google Scholar
Mises, L. (1949) Human Action: A Treatise on Economics. New Haven, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Montchréstien, A. de (1889 [1615]) Traicté de l’Oeconomie Politique, ed. , Téophile Funck-Brentano, , Paris, , Librairie Plon.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, C.-L. de Secondat, baron de la Brède et de (1989 [1748]) De L’Esprit des Loix, Amsterdam, chez Chatelain; Trans. The Spirit of the Laws, tr. and ed. Cohler, A. M., Miller, B. C., and Stone, H. S., Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, A. (2005) ‘The European Constitutional Compromise and the Neofunctionalist Legacy’, Journal of European Public Policy, 12 (2), pp. 349–386.Google Scholar
Morishima, M. (1964) Equilibrium, Stability and Growth: A Multi-Sectoral Analysis, Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Morris, D. J. and Stout, D. K. (1985) ‘Industrial Policy’, in Morris, D. J. (ed.), The Economic System in the UK, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 851–894.Google Scholar
Mortati, C. (1998 [1940]) La Costituzione in senso materiale, reprinted with preface by G. Zagrebelsky, Milano, Giuffrè.Google Scholar
Mutz, D. (2002) ‘The Consequences of Cross-Cutting Networks for Political Participation’, American Journal of Political Science, 46(4), pp. 838–855.Google Scholar
Mutz, D. (2006) Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy, Cambridge, Cambridge University |Press.Google Scholar
Myrdal, G. (1939) Monetary Equilibrium, London, Edinburgh, and Glasgow, William Hodge and Company.Google Scholar
Nakhimovsky, I. (2011) The Closed Commercial State: Perpetual Peace and Commercial Society from Rousseau to Fichte, Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nikaido, H. (2014) ‘Hawkins–Simon conditions’, in Durlauf, S. N. and Blume, L. E., The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd edition, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, accessed 28 August 2018, www.dictionaryofeconomics.com/article?id=pde2008H00002710.1057/9780230226203.0708Google Scholar
Noble, D. F. (1986) Forces of Production: A Social History of Industrial Automation, New York and Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
North, D. C. (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
North, D. C. (2005) Understanding the Process of Economic Change, Princeton and Oxford, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
North, D. C., Wallis, J. J., and Weingast, B. R. (2010) Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O’Mahony, P. O. (2019 [2013]) The Contemporary Theory of the Public Sphere, Bern, Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Olson, M. (1971 [1965]) The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Olson, M. (1982) The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities, New Haven, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ornaghi, L. (1984) ‘Introduzione’, in Ornaghi, L. (ed.), Il concetto di “interesse”, Milano, Giuffrè, pp. 4–81.Google Scholar
Ornaghi, L. (1990) ‘Economic Structure and Political Institutions: A Theoretical Framework’, in Baranzini, M. and Scazzieri, R. (eds.), The Economic Theory of Structure and Change, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 23–44.Google Scholar
Ozdagli, A. and Weber, M. (2017) ‘Monetary Policy through Production Networks: Evidence from the Stock Market’, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working paper n. 23424, doi: 10.3386/w23424Google Scholar
Pabst, A. (2011) ‘The Paradoxical Nature of the Good: Relationality, Sympathy, and Mutuality in Rival Traditions of Civil Economy’, in Pabst, A. (ed.), The Crisis of Global Capitalism: Pope Benedict XVI’s Social Encyclical and the Future of Political Economy, Eugene, OR, Wipf and Stock, pp. 173–206.Google Scholar
Pabst, A. (2014) ‘The Constitutional vs. the Contractualist Tradition: A Foundational Divide in Political Economy’, Paper presented at the Cambridge Research Seminar in Political Economy, Emmanuel College, Cambridge, 6 February 2014.Google Scholar
Pabst, A. (2016) ‘Is Liberal Democracy Sliding into “Democratic Despotism”?’, The Political Quarterly, 87 (1, January–March), pp. 91–95.Google Scholar
Pabst, A. (2017) ‘Political Economy and the Constitution of Europe’s Polity’ in Cardinale, I., Coffman, D., and Scazzieri, R. (eds.), The Political Economy of the Eurozone, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 183–215.Google Scholar
