Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T21:09:21.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - From individual behavior to population viability: implications for conservation and management

from Part III - Behavior-based management: using behavioral knowledge to improve conservation and management efforts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2016

Carmen Bessa Gomes
Affiliation:
Université Paris-Sud, France
François Sarrazin
Affiliation:
UPMC, CESCO UMR 7204 MNHN CNRS UPMC, France
Oded Berger-Tal
Affiliation:
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel
David Saltz
Affiliation:
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

In this chapter we explore how behavior can be taken into account in quantitative population management. Indeed, incorporating behavior in management should take place at all levels of the management process, including in quantitative population management. Quantitative tools are often used to compare management scenarios and can play an integrative role in adaptive management strategies. Whether we envision behavior as a process amenable to management or a constraint impairing population processes, its integration into quantitative tools is likely to make these tools more efficient and more resilient to uncertainty.

The interplay between behavior and population management and, in particular, conservation, is well-rooted in the late 1990s conservation science literature, a period where many behavioral ecologists came forward to discuss the potential contributions of behavioral ecology for conservation (Caro 1998, Sutherland 1998, Gosling & Sutherland 2000). They argued that behavioral ecology could contribute to conservation science not only as a tool for the management of particular species, as ex-situ conservation programs had often done, but by offering conceptual tools that could contribute to better understanding the extinction process. Behavioral ecology could, in particular, help us understand species’ capability to adapt to anthropogenic disturbance (Sutherland & Norris 2002, Sutherland 2006) and predict their vulnerability (Anthony & Blumstein 2000, Sutherland & Norris 2002).

Behavior is a fundamental element in the dynamics of animal populations, as many processes affecting these dynamics are rooted in individual behavior (Sutherland 1996). Animal behavior can be defined as being the range of actions made by organisms in response to various stimuli or inputs, whether internal or external, conscious or subconscious, overt or covert, and voluntary or involuntary. Behavior therefore serves as a fundamental link between the single organism and population processes. Population management typically focuses on factors that determine presence, survival and reproductive rates, which are largely mediated by behavior. Hence, behavior may be integrated in management by identifying the key behavioral responses underlying the population processes that managers seek to address.

Many behavioral responses are indeed already part of the manager's toolbox. If we focus on the three population processes mentioned above (presence, survival and reproduction), we easily find a myriad of examples almost as diverse as the study cases and the management goals (conservation, exploitation, eradication).

Type
Chapter
Information
Conservation Behavior
Applying Behavioral Ecology to Wildlife Conservation and Management
, pp. 247 - 274
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allee, W.C., Park, O., Emerson, A.E., Park, T. and Schmidt, K.P. 1949. Principles of Animal Ecology. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co.
Anthony, L.L. and Blumstein, D.T. 2000. Integrating behaviour into wildlife conservation: the multiple ways that behaviour can reduce Ne. Biological Conservation, 95:303–315.Google Scholar
Armbruster, P. and Lande, R. 1993. A population viability analysis for African elephant (Loxodonta africana): how big should reserves be?Conservation Biology, 7:602–610.Google Scholar
Balkiz, Ö., Bechet, A., Rouan, L., Choquet, R., Germain, C., Amat, J.A., et al. 2010. Experience-dependent natal philopatry of breeding greater flamingos. Journal of Animal Ecology, 79:1045–1056.Google Scholar
Bateman, A.W., Coulson, T. and Clutton-Brock, T.H. 2011. What do simple models reveal about the population dynamics of a cooperatively breeding species?Oikos, 120:787–794.Google Scholar
