Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T22:29:39.154Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

18 - Synthesis – what is the future of freshwater fishes?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2015

Gerard P. Closs
Affiliation:
University of Otago
Martin Krkosek
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Julian D. Olden
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Gerard P. Closs
Affiliation:
University of Otago, New Zealand
Martin Krkosek
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Julian D. Olden
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Get access

Summary

Global ecosystems are increasingly shaped and dominated by the human enterprise, and overwhelming evidence indicates that the abundance and diversity of freshwater fishes are declining at unprecedented rates (Olden et al. 2010; Chapters 1 and 2). More often than not, this phenomenon is directly or indirectly attributed to various human activities (Angermeier, 2007; Dudgeon, 2010, 2011; Vörösmarty et al., 2010; Chapter 1). Current trends suggest that many, if not all, regions of high freshwater fish diversity will face greater threats in the near future (Dudgeon, 2011; Chapter 1). In a global environment where human demands placed upon freshwater ecosystems are increasing (Angermeier, 2007; Chapter 2), compelling arguments must be advanced to ensure the future of freshwater fishes.

WHY SHOULD WE CONSERVE FRESHWATER FISH DIVERSITY?

Fishes play a central role in the structure and function of freshwater ecosystems. Many fishes represent critical keystone species within their communities, and their loss can result in considerable and unpredictable changes to both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Loss of species signifies the erosion of natural capital and loss of ecological function, which ultimately reduces the stability, value and support that such systems provide for sustainable human economies (Angermeier, 2007; Chapter 2). The decline and loss of freshwater fish diversity should be a clear warning of the extent to which we are shifting ecosystems away from their natural state, and into ecological domains that are potentially very different to those in which humans have evolved (Chapters 3 and 5). Put another way, we are increasingly moving into unfamiliar ecological territory.

Freshwater fish also contribute significantly to the quality of human life in a diverse range of ways. Across many regions of the world, freshwater fish remain critical for income, nutrition and cultural heritage (Chapter 15). Water-based recreational activities, including fishing and nature watching, continue to be important individual and social activities for many millions of people around the planet. Natural ecosystems also play a central role in global tourism, and contribute greatly to the ‘sense of place’ of different locations – as natural systems homogenize, much of the uniqueness of different locations around the planet degrades as well. Losing access to such activities and values due to ecosystem degradation represents a significant loss in the quality of human life (Angermeier, 2007). From a scientific perspective, freshwater fish contribute significantly to our understanding of the evolution and maintenance of biological diversity (Chapters 16 and 17).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abell, R., Thieme, M. L., Revenga, C., et al. (2008). Freshwater ecoregions of the world: a new map of biogeographic units for freshwater biodiversity conservation. Bioscience, 58, 403–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angermeier, P. L. (2007). The role of fish biologists in helping society build ecological sustainability. Fisheries, 32, 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudgeon, D. (2010). Requiem for a river: extinctions, climate change and the last of the Yangtze. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 20, 127–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudgeon, D. (2011). Asian river fishes in the Anthropocene: threats and conservation challenges in an era of rapid environmental change. Journal of Fish Biology, 79, 1487–1524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphries, P. & Winemiller, K. O. (2009). Historical impacts on river fauna, shifting baselines, and challenges for restoration. Bioscience, 59, 673–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koehn, J. D. & Lintermans, M. (2012). A strategy to rehabilitate fishes of the Murray–Darling basin, south-eastern Australia. Endangered Species Research, 16, 165–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monroe, J. B., Baxter, C. V., Olden, J. D. & Angermeier, P. L. (2009). Freshwaters in the public eye: understanding the role of images and media in aquatic conservation. Fisheries, 34, 581–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olden, J. D., Hogan, Z. S. & Vander Zanden, M. J. (2007). Small fish, big fish, red fish, blue fish: size-biased extinction risk of the world's freshwater and marine fishes. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 16, 694–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olden, J. D., Kennard, M. K., Leprieur, F., et al. (2010). Conservation biogeography of freshwater fishes: past progress and future directions. Diversity and Distributions, 16, 496–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelayo-Villamil, P., Guisande, C., Vari, R. P., et al. (2015). Global diversity patterns of freshwater fishes – potential victims of their own success. Diversity and Distributions, 21, 345–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roni, P., Hanson, K. & Beechie, T. J. (2008). Global review of the physical and biological effectiveness of stream habitat rehabilitation techniques. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 28, 856–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turvey, S. T., Barrett, L. A., Hao, Y., et al. (2010). Rapidly shifting baselines in Yangtze fishing communities and local memory of extinct species. Conservation Biology, 24, 778–787.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vörösmarty, C. J., McIntyre, P. B., Gessner, M. O., et al. (2010). Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature, 467, 555–561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ziv, G., Baran, E., Nam, S., Rodriguez-Iturbe, I. & Levin, S. A. (2012). Trading-off fish biodiversity, food security, and hydropower in the Mekong river basin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 5609–5614.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×