Pabst, A. (2018a), ‘The Political Economy of Civil Society’, in Cardinale, I. and Scazzieri, R. (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Political Economy, London, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 289–331.Google Scholar
Pabst, A. (2018b) ‘Political Economy of Virtue: Civil Economy, Happiness and Public Trust in the Thought of Antonio Genovesi’, European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 25 (4, October), pp. 582–604.Google Scholar
Pabst, A. (2020) ‘The “Body Politic” and Political Economy’, Rendiconti, Classe di Scienze Morali, Storiche e Filologiche, Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, serie ix, vol. xxxi, pp. 231–238.Google Scholar
Pabst, A. and Scazzieri, R. (2012) ‘The Political Economy of Civil Society’, Constitutional Political Economy, 23 (4, December), pp. 337–356.Google Scholar
Pabst, A. and Scazzieri, R. (2016) ‘The Political Economy of Constitution’, Oeconomia: History, Methodology, Philosophy, 6 (3), pp. 337–362.Google Scholar
Pabst, A. and Scazzieri, R. (2019) ‘Virtue, Production, and the Politics of Commerce: Genovesi’s “Civil Economy” Revisited’, History of Political Economy, 51 (4, August), pp. 703–729.Google Scholar
Pack, H. and Saggi, K. (2006) ‘Is There a Case for Industrial Policy? A Critical Survey’, The World Bank Research Observer, 21(2), pp. 267–297.Google Scholar
Palladini, F. (1978) Discussioni seicentesche su Samuel Pufendorf. Scritti latini: 1663–1700, Bologna, Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Pasinetti, L. L. (1973) ‘The Notion of Vertical Integration in Economic Analysis’, Metroeconomica, 25 (1), pp. 1–29.Google Scholar
Pasinetti, L. L. (1977) Lectures on the Theory of Production, New York, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Pasinetti, L. L. (1980 [1973]) ‘The Notion of Vertical Integration in Economic Analysis’, in Pasinetti, L. L. (ed.), Essays on the Theory of Joint Production, London and Basingstoke, Macmillan, pp. 16–43.Google Scholar
Pasinetti, L. L. (1981) Structural Change and Economics Growth: A Theoretical Essay on the Dynamics of the Wealth of Nations, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pasinetti, L. L. (1993) Structural Economic Dynamics: An Essay on the Economic Consequences of Human Learning, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pasinetti, L. L. (2007) Keynes and the Cambridge Keynesians: A ‘Revolution in Economics’ to Be Accomplished. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pasinetti, L. L. (2019) ‘Causality and Interdependence in Econometric Analysis and in Economic Theory’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 49 (June), pp. 357–363.Google Scholar
Pasten, E., Schoenle, R., and Weber, M. (2020) ‘The Propagation of Monetary Policy Shocks in a Heterogeneous Production Economy’, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland Working Paper Series, Paper n. 19_25R https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3488078#Google Scholar
Pearl, J., (2000) Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pelligra, V. (2007) ‘The Not-so-Fragile Fragility of Goodness’, in Bruni, L. and Porta, P. L. (eds.), Handbook on the Economics of Happiness, Cheltenham and Northampton, MA, pp. 290–317.Google Scholar
Perez, C. and Soete, L. (1988) ‘Catching Up in Technology: Entry Barriers and Windows of Opportunity’, in Dosi, G. (ed.), Technical Change and Economic Theory, London, Pinter Publishers, pp. 458–479.Google Scholar
Perna, M. L. (1999) ‘Genovesi, Antonio’, in Dizionario Biografico degli Italiani (Gelati-Ghisalberti), Roma, Istituto della Enciclopedia italiana, vol. 53, pp. 148–153.Google Scholar
Persson, T. and Tabellini, G. (2000) Political Economics: Explaining Economic Policy, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Persson, T. and Tabellini, G. (2005) The Economic Effects of Constitutions, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Petracca, M. P. (1991) ‘The Rational Choice Approach to Politics: A Challenge to Democratic Theory’, The Review of Politics, 53 (2), pp. 289–319. JSTOR, accessed 13 January 2021, www.jstor.org/stable/1407756Google Scholar
Pii, E. (1973) ‘Filosofia ed economia in Antonio Genovesi’, Il pensiero politico, 6 (3), pp. 439–447.Google Scholar