Bateman, A.W., Ozgul, A., Coulson, T. and Clutton-Brock, T.H. 2012. Density dependence in group dynamics of a highly social mongoose, Suricata suricatta. Journal of Animal Ecology, 81:628–639.Google Scholar
Beissinger, S. and McCullough, D.R. 2002. Population Viability Analysis. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Berger-tal, O. and Saltz, D. 2014. Using the movement patterns of reintroduced animals to improve reintroduction success. Current Zoology, 60:515–526.Google Scholar
Bessa-Gomes, C., Danek-Gontard, M., Cassey, P., Møller, A.P., Legendre, S. and Clobert, J. 2003. Mating behaviour influences extinction risk: insights from demographic modelling and comparative analysis of avian extinction risk. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 40:231–245.Google Scholar
Bessa-Gomes, C., Legendre, S. and Clobert, J. 2004. Allee effects, mating systems and the extinction risk in populations with two sexes. Ecology Letters, 7:802–812.Google Scholar
Bessa-Gomes, C., Legendre, S. and Clobert, J. 2010. Discrete two-sex models of population dynamics: on modelling the mating function. Acta Oecologica, 36:439–445.Google Scholar
Boukal, D. and Berec, L. 2002. Single-species models of the Allee effect: extinction boundaries, sex ratios and mate encounters. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 2018:375–394.Google Scholar
Boyer, D., Ramos-Fernández, G., Miramontes, O., Mateos, J.L., Cocho, G., Larralde, H., et al. 2006. Scale-free foraging by primates emerges from their interaction with a complex environment. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 273:1743–50.Google Scholar
Brashares, J.S. 2003. Ecological, behavioral, and life-history correlates of mammal extinctions in West Africa. Conservation Biology, 17:733–743.Google Scholar
Butynski, T. 1990. Comparative ecology of blue monkeys (Cercopithecus mitis) in high- and low-density subpopulations. Ecological Monographs., 60:1–26.Google Scholar
Caro, T. 1998. Behavioral Ecology and Conservation Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Caswell, H. 2001. Matrix Population Models. Construction, Analyses and Interpretation. Edition. Sunderland: Sinauer.
Chantepie, S., Teplitsky, C., Pavard, S., Sarrazin, F., Descaves, B., Lecuyer, P., et al. 2015. Age-related variation and temporal patterns in the survival of a long-lived scavenger. Oikos, in Press.Google Scholar
Chevin, L.M., Lande, R. and Mace, G.M. 2010. Adaptation, plasticity, and extinction in a changing environment: towards a predictive theory. PLoS Biology, 8.
Choquet, R., Sanz-Aguilar, A., Doligez, B., Nogué, E., Pradel, R., Gustafsson, L., et al. 2013. Estimating demographic parameters from capture-recapture data with dependence among individuals within clusters. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 4:474–482.Google Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T.H. 1989. Mammalian mating systems. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 236: 339–372.Google Scholar
Courchamp, F., Clutton-brock, T. and Grenfell, B. 1999. Inverse density dependence and the Allee effect. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 14:405–410.Google Scholar
Courchamp, F., Clutton-Brock, T. and Grenfell, B. 2000. Multipack dynamics and the Allee effect in the African wild dog, Lycaon pictus. Animal Conservation, 3:277–285.Google Scholar
Dall, S.R.X., Giraldeau, L.-A., Olsson, O., McNamara, J.M. and Stephens, D.W. 2005. Information and its use by animals in evolutionary ecology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20:187–93.Google Scholar
Deygout, C., Gault, A., Duriez, O., Sarrazin, F. and Bessa-Gomes, C. 2010. Impact of food predictability on social facilitation by foraging scavengers. Behavioral Ecology, 21:1131–1139.Google Scholar
Deygout, C., Gault, A., Sarrazin, F. and Bessa-Gomes, C. 2009. Modeling the impact of feeding stations on vulture scavenging service efficiency. Ecological Modelling, 220:1826–1835.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, N.J., Kazem, A.J.N., Réale, D. and Wright, J. 2010. Behavioural reaction norms: animal personality meets individual plasticity. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 25, 81–89Google Scholar
Ditdurell, S., Stillman, R., Triplet, P., Aulert, C., Ditbiot, D., Bouchet, A, et al. 2005. Modelling the efficacy of proposed mitigation areas for shorebirds: a case study on the Seine estuary, France. Biological Conservation 123:67–77.Google Scholar
