Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T13:13:17.539Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Stakes

Conducting Relational Research with Indigenous Peoples

from Part I - Developing a Methodology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2023

Hannah Hughes
Affiliation:
Aberystwyth University
Alice B. M. Vadrot
Affiliation:
Universität Wien, Austria
Get access

Summary

In this chapter, I describe how my research with Indigenous Peoples has informed my understanding and conceptualization of what ethical research with Indigenous negotiators, representatives, and researchers at environmental negotiations based on the principle of relationality entails. Following Indigenous scholar Linda Tuhiwai Smith, I reflect on how I build relationality with Indigenous groups taking their politics at the negotiations in dialogue with their politics at the territory as part of a diplomatic effort (Indigenous diplomacies) of reciprocity between the world of global environmental negotiations, which is a world of multilateralism, and the worlds of Indigenous Peoples, which is a pluriverse of life projects. For doing this, methodologically, I look at Indigenous participation at negotiations, and in a given meeting, in conversation with how they define global environmental negotiations as both a political place and a political event that is part of a continuous political process.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Further Reading

1.de La Cadena, M. (2015) Earth-Beings: Ecologies of Practice Across Andean Worlds. Durham, NC: Morgan Lectures Series: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
In this book, Marisol de la Cadena tells us stories and strategies of Indigenous Peoples in the Andes on building relations with humans and nonhumans to achieve balance in contention to difference between many different lifeways and environments. Although it is not a book on the role of Indigenous Peoples or of a specific Indigenous group in negotiations, it addresses in a detailed and relational way how the Turpos, an extended family of Quechua people, have been building what she calls political strategies to keep their world alive in relation to the other political environments or worlds that make the Andean region. By telling this story, she also expands on her way of doing research with them and producing knowledge about politics there and elsewhere.Google Scholar
2.Brysk, A. (2000). From Tribal Village to Global Village: Indian Rights and International Relations in Latin America. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
3.Escobar, A. (2018). Designs for the Pluriverse Radical Interdependence Autonomy and the Making of Worlds. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
4.Li, T. M. (2014). Land’s End Capitalist Relations on an Indigenous Frontier. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

References

Apiah, K. A. (2006). Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a World of Strangers. London: Allen Lane Books.Google Scholar
Beier, J. M. (2005). International Relations in Uncommon Places Indigeneity, Cosmology, and the Limits of International Theory. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Benhabib, S. (2006). Another Cosmopolitanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blaser, M. (2014) Is Another Cosmopolitics Possible? Cultural Anthropology, 13(4), 545570.Google Scholar
Clifford, J. (1997). Routes: Travel and Translation in the Late Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
de la Cadena, M. (2010). Indigenous Cosmopolitics in the Andes: Conceptual Reflections beyond “Politics.Cultural Anthropology, 25(2), 334370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1360.2010.01061.x.Google Scholar
de la Cadena, M. with Blaser, M., eds. (2018). A World of Many Worlds. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Escobar, A. (2008). Territories of Difference Places, Movements, Life, Redes. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Hale, C. (2006). Activist Research v. Cultural Critique: Indigenous Land Rights and the Contradictions of Politically Engaged Anthropology. Cultural Anthropology, 21(1), 96120.Google Scholar
Holmberg, A. (2021). Working Towards Ethical Guidelines for Research Involving the Sámi. Sámiráđđi–Saami Council. Available at https://lcipp.unfccc.int/sites/default/files/2022-06/Working%20towards%20ethical%20guidelines%20for%20research%20involving%20the%20Sami_0.pdf (last accessed 11.08.2022).Google Scholar
Krenak, A. (2019). Ideias para adiar o Fim do Mundo. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, Revista ANTHROPOLÓGICAS, 31(1), 317326.Google Scholar
Marcus, G. (1995). Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-Sited Ethnography, Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95117.Google Scholar
Mato, D. (2000). Not “Studying the Subaltern,” but Studying with “Subaltern”: Social Groups, or, at Least, Studying the Hegemonic Articulations of Power. Nepantla: Views from South, 1(3).479752.Google Scholar
Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Strathern, M. (1990). The Gender of the Gift: Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia,1st ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Tsing, A. L. (2005). Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connections. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
UNFCCC (2021): LCIPP Webinar 2: What Does Ethical and Equitable Engagement of Indigenous Knowledge of Climate Change Look Like? https://lcipp.unfccc.int/calendar-events/lcipp-webinar-2-what-does-ethical-and-equitable-engagement-Indigenous-knowledge-climate-change-look (last accessed 16.08.2022).Google Scholar
Vecchione-Gonçalves, M. (2009). Between the Leader of Virtù and the Good Savage Indigenous Struggles and Life Projects in the Amazon Basin. In Beier, J. M., ed., Indigenous Diplomacies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 133154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vecchione-Gonaçalves, M. (2014). Managing Borders, Nurturing Life: Existences, Resistances and Political Becoming in the Amazon Forest. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Hamilton: McMaster University. Available at https://macsphere.mcmaster.ca/handle/11375/1609.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×