Pizzorno, A. (1986) ‘Some Other Kind of Otherness: A Critique of “Rational Choice” Theories’, in Foxley, A., McPherson, M. S., and O’Donnell, G. (eds.), Development, Democracy, and the Art of Trespassing: Essays in Honour of Albert O. Hirschman, Notre Dame, IN, University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 355–373.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. (1987) The Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law: A Study of English Historical Thought in the Seventeenth Century, 2nd edition, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Polanyi, K. (1957a) ‘Marketless Trading in Hammurabi’s Time’, in Polanyi, K., Arensberg, C. M., and Pearson, H. W. (eds.), Trade and Market in the Early Empires: Economies in History and Theory, Glencoe, IL, The Free Press, pp. 12–26.Google Scholar
Polanyi, K. (1957b) ‘The Economy as an Instituted Process’, in Polanyi, K., Arensberg, C. M., and Pearson, H. W. (eds.), Trade and Market in the Early Empires: Economies in History and Theory, Glencoe, IL, The Free Press, pp. 243–270.Google Scholar
Polanyi, K. (2001 [1944]) The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time, Boston, Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Poni, C. (1997) ‘Standard, fiducia e conversazione civile: misurare lo spessore e la qualità del filo di seta’, Quaderni storici, 32, (3, December), pp. 717–734.Google Scholar
Poni, C. (1998) ‘Mode et innovation. Les strategies des marchands en soie de Lyon au XVIII siècle’, Revue d’histoire moderne et contemporaine, 45 (3, July–September), pp. 589–625.Google Scholar
Poni, C. (2001) ‘Comparing Two Urban Industrial Districts: Bologna and Lyon in the Early Modern Period’, in Porta, P. L., Scazzieri, R., and Skinner, A. (eds.), Knowledge, Social Institutions and the Division of Labour, Cheltenham and Northampton, MA, Edward Elgar, pp. 199–225.Google Scholar
Porta, P. L. and Scazzieri, R. (2003) ‘Accounting for Social Knowledge: The Relevance of Adam Smith’s Framework’, in Rizzello, S., ed., Cognitive Developments in Economics, London, Routledge, pp. 107–132.Google Scholar
Prebisch, R. (1951) ‘Theoretical and Practical Problems of Economic Growth’, Economic Commission for Latin America, Fourth Session, Mexico D. F. (28 May 1950), mimeo.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, S. (1668) De statu imperii germanici ad Laelium fratrem, dominum Trezolani, liber unus, published under the pseudonym of Severinus de Monzambano Veronensis, Veronae, apud Franciscum Giulium.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A. (1967) Rendita e distribuzione in un modello economico plurisettoriale. Milano, Giuffrè.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A. (1986) ‘Technological Scarcity: An Essay on Production and Structural Change’, in Baranzini, M. and Scazzieri, R. (eds.), Foundations of Economics. Structures of Inquiry and Economic Theory, Oxford and New York, Basil Blackwell, pp. 311–338.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A. (1990) Rent, Distribution and Economic Structure: A Collection of Essays, Milan: CNR-IDSE.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A. (1996) ‘Production and Efficiency with Global Technologies’, in Landesmann, M. and Scazzieri, R. (eds.), Production and Economic Dynamics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 105–126.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A. (2017) ‘Eurobonds for EMU Stability and Structural Growth’, in Cardinale, I., Coffman, D., and Scazzieri, R. (eds.), The Political Economy of the Eurozone, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 395–434.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A. and Pellizzari, F. (1999) Rent, Resources, Technologies, Berlin, Springer.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A. and Pellizzari, F. (2018) ‘Political Economy of Resources’, in Cardinale, I. and Scazzieri, R. (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Political Economy, London, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 657–704.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A. and Scazzieri, R. (1986) ‘The Exchange-Production Duality and the Dynamics of Economic Knowledge’ in Baranzini, M. and Scazzieri, R. (eds.), Foundations of Economics: Structures of Inquiry and Economic Theory, Oxford and New York, Basil Blackwell, pp. 377–407.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A. and Silvani, A. (2020) ‘Research and Development in European Union Politics’, in Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, Oxford, Oxford University Press, https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1050Google Scholar
Quesnay, F. (1972 [1759]) Quesnay’s Tableau Économique, ed. Kuczynski, M. and Meek, R. L., London and New York, Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rae, D. W. and Taylor, M. (1970) The Analysis of Political Cleavages, New Haven, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ranky, P. (1983) The Design and Operation of FMS: Flexible Manufacturing Systems, Bedford, IFS Publications Ltd.; Amsterdam, New York, Oxford, North-Holland.Google Scholar