Dobson, A. and Poole, J. 1998. Conspecifics aggregation and conservation biology. In Caro, T. (ed.) Behavioral Ecology and Conservation Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Doherty, P.F., Sorci, G., Royle, J.A., Hines, J.E., Nichols, J.D. and Boulinier, T. 2003. Sexual selection affects local extinction and turnover in bird communities. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 100:5858–62.Google Scholar
Doligez, B., Danchin, E. and Clobert, J. 2002. Public information and breeding habitat selection in a wild bird population. Science, 297:1168–1170.Google Scholar
Duriez, O., Saether, S. a., Ens, B.J., Choquet, R., Pradel, R., Lambeck, R.H.D., et al. 2009. Estimating survival and movements using both live and dead recoveries: a case study of oystercatchers confronted with habitat change. Journal of Applied Ecology, 46:144–153.Google Scholar
van Dyck, H. and Baguette, M. 2005. Dispersal behaviour in fragmented landscapes: routine or special movements?Basic and Applied Ecology, 6:535–545.Google Scholar
Ferreras, P., Gaona, P., Palomares, F. and Delibes, M. 2001. Restore habitat or reduce mortality? Implications from a population viability analysis of the Iberian lynx. Animal Conservation 4:265–274.Google Scholar
Ferriere, R., Sarrazin, F., Legendre, S. and Baron, J.-P. 1996. Matrix population models applied to viability analysis and conservation: theory and practice using the ULM software. Acta Oecologica, 17:629–656.Google Scholar
Gaillard, J.-M., Yoccoz, N.G., Lebreton, J.-D., Bonenfant, C., Devillard, S., Loison, A., et al. 2005. Generation time: a reliable metric to measure life-history variation among mammalian populations. American Naturalist, 166:119–23.Google Scholar
Gaillard, J.M., Festa-Bianchet, M. and Yoccoz, N.G. 1998. Population dynamics of large herbivores: variable recruitment with constant adult survival. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 13:58–63.Google Scholar
Gosling, L. and Sutherland, W.J. 2000. Behaviour and Conservation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grimm, V., Dorndorf, N. and Frey-Roos, F. 2003. Modelling the role of social behavior in the persistence of the alpine marmot Marmota marmota. Oikos, 102:124–136.Google Scholar
Henle, K., Sarre, S. and Wiegand, K. 2004. The role of density regulation in extinction processes and population viability analysis. Biodiversity and Conservation, 13:9–52.Google Scholar
Hernández-Matías, A., Real, J., Pradel, R., Ravayrol, A., Vincent-Martin, N., Bosca, F., et al. 2010. Determinants of territorial recruitment in Bonelli's eagle (Aquila fasciata) populations. Auk, 127:173–184.Google Scholar
Houston, A.I. and McNamara, J.M. 1999. Models of Adaptive Behaviour: An Approach Based on State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
IUCN/SSC. (2013). Guidelines for Reintroductions and Other Conservation Translocations. UICN Species Survival Commission, Gland, Switzerland.
Jager, H.I., Carr, E.A. and Efroymson, R.A. 2006. Simulated effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on a solitary mustelid predator. Ecological Modelling, 191:416–430.Google Scholar
Kokko, H. and Brooks, R. 2003. Sexy to die for? Sexual selection and the risk of extinction. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 40:207–219.Google Scholar
Laland, K.N., Odling-Smee, J. and Feldman, M.W. 2000. Niche construction, biological evolution, and cultural change. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23:131–146.Google Scholar
Lavorel, S. and Garnier, E. 2002. Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail. Functional Ecology, 16:545–556.Google Scholar
Lebreton, J.D. and Clobert, J. 1991. Bird population dynamics, management and conservation: the role of mathematical modelling. In Perrins, C.M. and Leberton, J.D. (eds.) Bird Population Studies: Relevance to Conservation and ManagementOxford: Oxford University Press.
Legendre, S., Clobert, J., Møller, A. and Sorci, G. 1999. Demographic stochasticity and social mating system in the process of extinction of small populations: the case of passerines introduced to New Zealand. American Naturalist, 153:449–463.Google Scholar
Luque, G.M., Giraud, T. and Courchamp, F. 2013. Allee effects in ants. Journal of Animal Ecology, 82:956–965.Google Scholar
McCullough, D.R. 1981. Population dynamics of the Yellowstone grizzly bear. In Fowler, C.W. and Smith, T.D. (eds.) Dynamics of Large Mammal Populations. New York: John Wiley and Sons, New York.
