Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:57:57.192Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Democratization and political participation: the experience of the Czech Republic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2011

David M. Olson
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina in Greensboro
Karen Dawisha
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, College Park
Bruce Parrott
Affiliation:
The Johns Hopkins University
Get access

Summary

The Czech Republic is an example of a postcommunist country well on its way toward a consolidated democratic political system. Building upon its democratic past in the interwar period, its postcommunist political and economic system closely follows a western democratic model. Not only does the Republic wish to “join Europe” in foreign policy and economic relations, it also seeks to become fully democratic in its internal life.

The sudden and unexpected dissolution of the Czech and Slovak Federation in 1993 did not disrupt the development of democracy, economic reform, or the new party system within the Czech Republic. Though the Czech Republic as an independent sovereign nation dates only from 1993, political developments within that Republic are a continuation of the “velvet revolution” and democratization process initiated within the Czechoslovakian Federation in 1989–90.

The Czech Republic would appear as one of the more stabilized and successful of the postcommunist states in both politics and economics. The major democratization developments within the Czech Republic include the rapid growth of a multiparty system, the slower growth of an interest group system, and the abrupt increase in parliamentary activity. In economics, rapid privatization in all retail and profitable industry sectors has been accompanied by continued state ownership of either unprofitable or critical sectors. The public, as measured through opinion polling, seems to have an accepting, if reserved, attitude toward these postcommunist changes.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×