Raphael, D. D. and Macfie, A. L. (1976) ‘Introduction’, in Smith, A., The Theory of Moral Sentiments, eds. Raphael, D. D. and Macfie, A. L., vol. I of The Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith, Oxford, Clarendon Press, pp. 1–52.Google Scholar
Rathmill, K. (ed.) (1986) Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Flexible Manufacturing Systems, Bedford, IFS Publications.Google Scholar
Reggiani, A. (2013) ‘Network Resilience for Transport Security: Some Methodological Considerations’, Transport Policy, 28 (July), pp. 63–68.Google Scholar
Reinert, E. (1995) ‘Competitiveness and Its Predecessors: A 500-Year Cross-National Perspective’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 6 (March), pp. 23–42.Google Scholar
Reinert, E. (1999) ‘The Role of the State in Economic Growth’, Journal of Economic Studies, 26 (4/5), pp. 268–326.Google Scholar
Ricardo, D. (1951 [1817]) On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. Vol. I of The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, ed. Piero Sraffa with the collaboration of Maurice H. Dobb, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Richelet, P. (1785) Dictionnaire de la langue française ancienne et moderne, Basel, Brandmüller.Google Scholar
Riley, P. (1986) The General Will before Rousseau: The Transformation of the Divine into the Civic, Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Robertson, D. H. (1915) A Theory of Industrial Fluctuation, London, P.S. King and Son.Google Scholar
Robertson, J. (2005) The Case for the Enlightenment: Scotland and Naples, 1680–1760, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Romagnosi, G. D. (1827) ‘Quesito. Il modo usato da alcuni scrittori di oggidì nel trattare le Dottrine economiche è forse plausibile?’ Annali Universali di Statistica, 13 (July), pp. 23–30.Google Scholar
Romagnosi, G. D. (1835) ‘Ordinamento della economica dottrina’, in Romagnosi, G. D., Opere, vol. X, Firenze, Piatti, pp. 21–40.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, S. (2011) Common Sense: A Political History, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenstein Rodan, P. N. (1943) ‘Problems of Industrialization of Eastern and South-Eastern Europe’, The Economic Journal, 53 (June–September), pp. 202–211.Google Scholar
Rothschild, E. (2001) Economic Sentiments: Adam Smith, Condorcet and the Enlightenment, Cambridge, MA and London, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rothschild, E. and Sen, A. (2006) ‘Adam Smith’s Economics’, in The Cambridge Companion to Adam Smith, ed. Haakonssen, K., Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 319–365.Google Scholar
Rotstein, A. (1970) ‘Karl Polanyi's Concept of Non-Market Trade’, The Journal of Economic History, 30 (1, March), pp. 117–126.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J. J. (1923 [1755]), The Social Contract and Discourses by Jean-Jacques Rousseau, tr. with an Introduction by G. D. H. Cole, London and Toronto, J.M. Dent and Sons.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J. J. (1997 [1762]) The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings, tr. and ed. Gourevitch, Victor, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rubinelli, L. (2019) ‘Costantino Mortati and the Idea of Material Constitution’, History of Political Thought, 40 (3, Autumn), pp. 515–546.Google Scholar
Rubinelli, L. (2020) Constituent Power: A History, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sainsbury, D. (2020) Windows of Opportunity: How Nations Create Wealth, London, Profile Books.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. (2004) ‘Where Ricardo and Mill Rebut and Confirm Arguments of Mainstream Economists Supporting Globalization’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18 (3, Summer), pp. 135–146.Google Scholar
Sassen, S. (2001) ‘Global Cities and Global City-Regions: A Comparison’, in Scott, Allen J. (ed.), Global City-Regions: Trends, Theory, Policy, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 78–95.Google Scholar
Scazzieri, R. (1990) ‘Vertical Integration in Economic Theory’, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 13 (1), pp. 20–46.Google Scholar