Mihoub, J.-B., Le Gouar, P. and Sarrazin, F. 2009. Breeding habitat selection behaviors in heterogeneous environments: implications for modeling reintroduction. Oikos, 118:663–674.Google Scholar
Milner-Gulland, E.J., Bukreeva, O.M., Coulson, T., Lushchekina, A.A., Kholodova, M. V. and Grachev, I.A. 2003. Reproductive collapse in saiga antelope harems. Nature, 422:2003.Google Scholar
Møller, A. and Legendre, S. 2001. Allee effect, sexual selection and demographic stochasticity. Oikos, 92:27–34.Google Scholar
Monsarrat, S., Benhamou, S., Sarrazin, F., Bessa-Gomes, C., Bouten, W. and Duriez, O. 2013. How predictability of feeding patches affects home range and foraging habitat selection in avian social scavengers?PLoS ONE, 8:e53077.Google Scholar
Mooring, M.S., Fitzpatrick, T.A., Nishihira, T.T. and Reisig, D.D., 2011. Vigilance, predation risk, and the Allee effect in desert bighorn sheep. Journal of Wildlife Management, 68:519–532.Google Scholar
Morris, W.F. and Doak, D.F. 2002. Quantitative Conservation Biology. Theory and Practice of Population Viability Analyses. Sunderland: Sinauer.
Morrow, E.H. and Fricke, C. 2004. Sexual selection and the risk of extinction in mammals. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 271:2395–2401.Google Scholar
Morrow, E.H. and Pitcher, T.E. 2003. Sexual selection and the risk of extinction in birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 270:1793–1799.Google Scholar
Péron, G., Lebreton, J.-D. and Crochet, P.-A. 2010. Breeding dispersal in black-headed gull: the value of familiarity in a contrasted environment. Journal of Animal Ecology, 79:317–326.Google Scholar
Pradel, R. 2005. Multievent: an extension of multistate capture-recapture models to uncertain states. Biometrics, 61:442–447.Google Scholar
Railsback, S.F. and Harvey, B.C. 2011. Importance of fish behaviour in modelling conservation problems: food limitation as an example. Journal of Fish Biology, 79:1648–1662.Google Scholar
Rands, S.A, Cowlishaw, G., Pettifor, R.A, Rowcliffe, J.M. and Johnstone, R.A. 2003. Spontaneous emergence of leaders and followers in foraging pairs. Nature, 423:432–434.Google Scholar
Rands, S.A, Cowlishaw, G., Pettifor, R.A, Rowcliffe, J.M. and Johnstone, R.A. 2008. The emergence of leaders and followers in foraging pairs when the qualities of individuals differ. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 8:51.Google Scholar
Rivalan, P., Prevot-Julliard, A., Choquet, R., Pradel, R., Jacquemin, B. and Girondot, M. 2005. Trade-off between current reproductive effort and delay to next reproduction in the leatherback sea turtle. Oecologia, 145:564–574.Google Scholar
Rowcliffe, J.M., Pettifor, R. a. and Carbone, C. 2004. Foraging inequalities in large groups: quantifying depletion experienced by individuals in goose flocks. Journal of Animal Ecology, 73:97–108.Google Scholar
Sasaki, K., Fox, S.F. and Duvall, D. 2009. Rapid evolution in the wild: changes in body size, life-history traits, and behavior in hunted populations of the Japanese mamushi snake. Conservation Biology, 23:93–102.Google Scholar
Schaub, M. and von Hirschheydt, J. 2009. Effect of current reproduction on apparent survival, breeding dispersal, and future reproduction in barn swallows assessed by multistate capture-recapture models. Journal of Animal Ecology, 78:625–635.Google Scholar
Seddon, P.J., Griffiths, C.J., Soorae, P.S. and Armstrong, D.P. 2014. Reversing defaunation: restoring species in a changing world. Science, 345:406–412.Google Scholar
Serrano, D., Forero, M., Donázar, J. and Tella, J. 2004. Dispersal and social attraction affect colony selection and dynamics of lesser kestrels. Ecology, 85:3438–3447.Google Scholar
Shochat, E., Patten, M. and Morris, D. 2005. Ecological traps in isodars: effects of tallgrass prairie management on bird nest success. Oikos, 111:159–169.Google Scholar