Scazzieri, R. (1993) A Theory of Production: Tasks, Processes, and Technical Practices, Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Scazzieri, R. (1997) ‘A Theory of Resilient Flow-Fund Linkages’, in Mayumi, K. and Gowdy, J. M. (eds.) Bioeconomics and Sustainability. Essays in Honour of Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen, Cheltenham (UK) and Northampton (MA), Edward Elgar, pp. 229–256.Google Scholar
Scazzieri, R. (1998) ‘Hierarchy of Production Activities and Decomposition of Structural Change: An Essay in the Theory of Economic History’, in Kurz, H. D. and Hagemann, H. (eds.), Political Economics in Retrospect: Essays in Memory of Adolph Lowe, Cheltenham and Northampton, MA, Edward Elgar, pp. 195–207.Google Scholar
Scazzieri, R. (1999a) ‘Modelli di società civile’, Filosofia politica, 13 (3, December), pp. 363–378.Google Scholar
Scazzieri, R. (1999b) ‘A Theory of Resilient Flow-Fund Linkages’, in Mayumi, K. and Gowdy, J. M. (eds.), Bioeconomics and Sustainability: Essays in Honor of Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen, Cheltenham and Northampton, MA, pp. 229–256.Google Scholar
Scazzieri, R. (2003a) ‘A Theory of Framing and Coordination: Hayek and the Scottish Tradition’, Rivista Internazionale di Scienze Economiche e Commerciali, 50 (3, September), pp. 323–349.Google Scholar
Scazzieri, R. (2003b) ‘Experiments, Heuristics and Social Diversity: A Comment on Reinhard Selten’, in Galavotti, M. C. (ed.), Observation and Experiment in the Natural and Social Sciences, Dordrecht, Kluwer, pp. 85–98.Google Scholar
Scazzieri, R. (2003c) ‘Teoría económica de la sociedad civil global’, in Beneyto, J. V. (ed.), Hacia una socieded civil global, Madrid, Taurus, pp. 119–138.Google Scholar
Scazzieri, R. (2006) ‘A Smithian Theory of Choice’, in Brown, Vivienne (ed.), The Adam Smith Review, vol. 2, pp. 21–47.Google Scholar
Scazzieri, R. (2008) ‘Context, Congruence and Co-ordination’, in Galavotti, M. C., Scazzieri, R., and Suppes, P. (eds.), Reasoning, Rationality and Probability: CSLI Lecture Notes n.183, Stanford, CSLI Publications, pp. 187–207.Google Scholar
Scazzieri, R. (2012a) ‘Paolo Mattia Doria’, in Porta, P. L. and Zamagni, V. (eds.), Il contributo italiano alla storia del pensiero. Economia, Roma, Istituto della Enciclopedia italiana, pp. 326–331.Google Scholar
Scazzieri, R. (2012b) ‘The Concept of “Natural Economic System”: A Tool for Structural Analysis and an Instrument for Policy Design’, in Arena, R. and Porta, P. L. (eds.), Structural Dynamics and Economic Growth, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 218–240.Google Scholar
Scazzieri, R. (2014a) ‘A Structural Theory of Increasing Returns’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 29 (June), pp. 75–88.Google Scholar
Scazzieri, R. (2014b) ‘L’illuminismo delle riforme civili: divisione del lavoro, commercio, produzione della ricchezza’, in Porta, P. L. and Scazzieri, R. (eds.), L’illuminismo delle riforme covili: il contributo degli economisti lombardi, Milano, Istituto Lombardo di Scienze e Lettere, pp. 13–38.Google Scholar
Scazzieri, R. (2014c) ‘Foreword to Albert Aftalion’s Essay’, Economia Politica, 31 (1, April), pp. 89–92.Google Scholar
Scazzieri, R. (2015) ‘The Medium-Term Approach to Economic Crises: A Framework’, unpublished mimeo, Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Workshop ‘Between Theory and Policy: Political Economy of Crises’, Rome, 27 October 2015.Google Scholar
Scazzieri, R. (2017) ‘Liquidity Architectures and Production Arrangements: A Conceptual Scheme’, in Cardinale, I., Coffman, D., and Scazzieri, R. (eds.), The Political Economy of the Eurozone, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 155–182.Google Scholar
Scazzieri, R. (2018a) ‘Political Economy of Economic Theory’, in Cardinale, I. and Scazzieri, R. (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Political Economy, London, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 193–233.Google Scholar
Scazzieri, R. (2018b) ‘Structural Dynamics and Evolutionary Change’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 46 (September), pp. 52–58.Google Scholar
Scazzieri, R. (2019) ‘Between Theory and History: The Structural Dynamics Tradition’, in Sinha, A. and Thomas, A. M. (eds.), Pluralistic Economics and Its History, Abingdon and New York, Routledge, pp. 136–159.Google Scholar
Scazzieri, R. (2020a) ‘Ripensare l’economia politica. Strutture analitiche e contesti’, Rendiconti, Classe di Scienze Morali, Storiche e Filologiche, Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, serie ix, vol. xxxi, pp. 175–210.Google Scholar
Scazzieri, R. (2020b) ‘Remembering, Forgetting, and the Construction of Identity’, Balzan Papers, 3, pp. 155–160.Google Scholar