Stearns, S.C. 1992. The Evolution of Life Histories. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stephens, P., Sutherland, W. and Freckleton, R. 1999. What is the Allee effect?Oikos, 87:185–190.Google Scholar
Stephens, P.A. and Sutherland, W.J. 1999. Consequences of the Allee effect for behaviour, ecology and conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 14:401–405.Google Scholar
Stillman, R.A., Goss-Custard, J.D., West, A.D., Durell, S.E.A.L.V.D., Caldow, R.W.G., Mcgrorty, S., et al. 2000a. Predicting mortality in novel environments: tests and sensitivity of a behaviour-based model. Journal of Applied Ecology, 37:564–588.Google Scholar
Stillman, R.A., West, A.D., Goss-Custard, J.D., Caldow, R.W.G., Mcgrorty, S., Durell, S.E.A.L.V.D., et al. 2003. An individual behaviour-based model can predict shorebird mortality using routinely collected shellfishery data. Journal of Applied Ecology, 40:1090–1101.Google Scholar
Stillman, R.A., Caldow, R.W.G. and Alexander, M.J. 2000b. Individual variation in intake rate: the relative importance of foraging efficiency and dominance. Journal of Animal Ecology, 69:484–493.Google Scholar
Stillman, R.A., Poole, A.E., Goss-Custard, J.D., Caldow, R.W.G., Yates, M.G., Triplet, P., et al. 2002. Predicting the strength of interference more quickly using behaviour-based models. Journal of Animal Ecology, 71:532–541.Google Scholar
Stringham, S.F. 1983. Roles of adult males in grizzly bear population biology. Bears Their Biology and Management, 5:140–151.Google Scholar
Sutherland, W.J. 1996. From Individual Behaviour to Population Ecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sutherland, W.J. 1998. The importance of behavioural studies in conservation biology. Animal Behaviour, 56:801–809.Google Scholar
Sutherland, W.J. 2006. Predicting the ecological consequences of environmental change: a review of the methods. Journal of Applied Ecology, 43:599–616.Google Scholar
Sutherland, W.J. and Norris, K. 2002. Behavioural models of population growth rates: implications for conservation and prediction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 357:1273–84.Google Scholar
Swenson, J.E. 2003. Implications of sexually selected infanticide for the hunting of large carnivores. In Festa-Bianchet, M. and Apollonio, M. (eds.) Animal Behavior and Wildlife Conservation. Washington DC: Island Press.
Tavecchia, G., Pradel, R., Genovart, M. and Oro, D. 2007. Density-dependent parameters and demographic equilibrium in open populations. Oikos, 116:1481–1492.Google Scholar
West, A.D., Goss-Custard, J.D., Mcgrorty, S., Stillman, R.A., Sarah, E.A., Durell, V., et al. 2003. The Burry shellfishery and oystercatchers: using a behaviour-based model to advise on shellfishery management policy. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 248:279–292.Google Scholar
West, A.D., Goss-Custard, J.D., Stillman, R.A., Caldow, R.W.G., Durell, S.E.A.L.V.D. and McGrorty, S. 2002. Predicting the impacts of disturbance on shorebird mortality using a behaviour-based model. Biological Conservation, 106:319–328.Google Scholar
Whitman, K., Starfield, A.M., Quadling, H.S. and Packer, C. 2004. Sustainable trophy hunting of African lions. Nature, 428:175–178.Google Scholar
Wielgus, R., Sarrazin, F., Ferriere, R. and Clobert, J. 2001. Estimating effects of adult male mortality on grizzly bear population growth and persistence using matrix models. Biological Conservation, 98:293–303.Google Scholar
Williams, B.K., Nichols, J.D. and Conroy, M.J. 2001. Analysis and Management of Animal Populations. Modeling, Estimation and Decision Making. Academic Press.
Wolf, M. and Weissing, F.J. 2012. Animal personalities: Consequences for ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 27:452–461.Google Scholar
Wright, J.P. and Jones, C.G. 2006. The concept of organisms as ecosystem engineers ten years on: progress, limitations, and challenges. Bioscience, 56:203.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×