Scazzieri, R. (2021) ‘Complex Structures and Relative Invariance in Economic Dynamics’, in Reggiani, A., Schintler, L. A., Czamanski, D., and Patuelli, R. (eds.), Handbook on Entropy, Complexity and Spatial Dynamics: A Rebirth of Theory? Cheltenham and New York, Edward Elgar, pp. 274–289.Google Scholar
Scazzieri, R. (2022) ‘Decomposability and Relative Invariance: The Structural Approach to Network Complexity and Resilience’, Networks and Spatial Economics, vol. 22, special issue ‘Resilience, Vulnerability and Complexity in Socioeconomic Systems’, pp. 635–657.Google Scholar
Scazzieri, R. and Quadrio Curzio, A. (2022) ‘Introduzione. Sulla complessita’ teorica e storica dell’economia politica’, in Curzio, A. Quadrio (ed.), Economia, complessita’, sviluppo. Scritti vari, Atti della Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei. Memorie, pp. 13–37.Google Scholar
Scazzieri, R. and Zamagni, S. (2008) ‘Between Theory and History: On the Identity of Hicks’s Economics’, in Scazzieri, R., Sen, A., and Zamagni, S. (eds.), Markets, Money and Capital: Hicksian Perspectives for the Twenty First Century, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–37.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1977) ‘Social Choice Theory: A Re-Examination’, Econometrica, 45 (1, January), pp. 53–89.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1999a) Reason before Identity, The Romanes Lecture for 1998, delivered before the University of Oxford on 17 November 1998, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1999b) ‘The Possibility of Social Choice’, The American Economic Review, 89 (3, June), pp. 349–378.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (2002) ‘Positional Objectivity’, in Rationality and Freedom, Cambridge, MA and London, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, pp. 463–483.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (2006) ‘What Do We Want from a Theory of Justice?’, The Journal of Philosophy, 103 (5), pp. 215–238.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (2017 [1970]) Collective Choice and Social Welfare, 2nd expanded and updated edition, London, Penguin.Google Scholar
Serra, A. (2011 [1613]) A Short Treatise on the Wealth and Poverty of Nations, tr. by Hunt, Jonathan, ed. and with an introduction by Sophus A. Reinert. London and New York, Anthem Press (Original title: Breve trattato delle cause che possono far abbondare li regni d’oro e argento dove non sono miniere, con applicatione al Regno di Napoli, Naples, Scorriggio).Google Scholar
Seton, F. (1992) The Economics of Cost, Use, and Value: The Evaluation of Performance, Structure, and Prices across Time, Space, and Economic Systems, with a foreword by Jan Tinbergen and a special annex and appendix contributed by A. E. Steenge. revised and expanded edition, Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Seton, F. (2000) ‘Scissor Crises, Value-Prices, and the Movement of Value-Prices under Technical Change’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 11 (July), pp. 13–24.Google Scholar
Shaftesbury, A. A. [Anthony Ashley Cooper, Earl of] (1790 [1699]), ‘An Inquiry Concerning Virtue and Merit’, in Characteristics of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times, Basil, J.J. Tourneisen and J.L. Legrand, pp. 1–145.Google Scholar
Shepsle, K. A. (1989) ‘Studying Institutions: Some Lessons from the Rational Choice Approach’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 1 (2, April), pp. 131–147.Google Scholar
Simmel, G. (1955 [1922]) ‘The Web of Group-Affiliations’, in Conflict; The Web of Group Affiliations, Glencoe, IL, The Free Press.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1962) ‘The Architecture of Complexity’, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106 (6, December), pp. 467–482.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (2002) ‘Near Decomposability and the Speed of Evolution’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 11 (3), pp. 587–599.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. and Ando, A. (1961) ‘Aggregation of Variables in Dynamic Systems’, Econometrica, 29 (2, April), pp. 111–138.Google Scholar
Sinha, A. (2019) Essays on the Theory of Value in the Classical Tradition, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. (1983) ‘Machiavelli and the Maintenance of Liberty’, Politics, 18 (2), pp. 3–15.Google Scholar
Skocpol, T., Evans, P., and Rueschemeyer, D. (1985) Bringing the State Back In, New York and Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1976 [1759]) The Theory of Moral Sentiments, Raphael, D. D. and Macfie, A. L. (eds.), Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1976 [1776]) An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, general eds. Campbell, R. H. and Skinner, A. S., textual ed. Todd, W. B., Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Smith, A. 1978 [1762–1762, 1766]) Lectures on Jurisprudence, ed. Meek, R. L., Raphael, D. D., and Stein, P. G., Oxford, Clarendon Press (report dated 1766).Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1980 [ms. circa 1777]) ‘Of the Nature of That Imitation Which Takes Place in What Are Called the Imitative Arts’, in Wightman, W. P. D. and Bryce, J. C. (eds.), Essays on Philosophical Subjects, Oxford, Clarendon Press, pp. 176–213.Google Scholar
Smith, V. (2008) Rationality in Economics. Constructivist and Ecological Forms, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Soudek, J. (1952) ‘Aristotle’s Theory of Exchange: An Inquiry into the Origin of Economic Analysis’, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 96 (1, February), pp. 45–75.Google Scholar
Sraffa, P. (1960) Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities: Prelude to a Critique of Economic Theory, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sraffa, P. (1998 [1925]) ‘On the Relations between Cost and Quantity Produced’, in Pasinetti, L. (ed.), Italian Economic Papers, Oxford, Oxford University Press and Bologna, Il Mulino, vol. III, pp. 323–363.Google Scholar
Stahl, H. H. (1939) ‘Organizarea socială a t̗ărăânimii’ [Social Organization of Peasantry], Enciclopedia României, vol. I, pp. 559–576.Google Scholar
Steenge, A. E. (2011) ‘On the Evolution of Multi-Sectoral Models; Optimality and Beyond’, in Ciaschini, M. and Romagnoli, G. C. (eds.), L’economia Italiana: metodi di analisi, misurazione e nodi strutturali; Saggi per Guido M. Rey, Milano, Franco Angeli, pp. 92–114.Google Scholar
Stein, P. (1999) Roman Law in European History, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stigler, G. (1951) ‘The Division of Labour Is Limited by the Extent of the Market’, Journal of Political Economy, 59 (3), pp. 185–193.Google Scholar
Stone, R. (1962), ‘Multiple Classifications in Social Accounting’, paper presented at a meeting of Institut International de Statistique, Paris, 1961, Bulletin de l’Institut International de Statistique, 39, pp. 215–233.Google Scholar
Strathern, M. (1988) The Gender of the Gift: Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia, Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London, University of California Press.Google Scholar
Strathern, M. (2018) ‘Acceptance Speech’, Balzan Prizes 2018, Milano, Fondazione Internazionale Premio E. Balzan ‘Premio’.Google Scholar
Strathern, M. (2020) Relations: An Anthropological Account, Durham, NC, Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Streeck, W. (2019) ‘Reflections on Political Scale’, Adam Smith Lecture in Jurisprudence, University of Glasgow, 30 May 2018, Jurisprudence: An International Journal of Legal and Political Thought, 10 (1, April), pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Sugden, R. (2005a) ‘Correspondence of Sentiments: An Explanation of the Pleasure of Social Interaction’, in Bruni, L. and Porta, P. L. (eds.), Economics and Happiness: Framing the Analysis, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 91–115.Google Scholar
Sugden, R. (2005b) ‘Fellow-Feeling’, in Gui, B. and Sugden, R. (eds.), Economics and Social Interaction: Accounting for Interpersonal Relations, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 52–75.Google Scholar
Szirmai, A. (2012) ‘Industrialisation as an Engine of Growth in Developing Countries, 1950–2005’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 23 (December), pp. 406–420.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, A. de (1856) L’Ancien Régime et la Révolution, Paris, Michel-Lévy frères.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, A. de (1969 [1835–1840]) Democracy in America, tr. G. Lawrence, New York, Doubleday.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, A. de (2005 [1847–1848]) ‘Question financière’, in Tocqueville, A. de, Textes économiques, Anthologie critique par J.-L-. Benoît et É. Keslassy, Paris, Pocket, pp. 184–189.Google Scholar
Torrini, M. (1983) ‘Le passioni di Paolo Mattia Doria: Il problema delle passioni dell’animo nella “Vita Civile”’, Giornale critico della filosofia italiana, 62 (1, January–April), p. 129–152.Google Scholar
Trakman, L. E. (2003) ‘From the Medieval Law Merchant to E-Merchant Law’, The University of Toronto Law Journal, 53 (3), pp. 265–304.Google Scholar
Tribe, K. (2017) Governing Economy: The Reformation of German Economic Discourse, 1750–1840, 2nd rev. edition, Newbury, Threshold Press.Google Scholar
Tuck, R. (1993) Philosophy and Government, 1572–1651, Cambridge, Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Tuck, R. (2016) The Sleeping Sovereign: The Invention of Modern Democracy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tugan Baranovsky, M. I. (1894) Promyshlennye krizisy v sovremennoi Anglii [Industrial Crises in Great Britain], St. Peterburg, Tip. I. N. Skorochodova.Google Scholar
von Tunzelmann, G. N. (1995) Technology and Industrial Progress: The Foundations of Economic Growth, Aldershot and Brookfield, VT, Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Tuomela, R. (2007) The Philosophy of Sociality: The Shared Point of View, Oxford and New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Turchin, P. (2016) Ages of Discord: A Structural-Demographic Analysis of American History, Chaplin, CT, Beresta BooksGoogle Scholar
Vanberg, V. J. (2005) ‘Market and State: The Perspective of Constitutional Political Economy’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 1 (1, June), pp. 23–49.Google Scholar
van Schendelen, M. P. C. M. (ed.) (1984) ‘Consociationalism, Pillarization and Conflict‐Management in the Low Countries’, Special issue of Acta Politica, 19 (1), pp. 7–178.Google Scholar
Venkatachalam, R. and Kumar, S. M. (2021) ‘Economic Structures and Dynamics: A Morphogenetic View’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2021.02.003Google Scholar
von Hermann, F. B. W. (1832) Staatswirthschaftliche Untersuchungen, München, A. Weber.Google Scholar
von Sonnenfels, J. (1765) Grundsätze der Polizey, Handlung und Finanzwissenschaft, Wien, Kurzboeck.Google Scholar
von Strigl, R. (2012 [1934]) Capital and Production, tr. from the German by M. R. Hoppe and H. H. Hoppe; ed. with an introduction by Hulsmann, J. G., Auburn, Mises Institute.Google Scholar
Wakefield, E. G. (1835–1843) ‘Commentary’, in Adam Smith, L. L. D, An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, with a commentary by the author of ‘England and America’, London, Charles Knight.Google Scholar
Wamba, S. F., Akter, S., Edwards, A., Chopin, G., and Gnanzou, D. (2015) ‘How “Big Data” Can Make Big Impact: Findings from a Systematic Review and a Longitudinal Case Study’, International Journal of Production Economics, 165 (July), pp. 234–246.Google Scholar
Wang, H. (2014) China from Empire to Nation-State, Cambridge, MA and London, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Weaver, W. (1948) ‘Science and Complexity’, American Scientist, 36 (4, October), pp. 536–544.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1947 [1922]) Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, Tübingen, Mohr (Paul Siebeck); trans. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization, New York, The Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
Weingast, B. R., and Wittmann, D. A. (eds.) (2006) The Oxford Handbook of Political Economy, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, J. (2000) ‘What Should the World Bank Think about the Washington Consensus?’ World Bank Research Observer, 15 (2, August), pp. 251–264.Google Scholar
Willinger, M. (1989) ‘Industrial Development of Composite Materials: Towards a Functional Appraisal’, Composites Science and Technology, 34 (1), pp. 53–71.Google Scholar
Yongjin, Z. and Buzan, B. (2012) ‘The Tributary System as International Society in Theory and Practice’, The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 5 (1, Spring), pp. 3–36.Google Scholar
Young, A. (1928) ‘Increasing Returns and Economic Progress’, The Economic Journal, 38 (December), pp. 527–542.Google Scholar
Zadeh, L. (2011) ‘Generalized Theory of Uncertainty: Principal Concepts and Ideas’, in Brandolini, S. Marzetti Dall’Aste and Scazzieri, R. (eds.), Fundamental Uncertainty. Rationality and Plausible Reasoning, Basingstoke, Hampshire, and New York, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 104–150.Google Scholar
Zamagni, S. (2004) ‘Towards an Economy of Human Relations: on the Role of Psychology in Economics’, Group Analysis, 37 (1, March), pp. 17–32.Google Scholar
Zamagni, S. (2015) ‘Development, Capabilities and Institutions’, in Baranzini, M., Rotondi, C., and Scazzieri, R. (eds.), Resources, Production and Structural Dynamics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 259–278.Google Scholar